The claimed invention was made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement as defined under 35 U.S.C. 103(c) between the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Lorne Whitehead of the University of British Columbia, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger and Hugh Wilson of York University, and Avi Chaudhuri of McGill University.
The invention relates to displays for displaying digital images.
Dynamic range is the ratio of intensity of the highest luminance parts of a scene and the lowest luminance parts of a scene. For example, the image projected by a video projection system may have a maximum dynamic range of 300:1.
The human visual system is capable of recognizing features in scenes which have very high dynamic ranges. For example, a person can look into the shadows of an unlit garage on a brightly sunlit day and see details of objects in the shadows even though the luminance in adjacent sunlit areas may be thousands of times greater than the luminance in the shadow parts of the scene. To create a realistic rendering of such a scene can require a display having a dynamic range in excess of 1000:1. The term “high dynamic range” means dynamic ranges of 800:1 or more.
Modern digital imaging systems are capable of capturing and recording digital representations of scenes in which the dynamic range of the scene is preserved. Computer imaging systems are capable of synthesizing images having high dynamic ranges. However, current display technology is not capable of rendering images in a manner which faithfully reproduces high dynamic ranges.
Blackham et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,978,142 discloses a system for projecting an image onto a screen. The system has first and second light modulators which both modulate light from a light source. Each of the light modulators modulates light from the source at the pixel level. Light modulated by both of the light modulators is projected onto the screen.
Gibbon et al., PCT application No. PCT/US01/21367 discloses a projection system which includes a pre modulator. The pre modulator controls the amount of light incident on a deformable mirror display device. A separate pre-modulator may be used to darken a selected area (e.g. a quadrant).
There exists a need for cost effective displays capable of reproducing a wide range of light intensities in displayed images.
This invention provides displays for displaying images and methods for displaying images. One aspect of the invention provides a display comprising: a light source; a first spatial light modulator located to modulate light from the light source; a display screen comprising a second spatial light modulator; and, an optical system configured to image light modulated by the first spatial light modulator onto a first face of the display screen.
Another aspect of the invention provides a display comprising: a light source; a first spatial light modulator located to modulate light from the light source, the first spatial light modulator comprising an array of controllable pixels; and, a second spatial light modulator located to modulate light modulated by the first spatial light modulator the second spatial light modulator comprising an array of controllable pixels; wherein each pixel of one of the first and second spatial light modulators corresponds to a plurality of pixels of the other one of the first and second light modulators.
Another aspect of the invention provides a display device comprising: first spatial modulation means for providing light spatially modulated at a first spatial resolution; second spatial modulation means for further spatially modulating the light at a second resolution different from the first resolution; and, means for controlling the first and second spatial modulation means to display an image defined by image data.
A still further aspect of the invention provides a method for displaying an image having a high dynamic range. The method comprises: generating light, spatially modulating the light according to image data in a first light modulating step; and, imaging the spatially modulated light onto a screen comprising a light modulator.
Further aspects of the invention and features of specific embodiments of the invention are described below.
In drawings which illustrate non-limiting embodiments of the invention,
Throughout the following description, specific details are set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding of the invention. However, the invention may be practiced without these particulars. In other instances, well known elements have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative, rather than a restrictive, sense.
This invention provides displays capable of rendering images with high dynamic ranges. Displays according to the invention comprise two light modulating stages. Light passes through the stages in series to provide an image which has an increased dynamic range.
In the illustrated embodiment, light from light source 12 is directed toward a first light modulator 16. Light source 12 preferably provides substantially uniform illumination of first light modulator 16. Light modulator 16 comprises an array of individually addressable elements. Light modulator 16 may comprise, for example, a LCD (liquid crystal display), which is an example of a transmission-type light modulator or a DMD (deformable mirror device), which is an example of a reflection-type light modulator. Display driver circuitry (not shown in
Light which has been modulated by first light modulator 16 is imaged onto a rear-projection screen 23 by a suitable optical system 17. Light from a small area of first light modulator 16 is directed by optical system 17 to a corresponding area on rear-projection screen 23. In the illustrated embodiment, optical system 17 comprises a lens having a focal length f. In general, the optical system 17 which images light modulated by first light modulator 16 onto rear-projection screen 23 may comprise one or more mirrors, lenses or other optical elements. Such an optical system has the function of imaging light modulated by the first light modulator onto a second light modulator.
In the illustrated embodiment, rear-projection screen 23 comprises a second light modulator 20 and a collimator 18. A main function of collimator 18 is to cause light which passes through rear-projection screen 23 to be directed preferentially toward a viewing area. Collimator 18 may comprise a Fresnel lens, a holographic lens, or, in the alternative, another arrangement of one or more lenses and/or other optical elements which will guide light in the direction of a viewing area.
In the illustrated embodiment, collimator 18 causes light to travel through the elements of second light modulator 20 in a direction which is generally normal to screen 23. As light incident from collimator 18 travels through second light modulator 20 it is further modulated. The light then passes to a diffuser 22 which scatters the outgoing light through a range of directions so that a viewer located on an opposite side of diffuser 22 from first light modulator 16 can see light originating from the whole area of screen 23. In general, diffuser 22 may scatter light to a different angular extent in the horizontal and vertical planes. Diffuser 22 should be selected so that light modulated by second light modulator 20 is scattered through a range of angles such that the maximum scatter angle is at least equal to the angle subtended by screen 23 when viewed from a desired viewing location.
Rear-projection screen 23 may differ in area from first light modulator 16. For example, rear-projection screen 23 may be larger in area than first light modulator 16. Where this is the case, optical system 17 expands the beam of light modulated by first light modulator 16 to illuminate a larger corresponding area on rear-projection screen 23.
Second light modulator 20 may be of the same type as first light modulator 16 or a different type. Where first and second light modulators 16 and 20 are both of types that polarize light, second light modulator 20 should, as much as is practical, be oriented so that its plane of polarization matches that of the light incident on it from first light modulator 16.
Display 10 may be a color display. This may be achieved in various ways including:
As shown in
As shown in
The luminance of any point on output diffuser 22 can be adjusted by controlling the amount of light passed on by corresponding elements of light modulators 16, 20 and 26. This control may be provided by a suitable control system (not shown in
As noted above, light modulators 16, 20 and 26 may all be of the same type or may be of two or more different types.
Light modulator 36 may have any of various constructions. For example, light modulator 36 may comprise an array of LCD elements each having a controllable transmissivity located in front of a reflective backing. Light projected by projector 37 passes through each LCD element and is reflected back through the LCD element by the reflective backing. The luminance at any point on screen 34 is determined by the intensity of light received at that point by projector 37 and the degree to which light modulator 36 (e.g. the LCD element at that point) absorbs light being transmitted through it.
Light modulator 36 could also comprise an array of elements having variable retro-reflection properties. The elements may be prismatic. Such elements are described, for example, in Whitehead, U.S. Pat. No. 5,959,777 entitled Passive High Efficiency Variable Reflectivity Image Display Device and, Whitehead et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,215,920 entitled Electrophoretic, High Index and Phase Transition Control of Total Internal Reflection in High Efficiency Variable Reflectivity Image Displays.
Light modulator 36 could also comprise an array of electrophoretic display elements as described, for example, in Albert et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,172,798 entitled Shutter Mode Microencapsulated Electrophoretic Display; Comiskey et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,120,839 entitled Electro-osmotic Displays and Materials for Making the Same; Jacobson, U.S. Pat. No. 6,120,588 entitled: Electronically Addressable Microencapsulated Ink and Display; Jacobson et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,323,989 entitled Electrophoretic Displays Using Nanoparticles; Albert, U.S. Pat. No. 6,300,932 entitled Electrophoretic Displays with Luminescent Particles and Materials for Making the Same or, Comiskey et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,327,072 entitled Microcell Electrophoretic Displays.
As shown in
Where light modulator 36 comprises an array of elements having variable retro-reflection properties, the elements themselves could be designed to direct retro-reflected light preferentially in a direction of a viewing area in front of screen 34. Reflective layer 43 may be patterned to scatter light to either augment the effect of scattering centers 45 or replace scattering centers 45.
As shown in
The cost of a light modulator and its associated control circuitry tends to increase with the number of addressable elements in the light modulator. In some embodiments of the invention one of the light modulators has a spatial resolution significantly higher than that of one or more other ones of the light modulators. When one or more of the light modulators are lower-resolution devices the cost of a display according to such embodiments of the invention may be reduced. In color displays comprising two or more light modulators, one of which is a color light modulator (a combination of a plurality of monochrome light modulators may constitute a color light modulator as shown, for example, in
The size of pixels 42 of the lower-resolution one of the first and second light modulators determines the scale over which one can reliably go from maximum intensity to minimum intensity. Consider, for example,
Outside of spot 47 there are two regions. In region 48 it is not possible to set the luminance to its minimum value because in that region the lower-resolution light modulator is set to its highest luminance value. In region 49 both of the light modulators can be set to their lowest-luminance values. If, for example, each of the first and second light modulators has a luminance range of 1 to 100 units, then region 47 might have a luminance of 100×100=10,000 units, region 48 would have a luminance of 100×1=100 units and region 49 would have a luminance of 1×1=1 units.
As a result of having one of the light modulators lower in resolution than the other, each pixel of the lower-resolution light modulator corresponds to more than one pixel in the higher-resolution light modulator. It is not possible for points corresponding to any one pixel of the lower-resolution light modulator and different pixels of the higher-resolution light modulator to have luminance values at extremes of the device's dynamic range. The maximum difference in luminance between such points is determined by the dynamic range provided by the higher-resolution light modulator.
It is generally not a problem that a display is not capable of causing closely-spaced points to differ in luminance from one another by the full dynamic range of the display. The human eye has enough intrinsic scatter that it is incapable of appreciating large changes in luminance which occur over very short distances in any event.
In a display according to the invention which includes both a lower-resolution spatial light modulator and a higher-resolution spatial light modulator, controller 39 may determine a value for each pixel of the lower-resolution spatial light modulator and adjust the signals which control the higher-resolution spatial light modulator to reduce artefacts which result from the fact that each pixel of the lower-resolution spatial light modulator is common to a plurality of pixels of the higher-resolution spatial light modulator. This may be done in any of a wide number of ways.
For example, consider the case where each pixel of the lower-resolution spatial light modulator corresponds to a plurality of pixels of the higher-resolution spatial light modulator. Image data specifying a desired image is supplied to the controller. The image data indicates a desired luminance for an image area corresponding to each of the pixels of the higher-resolution spatial light modulator. The controller may set the pixels of the lower-resolution light modulator to provide an approximation of the desired image. This could be accomplished, for example, by determining an average or weighted average of the desired luminance values for the image areas corresponding to each pixel of the lower-resolution light modulator.
The controller may then set the pixels of the higher-resolution light modulator to cause the resulting image to approach the desired image. This could be done, for example, by dividing the desired luminance values by the known intensity of light incident from the lower-resolution light modulator on the corresponding pixels of the higher-resolution light modulator. Processing to generate the signals for driving the light modulators may be performed on the fly by controller 39, may be performed earlier by controller 39 or some other device and integrated into the image data or some processing may be performed earlier and controller 39 may perform final processing to generate the control signals.
If the low-resolution pixels are too large then a viewer may be able to discern a halo around bright elements in an image. The low resolution pixels are preferably small enough that the appearance of bright patches on dark backgrounds or of dark spots on bright backgrounds is not unacceptably degraded. It is currently considered practical to provide in the range of about 8 to about 144, more preferably about 9 to 36, pixels on the higher-resolution light modulator for each pixel of the lower-resolution light modulator.
