Power array with staggered arrangement for improving on-resistance and safe operating area

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8941175
  • Patent Number
    8,941,175
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 17, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 27, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A power array with a staggered arrangement for improving on-resistance and safe operating area of a device is provided. Each power array includes two or more rows with a plurality of parallel device units arranged along the row. Each device unit includes a source region, a drain region, and a gate disposed between the source region and the drain region, wherein each drain region is offset from the adjacent drain region of adjacent rows in a row direction.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates generally to a power array, and more particularly, to a power array with a staggered arrangement for improving on-resistance (RDSon) and safe operating area (SOA).


2. Description of the Prior Art


Following the semiconductor industry development with time, high voltage devices have been widely applied in many electronic systems. These high voltage devices with various voltage levels are implemented as LDMOS, CMOS or DEMOS devices included in integrated circuits (IC). For example, low, intermediate and high power devices may be provided in ICs. Low power devices may be used in complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) for logic circuitry, intermediate voltage devices for analog circuitry and high power devices for high voltage output interfaces. It is desirable for high voltage devices to have a fast switching speed. The performances of such devices depend on, for example, the on resistance (RDSon) and the drain to source breakdown voltage.


For a good voltage array device, it is appreciated that the device shows good switching characteristics (ex. Low RDSon) and a widened safe operating area (SOA). Especially in the case of bigger array devices, thermal problem always impact the reliability of the device, so a widen SOA may ensure that no burn-out issue occur in the active area.


Moreover, the breakdown voltage and the on-resistance of the high voltage device are generally inversely related. There is a tradeoff between the breakdown voltage and the on-resistance. How to improve the breakdown voltage while maintaining a low on-resistance becomes a challenge.


Accordingly, a primary goal of the voltage device design is to minimize the RDSon while maintaining a high breakdown voltage and a robust SOA over the current and voltage operating area.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

To obtain low on-resistance (RDSon) and a widen safe operating area (SOA), a power array with a novel and staggered arrangement is provided in the present invention. The staggered arrangement of device units in the present invention may gain a larger distance between adjacent drain regions, thereby suppressing the heat accumulation in the device, especially in the drain region. The burn-out voltage and the safe operating area are accordingly increased.


The object of the present invention is to provide a power array with a staggered arrangement for the improving on-resistance and safe operating area. The power array includes two or more rows. Each row includes a plurality of parallel device units arranged along the row. Each device unit includes a source region, a drain region, and a gate disposed between the source region and the drain region, wherein each drain region is offset in a row direction from the adjacent drain region of the adjacent row.


These and other objectives of the present invention will no doubt become obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment that is illustrated in the various figures and drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the embodiments, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate some of the embodiments and, together with the description, serve to explain their principles. In the drawings:



FIG. 1 is a top view schematically illustrating a power array with two rows, wherein each row has a plurality of parallel device units in a staggered arrangement in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is an enlarged top view of FIG. 1 schematically illustrating the components of each device unit in the device row and the aspect of the staggered arrangement between two device rows; and



FIG. 3 is an enlarged top view of FIG. 1 schematically illustrating the components of each device unit in the device row and another aspect of the staggered arrangement between two device rows.





It should be noted that all the figures are diagrammatic. Relative dimensions and proportions of parts of the drawings have been shown exaggerated or reduced in size, for the sake of clarity and convenience in the drawings. The same reference numerals are generally used to refer to corresponding or similar features in modified and different embodiments.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following detailed description of the invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. Other embodiments may be utilized and structural, logical, and electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.


The embodiments will now be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings to provide a better understanding to the structure of the present invention. First, as shown in FIG. 1, a power array 100 is provided with at least two device rows in a staggered arrangement (in this embodiment, three device rows 101/102/103 are shown in FIG. 1). Each device row further includes a plurality of parallel device units 105, such as LDMOS, FDMOS, CMOS or DEMOS, arranged along the device row.


