Current piezoelectric printheads manufactured for use in commercial printers may utilize double-sided silicon die in order to provide multiple ink drop weights and high nozzle densities. The double-sided die are manufactured by using a photolithographic and etch process to build piezoelectric actuator circuits and fluidic channels for ink dispensing devices on both sides of a silicon wafer. The wafer is then separated into individual double-sided die. The devices manufactured on one side of the silicon wafer must be protected while devices are manufactured on the other side of the silicon wafer, resulting in increased complexity of the manufacturing process and lower yields from each silicon wafer.
As shown in
Die 102 and die 104 may be manufactured from, for example, a silicon wafer or another suitable material, depending on the particular application. For example, die 102 and die 104 may be individual die sections separated (e.g., by sawing or cutting) from an 8 inch diameter round silicon wafer having an industry standard thickness of approximately 757 microns. If example dimensions of 1.5 inches in length by 0.25 inches in width are used for each die, then approximately 96 die may be cut from a single 8 inch diameter silicon wafer. Other wafer sizes and thicknesses are contemplated as well, depending on the particular application.
Die 102 may have a surface 106 and an opposite surface 108. Similarly, die 104 may have a surface 110 and an opposite surface 112. As illustrated in
Ink dispensing devices 114 may be constructed on surfaces 106 and 110 using, for example, a photolithographic process that uses a combination of masking, depositing, and etching steps in order to form electrical circuits, fluidic channels, and other structures that make up the ink dispensing devices 114 for each die on the front surface of a silicon wafer. Individual die, such as die 102 and die 104, may then be separated from the other die on the silicon wafer. By way of example, if dimensions of 1.5 inches in length by 0.25 inches in width are used for each die, then approximately 96 die may be cut from a single 8 inch diameter, 757 micron silicon wafer, where each die includes 96 ink dispensing devices 116 each having a corresponding nozzle 116. Other manufacturing processes may be used as well to create ink dispensing devices 114 depending on the particular application. Similarly, die having differing types, numbers, and sizes of ink dispensing devices 114 and nozzles 116 are contemplated as well, depending on the particular application.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Using two single-sided die in die assembly 100 as opposed to one double-sided die also eliminates the need to construct ink dispensing devices 114 on both sides of a die found on a double-sided printhead die. Constructing ink dispensing devices on both sides of a die requires that the devices manufactured on one side of, for example, a silicon wafer be protected while ink dispensing devices are manufactured on the other side of the silicon wafer. For example, where photolithographic processes are used, a sacrificial layer is often used to protect devices formed on one side of the silicon wafer while devices are constructed on the opposite side, resulting in increased complexity of the photolithographic device construction process. This process can also lead to a large number of device defects, lower die yields from each silicon wafer, increased manufacturing variation, and poor image quality. Using two single-sided die in die assembly 100 as opposed to one double-sided die may eliminate the need for such a sacrificial layer, thus reducing the complexity of the photolithographic process. Using two single-sided die in die assembly 100 as opposed to one double-sided die also reduces number of defects associated with using a sacrificial layer for protection of devices formed on one side of the silicon wafer while devices are constructed on the opposite side, resulting in higher die yields, reduced manufacturing variation, and higher image quality. Using two single-sided die in die assembly 102 also allows for thinner wafers of industry standard thickness (e.g., 725 microns) to be used, as opposed to thicker non-standard wafers that are used in double-sided die (e.g., 1061 microns), which may provide material cost reductions and manufacturing efficiencies.
Printhead die assembly 202 is similar to printhead die assembly 100 shown in
As illustrated in
Printhead 200 may also include a die carrier 230. Die carrier 230 may provide electrical and fluidic connections between printhead die assembly 202 and, for example, a commercial inkjet printer. Die carrier 230 may also provide structural support for printhead die assembly 202. For example, as shown in
Die carrier 230 may include a registration pin 232. Registration pin 232 may be used to provide a reference point from which the position of printhead die assembly may be defined, such as for calibrating a printer in which printhead 230 is used. In particular, registration pin 230 may be used to align die 204 and die 206 within die carrier 230. For example, as shown in
As indicated by a step 404, each of the printhead die may be aligned relative to the registration pin of the die carrier. In some examples, a nozzle of each printhead die may be aligned with the registration pin. In some examples, a nozzle of each printhead die may each be aligned with the registration pin with an accuracy of approximately 8 microns. In some examples, nozzles of each of the printhead die may also be aligned relative to each other. In some examples, nozzles of each of the printhead die may also be aligned relative to each other with an accuracy of approximately 5 microns. In some examples, the desired level of accuracy may be achieved using a die alignment tool having two motorized stages coupled to micro grippers. The die alignment tool may utilize a real-time image processing and optics tool to acquire the position of each printhead die and control the movement of the motorized stages with a repeatability of less than 1 micron and an accuracy of not less than 1.5 microns.
As indicated by a step 406, the position of each of the printhead die may be fixed within the die carrier. For example, an adhesive may be applied such that it is in contact with each of the printhead die and the die carrier to fix the position of each printhead die within the die carrier. The adhesive may be, for example, a UV adhesive or another suitable adhesive. In some examples, a UV adhesive may be applied during or after alignment of each printhead die with the registration pin, and may then be exposed to UV illumination in order to set the adhesive and fix the position of each printhead die within the die carrier. In some examples, a layer of adhesive may be applied between the two printhead die. In some examples, a UV adhesive may also be applied between each of the printhead die prior to step 402 in order to hold each of the printhead die in positions adjacent to each other when mated together. Once each of the printhead die are positioned and aligned as desired, the layer of adhesive may be exposed to UV illumination in order to set the adhesive and fix each of the printhead die in position.
System 500 may include processor 502 and memory 504. Processor 502 may include a single processing unit or distributed processing units configured to carry out instructions contained in memory 504. In general, following instructions contained in memory 504, processor 502 may allow users to separately calibrate the operating voltage of each printhead die as well as an entire array of printheads. For purposes of this application, the term “processing unit” shall mean a presently developed or future developed processing unit that executes sequences of instructions contained in a memory. Execution of the sequences of instructions causes the processing unit to perform steps such as generating control signals. The instructions may be loaded in a random access memory (RAM) for execution by the processing unit from a read only memory (ROM), a mass storage device, or some other persistent storage. In other embodiments, hardwired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions to implement the functions described. For example, the functionality of system 500 may be implemented entirely or in part by one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Unless otherwise specifically noted, system 500 is not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software, nor to any particular source for the instructions executed by the processing unit.
Memory 504 may include a non-transient computer-readable medium or other persistent storage device, volatile memory such as DRAM, or some combination of these; for example a hard disk combined with RAM. Memory 504 may contain instructions for directing the carrying out of functions and analysis by processor 502. In some implementations, memory 504 may further store data for use by processor 502. Memory 504 may store various software or code modules that direct processor 502 to carry out various interrelated actions. In the example illustrated, memory 504 includes a calibration pattern module 510, an acquisition module 520, an analysis module 530, and an adjustment module 540. In some examples, modules 510, 520, 530, and 540 may be combined or distributed into additional or fewer modules. Modules 510, 520, 530, and 540 may cooperate to direct processor 502 to carry out a method 600 set forth by the flow diagram of
As indicated by a step 602, calibration patterns may be generated for each of two printhead die in a printhead by module 510. The calibration patterns may, for example, be printed by a printer in which the printhead is installed.
Referring again to
As indicated by a step 608, operating voltages for each printhead die may be adjusted by adjustment module 540 based on the analysis in step 606. These adjustments may result in performance image quality improvements such as, for example, improved uniformity, more uniform drop weights, improved drop positioning, and correction of nozzle space errors, tilting, and die height differences.
While the embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, although different example embodiments may have been described as including one or more features providing one or more benefits, it is contemplated that the described features may be interchanged with one another or alternatively be combined with one another in the described example embodiments or in other alternative embodiments. One of skill in the art will understand that the invention may also be practiced without many of the details described above. Accordingly, it will be intended to include all such alternatives, modifications and variations set forth within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Further, some well-known structures or functions may not be shown or described in detail because such structures or functions would be known to one skilled in the art. Unless a term is specifically and overtly defined in this specification, the terminology used in the present specification is intended to be interpreted in its broadest reasonable manner, even though may be used conjunction with the description of certain specific embodiments of the present invention.
The present application is a divisional application claiming priority from co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/514,577 filed on Mar. 27, 2017 by Vandenberghe et al. and entitled PRINTHEAD DIE ASSEMBLY, which is a 371 patent application from PCT/US2014/059335 filed on Oct. 6, 2014 by Vandenberghe et al. and entitled PRINTHEAD DIE ASSEMBLY, the full disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5198054 | Drake | Mar 1993 | A |
5734394 | Hackleman | Mar 1998 | A |
6260951 | Harvey | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6286942 | Miyazawa | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6375310 | Arakawa | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6742883 | Takata | Jun 2004 | B1 |
7942497 | Matsumoto | May 2011 | B1 |
8517508 | Amiddon, Jr. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8539586 | Stephenson | Sep 2013 | B2 |
9434162 | Miyata | Sep 2016 | B2 |
20020003559 | Harajiri | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20050062799 | Kitahara et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070019035 | Koseki | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070070103 | Akune | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20100289854 | Hagiwara | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100302311 | Blair et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110148995 | Lee | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157275 | Kubota | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110228002 | Shepherd et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130106954 | Choy et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130201256 | Fricke et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130325678 | Cheng et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140168319 | Moreau | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173737 | Toback et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20160013159 | Kwon | Jan 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10340277 | Nov 2013 | CN |
103442894 | Dec 2013 | CN |
H11-165414 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2001096753 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001310463 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001341298 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2004-058277 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2011-240526 | Dec 2011 | JP |
WO-2013176661 | Nov 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Das, Ruma et al. Software Selection based on Quantitative Security Risk Assessment. CIIS2012. |
United States General Accounting Office. Accounting and Information management Division. Information Security Risk Assessment. Nov. 1999. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200079082 A1 | Mar 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15514577 | US | |
Child | 16684670 | US |