Precision wire saw including surface modified diamond

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9095914
  • Patent Number
    9,095,914
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 2, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 4, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A wire having a surface and diamond particles bonded to said surface by a bond matrix, wherein each diamond particle has surface roughness of about 0.60 to about 0.80 and a sphericity of about 0.25 to about 0.50.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1(
a) is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a conventional diamond coated wire.



FIG. 1(
b) is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a conventional diamond coated wire after use.



FIG. 2(
a) is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of conventional diamond particles used in conventional diamond coated wires.



FIG. 2(
b) illustrates conventional diamond particles in a conventional diamond coated wire.



FIG. 3(
a) is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of surface modified diamond particles.



FIG. 3(
b) illustrates surface modified diamond particles in a coated wire application.



FIG. 4(
a) is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a conventional diamond particle.



FIG. 4(
b) is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a surface modified diamond particle.



FIG. 5(
a) is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a wire containing conventional diamond particles made according to Example 1.



FIG. 5(
b) is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a wire containing surface modified diamond particles made according to Example 1.



FIG. 5(
c) is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a wire containing conventional diamond particles made according to Example 1 after use.



FIG. 5(
d) is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a wire containing surface modified diamond particles made according to Example 1 after use.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Definitions

In describing and claiming the present invention, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set forth below.


The term “abrasive”, as used herein, refers to any material used to wear away softer material.


The term “wire”, as used herein, refers to a cylindrical, elongated string of material. The material may be metal, composite materials, or a combination of metals and/or composite materials. Composite materials may include KEVLAR materials, carbon materials and combinations thereof. Wire may be a single strand or include multiple strands.


The term “exposure”, as used herein, refers to:

Relative Exposure=100(tc0−tb0)/tc0
Space between cutting point and bond surface=tc0−tb0


Where tc0 is the initial height of the abrasive particle from the wire surface to the outermost tip of the particle that would be in contact with the workpiece and tb0 is the initial average thickness of the bonding layer.


The term “chemical bond”, as used herein, refers to a surface to which metallic or organic molecular groups have been chemically adsorbed.


The term “bond” or “bond matrix”, as used herein, refers to the material that is used for attaching the abrasive particles to the wire. The attachment can be mechanical, chemical or a combination of both.


The term “coating”, as used herein, refers to a material that envelops the abrasive particles either partially or entirely. The coating may be metallic, polymeric, vitreous or combinations of these by layer or by mixture.


The term “conventional diamond” as used herein, refers to any diamond not subject to the process taught in U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/097,422 and/or U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/187,789.


The term “surface roughness”, as used herein, refers to the measurement of a two-dimensional image that quantifies the extent or degree of pits and spikes of an object's edges or boundaries as stated in the CLEMEX image analyzer, Clemex Vision User's Guide PE 3.5 ©2001. Surface roughness is determined by the ratio of the convex perimeter divided by the perimeter.







Surface





Roughness

=

ConvexPerimeter
Perimeter





Note that as the degree of pits and spikes increases, the surface roughness factor decreases.


The term “sphericity”, as used herein, refers to the estimate of the enclosed area of a two dimensional image or object (4πA) divided by the square of perimeter (p2).






Sphericity
=


4

π





A


p
2






The term “surface area” as used herein, refers to the external surface of a particle. When used with a plurality of particles, i.e., powder, the term specific surface area is used and is reported as surface area per gram of powder.


It is important to note that although the terms defined above refer to measuring two-dimensional particle profiles using microscopic measuring techniques, it is understood that the features extend to the three-dimensional form. Automated image analysis of particle size and shape is recognized by one skilled in the art as a reliable, reproducible method of measuring particle characteristics. Although the CLEMEX image analyzer was used, similar devices are available that will reproduce the data.


There exists a need for a diamond particle that is resistant to pulling out of the bond matrix on a diamond coated wire. Further, there exists a need for diamond particles that will remain in the bond matrix for an extended time period compared to conventional diamond particles. Additionally, there exists a need to cut materials such as silicon ignot, more efficiently, at increased speeds. Comparative FIG. 1(a) shows a wire 2 containing conventional diamond particles 4 protruding from electroplated bond matrix 6. Comparative FIG. 1(b) shows the wire 2 after it has been used for cutting silicon. Note the absence of conventional diamond particles in the used wire and pock marks 8 where conventional diamond particles were pulled out.


When looking at conventional diamond coated wires, it is quite apparent that the conventional diamond particles are mechanically retained. In the case of an electroplated bond matrix as shown in comparative FIGS. 1(a) and 1(b), the electroplated nickel bond matrix does not chemically bond to the surfaces of the conventional diamond particles and, similarly, resin does not chemically bond with the carbon in the diamond.


Referring to comparative FIG. 2(a), the surfaces of conventional diamond particles are shown at 10. As shown in FIG. 2(a), the particles are relatively smooth as a result of fracture along crystal planes due to the milling and micronizing process used in manufacturing micron-sized diamond particles. Comparative FIG. 2(b) illustrates a wire 14 having a surface 16 including conventional diamond particles 18 bonded to the surface by a bond matrix 20. As depicted in FIG. 2(b), due to the relatively smooth surfaces 22 of conventional diamond particles 18, a significant thickness of bond matrix, at least as thick as half of a particle diameter, is necessary for sufficiently anchoring the conventional diamond particles 18 in the bond matrix 20. In this case, the exposure of the conventional diamond particles would be at least about 50% or less.


In FIG. 3(a), surface modified diamond particles are shown at 12. The surface modified particles 12 in FIG. 3(a) have channels, inlets and pits which permit the bond matrix to penetrate and fill the channels, inlets and pits to provide a stronger mechanical anchor for the surface modified diamond particles in the bond matrix.


The surface modified diamond particles 12 may be used in a fixed abrasive wire having abrasives fixed thereon for use in cutting, slicing, internal grinding, dicing and ingot-cutting of such rigid materials as silicon, quartz, ceramics and the like.


The larger exposure provided by the surface modified diamond particles will provide for a better free cutting ability than wire containing conventional diamond particles and results in reduced heat generation at the cutting points. It is also expected that the increased area between the abrasive cutting points and the bond surface will provide a larger channel for cuttings and swarf removal and will be less erosive than wire containing conventional diamond particles.


The overall effect of using surface modified diamond particles that have a higher material removal rate than conventional diamond particles is that a lower concentration of diamond particles could be used on the wire. This, coupled with the ability of using less bond material to affix the diamond particles, will significantly reduce the cost of producing the wire.


It is also expected that by using surface modified diamond particles, less particles will be required to achieve the same amount of cutting/material removal as opposed to using conventional diamond particles.



FIG. 3(
b) illustrates wire 24 having a surface 26 and surface modified diamond particles 28 bonded to surface 26 by bond matrix 30. Each surface modified diamond particle has a surface roughness of about 0.60 to about 0.80 and a sphericity of about 0.25 to about 0.50. As shown in FIG. 3(b), less bond matrix material is required as compared to FIG. 3(a). The advantages are further discussed below.


As the wire is used in a cutting application and swarf is generated, the bond layer will typically erode away at a rate faster than the diamond particles wear away. In the case of FIG. 3(a) above, as the bond material wears away, the exposure of the conventional diamond particles may increase to some extent, however, at some point, the particles will simply fall out of the bond material because there will not be sufficient amount of bond material for anchoring the particles.


Suitable wire materials include metals, alloys of metal, polymers (synthetic or natural), carbon, textiles, organic or inorganic fibers, silk and combinations thereof. In one embodiment, steel wire such as piano wire, may be used. Other alternatives include metal wires such as tungsten wire or molybdenum wire. In one embodiment, the wire includes a coating or bond matrix that is metal-plated, i.e., a nickel-plated bond matrix. Other alternative materials that may be used as a bond matrix include metallic materials, polymeric resins, hybrid systems (vitreous and polymer), electrolytic nickel coatings, electroless nickel coatings, braze-bond systems and resin-bond systems that may further include thermo-set resins and/or UV curable resins. Additionally, combinations of the above bond matrix materials may be used.


In addition to the bond matrix, in one embodiment, the wire may include additional coatings such as metals or resins. Such metals and resins and their combinations may be selected from those mentioned above.


The wire may have a length of between about 1 cm to about 1000 km or alternatively, about 200 km to about 600 km. In one embodiment the wire is in a continuous loop. The thickness of the wire may be between about 10 um to about 500 um or alternatively, about 50 um to about 200 um.


The superabrasives used in one embodiment of the present invention are the surface modified diamond particles taught in U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/097,422 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/187,789 both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.


The abrasives used in/on the wire may be coated abrasives. Such coatings include, but are not limited to, metal coatings, metal alloy coatings and combinations thereof. Examples of such coatings include chromium, titanium, copper, molybdenum, nickel and tungsten,


Some embodiments of the invention include, but are not limited to, the following:


A wire including surface modified diamond particles incorporated, at least partially, into a wire.


A wire including surface modified diamond particles and conventional diamond particles incorporated, at least partially, into a wire.


A wire including a surface having surface modified diamond particles incorporated into a surface on the wire. The surface modified diamond particles are bonded to the surface of the wire surface by a bond matrix.


A wire including a surface having surface modified diamond particles and conventional diamond particles incorporated, at least partially, into a surface on the wire. The surface modified diamond particles are bonded, at least partially, to the surface of the wire by a bond matrix.


Any method may be used to affix the abrasive particles to the wire or push the diamond at least partially into a wire. The fixed abrasive wire may be made by methods such as electroplating, physically pushing the diamond into the wire, laser conditioning, brazing, affixing the particles using a resin, and impregnating the diamond into the wire.


In an embodiment, electrochemical deposition may be used to deposit the abrasive directly onto the wire substrate. Electrochemical deposition generally calls for placing an electrically charged wire in a bed of abrasive particles in an oppositely charged liquid solution of a metal compound. As metal precipitates on the wire, it captures abrasive particles within a thin metal layer and thereby binds the abrasive to the wire. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,438,973 to Schmid et al., discloses diamond abrasive particles fixed in nickel plating to a cutting surface of a tear-drop cross section stainless steel wire core.


In an embodiment, the abrasive particles may also be affixed to a wire by a brazed metal bond, wherein the grains are disposed upon the surface of the wire with a preselected surface distribution as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 6,102,024.


In an embodiment, the abrasive particles may be affixed to a wire by a resin bond. An example of a suitable resin bond is taught in U.S. Pat. No. 6,463,921.


In addition to the improved bond strength and abrasive exposure, the use of surface modified diamond particles also provides for substantially more cutting points per particle than conventional diamond particles. As shown in FIG. 4(a), diamond particles produced using the modification process display 2 to 3 times the number of cutting points than conventional milled diamond particles as shown in FIG. 4(b). These additional cutting points provide each surface modified diamond particle with a much higher capacity for material removal than conventional monocrystalline diamond particles. Also, it has been demonstrated that the overall friability or toughness of the surface modified diamond particle is only reduced by a factor of 5 to 10 percent after the modification process. Therefore the effective life of the diamond particle within the tool will not be diminished.


As shown in FIG. 3(b) less bond matrix material is required than for the comparative example shown in FIG. 3(a). In FIG. 3(b), bond matrix material fills the pits and indentations of the surface modified diamond particles anchoring the particles in the bond matrix material. As a result, less bond matrix material is required. Using less bond matrix material provides for a greater distances between the exposed tip of the diamond particle and the surface of the bond matrix. This distance will allow for more particle exposure and also allows more space for the swarf and coolant to pass between the workpiece and the wire.


Since the extreme roughness of the surface modified diamond particles provide substantially more anchoring sites than conventional monocrystalline diamond particles, it is apparent that a lower level of bond matrix would be required to provide a superior bond of the surface modified diamond particles to the wire.


The fixed abrasive wire may be used to cut any materials. Common substrate materials include silicon, sapphire, silicon carbide, aluminum nitride, tellurium, silica, gallium arsenide, indium phosphide, cadmium sulfide, germanium, zinc sulfide, gray tin, selenium, boron, silver iodide, and indium antimonide, among other materials.


One embodiment includes a method for cutting a substrate, comprising the steps of: providing a wire saw that includes a cutting wire including surface modified diamond particles; applying a coolant or lubricant to the cutting wire; contacting a surface of the substrate with the cutting wire; and manipulating the relative positioning of the cutting wire and the surface consistent with a cutting action.


In one embodiment, a wire including the surface modified diamond particles and a coolant or lubricant fluid may be used. The coolant or lubricant fluid can be aqueous or nonaqueous. Suitable fluids include water and alkylene glycols. Alkylene glycols used in the context of the present invention include ethylene glycol (EG), polyethylene glycol (PEG), and polypropylene glycol (PPG).


In an embodiment, the bond matrix may additionally include additives selected from the group of abrasives, i.e., materials having a Mohs hardness of greater than seven or an absolute hardness of greater than about 100 and superabrasives having a hardness on the Knoop scale in excess of about 3,000 kg/mm2. A comparison of Knoop and Mohs hardness values for conversion purposes is available in standard handbooks.


Other additives to the bond matrix may include polymeric fibers, inorganic fibers, lubricants, curing agents, fillers, porosity agents, metals and combinations thereof may be used.


In an embodiment the wire may contain functionalized diamond particles such as those taught in U.S. Pat. No. 6,372,002 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The functionalized diamond particles may be present on a wire with surface modified diamond particles. Optionally, the surface modified diamond particles may be subjected to the functionalizing process as taught by U.S. Pat. No. 6,372,002.


EXAMPLES
Example 1

Steel wires were coated with nominal 20-30 micron mean size diamond particles using the following procedure.


Bath Preparation:

    • 1. To a 2 liter glass beaker, the following was added:
      • a. 60 ml Niklad AR767 (nickel sulfate solution) sold by MacDermind Co. Denver, Colo.
      • b. 800 ml de-ionized water
    • 2. The beaker was placed on a hot plate and the solution heated to 70° C.
    • 3. When solution reached 70° C., 150 ml of Niklad B (sodium hypophosphite) solution was added.
    • 4. When the bath was heated to the desired temperature of 85-90° C., it was held at that temperature to prepare wire for coating.


Wire Cleaning:

    • 1. Several pieces of 0.150 mm diameter high carbon steel (C1085 steel) wire were cut to lengths of about 3 feet.
    • 2. The group of wires was weighed and the weight was recorded to determine the weight % of the composite coating (nickel+diamond).
    • 3. The wires were placed into a 1 liter beaker containing 250 ml HCL and 250 ml de-ionized water
    • 4. The wires soaked in the acid/de-ionized water solution for approximately 5 min (to minimize weight loss) until acid solution turned yellow.
    • The “cleaned” wires were quickly removed from the beaker and rinsed with de-ionized water and placed into the hot nickel bath solution.


Coating Process:

    • 1. When placed into the nickel solution beaker, the wire coil expanded on the bottom of the beaker.
    • 2. 20 grams of GMM 20-30 micron conventioanl synthetic industrial diamond powder manufactured by Diamond Innovatios, Worthington, Ohio was added to the bath and the coating start time was recorded.
    • 3. Every 5 minutes, the solution was manually stirred with a glass rod to get the diamond suspended up into bath and away from the wire. After a brief stirring, the diamond was allowed to settle back onto the wire.
    • 4. Every 15 minutes, 6 ml of Niklad 767AR and 6 ml Niklad 767 HpH (sodium hypophosphite solution) were added to replenish the bath.
    • 5. The coating process was continued for a total of 3 hours.
    • 6. After three hours, the wire was removed from the bath and the hot plate was turned off.
    • 7. The coated wires were rinsed with de-ionized water, dried and weighed and recorded to determine the weight % of the composite coating (nickel+diamond).


Several lengths of wire were then coated using 20-30 um surface modified diamond following the same procedure as above.


Scanning electron microscope images were taken of sections of each wire. FIG. 5(a) shows the coated wire made with conventional 20-30 micron diamond particles and FIG. 5(b) shows the coated wire made with surface modified 20-30 micron diamond particles. As can be seen in FIG. 5(a), the conventional diamond particles appear to range from fully embedded within the nickel matrix to just touching the surface of the nickel. The conventional diamond particles appear to be uniformly distributed over the surface of the wire. On average, there appears to be a relatively large number of conventional diamond particles protruding from the surface of the wire where at least 50% of the conventional diamond particles are exposed from the nickel coating.



FIG. 5(
b) also shows good coverage of the surface modified diamond particles over the wire surface and good protrusion of the surface modified diamond particles from the wire surface. The surface modified diamond particles are distinctly different from the conventional diamond particles of FIG. 5(a). FIG. 5(b) clearly shows that the nickel penetrates into the pore spaces, pits and voids of the surface modified diamond particles. It can also be seen from FIG. 5(b) that there are additional cutting points associated with each of the surface modified diamond particles as compared to the conventional diamond particles.


Example 2

A simple sawing test was performed using a) a wire containing the conventional 20-30 um diamond particles; and b) a wire containing surface modified 20-30 um diamond particles. Each wire was secured into a hand saw and used to cut a polysilicon block.


The test included the following steps:

    • 1.) One strand of approximately 16 inches of wire were obtained for each type of diamond (a) and b)).
    • 2.) One end of wire a) was looped around a loosened bolt on one end of a hand saw and tightened.
    • 3.) The other end of the wire a) was looped around another loosened bolt, drawn tight and the bolt was tightened.
    • 4.) The wire was further tightened by turning an adjustment screw on the top of the saw. The wire a) was adjusted to a tension such that approx 1-2 mm of deflection was observed when the saw was held against the silicon block.
    • 5.) After the wire a) was secured into the saw, the wire was placed against a ½ inch×2 inch×3 inch block of polysilicon that was held in a vice. A notch was made on the corner of the block by dragging the wire against the corner. When the notch was established, a few drops of water were placed onto this area to act as a coolant.
    • 6.) A cut was made into the polysilicon block by advancing and retracting the saw using a stroke of approx 8 inches. Only the weight of the saw was used as a downforce.
    • 7.) Cutting was continued with occasional additions of water until 100 strokes were completed.
    • 8.) After the test was completed, wire a) was rinsed with water and a small section in the middle of the saw was removed for SEM analysis.
    • 9.) This test was repeated using the above steps for wire b).


As can be seen from scanning electron photographs of the tested of the wires in FIGS. 5(c) and 5(d), the contact side of both wires is clearly seen where the wire was abrading against the polysilicon block. FIG. 5(c) shows that there is virtually no diamond left on the wire that used the conventional milled 20-30 um diamond particles. It is also clear that many of the particles on the sides of the wire have been pulled out of the metal bond. FIG. 5(d) shows that there are still diamond particles remaining on the working side of the wire that was against the polysilicon. Also, although some of the surface modified diamond particles have pulled out of the bond matrix, many more are still embedded within the matrix than with the regular diamond wire.


Equivalents

Although the invention has been described in connection with certain exemplary embodiments, it will be evident to those of ordinary skill in the art that many alternatives, modifications, and variations may be made to the disclosed invention in a manner consistent with the detailed description provided above. Also, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that certain aspects of the various disclosed example embodiments could be used in combination with aspects of any of the other disclosed embodiments or their alternatives to produce additional, but not herein explicitly described, embodiments incorporating the claimed invention but more closely adapted for an intended use or performance requirements. Accordingly, it is intended that all such alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit of the invention are encompassed within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A wire comprising: a surface; andsurface modified diamond particles bonded to said surface by a bond matrix, wherein each diamond particle has a surface roughness of about 0.60 to about 0.80 and a sphericity of about 0.25 to about 0.50.
  • 2. The wire of claim 1, wherein said wire comprises a material selected from the group of metals, polymers (synthetic or natural), carbon, and alloys of metals, textiles, organic or inorganic fibers, silk and combinations thereof.
  • 3. The wire of claim 2, wherein said metal is selected from the group of iron, steel, stainless steel, nickel and/or alloys and combinations thereof.
  • 4. The wire of claim 1, wherein said bond matrix is selected from the group of metallic materials, polymeric resins, hybrid systems (vitreous+polymer) and combinations thereof.
  • 5. The wire of claim 1, wherein the length of said wire is between about 1 cm to about 1000 km.
  • 6. The wire of claim 5, wherein the length of said wire is between about 200 cm to about 600 km.
  • 7. The wire of claim 1, wherein said wire is a continuous loop.
  • 8. The wire of claim 1, wherein said wire has a diameter or thickness of between about 10 um and about 500 um.
  • 9. The wire of claim 8, wherein said wire has a diameter or thickness of between about 50 and about 200 um.
  • 10. The wire of claim 1, further comprising a coating.
  • 11. The wire of claim 1, wherein said diamond particles further comprise a coating.
  • 12. The wire of claim 11, wherein said coating is metal or resin.
  • 13. The wire of claim 1, wherein the average exposure of said diamond particles is at least about 20%.
  • 14. The wire of claim 13, wherein the average exposure of said diamond particles is between about 30% to about 60%.
  • 15. The wire of claim 1, further comprising additives in said bond matrix selected from the group of abrasives superabrasives, surface functionalized diamond particles, polymeric fibers, inorganic fibers, lubricants, curing agents, fillers, porosity agents, metals and alloys of metals, and combinations thereof.
  • 16. A wire comprising: surface modified diamond particles incorporated into said wire;wherein each diamond particle has surface roughness about 0.60 to about 0.80 and a sphericity of about 0.25 to about 0.50.
  • 17. A wire comprising: diamond particles incorporated into said wire; anddiamond particles bonded to said surface by a bond matrix,
  • 18. A method of fabricating a wire comprising superabrasive particles comprising the steps: providing a wire;cleaning said wire;coating said wire with superabrasive particles having a surface roughness of about 0.60 to about 0.80 and a sphericity of about 0.25 to about 0.50.
  • 19. An apparatus for cutting comprising: a first means for cutting an object, wherein said first means has a surface roughness of about 0.60 to about 0.80 and a sphericity of about 0.25 to about 0.50;a second means for retaining said first means; anda third means for supporting said second and first means.
  • 20. A method for cutting a material comprising the steps of: providing a wire comprising a surface and diamond particles bonded to said surface by a bond matrix, wherein each diamond particle has surface roughness of about 0.60 to about 0.80 and a sphericity of about 0.25 to about 0.50;cutting through the surface of said material by dragging the wire through the material;indexing the wire or object such that the wire is continuously cutting through said material forming a cutting zone;providing a coolant and/or lubricant into said cutting zone while said wire is cutting said material.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the cutting speed of the wire is about 0.1 m per second to about 20 m per second.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The instant application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/097,422 filed on Sep. 16, 2008 and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/187,789 filed on Jun. 17, 2009 which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/US2010/044148 8/2/2010 WO 00 12/3/2013
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2011/014884 2/3/2011 WO A
US Referenced Citations (53)
Number Name Date Kind
3762882 Grutza Oct 1973 A
3919717 Cullen et al. Nov 1975 A
3936577 Christini et al. Feb 1976 A
3955324 Lindstrom May 1976 A
4036937 Roy et al. Jul 1977 A
4122636 Roy et al. Oct 1978 A
4328266 Feldstein May 1982 A
4358923 Feldstein Nov 1982 A
4547407 Spencer, Jr. Oct 1985 A
4681817 Shinada Jul 1987 A
4805586 Borse Feb 1989 A
4919974 McCune et al. Apr 1990 A
4951953 Kim Aug 1990 A
4997686 Feldstein et al. Mar 1991 A
5035771 Borse Jul 1991 A
5096465 Chen et al. Mar 1992 A
5145517 Feldstein et al. Sep 1992 A
5472787 Johnson et al. Dec 1995 A
5482637 Rao et al. Jan 1996 A
5547716 Thaler Aug 1996 A
5597625 Ong et al. Jan 1997 A
5695387 Moravec et al. Dec 1997 A
5891523 Feldstein Apr 1999 A
6070570 Ueoka et al. Jun 2000 A
6102024 Buljan et al. Aug 2000 A
6138779 Boyce Oct 2000 A
6194068 Ohashi et al. Feb 2001 B1
6254461 Benning et al. Jul 2001 B1
6280489 Horie et al. Aug 2001 B1
6306466 Feldstein et al. Oct 2001 B1
6357433 Whalin Mar 2002 B1
6372002 D'Evelyn et al. Apr 2002 B1
6404207 Bhushan Jun 2002 B1
6500488 Chang et al. Dec 2002 B1
6503642 Linde Jan 2003 B1
6515254 Beck et al. Feb 2003 B2
6565618 Ishizuka May 2003 B1
6915796 Sung Jul 2005 B2
7134868 Babin et al. Nov 2006 B2
7377477 Lucek et al. May 2008 B2
7556558 Palmgren Jul 2009 B2
7562858 Dumm et al. Jul 2009 B2
8118898 Wakamiya Feb 2012 B2
20010033804 An Oct 2001 A1
20040112867 Horie et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040162014 John Aug 2004 A1
20060040126 Richardson et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060246275 Dumm et al. Nov 2006 A1
20090064983 Sudarshan Mar 2009 A1
20090120422 Taniguchi May 2009 A1
20100064593 Dumm et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100068524 Dumm et al. Mar 2010 A1
20120100366 Dumm et al. Apr 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (15)
Number Date Country
0212879 Nov 1989 EP
2038214 Jul 1980 GB
A-59059352 Sep 1982 JP
S-62213965 Sep 1987 JP
A-2118080 Oct 1988 JP
2003175406 Jun 2003 JP
2009-090441 Apr 2009 JP
200831407 Apr 2008 TW
9502078 Jan 1995 WO
9706339 Feb 1997 WO
9928084 Oct 1999 WO
0060137 Dec 2000 WO
02062530 Aug 2002 WO
2005011914 Feb 2005 WO
20020522 Apr 2003 ZA
Non-Patent Literature Citations (14)
Entry
Sonin et al., The action of iron particles at catalyzed hydrogenation of {100} and {110} faces of synthetic diamond, Diamond and Related Materials, vol. 12 (2003) 1559-1562, Elsevier.
Sonin, Interaction of Fine Fe Particles with Structural Defects on {111} Faces of Synthetic Diamond Crystals in a Hydrogen Atmosphere, Inorganic Materials, vol. 40, No. 1, 2004, pp. 20-22.
Chepurov. The channeling action of iron particles in the catalyzed hydrogenation of synthetic diamond. Diamond and Related Materials, vol. 9, (2000), pp. 1435-1438.
Evans, T. et al. Etching of Diamond Surfaces with Gases. Philosophical Magazine, vol. 6. 1961, pp. 429-440.
Mennig, G. Wear in Plastics Processing, Chapter 2. Metals and Wear Resistant Hardfacings; p. 171, Hanser Publilshers, New York, NY, 1990.
Apachitei, I, et al. Electroless Ni-P Composite Coatings: The Effect of Heat Treatment on the Microhardness of Substrate and Coating, Scripts Materials, vol. 38, No. 9, pp. 1347-1353, Elsevier Sciences,Ltd. 1958.
Feldstein, et al. Composite Electroless Nickel Coating for the Gear Industry, Gear Technology, The Journal of Gear Manufacturing, 1997.
Feldstein, Composite Electroless Plating, Chapter 11, Electroless Plating: Fundamentals and Applications, American Electroplaters and Surface Finishers Society, 1990.
Palumbo et al. Electrodeposited Nanocrystalline Coatings for Hard-Facing Applications, AESF SUR/FIN (R) Proceedings, p. 686, 2002 Proceedings.
Hamid et al. Development of electroless nickel-phosphorus composite deposits for wear resistance of 6061 aluminum alloy, Material Letters, 57, 2002, p. 720.
Wang et al. Scuffing and wear behavior of aluminum piston skirt coatings against aluminum cylinder bore, Wear, 225, 1999.
Bozzini et al. Relationships among crystallographic structure, mechanical properties and tribological behavior of electroless Ni-P (9%) B4C films, Wear, 1999 p. 225-229.
Bunshah, Handbook of Hard Coatings, Noyes 2001, p. 452.
IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Low Porosity Plating Method for Sintered Powered Metals, vol. 38, No. 8, Aug. 1995, pp. 445-447.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140165804 A1 Jun 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61230125 Jul 2009 US