The sizes of steps in which each of pixels 42 and 44 can adjust the luminance of point(s) on the image are not necessarily equal. The pixels of the lower-resolution light modulator may adjust light intensity in coarser steps than the pixels of the higher-resolution light modulator. For example, the lower-resolution light modulator may permit adjustment of light intensity for each pixel over an intensity range of 1 to 512 units in 8 steps while the higher-resolution light modulator may permit adjustment of the light intensity for each pixel over a similar range in 512 steps. While pixels 42 and 44 are both illustrated as being square in
The pixels of the lower-resolution light modulator preferably emit light which is somewhat diffuse so that the light intensity varies reasonably smoothly as one traverses pixels of the lower-resolution light modulator. This is the case where the light from each of the pixels of the lower-resolution light modulator spreads into adjacent pixels, as shown in
In the embodiment of
For front projection-type displays (for example the display 10C of
Projector 37 may have any suitable construction. All that is required is that projector 37 be able to project light which has been spatially modulated to provide an image onto screen 34.
As will be apparent to those skilled in the art in the light of the foregoing disclosure, many alterations and modifications are possible in the practice of this invention without departing from the spirit or scope thereof. For example:
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/175,046 filed 7 Feb. 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/757,822 filed 3 Feb. 2013 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,684,533, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/627,558 filed 26 Sep. 2012 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,408,718, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/440,246 filed 5 Apr. 2012 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,277,056, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/097,823 filed 29 Apr. 2011 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,172,401, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/855,918 filed 13 Aug. 2010 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,942,531, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/410,125 filed 24 Mar. 2009 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,801,426, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/831,749 filed 31 Jul. 2007 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,581,837, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/702,839 filed 5 Feb. 2007 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,413,307, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/351,962 filed 10 Feb. 2006 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,172,297, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/112,428 filed 22 Apr. 2005 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,106,505, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/469,473 (accorded the filing date of 27 Aug. 2003) now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,891,672, which is the US National Stage of International Application No. PCT/CA2002/000255 filed 27 Feb. 2002 and entitled HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE DISPLAY DEVICES, which claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. provisional Patent Application No. 60/271,563 filed 27 Feb. 2001 and entitled HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE COLOUR DISPLAY AND PROJECTION TECHNOLOGY.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4170771 | Bly | Oct 1979 | A |
4229095 | Mir | Oct 1980 | A |
4316196 | Jacobs | Feb 1982 | A |
4364039 | Penz | Dec 1982 | A |
4374397 | Mir | Feb 1983 | A |
4378568 | Mir | Mar 1983 | A |
4441791 | Hornbeck | Apr 1984 | A |
4559480 | Nobs | Dec 1985 | A |
4580877 | Washo | Apr 1986 | A |
4637150 | Geluk | Jan 1987 | A |
4726663 | Buzak | Feb 1988 | A |
4801194 | Agostinelli et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4853824 | Tsuzurahara | Aug 1989 | A |
4868668 | Tavernetti | Sep 1989 | A |
4933754 | Reed et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4954789 | Sampsell | Sep 1990 | A |
4987410 | Berman et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4995719 | Shanks | Feb 1991 | A |
5029967 | Livezey et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5075789 | Jones et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5103328 | Numao | Apr 1992 | A |
5122791 | Gibbons et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5144292 | Shiraishi et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5247366 | Ginosar et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5359345 | Hunter | Oct 1994 | A |
5386253 | Fielding | Jan 1995 | A |
5422691 | Ninomiya et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5504504 | Markandey et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5537233 | Miura et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537256 | Fergason | Jul 1996 | A |
5572341 | Fergason | Nov 1996 | A |
5592193 | Chen | Jan 1997 | A |
5638167 | Nakamura | Jun 1997 | A |
5639158 | Sato | Jun 1997 | A |
5646702 | Akinwande et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652672 | Huignard et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5666226 | Ezra et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5684354 | Gleckman | Nov 1997 | A |
5715029 | Fergason | Feb 1998 | A |
5717422 | Fergason | Feb 1998 | A |
5724062 | Hunter | Mar 1998 | A |
5729242 | Margerum et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748828 | Steiner et al. | May 1998 | A |
5784181 | Loiseaux et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5809215 | Heydinger et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815303 | Berlin | Sep 1998 | A |
5889567 | Swanson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892325 | Gleckman | Apr 1999 | A |
5926239 | Kumar et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5959777 | Whitehead | Sep 1999 | A |
5978142 | Blackham et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986628 | Tuenge et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6043591 | Gleckman | Mar 2000 | A |
6111559 | Motomura et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111560 | May | Aug 2000 | A |
6120588 | Jacobson | Sep 2000 | A |
6120839 | Comiskey et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133894 | Yagyu | Oct 2000 | A |
6144162 | Smith | Nov 2000 | A |
6163621 | Paik et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6172798 | Albert et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184969 | Fergason | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204913 | Miyawaki et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215920 | Whitehead et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229558 | Saigo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6229588 | Abileah et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243055 | Fergason | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243068 | Evanicky et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6268843 | Arakawa | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276801 | Fielding | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6300932 | Albert | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6323989 | Jacobson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327072 | Comiskey et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6381372 | Loce | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6414661 | Shen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421103 | Yamaguchi | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6428189 | Hochstein | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6435691 | Macey et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437769 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439731 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448951 | Sakaguchi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448955 | Evanicky et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6483643 | Zuchowski | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6520646 | Rodriguez, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6590561 | Kabel et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6608614 | Johnson | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6618115 | Hiroki | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621482 | Fuller | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6631995 | Stanton et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6644832 | Yoshida et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654156 | Crossland et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657607 | Evanicky et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671008 | Li et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6680834 | Williams | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6683657 | Miyawaki | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6728023 | Alioshin et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6753661 | Muthu et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6796658 | Hubel et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6803901 | Numao | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816141 | Fergason | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6817717 | Childers et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831624 | Harrold | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6831711 | Choi et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6863401 | Penn | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6888663 | Bourdelais et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6891672 | Whitehead et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6952195 | Arakawa | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6980176 | Matsumoto et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6980195 | Lonoce et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985272 | Bridgwater et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7002533 | Sayag | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7018046 | Childers et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7050122 | Gibbon et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7052152 | Harbers et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053881 | Itoh | May 2006 | B2 |
7064740 | Daly | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071907 | Duboc, Jr. et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7106505 | Whitehead et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118225 | Penn | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7172297 | Whitehead et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7175281 | Berman | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7403332 | Whitehead et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7413309 | Whitehead et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7419267 | Whitehead | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7532192 | Feng et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7942531 | Whitehead et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8172401 | Whitehead et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20010013854 | Ogoro | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010019390 | Itoh et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010035853 | Hoelen et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043179 | Yoshinaga et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020003522 | Baba et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020050957 | Nagano | May 2002 | A1 |
20020050958 | Matthies et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057238 | Nitta et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057253 | Lim et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020135553 | Nagai et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020159002 | Chang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163606 | Kitai et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020171617 | Fuller | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030048393 | Sayag | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030085857 | Ramanujan | May 2003 | A1 |
20030090455 | Daly | May 2003 | A1 |
20030137501 | Richards | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030151569 | Lee et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030206245 | Lin et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040012551 | Ishii | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040057017 | Childers et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040218388 | Suzuki | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050083295 | Daly | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050083296 | Daly | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050162737 | Whitehead et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050248554 | Feng et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050285841 | Lin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060028156 | Jungwirth | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060092183 | Malmberg | May 2006 | A1 |
