Patent Grant
7378571
The present invention relates to promoters and promoter control elements that are useful for modulating transcription of a desired polynucleotide. Such promoters and promoter control elements can be included in polynucleotide constructs, expression cassettes, vectors, or inserted into the chromosome or as an exogenous element, to modulate in vivo and in vitro transcription of a polynucleotide. Host cells, including plant cells, and organisms, such as regenerated plants therefrom, with desired traits or characteristics using polynucleotides comprising the promoters and promoter control elements of the present invention are also a part of the invention.
This invention relates to the field of biotechnology and, in particular, to specific promoter sequences and promoter control element sequences which are useful for the transcription of polynucleotides in a host cell or transformed host organism.
One of the primary goals of biotechnology is to obtain organisms, such as plants, mammals, yeast, and prokaryotes having particular desired characteristics or traits. Examples of these characteristic or traits abound and may include, for example, in plants, virus resistance, insect resistance, herbicide resistance, enhanced stability or additional nutritional value. Recent advances in genetic engineering have enabled researchers in the field to incorporate polynucleotide sequences into host cells to obtain the desired qualities in the organism of choice. This technology permits one or more polynucleotides from a source different than the organism of choice to be transcribed by the organism of choice. If desired, the transcription and/or translation of these new polynucleotides can be modulated in the organism to exhibit a desired characteristic or trait. Alternatively, new patterns of transcription and/or translation of polynucleotides endogenous to the organism can be produced. Both approaches can be used at the same time.
The present invention is directed to isolated polynucleotide sequences that comprise promoters and promoter control elements from plants, especially Arabidopsis thaliana, Glycine max, Oryza sativa, and Zea mays, and other promoters and promoter control elements functional in plants.
It is an object of the present invention to provide isolated polynucleotides that are promoter sequences. These promoter sequences comprise, for example,
It is another object of the present invention to provide isolated polynucleotides that are promoter control element sequences. These promoter control element sequences comprise, for example,
Promoter or promoter control element sequences of the present invention are capable of modulating preferential transcription.
In another embodiment, the present promoter control elements are capable of serving as or fulfilling the function, for example, as a core promoter, a TATA box, a polymerase binding site, an initiator site, a transcription binding site, an enhancer, an inverted repeat, a locus control region, or a scaffold/matrix attachment region.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a polynucleotide that includes at least a first and a second promoter control element. The first promoter control element is a promoter control element sequence as discussed above and the second promoter control element is heterologous to the first control element. Moreover, the first and second control elements are operably linked. Such promoters may modulate transcript levels preferentially in a tissue or under particular conditions.
In another embodiment, the present isolated polynucleotide comprises a promoter or a promoter control element as described above, wherein the promoter or promoter control element is operably linked to a polynucleotide to be transcribed.
In another embodiment of the present vector, the promoter and promoter control elements of the instant invention are operably linked to a heterologous polynucleotide that is a regulatory sequence.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a host cell comprising an isolated polynucleotide or vector as described above or fragment thereof. Host cells include, for instance, bacterial, yeast, insect, mammalian, and plant. The host cell can comprise a promoter or promoter control element exogenous to the genome. Such a promoter can modulate transcription in cis- and in trans-.
In yet another embodiment, the present host cell is a plant cell capable of regenerating into a plant.
It is yet another embodiment of the present invention to provide a plant comprising an isolated polynucleotide or vector described above.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a method of modulating transcription in a sample that contains either a cell-free system of transcription or host cell. This method comprises providing a polynucleotide or vector according to the present invention as described above, and contacting the sample of the polynucleotide or vector with conditions that permit transcription.
In another embodiment of the present method, the polynucleotide or vector preferentially modulates
(a) constitutive transcription,
(b) stress induced transcription,
(c) light induced transcription,
(d) dark induced transcription,
(e) leaf transcription,
(f) root transcription,
(g) stem or shoot transcription,
(h) silique transcription,
(i) callus transcription,
(j) flower transcription,
(k) immature bud and inflorescence specific transcription, or
(l) senescing induced transcription
(m) germination transcription.
Other and further objects of the present invention will be made clear or become apparent from the following description.
1. Definitions
Chimeric: The term “chimeric” is used to describe polynucleotides or genes, as defined supra, or constructs wherein at least two of the elements of the polynucleotide or gene or construct, such as the promoter and the polynucleotide to be transcribed and/or other regulatory sequences and/or filler sequences and/or complements thereof, are heterologous to each other.
Constitutive Promoter: Promoters referred to herein as “constitutive promoters” actively promote transcription under most, but not necessarily all, environmental conditions and states of development or cell differentiation. Examples of constitutive promoters include the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S transcript initiation region and the 1′ or 2′ promoter derived from T-DNA of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and other transcription initiation regions from various plant genes, such as the maize ubiquitin-1 promoter, known to those of skill.
Core Promoter: This is the minimal stretch of contiguous DNA sequence that is sufficient to direct accurate initiation of transcription by the RNA polymerase II machinery (for review see: Struhl, 1987, Cell 49: 295-297; Smale, 1994, In Transcription: Mechanisms and Regulation (eds R. C. Conaway and J. W. Conaway), pp 63-81/Raven Press, Ltd., New York; Smale, 1997, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1351: 73-88; Smale et al., 1998, Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 58: 21-31; Smale, 2001, Genes & Dev. 15: 2503-2508; Weis and Reinberg, 1992, FASEB J. 6: 3300-3309; Burke et al., 1998, Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol 63: 75-82). There are several sequence motifs, including the TATA box, initiator (Inr), TFIIB recognition element (BRE) and downstream core promoter element (DPE), that are commonly found in core promoters, however not all of these elements occur in all promoters and there are no universal core promoter elements (Butler and Kadonaga, 2002, Genes & Dev. 16: 2583-2592).
Domain: Domains are fingerprints or signatures that can be used to characterize protein families and/or parts of proteins. Such fingerprints or signatures can comprise conserved (1) primary sequence, (2) secondary structure, and/or (3) three-dimensional conformation. A similar analysis can be applied to polynucleotides. Generally, each domain has been associated with either a conserved primary sequence or a sequence motif. Generally these conserved primary sequence motifs have been correlated with specific in vitro and/or in vivo activities. A domain can be any length, including the entirety of the polynucleotide to be transcribed. Examples of domains include, without limitation, AP2, helicase, homeobox, zinc finger, etc.
Endogenous: The term “endogenous,” within the context of the current invention refers to any polynucleotide, polypeptide or protein sequence which is a natural part of a cell or organisms regenerated from said cell. In the context of promoter, the term “endogenous coding region” or “endogenous cDNA” refers to the coding region that is naturally operably linked to the promoter.
Enhancer/Suppressor: An “enhancer” is a DNA regulatory element that can increase the steady state level of a transcript, usually by increasing the rate of transcription initiation. Enhancers usually exert their effect regardless of the distance, upstream or downstream location, or orientation of the enhancer relative to the start site of transcription. In contrast, a “suppressor” is a corresponding DNA regulatory element that decreases the steady state level of a transcript, again usually by affecting the rate of transcription initiation. The essential activity of enhancer and suppressor elements is to bind a protein factor(s). Such binding can be assayed, for example, by methods described below. The binding is typically in a manner that influences the steady state level of a transcript in a cell or in an in vitro transcription extract.
Exogenous: As referred to within, “exogenous” is any polynucleotide, polypeptide or protein sequence, whether chimeric or not, that is introduced into the genome of a host cell or organism regenerated from said host cell by any means other than by a sexual cross. Examples of means by which this can be accomplished are described below, and include Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (of dicots—e.g. Salomon et al. EMBO J. 3:141 (1984); Herrera-Estrella et al. EMBO J. 2:987 (1983); of monocots, representative papers are those by Escudero et al., Plant J. 10:355 (1996), Ishida et al., Nature Biotechnology 14:745 (1996), May et al., Bio/Technology 13:486 (1995)), biolistic methods (Armaleo et al., Current Genetics 17:97 1990)), electroporation, in planta techniques, and the like. Such a plant containing the exogenous nucleic acid is referred to here as a T0 for the primary transgenic plant and T1 for the first generation. The term “exogenous” as used herein is also intended to encompass inserting a naturally found element into a non-naturally found location.
Gene: The term “gene,” as used in the context of the current invention, encompasses all regulatory and coding sequence contiguously associated with a single hereditary unit with a genetic function (see
Heterologous sequences: “Heterologous sequences” are those that are not operatively linked or are not contiguous to each other in nature. For example, a promoter from corn is considered heterologous to an Arabidopsis coding region sequence. Also, a promoter from a gene encoding a growth factor from corn is considered heterologous to a sequence encoding the corn receptor for the growth factor. Regulatory element sequences, such as UTRs or 3′ end termination sequences that do not originate in nature from the same gene as the coding sequence originates from, are considered heterologous to said coding sequence. Elements operatively linked in nature and contiguous to each other are not heterologous to each other.
Homologous: In the current invention, a “homologous” gene or polynucleotide or polypeptide refers to a gene or polynucleotide or polypeptide that shares sequence similarity with the gene or polynucleotide or polypeptide of interest. This similarity may be in only a fragment of the sequence and often represents a functional domain such as, examples including without limitation a DNA binding domain or a domain with tyrosine kinase activity. The functional activities of homologous polynucleotide are not necessarily the same.
Inducible Promoter: An “inducible promoter” in the context of the current invention refers to a promoter, the activity of which is influenced by certain conditions, such as light, temperature, chemical concentration, protein concentration, conditions in an organism, cell, or organelle, etc. A typical example of an inducible promoter, which can be utilized with the polynucleotides of the present invention, is PARSK1, the promoter from an Arabidopsis gene encoding a serine-threonine kinase enzyme, and which promoter is induced by dehydration, abscissic acid and sodium chloride (Wang and Goodman, Plant J. 8:37 (1995)). Examples of environmental conditions that may affect transcription by inducible promoters include anaerobic conditions, elevated temperature, the presence or absence of a nutrient or other chemical compound or the presence of light.
Modulate Transcription Level: As used herein, the phrase “modulate transcription” describes the biological activity of a promoter sequence or promoter control element. Such modulation includes, without limitation, includes up- and down-regulation of initiation of transcription, rate of transcription, and/or transcription levels.
Mutant: In the current invention, “mutant” refers to a heritable change in nucleotide sequence at a specific location. Mutant genes of the current invention may or may not have an associated identifiable phenotype.
Operable Linkage: An “operable linkage” is a linkage in which a promoter sequence or promoter control element is connected to a polynucleotide sequence (or sequences) in such a way as to place transcription of the polynucleotide sequence under the influence or control of the promoter or promoter control element. Two DNA sequences (such as a polynucleotide to be transcribed and a promoter sequence linked to the 5′ end of the polynucleotide to be transcribed) are said to be operably linked if induction of promoter function results in the transcription of mRNA encoding the polynucleotide and if the nature of the linkage between the two DNA sequences does not (1) result in the introduction of a frame-shift mutation, (2) interfere with the ability of the promoter sequence to direct the expression of the protein, antisense RNA or ribozyme, or (3) interfere with the ability of the DNA template to be transcribed. Thus, a promoter sequence would be operably linked to a polynucleotide sequence if the promoter was capable of effecting transcription of that polynucleotide sequence.
Optional Promoter Fragments: The phrase “optional promoter fragments” is used to refer to any sub-sequence of the promoter that is not required for driving transcription of an operationally linked coding region. These fragments comprise the 5′ UTR and any exon(s) of the endogenous coding region. The optional promoter fragments may also comprise any exon(s) and the 3′ or 5′ UTR of the gene residing upstream of the promoter (that is, 5′ to the promoter). Optional promoter fragments also include any intervening sequences that are introns or sequence that occurs between exons or an exon and the UTR.
Orthologous: “Orthologous” is a term used herein to describe a relationship between two or more polynucleotides or proteins. Two polynucleotides or proteins are “orthologous” to one another if they serve a similar function in different organisms. In general, orthologous polynucleotides or proteins will have similar catalytic functions (when they encode enzymes) or will serve similar structural functions (when they encode proteins or RNA that form part of the ultrastructure of a cell).
Percentage of sequence identity: “Percentage of sequence identity,” as used herein, is determined by comparing two optimally aligned sequences over a comparison window, where the fragment of the polynucleotide or amino acid sequence in the comparison window may comprise additions or deletions (e.g., gaps or overhangs) as compared to the reference sequence (which does not comprise additions or deletions) for optimal alignment of the two sequences. The percentage is calculated by determining the number of positions at which the identical nucleic acid base or amino acid residue occurs in both sequences to yield the number of matched positions, dividing the number of matched positions by the total number of positions in the window of comparison and multiplying the result by 100 to yield the percentage of sequence identity. Optimal alignment of sequences for comparison may be conducted by the local homology algorithm of Smith and Waterman Add. APL. Math. 2:482 (1981), by the homology alignment algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch J. Mol. Biol. 48:443 (1970), by the search for similarity method of Pearson and Lipman Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 85: 2444 (1988), by computerized implementations of these algorithms (GAP, BESTFIT, BLAST, PASTA, and TFASTA in the Wisconsin Genetics Software Package, Genetics Computer Group (GCG), 575 Science Dr., Madison, Wis.), or by inspection. Given that two sequences have been identified for comparison, GAP and BESTFIT are preferably employed to determine their optimal alignment. Typically, the default values of 5.00 for gap weight and 0.30 for gap weight length are used.
Plant Promoter: A “plant promoter” is a promoter capable of initiating transcription in plant cells and can modulate transcription of a polynucleotide. Such promoters need not be of plant origin. For example, promoters derived from plant viruses, such as the CaMV35S promoter or from Agrobacterium tumefaciens such as the T-DNA promoters, can be plant promoters. A typical example of a plant promoter of plant origin is the maize ubiquitin-1 (ubi-1) promoter known to those of skill.
Plant Tissue: The term “plant tissue” includes differentiated and undifferentiated tissues or plants, including but not limited to roots, stems, shoots, cotyledons, epicotyl, hypocotyl, leaves, pollen, seeds, tumor tissue and various forms of cells in culture such as single cells, protoplast, embryos, and callus tissue. The plant tissue may be in plants or in organ, tissue or cell culture.
Preferential Transcription: “Preferential transcription” is defined as transcription that occurs in a particular pattern of cell types or developmental times or in response to specific stimuli or combination thereof. Non-limitive examples of preferential transcription include: high transcript levels of a desired sequence in root tissues; detectable transcript levels of a desired sequence in certain cell types during embryogenesis; and low transcript levels of a desired sequence under drought conditions. Such preferential transcription can be determined by measuring initiation, rate, and/or levels of transcription.
Promoter: A “promoter” is a DNA sequence that directs the transcription of a polynucleotide. Typically a promoter is located in the 5′ region of a polynucleotide to be transcribed, proximal to the transcriptional start site of such polynucleotide. More typically, promoters are defined as the region upstream of the first exon; more typically, as a region upstream of the first of multiple transcription start sites; more typically, as the region downstream of the preceding gene and upstream of the first of multiple transcription start sites; more typically, the region downstream of the polyA signal and upstream of the first of multiple transcription start sites; even more typically, about 3,000 nucleotides upstream of the ATG of the first exon; even more typically, 2,000 nucleotides upstream of the first of multiple transcription start sites. The promoters of the invention comprise at least a core promoter as defined above. Frequently promoters are capable of directing transcription of genes located on each of the complementary DNA strands that are 3′ to the promoter. Stated differently, many promoters exhibit bidirectionality and can direct transcription of a downstream gene when present in either orientation (i.e. 5′ to 3′ or 3′ to 5′ relative to the coding region of the gene). Additionally, the promoter may also include at least one control element such as an upstream element. Such elements include UARs and optionally, other DNA sequences that affect transcription of a polynucleotide such as a synthetic upstream element.
Promoter Control Element: The term “promoter control element” as used herein describes elements that influence the activity of the promoter. Promoter control elements include transcriptional regulatory sequence determinants such as, but not limited to, enhancers, scaffold/matrix attachment regions, TATA boxes, transcription start locus control regions, UARs, URRs, other transcription factor binding sites and inverted repeats.
Public sequence: The term “public sequence,” as used in the context of the instant application, refers to any sequence that has been deposited in a publicly accessible database prior to the filing date of the present application. This term encompasses both amino acid and nucleotide sequences. Such sequences are publicly accessible, for example, on the BLAST databases on the NCBI FTP web site (accessible via the internet). The database at the NCBI FTP site utilizes “gi” numbers assigned by NCBI as a unique identifier for each sequence in the databases, thereby providing a non-redundant database for sequence from various databases, including GenBank, EMBL, DBBJ, (DNA Database of Japan) and PDB (Brookhaven Protein Data Bank).
Regulatory Sequence: The term “regulatory sequence,” as used in the current invention, refers to any nucleotide sequence that influences transcription or translation initiation and rate, or stability and/or mobility of a transcript or polypeptide product. Regulatory sequences include, but are not limited to, promoters, promoter control elements, protein binding sequences, 5′ and 3′ UTRs, transcriptional start sites, termination sequences, polyadenylation sequences, introns, certain sequences within amino acid coding sequences such as secretory signals, protease cleavage sites, etc.
Related Sequences: “Related sequences” refer to either a polypeptide or a nucleotide sequence that exhibits some degree of sequence similarity with a reference sequence.
Specific Promoters: In the context of the current invention, “specific promoters” refers to a subset of promoters that have a high preference for modulating transcript levels in a specific tissue or organ or cell and/or at a specific time during development of an organism. By “high preference” is meant at least 3-fold, preferably 5-fold, more preferably at least 10-fold still more preferably at least 20-fold, 50-fold or 100-fold increase in transcript levels under the specific condition over the transcription under any other reference condition considered. Typical examples of temporal and/or tissue or organ specific promoters of plant origin that can be used with the polynucleotides of the present invention, are: PTA29, a promoter which is capable of driving gene transcription specifically in tapetum and only during anther development (Koltonow et al., Plant Cell 2:1201 (1990); RCc2 and RCc3, promoters that direct root-specific gene transcription in rice (Xu et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 27:237 (1995); TobRB27, a root-specific promoter from tobacco (Yamamoto et al., Plant Cell 3:371 (1991)). Examples of tissue-specific promoters under developmental control include promoters that initiate transcription only in certain tissues or organs, such as root, ovule, fruit, seeds, or flowers. Other specific promoters include those from genes encoding seed storage proteins or the lipid body membrane protein, oleosin. A few root-specific promoters are noted above. See also “Preferential transcription”.
Stringency: “Stringency” as used herein is a function of probe length, probe composition (G+C content), and salt concentration, organic solvent concentration, and temperature of hybridization or wash conditions. Stringency is typically compared by the parameter Tm, which is the temperature at which 50% of the complementary molecules in the hybridization are hybridized, in terms of a temperature differential from Tm. High stringency conditions are those providing a condition of Tm−5° C. to Tm−10° C. Medium or moderate stringency conditions are those providing Tm−20° C. to Tm−29° C. Low stringency conditions are those providing a condition of Tm−40° C. to Tm−48° C. The relationship of hybridization conditions to Tm (in ° C.) is expressed in the mathematical equation
Tm=81.5−16.6(log10[Na+])+0.41(% G+C)−(600/N) (1)
where N is the length of the probe. This equation works well for probes 14 to 70 nucleotides in length that are identical to the target sequence. The equation below for Tm of DNA-DNA hybrids is useful for probes in the range of 50 to greater than 500 nucleotides, and for conditions that include an organic solvent (formamide).
Tm=81.5+16.6 log {[Na+]/(1+0.7[Na+])}+0.41(% G+C)−500/L 0.63(% formamide) (2)
where L is the length of the probe in the hybrid. (P. Tijessen, “Hybridization with Nucleic Acid Probes” in Laboratory Techniques in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, P. C. vand der Vliet, ed., c. 1993 by Elsevier, Amsterdam.) The Tm of equation (2) is affected by the nature of the hybrid; for DNA-RNA hybrids Tm is 10-15° C. higher than calculated, for RNA-RNA hybrids Tm is 20-25° C. higher. Because the Tm decreases about 1° C. for each 1% decrease in homology when a long probe is used (Bonner et al., J. Mol. Biol. 81:123 (1973)), stringency conditions can be adjusted to favor detection of identical genes or related family members.
Equation (2) is derived assuming equilibrium and therefore, hybridizations according to the present invention are most preferably performed under conditions of probe excess and for sufficient time to achieve equilibrium. The time required to reach equilibrium can be shortened by inclusion of a hybridization accelerator such as dextran sulfate or another high volume polymer in the hybridization buffer.
Stringency can be controlled during the hybridization reaction or after hybridization has occurred by altering the salt and temperature conditions of the wash solutions used. The formulas shown above are equally valid when used to compute the stringency of a wash solution. Preferred wash solution stringencies lie within the ranges stated above; high stringency is 5-8° C. below Tm, medium or moderate stringency is 26-29° C. below Tm and low stringency is 45-48° C. below Tm.
Substantially free of: A composition containing A is “substantially free of” B when at least 85% by weight of the total A+B in the composition is A. Preferably, A comprises at least about 90% by weight of the total of A+B in the composition, more preferably at least about 95% or even 99% by weight. For example, a plant gene can be substantially free of other plant genes. Other examples include, but are not limited to, ligands substantially free of receptors (and vice versa), a growth factor substantially free of other growth factors and a transcription binding factor substantially free of nucleic acids.
Suppressor: See “Enhancer/Suppressor”
TATA to start: “TATA to start” shall mean the distance, in number of nucleotides, between the primary TATA motif and the start of transcription.
Transgenic plant: A “transgenic plant” is a plant having one or more plant cells that contain at least one exogenous polynucleotide introduced by recombinant nucleic acid methods.
Translational start site: In the context of the present invention, a “translational start site” is usually an ATG or AUG in a transcript, often the first ATG or AUG. A single protein encoding transcript, however, may have multiple translational start sites.
Transcription start site: “Transcription start site” is used in the current invention to describe the point at which transcription is initiated. This point is typically located about 25 nucleotides downstream from a TFIID binding site, such as a TATA box. Transcription can initiate at one or more sites within the gene, and a single polynucleotide to be transcribed may have multiple transcriptional start sites, some of which may be specific for transcription in a particular cell-type or tissue or organ. “+1” is stated relative to the transcription start site and indicates the first nucleotide in a transcript.
Upstream Activating Region (UAR): An “Upstream Activating Region” or “UAR” is a position or orientation dependent nucleic acid element that primarily directs tissue, organ, cell type, or environmental regulation of transcript level, usually by affecting the rate of transcription initiation. Corresponding DNA elements that have a transcription inhibitory effect are called herein “Upstream Repressor Regions” or “URR”s. The essential activity of these elements is to bind a protein factor. Such binding can be assayed by methods described below. The binding is typically in a manner that influences the steady state level of a transcript in a cell or in vitro transcription extract.
Untranslated region (UTR): A “UTR” is any contiguous series of nucleotide bases that is transcribed, but is not translated. A 5′ UTR lies between the start site of the transcript and the translation initiation codon and includes the +1 nucleotide. A 3′ UTR lies between the translation termination codon and the end of the transcript. UTRs can have particular functions such as increasing mRNA message stability or translation attenuation. Examples of 3′ UTRs include, but are not limited to polyadenylation signals and transcription termination sequences.
Variant: The term “variant” is used herein to denote a polypeptide or protein or polynucleotide molecule that differs from others of its kind in some way. For example, polypeptide and protein variants can consist of changes in amino acid sequence and/or charge and/or post-translational modifications (such as glycosylation, etc). Likewise, polynucleotide variants can consist of changes that add or delete a specific UTR or exon sequence. It will be understood that there may be sequence variations within sequence or fragments used or disclosed in this application. Preferably, variants will be such that the sequences have at least 80%, preferably at least 90%, 95, 97, 98, or 99% sequence identity. Variants preferably measure the primary biological function of the native polypeptide or protein or polynucleotide.
2. Introduction
The polynucleotides of the invention comprise promoters and promoter control elements that are capable of modulating transcription.
Such promoters and promoter control elements can be used in combination with native or heterologous promoter fragments, control elements or other regulatory sequences to modulate transcription and/or translation.
Specifically, promoters and control elements of the invention can be used to modulate transcription of a desired polynucleotide, which includes without limitation:
In an organism, such as a plant, the promoters and promoter control elements of the instant invention are useful to produce preferential transcription which results in a desired pattern of transcript levels in a particular cells, tissues, or organs, or under particular conditions.
3. Table of Contents
The following description of the present invention is outlined in the following table of contents.
A. Identifying and Isolating Promoter Sequences of the Invention
B. Isolating Related Promoter Sequences
C. Promoter Control Elements of the Invention
D. Constructing Promoters and Control Elements
E. Vectors
F. Insertion of Polynucleotides and Vectors Into a Host Cell
G. Utility
A. Identiying and Isolating Promoter Sequences of the Invention
The promoters and promoter control elements of the present invention are presented in SEQ ID NOs: 1-46 and were identified from Arabidopsis thaliana or Oryza sativa. Additional promoter sequences encompassed by the invention can be identified as described below.
(1) Cloning Methods
Isolation from genomic libraries of polynucleotides comprising the sequences of the promoters and promoter control elements of the present invention is possible using known techniques.
For example, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can amplify the desired polynucleotides utilizing primers designed from sequences in the row titled “The spatial expression of the promoter-marker-vector”. Polynucleotide libraries comprising genomic sequences can be constructed according to Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed. (1989) Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), for example.
Other procedures for isolating polynucleotides comprising the promoter sequences of the invention include, without limitation, tail-PCR, and 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). See, for tail-PCR, for example, Liu et al., Plant J 8(3): 457-463 (September, 1995); Liu et al., Genomics 25: 674-681 (1995); Liu et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 21(14): 3333-3334 (1993); and Zoe et al., BioTechniques 27(2): 240-248 (1999); for RACE, see, for example, PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, (1990) Academic Press, Inc.
(2) Chemical Synthesis
In addition, the promoters and promoter control elements described in SEQ ID NOs: 1-46 can be chemically synthesized according to techniques in common use. See, for example, Beaucage et al., Tet. Lett. (1981) 22: 1859 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,668,777.
Such chemical oligonucleotide synthesis can be carried out using commercially available devices, such as, Biosearch 4600 or 8600 DNA synthesizer, by Applied Biosystems, a division of Perkin-Elmer Corp., Foster City, Calif., USA; and Expedite by Perceptive Biosystems, Framingham, Mass., USA.
Synthetic RNA, including natural and/or analog building blocks, can be synthesized on the Biosearch 8600 machines, see above.
Oligonucleotides can be synthesized and then ligated together to construct the desired polynucleotide.
B. Isolating Related Promoter Sequences
Included in the present invention are promoter and promoter control elements that are related to those described in SEQ ID NOs: 1-46. Such a related sequence can be isolated utilizing
(a) nucleotide sequence identity;
(b) coding sequence identity; or
(c) common function or gene products.
Relatives can include both naturally occurring promoters and non-natural promoter sequences. Non-natural related promoters include nucleotide substitutions, insertions or deletions of naturally-occurring promoter sequences that do not substantially affect transcription modulation activity. For example, the binding of relevant DNA binding proteins can still occur with the non-natural promoter sequences and promoter control elements of the present invention.
According to current knowledge, promoter sequences and promoter control elements exist as functionally important regions, such as protein binding sites, and spacer regions. These spacer regions are apparently required for proper positioning of the protein binding sites. Thus, nucleotide substitutions, insertions and deletions can be tolerated in these spacer regions to a certain degree without loss of function.
In contrast, less variation is permissible in the functionally important regions, since changes in the sequence can interfere with protein binding. Nonetheless, some variation in the functionally important regions is permissible so long as function is conserved.
The effects of substitutions, insertions and deletions to the promoter sequences or promoter control elements may be to increase or decrease the binding of relevant DNA binding proteins to modulate transcript levels of a polynucleotide to be transcribed. Effects may include tissue-specific or condition-specific modulation of transcript levels of the polypeptide to be transcribed. Polynucleotides representing changes to the nucleotide sequence of the DNA-protein contact region by insertion of additional nucleotides, changes to identity of relevant nucleotides, including use of chemically-modified bases, or deletion of one or more nucleotides are considered encompassed by the present invention.
