The present invention relates generally to processes for producing alcohol and, in particular, to a process for recovering ethanol from an ethyl acetate residue stream.
Ethanol for industrial use is conventionally produced from petrochemical feed stocks, such as oil, natural gas, or coal, from feed stock intermediates, such as syngas, or from starchy materials or cellulose materials, such as corn or sugar cane. Conventional methods for producing ethanol from petrochemical feed stocks, as well as from cellulose materials, include the acid-catalyzed hydration of ethylene, methanol homologation, direct alcohol synthesis, and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Instability in petrochemical feed stock prices contributes to fluctuations in the cost of conventionally produced ethanol, making the need for alternative sources of ethanol production all the greater when feed stock prices rise. Starchy materials, as well as cellulose material, are converted to ethanol by fermentation. However, fermentation is typically used for consumer production of ethanol, which is suitable for fuels or human consumption. In addition, fermentation of starchy or cellulose materials competes with food sources and places restraints on the amount of ethanol that can be produced for industrial use.
Ethanol production via the reduction of alkanoic acids and/or other carbonyl group-containing compounds has been widely studied, and a variety of combinations of catalysts, supports, and operating conditions have been mentioned in the literature. During the reduction of alkanoic acids, e.g., acetic acid, other compounds are formed with ethanol or are formed in side reactions. These impurities limit the production and recovery of ethanol from such reaction mixtures. For example, during hydrogenation, esters are produced that together with ethanol and/or water form azeotropes, which are difficult to separate. In addition, when conversion is incomplete, acid remains in the crude ethanol product, which must be removed to recover ethanol.
EP02060553 describes a process for converting hydrocarbons to ethanol involving converting the hydrocarbons to ethanoic acid and hydrogenating the ethanoic acid to ethanol. The stream from the hydrogenation reactor is separated to obtain an ethanol stream and a stream of acetic acid and ethyl acetate, which is recycled to the hydrogenation reactor.
The need remains for improved processes for recovering ethanol from a crude product obtained by reducing alkanoic acids, such as acetic acid, and/or other carbonyl group-containing compounds.
In a first embodiment, the present invention is directed to a process for producing ethanol comprising hydrogenating acetic acid and/or an ester thereof in a reactor in the presence of a catalyst to form a crude ethanol product; separating a portion of the crude ethanol product in a first distillation column to yield a first distillate comprising acetaldehyde and a first residue comprising ethanol, acetic acid, ethyl acetate and water; separating a portion of the first residue in a second distillation column to yield a second residue comprising acetic acid and water and a second distillate comprising ethanol, and ethyl acetate; and separating at least a portion of the second distillate to yield a third distillate comprising ethyl acetate and a third residue comprising ethanol.
In a second embodiment, the present invention is directed to a process for producing ethanol comprising providing a crude ethanol product stream comprising ethanol, acetic acid, ethyl acetate, acetaldehyde, and water, separating a portion of the crude ethanol product in a first distillation column to yield a first distillate comprising acetaldehyde and a first residue comprising ethanol, acetic acid, ethyl acetate and water, separating a portion of the first residue in a second distillation column to yield a second residue comprising acetic acid and water and a second distillate comprising ethanol and ethyl acetate, and separating at least a portion of the second distillate to yield a third distillate comprising ethyl acetate and a third residue comprising ethanol.
In a third embodiment, the present invention is directed to a process for producing ethanol comprising providing a crude ethanol product stream comprising ethanol, ethyl acetate, acetaldehyde, and water; separating at least a portion of the crude ethanol product stream in a first distillation column to form a first distillate comprising acetaldehyde and a first residue comprising ethanol, ethyl acetate and water; separating at least a portion of the first residue to form an organic stream comprising ethyl acetate and ethanol and an aqueous stream comprising water; and separating the organic stream in a second distillation column to form a second distillate comprising ethyl acetate and a second residue comprising ethanol.
In a fourth embodiment, the present invention is directed to a process for producing ethanol comprising hydrogenating acetic acid and/or an ester thereof in a reactor in the presence of a catalyst to form a crude ethanol product stream; separating a portion of the crude ethanol product in a first distillation column to yield a first distillate comprising acetaldehyde and a first residue comprising ethanol, acetic acid, ethyl acetate and water; separating a portion of the first residue in a second distillation column to yield a second residue comprising acetic acid and a second distillate comprising ethanol, ethyl acetate and water; removing water from at least a portion of the second distillate to yield an ethanol product stream having a lower water content than the at least a portion of the second distillate; and separating at least a portion of the ethanol product stream in a third distillation column to yield a third distillate comprising ethyl acetate and a third residue comprising ethanol and less than 3 wt. % water.
In a fifth embodiment, the present invention is directed to a process for producing ethanol comprising hydrogenating acetic acid and/or an ester thereof in a reactor in the presence of a catalyst to form a crude ethanol product; separating a portion of the crude ethanol product in a first distillation column to yield a first distillate comprising acetaldehyde and a first residue comprising ethanol, acetic acid, ethyl acetate and water; separating a portion of the first residue in a second distillation column to yield a second residue comprising acetic acid and water and a second distillate comprising ethanol, and ethyl acetate; separating at least a portion of the second distillate to yield a third distillate comprising ethyl acetate and a third residue comprising ethanol; and returning at least a portion of the third distillate to the first distillation column.
In a sixth embodiment, the present invention is directed to a process for producing ethanol comprising hydrogenating acetic acid and/or an ester thereof in a reactor in the presence of a catalyst to form a crude ethanol product; separating a portion of the crude ethanol product in a first distillation column to yield a first distillate comprising acetaldehyde and a first residue comprising ethanol, acetic acid and/or ethyl acetate; separating a portion of the first residue in a second distillation column to yield a second residue comprising high boiling point components and a second distillate comprising ethanol and ethyl acetate; and separating at least a portion of the second distillate to yield a third distillate comprising ethyl acetate and a third residue comprising ethanol.
The invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein like numerals designate similar parts.
The present invention relates to processes for recovering ethanol produced by hydrogenating acetic acid in the presence of a catalyst. The hydrogenation reaction produces a crude ethanol product that comprises ethanol, water, ethyl acetate, acetaldehyde, acetic acid, and other impurities. The processes of the present invention involve separating the crude ethanol product in a first column into a residue stream comprising ethanol, water, ethyl acetate and acetic acid and a distillate stream comprising acetaldehyde. The first column primarily removes light organics in the distillate and returns those organics for subsequent hydrogenation. Subsequently, the ethanol is removed from the residue stream to yield an ethanol product. Advantageously, this separation approach results in reducing energy requirements to recover ethanol from the crude ethanol product.
In recovering ethanol, the processes of the present invention use one or more distillation columns. In preferred embodiments, the residue stream comprises a substantial portion of the ethanol, ethyl acetate, water and acetic acid from the crude ethanol product. The residue stream, for example, may comprise at least 50% of the ethanol from the crude ethanol product, and more preferably at least 70%. In terms of ranges, the residue stream may comprise from 50% to 97.5% of the ethanol from the crude ethanol product, and more preferably from 70% to 97.5%. The amount of ethanol from the crude ethanol recovered in the residue may be greater than 97.5%, e.g. up to 99.9%. In some embodiments, depending on the ethyl acetate concentration, taking too much ethanol in the residue may cause leakage of ethyl acetate in the residue. Rather than operate the column to reduce ethyl acetate concentration in the residue, the present invention allows for some ethyl acetate to be withdrawn in the residue. In one embodiment, the residue may comprise at least 50 wppm ethyl acetate. Due to the in-situ esterification of acetic acid and ethanol in the residue, additional ethyl acetate may be formed and thus an ethyl acetate removal may be necessary to produce an on-spec ethanol product. Thus, the ethyl acetate, including the in-situ formed ethyl acetate, when present in amounts of at least 50 wppm, may be subsequently further separated from ethanol.
In preferred embodiments, the residue stream comprises a substantial portion of the water and the acetic acid from the crude ethanol product. The residue stream may comprise at least 80% of the water from the crude ethanol product, and more preferably at least 90%. In terms of ranges, the residue stream preferably comprises from 80% to 100% of the water from the crude ethanol product, and more preferably from 90% to 99.4%. The residue stream may comprise at least 85% of the acetic acid from the crude ethanol product, e.g., at least 90% and more preferably about 100%. In terms of ranges, the residue stream preferably comprises from 85% to 100% of the acetic acid from the crude ethanol product, and more preferably from 90% to 100%. In one embodiment, substantially all of the acetic acid is recovered in the residue stream. In addition to the substantial portion of acetic acid and water, ethyl acetate may also be present in the residue stream.
The residue stream comprising ethanol, ethyl acetate, water, and acetic acid may be further separated to recover ethanol. Because these compounds may not be in equilibrium, additional ethyl acetate may be produced through esterification of ethanol and acetic acid. In one preferred embodiment, the water and acetic acid may be removed as another residue stream in a separate distillation column.
In an exemplary embodiment, the energy requirements by the initial column in the process according to the present invention may be less than 5.5 MMBtu per ton of refined ethanol, e.g., less than 4.5 MMBtu per ton of refined ethanol or less than 3.5 MMBtu per ton of refined ethanol.
The distillate from the initial column comprises light organics, such as acetaldehyde. Other light organics may include diethyl acetal, acetone, and ethyl acetate. In addition, minor amounts of ethanol and water may be present in the distillate. Removing this component from the crude ethanol product in the initial column provides an efficient means for removing acetaldehyde. In addition, acetaldehyde, diethyl acetal, and acetone are not carried over with the ethanol when multiple columns are used, thus reducing the formation of byproducts from acetaldehyde, diethyl acetal, and acetone. In particular, acetaldehyde and/or ethyl acetate may be returned to the reactor, and converted to additional ethanol. In another embodiment, a purge may remove these light organics from the system.
The residue from the initial column comprises ethyl acetate. Although ethyl acetate is also partially withdrawn into the first distillate, a higher ethyl acetate concentration in the first residue leads to increased ethanol concentration in the first residue and decrease ethanol concentrations in the first distillate. Thus overall ethanol recovery may be increased. Ethyl acetate may be separated from ethanol in a separate column near the end of the purification process. In removing ethyl acetate, additional light organics may also be removed and thus improve the quality of the ethanol product by decreasing impurities. Preferably, water and/or acetic acid may be removed prior to the ethyl acetate/ethanol separation.
In one embodiment, after the ethyl acetate is separated from ethanol, the ethyl acetate is returned to the initial column and fed near the top of that column. This allows for any ethanol removed with the ethyl acetate to be recovered and further reduces the amount of ethanol being recycled to the reactor. Decreasing the ethanol recycle to the reactor may reduce reactor capital and improve efficiency in recovering ethanol. Preferably, the ethyl acetate is removed in the distillate of the first column and returned to the reactor with the acetaldehyde.
The process of the present invention may be used with any hydrogenation process for producing ethanol. The materials, catalysts, reaction conditions, and separation processes that may be used in the hydrogenation of acetic acid are described further below.
The raw materials, acetic acid and hydrogen, used in connection with the process of this invention may be derived from any suitable source including natural gas, petroleum, coal, biomass, and so forth. As examples, acetic acid may be produced via methanol carbonylation, acetaldehyde oxidation, ethylene oxidation, oxidative fermentation, and anaerobic fermentation. Methanol carbonylation processes suitable for production of acetic acid are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,208,624; 7,115,772; 7,005,541; 6,657,078; 6,627,770; 6,143,930; 5,599,976; 5,144,068; 5,026,908; 5,001,259; and 4,994,608, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Optionally, the production of ethanol may be integrated with such methanol carbonylation processes.
As petroleum and natural gas prices fluctuate becoming either more or less expensive, methods for producing acetic acid and intermediates such as methanol and carbon monoxide from alternate carbon sources have drawn increasing interest. In particular, when petroleum is relatively expensive, it may become advantageous to produce acetic acid from synthesis gas (“syngas”) that is derived from other available carbon source. U.S. Pat. No. 6,232,352, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference, for example, teaches a method of retrofitting a methanol plant for the manufacture of acetic acid. By retrofitting a methanol plant, the large capital costs associated with CO generation for a new acetic acid plant are significantly reduced or largely eliminated. All or part of the syngas is diverted from the methanol synthesis loop and supplied to a separator unit to recover CO, which is then used to produce acetic acid. In a similar manner, hydrogen for the hydrogenation step may be supplied from syngas.
In some embodiments, some or all of the raw materials for the above-described acetic acid hydrogenation process may be derived partially or entirely from syngas. For example, the acetic acid may be formed from methanol and carbon monoxide, both of which may be derived from syngas. The syngas may be formed by partial oxidation reforming or steam reforming, and the carbon monoxide may be separated from syngas. Similarly, hydrogen that is used in the step of hydrogenating the acetic acid to form the crude ethanol product may be separated from syngas. The syngas, in turn, may be derived from variety of carbon sources. The carbon source, for example, may be selected from the group consisting of natural gas, oil, petroleum, coal, biomass, and combinations thereof. Syngas or hydrogen may also be obtained from bio-derived methane gas, such as bio-derived methane gas produced by landfills or agricultural waste.
In another embodiment, the acetic acid used in the hydrogenation step may be formed from the fermentation of biomass. The fermentation process preferably utilizes an acetogenic process or a homoacetogenic microorganism to ferment sugars to acetic acid producing little, if any, carbon dioxide as a by-product. The carbon efficiency for the fermentation process preferably is greater than 70%, greater than 80% or greater than 90% as compared to conventional yeast processing, which typically has a carbon efficiency of about 67%. Optionally, the microorganism employed in the fermentation process is of a genus selected from the group consisting of Clostridium, Lactobacillus, Moorella, Thermoanaerobacter, Propionibacterium, Propionispera, Anaerobiospirillum, and Bacteriodes, and in particular, species selected from the group consisting of Clostridium formicoaceticum, Clostridium butyricum, Moorella thermoacetica, Thermoanaerobacter kivui, Lactobacillus delbrukii, Propionibacterium acidipropionici, Propionispera arboris, Anaerobiospirillum succinicproducens, Bacteriodes amylophilus and Bacteriodes ruminicola. Optionally in this process, all or a portion of the unfermented residue from the biomass, e.g., lignans, may be gasified to form hydrogen that may be used in the hydrogenation step of the present invention. Exemplary fermentation processes for forming acetic acid are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,509,180; 6,927,048; 7,074,603; 7,507,562; 7,351,559; 7,601,865; 7,682,812; and 7,888,082, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference. See also US Publ. Nos. 2008/0193989 and 2009/0281354, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Examples of biomass include, but are not limited to, agricultural wastes, forest products, grasses, and other cellulosic material, timber harvesting residues, softwood chips, hardwood chips, tree branches, tree stumps, leaves, bark, sawdust, off-spec paper pulp, corn, corn stover, wheat straw, rice straw, sugarcane bagasse, switchgrass, miscanthus, animal manure, municipal garbage, municipal sewage, commercial waste, grape pumice, almond shells, pecan shells, coconut shells, coffee grounds, grass pellets, hay pellets, wood pellets, cardboard, paper, plastic, and cloth. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 7,884,253, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. Another biomass source is black liquor, a thick, dark liquid that is a byproduct of the Kraft process for transforming wood into pulp, which is then dried to make paper. Black liquor is an aqueous solution of lignin residues, hemicellulose, and inorganic chemicals.
U.S. Pat. No. RE 35,377, also incorporated herein by reference, provides a method for the production of methanol by converting carbonaceous materials such as oil, coal, natural gas and biomass materials. The process includes hydrogasification of solid and/or liquid carbonaceous materials to obtain a process gas which is steam pyrolized with additional natural gas to form synthesis gas. The syngas is converted to methanol which may be carbonylated to acetic acid. The method likewise produces hydrogen which may be used in connection with this invention as noted above. U.S. Pat. No. 5,821,111, which discloses a process for converting waste biomass through gasification into synthesis gas, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,685,754, which discloses a method for the production of a hydrogen-containing gas composition, such as a synthesis gas including hydrogen and carbon monoxide, are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
The acetic acid fed to the hydrogenation reaction may also comprise other carboxylic acids and anhydrides, as well as acetaldehyde and acetone. Preferably, a suitable acetic acid feed stream comprises one or more of the compounds selected from the group consisting of acetic acid, acetic anhydride, acetaldehyde, ethyl acetate, and mixtures thereof. These other compounds may also be hydrogenated in the processes of the present invention. In some embodiments, the presence of carboxylic acids, such as propanoic acid or its anhydride, may be beneficial in producing propanol. Water may also be present in the acetic acid feed.
Alternatively, acetic acid in vapor form may be taken directly as crude product from the flash vessel of a methanol carbonylation unit of the class described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,657,078, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. The crude vapor product, for example, may be fed directly to the ethanol synthesis reaction zones of the present invention without the need for condensing the acetic acid and light ends or removing water, saving overall processing costs.
The acetic acid may be vaporized at the reaction temperature, following which the vaporized acetic acid may be fed along with hydrogen in an undiluted state or diluted with a relatively inert carrier gas, such as nitrogen, argon, helium, carbon dioxide and the like. For reactions run in the vapor phase, the temperature should be controlled in the system such that it does not fall below the dew point of acetic acid. In one embodiment, the acetic acid may be vaporized at the boiling point of acetic acid at the particular pressure, and then the vaporized acetic acid may be further heated to the reactor inlet temperature. In another embodiment, the acetic acid is mixed with other gases before vaporizing, followed by heating the mixed vapors up to the reactor inlet temperature. Preferably, the acetic acid is transferred to the vapor state by passing hydrogen and/or recycle gas through the acetic acid at a temperature at or below 125° C., followed by heating of the combined gaseous stream to the reactor inlet temperature.
Some embodiments of the process of hydrogenating acetic acid to form ethanol may include a variety of configurations using a fixed bed reactor or a fluidized bed reactor. In many embodiments of the present invention, an “adiabatic” reactor can be used; that is, there is little or no need for internal plumbing through the reaction zone to add or remove heat. In other embodiments, a radial flow reactor or reactors may be employed, or a series of reactors may be employed with or without heat exchange, quenching, or introduction of additional feed material. Alternatively, a shell and tube reactor provided with a heat transfer medium may be used. In many cases, the reaction zone may be housed in a single vessel or in a series of vessels with heat exchangers therebetween.
In preferred embodiments, the catalyst is employed in a fixed bed reactor, e.g., in the shape of a pipe or tube, where the reactants, typically in the vapor form, are passed over or through the catalyst. Other reactors, such as fluid or ebullient bed reactors, can be employed. In some instances, the hydrogenation catalysts may be used in conjunction with an inert material to regulate the pressure drop of the reactant stream through the catalyst bed and the contact time of the reactant compounds with the catalyst particles.
The hydrogenation reaction may be carried out in either the liquid phase or vapor phase. Preferably, the reaction is carried out in the vapor phase under the following conditions. The reaction temperature may range from 125° C. to 350° C., e.g., from 200° C. to 325° C., from 225° C. to 300° C., or from 250° C. to 300° C. The pressure may range from 10 kPa to 3000 kPa, e.g., from 50 kPa to 2300 kPa, or from 100 kPa to 1500 kPa. The reactants may be fed to the reactor at a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of greater than 500 hr−1, e.g., greater than 1000 hr−1, greater than 2500 hr−1 or even greater than 5000 hr−1. In terms of ranges the GHSV may range from 50 hr−1 to 50,000 hr−1, e.g., from 500 hr−1 to 30,000 hr−1, from 1000 hr−1 to 10,000 hr−1, or from 1000 hr−1 to 6500 hr−1.
The hydrogenation optionally is carried out at a pressure just sufficient to overcome the pressure drop across the catalytic bed at the GHSV selected, although there is no bar to the use of higher pressures, it being understood that considerable pressure drop through the reactor bed may be experienced at high space velocities, e.g., 5000 hr−1 or 6,500 hr−1.
Although the reaction consumes two moles of hydrogen per mole of acetic acid to produce one mole of ethanol, the actual molar ratio of hydrogen to acetic acid in the feed stream may vary from about 100:1 to 1:100, e.g., from 50:1 to 1:50, from 20:1 to 1:2, or from 12:1 to 1:1. Most preferably, the molar ratio of hydrogen to acetic acid is greater than 2:1, e.g., greater than 4:1 or greater than 8:1.
Contact or residence time can also vary widely, depending upon such variables as amount of acetic acid, catalyst, reactor, temperature, and pressure. Typical contact times range from a fraction of a second to more than several hours when a catalyst system other than a fixed bed is used, with preferred contact times, at least for vapor phase reactions, of from 0.1 to 100 seconds, e.g., from 0.3 to 80 seconds or from 0.4 to 30 seconds.
The hydrogenation of acetic acid to form ethanol is preferably conducted in the presence of a hydrogenation catalyst. Suitable hydrogenation catalysts include catalysts comprising a first metal and optionally one or more of a second metal, a third metal or any number of additional metals, optionally on a catalyst support. The first and optional second and third metals may be selected from Group IB, IIB, IIIB, IVB, VB, VIB, VIIB, VIII transition metals, a lanthanide metal, an actinide metal or a metal selected from any of Groups IIIA, IVA, VA, and VIA. Preferred metal combinations for some exemplary catalyst compositions include platinum/tin, platinum/ruthenium, platinum/rhenium, palladium/ruthenium, palladium/rhenium, cobalt/palladium, cobalt/platinum, cobalt/chromium, cobalt/ruthenium, cobalt/tin, silver/palladium, copper/palladium, copper/zinc, nickel/palladium, gold/palladium, ruthenium/rhenium, and ruthenium/iron. Exemplary catalysts are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,608,744 and U.S. Pub. No. 2010/0029995, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference. In another embodiment, the catalyst comprises a Co/Mo/S catalyst of the type described in U.S. Pub. No. 2009/0069609, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In one embodiment, the catalyst comprises a first metal selected from the group consisting of copper, iron, cobalt, nickel, ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, osmium, iridium, platinum, titanium, zinc, chromium, rhenium, molybdenum, and tungsten. Preferably, the first metal is selected from the group consisting of platinum, palladium, cobalt, nickel, and ruthenium. More preferably, the first metal is selected from platinum and palladium. In embodiments of the invention where the first metal comprises platinum, it is preferred that the catalyst comprises platinum in an amount less than 5 wt. %, e.g., less than 3 wt. % or less than 1 wt. %, due to the high commercial demand for platinum.
As indicated above, in some embodiments, the catalyst further comprises a second metal, which typically would function as a promoter. If present, the second metal preferably is selected from the group consisting of copper, molybdenum, tin, chromium, iron, cobalt, vanadium, tungsten, palladium, platinum, lanthanum, cerium, manganese, ruthenium, rhenium, gold, and nickel. More preferably, the second metal is selected from the group consisting of copper, tin, cobalt, rhenium, and nickel. More preferably, the second metal is selected from tin and rhenium.
In certain embodiments where the catalyst includes two or more metals, e.g., a first metal and a second metal, the first metal is present in the catalyst in an amount from 0.1 to 10 wt. %, e.g., from 0.1 to 5 wt. %, or from 0.1 to 3 wt. %. The second metal preferably is present in an amount from 0.1 to 20 wt. %, e.g., from 0.1 to 10 wt. %, or from 0.1 to 5 wt. %. For catalysts comprising two or more metals, the two or more metals may be alloyed with one another or may comprise a non-alloyed metal solution or mixture.
The preferred metal ratios may vary depending on the metals used in the catalyst. In some exemplary embodiments, the mole ratio of the first metal to the second metal is from 10:1 to 1:10, e.g., from 4:1 to 1:4, from 2:1 to 1:2, from 1.5:1 to 1:1.5 or from 1.1:1 to 1:1.1.
The catalyst may also comprise a third metal selected from any of the metals listed above in connection with the first or second metal, so long as the third metal is different from the first and second metals. In preferred aspects, the third metal is selected from the group consisting of cobalt, palladium, ruthenium, copper, zinc, platinum, tin, and rhenium. More preferably, the third metal is selected from cobalt, palladium, and ruthenium. When present, the total weight of the third metal preferably is from 0.05 to 4 wt. %, e.g., from 0.1 to 3 wt. %, or from 0.1 to 2 wt. %.
In addition to one or more metals, in some embodiments of the present invention the catalysts further comprise a support or a modified support. As used herein, the term “modified support” refers to a support that includes a support material and a support modifier, which adjusts the acidity of the support material.
The total weight of the support or modified support, based on the total weight of the catalyst, preferably is from 75 to 99.9 wt. %, e.g., from 78 to 97 wt. %, or from 80 to 95 wt. %. In preferred embodiments that utilize a modified support, the support modifier is present in an amount from 0.1 to 50 wt. %, e.g., from 0.2 to 25 wt. %, from 0.5 to 15 wt. %, or from 1 to 8 wt. %, based on the total weight of the catalyst. The metals of the catalysts may be dispersed throughout the support, layered throughout the support, coated on the outer surface of the support (i.e., egg shell), or decorated on the surface of the support.
As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, support materials are selected such that the catalyst system is suitably active, selective and robust under the process conditions employed for the formation of ethanol.
Suitable support materials may include, for example, stable metal oxide-based supports or ceramic-based supports. Preferred supports include silicaceous supports, such as silica, silica/alumina, a Group IIA silicate such as calcium metasilicate, pyrogenic silica, high purity silica, and mixtures thereof. Other supports may include, but are not limited to, iron oxide, alumina, titania, zirconia, magnesium oxide, carbon, graphite, high surface area graphitized carbon, activated carbons, and mixtures thereof.
As indicated, the catalyst support may be modified with a support modifier. In some embodiments, the support modifier may be an acidic modifier that increases the acidity of the catalyst. Suitable acidic support modifiers may be selected from the group consisting of: oxides of Group IVB metals, oxides of Group VB metals, oxides of Group VIB metals, oxides of Group VIIB metals, oxides of Group VIIIB metals, aluminum oxides, and mixtures thereof. Acidic support modifiers include those selected from the group consisting of TiO2, ZrO2, Nb2O5, Ta2O5, Al2O3, B2O3, P2O5, and Sb2O3. Preferred acidic support modifiers include those selected from the group consisting of TiO2, ZrO2, Nb2O5, Ta2O5, and Al2O3. The acidic modifier may also include selected from the group consisting of WO3, MoO3, Fe2O3, Cr2O3, V2O5, MnO2, CuO, Co2O3, and Bi2O3.
In another embodiment, the support modifier may be a basic modifier that has a low volatility or no volatility. Such basic modifiers, for example, may be selected from the group consisting of: (i) alkaline earth metal oxides, (ii) alkali metal oxides, (iii) alkaline earth metal metasilicates, (iv) alkali metal metasilicates, (v) Group IIB metal oxides, (vi) Group IIB metal metasilicates, (vii) Group IIIB metal oxides, (viii) Group IIIB metal metasilicates, and mixtures thereof. In addition to oxides and metasilicates, other types of modifiers including nitrates, nitrites, acetates, and lactates may be used. Preferably, the support modifier is selected from the group consisting of oxides and metasilicates of any of sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, scandium, yttrium, and zinc, as well as mixtures of any of the foregoing. More preferably, the basic support modifier is a calcium silicate, and even more preferably calcium metasilicate (CaSiO3). If the basic support modifier comprises calcium metasilicate, it is preferred that at least a portion of the calcium metasilicate is in crystalline form.
A preferred silica support material is SS61138 High Surface Area (HSA) Silica Catalyst Carrier from Saint Gobain NorPro. The Saint-Gobain NorPro SS61138 silica exhibits the following properties: contains approximately 95 wt. % high surface area silica; surface area of about 250 m2/g; median pore diameter of about 12 nm; average pore volume of about 1.0 cm3/g as measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry and a packing density of about 0.352 g/cm3 (22 lb/ft3).
A preferred silica/alumina support material is KA-160 silica spheres from Sud Chemie having a nominal diameter of about 5 mm, a density of about 0.562 g/ml, an absorptivity of about 0.583 g H2O/g support, a surface area of about 160 to 175 m2/g, and a pore volume of about 0.68 ml/g.
The catalyst compositions suitable for use with the present invention preferably are formed through metal impregnation of the modified support, although other processes such as chemical vapor deposition may also be employed. Such impregnation techniques are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,608,744 and 7,863,489 and U.S. Pub. No. 2010/0197485 referred to above, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In particular, the hydrogenation of acetic acid may achieve favorable conversion of acetic acid and favorable selectivity and productivity to ethanol. For purposes of the present invention, the term “conversion” refers to the amount of acetic acid in the feed that is converted to a compound other than acetic acid. Conversion is expressed as a mole percentage based on acetic acid in the feed. The conversion may be at least 10%, e.g., at least 20%, at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70% or at least 80%. Although catalysts that have high conversions are desirable, such as at least 80% or at least 90%, in some embodiments a low conversion may be acceptable at high selectivity for ethanol. It is, of course, well understood that in many cases, it is possible to compensate for conversion by appropriate recycle streams or use of larger reactors, but it is more difficult to compensate for poor selectivity.
Selectivity is expressed as a mole percent based on converted acetic acid. It should be understood that each compound converted from acetic acid has an independent selectivity and that selectivity is independent from conversion. For example, if 60 mole % of the converted acetic acid is converted to ethanol, we refer to the ethanol selectivity as 60%. Preferably, the catalyst selectivity to ethoxylates is at least 60%, e.g., at least 70%, or at least 80%. As used herein, the term “ethoxylates” refers specifically to the compounds ethanol, acetaldehyde, and ethyl acetate. Preferably, the selectivity to ethanol is at least 80%, e.g., at least 85% or at least 88%. Preferred embodiments of the hydrogenation process also have low selectivity to undesirable products, such as methane, ethane, and carbon dioxide. The selectivity to these undesirable products preferably is less than 4%, e.g., less than 2% or less than 1%. More preferably, these undesirable products are present in undetectable amounts. Formation of alkanes may be low, and ideally less than 2%, less than 1%, or less than 0.5% of the acetic acid passed over the catalyst is converted to alkanes, which have little value other than as fuel.
The term “productivity,” as used herein, refers to the grams of a specified product, e.g., ethanol, formed during the hydrogenation based on the kilograms of catalyst used per hour. A productivity of at least 100 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour, e.g., at least 400 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour or at least 600 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour, is preferred. In terms of ranges, the productivity preferably is from 100 to 3,000 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour, e.g., from 400 to 2,500 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour or from 600 to 2,000 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour.
Operating under the conditions of the present invention may result in ethanol production on the order of at least 0.1 tons of ethanol per hour, e.g., at least 1 ton of ethanol per hour, at least 5 tons of ethanol per hour, or at least 10 tons of ethanol per hour. Larger scale industrial production of ethanol, depending on the scale, generally should be at least 1 ton of ethanol per hour, e.g., at least 15 tons of ethanol per hour or at least 30 tons of ethanol per hour. In terms of ranges, for large scale industrial production of ethanol, the process of the present invention may produce from 0.1 to 160 tons of ethanol per hour, e.g., from 15 to 160 tons of ethanol per hour or from 30 to 80 tons of ethanol per hour. Ethanol production from fermentation, due the economies of scale, typically does not permit the single facility ethanol production that may be achievable by employing embodiments of the present invention.
In various embodiments of the present invention, the crude ethanol product produced by the hydrogenation process, before any subsequent processing, such as purification and separation, will typically comprise acetic acid, ethanol and water. Exemplary compositional ranges for the crude ethanol product are provided in Table 1. The “others” identified in Table 1 may include, for example, esters, ethers, aldehydes, ketones, alkanes, and carbon dioxide.
In one embodiment, the crude ethanol product comprises acetic acid in an amount less than 20 wt. %, e.g., less than 15 wt. %, less than 10 wt. % or less than 5 wt. %. In terms of ranges, the acetic acid concentration of Table 1 may range from 0.1 wt. % to 20 wt. %, e.g., 0.2 wt. % to 15 wt. %, from 0.5 wt. % to 10 wt. % or from 1 wt. % to 5 wt. %. In embodiments having lower amounts of acetic acid, the conversion of acetic acid is preferably greater than 75%, e.g., greater than 85% or greater than 90%. In addition, the selectivity to ethanol may also be preferably high, and is preferably greater than 75%, e.g., greater than 85% or greater than 90%.
Exemplary ethanol recovery systems in accordance with embodiments of the present invention are shown in
As shown in
Hydrogen and acetic acid are fed to a vaporizer 109 via lines 104 and 105, respectively, to create a vapor feed stream in line 110 that is directed to reactor 103. In one embodiment, lines 104 and 105 may be combined and jointly fed to the vaporizer 109. The temperature of the vapor feed stream in line 110 is preferably from 100° C. to 350° C., e.g., from 120° C. to 310° C. or from 150° C. to 300° C. Any feed that is not vaporized is removed from vaporizer 109, and may be recycled or discarded. In addition, although line 110 is shown as being directed to the top of reactor 103, line 110 may be directed to the side, upper portion, or bottom of reactor 103. Further modifications and additional components to reaction zone 101 and separation zone 102 are described below.
Reactor 103 contains the catalyst that is used in the hydrogenation of the carboxylic acid, preferably acetic acid. In one embodiment, one or more guard beds (not shown) may be used upstream of the reactor, optionally upstream of vaporizer 109, to protect the catalyst from poisons or undesirable impurities contained in the feed or return/recycle streams. Such guard beds may be employed in the vapor or liquid streams. Suitable guard bed materials may include, for example, carbon, silica, alumina, ceramic, or resins. In one aspect, the guard bed media is functionalized, e.g., silver functionalized, to trap particular species such as sulfur or halogens. During the hydrogenation process, a crude ethanol product stream is withdrawn, preferably continuously, from reactor 103 via line 111.
The crude ethanol product stream may be condensed and fed to a separator 106, which, in turn, forms a vapor stream 112 and a liquid stream 113. In some embodiments, separator 106 may comprise a flasher or a knockout pot. The separator 106 may operate at a temperature of from 20° C. to 250° C., e.g., from 30° C. to 225° C. or from 60° C. to 200° C. The pressure of separator 106 may be from 50 kPa to 2000 kPa, e.g., from 75 kPa to 1500 kPa or from 100 kPa to 1000 kPa. Optionally, the crude ethanol product in line 111 may pass through one or more membranes to separate hydrogen and/or other non-condensable gases.
The vapor stream 112 exiting separator 106 may comprise hydrogen and hydrocarbons, and may be purged and/or returned to reaction zone 101. As shown, vapor stream 112 is combined with the hydrogen feed 104 and co-fed to vaporizer 109. In some embodiments, the returned vapor stream 112 may be compressed before being combined with hydrogen feed 104.
The liquid stream 113 from separator 106 is withdrawn and directed as a feed composition to the side of first distillation column 107, also referred to as an “acetaldehyde removal column.” In one embodiment, the contents of liquid stream 113 are substantially similar to the crude ethanol product obtained from the reactor, except that the composition has been depleted of hydrogen, carbon dioxide, methane or ethane, which have been removed by separator 106. Accordingly, liquid stream 113 may also be referred to as a crude ethanol product. Exemplary components of liquid stream 113 are provided in Table 2. It should be understood that liquid stream 113 may contain other components, not listed in Table 2.
The amounts indicated as less than (<) in the tables throughout present specification are preferably not present and if present may be present in trace amounts or in amounts greater than 0.0001 wt. %.
The “other esters” in Table 2 may include, but are not limited to, ethyl propionate, methyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, n-propyl acetate, n-butyl acetate or mixtures thereof. The “other ethers” in Table 2 may include, but are not limited to, diethyl ether, methyl ethyl ether, isobutyl ethyl ether or mixtures thereof. The “other alcohols” in Table 2 may include, but are not limited to, methanol, isopropanol, n-propanol, n-butanol or mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, liquid stream 113 may comprise propanol, e.g., isopropanol and/or n-propanol, in an amount from 0.001 to 0.1 wt. %, from 0.001 to 0.05 wt. % or from 0.001 to 0.03 wt. %. In should be understood that these other components may be carried through in any of the distillate or residue streams described herein and will not be further described herein, unless indicated otherwise.
Optionally, crude ethanol product in line 111 or in liquid stream 113 may be further fed to an esterification reactor, hydrogenolysis reactor, or combination thereof. An esterification reactor may be used to consume acetic acid present in the crude ethanol product to further reduce the amount of acetic acid to be removed. Hydrogenolysis may be used to convert ethyl acetate in the crude ethanol product to ethanol.
In the embodiment shown in
When column 107 is operated under about 170 kPa, the temperature of the residue exiting in line 114 preferably is from 70° C. to 155° C., e.g., from 90° C. to 130° C. or from 100° C. to 110° C. The base of column 107 may be maintained at a relatively low temperature by withdrawing a residue stream comprising ethanol, ethyl acetate, water, and acetic acid, thereby providing an energy efficiency advantage. The temperature of the distillate exiting in line 115 from column 107 preferably at 170 kPa is from 75° C. to 100° C., e.g., from 75° C. to 83° C. or from 81° C. to 84° C. In some embodiments, the pressure of first column 107 may range from 0.1 kPa to 510 kPa, e.g., from 1 kPa to 475 kPa or from 1 kPa to 375 kPa. Exemplary components of the distillate and residue compositions for first column 107 are provided in Table 3 below. It should also be understood that the distillate and residue may also contain other components, not listed in Table 3. For convenience, the distillate and residue of the first column may also be referred to as the “first distillate” or “first residue.” The distillates or residues of the other columns may also be referred to with similar numeric modifiers (second, third, etc.) in order to distinguish them from one another, but such modifiers should not be construed as requiring any particular separation order.
In an embodiment of the present invention, column 107 may be operated at a temperature where most of the water, ethanol, ethyl acetate and acetic acid are removed from the residue stream and only a small amount of ethanol and water is collected in the distillate stream due to the formation of binary and tertiary azeotropes. The weight ratio of water in the residue in line 114 to water in the distillate in line 115 may be greater than 1:1, e.g., greater than 2:1. The weight ratio of ethanol in the residue to ethanol in the distillate may be greater than 1:1, e.g., greater than 2:1.
The amount of acetic acid in the first residue may vary depending primarily on the conversion in reactor 103. In one embodiment, when the conversion is high, e.g., greater than 90%, the amount of acetic acid in the first residue may be less than 10 wt. %, e.g., less than 5 wt. % or less than 2 wt. %. In other embodiments, when the conversion is lower, e.g., less than 90%, the amount of acetic acid in the first residue may be greater than 10 wt. %.
In some embodiments, the separation in first column 107 may be conducted without the addition of an azeotrope or extractive agent.
The distillate preferably is substantially free of acetic acid, e.g., comprising less than 1000 wppm, less than 500 wppm or less than 100 wppm acetic acid. The distillate may be purged from the system or recycled in whole or part to reactor 103. In some embodiments, when the distillate comprises ethyl acetate and acetaldehyde, the distillate may be further separated, e.g., in a distillation column (not shown), into an acetaldehyde stream and an ethyl acetate stream. Either of these streams may be returned to the reactor 103 or separated from system 100 as a separate product.
Some species, such as acetals, may decompose in first column 107 such that very low amounts, or even no detectable amounts, of acetals remain in the distillate or residue.
In addition, an equilibrium reaction between acetic acid/ethanol and ethyl acetate may occur in the crude ethanol product after it exits reactor 103. Depending on the concentration of acetic acid in the crude ethanol product, this equilibrium may be driven toward formation of ethyl acetate. This reaction may be regulated through the residence time and/or temperature of the crude ethanol product.
The columns shown in
The associated condensers and liquid separation vessels that may be employed with each of the distillation columns may be of any conventional design and are simplified in the figures. Heat may be supplied to the base of each column or to a circulating bottom stream through a heat exchanger or reboiler. Other types of reboilers, such as internal reboilers, may also be used. The heat that is provided to the reboilers may be derived from any heat generated during the process that is integrated with the reboilers or from an external source such as another heat generating chemical process or a boiler. Although one reactor and one flasher are shown in the figures, additional reactors, flashers, condensers, heating elements, and other components may be used in various embodiments of the present invention. As will be recognized by those skilled in the art, various condensers, pumps, compressors, reboilers, drums, valves, connectors, separation vessels, etc., normally employed in carrying out chemical processes may also be combined and employed in the processes of the present invention.
The temperatures and pressures employed in the columns may vary. As a practical matter, pressures from 10 kPa to 3000 kPa will generally be employed in these zones although in some embodiments subatmospheric pressures or superatmospheric pressures may be employed. Temperatures within the various zones will normally range between the boiling points of the composition removed as the distillate and the composition removed as the residue. As will be recognized by those skilled in the art, the temperature at a given location in an operating distillation column is dependent on the composition of the material at that location and the pressure of column. In addition, feed rates may vary depending on the size of the production process and, if described, may be generically referred to in terms of feed weight ratios.
In one embodiment, due to the composition of first residue in line 114 the equilibrium may favor esterification to produce ethyl acetate. While the esterification, either in the liquid or vapor phase, may consume ethanol, the esterification may also reduce the amount of acetic acid that needs to be removed from the process. The in-situ formed ethyl acetate may be removed together the ethyl acetate formed in reactor 103 withdrawn into the first residue in line 114. The esterification may be further promoted passing a portion of the first residue in line 114 through an esterification reactor. The esterification reactor may be either a liquid or vapor phase reactor and may comprise an acidic catalyst. Acid-catalyzed esterification reactions may be used with some embodiments of the present invention. The catalyst should be thermally stable at reaction temperatures. Suitable catalysts may be solid acid catalysts comprising an ion exchange resin, zeolites, Lewis acid, metal oxides, inorganic salts and hydrates thereof, and heteropoly acid and salts thereof. Silica gel, aluminum oxide, and aluminum phosphate are also suitable catalysts. Acid catalysts include, but are not limited to, sulfuric acid, and tosic acid. In addition, Lewis acids may also be used as esterification catalysts, such as scandium(III) or lanthanide(III) triflates, hafnium(IV) or zirconium(IV) salts, and diarylammonium arenesulfonates. The catalyst may also include sulfonated (sulphonic acid) ion-exchange resins (e.g., gel-type and macroporous sulfonated styrene-divinyl benzene IERs), sulfonated polysiloxane resins, sulfonated perfluorinated (e.g., sulfonated poly-perfluoroethylene), or sulfonated zirconia.
To recover ethanol, the first residue in line 114 may be further separated depending on the concentration of acetic acid and/or ethyl acetate. In most embodiments of the present invention, residue in line 114 is further separated in a second column 108. In
In
The weight ratio of ethanol in the second distillate in line 118 to ethanol in the second residue in line 117 preferably is at least 35:1. In one embodiment, the weight ratio of water in the second residue 117 to water in the second distillate 118 is greater than 2:1, e.g., greater than 4:1 or greater than 6:1. In addition, the weight ratio of acetic acid in the second residue 117 to acetic acid in the second distillate 118 preferably is greater than 10:1, e.g., greater than 15:1 or greater than 20:1. Preferably, the second distillate in line 118 is substantially free of acetic acid and may only contain, if any, trace amounts of acetic acid. A reduced concentration of acetic acid in line 118 advantageously provides an ethanol product that also has no amount or a trace amount of acetic acid.
In some optional embodiments, when ethyl acetate is used alone as a feed, the second residue exemplified in Table 4 may comprise high boiling point components. Preferably, these high boiling point components comprise alcohols having more than two carbon atoms.
In one embodiment, ethyl acetate fed to second column 108 may concentrate in the second distillate in line 118. Thus, preferably no ethyl acetate is withdrawn in the second residue in line 117. Advantageously this allows most of the ethyl acetate to be subsequently recovered without having to further process the second residue in line 117.
As shown in FIG. 1., a third column 125, referred to as a “light ends” column, is used for removing ethyl acetate from the second distillate in line 118 and producing an ethanol product in line 127. The third distillate may be purged from the system in line 128, may be condensed and refluxed back into third column 125 or may be recycled in whole or in part to column 107. The third residue in line 127 from third column 125 may comprise ethanol and optionally any remaining water. The third residue may be further processed to recover ethanol with a desired amount of water, for example, using a further distillation column, adsorption unit, membrane or combination thereof, may be used to further remove water from third residue in line 127 as necessary. Third column 125 is preferably a tray column as described above and preferably operates at atmospheric pressure. The temperature of the third residue exiting from third column 125 preferably is from 60° C. to 110° C., e.g., from 70° C. to 100° C. or from 75° C. to 95° C. The temperature of the third distillate exiting from third column 125 preferably is from 70° C. to 115° C., e.g., from 80° C. to 110° C. or from 85° C. to 105° C., when the column is operated at atmospheric pressure.
The remaining water from the second distillate in line 118 may be removed in further embodiments of the present invention. Depending on the water concentration, the ethanol product may be derived from the second distillate in line 118. Some applications, such as industrial ethanol applications, may tolerate water in the ethanol product, while other applications, such as fuel applications, may require an anhydrous ethanol. The amount of water in the distillate of line 118 may be closer to the azeotropic amount of water, e.g., at least 4 wt. %, preferably less than 20 wt. %, e.g., less than 12 wt. % or less than 7.5 wt. %. Water may be removed from the second distillate in line 118 using several different separation techniques. Particularly preferred techniques include the use of distillation column, membranes, adsorption units and combinations thereof.
In one embodiment, water may be removed prior to light ends column 125. As shown in
In a preferred embodiment, water separator 132 is a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) unit. The PSA unit is optionally operated at a temperature from 30° C. to 160° C., e.g., from 80° C. to 140° C., and a pressure of from 0.01 kPa to 550 kPa, e.g., from 1 kPa to 150 kPa. The PSA unit may comprise two to five beds. Water separator 132 may remove at least 95% of the water from the second distillate in line 131, and more preferably from 99% to 99.99% of the water from the second distillate, in a water stream 133. All or a portion of water stream 133 may be returned to column 108 in line 134. Additionally or alternatively, all or a portion of water stream 133 may be purged. The remaining portion of second distillate 131 exits the water separator 132 as ethanol mixture stream 135. A portion of the second distillate in line 118 may be condensed and refluxed in line 130 to second column 108, as shown, for example, at a ratio of from 10:1 to 1:100, e.g., from 2:1 to 1:50 or from 1:1 to 1:10. It is understand that reflux ratios may vary with the number of stages, feed locations, column efficiency and/or feed composition. Operating with a reflux ratio of greater than 3:1 may be less preferred because more energy may be required to operate first column 108.
In one embodiment, the third residue in line 127 may comprise from 75 to 96 wt. % ethanol and less than 12 wt. % water, more preferably less than 3 wt. % water. Depending on the desired ethanol application and on the concentration of organics in the third distillate, the resulting third residue in line 127 may be withdrawn from the system as the finished ethanol product. For some ethanol applications, it may be desirable to remove residual water from the third residue in line 127. Residual water removal may be accomplished, for example, using one or more adsorption units, membranes, molecular sieves, extractive distillation units, or a combination thereof. Suitable adsorption units include pressure swing adsorption systems and thermal swing adsorption units.
Depending on the amount of water and acetic acid contained in the second residue of second column 108, line 117 may be treated in one or more of the following processes. When the residue comprises a majority of acetic acid, e.g., greater than 70 wt. %, the residue may be recycled to the reactor without any separation of the water. In one embodiment, the residue may be separated into an acetic acid stream and a water stream when the residue comprises a majority of acetic acid, e.g., greater than 50 wt. %. Acetic acid may also be recovered in some embodiments from first residue having a lower acetic acid concentration. The residue may be separated into the acetic acid and water streams by a distillation column or one or more membranes. If a membrane or an array of membranes is employed to separate the acetic acid from the water, the membrane or array of membranes may be selected from any suitable acid resistant membrane that is capable of removing a permeate water stream. The resulting acetic acid stream optionally is returned to reactor 103. The resulting water stream may be used as an extractive agent or to hydrolyze an ester-containing stream in a hydrolysis unit.
In other embodiments, for example where second residue in line 117 comprises less than 50 wt. % acetic acid, possible options include one or more of: (i) returning a portion of the residue to reactor 103, (ii) neutralizing the acetic acid, (iii) reacting the acetic acid with an alcohol, or (iv) disposing of the residue in a waste water treatment facility. It also may be possible to separate a residue comprising less than 50 wt. % acetic acid using a weak acid recovery distillation column to which a solvent (optionally acting as an azeotroping agent) may be added. Exemplary solvents that may be suitable for this purpose include ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, butyl acetate, vinyl acetate, diisopropyl ether, carbon disulfide, tetrahydrofuran, isopropanol, ethanol, and C3-C12 alkanes. When neutralizing the acetic acid, it is preferred that the residue in line 113 comprises less than 10 wt. % acetic acid. Acetic acid may be neutralized with any suitable alkali or alkaline earth metal base, such as sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide. When reacting acetic acid with an alcohol, it is preferred that the residue comprises less than 50 wt. % acetic acid. The alcohol may be any suitable alcohol, such as methanol, ethanol, propanol, butanol, or mixtures thereof. The reaction forms an ester that may be integrated with other systems, such as carbonylation production or an ester production process. Preferably, the alcohol comprises ethanol and the resulting ester comprises ethyl acetate. Optionally, the resulting ester may be fed to the hydrogenation reactor.
In some embodiments, when the second residue comprises very minor amounts of acetic acid, e.g., less than 5 wt. %, the residue may be disposed of to a waste water treatment facility without further processing. The organic content, e.g., acetic acid content, of the residue beneficially may be suitable to feed microorganisms used in a waste water treatment facility.
The ethanol product produced by the process of the present invention may be an industrial grade ethanol comprising from 75 to 96 wt. % ethanol, e.g., from 80 to 96 wt. % or from 85 to 96 wt. % ethanol, based on the total weight of the ethanol product. Exemplary finished ethanol compositional ranges are provided below in Table 5.
The finished ethanol composition of the present invention preferably contains very low amounts, e.g., less than 0.5 wt. %, of other alcohols, such as methanol, butanol, isobutanol, isoamyl alcohol and other C4-C20 alcohols. In one embodiment, the amount of isopropanol in the finished ethanol composition is from 80 to 1,000 wppm, e.g., from 95 to 1,000 wppm, from 100 to 700 wppm, or from 150 to 500 wppm. In one embodiment, the finished ethanol composition is substantially free of acetaldehyde, optionally comprising less than 8 wppm acetaldehyde, e.g., less than 5 wppm or less than 1 wppm.
In some embodiments, when further water separation is used, the ethanol product may be withdrawn as a stream from the water separation unit as discussed above. In such embodiments, the ethanol concentration of the ethanol product may be higher than indicated in Table 7, and preferably is greater than 97 wt. % ethanol, e.g., greater than 98 wt. % or greater than 99.5 wt. %. The ethanol product in this aspect preferably comprises less than 3 wt. % water, e.g., less than 2 wt. % or less than 0.5 wt. %.
The finished ethanol composition produced by the embodiments of the present invention may be used in a variety of applications including applications as fuels, solvents, chemical feedstocks, pharmaceutical products, cleansers, sanitizers, hydrogenation transport or consumption. In fuel applications, the finished ethanol composition may be blended with gasoline for motor vehicles such as automobiles, boats and small piston engine aircraft. In non-fuel applications, the finished ethanol composition may be used as a solvent for toiletry and cosmetic preparations, detergents, disinfectants, coatings, inks, and pharmaceuticals. The finished ethanol composition may also be used as a processing solvent in manufacturing processes for medicinal products, food preparations, dyes, photochemicals and latex processing.
The finished ethanol composition may also be used as a chemical feedstock to make other chemicals such as vinegar, ethyl acrylate, ethyl acetate, ethylene, glycol ethers, ethylamines, aldehydes, and higher alcohols, especially butanol. In the production of ethyl acetate, the finished ethanol composition may be esterified with acetic acid. In another application, the finished ethanol composition may be dehydrated to produce ethylene. Any known dehydration catalyst can be employed to dehydrate ethanol, such as those described in copending U.S. Pub. Nos. 2010/0030002 and 2010/0030001, the entireties of which is incorporated herein by reference. A zeolite catalyst, for example, may be employed as the dehydration catalyst. Preferably, the zeolite has a pore diameter of at least about 0.6 nm, and preferred zeolites include dehydration catalysts selected from the group consisting of mordenites, ZSM-5, a zeolite X and a zeolite Y. Zeolite X is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 2,882,244 and zeolite Yin U.S. Pat. No. 3,130,007, the entireties of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
While the invention has been described in detail, modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art. In addition, it should be understood that aspects of the invention and portions of various embodiments and various features recited herein and/or in the appended claims may be combined or interchanged either in whole or in part. In the foregoing descriptions of the various embodiments, those embodiments which refer to another embodiment may be appropriately combined with one or more other embodiments, as will be appreciated by one of skill in the art. Furthermore, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the foregoing description is by way of example only, and is not intended to limit the invention.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/292,914, filed on Nov. 9, 2011, which claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/094,588, filed on Apr. 26, 2011, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,686,200, the entire contents and disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2607807 | Ford | Aug 1952 | A |
2649407 | Harrison et al. | Aug 1953 | A |
2702783 | Harrison et al. | Feb 1955 | A |
2801209 | Muller et al. | Jul 1957 | A |
2882244 | Milton | Apr 1959 | A |
3102150 | Hunter et al. | Aug 1963 | A |
3130007 | Breck | Apr 1964 | A |
3408267 | Miller et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3445345 | Katzen et al. | May 1969 | A |
3478112 | Karl et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3769329 | Paulik et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3990952 | Katzen et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4126539 | Derr, Jr. et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4149940 | Pinto | Apr 1979 | A |
4275228 | Gruffaz et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4306942 | Brush et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4317918 | Takano et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4319058 | Kulprathipanja et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4352940 | Adelman et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4379028 | Berg et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4395576 | Kwantes et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4398039 | Pesa et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4421939 | Kiff et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4422903 | Messick et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4443639 | Pesa et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4454358 | Kummer et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4465854 | Pond et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4471136 | Larkins et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4480115 | McGinnis | Oct 1984 | A |
4492808 | Hagen et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4497967 | Wan | Feb 1985 | A |
4517391 | Schuster et al. | May 1985 | A |
4520213 | Victor | May 1985 | A |
4541897 | Sommer et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4626321 | Grethlein et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4678543 | Houben et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4692218 | Houben et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4777303 | Kitson et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4804791 | Kitson et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4842693 | Wheldon | Jun 1989 | A |
4886905 | Larkins et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4908477 | Hartmann et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4961826 | Grethlein et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4978778 | Isshiki et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4985572 | Kitson et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4990655 | Kitson et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994608 | Torrence et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5001259 | Smith et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5026908 | Smith et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5035776 | Knapp | Jul 1991 | A |
5061671 | Kitson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5070016 | Hallberg et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5124004 | Grethlein et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5144068 | Smith et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5149680 | Kitson et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5185481 | Muto et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5198592 | Van Beijnum et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5215902 | Tedder | Jun 1993 | A |
5227141 | Kim et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5233099 | Tabata et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5237108 | Marraccini et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5250271 | Horizoe et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5348625 | Berg | Sep 1994 | A |
5414161 | Uhm et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415741 | Berg | May 1995 | A |
5426246 | Nagahara et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5437770 | Berg | Aug 1995 | A |
5445716 | Berg | Aug 1995 | A |
5449440 | Rescalli et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5502248 | Funk et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
RE35377 | Steinberg et al. | Nov 1996 | E |
5599976 | Scates et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5762765 | Berg | Jun 1998 | A |
5770770 | Kim et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5800681 | Berg | Sep 1998 | A |
5821111 | Grady et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5861530 | Atkins et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5973193 | Crane et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5993610 | Berg | Nov 1999 | A |
6040474 | Jobson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6093845 | Van Acker et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6121498 | Tustin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6143930 | Singh et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6232352 | Vidalin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6294703 | Hara et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6326515 | Clode et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6375807 | Nieuwoudt et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6444842 | Gerberich et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458996 | Muskett | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6462231 | Yanagawa et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6472555 | Choudary et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6486366 | Ostgard et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6495730 | Konishi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6509180 | Verser et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6627770 | Cheung et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632330 | Colley et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6657078 | Scates et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6685754 | Kindig et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6693213 | Kolena et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6696596 | Herzog et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6723886 | Allison et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6755975 | Vane et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6765110 | Warner et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768021 | Horan et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6809217 | Colley et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6906228 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6927048 | Verser et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7005541 | Cheung et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7074603 | Verser et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7084312 | Huber et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7115772 | Picard et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7208624 | Scates et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7223886 | Scates et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7297236 | Vander Griend et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7351559 | Verser et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7399892 | Rix et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7507562 | Verser et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7553397 | Colley et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7572353 | Vander et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7601865 | Verser et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7608744 | Johnston et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7682812 | Verser et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7700814 | Garton et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7732173 | Mairal et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744727 | Blum et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7834223 | Atkins | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7842844 | Atkins | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7863489 | Johnston et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7884253 | Stites et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888082 | Verser et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7906680 | Scates et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7947746 | Daniel et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8071821 | Johnston et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8686200 | Lee et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8927784 | Lee et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
20030013908 | Horan et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030077771 | Verser et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050197506 | Scates et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060019360 | Verser et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060127999 | Verser et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070031954 | Mairal et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070106246 | Modesitt | May 2007 | A1 |
20070270511 | Melnichuk et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080135396 | Blum | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080193989 | Verser et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080207953 | Houssin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090005588 | Hassan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090014313 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090023192 | Verser et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090069609 | Kharas et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090081749 | Verser et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090166172 | Casey et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090221725 | Chorney et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090270651 | Zinobile et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281354 | Mariansky et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299092 | Beavis et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318573 | Stites et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326080 | Chornet et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100016454 | Gracey et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100029980 | Johnston et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100029995 | Johnston et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030001 | Chen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030002 | Johnston et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100121114 | Johnston et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137630 | Garton et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100197485 | Johnston et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100197985 | Johnston et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204512 | Kimmich et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110004033 | Johnston et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110046421 | Daniel et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110082322 | Jevtic et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110190547 | Jevtic et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110190548 | Jevtic et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110275861 | Johnston et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110275862 | Johnston et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120010437 | Jevtic | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120010438 | Lee et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120010439 | Jevtic | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120010440 | Sarager | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120010445 | Johnston et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120273338 | Lee | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277481 | Warner et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277497 | Lee | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120323049 | Lee | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323050 | Lee | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10159349 | Sep 2009 | CN |
201768393 | Mar 2011 | CN |
102228831 | Nov 2011 | CN |
102229520 | Nov 2011 | CN |
0056488 | Jul 1982 | EP |
0104197 | Apr 1984 | EP |
0137749 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0167300 | Jan 1986 | EP |
0175558 | Mar 1986 | EP |
0192587 | Aug 1986 | EP |
0198682 | Oct 1986 | EP |
0285420 | Oct 1988 | EP |
0285786 | Oct 1988 | EP |
0400904 | May 1990 | EP |
0372847 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0456647 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0990638 | Apr 2000 | EP |
2060553 | May 2009 | EP |
2060555 | May 2009 | EP |
2072487 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2072488 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2072489 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2072492 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2186787 | May 2010 | EP |
4-193304 | Jul 1992 | JP |
6-116182 | Apr 1994 | JP |
2001-046874 | Feb 2001 | JP |
WO 8303409 | Oct 1983 | WO |
WO 02092541 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 2005102513 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2007003897 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2008135192 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2009009320 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009009322 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009009323 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009048335 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009063174 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2009063176 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2009105860 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2010014151 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2010055285 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2011097193 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2011097219 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2011097220 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2011140485 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO 2012006228 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO 2012006499 | Jan 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alcala, et al., (2005). Experimental and DFT studies of the conversion of ethanol and acetic acid on PtSn-based catalysts, Journal of Physical Chemistry, 109(6), 2074-2085. |
Amit M. Goda et al., DFT modeling of selective reduction of acetic acid to acetaldehyde on Pt-based bimetallic catalysts, 20th NAM, Houston, TX, Jun. 17-22, 2007 available online at <http://www.nacatsoc.org/20nam/abstracts/O-S9-18.pdf>. |
Anonymous, “Studies in Extractive and Azeotropic Distillation Series: Study No. 4—Separation of Alcohols from the Acetate/Alcohol/Water Ternary by Extractive Distillation”, May 9, 2008, pp. 1-9. |
Gursahani et al., Reaction kinetics measurements and analysis of reaction pathways for conversions of acetic acid, ethanol, and ethyl acetate over silica-supported Pt, Applied Catalysis A: General 222 (2001) 369-392. |
H. Constantin et al., “Influence of C-Sources on the Denitrification Rate of a High-Nitrate Concentrated Industrial Wastewater”, Wat. Res. vol. 31, No. 3, 1997, pp. 583-589. |
Hidetoshi Kita et al., “Synthesis of a zeolite NaA membrane for pervaporation of water/organic liquid mixtures”, Journal of Materials Science Letters, 14 (1995) 206-208. |
Hilmen, Separation of Azeotropic Mixtures: Tools for Analysis and Studies on Batch Distillation Operation (Nov. 2000) p. 17-20. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/023276 mailed Sep. 2, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Apr. 19, 2012 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2011/060019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Aug. 2, 2012 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2012/035220. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Aug. 6, 2012 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2012/035196. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 11, 2012 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2012/035203. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 30, 2012 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2012/035189. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 30, 2012 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2012/035273. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 6, 2012 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2011/059889. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jun. 29, 2012 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2011/060014. |
J. Jones, et al., Platinum Metals Review, vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 94-104 (Jul. 2000). |
Marian Simo et al., “Adsorption/Desorption of Water and Ethanol on 3A Zeolite in Near-Adiabatic Fixed Bed”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2009, 48, 9247-9260. |
N. Calvar et al., “Esterification of acetic acid with ethanol: Reaction kinetics and operation in a packed bed reactive distillation column”, Chemical Engineering and Processing, 46 (207) 1317-1323. |
Office Action for corresponding Chinese Appl. No. 201180044408.3 dated Aug. 18, 2014. |
Pallasana et al., Reaction Paths in the Hydrogenolysis of Acetic Acid to Ethanol over Pd(111), Re(0001), and RdRe Alloys, Journal of Catalysis 209, 289-305 Mar. 1, 2002. |
Rachmady, Acetic Acid Reduction by H2 on Bimetallic Pt—Fe Catalysts, Journal of Catalysis 209, 87-98 (Apr. 1, 2002), Elsevier Science (USA). |
Santori et al.(2000). Hydrogenation of carbonylic compounds on Pt/SiO2 catalysts modified with SnBu4, Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 130, 2063-2068. |
Spivey et al., “Heterogeneous catalytic synthesis of ethanol from biomass-dervied syngas,” Chemical Society Review, 2007, vol. 36, pp. 1514-1528. |
Subramani et al., “A Review of Recent Literature to Search for an Efficient Catalytic Process for the Conversion of Syngas to Ethanol,” Energy & Fuels, 2008, vol. 22, pp. 814-839. |
Tracy J. Benson et al., “Cellulose Based Adsorbent Materials for the Dehydration of Ethanol Using Thermal Swing Adsorption”, Adsorption, vol. 11, 2005, pp. 697-701. |
V. Ragaini et al., “Increasing the value of dilute acetic acid streams through esterification Part 1. Experimental analysis of the reaction zone”, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 64, 2006, pp. 66-71. |
Witzeman and Agreda, “Safety and Performance Assessment of Ethanol/Diesel Blends (e-blend)” NREL/SR-540-34817, at p. 1-1, Sep. 2003. |
Y. Zhu et al., “Techno-economic Analysis for the Thermochemical Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol via Acetic Acid Synthesis”, Apr. 1, 2009, pp. 1-71 (80 pages). |
Yu Huang et al., “Low-Energy Distillation-Membrane Separation Process”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 49, 2010, pp. 3760-3768. |
ZeaChem, Inc., Technology Overview, Lakewood, Colorado www.zeachem.com, 2008. |
Zheng, et al. (2007). Preparation and catalytic properties of a bimetallic Sn—Pt complex in the supercages of NaY zeolite by use of surface organometallic chemistry, Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 21(10), 836-840. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150099904 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13292914 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 14570486 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13094588 | Apr 2011 | US |
Child | 13292914 | US |