This application is a national phase filing, under 35 U.S.C. §371(c), of International Application No. PCT/DK2006/000603, filed Oct. 31, 2006, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Not Applicable
The present invention relates to a probe for testing electrical properties of test samples.
When performing resistance measurements for determining electrical properties of a test sample, a test probe comprising one or more arms each carrying a tip for establishing electrical contact to the test surface is brought into contact with the test surface.
The present invention provides a cantilever (beam) geometry that enables a non-penetrating static contact to be formed between a cantilever tip and a test sample surface. Further, the present invention provides a multi-cantilever probe with one or more cantilevers defined by the cantilever (beam) geometry. Still further the present invention provides a methodology for designing nanoelectromechanical systems (NEMS) and microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) for which a low wear static contact is desired to improve stability and lifetime of a mechanical contact or an electromechanical contact.
Microscopic four point probes are used as metrology tool for electrical characterisation of conductive and semi-conductive thin films and multi-layered structures. As illustrated in
Related systems and methods may be found in publications such as US 2004/072452, US 2003/102878, WO 2005/031376, U.S. Pat. No. 6,672,875, US 2001/012739, U.S. Pat. No. 4,383,217, EP 1 085 327, US 2004/183554, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,943,571, 4,703,252, 5,691,648, 6,747,445, US 2005/0151552, US 2005/0081609 and US 2005/0062448. Reference is made to all of the above-mentioned US patent publications, all of which are hereby incorporated in the present specification by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
A first aspect of the present invention relates to a test probe formed so as to, at least partly, reduce the wear of the test probe during performing tests. The test probe comprises:
a body having a probe arm defining a proximal end and an opposite distal end, the probe arm extending from the body at the proximal end of the probe arm, a first axis being defined by the proximal end and the distal end,
the probe arm defining a geometry allowing flexible movement of the probe arm along the first axis and along a second axis perpendicular to the first axis and along a third axis orthogonal to a plane defined by the first axis and second axis.
The geometry defined by the probe arm provides the probe arm with flexible motion so that when the probe is in contact with a test sample, and the test probe is held in a holder of a test apparatus, vibrations from the surroundings are at least to a certain degree absorbed in the arm and not transferred to motion between the probe arm and test sample. This static contact between the test probe and the test sample may be achieved by ensuring that the frictional force is higher that the absolute force applied in the surface plane of the test sample.
The probe arm extends freely from the body. The probe arms have free, flexible motion.
The body defines a first planar surface. The arm extends from the body. The arm defines a plane being parallel to the first planar surface of the body. The first planar surface and the plane defined by the arm are parallel when the arm is not in contact with a surface of a test sample. The arm may define an L-shaped geometry or any other geometry giving flexibility to the arm so that a static contact may be achieved.
In one embodiment, the arm may be formed by depositing material on the body. E.g. by starting out with a larger structure whereon the arm is formed by deposition, then part of the material supporting the arm in this stage is removed so that the arm may freely extend from the body. The body is then the remaining part of the larger structure.
When the probe is held in static contact with the test sample rather than the test probe moving relative to the test sample, significant increase in the lifetime of the test probe is achieved. Also, it is contemplated that the quality of tests performed is increased as the conditions under which the test is performed are not changed and the contact area of the test sample remains substantially the same.
When the probe is held in static contact with a surface part of the test sample, a common approximation of the friction force, Ff, is given by the product of the static friction coefficient, μs, and the normal force, N.
FfμsN
Ideally the lateral force, FL, should be zero, but this is virtually impossible. Thus, in order to obtain a static contact, the friction force must be higher than the lateral force acting in the surface plane.
Ff>FL
The lateral force, FL, acting on the cantilever tip is for small movements assumed to be proportional to the normal force.
In an advantageous embodiment of the present invention, the probe arm may be a supporting structure supporting a contact probe for establishing electrical contact to the test sample, a pad for establishing electrical contact to a test apparatus and an electrical conductive strip positioned on or in the body for establishing electrical contact between the contact probe and the pad.
The above mentioned arrangement is provided for the probe to send and receive electrical signals transmitted to and through the test sample, respectively. The electrical signals may be AC, DC, RF, or any other electrical signal or combinations of signals. Also, the test apparatus may include signal filters, lock-in circuits etc.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the geometry may include a semi-circular part and/or a square part and/or a rectangular part and/or triangular part and/or any combinations thereof. The different geometries, or parts thereof, help allowing flexible movement of the probe arm when the probe is subjected to vibrations and/or drift etc.
In a specific embodiment, the geometry may include two substantially linear parts connected so as to define an angle. Further, the probe arm itself may extend from the body in an angle. The angle or angles may be between 0 and 180 degrees, such as between 55 and 145, e.g. 90 degrees.
The angles and geometries mentioned above apply to any or all of the three dimensions.
Advantageously, the probe arm defines substantially equal spring constants in the direction of the first, the second and the third axis. It is found to be very advantageous for the probe arm to have spring constants that are equal or substantially equal in the three dimensions.
In a further embodiment, the body may include a plurality of probe arms. The plurality of probe arms allows for multi-point probe measurements, e.g. four-point probe measurements.
In an even further embodiment of the present invention, the plurality of probe arms may define similar geometries or in the alternative at least two different geometries. In some applications it could be contemplated to have probe arms defining substantially identical or similar geometries, e.g. for having a plurality of probe arms located closely together while defining a line at the probe tips.
In a still further embodiment a probe having probe arms defining different geometries in order to have a plurality of probe arms for positioning a multitude of probe tips closely together without defining a line may be used. Other applications may be envisioned.
In an even still further embodiment of the present invention the probe, when in use, may define spring constants that, when projected onto a plane of a surface of the test sample are substantially equal, or define a ratio between 1:1 to 1:20. When the test probe has been brought into contact with the surface of the test sample an angle is defined between the test probe and the test sample surface. The angle may be between 0 and 180 degrees. usually around 30 degrees. The probe arms have or define spring constants as described elsewhere, wherein when these spring constants are projected onto a plane defined by the surface of the test sample, the projected spring constants are preferably substantially equal. However it has been found that the spring constants may also have a ratio between 1:1 to 1:20. such a 1:2 to 1:15, such as 1:3 to 1:10, such as 1:4 to 1:6, such as 1:1 to 1:2. such as 1:2 to 1:3. such as 1:3 to 1:4, such as 1:4 to 1:5, such as 1:5 to 1:8, such as 1:8 to 1:10. such as 1:10 to 1:15, such as 1:15 to 1:20.
A second aspect of the present invention relates to a probe for testing electrical properties of a test sample. the probe may comprise:
a body defining a first planar surface,
a probe arm defining first part having a proximal end an opposite distal end. the probe arm extending from the body at the proximal end of the first part. a first axis defined by the proximal and the distal end of the first part, the probe arm extending parallel with the first planar surface,
the probe arm defining a geometry allowing flexible movement of the probe arm along the first axis and along a second axis perpendicular to the first axis and along a third axis orthogonal to a plane defined by the first axis and second axis.
When the probe is brought into contact with a surface of a test sample, the arm does not penetrate the surface of the test sample.
The probe is used for obtaining characteristic electrical properties of a test sample. Such characteristic electrical properties may include resistance and conductivity properties.
It is contemplated to be advantageous that the arm may be positioned in co-planar relationship with the first planar surface. Co-planar relationship means that a plane of the arm and a plane of the body are in the same geometric plane. E.g. the arm may be positioned on the first surface, i.e. the body supports the arm at the first surface of the body.
Further, the body may define a second planar surface being substantially orthogonal to the first planar surface, the probe arm extending from the second planar surface.
In a particular advantageous embodiment of the present invention, the arm may define an L-shaped geometry.
The probe according to the first aspect and the probe according to the second aspect are, when in use, placed in an apparatus including a holding device for holding the probe. Further signal generating and signal detecting equipment may be included in the apparatus, or at least connected to the apparatus for transmitting and receiving/detecting signals to/from the test sample via the probe.
A third aspect of the present invention relates to a test probe for testing electrical properties of test samples. The test probe according to the fifth aspect may comprise:
The test probe may be suspended e.g. by springs or other structural elements allowing the probe to be suspended in a flexible manner so that static contact may be established between the test probe and the test sample surface.
Further, the test probe according to the first aspect of the present invention may include any of the features mentioned in relation to the second and/or third aspect.
The present invention is now to be described with reference to the attached schematic illustrations, in which:
In order to increase the lifetime of a probe, the tip wear must be minimised. The wear originates from at least two sources and their individual contributions are unknown. As a straight cantilever is brought into contact with a surface, the tip scrapes along the surface in the longitudinal direction of the cantilever. During measuring, the contact point is believed to be dynamic, i.e. the tip rubs against the surface due to vibrations and drift.
A reference co-ordinate system is illustrated in
In order to reduce this wear a probe according to the present invention is provided in order to create a static contact, both during engaging and during measuring. The cantilevers are given a third dimension of freedom such that each cantilever has a balanced spring constant of (kx, ky, kz)˜(k, k, k). Unlike conventional micro-four-point probes, vibrations/movements may be absorbed in all directions.
In order to obtain a static contact, the friction force must be higher than the absolute force applied in the surface plane.
Ff>|Fx| (I)
The friction force is given by the product of the static friction coefficient and the normal force.
Ff=μs·N=−μs·Fs (II)
The forces acting as a result of an engage depth, d, is given by:
Fz=Fx′·{circumflex over (z)}+Fz′·{circumflex over (z)}=−d·(kx′·sin2 θ+kz′·cos2 θ) (III)
Fx=Fx′·{circumflex over (x)}−Fz′·{circumflex over (x)}=−d·(kx′−kz′)·sin θ·cos θ (IV)
(I), (II), (III) and (IV) reduces to the inequality:
It is obvious that the inequality is satisfied for A→1. This means that the cantilever spring constants should be equal in absolute value. This can be achieved by a number of different approaches. The formulation can be expanded for 3 dimensions.
When using probes having the above mentioned and above described geometries the contact between the probe and the test sample remains static and the probe lifetime increases significantly. The same effect may be achieved by similar geometries.
In still further embodiments of the present invention, a probe may be suspended by use of springs, or the like, in order to achieve the same effect as described above in relation to other embodiments of the present invention.
A common approximation of the friction force, Ff, is given by the product of the static friction coefficient, μs, and the normal force, N.
Ff=μsN (I)
Ideally the lateral force, FL, should be zero, but this is virtually impossible. Thus, in order to obtain a static contact, the friction force must be higher than the lateral force acting in the surface plane.
Ff>FL (II)
The lateral force, FL, acting on the cantilever tip is for small movements assumed to be proportional to the normal force.
One embodiment of the present cantilever design is a high aspect ratio L-shaped cantilever as illustrated in
The cantilever in
The cantilever includes a first part having a first length L1, and a second part having a second length L2. The first part further has a first width w1 and the second part has a second width w2. The first and second parts have substantially equal heights h.
In the cantilever reference frame the tip deflection
Applying a force in the {circumflex over (x)}′ direction will result in a deflection in the {circumflex over (x)}′ and {circumflex over (x)}′ direction. And applying a force in the ŷ′ direction will result in a deflection in the ŷ′ and {circumflex over (x)}′ direction. This gives rise to the cross-terms Cxy and Cyx which can be shown to be equal. Applying a force in the {circumflex over (z)}′ direction will only result in a deflection in the {circumflex over (z)}′ direction.
The spring constant of the cantilever tip,
The spring constant of the cantilever tip in the surface reference frame is found through rotation.
The rotation matrix is found according to
In
The present invention may be characterised by the following points:
a body having a probe arm defining a proximal and an opposite distal end, said probe arm extending from said body at said proximal end of said probe arm, a first axis being defined by said proximal and said distal end,
said probe arm defining a geometry allowing flexible movement of said probe arm along said first axis and along a second axis perpendicular to said first axis and along a third axis orthogonal to a plane defined by said first axis and second axis.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
05388093 | Oct 2005 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DK2006/000603 | 10/31/2006 | WO | 00 | 8/12/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/051471 | 5/10/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3702439 | McGahey et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
4383217 | Shiell | May 1983 | A |
4703252 | Perloff et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
5691648 | Cheng | Nov 1997 | A |
6255585 | Jones et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6507204 | Kanamaru et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6636063 | Arnold et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6672875 | Mathieu et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6747445 | Fetterman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6747465 | Esashi et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6771084 | Di Stefano | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788080 | Lenz | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6828804 | Yashiro et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6922069 | Jun | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6943571 | Worledge | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7091729 | Kister | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7377788 | Hasegawa | May 2008 | B2 |
7504822 | Parrish et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7557593 | Hirakawa et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7659739 | Kister | Feb 2010 | B2 |
20010012739 | Grube et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020153911 | Cho et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030102878 | Montoya | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030151419 | Felici et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040036490 | Schaeffer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040072452 | Eldridge et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050062448 | Oh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050081609 | Worledge | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050110507 | Koizumi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050151552 | Abraham et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20080106280 | Chen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080197866 | Jo | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 085 327 | Mar 2001 | EP |
55133550 | Oct 1980 | JP |
6249880 | Sep 1994 | JP |
2005291725 | Oct 2005 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090219047 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |