This patent application is the U.S. national phase of International Application No. PCT/EP2017/057766, filed on Mar. 31, 2017, which claims the benefit of European Patent Application No. 16163748.3, filed Apr. 4, 2016, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.
The invention refers to a process for metallization of an article having a plastic surface avoiding the metallization of the rack which fixes the article within the plating bath.
The process comprises an etching step with an etching solution being free of hexavalent chromium, a treatment of the plastic surface with a reducing agent and a metallization step. Furthermore, the process comprises a treatment of the plastic surface with an aqueous rack conditioning solution.
Contacting the plastic surface with the rack conditioning solution provides selective protection of the rack from metallization whereas the article with the plastic surface is selectively metalized.
In general, the preparation of plastic articles for metal (e.g. nickel) deposition requires an etching of the plastic article. It is known that such etching may be performed with a solution containing hexavalent chromium and sulphuric acid. However, hexavalent chromium is highly toxic for humans and the environment. Since it is considered to be carcinogenic, mutagen and reprotoxic and is present in the list of substances submitted to authorization in the REACH directive, there is a large interest in the field to abolish the use of etching solutions which are based on hexavalent chromium.
As an alternative to hexavalent chromium, etching solutions comprising potassium permanganate are known. However, said Cr6+-free etching solutions suffer the drawback that they are less capable of preventing metallization of the rack having a plastic surface— usually a plastic surface of polyvinyl chloride (“PVC”)— which fixes the article with the surface to be metallized (usually a surface comprising or consisting of ABS) in place during electroless and/or electrolytic deposition. Metallisation of the fixing rack is not desired because it unnecessarily depletes the electrolyte of metal, pollutes the electrolytic bath, creates problems regarding the operating plating parameters management and consequently creates a problem regarding the thickness of metal on the finished metallized articles. Moreover, it finally obliges to remove the metallic deposits (e.g. copper, nickel, chromium) from the rack surface which is costly and takes time.
In the prior art, several processes are known to prevent metallisation of the plastic surface of the rack during electroless deposition.
WO 2015/126544 A1 discloses a process for preventing rack metallisation, wherein the rack is treated with a non-aqueous solution comprising a metallisation inhibitor. In said process, the plastic coated rack is immersed in said non-aqueous solution before the etching step (e.g. with permanganate) takes place. As metallisation inhibitor, an organic sulphur compound is used at a very high concentration of 5 to 40 g/L. The drawback of said process is the use of a relatively high concentration of metallisation inhibitor which is responsible for a drag-out of metallization inhibitor and a “pollution” of the solutions used in successive steps. Finally, WO 2015/126544 A1 teaches the use of a non-aqueous solution which is unecological. In addition, it has been found that the use of non-aqueous solvents is prone to deteriorate the plastic surface of the rack (usually comprising or consisting of PVC) making the process inefficient on an economical point of view.
WO 2016/022535 A1 discloses a method of coating an electroplating rack used for supporting non-conductive substrates during a plating process. The method comprises the steps of contacting at least a portion of the electroplating rack with a plastisol composition, the plastisol composition having dispersed therein an effective amount of an additive that is a sulphur derivative with the structure reported in the description.
This method shows several drawbacks, first of all it is economically unfavourable as it requires to produce new PVC plastisols containing the inhibitor. Secondly, the incorporation of the inhibitor in the plastisol will not necessarily conduct to the presence of the inhibitor at the surface of the plastisol and consequently is not as efficient in preventing rack metallisation compared to the present invention. In addition, the incorporation of such high amounts of inhibitors (5 to 15% by weight) in the plastisol will lead to a high risk of release of the inhibitor in the plating line especially when the racks will age and consequently will contaminate the line and makes the process non effective.