Please refer now to FIG. 2. FIG. 2 is an enlarged top view of FIG. 1 schematically and clearly illustrating the components of each device unit 105 in adjacent device rows 101 and 102 and the aspect of the staggered arrangement between these two device rows. As shown in FIG. 2, both device rows 101 and 102 include a plurality of parallel device units 105 (shown in the dashed block) arranged along the device row, and each device unit extends in a direction perpendicular to the row direction R. In the preferred embodiment, each device unit 105 is composed of a central drain region (D), two gate regions (G, one may be referred as a 2nd gate region) at both sides of the drain region (D), and two source regions (S, one may be referred as a 2nd source region) at two edges of the device units 105, such as parallel, finger-type gates, sources or drains. The gate region (G) is intervening between the drain region (D) and the source regions (S). For the simplicity of the drawing, only the components of source, drain and gate are shown in FIG. 2. The device unit 105 may includes other components, such as interconnections, contacts, n+ or n-drift regions, STIs, epitaxy layers, dielectric layers or other diffusion or doped regions (not shown).


In a conventional power array arrangement, each device row is aligned exactly with the other. That is, the gate region, source region, and drain region of one device row are aligned respectively with the corresponding gate region, source region, and drain region of other device rows in the power array. In comparison thereto, the most significant technical feature of present invention is that the drain region in one device row is offset in a row direction R from adjacent drain region of adjacent device rows. For example, as shown in FIG. 2 the drain region (D) of the device row 101 is offset from the drain region (D) of the device row 102 by a distance D1 in the row direction R. The offset of the distance D1 will increase the actual distance between the drain region (D) of the device row 101 and the drain region (D) of the device row 102 (measured from the center of drain regions) from D2 to D3. Preferably, in the present invention, the drain region (D) of device row 101 with such offset arrangement of power array 100 will be aligned with the border between two adjacent device units 105 of the device row 102. In such a staggered arrangement, the actual distance D3 between two adjacent drain regions (D) is maximized.


Alternative, the device unit 105 may have different composition in other embodiment, not limited to the arrangement shown in FIG. 2. Please refer to FIG. 3, which is an enlarged top view of FIG. 1 schematically and clearly illustrating another aspect of the staggered arrangement between these two device rows. As shown in FIG. 3, the device unit 105 in this embodiment is composed only of a source region (S), a drain region (D), and a gate region (G) disposed between the source region (S) and the drain region (D). Preferably, in this embodiment, the drain region (D) of device row 101 with such offset arrangement will be aligned with the midpoint (M) between adjacent source region (S) and gate region (G) of adjacent device row 102. In such a staggered arrangement, the actual distance D3 between two adjacent drain regions (D) is maximized.


The drain region (D) is the most vulnerable area in a MOS device which is subject to burn-out issues under high voltage or current operation. By offsetting the drain regions in the power array, the actual distance between adjacent drain regions may be increased, thereby effectively suppressing the heat accumulation. The burn-out voltage and the safe operating area (SOA) are accordingly increased. The on-resistance (RDSon) may also be improved.


Those skilled in the art will readily observe that numerous modifications and alterations of the device and method may be made while retaining the teachings of the invention. Accordingly, the above disclosure should be construed as limited only by the metes and bounds of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A power array with a staggered arrangement for improving on-resistance and safe operating area, comprising: two or more rows, wherein each said row comprises a plurality of parallel device units arranged along said row, each said device unit comprises a source region, a drain region, and a gate disposed between said source region and said drain region, wherein each said drain region is offset in a row direction from adjacent said drain region of adjacent said row, and each said gate is offset in said row direction from adjacent said gate of adjacent said row.
  • 2. A power array with staggered arrangement for improving on-resistance and safe operating area according to claim 1, each said device unit further comprises a 2nd source region and a 2nd gate region, wherein said drain region is disposed at the center of said device unit, said gate region and said 2nd gate region are disposed respectively at both sides of said drain region, and said source region and said 2nd source region are disposed respectively at the edges of said device unit.
  • 3. A power array with staggered arrangement for improving on-resistance and safe operating area according to claim 2, wherein each said drain region is aligned with the border between two adjacent said device units of adjacent said TOW.
  • 4. A power array with staggered arrangement for improving on-resistance and safe operating area according to claim 1, wherein each said drain region is aligned with the midpoint between adjacent said source region and said gate region of adjacent said row.
  • 5. A power array with staggered arrangement for improving on-resistance and safe operating area according to claim 1, wherein said device unit extends in a direction perpendicular to said row direction.
  • 6. A power array with staggered arrangement for improving on-resistance and safe operating area according to claim 1, wherein said device unit comprises LDMOS, CMOS or DEMOS.
US Referenced Citations (88)
Number Name Date Kind
4344081 Pao Aug 1982 A
4396999 Malaviya Aug 1983 A
4893160 Blanchard Jan 1990 A
4918333 Anderson Apr 1990 A
4958089 Fitzpatrick Sep 1990 A
5040045 McArthur Aug 1991 A
5268589 Dathe Dec 1993 A
5296393 Smayling Mar 1994 A
5326711 Malhi Jul 1994 A
5346835 Malhi Sep 1994 A
5430316 Contiero Jul 1995 A
5436486 Fujishima Jul 1995 A
5534721 Shibib Jul 1996 A
5811850 Smayling Sep 1998 A
5950090 Chen Sep 1999 A
5998301 Pham Dec 1999 A
6066884 Krutsick May 2000 A
6144538 Chao Nov 2000 A
6165846 Carns Dec 2000 A
6245689 Hao Jun 2001 B1
6277675 Tung Aug 2001 B1
6277757 Lin Aug 2001 B1
6297108 Chu Oct 2001 B1
6306700 Yang Oct 2001 B1
6326283 Liang Dec 2001 B1
6353247 Pan Mar 2002 B1
6388292 Lin May 2002 B1
6400003 Huang Jun 2002 B1
6424005 Tsai Jul 2002 B1
6514830 Fang Feb 2003 B1
6521538 Soga Feb 2003 B2
6614089 Nakamura Sep 2003 B2
6713794 Suzuki Mar 2004 B2
6762098 Hshieh Jul 2004 B2
6764890 Xu Jul 2004 B1
6784060 Ryoo Aug 2004 B2
6784490 Inoue Aug 2004 B1
6819184 Pengelly Nov 2004 B2
6822296 Wang Nov 2004 B2
6825531 Mallikarjunaswamy Nov 2004 B1
6846729 Andoh Jan 2005 B2
6855581 Roh Feb 2005 B2
6869848 Kwak Mar 2005 B2
6894349 Beasom May 2005 B2
6958515 Hower Oct 2005 B2
7015116 Lo Mar 2006 B1
7023050 Salama Apr 2006 B2
7037788 Ito May 2006 B2
7075575 Hynecek Jul 2006 B2
7091079 Chen Aug 2006 B2
7095080 Johansson Aug 2006 B2
7148540 Shibib Dec 2006 B2
7214591 Hsu May 2007 B2
7309636 Chen Dec 2007 B2
7323740 Park Jan 2008 B2
7358567 Hsu Apr 2008 B2
7427552 Jin Sep 2008 B2
8278710 Khemka et al. Oct 2012 B2
20030022460 Park Jan 2003 A1
20030209759 Blanchard Nov 2003 A1
20040018698 Schmidt Jan 2004 A1
20040070050 Chi Apr 2004 A1
20050227448 Chen Oct 2005 A1
20050258496 Tsuchiko Nov 2005 A1
20060035437 Mitsuhira Feb 2006 A1
20060261407 Blanchard Nov 2006 A1
20060270134 Lee Nov 2006 A1
20060270171 Chen Nov 2006 A1
20070041227 Hall Feb 2007 A1
20070082440 Shiratake Apr 2007 A1
20070132033 Wu Jun 2007 A1
20070273001 Chen Nov 2007 A1
20080160697 Kao Jul 2008 A1
20080160706 Jung Jul 2008 A1
20080185629 Nakano Aug 2008 A1
20080296655 Lin Dec 2008 A1
20090108348 Yang Apr 2009 A1
20090111252 Huang Apr 2009 A1
20090159966 Huang Jun 2009 A1
20090278208 Chang Nov 2009 A1
20090294865 Tang Dec 2009 A1
20100006937 Lee Jan 2010 A1
20100032758 Wang Feb 2010 A1
20100096702 Chen Apr 2010 A1
20100148250 Lin Jun 2010 A1
20100213517 Sonsky Aug 2010 A1
20110057263 Tang Mar 2011 A1
20110115029 Van Den Boom May 2011 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Definition of align downloaded from URL< http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/align> on Jun. 11, 2014.
Wen-Yi Chen, Ming-Dou Ker, “New Layout Arrangement to Improve ESD BRobustness of Large-Array High-Voltage nLDMOS”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 159-160, Feb. 2010.
Brisbin, D., Strachan, A., Chaparala, P., “1-D and 2-D Hot Carrier Layout Optimization of n-LDMOS Transistor Arrays”, IEEE IRW Final Report, pp. 120-124, (2002).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140367789 A1 Dec 2014 US