The invention is directed, in general, to integrated circuits (ICs), and more specifically, to the manufacture of ICs requiring the removal of an ion-implanted photoresist.
The manufacture of semiconductor devices often includes forming a photoresist layer on a substrate, and implanting ions through openings in the photoresist layer into the substrate to form doped regions. When the photoresist layer is subject to the ion implantation process, an outer portion of the photoresist is converted into an implant crust.
Typically, a plasma ash process is used to remove the implant crust. Once the implant crust is removed, the bulk of the remaining photoresist layer is often removed by conventional wet etch chemistries. Nevertheless, as increasingly smaller semiconductor devices are manufactured, there has been an increased frequency of defective devices produced by fabrication processes that include removing implanted photoresist layers by a plasma ash process.
Accordingly, what is needed is a method of manufacturing ICs by a method that includes removing an ion-implanted photoresist layers in a manner that permits high device yields.
One embodiment is a method of manufacturing an IC that comprises fabricating a semiconductor device. Fabricating the device includes depositing a photoresist layer on a substrate surface and implanting one or more dopant species through openings in the photoresist layer into the substrate. The dopant species are also implanted into the photoresist layer, thereby forming an implanted photoresist layer. Fabricating the device also includes removing the implanted photoresist layer. Removing the implanted photoresist layer includes exposing the implanted photoresist layer to a mixture that includes sulfuric acid, hydrogen peroxide and ozone. The mixture is at a temperature of at least about 130°.
Another embodiment is a method of manufacturing an IC that comprises fabricating the semiconductor device. Fabricating the device includes forming a gate structure on a substrate, and depositing a photoresist layer on the substrate, including the gate structure. An opening is formed in the photoresist layer so as to expose the gate structure and portions of the substrate in the vicinity of the gate structure. Dopant species are implanted through the openings into the substrate, and, into the photoresist layer, thereby forming an implanted photoresist layer. The implanted photoresist layer is removed by the above-described method.
Still another embodiment is an IC that comprises one or more semiconductor devices. Each device includes a gate structure on a substrate and one or more doped regions formed adjacent to the gate structure. At least one of the doped regions are formed by a process that includes depositing a photoresist layer on the substrate, implanting one or more dopant species through openings in the photoresist layer into the substrate, and into said photoresist layer, thereby forming an implanted photoresist layer, and removing the implanted photoresist layer by the above-described method.
It was discovered that using a wet etchant mixture that includes sulfuric acid, hydrogen peroxide, and ozone, with the mixtures at an elevated temperature (e.g., at least about 130° C.), can efficiently remove an entire ion-implanted photoresist layer in a single step, including its ion-implanted crust. The single-step process disclosed herein eliminates the need for plasma ashing, which in turn, avoids the deposition of particles on the substrate as a byproduct of the plasma ash process.
It is surprising that the disclosed three-component combination of etchants works so well, because conventional wet etchant mixtures could not remove the outer implant crust in a reasonably short period (e.g., about 5 minutes or less). For instance, binary combinations of sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide, or, sulfuric acid and ozone, do not efficiently remove ion-implanted crusts formed when using implantation doses of 1E14 atom/cm2 or higher. Consequently, these binary mixtures have only been used in conjunction with a plasma ash process. Since binary mixtures are not capable of removing the implant crust there is no reason to expect that a ternary mixture would be more effective.
Plasma ash processes, which are performed in a chamber, can cause the undesirable deposition of chamber-wall particles onto the substrate. E.g., quartz particles from quartz chamber walls of a plasma ash tool can be deposited through the openings in the photoresist layer directly onto the substrate. At least for larger device sizes (e.g., 180 nm and higher nodes), the presence of these chamber-wall particles have minimal effects on semiconductor device performance and therefore there has been no motive to try anything else besides the plasma ash process.
However, these particles can detrimentally affect the performance of smaller semiconductor devices. And, the severity of the detrimental effects from the deposited particle increases as the dimensions of the components in semiconductor devices become smaller (e.g., 90 nm and smaller nodes), resulting in lower than desired yields of semiconductor devices.
The detrimental effects associated with deposited particles are exacerbated by the use of even higher ion implantation doses, which is commonly done as part of forming smaller devices. Higher implantation doses can produce thicker ion-implant crusts that are more impermeable and resistant to the conventional wet etchants. Thicker crusts can also require more aggressive plasma ash processes for their removal. Because the semiconductor device's dimensions are smaller, there is increased risk that the plasma ash will inadvertently oxidize substantially portions of the substrate after removing the photoresist.