WO 2013/135862 A2 discloses a process for preventing rack metallisation, wherein the rack is treated with an aqueous solution comprising a metallisation inhibitor. In said process, the plastic rack is contacted with the aqueous solution either before or after the etching step (e.g. with permanganate) takes place. As metallisation inhibitor, metal iodate is used at a very high concentration of 5 to 50 g/L. The drawback of said process is that a very high concentration of metallization inhibitor is used which creates a problem of “pollution” of the solutions used in the successive steps of the process (e.g. a pollution of the catalyst solution, accelerator solution and electroless bath in general). Thus, the long-term stability of the process is low. Moreover, a high concentration of inhibitor and permanganate ions (30 to 250 g/L) is needed to obtain the desired effect which is uneconomical.
Starting therefrom, it was the object to provide a more long-term stable, more economical and more ecological process for selective metallization of an article having a plastic surface without metallization of the plastic rack which fixes the article.
The problem is solved by the process described herein. Also described are preferred embodiments of the invention.
According to the invention, a process is provided for metallization of an article having a plastic surface comprising the steps
The term “plastic surface” refers to the plastic surface of the article. If the rack has a plastic surface, the term “plastic surface” refers to the plastic surface of the rack as well.
The inventive process has the advantage that a rack conditioning solution is used which is aqueous and acidic. The benefit of the solution being aqueous is that it is more environmentally friendly compared to non-aqueous (organic solvent based) solutions. The advantage of the solution being acidic is that it is compatible with the reducing agent addition. This allows reducing the number of process steps and no (additional) reduction step has necessarily to be performed after the etching step and before the rack conditioning step. It has furthermore been discovered that implementing the etching step before the rack conditioning step is beneficial compared to implementing the etching step afterwards (like in some prior art processes). It has been found that performing the etching step after the rack conditioning step at least partly removes the beneficial effect of the rack conditioning step, probably by washing away and oxidizing the organosulfur compound bound to the surface of the plastic rack.
The organosulfur compound may be an organosulfur compound containing bivalent sulphur. According to the invention, an “organosulfur compound containing bivalent sulfur” is an organosulfur compound represented by the formula R—SH, R″—S—R″, wherein R, R′ and R″ represent an organic group (i.e. a carbon-containing group) and R′ and R″ may be the same or may be different. Preferably, the organosulfur compound is an organosulfur compound represented by the formula R—SH, wherein R represents an organic group, i.e. the organosulfur compound is an organic compound comprising a thiol residue. Particularly preferred, the organosulfur compound is selected from the group consisting of dithiocarbamates, 2-mercaptobenzimidazole, 2-mercaptobenzothiazole, 3-mercaptopropansulfonic acid sodium salt, thioglycolic acid, 3-(benzothiazolyl-2-mercapto)propyl sulfonic acid sodium salt, and mixtures thereof. More preferably, the organosulfur compound is 2-mercaptobenzothiazole.
The organosulfur compound used in the inventive process may have a concentration of 0.001 to 2 g/L, preferably 0.01 to 1 g/L, more preferably 0.05 to 0.2 g/L, most preferably 0.1 g/L, in the solution.
It is preferred that at least one inorganic acid in the rack conditioning solution is preferably selected from the group consisting of hydrochloric acid, sulphuric acid, phosphoric acid, and mixtures thereof, most preferably hydrochloric acid wherein the concentration of the inorganic acid in the rack conditioning solution is from 0.01 to 2 mol/L, preferably 0.05 to 1.5 mol/L, more preferably 0.08 to 0.6 mol/L.
The treatment with the reducing agent, i. e. step c) of the process, can be a separate step by treating the etched plastic rack with an aqueous reducing solution. Optionally, the reducing agent can be added to the rack conditioning solution which results in a simultaneous treatment with the reducing agent and the conditioning solution. It is also possible to use both options together.
The reducing agent is preferably suitable to chemically reduce manganese compounds, e.g. manganese compounds coming from the drag out of the treatment with etching solution and from remaining etching residues present on the plastic surface. Suitable reducing compounds include compounds having a hydroxylamine group, ascorbic acid, hydrazine, thiosulfate salts, and mixtures thereof. Preferably, the compound comprising a hydroxylamine group is hydroxylamine sulphate. The reducing agent may have a concentration of 1 to 100 g/L, preferably 10 to 40 g/L, more preferably 20 g/L, in the solution.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the aqueous acidic rack conditioning solution comprises at least one thickening agent, preferably selected from the group consisting of polyvinyl alcohol, PEG, sodium alginate, polysaccharides, agarose, carboxymethylcellulose, and mixtures thereof, more preferably carboxymethylcellulose; wherein the concentration of the at least one thickening agent in the rack conditioning solution is from 0.001 to 10 g/L, preferably 0.01 to 1 g/L, more preferably 0.05 to 0.2 g/L, most preferably 0.1 g/L. It has been observed that having a thickening agent in the aqueous acidic rack conditioning solution provokes that during the treatment with the aqueous acidic rack conditioning solution, the organosulfur compound is better adsorbed to the plastic surface of the rack, especially better adsorbed into holes located on the plastic surface of the rack. In essence, the thickening agent provides a more thorough adsorption of a larger quantity of organosulfur compound to the plastic surface of the rack and thus leads to an improved prevention of rack metallization.
It is further preferred that the aqueous rack conditioning solution has a temperature of 25 to 70° C., preferably 45 to 60° C., most preferably 45 to 55° C.; and/or the plastic surface is treated with the aqueous rack conditioning solution for 0.1 to 15 min, preferably 0.5 to 10 min, most preferably 1 to 5 min.
In the preferred embodiment the plastic surface of the article at least partially comprises or consists of a plastic selected from the group consisting of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene-blends, polypropylene and mixtures thereof, preferably acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene-polycarbonate blends and mixtures thereof.
Preferably, the rack does not comprise a plastic surface like the plastic surface of the article, wherein the rack is preferably
Naturally, the rack may comprise additives, plasticizers, dyes and/or fillers.
It is preferred that before step b), the plastic surface is cleaned with a cleaning solution, which preferably comprises at least one wetting agent for cleaning and/or a solvent for swelling, wherein the cleaning solution preferably has a temperature of 30 to 70° C., preferably 40 to 60° C., more preferably 45 to 55° C. and the plastic surface is preferably treated with the cleaning solution for 1 to 10 min, preferably 2 to 8 min, most preferably 4 to 6 min.
It is preferred that the etching solution comprises KMnO4 and phosphoric acid, wherein the etching solution has preferably a temperature of 50 to 80° C., preferably 60 to 70° C., more preferably 65 to 70° C. and the plastic surface is treated with the etching solution for 2 to 20 min, preferably 4 to 18 min, most preferably 8 to 15 min. Preferably an oxidizing agent as a stabilizer can be added for stabilizing MnVII in the etching solution.
It is preferred that the aqueous acidic reducing solution comprises at least one inorganic acid and a reducing agent. The inorganic acid is preferably selected from the group consisting of hydrochloric acid, sulphuric acid, phosphoric acid, and mixtures thereof, most preferably hydrochloric acid, wherein the concentration of the at least one inorganic acid is from 0.5 to 2.5 mol/L, most preferably 1 to 2 mol/L. The reducing agent includes compounds having a hydroxylamine group, ascorbic acid, hydrazine, thiosulfate salts, and mixtures thereof. Preferably, the compound comprising a hydroxylamine group is hydroxylamine sulphate. The reducing agent may have a concentration of 1 to 100 g/L, preferably 10 to 40 g/L, more preferably 20 g/L, in the solution. It is further preferred that the aqueous reducing solution has a temperature of 45 to 70° C., preferably 45 to 60° C., most preferably 45 to 55° C.; and the plastic surface is treated with the aqueous reducing solution for 0.1 to 15 min, preferably 0.5 to 10 min, most preferably 1 to 5 min.
After any one or all of steps a) to d) and the treatment step with the rack conditioning solution of the inventive method, the plastic surface may be rinsed, preferably rinsed with water.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, metalizing the plastic surface comprises at least one, preferably all, of the steps of
With reference to the following examples, the subject-matter according to the invention is intended to be explained in more detail without wishing to restrict said subject-matter to the specific embodiments shown here.
The Solutions Used in the Successive Examples have the Following Composition:
The sequence of use of said compositions is shown in
The articles having a surface comprising or consisting of ABS are panels molded in ABS Novodur P2MC. The racks used for fixing the articles to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
The articles having a surface comprising or consisting of ABS are panels molded in ABS Novodur P2MC. The racks used for fixing the articles to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
The articles having a surface comprising or consisting of ABS are panels molded in ABS Novodur P2MC. The racks used for fixing the articles to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
In all these examples (1, 2 and 3), whether the reduction solution and rack conditioning solution were used separately or a combined reduction/rack conditioning solution was used, the PVC metallization is prevented.
The articles having a surface comprising or consisting of ABS are panels molded in ABS Novodur P2MC. The racks used for fixing the articles to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
The articles having a surface comprising or consisting of ABS are panels molded in ABS Novodur P2MC. The racks used for fixing the articles to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
The results of the examples 4 and 5 allow the conclusion that the treatment of the articles with ABS surface with the rack conditioning solution does not prevent metallization of their ABS surface whereas the metallization of the PVC surface of the racks is effectively prevented. However, prevention of the PVC surface metallization is only observed if the treatment with the rack conditioning solution is performed after the etching step and not if it is performed before the etching step.
The articles having a surface comprising or consisting of ABS/PC are panels molded in ABS/PC BAYBLEND T45. The racks used for fixing the articles to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
The articles having a surface comprising or consisting of ABS/PC are panels molded in ABS/PC BAYBLEND T45. The racks used for fixing the articles to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
The articles having a surface comprising or consisting of ABS/PC are panels molded in ABS/PC BAYBLEND T45. The racks used for fixing the articles to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
In the examples 6, 7 and 8, whether the reduction solution and rack conditioning solution were used separately or a combined reduction/rack conditioning solution was used, the PVC metallization is prevented.
The articles having a surface comprising or consisting of ABS/PC are panels molded in ABS/PC BAYBLEND T45. The racks used for fixing the articles to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
The articles having a surface comprising or consisting of ABS/PC are panels molded in ABS/PC BAYBLEND T45. The racks used for fixing the articles to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
The results of the example 9 and 10 allow the conclusion that the treatment of the articles with ABS/PC surface with the rack conditioning solution does not prevent metallization of their ABS/PC surface whereas the metallization of the PVC surface of the racks is effectively prevented. Again, prevention of rack metallization is only observed if the treatment with the rack conditioning solution is performed after the etching step and not if it is performed before the etching step.
The article to be metalized has two different plastic surfaces i.e. is a bi-component plastic article comprising ABS on one part of its surface and PC on another part of its surface (ABS-PC bi-component). Said article is specifically common in the automotive market. The racks used for fixing the article to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
The article to be metalized has two different plastic surfaces i.e. is a bi-component plastic article comprising ABS on one part of its surface and PC on another part of its surface (ABS-PC bi-component). Said article is specifically common in the automotive market. The racks used for fixing the article to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
The results of the examples 11 and 12 allow the conclusion that the treatment of the bi-component article with the rack conditioning solution does not prevent metallization of the ABS surface of the bi-component article whereas the metallization of the PC surface of the bi-component article is effectively prevented (=selective metallization of ABS surface compared to PC surface). In addition, the metallization of the PVC surface of the rack is effectively prevented (=selective metallization of ABS surface compared to PVC surface). This allows the conclusion that the treatment of article with the rack conditioning solution after the etching step provokes a very selective metallization of surfaces comprising or consisting of ABS compared to other types of plastic surfaces (e.g. PC and PVC surfaces).
