The present invention relates generally to power-up circuits, and particularly to power-up circuits used to turn on BGREF (bandgap voltage reference) circuits, and BGREF level comparators.
In many types of non-volatile memory (NVM) cells, such as flash memory or electrically erasable, programmable read only memory (EEPROM), an example of which is a nitride, read only memory (NROM), reading data stored in the memory cell should be performed at a known minimum VDD voltage. For example, but not necessarily, the read voltage should be not less than 2.4V. Below this voltage, charge pump circuits, sense amplifiers, regulator circuits, and the NROM cell itself may not function properly, resulting in incorrect data and margin loss. Thus, it is desirable that the circuitry (chip) should have internal circuit to detect that VDD has reached the required minimum value.
Reference is now made to
In the current mirror (active load), the gates of PMOS transistors M4 and M5 are connected to each other, and the drain of PMOS transistor M5 is connected to its gate. The sources of PMOS transistors M4 and M5 may be connected to a reference voltage, such as VDD.
The gate of NMOS transistor M2 is connected to BGREF, whereas the gate of NMOS transistor M1 is connected to node n1. The sources of NMOS transistors M1 and M2 are connected to current source I1. The drain of NMOS transistor M2 is connected to the drain of PMOS transistor M4 via a node n2 and the drain of NMOS transistor M1 is connected to the drain of PMOS transistor M5 via a node n3.
Two inverters 6 and 7 buffer the comparator output OPC (from node n2) to the general output OP. Inverter 6 is connected to the drain of PMOS transistor M4 via node n2 and the output of inverter 7 is connected to the input of inverter 6.
In this particular example, the value of resistor R1 is identical to that of resistor R2, and BGREF equals 1.2V. For these values, the node OPC is at a low voltage, close to GND for VDD<2.4. When VDD>2.4V, node n1 is greater than BGREF, and the current in NMOS transistor M1 is greater than the current in NMOS transistor M2. The current in NMOS transistor M1 is mirrored from PMOS transistor M5 to PMOS transistor M4, which forces the comparator output OPC to a high state, close to VDD. The inverters 6 and 7 buffer this signal to the general output OP, which is a logical signal indicating that VDD>2.4 when it is high.
In order to function properly, the accurate comparator assumes that BGREF is at a stable voltage, meaning that VDD is sufficiently high to allow BGREF to function.
Reference is now made to
The illustrated BGREF circuit comprises three branches, headed by PMOS transistors XA1A, XA1B and XA1C, whose sources are all connected to VDD. PMOS transistors XA1A and XA1B form a current mirror, wherein the gates of PMOS transistors XA1A and XA1B are connected together and the drain of PMOS transistor XA1B is connected to its gate. The gate of PMOS transistor XA1A is connected to the power-up circuit 8. The drains of PMOS transistors XA1A and XA1B are connected to the drains of NMOS transistors XA2A and XA2B.
NMOS transistors XA2A and XA2B form a current mirror, wherein the gates of NMOS transistors XA2A and XA2B are connected together and the drain of NMOS transistor XA2A is connected to its gate, which is also connected to the power-up circuit 8. The source of NMOS transistor XA2A is connected to a diode D1. The source of NMOS transistor XA2B is connected to a diode D2 via a resistor R1.
The gate of PMOS transistors XA1C is connected to the gate of PMOS transistor XA1B. The drain of PMOS transistor XA1C is connected to a diode D3 via a resistor R2. The output of the BGREF circuit is designated as OP.
As is known in the art, in order for the BGREF circuit to turn on, VDD must be sufficiently high for each transistor and diode in the circuit to turn on. For a transistor to turn on, its Vgs (gate-source voltage) must be above Vtn (threshold for NMOS) or Vtp (threshold for PMOS), which may be 0.7V (although not necessarily this value). The Vtn and Vtp parameters are very process dependent and can vary independently of each other. The transistor Vgs must have sufficient overdrive (Vdsat), which may be 0.2V, to drive its current. The transistor Vds (drain-source) voltage must be above Vdsat to be in the saturation regime. The diode voltages must be above Vd, which may be 0.7V.
Thus in the branch of PMOS transistor XA1A, VDD must be above Vtn+Vd+2*Vdsat. For the PMOS transistor XA1B branch, VDD>Vtp+Vd+2*Vdsat. In the output branch of PMOS transistor XA1C, the output should be at 1.2V, thus VDD>1.2V +Vdsat. It is apparent that Vtn, Vtp, and Vd all may play a critical role in determining the minimum supply voltage of the BGREF.
Reference is now made to
The circuitry of
It is clear that the circuit of
The present invention seeks to provide a novel power-up system and BGREF level comparator, as is described more in detail hereinbelow. In one embodiment, the present invention seeks to provide a BGREF level comparator whose trip point is a function of all of the parameters in BGREF, and is scaled to BGREF in all process corners, providing a logical signal that BGREF has sufficient VDD voltage to be operational.
There is thus provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention circuitry including a BGREF comparator including a plurality of MOS transistors (e.g., a differential pair of NMOS transistors) that compare a resistor divided supply voltage to a function (e.g., an average or weighted average) of at least two process parameter voltages.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention the process parameter voltages include a threshold voltage Vtn for an NMOS transistor of a BGREF circuit, a threshold voltage Vtp for a PMOS transistor of the BGREF circuit, and a diode voltage Vd of the BGREF circuit.
Further in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention one or more legs of the differential pair may be degenerate, and one or more branches of the degenerate leg may receive a process parameter voltage at its input.
Still further in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a power-up circuit is provided to turn on a BGREF circuit at a supply voltage at which the BGREF circuit is operational. The BGREF comparator and the power-up circuit may power up a non-volatile memory circuit to perform a read operation.
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
Reference is now made to
Power-up system 10 may comprise a CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) level comparator C1 whose output is input to a BGREF level comparator C2, described hereinbelow with reference to
The circuitry of CMOS level comparator C1 is well known in the art. Some examples include those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,534,804; 5,612,642 or 6,005,423.
CMOS level comparator C1 may provide a reset for the chip and for all of the comparators in the power-up system 10 when VDD is less than the threshold voltage Vt. This reset may be necessary, because below the threshold voltage Vt, all voltages in the chip are not well defined. When VDD is sufficiently above Vt, the CMOS level comparator C1 provides a signal cmos_ok, which indicates that the BGREF level comparator C2 can turn on. The BGREF level comparator C2 outputs a logical signal bgref_ok at a VDD level at which the BGREF circuit 12 may function. Upon output of the logical signal bgref_ok, the BGREF circuit 12 becomes enabled, and the accurate level comparator C3 becomes enabled.
There may be a small delay (maybe 1 μs) between enabling of the BGREF circuit 12 and enabling of the accurate level comparator C3 to allow BGREF to turn on. The accurate comparator outputs an OK signal VDD—2.4_OK when VDD>2.4V.
Reference is now made to
In the illustrated embodiment of BGREF level comparator C2, NMOS transistor M2 (
BGREF level comparator C2 compares a resistor divided VDD to a function of Vtn, Vtp and Vd. The illustrated embodiment compares the resistor divided VDD to an average or a weighted average of Vtn, Vtp and Vd, but the invention is not limited to an average and other functions may be used. In the illustrated embodiment, the comparison may be accomplished by using a differential pair with a degenerate leg. The differential pair is formed by NMOS transistor M1 on one side and a degenerate leg comprising NMOS transistors M2A, M2B and M2C on the other side. Each of the NMOS transistors M2A, M2B and M2C are referred to as the branches of the degenerate leg.
The current of the degenerate leg M2A depends on the voltage level at node n6, which in turn depends on the process parameter Vd. The current of the degenerate leg M2B depends on the voltage at node n5, which in turn depends on the process parameter Vtp. The current of the degenerate leg M2C depends on the voltage at node n4, which in turn depends on the process parameter Vtn.
The trip point of BGREF level comparator C2 may occur when the current in NMOS transistor M1 equals the sum of the currents in NTMOS transistors M2A, M2B and M2C. In general, the BGREF level comparator C2 may compare the resistor divided VDD to some mathematical function of Vtn, Vtp and Vd. Depending on the relative values of NMOS transistors M2A, M2B and M2C, the mathematical function may be a type of average. For example, it is possible to make the mathematical function a weighted average by adjusting the ratios of NMOS transistors M2A, M2B and M2C.
Reference is now made to
It will be appreciated by person skilled in the art that variations of the embodiment described above are possible within the scope of the invention. For example, it is possible to design the BGREF level comparator C2 using a degenerate leg with just two transistors (instead of all three transistors M2A, M2B and M2C), and use only two of the process parameters Vd, Vtn, and Vtp. Such a BGREF level comparator would be useful for other BGREF architectures using only those two parameters. It is further possible to design the BGREF level comparator C2 using a degenerate leg with more than three transistors. It is also possible to increase the degeneracy of the leg and add process parameters.
It will be appreciated by person skilled in the art, that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described herein above. Rather the scope of the present invention is defined only by the claims that follow:
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4961010 | Davis | Oct 1990 | A |
5029063 | Lingstaedt et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5081371 | Wong | Jan 1992 | A |
5142495 | Canepa | Aug 1992 | A |
5142496 | Van Buskirk | Aug 1992 | A |
5276646 | Kim et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5280420 | Rapp | Jan 1994 | A |
5381374 | Shiraishi et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5534804 | Woo | Jul 1996 | A |
5553030 | Tedrow et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559687 | Nicollini et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5581252 | Thomas | Dec 1996 | A |
5612642 | McClintock | Mar 1997 | A |
5636288 | Bonneville et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5663907 | Frayer et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672959 | Der | Sep 1997 | A |
5675280 | Nomura et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5708608 | Park et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5717581 | Canclini | Feb 1998 | A |
5726946 | Yamagata et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5760634 | Fu | Jun 1998 | A |
5808506 | Tran | Sep 1998 | A |
5815435 | Van Tran | Sep 1998 | A |
5847441 | Cutter et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5880620 | Gitlin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5903031 | Yamada et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910924 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5946258 | Evertt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5963412 | En | Oct 1999 | A |
6005423 | Schultz | Dec 1999 | A |
6028324 | Su et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6040610 | Noguchi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6064226 | Earl | May 2000 | A |
6064251 | Park | May 2000 | A |
6075402 | Ghilardelli et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081456 | Dadashev | Jun 2000 | A |
6094095 | Murray et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6107862 | Mukainakano et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118207 | Ormerod et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130572 | Ghilardelli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130574 | Bloch et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6150800 | Kinoshita et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154081 | Pakkala et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157242 | Fukui | Dec 2000 | A |
6188211 | Rincon-Mora et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198342 | Kawai | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208200 | Arakawa | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6246555 | Tham | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252442 | Malherbe | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6285614 | Mulatti et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297974 | Ganesan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6339556 | Watanabe | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353356 | Liu | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356469 | Roohparvar et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359501 | Lin et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6400209 | Matsuyama et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6433624 | Grossnickle et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452438 | Li | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6577514 | Shor et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6608526 | Sauer | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614295 | Tsuchi | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627555 | Eitan et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6654296 | Jang et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6665769 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6677805 | Shor et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
20020145465 | Shor et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030076159 | Shor et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030202411 | Yamada | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040151034 | Shor et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050140405 | Do et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0693781 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0 843 398 | May 1998 | EP |
020001118392 | Apr 2001 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050270089 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |