This application is a national stage of, and claims priority to, Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/EP2017/081121, filed on Dec. 1, 2017, which application claims priority to German Application No. DE 10 2016 014 920.5, filed on Dec. 14, 2016, which applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
The disclosure relates to an application device for the application of an application medium onto a component, preferably for application of a paint onto a motor vehicle body component, having at least two nozzle rows, wherein the at least two nozzle rows have in each case several nozzles for the output of application medium jets (e.g. continuous application medium jets and/or droplet jets comprising several droplets).
With regard to the general prior art, reference can initially be made to DE 10 2014 006 991 A1, US 2005/0 243 112 A1, EP 1 764 226 A1 and EP 1 852 733 A1.
Rotary atomisers are normally used as the application device for series painting of motor vehicle body components, which rotary atomisers have, however, the disadvantage of a limited degree of application efficiency so that only a part of the applied paint is deposited on the components to be coated, while the rest of the applied paint must be disposed of as so-called overspray.
U.S. Pat. No. 9,108,424 B2 discloses a drop-on-demand valve-jet printer with several valve openings (nozzles), the mode of action of which is based on the use of electric valves. Here, in each case a magnetic piston is guided in a coil and lifted up by the supply of current into the coil. In particular, the area outputs required in the automated series painting of high-value components, e.g. motor vehicle bodies, cannot usually be achieved by drop-on-demand printing techniques. The term print head can therefore also be replaced by the term nozzle applicator. It is apparent from
One problem is that the individual nozzles of a nozzle row cannot currently mechanically be manufactured to be as narrow as desired, in particular if single valves are installed, as is normal e.g. in the case of drop-on-demand valve-jet printers because required distances between nozzles, coils, actuating lever, armatures, etc. lead to a minimum distance between the individual nozzles. The minimum distances can be so large that one nozzle row on its own does not lead to a closed coating medium film. By rotating the print head, as already stated above, under certain circumstances, a closed coating medium film can be achieved, but the track width is nevertheless also significantly reduced by the rotation, which leads to a reduced area output.
One measure to increase the area output seems initially that several print heads are arranged behind one another and are arranged offset with respect to one another in the longitudinal direction of the nozzle rows.
Such an arrangement would, however, be disadvantageous in particular in the case of the application robot-based painting of motor vehicle bodies because a joint rotation of the print heads required e.g. depending on the component geometry about a joint central axis by the application robot leads to uneven nozzle distances between the nozzles of the individual nozzle rows, which can be inferred from
It can be inferred from
The disclosure relates to an application device for application of an application medium onto a component, preferably for the application of a paint onto a motor vehicle body component.
The application device includes at least one print head for application of the application medium preferably in series and e.g. for mounting on an application robot. The at least one print head can include e.g. a first print head and at least one further print head.
The application device includes at least two nozzle rows, which are preferably movable, in particularly jointly movable, by the application robot.
The at least two nozzle rows include a first nozzle row with several nozzles for the output of application medium jets (e.g. continuous application medium jets and/or droplet jets comprising droplets) and at least one further nozzle row with several nozzles for the output of application medium jets (e.g. continuous application medium jets and/or droplet jets comprising droplets). The application device can thus have in particular at least two, at least three, at least four or even at least five nozzle rows.
The application device is characterised in particular in that at least one nozzle row of the at least two nozzle rows is movable, for the purpose of position adjustment, in particular position correction, of the nozzles of the first nozzle row and the nozzles of the at least one further nozzle row. The first nozzle row and/or the at least one further nozzle row can thus be movable. The application device can consequently include, for the purpose of position adjustment, at least one, at least two, at least three or even at least five movable nozzle rows.
The position adjustment serves in particular to correct a rotation of the at least two nozzle rows caused by the application robot, in particular its wrist axis.
The rotation of the at least two nozzle rows is carried out e.g. about a rotational axis perpendicular to the component.
The disclosure creates an expedient technical/mechanical solution by means of which it can be ensured that several nozzle rows can be used and the several nozzle rows can be rotated in particular jointly by an application robot, wherein an incorrect position resulting from the rotation can be corrected by the position adjustment in the context of the disclosure.
The application device according to the disclosure includes in particular examples in which a position adjustment of individual nozzle rows (e.g. on a print head) and/or individual print heads to one another are enabled in order to correct the position of the at least two nozzle rows so that a furthermore substantially homogeneous application image can be maintained evenly with preferably all the nozzle distances, jet distances and/or droplet tracks. Substantially all the jet distances can become narrower or wider as a result of the rotation caused by the application robot, but all the distances preferably remain substantially evenly spaced apart as a result of the position adjustment (correction) of the nozzle rows.
The rotation of the at least two nozzle rows caused by the application robot is preferably carried out about an axis of rotation which is arranged substantially centrally relative to the at least two nozzle rows and/or is oriented substantially parallel to the application medium jets of the at least two nozzle rows, which encompasses e.g. a rotation about the Z-axis (or another axis) in the case of horizontal painting.
The at least one print head corresponds to an applicator for preferably serial application of the application medium and for mounting on an application robot. The term applicator used herein can include one or more print heads.
For optimum application with one or more print heads with individual nozzles which are arranged in a row, the position adjustment of the nozzle rows is useful or even necessary for e.g. one of the following functions. The application device thus includes one or more of the following advantageous properties:
It is possible that the at least one movable nozzle row is movable in order to correct a rotation, which can be generated by the application robot, of the at least two nozzle rows so that the nozzle distances between the nozzles, and thus expediently the application medium jets, of the first nozzle row and the nozzles, and thus expediently the application medium jets, of the at least one further nozzle row are spaced apart substantially evenly from one another.
It is alternatively or additionally possible that, as a result of a rotation, which can be generated by the application robot, of the at least two nozzle rows, the expediently changeable nozzle distances between the nozzles, and thus expediently the application medium jets, of the first nozzle row, and the nozzles, and thus expediently the application medium jets, of the at least one further nozzle row become larger or smaller, but are substantially evenly spaced apart from one another as a result of the position adjustment.
The position adjustment preferably enables a relative movement between the at least two nozzle rows, e.g. in contrast to the variant shown in
The rotation, which can be generated by the application robot, of the at least nozzle rows can be carried out e.g. about a common rotational axis and preferably by a wrist axis of the application robot.
Despite a rotation, which can be generated by the application robot, of the at least two nozzle rows, the position adjustment can preferably enable substantially uniform nozzle distances between the nozzles of the first nozzle row and the nozzles of the at least one further nozzle row.
Alternatively or additionally, e.g. despite a rotation, which can be generated by the application robot, of the at least two nozzle rows, the position adjustment can enable a maintenance of homogeneity, which is sufficient in particular for motor vehicle painting, of the application medium films which can be generated by the application medium on the component.
The nozzle distances correspond e.g. to nozzle distances perpendicular to the preferably translational movement direction of the at least one print head.
The rotation of the at least two nozzle rows is preferably carried out by one axis of the wrist axis of the application robot.
It is important here that the device for position adjustment of the at least two nozzle rows is supported at a point of the axis of rotation or the wrist axis which is not influenced by the rotational movement.
The at least one movable nozzle row is preferably movable in addition to the movement with the application robot.
It is possible that the at least one movable nozzle row is rotatable and has an axis of rotation.
The axis of rotation can be positioned e.g. substantially centrally with respect to the at least one movable nozzle row, in particular in its longitudinal and/or transverse direction, or eccentrically with respect to the at least one movable nozzle row, in particular in its longitudinal and/or transverse direction.
It is possible that the axis of rotation is positioned e.g. on the longitudinal axis of the movable nozzle row and/or outside or inside the at least one movable nozzle row. It is possible that several nozzle rows are rotatable and have in each case their own axis of rotation.
The individual axes of rotation can be e.g. evenly spaced apart from one another and/or arranged in a preferably linear row.
The at least one movable nozzle row can preferably be longitudinally displaceable along its longitudinal extent and indeed as an alternative or in addition to a rotatability function.
It is possible that the application device includes a displacing and/or rotating mechanism for expediently direct or indirect movement of the at least one movable nozzle row.
It is possible, as mentioned above, that the first nozzle row and/or the at least one further nozzle row is/are movable for the purpose of position adjustment of the nozzles of the first nozzle row and the nozzles of the at least one further nozzle row.
It is possible that the application device, for the purpose of position adjustment, includes at least one motor, preferably electric motor, for expediently direct or indirect movement of the at least one movable nozzle row.
The at least one motor can include e.g. a sliding/linear motor, rotary motor and/or servo motor.
It is possible that one and the same motor serves the purpose of expediently direct or indirect joint movement of the first nozzle row and the at least one further nozzle row so that, for the purpose of position adjustment, the first nozzle row and the at least one further nozzle row are movable. In this case, a motor can therefore be used to move at least two nozzle rows.
It is also possible that a first motor serves to move the first nozzle row and at least one further motor serves to move the at least one further nozzle row so that, for the purpose of position adjustment, the first nozzle row and the at least one further nozzle row are movable. In this case, single motors can therefore be used to move at least two nozzle rows.
It is possible that, for the purpose of position adjustment, the first nozzle row and the at least one further nozzle row are connected to one another via at least one connection, preferably a master/slave connection and/or a mechanical coupling connection. As a result of this, e.g. a synchronisation of the movements of the first nozzle row and the at least one further nozzle row can be brought about. Alternatively or additionally, it can be brought about that a movement of the first nozzle row causes a corresponding movement of the at least one further nozzle row or vice versa.
The first nozzle row and the at least one further nozzle row can also be actuated individually for the purpose of position adjustment.
The application device can, for the purpose of position adjustment, have at least one of the following: at least one parallelogram mechanism (e.g. connection of the print heads and/or nozzle rows to supported webs and displacement resulting from this), at least one contour curve, at least one cam disc, at least one transmission apparatus, preferably with axles, and/or at least one involute toothing (e.g. involute transmission).
The application device can include at least one control apparatus for calculating adjustment values for the position adjustment and preferably serve to control the movements of the at least one movable nozzle row and/or for control of the application robot. The motor of the handling device (robot) transfers the position data to software which generates from it correction commands for the correction motor(s).
It is possible that the at least one movable nozzle row is fitted on a print head as disclosed herein.
For the purpose of position adjustment, the at least one movable nozzle row can be movable e.g. relative to its print head.
For the purpose of position adjustment, the at least one movable nozzle row can, however, also be movable e.g. jointly with its print head so that the at least one movable nozzle row is preferably arranged in a stationary manner relative to its print head and/or the movement of the at least one movable nozzle row is caused by a movement of its print head.
In the context of the disclosure, therefore at least one movable nozzle row can be movable relative to the print head, on which it is mounted, for the purpose of position adjustment. Alternatively or additionally, in the context of the disclosure, at least one movable nozzle row can also, however, be movable together with the print head, on which it is mounted, for the purpose of position adjustment.
The first nozzle row and the at least one further nozzle row can be arranged e.g. on one and the same print head and movable relative to its print head.
The application device can have a first print head as disclosed herein and at least one further print head as disclosed herein.
The first print head can preferably include the first nozzle row and the at least one further print head can include the at least one further nozzle row.
It is possible that the first nozzle row is movable relative to the first print head. Alternatively, the first nozzle row can be jointly movable with the first print head so that e.g. the first nozzle row is arranged in a stationary manner relative to the first print head and/or the movement of the first nozzle row is caused by a movement of the first print head.
It is possible that the at least one further nozzle row is arranged to be movable relative to the at least one further print head. Alternatively, the at least one further nozzle row can be jointly movable with the at least one further print head so that e.g. the at least one further nozzle row is arranged in a stationary manner relative to the at least one further print head and/or the movement of the at least one further nozzle row is caused by a movement of the at least one further print head.
The first print head and/or the at least one further print head can have at least one nozzle row, preferably, however, at least two e.g. movable nozzle rows.
The first print head and the at least one further print head can be held e.g. by a holder apparatus and form in particular a multiple print head unit.
The first print head and the at least one further print head serve in particular the purpose of mounting on one and the same application robot.
The holder apparatus, for the purpose of position adjustment, can enable an e.g. translational and/or rotational degree of freedom of movement for the first print head and/or for the at least one further print head.
It is possible that the first nozzle row and the at least one further nozzle row are offset with respect to one another in their longitudinal direction and/or the nozzles of the first nozzle row and the nozzles of the at least one further nozzle row do not overlap.
The first nozzle row and the at least one further nozzle row can e.g. be arranged behind one another offset orthogonally with respect to their longitudinal direction and/or substantially orthogonal for the expediently translational direction of movement of the at least one print head.
It is possible that the first nozzle row and the at least one further nozzle row remain oriented substantially parallel to one another despite position adjustment, i.e. are oriented parallel to one another in particular before and after a position adjustment.
It is possible that the first nozzle row is arranged in a first nozzle plate and the at least one further nozzle row is arranged in a separate second nozzle plate, preferably spaced apart from the nozzle plate of the first nozzle row.
It is possible that single valves for control of the application medium output from the individual nozzles of the first nozzle row and/or the individual nozzles of the at least one further nozzle row are provided, wherein the single valves have in each case a movable valve element (e.g. armature or valve needle) in order to close the respective nozzle in a closing position and release it in an opening position, and have in each case a preferably electromechanical drive, preferably a coil/restoring element drive, for movement of the valve element. The single valves are expediently arranged in the at least one print head.
The valve drives preferably operate electromechanically (e.g. electromagnetically or piezoelectrically).
The valve drives include in each case preferably an electric coil or a piezo-actuator for actuation of the valve element.
It is possible that the valve drives include in each case a preferably elastic restoring element for actuation of the valve element.
The application medium jets of the first nozzle row and/or the at least one further nozzle row can include continuous application medium jets and/or droplet jets (comprising several e.g. substantially round or elongated droplets).
In order to generate a droplet jet, e.g. the coil and the restoring element (e.g. a spring) can ensure that the valve element is moved to and fro between the opening position and the closing position. The droplet jet is expediently present between the at least one nozzle and the component.
In order to generate a continuous application medium jet, e.g. the coil or the piezo-actuator can retain the valve element permanently in the opening position. The restoring element can move e.g. the valve element in idle phases into the closing position, wherein, during application of the applications medium, the valve element is expediently retained permanently in the opening position. The continuous application medium jet is expediently present between the at least one nozzle and the component.
The application medium can be e.g. viscous, highly viscous or structurally viscous, preferably with a viscosity of more than 15 mPas, more than 30 mPas, more than 60 mPas, more than 100 mPas or more than 130 mPas and/or preferably with a viscosity of less than 400 mPas or less than 200 mPas or less than 150 mPas (measured at a shear rate of 1000 s−1) and/or a paint.
The at least one print head can expediently include the print head and/or the at least one further print head.
The at least one print head may have at least one of the following features:
It should be mentioned that the first nozzle row and/or the at least one further nozzle row can include a plurality of nozzles (e.g. more than 5, more than 10 or even more than 15 nozzles and optionally a corresponding number of associated individual valves).
It should furthermore be mentioned that the term used in the context of the disclosure of the at least one “print head” is to be understood generally and merely serves the purpose of delimiting atomisers (e.g. rotation atomisers, disc atomisers, airless atomisers, airmix atomisers and/or ultrasound atomisers) which generate a spray mist of the application medium to be applied. In contrast to this, the print head according to the disclosure generates preferably at least one, in particular a plurality of spatially narrowly restricted application medium jets.
It should furthermore be mentioned that the at least two nozzle rows preferably serve to apply a paint (e.g. base coat, clear coat, water-based paint and/or solvent-based paint). However, they can alternatively also be configured for the application of other application media, in particular coating media, such as, for example, for the application of sealant, insulant, adhesive, primer, etc., just to mention a few examples.
The application distance between the nozzles and the component surface is preferably at least 4 mm, 10 mm, 20 mm or 40 mm and/or at most 200 mm or 100 mm.
The disclosure also can include an application robot, preferably a coating or painting robot, with at least one application device as disclosed herein.
The application robot expediently serves to guide one or more print heads and thus the at least two nozzle rows and can have e.g. at least five or at least six movable robot axes.
The disclosure also comprises an application method, preferably carried out by an application device as disclosed herein.
The application method serves to apply an application medium onto a component, preferably to apply a paint onto a motor vehicle body component, wherein at least one print head applies the application medium preferably in series and is mounted on an application robot, and at least two nozzle rows are moved by the application robot, wherein the at least two nozzle rows include a first nozzle row with several nozzles for the output of application medium jets and at least one further nozzle row with several nozzles for the output of application medium jets.
The application method is above all characterised in that at least one nozzle row of the at least two nozzle rows is moved for the purpose of position adjustment of the nozzles of the first nozzle row and the nozzles of the at least one further nozzle row.
The preferred examples of the disclosure described with reference to the figures partially correspond, wherein similar or identical parts are provided with the same reference signs, and for the explanation of which reference is also made to the description of other examples or figures in order to avoid repetitions.
For the sake of clarity, only in each case one nozzle, only one associated application medium jet and only a few nozzle distances are usually provided with reference signs in the figures.
Application device V serves to apply an application medium onto a component, preferably for application of a paint onto a motor vehicle body component.
Application device V includes a print head 100 for serial and atomisation-free and thus in particular substantially overspray-free application of the application medium. Print head 100 serves the purpose of mounting on an application robot.
Print head 100 includes three nozzle rows 1, 2, 3 which can be moved by the application robot.
A first nozzle row 1 is incorporated into a first nozzle plate P1 and includes five nozzles 1.1 for the output of application medium jets S1.
A second nozzle row 2 is incorporated into a second nozzle plate P2 and includes five nozzles 2.1 for the output of application medium jets S2.
A third nozzle row 3 is incorporated into a third nozzle plate P3 and includes five nozzles 3.1 for the output of application medium jets S3.
Reference sign M designates the expediently translational direction of movement of print head 100 and thus of nozzle rows 1, 2, 3.
The three nozzle rows 1, 2, 3 are fitted on one and the same print head 100.
During an application process, it is normally necessary that print head 100 and thus nozzle rows 1, 2, 3 have to be rotated e.g. depending on the component geometry about a joint rotational axis, which is indicated in
The “geometry” can also be generated by switching on or off. However, “steps” in the size of the nozzle distance in the paint are then visible. If this is not acceptable or good enough for the optical solution for the painted part, only rotation then remains as a solution.
A rotation X of print head 100 together with nozzle rows 1, 2, 3, without the position adjustment explained later, would lead to a nozzle row positioning similar to e.g. as shown on the right in
The at least three nozzle rows 1, 2, 3 are thus movable in order to enable a position adjustment of nozzles 1.1 of first nozzle row 1, nozzles 2.1 of second nozzle row 2 and nozzles 3.1 of third nozzle row 3. The position adjustment allows, in contrast to the example shown e.g. in
The movability function of the three nozzle rows 1, 2, 3 makes it possible for a rotation X of the three nozzle rows 1, 2, 3 generated by the application robot to be corrected so that the changeable nozzle distances S between nozzles 1.1 of first nozzle row 1, nozzles 2.1 of second nozzle row 2 and nozzles 3.1 of third nozzle row 3 become evenly spaced apart from one another.
Nozzle distances S correspond to the nozzle distances perpendicular to translational direction of movement M of print head 100.
It indeed follows from rotation X that nozzle distances S between nozzles 1.1, nozzles 2.1 and nozzles 3.1 can become larger or smaller. They can, however, nevertheless be kept evenly spaced apart from one another by the position adjustment.
Despite a rotation X generated by the application robot, the position adjustment enables even nozzle distances S between nozzles 1.1 of first nozzle row 1, nozzles 2.1 of second nozzle row 2 and nozzles 3.1 of third nozzle row 3.
Despite rotation X, the position adjustment enables maintenance of homogeneity of the application medium film on the component generated by the application medium.
The three nozzle plates P1, P2, P3 including associated nozzle rows 1, 2, 3 are rotatable for the purpose of position adjustment.
First nozzle row 1 is thus rotatable about a first axis of rotation D1 arranged centrally with respect to first nozzle row 1. Second nozzle row 2 is rotatable about a second axis of rotation D2 arranged centrally with respect to second nozzle row 2. Third nozzle row 3 is rotatable about a third axis of rotation D3 arranged centrally with respect to third nozzle row 3. The three axes of rotation D1, D2, D3 are evenly spaced apart from one another and arranged in a row.
The three nozzle rows 1, 2, 3 are connected to one another via a parallelogram mechanism for the purpose of position adjustment and/or as a guide mechanism, which parallelogram mechanism furthermore ensures a synchronised and thus even movement of nozzle plates P1, P2, P3 and thus of nozzle rows 1, 2, 3.
A control, e.g. robot control software, could, depending on the angle of rotation, calculate and correspondingly correct the paint impact points on the surface so that the existing track data are correspondingly recalculated, i.e. a correction of the displacement of the paint impact points and a correction of the tracks since the track width changes. This leads to more or fewer tracks which can be automatically corrected or even generated. This applies to any type of rotation. Also in the case of only one nozzle row.
The three nozzle rows 1, 2, 3 can, as already mentioned, be fitted on one and the same print head 100. Nevertheless, another example is also possible which is represented by the reference signs in brackets in
E.g. first nozzle row 1 can thus be fitted on a first print head 100. Second nozzle row 2 can be fitted on a second print head 101. Third nozzle row 3 can be fitted on a third print head 102.
The following variants are possible individually or in combination with one another in order to achieve the movability function and/or position adjustment:
Respective nozzle row 1, 2, 3 is movable relative to its print head 100, 101, 102.
Respective nozzle row 1, 2, 3 is jointly movable with its print head 100, 101, 102 so that respective nozzle row 1, 2, 3 is arranged in a stationary manner relative to its print head 100, 101, 102 and the movement of respective nozzle row 1, 2, 3 is caused by a movement of its print head 100, 101, 102.
It is consequently apparent that, in the context of the disclosure, for the purpose of position adjustment, at least one nozzle row can expediently be movable relative to its print head and/or at least one nozzle row can be movable jointly with its print head.
One particular feature of the example shown in
First nozzle row 1 includes thirteen nozzles 1.1 for the output of thirteen application medium jets S1.
Second nozzle row 2 includes thirteen nozzles 2.1 for the output of thirteen application medium jets S2.
Third nozzle row 3 includes thirteen nozzles 3.1 for the output of thirteen application medium jets S3.
Fourth nozzle row 4 includes thirteen nozzles 4.1 for the output of thirteen application medium jets S4.
In
S designates the nozzle distances between nozzles 1.1, nozzles 2.1, nozzles 3.1 and nozzles 4.1.
B designates the track width.
In
Individual nozzle rows 1, 2, 3, 4 can nevertheless also be driven separately by single drives for the purpose of position adjustment. In this case too, the coupling connection can ensure a uniform, synchronised movement of nozzle rows 1, 2, 3, 4.
One feature of the example shown in
The distances of the application medium impact points to one another and the track width become smaller, but the distances become equal across the entire track width. In particular a uniform layer thickness distribution and an optimal painting result follow from this.
D designates the nozzle distances between nozzles 1.1, nozzles 2.1, nozzles 3.1 and nozzles 4.1.
E designates the track width.
The following applies with regard to
The following applies with regard to
The following applies with regard to
First nozzle row 1 is rotatable about an eccentric, first axis of rotation D1, which is, however, arranged on the longitudinal axis of first nozzle row 1. Second nozzle row 2 is rotatable about an eccentric, second axis of rotation D2, which is, however, arranged on the longitudinal axis of second nozzle row 2. Third nozzle row 3 is rotatable about an eccentric, third axis of rotation D3, which is, however, arranged on the longitudinal axis of third nozzle row 3. Fourth nozzle row 4 is rotatable about an eccentric, fourth axis of rotation D4, which is, however, arranged on the longitudinal axis of fourth nozzle row 4. Axes of rotation D1, D2, D3, D4 are arranged in a row.
In one particular example, axes of rotation D1, D2, D3, D4 lie on a line. This line can point parallel to the painting direction.
In
Nozzle plates 1, 2, 3, 4 are of identical design, but arranged offset with respect to one another in their longitudinal direction so that individual uneven offsets X-Y-Z are present for each nozzle plate 1, 2, 3, 4.
A further particular feature is that axes of rotation D1, D2, D3, D4 are in each case arranged eccentrically with respect to respective nozzle row 1, 2, 3, 4, but nevertheless on the longitudinal axis of respective nozzle row 1, 2, 3, 4 and in a row with one another.
In
Application robot R preferably includes at least five or at least six movable robot axes and serves to guide one or more print heads 100 and thus in particular also to guide at least two nozzle rows 1, 2, as disclosed herein. The at least one print head 100 serves the purpose of atomisation-free application in series of the application medium onto a component T in the form of a motor vehicle body. A rotation X of the at least one print head 100 is performed by the wrist axis of the application robot with support on the robot mechanism.
Drive 21 includes an electric coil 22 for actuation of valve element 20 as a function of the energisation of coil 22, in particular for actuation of valve element 20 into the opening position. Drive 21 further includes an elastic restoring element 23, e.g. a spiral spring, for actuation of valve element 20 into the closing position.
The application medium to be applied is supplied to nozzles 1.1 via an application medium supply 24 in print head 100. Application medium supply 24 is (in
Plate 25 has, coaxially with respect to nozzle 1.1, an opening on which a coil tube 26 is placed coaxially, wherein coil tube 26 is wound with coil 22.
A magnetic coil core 27, which at the upper end of coil tube 26 in
Moreover, valve element 20, which is displaceable in the direction of the double arrow, is located in sections in coil tube 26, wherein the movement of valve element 20, as already mentioned, is dependent on the energisation of coil 22.
Restoring spring 23 pushes valve element 20 into the closing position if coil 22 is de-energised.
In a first mode of operation, coil 22 can hold valve element 20 permanently in the opening position, for generation of a continuous application medium jet. Restoring element 10 expediently serves to move valve element 20 in idle phases into the closing position.
In a second mode of operation, coil 22 and restoring element 23 can ensure that valve element 20 is moved to and fro between the opening position and the closing position with high frequency, in order to generate a droplet jet having separate droplets.
It should generally also be mentioned that the points of impact of the application medium jets resulting during the application process, which application medium jets can be realised in the context of the disclosure as continuous application medium jets and/or droplet jets comprising droplets, preferably have the same central distance to one another, so that a homogeneous application medium film can be produced during running (spreading) of the application medium on the component.
The disclosure is not restricted to the preferred exemplary examples described above. On the contrary, a plurality of variants and modifications are possible which also make use of the concept of the disclosure and thus fall into the scope of protection. The disclosure also encompasses various aspects of the disclosure which enjoy protection independently of one another.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2016 014 920.5 | Dec 2016 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/081121 | 12/1/2017 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/108572 | 6/21/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3421694 | Muller | Jan 1969 | A |
3717306 | Hushon et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3981320 | Wiggins | Sep 1976 | A |
4141231 | Kudlich | Feb 1979 | A |
4375865 | Springer | Mar 1983 | A |
4383264 | Lewis | May 1983 | A |
4423999 | Choly | Jan 1984 | A |
4430010 | Zrenner et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4435719 | Snaper | Mar 1984 | A |
4478241 | Cardenas-Franco | Oct 1984 | A |
4555719 | Arway et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4593360 | Cocks | Jun 1986 | A |
4668948 | Merkel | May 1987 | A |
4714044 | Kikuchi | Dec 1987 | A |
4734711 | Piatt et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4826135 | Mielke | May 1989 | A |
4894252 | Bongen et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4941778 | Lehmann | Jul 1990 | A |
4974780 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4985715 | Cyphert | Jan 1991 | A |
5050533 | Zaber | Sep 1991 | A |
5072881 | Taube, III | Dec 1991 | A |
5429682 | Harlow, Jr. | Jul 1995 | A |
5435884 | Simmons et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5538221 | Joswig | Jul 1996 | A |
5556466 | Martin et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5602575 | Pauly | Feb 1997 | A |
5636795 | Sedgwick et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5647542 | Diana | Jul 1997 | A |
5659347 | Taylor | Aug 1997 | A |
5681619 | Ogasawara | Oct 1997 | A |
5740967 | Simmons et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5843515 | Crum et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5951882 | Simmons et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964407 | Sandkleiva | Oct 1999 | A |
5976343 | Schlaak | Nov 1999 | A |
6164746 | Akahira | Dec 2000 | A |
6179217 | Yoshida et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6325302 | Guzowski | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6540835 | Kim et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6607145 | Boriani et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6641667 | Ochiai et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6712285 | Provenaz et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6777032 | Ogasahara et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6811807 | Zimmermann et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6849684 | Poppe et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7160105 | Edwards | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7178742 | Nellentine et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7182815 | Katagami et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7244310 | Edwards | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7270712 | Edwards | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7357959 | Bauer | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7387071 | Heinke et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7449070 | Fellingham | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7604333 | Horsnell | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7757632 | Edwards | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7837071 | Achrainer | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7901741 | Katagami et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8028651 | Rademacher et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8118385 | Van De Wynckel et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8449087 | Kataoka et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8545943 | Frankenberger et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8652581 | Merchant | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8678535 | Beier et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8875655 | Pettersson et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8882242 | Beier et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9010899 | Harjee | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9108424 | Wallsten et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9140247 | Herre et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9156054 | Ikushima | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9266353 | Beier et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9393787 | Ikushima | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9464573 | Remy et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9592524 | Fritz et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9701143 | Ikushima | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9707585 | Reimert et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9844792 | Pettersson et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9901945 | Fehr et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9914150 | Pettersson et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10016977 | Stefani et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10105946 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10150304 | Herre et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10252552 | Pitz et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10272677 | Stefani et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10464095 | Fritz | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10532569 | Wallsten et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10814643 | Herre | Oct 2020 | B2 |
11504735 | Fritz | Nov 2022 | B2 |
20010006392 | Otsuki | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010017085 | Kubo | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010019340 | Kubo et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020024544 | Codos | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020043280 | Ochiai et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020043567 | Provenaz et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020105688 | Katagami | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020109741 | Okabe | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128371 | Poppe et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030020783 | Sanada | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030041884 | Bahr | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030049383 | Ogasahara et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063154 | Goto | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040028830 | Bauer | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040089234 | Hagglund et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107900 | Clifford et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123159 | Kerstens | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040173144 | Edwards | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040221804 | Zimmermann et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040231594 | Edwards | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040238522 | Edwards | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040256501 | Mellentine et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261700 | Edwards | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050000422 | Edwards | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015050 | Mowery et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050016451 | Edwards | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023367 | Reighard et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050156963 | Song | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050243112 | Kobayashi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060061613 | Fienup et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068109 | Frankenberger et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060146379 | Katagami et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060238587 | Horsnell | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251796 | Fellingham | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070062383 | Gazeau | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070292626 | Larsson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080271674 | Rademarcher | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080309698 | Nakano et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090027433 | Van De Wynckel et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090029069 | Edwards | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090117283 | Herre | May 2009 | A1 |
20090181182 | Sloan | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090244216 | Niimi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100132612 | Achrainer | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100156970 | Ikushima | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100170918 | Achrainer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100225685 | Kwon et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100279013 | Frankenberger et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100282283 | Bauer | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100321448 | Buestgens et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110014371 | Herre et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110084150 | Merchant | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110248046 | Simion | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110262622 | Herre | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120085842 | Ciardella | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120105522 | Wallsten | May 2012 | A1 |
20120114849 | Melcher | May 2012 | A1 |
20120162331 | Kataoka | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120186518 | Herre | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120219699 | Pettersson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120249679 | Beier et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120282405 | Herre | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130201243 | Yoshida | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215203 | Chen | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130257984 | Beier et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130284833 | Fritz et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140076985 | Pettersson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140120457 | Choi | May 2014 | A1 |
20140184683 | Harjee | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140242285 | Pettersson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140329001 | Rouaud et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150009254 | Kaiba et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150042716 | Beier et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150086723 | Bustgens | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150098028 | Ohnishi | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150328654 | Schwab | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150375258 | Fritz et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150375507 | Kushima | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160052312 | Pitz et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160074822 | Han | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160288552 | Ikushima | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160306364 | Ikushima et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170087837 | Stefani et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170106393 | Hamspon et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170128962 | Kashiyama et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170136481 | Fritz et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170252765 | Medard | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170267002 | Pitz et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170299088 | Rau | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170361346 | Lahidjanian et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180022105 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180056670 | Kerr | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180093491 | Murayama et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180178505 | Stefani et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180222186 | Stefani et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180250955 | Herre | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190091712 | Medard et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2287527 | Aug 1998 | CN |
1331661 | Jan 2002 | CN |
1411914 | Apr 2003 | CN |
1438942 | Aug 2003 | CN |
1512919 | Jul 2004 | CN |
1176815 | Nov 2004 | CN |
1668386 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1761530 | Apr 2006 | CN |
101264698 | Sep 2008 | CN |
101309755 | Nov 2008 | CN |
101657264 | Feb 2010 | CN |
101784348 | Jul 2010 | CN |
102177002 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102198434 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102971080 | Mar 2013 | CN |
103153483 | Jun 2013 | CN |
103909743 | Jul 2014 | CN |
104613205 | May 2015 | CN |
104994966 | Oct 2015 | CN |
105358259 | Feb 2016 | CN |
205042649 | Feb 2016 | CN |
106414081 | Feb 2017 | CN |
1284250 | Nov 1968 | DE |
7710895 | Sep 1977 | DE |
3045401 | Jul 1982 | DE |
3221327 | Sep 1983 | DE |
3225554 | Jan 1984 | DE |
3634747 | Aug 1987 | DE |
3804092 | Sep 1988 | DE |
4013322 | Oct 1991 | DE |
4115111 | Nov 1991 | DE |
4138491 | May 1993 | DE |
9405600 | Jun 1994 | DE |
68924202 | Feb 1996 | DE |
19606716 | Aug 1997 | DE |
19630290 | Jan 1998 | DE |
19731829 | Jan 1999 | DE |
19743804 | Apr 1999 | DE |
9422327 | Mar 2000 | DE |
19852079 | May 2000 | DE |
19936790 | Feb 2001 | DE |
20017629 | Mar 2001 | DE |
10048749 | Apr 2002 | DE |
69429354 | May 2002 | DE |
69622407 | Mar 2003 | DE |
10307719 | Sep 2003 | DE |
60001898 | Feb 2004 | DE |
102004021223 | Dec 2004 | DE |
10331206 | Jan 2005 | DE |
102004034270 | Feb 2006 | DE |
102004044655 | Mar 2006 | DE |
102004049471 | Apr 2006 | DE |
60212523 | Feb 2007 | DE |
69836128 | Aug 2007 | DE |
60125369 | Oct 2007 | DE |
102006021623 | Nov 2007 | DE |
102006056051 | May 2008 | DE |
102007018877 | Oct 2008 | DE |
60132100 | Dec 2008 | DE |
102007037663 | Feb 2009 | DE |
10 2008 018 881 | Sep 2009 | DE |
102008053178 | May 2010 | DE |
102009029946 | Dec 2010 | DE |
102009038462 | Mar 2011 | DE |
102010004496 | Jul 2011 | DE |
102010019612 | Nov 2011 | DE |
102012006371 | Jul 2012 | DE |
102012005087 | Oct 2012 | DE |
102012005650 | Sep 2013 | DE |
102012212469 | Jan 2014 | DE |
102012109123 | Mar 2014 | DE |
202013101134 | Jun 2014 | DE |
102013002412 | Aug 2014 | DE |
102013011107 | Aug 2014 | DE |
102013205171 | Sep 2014 | DE |
102014006991 | Dec 2014 | DE |
102014007523 | Nov 2015 | DE |
102014008183 | Dec 2015 | DE |
10 2014 217 892 | Mar 2016 | DE |
102014012705 | Mar 2016 | DE |
102014013158 | Mar 2016 | DE |
10 2016 014 952 | Jun 2018 | DE |
0138322 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0297309 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0665106 | Aug 1995 | EP |
1120258 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1270086 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1764226 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1852733 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1884365 | Feb 2008 | EP |
1946846 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2002898 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2133154 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2151282 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2196267 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2380744 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2433716 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2468512 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2641661 | Sep 2013 | EP |
2644392 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2777938 | Sep 2014 | EP |
2799150 | Nov 2014 | EP |
2842753 | Mar 2015 | EP |
3002128 | Apr 2016 | EP |
3156138 | Apr 2017 | EP |
3213823 | Sep 2017 | EP |
3257590 | Dec 2017 | EP |
3272669 | Jan 2018 | EP |
3068626 | Oct 2019 | EP |
3010918 | Mar 2015 | FR |
2200433 | Aug 1988 | GB |
2367771 | Apr 2002 | GB |
2507069 | Apr 2014 | GB |
S5722070 | Feb 1982 | JP |
862116442 | May 1987 | JP |
H04-106669 | Sep 1992 | JP |
H0798171 | Oct 1995 | JP |
H09192583 | Jul 1997 | JP |
2000158670 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000317354 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001129456 | May 2001 | JP |
2001157863 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001239652 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001300404 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2005501745 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002361863 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003506210 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003136030 | May 2003 | JP |
2003164780 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004142382 | May 2004 | JP |
2004528956 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2004337710 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005526234 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2007021760 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007152666 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007520340 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2007245633 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007289848 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008110332 | May 2008 | JP |
2009006324 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2010528852 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2010531213 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2010531729 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2010241003 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2011206958 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2012011310 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2012506305 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2012135925 | Jul 2012 | JP |
2012206116 | Oct 2012 | JP |
2012228643 | Nov 2012 | JP |
2012228660 | Nov 2012 | JP |
2013067179 | Apr 2013 | JP |
2013530816 | Aug 2013 | JP |
2013530816 | Aug 2013 | JP |
2013188706 | Sep 2013 | JP |
2014019140 | Feb 2014 | JP |
2014050832 | Mar 2014 | JP |
2014111307 | Jun 2014 | JP |
2015-009222 | Jan 2015 | JP |
2015027636 | Feb 2015 | JP |
2015096322 | May 2015 | JP |
2015520011 | Jul 2015 | JP |
2015193129 | Nov 2015 | JP |
2015535735 | Dec 2015 | JP |
2016507372 | Mar 2016 | JP |
2016526910 | Sep 2016 | JP |
2016175077 | Oct 2016 | JP |
2016175662 | Oct 2016 | JP |
2018012065 | Jan 2018 | JP |
2020513311 | May 2020 | JP |
2020513314 | May 2020 | JP |
8601775 | Mar 1986 | WO |
9856585 | Dec 1998 | WO |
02098576 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03021519 | Mar 2003 | WO |
2003062129 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2004048112 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004085738 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005016556 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005075170 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2006022217 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2007121905 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2009019036 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2010046064 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010146473 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011044491 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011128439 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011138048 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2013121565 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014121916 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2015071270 | May 2015 | WO |
2015096322 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2015186014 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016-087016 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016142510 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2016145000 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2017006245 | Jan 2017 | WO |
2017006246 | Jan 2017 | WO |
2018102846 | Jun 2018 | WO |
2018108565 | Jun 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Final Office Action mailed Mar. 19, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,696 (45 pages). |
Japenese Patent Office Notice of Reasons of Refusal for Application No. JP 2019-531967 mailed Jun. 8, 2021 (8 pages; with English machine translation). |
Chinese Office Action and Search Report for CN201780077603.3 mailed Oct. 12, 2020 (15 pages; English translation not available). |
Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 23, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,694 (163 pages). |
China National Intellectual Property Administration Office Action and Search Report for CN Application No. 201780077018.3 mailed Aug. 27, 2020 (11 pages; Search Report in English). |
Notice of Allowance mailed in U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,689 on Jun. 2, 2021 (38 pages). |
Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 2, 2021 for Application No. CN201780077017.9 (17 pages; with English machine translation). |
Japanese Notification of Reasons for Rejection mailed Jun. 1, 2021 for Application No. JP2019-531944 (14 pages; with English machine translation). |
Japanese Notification of Reasons for Rejection mailed Jun. 8, 2021 for Application No. JP2019-531957 (13 pages; with English machine translation). |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed Jul. 8, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,696 (11 pages). |
Liptak, Bela. (2006). Instrument Engineers' Handbook (4th Edition)—Process Control and Optimization, vol. 2—2.1.3.5 Process Time Constant, (pp. 99-102). Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from https://app.knovel.eom/hotlink/pdf/id:kt00CC7HL1/instrument-engineers/process-time-constant (Year: 2006). |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 6, 2022 for related U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,701 (36 pages). |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Application No. JP2019-532012 mailed Jun. 22, 2021 (6 pages; with English machine translation). |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Application No. JP2019-527330 mailed Jun. 22, 2021 (10 pages; with English machine translation). |
JPO Office Action for Application No. JP2019-531097 mailed Jun. 29, 2021 (10 pages; with English machine translation). |
JPO Office Action for Application No. 2019-531096 mailed Jul. 6, 2021 (9 pages; with English machine translation). |
JPO Office Action for Application No. 2019-531098 mailed Jul. 6, 2021 (5 pages; English translation only). |
JPO Office Action for Application No. 2019-531459 mailed Jul. 6, 2021 (8 pages; with English machine translation). |
Fianl Office Action mailed May 13, 2021 for USPA No. U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,691 (70 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 28, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,693 (109 pages). |
Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 19, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,700 (62 pages). |
JPO Decision to Grant in related application JP2019-532012 mailed Jan. 25, 2022 (6 pages; with English machine translation). |
EPO Official Notification of Opposition for Application No. 17821803.8 mailed Feb. 10, 2021 (64 pages; with English machine translation). |
JPO Decision to Grant in related application No. JP2019-532030 mailed Dec. 1, 2022 (6 pages; English machine translation provided). |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 5, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,701 (80 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 18, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,692 (97 pages). |
JPO Notification of Reasons for Rejection for Application No. JP2019-532030 mailed May 18, 2021 (6 pages; with English translation). |
CIPO Office Action for Application No. CN201780077474.8 mailed Apr. 26, 2021 (17 pages; with English translation). |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 24, 2021 for related U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,693 (19 pages). |
European Search Report for EP20170638.9 mailed Sep. 14, 2020 (4 pages—English translation not available). |
European Search Report for EP20170021.8 mailed Sep. 8, 2020 (11 pages—English translation not available). |
European Search Report for EP20170025.9 mailed Sep. 9, 2020 (4 pages—English translation not available). |
European Search Report for EP20170016.8 mailed Sep. 7, 2020 (4 pages—English translation not available). |
JPO Submission for JP2019-531096; submitted Dec. 21, 2020 (32 pages; with English translation). |
JPO Submission for JP2019-531957; submitted Dec. 21, 2020 (21 pages; with English translation). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,691 mailed Jan. 7, 2021 (79 pages). |
Chinese Office Action for Application No. CN20178007017.9 mailed on Aug. 31, 2020 (8 pages; with English translation). |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,697 mailed Oct. 22, 2020 (78 pages). |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,696 mailed Nov. 2, 2020 (58 pages). |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,689 mailed Oct. 15, 2020 (77 pages). |
Chinese Office Action for CN201780077476.7 mailed Sep. 23, 2020 (12 pages; English translation not available). |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,700 mailed Dec. 1, 2020 (73 pages). |
JPO Decision to Grant mailed Oct. 3, 2021 for Application No. JP2019-532113 (7 pages; with English machine translation). |
Final Office Action mailed Oct. 7, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,693 (58 pages). |
JPO Office Action mailed Jul. 3, 2021 for Application No. JP2019-532024 (12 pages; with English machine translation). |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 27, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,695 (149 pages). |
Ghasem, G. et al; “Chapter 2 Background on Sprays and Their Production”, Industrial Sprays and Atomization: Design, Analysis and Applications, Jan. 1, 2002, Springer, London, pp. 7-33, XP009195118, ISBN: 978-1-4471-3816-7. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081141 mailed Feb. 26, 2018 (17 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081114 mailed May 15, 2018 (33 pages; with English translation). |
Anonymous: “Roboterkalibrierung—Wikipedia”, Nov. 7, 2016, XP055471615, Gefunden im Internet: URL: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roboterkalibrierung&oldid=159460756 [gefunden am Apr. 30, 2018] das ganze dockument (8 pages; with English translation). |
Beyer, Lukas: “Genauigkeitssteigerung von Industrierobotern”, Forschungsberichte Aus Dem Laboratorium Fertigungstechnik/Helmut-Schmidt-Universitat, Universitat Der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Dec. 31, 2005, Seiten 1-4, XP009505118; ISSN: 1860-2886; ISBN: 978-3-8322-3681-6 (13 pages; with English machine translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081108 mailed Feb. 28, 2018 (with English translation; 18 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081099 mailed Feb. 26, 2018 (21 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081102 mailed Mar. 14, 2018 (16 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081105 mailed Feb. 26, 2018 (19 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081152 mailed May 15, 2018 (25 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081098 mailed May 14, 2018 (26 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081101 mailed Feb. 28, 2018 (14 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081121 mailed Feb. 26, 2018 (20 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081117 mailed Mar. 12, 2018 (27 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081123 mailed on Feb. 26, 2018 (20 pages; with English translation). |
Final Office Action mailed Jun. 11, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,701 (53 pages). |
EPO Examination Report for Application No. 201702818.1 mailed Dec. 18, 2020 (with English machine translation; 6 pages). |
EPO Notification of Objection mailed May 18, 2022 for Patent No. EP3718643, related to related U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,693 (55 pages; with English machine translation). |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action in related U.S. Appl. No. 17/532,411 mailed Jan. 13, 2023 (127 pages). |
Chinese Office Action in related application No. CN201780077045.0 mailed Jan. 29, 2022 (17 pages; English machine translation provided). |
Huo Lijiang, “Packaging Printing Technology”, 1st edition, pp. 321-323, Printing Industry Press, Sep. 30, 2011 (10 pages; with English machine translation). |
Chinese Patent Office—Office Action for Application No. CN202211512023.1 mailed Aug. 16, 2023 (26 pages; with English machine translation). |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2023 for related U.S. Appl. No. 17/740,537 (107 pages). |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 26, 2023 for related U.S. Appl. No. 17/965,062 (85 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190337311 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |