The present invention concerns a stent for angioplasty and an associated method of production thereof.
The term “stent for angioplasty” is intended to indicate generally devices intended for endoluminal application (for example, within a blood vessel) in association with the technique of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or PTCA, usually effected by catheterisation of a stenotic site.
Expanding the stent at the site causes the lumen to expand giving rise to the consequent elimination of the stenosis, and the local support of the lumen by the stent, which is left in place expanded, avoids restenosis of the treated site due to the subsequent relaxation of the blood vessel wall. The use of a substantially similar structure for deploying vascular grafts and fixing them in place has already been proposed in the art: naturally, this possible extension of the field of application should be seen as included within the ambit of the present invention.
For a general review of vascular stents, reference may usefully be made to the work “Textbook of Interventional Cardiology” edited by Eric J. Topol, W.B. Saunders Company, 1994 and, in particular, to section IV of volume II, entitled “Coronary Stenting”.
Many patent documents have addressed this problem, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,776,337, U.S. Pat. No. 4,800,882, U.S. Pat. No. 4,907,336, U.S. Pat. No. 4,886,062, U.S. Pat. No. 4,830,003, U.S. Pat. No. 4,856,516, U.S. Pat. No. 4,768,507 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,503,569.
The implantation of these devices, which is a factor in the treatment of various cardiac diseases, may require, or at least gain particular benefit from the possibility of being able to administer at the stent-implantation site agents or active principles (the two terms being used below in an equivalent sense) having various end purposes: they may, for example, be antithrombogenic agents or, more generally, agents for directly resisting restenosis of the treated site due to the formation of deposits, tissue proliferation, etc. In relation to this, reference may usefully be made to the following works:
“Local Drug Delivery: The Development of a Drug Delivery Stent” by Richard Stack, The Journal of Invasive Cardiology, Vol. 8, n. 8, October 1996, pp 396-397;
“Local Intraluminal Infusion of Biodegradable Polymeric Nanoparticles” by Louis A. Guzman et al., Circulation, 1996; 94; pp 1441-1448;
“Local Angiopeptin Delivery Using Coated Stents Reduces Neointimal Proliferation in Overstretched Porcine Coronary Arteries” by Ivan De Schreerder et al., the Journal of Invasive Cardiology, Vol. 8, n. 8, October 1996, pp 215-222.
Many applicational problems arise from this mode of operation, mostly related to the specific solutions adopted. For example, the problem exists of avoiding the agent or agents intended for administration in the zone of the stent being delivered or transported to different areas where they may have negative or damaging effects. Other problems may arise, for example, in ensuring the permanence and the gradual release over time of active substances capable of being, as it were, washed away by the blood passing through the stent.
These problems cannot themselves be solved or avoided by recourse to other solutions such as radioactive stents or so-called biodegradable stents, as illustrated, for example, in the work “Biodegradable Stents: The Future of Interventional Cardiology?” by M. Labinaz et al; Journal of International Cardiology, Vol. 8, n. 4, 1995, pp 395-405. Radioactive stents publicly proposed so far give rise to other problems related essentially to the fact that, in most cases, their use assumes the typical features of radiotherapy and/or nuclear medicine. The main disadvantage of biodegradable stents is that, at least in the long term when the stent has completely or substantially degraded, there is a reduction in the mechanical support of the blood vessel wall against the risk of collapse.
As a further solution for administering various kinds of active principle at the stent-implantation site a solution has recently been proposed in which at least a portion of the surface of the body of the stent (or implantation device in general) is coated with a receptor capable of binding with a ligand formed by combining an active principle with a substance capable of binding to the receptor.
In order for this new solution to be fully beneficial, that is, so that it can also be used with more conventional techniques for effective topical administration of the active principles, it appears important to obtain a good adhesion and/or retention on the stent of the substance or substances with which these active principles are associated and/or are intended to be associated.
In relation to this it is therefore necessary to take account of various concomitant factors which often oppose one another.
In a significant number of applications it is important that the active principles are present mainly, although not exclusively, on the outer surface of the stent. Conversely, it is usually desirable that the inner surface of the stent itself is as inert as possible, that is, both from the chemical point of view and from the point of view of the possible mechanical anchorage of possible deposits.
