1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) base stations, and in particular to calibrating a network of portable, secondary base or reference stations in relation to a master base station for differential GNSS correction over a coverage region comprising multiple overlapping coverage polygons.
2. Description of the Related Art
Differential GNSS techniques have been successfully applied for a number of years. These techniques, for example, enable accurate real-time positioning of a rover receiver relative to a base receiver. This positioning includes code-only or carrier-smoothed-code differential techniques that result in sub-meter accuracy, such as those employed while operating with older RTCM 104 messages. They include carrier phase based techniques that facilitate centimeter-level real-time kinematic (RTK) positioning.
Differential GNSS (DGNSS), as its name implies, requires that data be differenced. One of the most useful differences in DGNSS, and therefore a widely used difference, is that of differencing two similar observations of satellite ranging signals where one observation is made at a base or reference GNSS receiver and another is made at a rover GNSS receiver. This type of difference, commonly referred to as the single-difference, removes common-mode errors (i.e. errors seen by both base and rover receivers) such as satellite orbit errors, satellite clock errors, and atmospheric errors that arise as the signal passes through the ionosphere and the troposphere. The remaining sources of error that result when employing single-difference techniques are those that are unique to the receiver, such as receiver noise and multipath. These remaining errors are often small in comparison to the common-mode errors, especially when carrier-phase observations are employed. Left unchecked, these errors can, over time, result in relatively large inaccuracies in the differential signals provided by base stations. In DGPS/DGNSS systems, a stationary base receiver uses its known location as a reference for computing differential corrections that correct errors in its own phase observations, and these corrections are then supplied over a communication link to a rover to correct similar errors seen at the rover. Alternatively, the base station supplies its reference location and phase observations over the communication link to the rover for computing the differential corrections itself, or takes a mathematically equivalent approach of forming single-differences between base and rover observations.
It is common practice to obtain differential position information using base stations to provide the additional signals to GNSS satellite positional signals. These base stations typically use either known GNSS position coordinates selected from a list of previously used coordinates or automatically-generated coordinates calculated by averaging GNSS-based position data. However, when a master and multiple secondary base stations are used for covering a large region, one base station's coordinate system may not line up with another base station's system. Thus, when a working vehicle travels from one base station signal coverage area to another, the positions computed by a guidance CPU within the working vehicle may suddenly “jump” when transitioning to the coverage area of the new GNSS base station. The vehicle (e.g., tractor/implement) may be guided along a guide path based on the new base station differential positioning data which does not line up with the previous path, resulting in uneven rows within a field.
To address this problem, Whitehead and McClure U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,294, which is assigned to a common assignee and is incorporated herein by reference, discloses portable reference stations for local differential GPS corrections. A base or reference station location(s) is determined and stored. Either differential correction terms or raw satellite ranges are transmitted to GNSS-equipped remote or rover vehicles for use in differential GNSS (DGNSS) positioning and guidance operations. The base or reference station can be removed and later returned to the general area of its previous location, for which the GNSS position coordinates have been saved. If placed within a predetermined threshold distance of a previously-saved location, the base or reference station will “snap” to the saved reference location and compute GNSS corrector terms using the saved reference location data. Otherwise a new GNSS-based reference position will be computed for immediate use and added to the list of stored reference locations for future use.
What is needed then is a system and method designed to coordinate several base stations together to form one large region of differential guidance based off of a single “known” coordinate for a master base station. Doing this would ensure that when the working vehicle leaves the signal area of one base station and enters into another, the current path that the vehicle is traveling will not deviate or “jump” because of a difference in the “known” coordinates that the base station is basing its differential positional information upon.
DGNSS requires rover and base GNSS receivers. The base is typically stationary at a known location and sends to a rover GNSS receiver phase (or pseudo-range) observations plus its known location, or in lieu of this, differential correctors or other differential enabling data via radios or cell phones. The rover receives the correctors from the base(s) and uses them to correct its own satellite ranging signal observations to increase their accuracy. The result is that the rover can provide a more accurate location using corrected observations, even to the centimeter level or less when carrier phase is used in an RTK solution. The range of a base signal is, however, limited. For large fields or tracts of land, a master and multiple secondary base receivers may be needed to provide differential positioning data to the rovers to cover the entire region.
DGNSS base stations are used to generate and transmit GNSS corrections from base reference positions to rover DGNSS receivers, typically by radio or cellular telecommunication, to improve accuracy to RTK or near RTK (e.g., sub-centimeter) levels. Corrections are sent out from a base system, referenced to the coordinates set for the base, and either manually entered, automatically selected from a list of previously saved points, or automatically selected after a period of data averaging.
Most applications do not need absolute accuracy, but do require high relative accuracy during field operations, both within the same week and for subsequent field operations months or even years later. In agriculture, this allows for planting, cultivating, and harvesting with minimal field disturbance for water and soil conservation, including the ability to drive without damage to sub-surface drip tape used for high efficiency watering.
This invention allows a vehicle to base its entire preplanned path upon the known coordinates of a single master base station, and then transfer those coordinates to calibrate other base stations as it enters the signal area of these secondary base stations, thus expanding the secondary base station network. Essentially, this invention will calibrate secondary base stations to the coordinate information of a single, master base station using a mobile transceiver device within a working vehicle.
In the practice of an aspect of the present invention, a master base station receiver can be either arbitrarily placed for relative positioning or surveyed-in for absolute positioning. The master base station references a master set of coordinates (XYZ), which can be manually entered, automatically selected from a list of previously saved coordinates or automatically selected after a period of data averaging.
A rover receives differential correction signals (DGNSS) from the master base station over a radio link for relatively precise guidance, for example centimeter-level using real-time kinematic (RTK) techniques. As the rover enters the coverage area of a secondary base station, new correction signals are received from the secondary base station, which can differ substantially (e.g., 1 m or more) from the master base station correction signals. Such offsets are typical with base stations receiving correction signals from the Wide Area Augmentation System (WARS) and other satellite-based augmentation systems (SBAS). These offsets cause an apparent GNSS-based position jump when the rover switches to the frequency of the secondary base station upon entering its coverage area. Merely averaging the inconsistent position correctors from the master and second base stations can still result in discrepancies of half a meter or more.
With the present invention the rover transmits these offsets over its radio link to the secondary base station for application to its correction data, which will then be conformed to align with the master base station correction data, thus eliminating the base-station-transition correction data jump. Correction data from the master and the secondary base stations thus align relatively precisely, thereby enabling seamless centimeter-level guidance as the rover travels from the master to the secondary base station coverage area.
A differentially-corrected-position network of base stations with overlapping coverage polygons can thus be expanded from the original master base station by computing the ΔX (latitude in degrees or meters), ΔY (longitude in degrees or meters) and ΔZ (height in meters) offsets from the master coordinates for each secondary base station and applying these shifts at each secondary base station whereby the GNSS-based position discrepancies or “jumps” encountered while transitioning between base stations are minimized. The master-to-secondary positioning information shifts can either be manually entered at each secondary base station or automatically uploaded from the rover system, e.g. as the rover transitions between coverage areas around respective base stations. The rover thus functions to expand the network of overlapping, secondary base station coverage polygons as it traverses a working area and transmits shift-based data for conforming the correctors emanating from the secondary base stations.
The rover positioning system processor can define a list of base stations and their respective coverage area polygons for automatically switching the rover receiver frequencies to receive the correction signals from the base station(s) within range. The hysteresis effect maintains the rover receiver in contact with a current base station until the rover exits its coverage area polygon, whereupon correction data is received from another base station, to which the rover has transmitted the applicable master-to-secondary location coordinate offsets over the radio link. Likewise, the hysteresis effect will maintain the radio contact with the secondary base station until the rover leaves its coverage area, whereupon coverage from the master (or another secondary) base station seamlessly resumes.