20060125745 | Evanicky | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139954 | Kobori et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060227085 | Boldt, Jr. et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060232969 | Bogner et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070024576 | Hassan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070035706 | Margulis | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070097321 | Whitehead et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126992 | Penn | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070132956 | Whitehead et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070146257 | Whitehead et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070247833 | Lee et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070268211 | Whitehead et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268224 | Whitehead et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268577 | Whitehead et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080018985 | Whitehead et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030449 | Lee et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043034 | Whitehead et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043303 | Whitehead et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080074060 | Ye et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080150878 | Kang | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150879 | Kang | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20120120131 | Whitehead et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0730371 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0829747 | Mar 1998 | EP |
1003064 | May 2000 | EP |
1098291 | May 2001 | EP |
1136874 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1202244 | May 2002 | EP |
1431653 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1521235 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2702299 | Sep 1994 | FR |
S60-54120 | Apr 1985 | JP |
S60-54174 | Apr 1985 | JP |
62-234185 | Oct 1987 | JP |
S62-234133 | Oct 1987 | JP |
H2-162389 | Jun 1990 | JP |
H3-71111 | Mar 1991 | JP |
H3-198026 | Aug 1991 | JP |
H4-204591 | Jul 1992 | JP |
H05-45605 | Feb 1993 | JP |
H05-196959 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H06-11679 | Jan 1994 | JP |
H06-110033 | Apr 1994 | JP |
H07-104310 | Apr 1995 | JP |
H7-121120 | May 1995 | JP |
H08-76077 | Mar 1996 | JP |
H8-334742 | Dec 1996 | JP |
H09-116840 | May 1997 | JP |
09-189893 | Jul 1997 | JP |
10-239659 | Sep 1998 | JP |
H10-269802 | Oct 1998 | JP |
H10-282470 | Oct 1998 | JP |
H11-52412 | Feb 1999 | JP |
H11-064820 | Mar 1999 | JP |
H11-194336 | Jul 1999 | JP |
H11-237608 | Aug 1999 | JP |
H11-271889 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000-35576 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-214827 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-275595 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000-321571 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-100689 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-142409 | May 2001 | JP |
2002-91385 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-99250 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-140038 | May 2002 | JP |
2005-520188 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005-309338 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2009-053370 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2011-203323 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2012-008199 | Jan 2012 | JP |
9115843 | Oct 1991 | WO |
9406249 | Mar 1994 | WO |
9633483 | Oct 1996 | WO |
9919767 | Apr 1999 | WO |
0023831 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0040018 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0075720 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0119092 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0169584 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0169941 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0203687 | Jan 2002 | WO |
02069030 | Sep 2002 | WO |
02079862 | Oct 2002 | WO |
03077013 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2004031844 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2005101309 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2006010244 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006115852 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Funamoto et al., “High-Picture-Quality Technique for LCD Televisions: LCD-A1”, Proc. Sid, International Display Workshop (IDW '00), Nov. 2000, p. 1157-1158. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US07/02788 filed Jan. 31, 2007. |
Suzuki, Y., “Liquid Crystal Applications”, Television Technology Institute Reports, 1983. |
Ohara, A., “Backlight for Liquid Crystal Displays”, J. Illum. Institute of Japan, 1989, vol. 73(12). |
Mitsuhashi, Y. “Regarding LED Backlight Systems for LCDs”, Television Technology Institute Reports, 1986. |
Endo, N., “Transmissive Type Liquid Crystal Display Device”, Toshiba Technology Publication Collection, 1996. |
Funamoto, T. et al., “Technology for LCD Televisions with High Image Quality”, Matsushita Technical Journal, 2000, vol. 46(3). |
Ward, Greg, “A Wide Field, High Dynamic Range, Stereographic Viewer”, 2003. |
Ward, Greg, “A Wide-Field Stereoscopic High Dynamic Range Viewer”, Mar. 30, 2001. |
http://www.son-video.com/Lexique/LexiqueL.html, published Jan. 31, 2001. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160320694 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60271563 | Feb 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10469473 | US | |
Child | 11112428 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14175046 | Feb 2014 | US |
Child | 15204735 | US | |
Parent | 13757822 | Feb 2013 | US |
Child | 14175046 | US | |
Parent | 13627558 | Sep 2012 | US |
Child | 13757822 | US | |
Parent | 13440246 | Apr 2012 | US |
Child | 13627558 | US | |
Parent | 13097823 | Apr 2011 | US |
Child | 13440246 | US | |
Parent | 12855918 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 13097823 | US | |
Parent | 12410125 | Mar 2009 | US |
Child | 12855918 | US | |
Parent | 11831749 | Jul 2007 | US |
Child | 12410125 | US | |
Parent | 11702839 | Feb 2007 | US |
Child | 11831749 | US | |
Parent | 11351962 | Feb 2006 | US |
Child | 11702839 | US | |
Parent | 11112428 | Apr 2005 | US |
Child | 11351962 | US |