This is the reason why currently available vascular stents are subjected to a polishing process, intended to make the surface of the stent (both inside and outside) very smooth. In relation to this, it is also possible to coat the stent with a layer of biocompatible material, such as a biocompatible carbon material (deposited, for example, using sputtering techniques), so as to confer a high degree of hemocompatability on the whole stent. Adopting this technique for the deposition of such a layer, given the very small dimensions of a stent for angioplasty, means that it is practically impossible to limit the deposition to just the inside surface of the stent. Consequently therefore, the entire surface of the stent is coated with a layer which, by its nature, makes the deposition of substances on the stent itself, in fact, impossible.
A further factor should not be forgotten: a stent for angioplasty is by its nature a heavily apertured structure, usually a mesh-like structure in which, especially in the radially-extended position, the effective surface intended to come into contact with the blood vessel wall is a small fraction of the theoretical tubular surface area defined by the outside of the stent itself. In other words: even by putting the other problems described above to one side, there is very little available surface on the stent for carrying the active principles intended for local delivery.
The object of the present invention is that of resolving the disadvantages described above.
In particular, the solution according to the invention, having the characteristics referred to in the following claims, enables the selective application, specifically to the outer surface only of the stent, of a completely effective quantity of active principle (either directly or in the form of a receptor capable of binding with a ligand carrying the active principle) without by this losing the possibility of having a very smooth surface, at least inside the stent, even if clad with coatings such as haemocompatible carbon coatings.
The invention, which concerns a stent as well as the associated procedure for the manufacture thereof, will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, comprising
In all of the accompanying Figures, the reference numeral 1 indicates a wall portion of a stent for angioplasty. By way of example,
The specific details of construction of the stent and, in particular, its geometry, are factors which are in themselves clear in the context of the invention and which apply regardless of the particular structure of the stent. This is also substantially true as regards the basic manufacturing technique (for example, starting from a wire or microtube which is then subjected to an operation for cutting the apertures, for example, using lasers) and/or the material (usually metal) of which the stent is made. All of these factors are dealt with in a fairly large volume of literature and do not require detailed description here.
In essence, the invention provides for the formation of surface sculpturing on the stent 1, at least—and preferably—over a part of, or the whole of the outer surface, indicated 2, and having substantially the aim of:
For clarity, the term “sculpturing” is used to distinguish clearly the surface conformation attributed to the stent according to the invention from the degree of surface (residual) roughness that the surfaces of the stent have in any case, even when they have been previously subjected, according to convention, to a polishing or finishing process.
By way of example, one such treatment confers such a degree of residual roughness on the stent surfaces that the peak-to-trough distances recognisable in a theoretical section of the surface in question at right angles to the surface itself are not, in any case, greater than approximately 2-3 microns.
The degree of surface irregularity, or sculpturing, characteristic of the invention is, instead, such that the peak-to-trough distances found in similar conditions are, typically approximately 10-20 microns, that is, with the possibility of achieving values of an order of magnitude even greater than those of the normal surface finishing of a stent.
In particular,
From this point of view, the solution according to
Conversely, the arrangement shown in
The arrangement according to
The arrangements to which
In any case, objects substantially similar to those described at the beginning of this detailed description of the invention can be achieved by treating the surface 2 in ways intended to confer a generally sculpted appearance thereon.
In relation to this,
Finally,
This technology is well known in the art (for example, for the manufacture of integrated circuits) and does not need to be illustrated in great detail in this context.