The system can also save previously-generated secondary base location corrections for use in future operations, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,294, which is incorporated herein by reference. For example, if a secondary base receiver antenna is returned to within a defined distance (e.g., 5 m) from a previously-generated, saved secondary base station location, the secondary base location will be generated by averaging GNSS locations at that point, and corrections will be generated from rover-transmitted master base station correction data, as described above. An extra message will be transmitted from the secondary base station to the rover with the saved, previously-generated, secondary base location corrections. Saved base station locations can thus be reused for improving rover location repeatability for accurate relative positioning from previous DGNSS-guided operations within the coverage area.
I. Introduction and Environment
As required, detailed aspects of the disclosed subject matter are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed aspects are merely exemplary of the invention, which may be embodied in various forms, Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art how to variously employ the present invention in virtually any appropriately detailed structure.
Certain terminology will be used in the following description for convenience in reference only and will not be limiting. For example, up, down, front, hack, right and left refer to the invention as orientated in the view being referred to. Said terminology will include the words specifically mentioned, derivatives thereof and words of similar meaning.
Generally, a preferred embodiment of the present invention consists of equipping a vehicle with a rover guidance unit and situating a number of base station transceiver units over an area to be traversed. One base station will be identified as a “master” base station and should be positioned relatively near the vehicle starting position. The base stations and rover receiver should be programmed to track the same GNSS constellation(s), such as the global positioning system (GPS), Galileo, GLONASS, etc.
II. Portable Reference Station System 2
Referring to the drawings more detail, the reference numeral 10 generally designates a portable reference station system embodying the present invention and generally including a master base or reference station (base 1), multiple secondary base stations (bases 2-5) located in relation to the master base station 1, and a rover 11.
As shown in
The base station 1 is preferably installed at a predetermined location designated P.1, which can comprise a benchmark or monument for absolute positioning and can be located (i.e. “surveyed in”) by conventional surveying techniques. For relative positioning, the location of P.1 can vary whereby the locations of the secondary base stations 2-5 are established relative to the location of base 1 at P.1. Additional GNSS-defined locations (e.g., P.2-P.4) can be established and recorded throughout the coverage area 14.1.
The rover 11 is positioned over P.4, which can comprise a “point-of-interest” on the ground, and is located by 2D, planar orthogonal coordinates X.1, Y.1 relative to the base station 1. The vertical axis Z coordinate at P.4 can be computed from Z.B.1 (at base station 1) and Z.R (at rover 11), and would be relatively constant on flat ground whereas the XY coordinates would be variable with the moving rover 11. Various GNSS-based positioning and guidance techniques can be utilized in connection with operating the rover 11, such as tilt compensation and articulated implement guidance and control. Moreover, the system 10 enables computing the locations of the smart antenna units 22, 26 as the points-of-interest, as well as ground locations forming guide paths and the locations of other objects, such as towed implements, in fixed and variable relations to the smart antenna units 22, 26.
If no base station signal is picked up by the rover smart antenna unit 26, GNSS guidance can continue with satellite ranging signals received directly, but accuracy will be reduced due to the lack of the differential positioning component. However, the system 10 will continue checking for base station correction signals. Once a base station signal is picked up, the rover smart antenna unit 26 will guide the rover 11 along the preplanned path based on the base station signal that it picks up. To reduce this drop in signal and increase the ability to synchronize all base stations to the master base station, additional secondary base stations can be added throughout the field or the region where vehicle guidance is occurring. This allows for a network of base stations to be easily setup using automatic averaging and networked together by the application of a series of X, Y, and Z shifts.
Changing between the use of differential corrections from each base station in view will allow the calculation of a required X, Y, and/or Z shift from the master base station 1. These shifts will be applied to the secondary base station(s) 2-5 to make the position transitions from using base corrections from the master and secondary base stations minimized. This shift can either be entered manually at each secondary base station, or, in the preferred embodiment, automatically uploaded from the rover smart antenna unit 26. Using this method, additional base stations can be included within the network to create more overlapping Space; and thus reduce transitional error. Essentially, the rover 11 is acting to synchronize the secondary base station(s) 2-5 with the master base station 1.
The multi-base, position-averaging calibration method described, above is particularly useful in operations, such as agriculture, requiring precision and covering regions too large for a single base station. Moreover, agricultural and other repetitive operations can benefit from the repeatability of the system 10 whereby the same vehicle guide paths can be reconstructed and followed season-after-season. For example, even if the secondary base stations were removed during off seasons, they can be approximately relocated and the system 10 will reconfigure itself based on their new positions.
This method of an X, Y, Z offset can be made automatic by a DGNSS base station. At each reference point occupied when base corrections are generated, the base location used can be saved into the CPU memory of the rover 11, as well as the base station's internal memory. If the base station is returned to within a defined distance from those series of saved locations, such as within five meters, the base location will be generated from averaging DGNSS locations at that point and corrections generated previously. In addition, an extra message will be transmitted occasionally that includes the X, Y, Z error from that close, previously occupied base location. This shift will be applied by the rover 11 to shift the used position to utilize the reference position of the previously occupied base location. This allows easy reuse of base locations and improved repeatability of vehicle travel locations giving accurate relative positioning from previous work carried out in the area. This is particularly useful for farm operations where repeating paths benefits in lower crop damage and soil erosion.
It is to be understood that while certain aspects of the disclosed subject matter have been shown and described, the disclosed subject matter is not limited thereto and encompasses various other embodiments and aspects. The above-mentioned steps and components are not meant to limit the use or organization of the present invention. The steps for performing the method may be performed in any logical method and the process can be used for other types of processes when viable.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/017,445; filed Feb. 5, 2016 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/457,987 filed Aug. 12, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,255,992; issued Feb. 9, 2016, which is a continuation of and claims priority in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/300,609, filed Nov. 20, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,803,735, issued Aug. 12, 2014, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/415,693, filed Nov. 19, 2010, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4963889 | Hatch | Oct 1990 | A |
5021792 | Hwang | Jun 1991 | A |
5194851 | Kraning et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5390125 | Sennott et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5404661 | Sahm | Apr 1995 | A |
5430654 | Kyrtsos | Jul 1995 | A |
5612864 | Henderson | Mar 1997 | A |
5619211 | Horkin | Apr 1997 | A |
5646844 | Gudat | Jul 1997 | A |
5663879 | Trovato et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5828336 | Yunck | Oct 1998 | A |
5854987 | Sekine | Dec 1998 | A |
5875408 | Bendett | Feb 1999 | A |
5923270 | Sampo et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5955973 | Anderson | Sep 1999 | A |
6052647 | Parkinson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6070673 | Wendte | Jun 2000 | A |
6073070 | Diekhans | Jun 2000 | A |
6095439 | Segal | Aug 2000 | A |
6100842 | Dreier | Aug 2000 | A |
6198430 | Hwang | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212453 | Kawagoe et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6266595 | Greatline | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6313788 | Wilson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6373432 | Rabinowitz et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377889 | Soest | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6421003 | Riley | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6445983 | Dickson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6445990 | Manring | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463374 | Keller | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466162 | Boman | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6515619 | McKay, Jr. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6539303 | McClure et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6542077 | Joao | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6553299 | Keller | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6711501 | McClure et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6789014 | Rekow et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6804587 | O Connor | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6819780 | Benson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6865465 | McClure | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6876920 | Mailer | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7110762 | Cameron | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7142956 | Heiniger et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7162348 | McClure et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7277792 | Overschie | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298325 | Krikorian | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7373231 | McClure et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7400956 | Feller et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7437230 | McClure | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7460942 | Mailer | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7511667 | Matsuoka | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7689354 | Heiniger et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
RE41358 | Heiniger et al. | May 2010 | E |
7835832 | Macdonald et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7852267 | Duffett-Smith | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7860628 | Lange | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7885745 | McClure et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8018376 | McClure et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8140223 | Whitehead | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8190337 | McClure | May 2012 | B2 |
8214111 | Heiniger et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8265826 | Feller | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8311696 | Reeve | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8386129 | Collins et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8401704 | Pollock et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8437901 | Anderson | May 2013 | B2 |
8489291 | Dearborn et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8521372 | Hunt et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8548649 | Guyette et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8583315 | Whitehead et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8583326 | Collins et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8589013 | Pieper et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8594879 | Roberge et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8634993 | McClure et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8639416 | Jones et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8649930 | Reeve et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8676620 | Hunt et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8718874 | McClure et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8768558 | Reeve et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781685 | McClure | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8803735 | McClure | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8897973 | Hunt et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8924152 | Hunt et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9002565 | Jones et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9002566 | McClure et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9141111 | Webber et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9162703 | Miller et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9173337 | Guyette et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9223314 | McClure et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9255992 | McClure | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9389615 | Webber et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20020072850 | McClure et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020107609 | Benneweis | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030187560 | Keller | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040186644 | McClure et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050037775 | Moeglein | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060167600 | Nelson, Jr. et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070267524 | Mack | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080195268 | Sapilewski | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090102708 | Dai | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090121932 | Whitehead | May 2009 | A1 |
20090322600 | Whitehead | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100185366 | Heiniger | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100190509 | Davis | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100274452 | Ringwald et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100323723 | Gerstenberger | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015817 | Reeve | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018765 | Whitehead | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120086598 | Aghili | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120093143 | Sun | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120127032 | McClure | May 2012 | A1 |
20120139784 | Ashjaee | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154214 | Leandro | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154215 | Vollath | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130027245 | Lennen | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130069822 | Wu | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130106657 | Perthold | May 2013 | A1 |
20140214275 | Miller | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140266877 | McClure | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277676 | Gattis | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140292569 | Wallace | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140292570 | Wallace | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140347217 | McClure | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150175194 | Gattis | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160039454 | Mortimer | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160154108 | McClure et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160205864 | Gattis et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160214643 | Joughin et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160252909 | Webber et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160334804 | Webber et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002244539 | Oct 2002 | AU |
1998036288 | Aug 1998 | WO |
2000024239 | May 2000 | WO |
2003019430 | Mar 2003 | WO |
2010005945 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2011014431 | Feb 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 10751234.5; dated Jul. 19, 2012; 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/AU2008/000002, dated Mar. 5, 2008; 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/021334 dated Mar. 12, 2010; 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/043094 dated Sep. 17, 2010; 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/058659 dated Mar. 3, 2015; 10 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2009/033693 dated Apr. 4, 2009, 3 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2009/039686 dated May 26, 2009; 3 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2009/049776. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2009/060668 dated Dec. 9, 2009; 7 pages. |
Van Zuydam,. R.P., Centimeter-Precision Guidante of Agricultural Impleet ns in the Open Field by Means of Real Tim Kinematic DGPS, ASA-CSSA-SSSA, pp. 1023-1034 (1999). |
Noh, Kwang-Mo, Self-tuning controller for farm tractor guidance, Iowa State University Retrospective Theses and Dissertations, Paper 9874, (1990). |
Van Zuydam,. R.P., Centimeter-Precision Guidance of Agricultural Implements in the Open Field by Means of Real Tim Kinematic DGPS, ASA-CSSA-SSSA, pp. 1023-1034 (1999). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180156918 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61415693 | Nov 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15017445 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 15866317 | US | |
Parent | 14457987 | Aug 2014 | US |
Child | 15017445 | US | |
Parent | 15866317 | US | |
Child | 15017445 | US | |
Parent | 14457987 | Aug 2014 | US |
Child | 15866317 | US | |
Parent | 13300609 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 14457987 | US |