Inkjet printing mechanisms are used in a variety of different products, such as plotters, facsimile machines and printers, collectively referred to herein as inkjet printers. These inkjet printers contain one or more inkjet printheads, also called “pens.” A printhead is fluidically coupled to a reservoir of ink. The function of the print head is to eject minute ink drops, disposed from the ink reservoir, onto a sheet of print media. To print an image, the pen is mounted to a carriage in the printer. The carriage traverses over the surface of a blank sheet of media, and the print head is controlled to eject drops of ink at appropriate times pursuant to commands from a microcomputer or other controller. The timing of the application of the ink drops corresponds to the pattern of the desired image or text to be printed.
The print head ejects the ink drops through nozzles. The particular ink ejection mechanism within the print head may take on a variety of different forms known to those skilled in the art, such as thermal print head technology. In a thermal inkjet system, a barrier layer containing ink channels and vaporization chambers is located between a nozzle orifice plate and a substrate layer. This substrate layer typically contains arrays of heater elements, such as resistors, which are selectively energized to heat ink within the vaporization chambers. Upon heating, an ink droplet is ejected from a nozzle associated with the energized resistor.
Nozzle array designs often include multiple columns of nozzles, with the nozzles in a column having a certain nozzle-to-nozzle spacing. By staggering the nozzles in different columns relative to the print media, nozzles in different columns can print on different rows of the print media, thus allowing a higher resolution image to be formed than would be possible with only a single column of nozzles with that nozzle-to-nozzle spacing.
In some applications, high printing speed may be more important than high image resolution. However, it may be difficult to achieve a desired high printing speed because the printing speed is typically limited by, among other factors, the frequency at which drops can be ejected from a given nozzle.
For these and other reasons, there is a need for the present invention.
A printer with a carriage adapted to receive a printhead capable of printing an ink at an effective nozzle density along a medium advance axis is disclosed. The printhead includes a plurality of substantially parallel columnar arrays of nozzles, each columnar array has an actual nozzle density along the medium advance axis which is less than the effective nozzle density. An alignment structure in the carriage orients the printhead to print at the actual nozzle density along the medium advance axis such that individual nozzles in different ones of the columnar arrays can deposit ink on a print medium in a row substantially orthogonal to the medium advance axis.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention:
The present invention relates to an inkjet printer having a printhead with a nozzle array that is tilted relative to the print medium in order to achieve nozzle redundancy. The nozzles are tilted with respect to the motion of the printhead and the print medium to such a degree as to enable drops from nozzles in different columns to be printed on the same row of a print medium during a single printing pass of the printhead. Tilting the nozzle array relative to the print medium enables the same inkjet pen to be compatible for usage in many different inkjet printer models. Furthermore, greater flexibility in a printer is attained by virtue of having the option of selectively either tilting or not tilting the nozzle array. Depending on the user's dictates, the nozzle array can be tilted by varying degrees to improve speed, reliability, and/or resolution; or not tilted for better print quality. In the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, the present invention may be practiced without these specific details or by using alternate elements or methods. In other instances well known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.
When installed in a printer, the print head 102 is tilted relative to the print medium 101. Instead of having the same X and Y axes as the print medium 101, the X-axis Xp of print head 102 is tilted at an angle (α) relative to the X-axis Xm of the print medium 101. In other words, the print medium 101 has a different X-axis and different Y-axis than the X-axis and Y-axis of print head 102. The goal of this particular embodiment is to tilt print head 102 such that the columns of nozzles of this otherwise staggered nozzle array configuration align vertically relative to the print medium 101 when installed in the printer. In one embodiment, the degree of tilt is approximately two degrees. The reason for this relatively small degree of tilt is because the nozzles are extremely small and are closely spaced together. As a result, a small degree of tilt can produce a rather substantial degree of vertical separation.
By tilting the print head 102 relative to the print medium 101, the nozzles of the left column can be vertically aligned with the nozzles of the right column. In other words, each nozzle in the left column 103 has a corresponding nozzle in the right column 104 which also corresponds to that same X-axis Xm of the print medium. It can be seen that each of the rows 105-107 on the print medium 101 has a corresponding set of two nozzles for ejecting ink onto those respective rows. This nozzle redundancy design is advantageous because if one nozzle were to misfire, clog, or otherwise malfunction, the other nozzle would be available to fire in its place because it is located in the same horizontal position. For example, if one of the nozzles in the right column were to malfunction, the corresponding nozzle in the left column would be able to fire on that same line. Although in some situations this may lead to a slight degradation of the image quality, it nonetheless, is much better than having no functioning nozzles available to print on the row. For instance, rather than missing data for an entire line, the line with the defective nozzle might appear slightly lighter in color. The resultant printout may nonetheless be acceptable to the end user. Otherwise, a malfunctioning nozzle might result in unacceptable print quality. The end user would be forced under those circumstances to replace a relatively expensive cartridge.
Besides offering greater reliability, in another embodiment this design enables faster printing because the firing frequency of the system may essentially be doubled by virtue of having two columns of arrays which can be independently fired. Consequently, tilting this type of nozzle array configuration results in faster and more reliable printing. In yet another embodiment, having two nozzles on the same axis enables the inkjet printer to fire both nozzles on the same paper location in order to increase the spot size. Increasing the spot size is of great significance because a bigger spot appears to be much darker in color. There may be instances where darker colors produces greater contrasts, which leads to sharper, enhanced print quality.
Furthermore, print head 102 can be installed in a non-tilted mode into one inkjet printer model for producing a staggered nozzle output (e.g., for greater resolution in the y-direction Ym of the medium 101). Alternatively, the same print head 102 can be installed in a tilted mode for producing nozzle redundancy in a different inkjet printer model (e.g., for faster printing and/or more reliable printing). This enables the same inkjet cartridge containing the printhead to be used in different inkjet printer types that provide different orientations of the printhead with respect to the print medium. Those inkjet printer models which emphasize image quality and speed can now use the same inkjet cartridge as the inkjet printer models which emphasize improved resolution. Thereby, manufacturers can save production and inventory costs by reducing the number of different types of cartridges needed for supporting the various inkjet printer models. Further, reducing the number of different types of inkjet print cartridges available can reduce consumer confusion.
In yet a further embodiment, a given print head can be oriented in an inkjet printer model in either a non-tilted mode to achieve one set of performance criteria (e.g., greater resolution), or in a tilted mode to achieve a different set of performance criteria (e.g., faster and/or more reliable printing). This confers greater flexibility and versatility to that particular inkjet printer model. It effectively enhances the overall functionality of that inkjet printer. Thereby, that inkjet printer may offer a competitive advantage over other inkjet printers which can orient the printhead in only a single configuration.
In one embodiment, two separate cartridges are incorporated into a single inkjet printer.
As depicted in
Furthermore, in one embodiment, a drop detector 204 detects a failure of one or more nozzles and provides feedback to the printer for automatically switching to a functioning nozzle. Without detection of and compensation for a malfunctioning nozzle, lines associated with malfunctioning nozzles might not be printed, or might be printed with only a portion of the ink intended to be deposited. As a result, these lines would appear lighter in color or would be unprinted. Therefore, having this malfunctioning nozzle compensation feature provides superior image quality. With a drop detector 204, malfunctioning nozzles can be detected and identified. Based on the feedback from examining the ink being deposited, the drop detector 204 determines which nozzles (if any) are defective. The redundant nozzle belonging to the same line as that of a malfunctioning nozzle can be programmed to eject the ink that had been designated for the malfunctioning nozzle. Consequently, high print quality can be maintained despite a nozzle failure.
In another embodiment, a printhead can be physically rotated such that it traverses across the print medium at a selected angle.
It should be noted that the present invention is applicable to stationary inkjet printers as well as scanning inkjet printers. In a scanning inkjet printer, one or more printheads containing a tilted nozzle array is horizontally scanned across the print medium to deposit a line of ink. In a stationary inkjet printer an entire line of ink is deposited by implementing multiple printheads, at least one of which contains a tilted nozzle array. It should also be noted that any of the cartridges can be black and/ or color ink.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the multiple columns of nozzles in a print head are used to achieve high print speed instead of high resolution.
In one embodiment, the slanting is re-arranged by tilting the printhead at a different angle, so that the odd nozzles are in line with the even nozzles horizontally. One example is that nozzle 2 is aligned with the nozzle 5 horizontally, as shown in FIG. 6. The slant angle is arctan(6/96)=3.576 degree. Such an alignment results in an effective vertical nozzle spacing of 300 dpi rather than 600 dpi. The full black out print pattern for 300 by 300 dpi printing is shown in FIG. 9. Each column of nozzles only prints every other vertical line. Hence, for a printhead with the same given maximum firing frequency, printing can occur at 80 ips. Printing at or less than the maximum firing frequency ensures that there will be enough time between the adjacent nozzles to satisfy minimum fire pulse width and minimum time interval requirements. Reference is now made to U.S. Pat. No. 5,635,968, entitled “Thermal Inkjet Printer Printhead With Offset Heater Resistors,” which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herewith. With 3.576 degree slanting, the horizontal distance between two nozzles is {fraction (1/300)}*sin(3.576)=2.08 e−4 inch. At 80 ips, the time between two nozzles in a primitive firing for a full black out image is 2.08 e−4/80=2.6 microsecond. It is sufficient for minimum fire pulse width and time interval requirements. Since only one nozzle can be fired at a time in one primitive, the last nozzle must finish firing before the first nozzle reaches the next print column. In other words, the horizontal distance of each primitive should be less than the horizontal resolution of the image. With 300 by 300 dpi and 3.576 degree slanting, this requirement is satisfied.
If nozzle 2 and nozzle 7 are aligned horizontally, the slanting angle is 4.764 degrees, it can print at 300 vertical by 200 horizontal dpi at 120 ips. The full black out image pattern is shown in FIG. 10. The time between two nozzles firing in a primitive for a full black out image is 2.31 microseconds. If nozzle 2 and nozzle 9 are aligned horizontally, the slanting angle is 5.947 degrees. It can print at 300 vertical by 150 horizontal dpi at 160 ips. The full black out image pattern is shown in FIG. 11. The time between two nozzles firing for a full black out image is 2.16 microseconds. If it slants more, such that nozzle 2 and nozzle 11 are aligned horizontally, the angle is 7.125 degrees. With the same print speed as 160 ips, and 300 vertical by 150 horizontal dpi resolution, the time between two nozzles firing for a full black out image is 2.58 microseconds. This grants more time margin for fire pulses. It should be noted that for all the above cases, without changing the angle of printhead rotation, if the print speed is lowered to half of its maximum, printing can occur at twice the horizontal resolution specified above. Furthermore, various embodiments can be expanded into print heads with three or more columns of nozzles. Consequently, embodiments of the present invention fully utilize the multiple columns on a print head to achieve high speed printing. The vertical resolution can be reduced, without padding zeros in the print data. In addition, more horizontal distance between adjacent nozzles can be achieved for higher speed or more time margin.
Therefore, the embodiments of the present invention, an inkjet printer having a print head with a nozzle array which is tilted relative to the print medium, has been described. While the present invention has been described in particular embodiments, it should be appreciated that the present invention should not be construed as limited by such embodiments, but rather construed according to the below claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of the now abandoned, U.S. application Ser. No. 10/222,653, by Serra, filed Aug. 15, 2002, titled “A Tilted Nozzle Array For Achieving Nozzle Redundancy In A Printer”, which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5606350 | Koyama | Feb 1997 | A |
6189991 | Wen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6341840 | van Doorn et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6533385 | Mackay et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0891869 | Jan 1999 | EP |
1033251 | Sep 2000 | EP |
2134045 | Aug 1984 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040032447 A1 | Feb 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10222653 | Aug 2002 | US |
Child | 10460276 | US |