Results substantially similar to those illustrated in
As a rule, all of the solutions illustrated in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
TO96A1095 | Dec 1996 | IT | national |
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/691,933, filed Mar. 27, 2007 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,739,781 B2, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/431,557, filed May 7, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,607,208 B2, issued Oct. 27, 2009, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/997,597, filed Dec. 23, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,638,302 B1, issued Oct. 28, 2003, the contents of each of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3526005 | Bokros et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3700380 | Kitrilakis | Oct 1972 | A |
3996355 | Lin et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4219520 | Kline | Aug 1980 | A |
4254180 | Kline | Mar 1981 | A |
4300244 | Bokros | Nov 1981 | A |
4503569 | Dotter | Mar 1985 | A |
4729766 | Bergentz | Mar 1988 | A |
4767418 | Deininger et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4768507 | Fischell et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4776337 | Palmaz | Oct 1988 | A |
4800882 | Gianturco | Jan 1989 | A |
4830003 | Wolff et al. | May 1989 | A |
4856516 | Hillstead | Aug 1989 | A |
4885171 | Surendra et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4886062 | Wiktor | Dec 1989 | A |
4907336 | Gianturco | Mar 1990 | A |
4932964 | Bittmann et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4994033 | Shockey et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5015253 | MacGregor | May 1991 | A |
5023263 | Von Burg | Jun 1991 | A |
5078999 | Warner et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5080899 | Sturm et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5084151 | Vallana et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5133845 | Vallana et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5213580 | Slepian et al. | May 1993 | A |
5286731 | Caufield et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5288711 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5321009 | Baeder et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5356433 | Rowland et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5370684 | Vallana et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5387247 | Vallana et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5423886 | Arru et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5449373 | Pinchasik et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5455100 | White | Oct 1995 | A |
5482945 | Armstrong et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5496832 | Armstrong | Mar 1996 | A |
5508398 | Gletsos | Apr 1996 | A |
5516781 | Morris et al. | May 1996 | A |
5536729 | Waranis et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5561138 | Armstrong | Oct 1996 | A |
5563146 | Morris et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5609629 | Fearnot et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5643580 | Subramaniam | Jul 1997 | A |
5672638 | Verhoeven et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5718973 | Lewis et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5723004 | Dereume et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725567 | Wolff et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728420 | Keogh | Mar 1998 | A |
5733303 | Israel et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735896 | Amon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746272 | Mastrorio et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759192 | Saunders | Jun 1998 | A |
5769884 | Solovay | Jun 1998 | A |
5776943 | Christians et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5788626 | Thompson | Aug 1998 | A |
5800510 | Schmitt | Sep 1998 | A |
5824048 | Tuch | Oct 1998 | A |
5824049 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5836962 | Gianotti | Nov 1998 | A |
5837313 | Ding et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843172 | Yan | Dec 1998 | A |
5846613 | Neuville | Dec 1998 | A |
5848987 | Baudino et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5873725 | Perler et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5972027 | Johnson | Oct 1999 | A |
6015815 | Mollison | Jan 2000 | A |
6071305 | Brown et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6096070 | Ragheb et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6120536 | Ding et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120847 | Yang et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6193747 | von Oepen | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210436 | Weadock | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6253443 | Johnson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6254632 | Wu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273913 | Wright et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6299604 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315794 | Richter | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6342507 | Naicker et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6379381 | Hossainy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387121 | Alt | May 2002 | B1 |
6398806 | You | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6451049 | Vallana et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6506437 | Harish et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6551353 | Baker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6562065 | Shanley | May 2003 | B1 |
6569195 | Yang et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6585764 | Wright et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6699281 | Vallana et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6758859 | Dang et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6764505 | Hossainy et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6774278 | Ragheb et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6783543 | Jang | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6805898 | Wu et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6913617 | Reiss | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7739781 | Curcio et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20010029351 | Falotico et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020038145 | Jang | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020082680 | Shanley et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030028242 | Vallana et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030195613 | Curcio et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040220662 | Dang et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249444 | Reiss | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050209684 | Alexander et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060136051 | Furst et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060224237 | Furst et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241739 | Besselink et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1709210 | Dec 2005 | CN |
102 00 387 | Aug 2003 | DE |
0 274 846 | Jul 1988 | EP |
0 540 290 | May 1993 | EP |
0 551 182 | Jul 1993 | EP |
0 568 310 | Nov 1993 | EP |
0 601 804 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0 603 959 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0 691 130 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0 701 803 | Mar 1996 | EP |
0 712 614 | May 1996 | EP |
0 747 069 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0 806 190 | Nov 1997 | EP |
0 850 604 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0 857 470 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0 875 215 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0 875 218 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0 895 759 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0 895 760 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0 950 386 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1 080 738 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1 088 528 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1 103 234 | May 2001 | EP |
1 181 903 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1 277 449 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 527 754 | May 2005 | EP |
2005-0117361 | Dec 2005 | KR |
WO 9509659 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 9512369 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9603092 | Feb 1996 | WO |
WO 9612450 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9823228 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9834669 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9856312 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9949928 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0012147 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0071054 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0076557 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0117577 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 03039407 | May 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100216376 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11691933 | Mar 2007 | US |
Child | 12775080 | US | |
Parent | 10431557 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 11691933 | US | |
Parent | 08997597 | Dec 1997 | US |
Child | 10431557 | US |