Process for digital communication and system communicating digitally

Abstract

According to the present invention, a three-line bus is used for communication between a first digital unit (1) and two other digital units (3). The three-line bus includes a system clock line (SCL) as well as a data transmission line (SD) through which data is sent from the two other units (3), i.e. transmitting units, to the first unit (1), i.e. receiving unit. The system uses an authorization line (WS) for determining which of the two transmitting units (3) is capable of writing data on the data transmission line (SD) and when it can do so. The communication form the first unit (1), now operating as a transmitter, to the two other units (3), now operating as receivers, is made possible by the fact that data signals are also injected in the authorization line (WS) and transmitted through said line together with the authorization control signals.

Description

[0001] This invention concerns a process for digital communication according to the wording in the preamble to claim 1 and claim 2, and a system communicating digitally according to claims 18 and 19.

[0002] This invention proceeds from problems as they arise in hearing air technology. On the other hand, its proposals for solving them can be generalized, in the sense that they can basically be used for digital communication between units.

[0003] Hearing aid technology is increasingly moving toward processing signals digitally, especially audio signals, for which a so-called “digital signal processing” unit or DSP is used. Depending on the hearing aid configuration, these DSP are connected to many different, varied and potentially identical peripheral units, thus, for example, one or more acoustic/electric converters, T-coils and controllers, such as potentiometers for adjusting amplification, interface units, etc. In the most general cases, such units are analog units in themselves. But so they can be connected flexibly to the DSP, A/D converters are integrated into such analogous peripheral units, as they are used on hearing aids, so that the following will assume that the peripheral units each have outputs for serial digital data. Please refer also to application PCT/CH98/00502 by the same applicant on this, which is enclosed with this application as APPENDIX A and which describes developments in the field of digital hearing aid configuration today. This APPENDIX A should be an integral part of the application in this sense.

[0004] It proposes, inter alia, establishing communication between peripheral units and a central digital processing unit, the DSP, by a three-wire connection system, like for example an I2S bus and corresponding interface units, like the ones sold by Philips.

[0005] Such a bus configuration has proven extremely worthwhile, inter alia, because of its simplicity, in terms of the hardware and software to be installed, and its energy consumption for hearing aid applications.

[0006] This invention is thus based on such a three-wire bus configuration, in which serial digital data SD are transmitted on a data line SD, permission signals WS on a second line and clock signals SCL on a third line. A system working with such a three-line bus, as it is used in the above-mentioned application especially for hearing aids, will be explained using FIG. 1 as the basis for understanding the invention on which this application is based.

[0007] Between a digital signal-processing unit DSP and two peripheral units 3, there is, apart from electrical feed lines, a three-wire bus connection 5. On the one line SCL, the system clock signal is placed, which is usually generated in the DSP (not shown). On a second line SD, the data-transmission line, or data line for short, serial digital data from both peripheral units 3 are written and transmitted to the DSP, for which the first units have data outputs ASD to output such data, and the DSP has a data input ESD.

[0008] Usually, a permission signal is placed on the third line WS, the so-called “word-select line” by the DSP, and its respective binary state determines when which of the two peripheral units 3 can write data for the DSP on the common data line SD.

[0009] Particularly on hearing aids with a bus system, according to FIG. 1, there is a need, while keeping the advantages of the three-wire bus system, to create two-way data communication between the DSP and the peripheral units 3, not just one-way communication from the peripheral units 3 to the DSP, as in FIG. 1.

[0010] There is another problem with the system in FIG. 1. Namely, if the hardware is configured, the DSP does not know how many peripheral units—one or two—are connected, and the one peripheral unit considered 3 “knows” just as little about whether it is connected to the bus alone, or whether a second such unit is connected to the same bus 5: without contact, there is a conflict over writing data to the SD; each unit provided considers itself entitled to write data, for example in the ‘1’ state of the WS line.

[0011] Thus, this invention starts from a process for digital communication between:

[0012] a first unit—the DSP—which has one input ESD for serial digital data,

[0013] at least two second units—3—each of which can be connected to a data output for serial, digital data,

[0014] whereby the input ESD of the first unit DSP is connected via a common data line SD to the outputs ASD of the two units connected and, in this process, serial digital data are supplied from the second unit to the first over the data line SD mentioned, controlled by a binary permission signal supplied to the second units 3 together via a permission line WS, and a clock signal supplied to all units connected via a clock line SCL.

[0015] Starting from such a process or such a digitally communicating system, this application sets itself the following task:

[0016] to make data communication also possible between the first unit—DSP—and the peripheral unit or units—3—connected to it;

[0017] in an initialization phase, to identify the prevailing system constellation in order to intervene, control and prevent conflicts on the SD line, depending on the results.

[0018] It should be emphasized that although the procedure in the invention is based on the fact that two peripheral units can be connected to a DSP unit via the three-wire bus system mentioned, the invention can be expanded by connecting more than two peripheral units to the one DSP, as can be seen from the following description.

[0019] The process solves the problem mentioned by having the first unit communicate with the second and by having data signals superimposed on the binary permission signal on the first unit, and received and evaluated on the second units connected.

[0020] For this, it proposes the system that communicates digitally in claim 18.

[0021] The second problem mentioned is solved by the fact that—in an initialization phase—independent, serial digital random signals are applied to the data line on the second unit or units connected to it, and it is observed whether a given signal state occurs on that line which clearly indicates the number of second units connected.

[0022] A system that communicates digitally, which solves this problem, is specified in claim 19.

[0023] Although in certain cases, the solution to the first or second problem mentioned above may meet the respective need alone, in another much preferred embodiment of the invention, whether it is the process or the digitally communicating system, a combination of the solutions mentioned in the invention to the two problems is proposed, according to the wording of claim 3 and claim 20.

[0024] As was mentioned, the problems on which this invention is based and their solution come from hearing aid development, considering the miniaturization and energy problems that exist with hearing aids.

[0025] Therefore, in another preferred embodiment, following the wording in claim 4, the first unit is a digital signal-processing unit of a hearing aid, and the second units are peripheral units of the hearing aid, like especially acoustic/electric converters, electric actuators, or for example T coils, controls, like potentiometers or switches, interface units, etc.

[0026] In another preferred embodiment of the invention, according to the wording of claim 5, the peripheral units work like acoustic/electric converters, for example and typically, over a preferably built-in A/D converter on the data line.

[0027] In another preferred embodiment of the invention, according to the wording of claim 6, the random signal is produced by the fact that the A/D converter working on the data output is given a noise signal on the input side, but preferably directly uses the quantization noises of an LSB (lowest significant bit) on the A/D converter output.

[0028] In terms of the solution to the conflict of which second unit can write when on the data line, according to the wording of claim 7, in one much preferred embodiment, the procedure is that only one of the second units provided can detect the predetermined signal state mentioned at the same time.

[0029] So when that state is detected on only one of the two units connected, then that it “knows” that, for example, a second unit is also connected. According to the wording of claim 8, the permission phase determined by the permission signal on the permission line WS for the second unit considered is now inverted, preferably on the second unit detecting that state first.

[0030] At the beginning, the initialization WS=‘1’ is the permission phase, so WS=‘0’ is defined as the permission phase on the second unit identifying. Thus, the second unit identifying acts “different” than or complementary to the second unit connected in terms of permission to write data: This resolves the conflict over writing data on the same data line SD.

[0031] In one preferred embodiment, the signal is detected on the data line at each second unit and is logically coupled to the random signal given at this unit prevailing at the same time, according to the wording of claim 9. The random signals of the second unit connected are also preferably placed on the data line via a “wired AND” interconnection—according to claim 10—and the presence of two second units is indicated when the state of the data line is ‘0’, but the state of the random signal assigned to it is ‘1’.

[0032] Because the first unit does not usually tolerate signals on the data-transmission line that are not defined electrically for an open input, it can be essential that a second unit considered connected also definitively know that there is no second one. This is achieved, according to the wording of claim 11, by the fact that every second unit connected considers itself alone on the second unit connected to the data line after a given span of time has gone by without it having detected the predetermined signal mentioned itself and without a random signal appearing on the data line in phases of the permission signal write-locked for it.

