This invention relates generally to a portable X-ray detector plate with shock absorption means for at least minimising the damaging effect of an impact to the detector plate caused, for example, by a fall or knock.
It is widely known, in the field of non-invasive medical diagnosis, to obtain a radiation image of a subject to be imaged with radiation and detecting the intensity distribution of the radiation that has been transmitted through the subject to be imaged. In the following, X-ray systems in particular are referred to. However, it will be appreciated that the present invention can be applied in respect of other types of radiation imaging systems, and the present invention is not necessarily intended to be limited in this regard.
Referring to
Portable X-ray systems are known which generally comprise a portable X-ray generating unit and a portable X-ray image detecting sensor unit for use in the case, for example, where a patient (typically in intensive care) is not well enough to be moved to the main X-ray station. However, portable X-ray systems are becoming increasingly more commonly used anyway, because they are relatively very convenient in that the sensor unit can be positioned in any desired orientation relative to the patient to be imaged.
A conventional X-ray image detecting sensor unit, or cassette, comprises an X-ray image detection panel within a substantially rectangular casing. Thus, the sensor unit has an active area that is defined by the size of the detection panel. On the one hand, it is desirable for the edge of the detection panel to be as close as possible to the edge of the casing, so as to maximise the active area, and enable even the harder-to-reach areas of a subject (e.g. under the arm) to be effectively imaged. However, on the other hand, in order to protect the detection panel (and associated electronics) against damage caused by impact to the cassette, it is desirable to have an adequate margin between the detection panel and the inner walls of the cassette so as to enable the provision of adequate shock absorbing means.
Consider, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,700,126, which describes a digital X-ray sensor unit in the form of a cassette, wherein shock absorbers made of substantially L-shaped plastic or rubber are disposed at the inner sides of four corners of the casing, between the inner walls of the casing and a support carrying the detection panel, and a margin is provided all the way round the casing between the inner walls thereof and the support periphery to accommodate the shock absorbers. However, because of the margin or gap between the active area and the edge of the cassette, it is difficult to effectively image some areas of a subject, such as under the arm. Referring to
Referring to
However, referring additionally back to
Thus, it is an object of the present invention to provide a portable X-ray detector unit in which the active area of the detection panel is maximised whilst enabling the provision of adequate shock absorbing capability.
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a portable radiation detector unit, comprising a detection panel housed within a cassette, said detection panel being arranged and configured to receive radiation transmitted through a subject to be imaged and generate an image signal representative of the intensity distribution of said received radiation, wherein a margin for providing shock absorption is provided between the inner wall of said cassette and the peripheral edge of said detection panel at least one corner thereof, with little or no margin being provided along at least a portion of one side thereof.
In a first embodiment, the margin for providing shock absorption is provided between the inner wall of said cassette and the peripheral edge of said detection panel at least one corner thereof and substantially no margin is provided along at least a portion of one side thereof. This may be achieved wherein the shape and configuration of the cassette is such that the edge of the detection panel along said at least one side thereof is substantially immediately adjacent the inner wall of the cassette. Alternatively, the side wall of the cassette may be interrupted along said at least one side of the detection panel, such that at least a portion of said at least one side thereof is exposed.
In another embodiment, a margin may be provided all around the detection panel, between a peripheral edge thereof and the inner wall of the cassette, wherein the width of the margin along at least a portion of one side of the detection panel is less than that at least one corner thereof.
One or more shock absorbing elements may be provided within said margin at at least one corner of said detection panel.
Thus, shock absorption functionality can be selectively provided at one or more of the corners of the detection panel (bearing in mind that, if the unit is dropped, it will generally land on one of its corners), whilst along at least part of one edge, the detection panel (and corresponding active area) is substantially adjacent the inner wall of the cassette, so as to maximise the active area at that part of the unit and enable harder-to-reach parts of the subject (e.g. under the arm) to be effectively imaged.
These and other aspects of the present invention will be apparent from, and elucidated with reference to, the embodiment described herein.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of examples only and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
In known X-ray detector units, shock absorption means or “buffers” can be provided internally and/or externally of the unit. Thus, if the shock absorption means is provided internally, springs or rubber buffers for example are provided within the margin provided between the detector panel and the inner wall of the cassette or casing surrounding it. If such means are provided externally, it means that the shock absorption means are provided on the outer wall of the cassette or casing. Either or both types of buffering may be provided in a single unit. Equally, either or both types of buffering may be used in the detector unit of the present invention, and the present invention is not necessarily intended to be limited in this regard.
Thus, referring to
Referring to
Referring to
It will be appreciated that the at least one minimal margin can be provided at one or more of the edges of the detector unit, and the or each minimal margin may be protected by, for example, movable, removable and/or flexible (whether movable, removable or otherwise) protective strips of material 24.
It should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate rather than limit the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be capable of designing many alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. In the claims, any reference signs placed in parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claims. The word “comprising” and “comprises”, and the like, does not exclude the presence of elements or steps other than those listed in any claim or the specification as a whole. The singular reference of an element does not exclude the plural reference of such elements and vice-versa. The invention may be implemented by means of hardware comprising several distinct elements, and by means of a suitably programmed computer. In a device claim enumerating several means, several of these means may be embodied by one and the same item of hardware. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
05100970 | Feb 2005 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2006/050306 | 1/27/2006 | WO | 00 | 8/7/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/085232 | 8/17/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4455671 | Farrar | Jun 1984 | A |
4943991 | Mosby | Jul 1990 | A |
5370229 | Kroeckel et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
6533453 | Heidsieck et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6592257 | Heidsieck et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6700126 | Watanabe | Mar 2004 | B2 |
20020005490 | Watanabe | Jan 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3315609 | Oct 1984 | DE |
933650 | Aug 1999 | EP |
2002143138 | May 2002 | JP |
2004184679 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004219705 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004084730 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080292059 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |