This invention relates to capturing carbon dioxide and making beneficial use of the captured gas. This invention more specifically relates to capturing carbon dioxide and distributing and applying the gas to carbon dioxide absorbing plants for bio-sequestration of the gas or for consumption through photosynthesis. The application of carbon dioxide to the plants promotes growth in the plant, such that the plant has more robust root and shoot systems. In addition, application of the gas to cultivated plants increases crop yield per harvest, improves the size and quantity of fruit, and/or improves the productivity by allowing earlier harvests or multiple harvests.
While carbon dioxide provides a benefit to plants, it is a major contributor to global warming. Global warming is a result of increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases (“GHG”) in the atmosphere. Among the primary greenhouse gases are water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, perfluorocarbons, hydrofluorcarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. Of these, carbon dioxide is the primary anthropogenic (i.e, manmade) GHG, accounting for a substantial portion of the human contribution to the greenhouse effect in recent years. The combustion of fossil fuels is a major source of anthropogenic carbon dioxide, where the combustion may occur in mobile and stationary devices. In, 2006, reports from NASA and the US Department of Energy report that 9 gigatons of GHG is annually added to the atmosphere worldwide by manmade processes, such as fossil fuel combustion and/or flue gas sources. It is estimated that the minimum amount of CO2 required to be removed from the atmosphere to stop the advance of climate change is 4 gigatons per year.
A flue gas is a gas which exits a flue gas generator to the atmosphere via a flue (i.e., a pipe or conduit) which conveys exhaust gases from the flue gas generator. The stream of flue gas normally contains elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide. Because flue gas contains a significant percentage of carbon dioxide—e.g., 5% or 50,000 parts-per-million—relative to only a few hundred parts-per-million carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, flue gas provides a substantial contribution to the atmospheric GHG. Thus, per the United States Environmental Protection Agency and state statutory schemes (e.g., California SB 32), the management of carbon dioxide merits a review of flue gas sources and consideration of systems and methods for capturing carbon dioxide from the flue gas.
Examples of flue gas generators are industrial steam generators, power plants, syngas plants, residential water heaters, and heater furnaces. Flue gas is defined as the combustion products of a hydrocarbon fuel and air and/or a water shift reaction product from a syngas plant. The hydrocarbon fuel can be natural gas, propane, gasoline, and other fuels. Dry air is composed of approximately 79 percent nitrogen, approximately 21 percent oxygen, water content which in humid air is usually under 10 percent and other trace components in the parts per million, including carbon dioxide at between 300 to 400 ppm. The direct combustion products resulting in flue gas contain elevated levels of carbon dioxide (usually under 10 percent) and water (usually under 30 percent). Also contained in the gas is relatively inert nitrogen which passes through the flue gas generator along with any excess uncombusted oxygen. These combustion products are produced at an elevated temperature usually in a firing chamber at hundreds of degrees Fahrenheit, and low pressures, usually near atmospheric.
Thus, flue gases have high temperature, low pressure, and relatively high carbon dioxide concentration with respect to the normal concentration in air. Because the sources of flue gas are ubiquitous, capturing even a modest portion of the carbon dioxide from flue gas yields meaningful results in decreasing carbon dioxide releases to the atmosphere. However many of the known systems for separation, concentration and capture of carbon dioxide from flue gas, such as absorption, adsorption, cryogenic distillation, and membrane separation, can be complicated and energy intensive, making the proposed systems positive greenhouse gas contributors. These systems can also be very expensive, at typical costs ranging from $200 to $300 per ton of removed CO2. Thus, the approximate expense of utilizing these systems for removing the 4 gigatons CO2 required to stop the advance of global warming, as discussed above, would be about $1 trillion dollars/year, which is on the order of the annual budget for the United States government—in other words, achieving the required CO2 removal by utilizing the known systems for artificial sequestration alone is not an economically feasible solution to the GHG problem.
In contrast to the artificial carbon dioxide sinks are the natural sequestration systems, which include the oceans, soils, forests, plants and micro-organisms. The biomass (roots, leaves, branches, etc.) of trees and plants are estimated by the US DOE in 2008 to currently hold approximately 550 gigatons CO2 worldwide, with photosynthesis in such biomass removing approximately 60 gigatons carbon dioxide per year, as follows: (1) forests removing approximately 10 gigatons; (2) permanent crops (orchards, vineyards) 3 gigatons; (3) annual (row) crops removing 11 gigatons; and (4) pasture land removing 36 gigatons. Increasing the amount of carbon dioxide naturally sequestered in plant biomass would be very desirable, particularly because of the positive impact carbon dioxide has on plant growth and productivity.
A system which efficiently, effectively and inexpensively captures and sequesters carbon dioxide without additional GHG contribution is desirable. A system which accomplishes these goals while also making beneficial use of the captured carbon dioxide is particularly desirable.
Embodiments of the method and apparatus disclosed herein provide a solution to the problems described above. The present invention provides CO2 to plants in concentrations and temperatures which are beneficial to the plants. In providing CO2 to plants, the present invention captures CO2 from a stationary flue gas generator from the atmosphere. Once captured, the CO2 may, as necessary, be cooled, diluted, dewatered, and/or concentrated and then distributed to the plants. In all embodiments, a membrane system is utilized to separate the CO2 from other components and, if desired, to concentrate the CO2. The collected CO2 is processed through the system to achieve optimal temperature, pressure, flowrate, CO2 concentration, nutrient levels and/or water content. Application of CO2 may be supplemented by providing additional components directly to the plants which maintain a level of fertilization and irrigation suitable for the increased biomass (including yield of crop) and water utilization efficiency resulting from the increased intake of carbon dioxide by the plants.
An embodiment of the invention has a gas distribution network connected to the main duct. The gas distribution network receives a gas mixture from the venting stack. Because of the low anticipated pressures, the gas distribution network may be configured from thin-walled ducting material. The gas distribution network may have one or more membrane modules which receive a low pressure gas mixture, where the membrane modules are utilized to enrich the CO2 concentration and to separate out a nitrogen rich component from the flue gas. The membranes may be of the spiral wound, hollow fiber, of flat sheet type. Alternatively, a leaf membrane structure disposed directly within a portion of the distribution duct may be used as a substitute for a membrane module. As the leaf membrane configuration may be configured with multiple membranes sequentially staged in which the carbon dioxide concentration increases at each stage. The various leaf membrane configurations are hereinafter collectively to an “inline leaf membrane” regardless of the number of stages.
The known membranes are sensitive to high temperature. Because flue gas discharged from a typical flue gas source may have a temperature exceeding 300 degrees Fahrenheit, cooling of the gas is required prior to contact with any membrane system. In some cases, lengthy runs and/or dilution with ambient air may be sufficient to cool the gas long to allow sufficient cooling of the gas, say to approximately 100 degrees Fahrenheit, to prevent damage to the membrane system. However, for close coupled systems, where the flue gas source is close to the crops to be treated, some type of cooling system is desirable. In such cases, an alternative embodiment of the invention utilizes quenching towers to lower the temperature of the flue gas.
The gas distribution manifold comprises at least one manometric trap for water condensate drainage from the gas mixture. Embodiments of the invention have a distribution array which is disposed amongst photosynthetic organisms, such as in an agricultural field utilized for growing plants. The distribution array may comprise a blower, a valve and plurality of gas emitters through which the gas mixture may be selectively discharged amidst the plants upon activation of the valve. It is to be appreciated that as a gas stream flows through the components of the system, including flow through coolers, membrane modules or inline leaf membrane, the gas stream cools to a temperature which is sufficiently low to be to be safely processed through the systems components and to be administered to the photosynthetic organisms. As the gas stream cools, condensation occurs and the moisture content decreases, and liquid water condensate is collected and drained from the system.
The gas mixture may be discharged through a network of perforated tubing or open end ducting set amongst plants in a field thus providing a warm moist carbon-dioxide enriched micro-environment around the plants. Through photosynthesis the plants convert water and carbon-dioxide in the biosphere (air surrounding the plants) to cellulosic plant building blocks and oxygen, while carbon dioxide is also organically sequestered in the plant biomass, resulting in larger root and shoot systems. Thus, embodiments of the disclosed system utilize the captured carbon dioxide, as well as the elevated (with respect to ambient conditions) of humidity and temperature, for a beneficial purpose.
Embodiments of the system and process may further utilize carbon dioxide containment mechanisms such as sheeting and draping to provide a barrier which contains the carbon dioxide enriched air adjacent to the plants.
Embodiments of the present invention may be applied for carbon dioxide capture from any flue gas source. As one example,
With respect to the embodiment of the invention which provides for multiple extraction points from flue gas source 100, lower extraction point 110 depicts extraction at an existing nozzle or branch or sample tap off below the existing stack tip 106. Middle extraction point 112 is located in a portion of venting stack 102 where the venting stack is at full diameter. Upper extraction point 114 is located at a “partial pipe” 116 or a sliced pipe of partial stack diameter, or a fully round pipe of partial diameter within venting stack 102. Middle extraction point 112 and upper extraction point 114 are above the existing flue gas stack tip 106, but below top 108 of the venting stack 102. Middle extraction point 112 and upper extraction point 114 may be uncapped or capped via a hinged closure device, attached onto the new stack tip.
The gas stream taken through lower extraction point 110, because of the location for its extraction, will be solely flue gas having a high flowing temperature. However, gas streams taken from middle extraction point 112 and upper extraction point 114 will be diluted because the locations of the extraction points will allow dilution of the extracted flue gas from top 108 of the venting stack 102. The gas stream taken through upper extraction point 114 will be subjected to maximum dilution and cooling because the volume of ambient air drawn into the gas stream may range from a fraction of the volume of the extracted flue gas up to multiple volumes more of the flue gas volume.
Partial pipe 116 may be configured, either manually or automatically, to open and close. In addition, the orientation of the open portion may be repositioned manually or automatically. This ability to adjust the magnitude and orientation of the opening of the partial pipe section allows for adjusting the opening, thereby having some control of the volume of dilution air utilized for adjusting the CO2 concentration and temperature of the gas stream leaving flue gas source 100, and making adjustments base upon wind speed and direction. In some embodiments, the orientation of the partial pipe section may be repositioned based on wind speed/direction.
Each line attached to extraction points 104, 110, 112, 114 may have a valve 118 for isolation or proportionating of the gas streams taken from each extraction point. These valves are low pressure drop light weight butterfly and/or wafer valves suitable for the operating and design conditions of the process. They can be manually operated with devices from grade or at platforms nearby the valves, or automatically controlled by pressure, concentration, temperature, flow, or other process condition monitoring devices.
The ducting 120 shown in
Discharge from flue gas source 100 is directed to flue gas receiving station 200. It is to be appreciated that a cooling means is desirable which reduces the temperature of the gas stream in ducting 120 before the gas stream reaches the first blower 210 and membrane module 212 (or inline leaf membrane) depicted in
Alternatively, particularly in situations where the flue gas source 100 is closely coupled to the plants to be treated with CO2 (with the flue gas receiving station 200 even closer) various cooling mechanisms may be utilized, such as conventional heat exchangers, including shell and tube heat exchangers, finned fan coolers, and other varieties of heat exchanger utilized for gas processing and transportation.
Alternatively, a system such as that depicted in
Upper conduit 120′ delivers hot extracted gas having a temperature of approximately 300 degrees Fahrenheit to a first quench column 230′ and to a second quench column 240′, each column utilizing direct contact with cooled quench water to cool hot stack gas fed into the quench column. The number of stages in first quench column 230′ and second quench column 240′ may be varied according to the cooling requirements. As depicted in
By way of example, hot flue gas may enter first quench column 230′ at a temperature of approximately 300 degrees Fahrenheit and may be cooled to a temperature range of 80 to 110 degrees by first quench column 230′. Cooled flue gas exits first quench column 230′ through outlet 232′ and into condensate knock-out drum 234′. Blower 210′ may be utilized to boost the pressure of the flue exiting first quench column 230′ for inputting into second quench column 240′. Upon discharge from second quench column 240′, cooled gas at a temperature of approximately 110 degree Fahrenheit is directed into conventional membrane module 212′. An inline leaf membrane module 812, as depicted in
A “residue” gas stream having a reduced concentration of CO2 (e.g., a stream having 2% CO2) may exit membrane module 212′ through outlet 252′ at a pressure of approximately 1 psia. This gas stream may be directed to distribution array 300 for local crop enrichment. A liquid ring (vacuum) compressor 260′ may apply vacuum to the “permeate” gas stream 254′ of membrane module 212′ and recover a gas stream having a higher concentrated level of CO2 (e.g., a stream having 43% CO2, higher concentration than the “Residue” Stream). This stream of concentrated CO2 may be directed to knockout drum 262′ and then transported via smaller diameter ducting 264′ over longer distances for crop enrichment.
The ducting 202 can be manifolded or branched round robin style into a system 400 comprising multiple smaller sized diameter ducting as shown in
The bank may include a duct spacer sheet 500 (i.e., a perforated plate) which holds the ducting at a prescribed distance and at a prescribed orientation as detailed in
Alternatively, ducting 202 may comprise large bore light weight ducting, which could be hung off of poles, and which may be under a hundred feet to several miles in length. Alternatively, ducting 202 may be transversely finned to increase external surface area and thus enhance cooling of the internal gas with improved heat transfer to the ambient air. These laterals have simple manometric traps 204 located at appropriate spacing and at all low points to facilitate water condensate drainage. The manometric traps 204 are common “P-Trap” devices with snake shaped piping to facilitate collection of a trapped liquid condensate water liquid to facilitate containment of the flue gas with a manometric leg of water. This trapped manometric leg of liquid water will need to be monitored and may need to be replenished over periods of time to prevent excessive leakage of flue gas. The traps may also be monitored with local or automated level indication and control using automated valves at the exit tip of the trap to indicate and assure that a level is maintained within the trap.
In
In
The flue gas typically comprises 100,000+ ppm (10+%) CO2. When diluted with ambient air having a CO2 concentration of 400 ppm, the resulting CO2 reaching the crops or orchard will reach an approximate sweet spot concentration of about 1000 ppm. This concentration may be maintained by bounds the edges (not the top) of any portion of the crop or orchard with a thin (most likely plastic film) barrier to minimize the impact of wind and contain the enriched gas within the area of the crop or orchard. If desired, this “crop gas” or “orchard gas” can be funneled into ducting attached to points in this barrier which sends the gas to blowers that sweep the orchard gas back into the same quench/membrane/liquid ring compressor system, which then re-concentrates and recycles the gas back to the crop or orchard at a CO2 concentration of approximately 3000 ppm, thus minimizing the amount of imported flue gas to the orchard.
In
In
In contrast to conventional membrane modules, which are packaged units, the leaf membrane units 712 and 812 simply need to be supported and, if inside ducting, requires a penetration in the ducting to allow extraction of the permeate. Embodiments of the leaf membranes units 712, 812 can be free standing in atmosphere, placed in a plume of a stack, placed for direct air capture in simply an open field, as suitable for the embodiment depicted in
For leaf membranes contained in ducts, there is an additional benefit in that the selectivities of the membrane improve by allowing pressure to be raised above ambient, while providing the direct benefit of not needing a module, and other devices, such as a condenser, and not being space or size limited. Selectivities are a function of the concentration of both the permeate and residue.
While the above is a description of various embodiments of the present invention, further modifications may be employed without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus the scope of the invention should not be limited according to these factors, but according to the following appended claims.
This application claims domestic priority to U.S. provisional application 62/651,039 filed Mar. 30, 2018
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4073089 | Maginnes et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
5034126 | Reddy | Jul 1991 | A |
5071451 | Wijmans | Dec 1991 | A |
5682709 | Erickson | Nov 1997 | A |
6108967 | Erickson | Aug 2000 | A |
6237284 | Erickson | May 2001 | B1 |
6745580 | Brown | Jun 2004 | B1 |
7842264 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8197857 | Dressler et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8252091 | Anand et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8595020 | Marino | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8617292 | Hasse | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8852319 | Wijmans et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8889400 | Martin et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8999038 | Ungerank | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9266057 | Jones | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9359750 | Perez | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9433887 | Wijmans et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9433896 | Eisenberger | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9514493 | Marino | Dec 2016 | B2 |
20040211726 | Baig | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20100205960 | McBride et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100210745 | McDaniel | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110005272 | Wijmans | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110195473 | Wilhelm | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120009109 | Wright | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120171053 | Wang | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130058853 | Baker | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140286797 | Tamm | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150292807 | Romeo | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20170271701 | Berlowitz | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170341942 | Harper, Jr. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20200056578 | Sheldon-Coulson | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200141410 | Kawasaki | May 2020 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
C. Maidana et al., Reduction of Fuel Consumption and Emissions of a Gas Turbine by Using of Oxygen-Enriched Combustion, 2nd Oxyfuel Combustion Conference. |
B.A. Kimball et al. Effects of Increasing Atmospheric CO2 on Vegetation printed in CO2 and Biosphere by J. Rozema et al. at p. 65, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993. |
L Brinkman, Theoretical and Experimental Investigations of Flat Sheet Membrane Module Types for High Capacity Gas Separation Applications, Chemie Ingenie Technik, vol. 85, Issue 8, pp. 1210-1220, May 17, 2013. |
B. A. Kimball et al, Seventeen Years of Carbon Dioxide Enrichment of Sour Orange Trees: Final Results, Global Change Biology (2007) 13, 2171-2183. |
T.C. Merkel et al, Power Plant Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture: An Opportunity for Membranes, Journal of Membrane Science 359 (2010) 126-139. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62651039 | Mar 2018 | US |