[0033] In one preferred embodiment according to the wording in claim 12, on the second unit, which has identified itself as the only one connected to the data line, in phases write-locked for it, a defined electrical potential is now applied to the data line, preferably a potential corresponding to the logic state ‘0’.

[0034] This makes it so that in the initialization phase, how many second units, one or two, are connected to the common data line is identified without the cooperation of the first unit. It also makes it so that if there are two units provided, the data-write competency is controlled and if there is only one second unit, electrical conditions are produced on the data line that, in any case, meet the requirements for the first unit.

[0035] Thus, the initialization phase mentioned preferably begins by turning on the electric power to the units mentioned and ends a certain number of SCL cycles later. This is according to the wording of claim 13.

[0036] According to claim 14, if more than two second units are connected to a single first unit, then it remains so for all units provided, when a common SCL clock line and a common permission line WS are used, while an additional data line is provided per other pair and/or per other initiated pair of the second unit provided. This keeps it so that only two second units can write to a common data line, on one hand, and the advantages of the three-wire bus connection are also used, on the other.

[0037] Regarding the identification and conflict resolution described above, if more than two second units are connected to the first unit, the configuration identification and conflict resolution are logically resolved per data line provided according to the invention.

[0038] Thus, after a given time span has expired in the initialization phase, the respective number of second units connected is known on all data lines provided, and permission to write data is given without conflict.

[0039] Particularly when more than two second units are connected to one first unit and, as mentioned, only one common permission line is working on all second units provided, it is necessary, if the first unit, according to claim 1, and the first aspect of this invention, should communicate with the second units over the permission line, that the second units connected can be addressed as receiver stations.

[0040] For this purpose, according to the wording of claim 15, addresses are produced on at least some of the second units connected by means of random digital signals, and preferably, after the prescribed initialization phase, by means of those random signals that were used in the initialization phase for the identification process, according to the wording of claim 2.

[0041] According to the wording of claim 16, the random addresses of every second unit are read on the first unit and compared with one another. According to the invention, the first unit (see claim 1) orders all second units, via the permission line, to generate new random addresses when at least two of the addresses compared are the same.

[0042] Then, according to the wording of claim 17, data signals from the first unit, and especially command data, are produced only within predetermined sections of phases of the permission signal, which ensures that no conflicts arise between the permission signals given on the permission line and the data signals mentioned.

[0043] Preferred embodiments of the system in the invention and a hearing aid with such a system are specified in claims 21 to 30:

[0044] The invention will now be explained by example using other figures.

[0045] FIG. 2 shows the system in the invention, which is capable of two-way communication, starting with the view in FIG. 1

[0046] FIG. 3 shows schematically the signal in the invention produced by superimposing the permission signal and data signal on the permission line on a time axis,

[0047] FIG. 4 shows one preferred embodiment of the output phase of the second unit in the invention, which works according to the invention, as preferably also used on the system in FIGS. 2 and 3, in the form of a simplified signal flow/function chart,

[0048] FIG. 5 is a view similar to FIG. 2 of the system in the invention with more than two second units that can be connected to a first unit,

[0049] FIG. 6 is a simplified function/signal flow chart that shows some of the preferably used output phase of a second unit used in the invention to produce addresses randomly.

[0050] FIG. 2 is a schematic view of the system in the invention, which works by the process in the invention. The same reference numbers are used as in FIG. 1. Unlike the procedure in FIG. 1, DSP1, which is connected to an output for the permission line WS, has a coder 10 and peripheral units 3a, 3b with a working connection to the input for the permission line WS, here a decoder 12.

[0051] FIG. 3 shows, on the time axis, the usual cyclic binary permission signal SWS, which is put on the permission line WS, as known and according to the known system in FIG. 1. In the one phase, corresponding to I3a, one of the peripheral units, for example 3a, is authorized to write data on data line SD, and in the complementary phase, II3b, the second peripheral unit connected, for example 3b, is. According to the invention, now within predetermined sections of the phase φ of the permission signal SWS by the coder 10 of DSP1, and as shown schematically in FIG. 3, data DA, especially command data, are transmitted to the peripheral units 3a, 3b and decoded there in the respective decoder 12. To address one or if necessary—as will still be explained—more of the peripheral units by DSP1 purposefully or selectively, the data DA superimposed on the SWS signals, if necessary, include call-up addresses for the corresponding peripheral units 3.

[0052] This makes it possible for two-way communication to be established between the peripheral units and the DSP1 over the three-wire bus connection, on one hand from the peripheral units to DSP1 over data line SD, and on the other hand, from DSP1 to the peripheral units 3 over the permission line WS.

[0053] Now, if the system hardware is configured according to FIG. 1 or—and preferably—according to FIG. 2, one or two peripheral units 3 can be provided. If the same permission signals SWS are first fed to the peripheral units 3 connected over the same permission line WS, and both units consider themselves entitled to write to data line SD first, for example in Phase I, as in FIG. 3, a conflict arises in terms of permission to write to line SD.

[0054] FIG. 4 is a schematic view of one preferred design of the output stages provided in the second aspect of the invention on the system in FIG. 1 and, preferably in FIG. 2, on the peripheral units 3. All peripheral units provided preferably in this aspect of the invention are built the same as far as the output stage shown in FIG. 4 is concerned. This is especially true of peripheral units on a hearing aid built with the system described. One or two peripheral units 3, bordered by dotted lines in FIG. 4, are connected to data line SD.

[0055] An A/D converter 14 works with its output A14 on a MOSFET output 16, via which the output signals A14 of the A/D converter of two units are placed on data line SD in a “wired AND” circuit.

[0056] In the initialization phase, i.e., the phase in which the prevailing hardware configuration of the system is identified and data-write conflicts are resolved, the input of the A/D converter 14 is connected by the effective signal path N to a noise source, like a resistor 18, for example, as is shown schematically by switch S18, for example. The flipping of switch S18 into the “random position” is preferably triggered by first applying the supply voltage to the system (not shown). At the same time, a timer 15 is triggered. With the A/D converter 14, a random generator is produced on the peripheral units connected, hence random generators independent of one another. First of all, the peripheral units connected 3 write in the permission phase, for example I in FIG. 3, the digital random signals so generated at the same time on the data line SD. In another much preferred form of embodiment, one or more pair of LSBs of the converter 14 are used as the random signals. Usually, the A/D converter produces a noise signal on its LSB. In this case, the resistor 18 working as an externally connected noise source is not necessary, and only the LSBs mentioned at output A14 are used.

[0057] The electrical signal prevailing at that moment on data line SD is picked up on each of the peripheral units 3 connected by an inverter 20 and is fed to an AND interconnection 22 with the prevailing output signal A14 of the A/D converter 14.

[0058] When the output signal of the A/D converter 14 is ‘1’ and the prevailing electric potential on the SD lines is ‘0’, this clearly means that a second peripheral unit is working on the data line SD, and with an output signal of it's a/D converter, which is on ‘0’ at the moment. This state, clearly indicating the presence of two peripheral units on the same data line SD, is recorded at interconnection 22 and stored, as shown schematically with the bistable element 24.

[0059] Because of the random signal placed on the data line SD, after a given period of time, this clear configuration-display signal stored on bistable element 24 will appear, with a probability dependent on the length of time selected, if two peripheral units are connected to line SD. The interconnection 22 makes sure that only one of the two peripheral units connected 3 can detect the state mentioned at the same time, so that one of these units will always be the first to detect that state.

[0060] With the setting of the bistable element 24, i.e., to identify that two peripheral units are working on data line SD, the permission signal of line WS acting on the enable input E of the A/D converter 14, for example, is inverted on the identifying peripheral unit, as shown schematically with the switch 25 and the inverter 26.

[0061] Now, permission to write for the identifying peripheral unit 3 is inverted in terms of the state formerly prevailing, hence switched to Phase II in FIG. 3, for example.

[0062] On the two identifying units 3 provided, the first unit identifying this has changed permission phases, while the second unit provided continues to write data in the permission phase previously prevailing, for example I in FIG. 3 on line SD. In any case, the peripheral unit 3 that does not identify that two such units are connected and whose bistable element 24 is not therefore on, has no information on whether a second unit is provided or whether it is the only one connected.

[0063] In many cases, however, it is essential—as explained below—that when only one peripheral unit is connected, it is identified directly and without doubt. Although the unit that has detected the presence of a second unit “knows” that two units are working on data line SD, on the other hand, a peripheral unit in which this state was not detected, does not know whether, if necessary, a second unit has already detected this state and has reacted accordingly or whether it is actually the only one connected.

[0064] If one peripheral unit on the system in FIG. 1 or FIG. 2 is the only one connected to data line SD, and writes data at the rate of permission signal SWS on permission line WS, the electrical potential of data line SD is not defined in phases when writing is not allowed. This is because, as shown with element 21 in FIG. 4, output ASD is connected “floating” by signal WS in non-write-permissible phases. This electrical state of data line SD is generally not allowed at the input ESD of DSP1, and usually cannot be considered, because the systems previously known are designed to work defined with two peripheral units 3.

[0065] One peripheral unit 3 considered is then connected to data line SD as the only one, if, on the one hand, the bistable element 24, is not set on it, i.e., this unit has not detected the presence of a second peripheral unit and in write-locked phases of the permission signal, no random digital signal is placed on the permission line WS on data line SD.

[0066] By logically interconnecting the inverted output signal of bistable element 24, the inverted permission signal on enabling input E of the A/D converter 14 and the inverted signal on data line SD, according to FIG. 4, as on the logic AND interconnection 30, on the output side of this interconnection, a ‘1’ signal is then produced if

[0067] no second unit was detected on the unit considered (element 24 not set), and

[0068] the permission signal is in a phase that does not permit this unit, and

[0069] during this permission phase no random signal is produced on the data line SD.

[0070] If this state is detected, another bistable element 32 is set, whose output is interconnected to the inverted permission signal SWS at a logic AND interconnection 34. As schematically with switching element 36, data line SD is switched to a defined, for example, reference potential in the write-locked phases of the unit 3 being considered if that unit is working alone on the data line.

[0071] This corresponds to placing ‘0’ signals on data line SD.

[0072] Now, in the initialization phase described, without DSP1 doing anything, both is any write conflict on data line SD ruled out, and it is made sure that if a single peripheral unit is connected, even in write-locked phases, a defined electrical potential will prevail on data line SD.

[0073] As can be seen, communication with DSP1 is not necessary for the initialization phase described, for example in FIG. 4. The initialization phase mentioned is preferably triggered when the supply voltages to the peripheral units connected are switched on, and hence also the timer 15 on each peripheral unit, which by counting, for example 4096 SCL cycles, determines how long the initialization phase mentioned should last. This time span is measured, especially as mentioned, for the safe quantity with which it should be detected whether two peripheral units 3 are connected to the common data line SD.

[0074] Thus, it can be seen that the first aspect of the invention, namely creating two-way communication, and the second aspect of the invention, namely identifying the configuration and resolving write-competency conflicts in the initialization phase, are independent of one another, but, as will be stated below, can preferably be combined, especially on a hearing aid with the digitally communicating system in the invention.

[0075] FIG. 5 shows the system in the invention, which is based on the basic system in FIG. 2, but in which one and the same DSP1 can have any number of peripheral units 3a , 3b . . . 3x connected to it.

[0076] In FIG. 5, the peripheral units 3x, for example, on a hearing aid with the system in the invention, made up of microphones, T-coils, potentiometers, wireless communication sending/receiving units and interface conductors, for example, are all provided with an A/D converter 14, as shown. Each of these units works as already explained and is designed, for example, as was shown in FIG. 4. All peripheral units 3x provided are connected to DSP1′ via the common clock line SCL and the common permission line WS. One data line SD1, SD2, SDy is provided per pair of peripheral units 3, and per pair started, according to FIG. 5, for the five peripheral units shown, for example, and hence their three, SD1, to SD3.

[0077] Such a system goes through the prescribed initialization phase for each pair of peripheral units 3x provided and for each data line SDy.

[0078] After the initialization procedure described above is over, there are no more write conflicts on the data lines, and one of the binary states of the permission signal SWS is assigned to the permission line WS of one of the peripheral units.

[0079] Especially with the configuration in FIG. 5, in which more than two peripheral units are connected to one DSP1′, however, there is the problem that the data transmission in the invention from DSP1 to peripheral units 3x should take place on the permission line WS in FIG. 2 or 3.

[0080] After the prescribed initialization phase is over, a “generate addresses” command is given by DSP1′ over the common permission line WS, as shown in FIG. 3, which is interpreted the same on all peripheral units connected 3x. The conclusion of the initialization phase is controlled by the timer 15, which first activates the decoding unit 12, as in FIG. 6, for example.

[0081] According to FIG. 6, the “generate addresses” command placed on permission line WS is decoded on the now free decoding units 12 of peripheral unit 3, everywhere so that the A/D converter 14 used as a random generator writes a random signal sequence on data line SD during a predetermined time t, on one hand, and at the same time files it in an address memory 409 as a random address, which forms an address with the permission findings in element 24, as in FIG. 4.

[0082] With a high degree of probability, based on the independence of the random generator on all peripheral units 3x, the random addresses filed in the respective address memories 40 and placed on the SD at the same time are not the same.

[0083] Of course, the respective peripheral units 32 write the random addresses in the write permission phases I and II in FIG. 3 of the permission signal on WS assigned to them in the initialization phase, which is not shown in FIG. 6.

[0084] Two peripheral units connected to one data line, for example SD1, always have different addresses, since the specification of their write permission was determined in terms of cycles on line WS and is part of the address.

[0085] Thus, it is established from the start that clearly addressable peripheral units are connected per individual data line considered SDx, since the permission phase determines the exclusive addresses with the storage state of element 24 in any case. But a case can occur where the address of a peripheral unit connected to a data line SD is the same as the address of a peripheral unit connected to another data line SD, hence units with the same write-permission phase. If this is determined on DSP 1, another “generate addresses” command is triggered, specifically to the peripheral units found to be the same, by their common addressing. This goes on until all peripheral units connected have filed different addresses in memories 40, 24 and they are also posted in DSP1′.

[0086] Because of the independence of the random generators used, this procedure is also completed in a short time for several peripheral units.

[0087] Of course, it is also possible to provide addresses programmed practically into the hardware on at least some of the peripheral units provided beforehand, for example in the ROM.

[0088] The process and the communications system described provide a highly simple, versatile connection based on a three-line bus connection, which is especially suitable for use in hearing aids.

Claims

1. A process for digital communication between a first unit (DSP 1), which has at least one input (ESD) for serial digital data, at least two second units (3a,3b) with a data output (ASD) for serial, digital data, whereby the input (ESD) of the first unit (DSP1) is connected via a common data line (SD) to the outputs (ASD) of the second units (3a, 3b) connected to it, and in the process, serial, digital data are supplied from the second units (3a, 3b) to the first (DSP1) over the data line (SD) mentioned, controlled by a binary permission signal fed to the second units (3a, 3b), connected together over a permission line (WS), and a clock signal fed together to the units connected via a clock line (SCL), characterized by the fact that the first unit (DSP1) communicates with the second (3a, 3b) over the permission line (WS), by superimposing data signals (DA) on the binary permission signal on the first unit (DSP1) and by receiving and evaluating them on the second unit (3a, 3b).

2. In a process for digital communication between a first unit (DSP1), which has at least one input (ESD) for serial digital data, at least two second units (3a,3b) with a data output (ASD) for serial, digital data, whereby the input (ESD) of the first unit (DSP 1) is connected via a common data line (SD) to the outputs (ASD) of the second units (3a, 3b) connected to it, and in the process, serial, digital data are supplied from the second units (3a, 3b) to the first (DSP 1) over the data line (SD) mentioned, controlled by a binary permission signal fed to the second units (3a, 3b), connected together over a permission line (WS), and a clock signal fed together to the units connected via a clock line (SCL); a process for identifying how many second units (3a, 3b) are connected to the first (DSP1), characterized by the fact that serial, digital random signals, each independent of the other, are placed on the common data line (SD) at the second units (3a, 3b) connected, and the signal on the data line (SD) detects whether a predetermined signal state occurs, which clearly expresses the number of second units actually connected.

3. The process in claim 1, further comprising a process for identifying how many second units (3a, 3b) are connected to the first (DSP1), characterized by the fact that serial, digital random signals, each independent of the other, are placed on the common data line (SD) at the second units (3a, 3b) connected, and the signal on the data line (SD) detects whether a predetermined signal state occurs, which clearly expresses the number of second units actually connected.

4. The process in one of claims 1 to 3, characterized by the fact that the first unit (DSP1) is a digital signal-processing unit of a hearing aid, and the second units (3a-3x) are the peripheral units of a hearing aid, like especially acoustic/electric converters, electric actuators, T coils, controls like potentiometers or switches, interface units.

5. The process in claim 4, characterized by the fact that the peripheral units of the hearing aid work on the data line (SD) via an A/D converter (14).

6. The process in one of claims 1 or 2, characterized by the fact that random signals are produced by sending a noise signal (18) to an A/C converter (14) working on the data outputs (ASD) on the input side. or, and preferably, using A/D converter—LSB—output signals as noise signals.

7. The process in claim 2, characterized by the fact that the predetermined signal state is simultaneously only detectable on one of the second units connected.

8. The process in claim 7, characterized by the fact that on the second unit (3a, 3b) that first detects the given state mentioned, the permission phase (I, II) detected by the permission signal (SWS) on the permission line (WS) is inverted.

9. The process in claim 2, characterized by the fact that the signal on the data line (SD) on each second unit connected (3a, 3b) is logically interconnected with the signal of the signal placed on that unit by means of a random generator on the data line.

10. The process in claim 2, characterized by the fact that the random signals of the second units (3a, 3b, 3x) connected are placed on the data line via a “wired AND” interconnection.

11. The process in one of claims 7 to 10, characterized by the fact that when during a predetermined time span, a second unit (3a, 3b, 3x) that is turned on has not detected the predetermined signal state and no random signal on the data line (SD) is detected on that unit in permission-blocked phases (II) of the permission signal (SWS), the second unit concludes that it is the only one connected to the data line (SD).

12. The process in claim 11, characterized by the fact that a second unit connected, which identifies itself as the only one connected to the data line (SD), during permission-blocked phases (II) of the permission signal (SWS), switches a defined electric potential on the data line, preferably corresponding to the logic state ‘0.’

13. The process in claim 2, characterized by the fact that the identification process is triggered by turning on the electric power to the units.

14. The process in one of claims 1 to 2, characterized by the fact that more than two second units (3x) can be connected to a first unit (DSP1′) and by the fact that for each initiated pair of other second units (3x) another data line (SDx) to another input (ESDx) of the first unit (DSP1′) is provided and for all second units together, a clock line (SCL) and a permission line (WS) are used.

15. The process in one of claims 1 to 2, characterized by the fact that on at least some of the connected second units, addresses (A) are produced by means of digital random signals.

16. The process in claim 15, characterized by the fact that the addresses (A) produced are read in on the first unit (DSP1′) and then all second units are controlled by the first unit (DSP1′) over the permission line (WS), to produce new addresses (A) by means of the random signals, when the addresses read in are identical.

17. The process in one of claims 1 or 3, characterized by the fact that the data signals superimposed by the first unit (DSP1, DSP1′) are produced within a predetermined section of the phase of the permission signal (SWS) on it (SWS).

18. A digitally communicating system, including: a first digital processing unit (DSP1), which has at least one input (ESD) for serial digital data, at least two second units that can be connected to one data output (ASD) for serial digital data whereby the input (ESD) of the first unit (DSP1, DSP1′) is connected over a common data line (SD) to the outputs (ASD) of the second units (3a, 3b) connected, and the first unit (DSP1, DSP1′) is connected by means of a common permission line (WS) to the second units (3a, 3b) connected, whereby the first unit produces a binary permission signal (SWS) on this permission line, and the second units connected controlled by the permission signal, time-staggered for writing data on the common data line (SD) are controlled and released, whereby the units are connected by means of a common clock line (SCL), characterized by the fact that a coding unit (ENC) is provided on the first unit (DSP1) to superimpose data signals on the permission signal (SWS) on the permission line (WS) and by the fact that a decoding unit (DEC) is connected to the input of the permission line (WS) on each second unit connected (3a,3b, 3x), in order to decode data signals (DA) superimposed on the permission signal (SWS) in addition to data write permission (SW).

19. A digitally communicating system, including: a first digital processing unit (DSP1), which has at least one input (ESD) for serial digital data, at least two second units that can be connected to one data output (ASD) for serial digital data whereby the input (ESD) of the first unit (DSP1, DSP1′) is connected over a common data line (SD) to the outputs (ASD) of the second units (3a, 3b) connected, and the first unit (DSP1, DSP1′) is connected by means of a common permission line (WS) to the second units (3a, 3b) connected, whereby the first unit produces a binary permission signal (SWS) on this permission line, and the second units connected controlled by the permission signal, time-staggered for writing data on the common data line (SD) are controlled and released, whereby the units are connected by means of a common clock line (SCL) characterized by the fact that a digital random generator (14, 18) can be connected to work with the data line (SD) on each second unit connected and controlled (3a, 3b, 3x), and a comparison unit (22) is also provided, which is connected to work with the data line (SD) and the random generator output.

20. The system in claim 18, further characterized by the fact that a digital random generator (14, 18) can be connected to work with the data line (SD) on each second unit connected and controlled (3a, 3b, 3x), and a comparison unit (22) is also provided, which is connected to work with the data line (SD) and the random generator output.

21. A hearing aid with the system in one of claims 18 to 20, characterized by the fact that the first unit is a digital signal-processing unit of the hearing aid, and the second units are peripheral units assigned to the processing unit, like especially acoustic/electric converters, electric actuators, T coils, controls, such as potentiometers or switches, etc.

22. The hearing aid in claim 21, characterized by the fact that each second unit (3a, 3b,3x) has an A/D converter (14) which is connected to work with the output (ASF) for the data line (SD).

23. The system in one of claims 19 to 20, characterized by the fact that the random generator has an A/D converter (14).

24. The system in one of claims 19 to 20, characterized by the fact that the output of the comparison unit (22) inverts the working connection of an input for the permission line (WS) on a write unit (14), which is connected to work with the output (ASD) for the data line (SD), in terms of the binary signal on the input mentioned (24).

25. The system in one of claims 19 to 20, characterized by the fact that the output (A14) of the random generators (14) of the second units (3a, 3b) connected to the data line (SD) are connected to work with that line (SD) over a “wired AND” interconnection.

26. The system in one of claims 19 to 20, characterized by the fact that each second unit connected (3a, 3b) has a controllable switching arrangement (36), which is connected to the output (ASD) for the data line (SD) and lays it, controlled by the permission signal on the permission line (WS), on a defined electric potential.

27. The system in one of claims 19 to 20, characterized by the fact that random generators (14) provided on the second units connected are set in operation by turning on the supply voltage to the second units.

28. The system in one of claims 18 to 20, characterized by the fact that more than two second units (3x) can be connected to one and the same first unit (DSP1′), whereby the clock line (SCL) and the permission line (WS) run from the first unit (DSP1′) together to all peripheral units connected, and a single data line (SDx) runs to the first unit (DSP1′) per pair and/or initiated pair of second units (3x) connected.

29. The system in one of claims 18 to 20, characterized by the fact that a random generator (14) can be connected to each second unit with the data line output (ASD), and they can be triggered by a predetermined sequence of signals on the permission line, whereby a sequence of random signals placed on the data line (SD) on the respective peripheral unit is stored in one memory (40) each, the name sequence on the first unit (DSP1′).

30. The system in claim 29, characterized by the fact that the sequence and—in terms of the permission signal on the permission line (WS)—the write-permission phase are stored as addresses on the second unit and on the first unit in the respective address memory arrangements, and the address memory arrangement on the first unit (DSP1′) is connected to a comparison unit, which triggers another sequence of signals on the permission line to second units with identical addresses.

31. The system in one of claims 18 or 20, characterized by the fact that the coding unit (ENC) on the first unit (DSP1, DSP1′) is connected to a time-control unit, which allows superimposed signals (DA) to be given to the permission line (WS) only at predetermined intervals of time in the permission signal cycle.

32. The process in one of claims 1 or 2, characterized by the fact that random signals are produced using A/D converter LSB output signals as noise signals.