The article to be metalized has two different plastic surfaces i.e. is a bi-component plastic article comprising ABS on one part of its surface and PCTA on another part on its surface (ABS-PCTA bi-component). Said article is specifically common in the perfume taps market. The racks used for fixing the article to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
The article to be metalized has two different plastic surfaces i.e. is a bi-component plastic article comprising ABS on one part of its surface and PCTA on another part on its surface (ABS-PCTA bi-component). Said article is specifically common in the perfume taps market. The racks used for fixing the article to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
The results of the examples 13 and 14 allow the conclusion that the treatment of the bi-component article with the rack conditioning solution does not prevent metallization of the ABS surface of the bi-component plastic article whereas the metallization of the PCTA surface of the bi-component plastic article is effectively prevented (=selective metallization of ABS surfaces compared to PCTA surfaces). In addition, the metallization of the PVC surface of the rack is effectively prevented (=selective metallization of ABS surfaces compared to PVC surfaces). This allows the conclusion that the treatment of plastic articles with the rack conditioning solution after the etching step provokes a very selective metallization of surfaces comprising or consisting of ABS compared to other types of plastic surfaces (e.g. PCTA and PVC surfaces).
The articles having a surface comprising or consisting of ABS are panels molded in ABS Novodur P2MC. The racks used for fixing the articles to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
From the EDX measurement made on the ABS and PVC surface immediately after rinse of the reduction step, only traces of sulfur element is detected both on the ABS surface and on the PVC surface due probably to pollution or background noise of the EDX measurement.
From the SEM pictures made on the ABS and PVC surface immediately after rinse of the reduction step,
The articles having a surface comprising or consisting of ABS are panels molded in ABS Novodur P2MC. The racks used for fixing the articles to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
From the EDX measurement made on the ABS and PVC surface immediately after rinse of the reduction/rack conditioning step, a sulfur content is increased about 2 times on the PVC surface compared to ABS surface. The sulfur content on the ABS surface remained substantially unchanged in comparison to the example 15.
From the SEM pictures made on the ABS and PVC surface immediately after rinse of the reduction/rack conditioning step,
The articles having a surface comprising or consisting of ABS are panels molded in ABS Novodur P2MC. The racks used for fixing the articles to be metalized have a PVC surface.
The result of the experiment is shown in
From the EDX measurement made on the ABS and PVC surface immediately after the rinse of the reduction/rack conditioning step, the sulfur content is highly increased on the PVC surface by the addition of the thickening agent in the rack conditioning step, when on the ABS surface, the sulfur content remained substantially unchanged in comparison to the examples 15 and 16.
From the SEM pictures made on the ABS and PVC surface immediately after the rinse of the reduction/rack conditioning step,
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
16163748 | Apr 2016 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/057766 | 3/31/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/174470 | 10/12/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3443988 | McCormack et al. | May 1969 | A |
3930963 | Polichette et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
4610895 | Tubergen et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
7025867 | Czeczka et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20040112755 | Czeczka et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20100120962 | Yoshida | May 2010 | A1 |
20100155255 | Nagao | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20150001177 | Middeke | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150307992 | Naruskevicius et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160258066 | Hiei | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1329557 | Aug 2007 | CN |
102409320 | Apr 2012 | CN |
104005028 | Aug 2014 | CN |
104499019 | Apr 2015 | CN |
3 168 326 | May 2017 | EP |
3 216 756 | Sep 2017 | EP |
60-77994 | May 1985 | JP |
2006-316350 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2006316350 | Nov 2006 | JP |
WO 2013135862 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO 2015126544 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO 2016006301 | Jan 2016 | WO |
WO 2016022535 | Feb 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Gezernnan et al., “2-Mercaptobenzinnidazole, 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole, and Thioglycolic Acid in an Electroless Nickel-Plating Bath,” Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2015, Article ID 872516, pp. 1-11. (Year: 2015). |
European Patent Office, International Search Report in International Application No. PCT/EP2017/057766 (dated May 12, 2017). |
European Patent Office, Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/EP2017/057766 (dated May 12, 2017). |
International Bureau of WIPO, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application No. PCT/EP2017/057766 (dated Oct. 9, 2018). |
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC in European Patent Application No. 17 714 784.0 (dated Jul. 19, 2019). |
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC in European Patent Application No. 17 714 784.0 (dated Dec. 11, 2019). |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People'S Republic of China, First Office Action and Search Report in Chinese Patent Application No. 201780022493.0 (dated May 22, 2020). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190112712 A1 | Apr 2019 | US |