For small devices, the loss of a substrate thickness of as little as 1 Angstrom can substantially affect the performance characteristics of the device. E.g., the drive current at which a transistor device can operate at can be substantially changed. Moreover, those portions of the substrate not covered by the photoresist will be oxidized by the plasma ash to a greater extent than portions initially covered by the photoresist. This, in turn, can result in a non-uniform substrate surface when the oxidized substrate is removed, which in turn, can make it difficult to accurately define device features on the substrate using photolithographic procedures.
These considerations pointed to the need to find an alternative to plasma ashing and conventional wet etching processes as the industry moves towards producing device with ever-smaller dimensions.
It was recognized as part of this disclosure, that the conventional wet etchants are ineffective because they do not have sufficient oxidizing power (e.g., low concentrations of oxidizing free radicals, such as OH. radicals) to efficiently remove the implant crust. Typically, the photoresist is composed of one or more hydrocarbon-based polymers. The implant crust can be characterized as that portion of the photoresist layer that is depleted of hydrogen content, leaving behind a carbon-rich layer, as compared to the photoresist layer prior to ion implantation.
While not limiting the scope of the disclosure by theory, it is believed that ion-implantation drives lower molecular weight atoms of the photoresist (e.g., hydrogen atoms) to relatively deeper distances into the photoresist layer than high molecular weight atoms (e.g., carbon atoms) are driven. Consequently, the outer portions of the photoresist layer is chemically converted into a carbon-rich implant crust. It is further believed that the presence of relatively higher numbers of carbon-carbon bonds in the carbon-rich crust is what necessitates the use of the above-described three-component etchant mixture with its greater oxidizing power the remove the implant crust.
Some of the example embodiments disclosed herein feature the removal of an ion-implanted photoresist layer on a transistor semiconductor device substrate. However, the disclosed embodiments could be applied at any step in an IC fabrication scheme of other types of devices (e.g., capacitors, resistors) where it is important to remove a photoresist layer that has been ion-implanted.
One aspect of the invention is a method of manufacturing an IC that includes using the above-described three-component etchant mixture and elevated temperature as part of a photoresist removal process.
The implant crust 230 can be formed as an upper portion of photoresist layer 110. The crust 230 can form irrespective of the type of dopant species 210 that the photoresist layer 220 is implanted with. E.g., dopant species 210 can include one or more of: boron, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, fluorine, arsenic, or other well-known species used as dopants in semiconductor devices. The thickness 235 of the implanted crust 230 is a strong function of the dose of the ion implanted. The higher the ion implantation dose, the greater the thickness 235 of the implant crust 230. In some embodiments, the photoresist layer 110 has a total thickness 240 in a range of about 1000 to 5000 nm, and the outer implant crust 230 has a thickness 235 in a range of about 60 to 140 nm.
The thickness 235 of the crust 230 is also a weaker function of the type photoresist used, the ion implantation energy and the type of ion implant species. The higher the implantation dose and implant energy, the greater the degree of carbonization of the crust 230, and, consequently the greater level of oxidation power need to remove the crust 230. Example doses that cause crust formation are about 1E12 atom/cm2 and higher. Example implantation energies that facilitate crust formation are about 10 keV and higher, and in some cases about 50 keV and higher. The implantation of high molecular weight dopant species 210 (e.g., arsenic), or, of high reactivity dopant species 210 (e.g., fluorine is highly reactive with the hydrocarbon polymers of the photoresist) increases the thickness 235 of the crust 230. The implantation dose, energy and type of ion implant species can cooperatively affect the extent of crust 230 formation. E.g., using about the same implantation energies, the implantation of a reactive dopant 210 such as fluorine at a dose of 6E14 atom/cm2 can result in about the same thickness 235 of crust 230 being formed as implanting a less reactive dopant 210 such as boron implanted at 1E15 atom/cm2.
In some preferred embodiments, the mixture's temperature is in a range of about 150 to 200° C. In some embodiments, it is desirable to maintain the temperature of the mixture 310 to be about 250° C. or less, because higher temperatures can promote the rapid loss of ozone from the mixture 310. In other cases, however, if ozone is added to the mixture shortly before it contacts the surface 117 (e.g., less than about 1 minute), higher temperatures can be used.
In some embodiments, the sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide are provided to the mixture as concentrated solutions. For instance, the sulfuric acid can be provides as an about 98 wt % w/w sulfuric acid solution (e.g., about 18 M H2SO4). The hydrogen peroxide can be provided as an about 30 wt % hydrogen peroxide solution (e.g., about 8.8 M H2O2). Other concentrations of sulfuric acid solution and hydrogen peroxide solution could be used, if desired. One skilled in the art would understand that concentrated solutions of sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide also contain balance water as well as trace amounts of other reactants or by-products of the processes used to prepare these compounds.
In some embodiments, the mixture 310 includes about 98 wt % sulfuric acid and about 30 wt % hydrogen peroxide provided in a ratio that ranges from about 65:35 to about 85:15, and that further includes ozone in a range of about 1 to 70 ppm by weight (e.g., about 1 to 50 mg O3 per liter of the mixture). For example, as shown in
To be an effective means of removal, the wet-etch mixture 310 preferably removes the implanted photoresist layer 220 in less than about 5 minutes, and more preferably, less than about 2 to 3 minutes. To rapidly remove the ion-implanted photoresist layer 220, it is important to optimize the oxidizing power of the mixture 310 by presenting it directly to the substrate surface 117, (and photoresist layer 220 thereon) as soon as, or soon after, preparing the mixture 310. The longer the three components of the mixture 310 (sulfuric acid, hydrogen peroxide and ozone) are kept to together, the lower the concentration of reactive oxidative species (e.g., OH. radicals), generated from the three components. Consequently, the mixture 310 becomes less effective at removing the ion-implanted photoresist layer 220. Therefore, in some embodiments, it is advantageous to mix one or all of the components together at the substrate surface 117 (and photoresist layer 220), or, immediately before contacting the substrate surface 117.
In some embodiments, the wet-etch mixture 310 further includes water (e.g., de-ionized water) added within about 1 minute of the mixture 310 contacting the substrate surface 117. The water can be directly mixed with the three component mixture 310 of sulfuric acid, hydrogen peroxide and ozone, or, mixed with one of sulfuric acid or hydrogen peroxide, which are subsequently mixed together. One benefit in adding water to sulfuric acid or a mixture containing sulfuric acid is that a strong exothermic reaction occurs with a resultant large temperature increase. Provided that the mixture 310 with water added to it is not allowed to cool down, adding water can eliminate or reduce the need to have a separate heat source to heat one or all of the components of the mixture, or, the mixture itself. In some cases, however, it is still desirable to externally heat one or more of the components of the mixture 310 before the components are mixed. E.g., in some cases, the sulfuric acid is preheated to about 80° C. before being mixed with the other components of the mixture 310.
Another benefit in including water in the mixture 310 is that ozone can be dissolved in water and delivered to the other components (e.g., sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide) of the mixture 310 with the water. Ozone, however, is highly volatile and is not retained in water for very long. Moreover, ozone's volatility, and therefore escape from the mixture 310, is increased at higher temperatures. Therefore, in some cases, it is beneficial to add the ozone immediately before or while the mixture 310 contacts the implanted photoresist layer 220.
The beneficial features of including water, however, needs to be balanced with the undesirable excessive dilution of the three components of the mixture 310. That is, as more water is added to the mixture 310, the concentrations of sulfuric acid, hydrogen peroxide or ozone are decreased, and therefore, the oxidizing power of the mixture 310 is decreased.
For example, in some embodiments, the mixture 310 includes about 98 wt % sulfuric acid, about 30 wt % hydrogen peroxide, and water, provided in a ratio of that ranges from about 60:20:4 to about 80:30:8 and the mixture 310 further includes ozone in a range of about 1 to 70 ppm by weight. For instance, as shown in
There are a number of different ways of that the mixture 310 can be formulated to facilitate removal of the implanted photoresist 220. As illustrated in
In other cases, such as shown in
In still other cases, such as shown in
In still other cases, such as shown in
Any conventional ozone-generating methods can be used in order to introduce ozone 340 into the mixture 310, binary mixtures 410, 610, or water 365 as a described above in the context of
At least one of the doped regions are formed by a process that includes depositing a photoresist layer 110 (
Those skilled in the art to which the invention relates will appreciate that other and further additions, deletions, substitutions and modifications may be made to the described example embodiments, without departing from the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/981,703, to Srinivasa Raghavan, et al. on Oct. 22, 2007, entitled “SULFURIC ACID, HYDROGEN PEROXIDE AND OZONE MIXTURE (SPOM) FOR STRIPPING OF IMPLANTED PHOTORESIST,” commonly assigned with the invention and incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60981703 | Oct 2007 | US |