(1) Relatives Based on Nucleotide Sequence Identity
Included in the present invention are promoters exhibiting nucleotide sequence identity to those described in SEQ ID NOs: 1-46.
Typically, such related promoters exhibit at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85%, more preferably at least 90%, and most preferably at least 95%, even more preferably, at least 96%, 97%, 98% or 99% sequence identity compared to those shown in SEQ ID NOs: 1-46. Such sequence identity can be calculated by the algorithms and computers programs described above.
Usually, such sequence identity is exhibited in an alignment region that is at least 75% of the length of a sequence shown in SEQ ID NOs: 1-46; more usually at least 80%; more usually, at least 85%, more usually at least 90%, and most usually at least 95%, even more usually, at least 96%, 97%, 98% or 99% of the length of a sequence shown in Table 1 in the section entitled “The predicted promoter sequence”.
The percentage of the alignment length is calculated by counting the number of residues of the sequence in region of strongest alignment, e.g., a continuous region of the sequence that contains the greatest number of residues that are identical to the residues between two sequences that are being aligned. The number of residues in the region of strongest alignment is divided by the total residue length of a sequence in SEQ ID NOs: 1-46.
These related promoters may exhibit similar preferential transcription as those promoters described in Table 1 in the section entitled “The predicted promoter sequence”.
Construction of Polynucleotides
Naturally occurring promoters that exhibit nucleotide sequence identity to those shown in SEQ ID NOs: 1-46 can be isolated using the techniques as described above. More specifically, such related promoters can be identified by varying stringencies, as defined above, in typical hybridization procedures such as Southern blots or probing of polynucleotide libraries, for example.
Non-natural promoter variants of those shown in SEQ ID NOs: 1-46 can be constructed using cloning methods that incorporate the desired nucleotide variation. See, for example, Ho, S. N., et al. Gene 77:51-59 1989, describing a procedure site directed mutagenesis using PCR.
Any related promoter showing sequence identity to those shown in Table can be chemically synthesized as described above.
Also, the present invention includes non-natural promoters that exhibit the above-sequence identity to those in SEQ ID NOs: 1-46.
The promoters and promoter control elements of the present invention may also be synthesized with 5′ or 3′ extensions, to facilitate additional manipulation, for instance.
Testing of Polynucleotides
Polynucleotides of the invention were tested for activity by cloning the sequence into an appropriate vector, transforming plants with the construct and assaying for marker gene expression. Recombinant DNA constructs were prepared which comprise the polynucleotide sequences of the invention inserted into a vector suitable for transformation of plant cells. The construct can be made using standard recombinant DNA techniques (Sambrook et al. 1989) and can be introduced to the species of interest by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation or by other means of transformation as referenced below.
The vector backbone can be any of those typical in the art such as plasmids, viruses, artificial chromosomes, BACs, YACs and PACs and vectors of the sort described by
Typically, the construct comprises a vector containing a sequence of the present invention operationally linked to any marker gene. The polynucleotide was identified as a promoter by the expression of the marker gene. Although many marker genes can be used, Green Fluroescent Protein (GFP) is preferred. The vector may also comprise a marker gene that confers a selectable phenotype on plant cells. The marker may encode biocide resistance, particularly antibiotic resistance, such as resistance to kanamycin, G418, bleomycin, hygromycin, or herbicide resistance, such as resistance to chlorosulfuron or phosphinotricin. Vectors can also include origins of replication, scaffold attachment regions (SARs), markers, homologous sequences, introns, etc.
C. Promoter Control Elements of the Invention
The promoter control elements of the present invention include those that comprise a sequence shown in SEQ ID NOs: 1-46 and fragments thereof. The size of the fragments can range from 5 bases to 10 kilobases (kb). Typically, the fragment size is no smaller than 8 bases; more typically, no smaller than 12; more typically, no smaller than 15 bases; more typically, no smaller than 20 bases; more typically, no smaller than 25 bases; even more typically, no more than 30, 35, 40 or 50 bases.
Usually, the fragment size in no larger than 5 kb bases; more usually, no larger than 2 kb; more usually, no larger than 1 kb; more usually, no larger than 800 bases; more usually, no larger than 500 bases; even more usually, no more than 250, 200, 150 or 100 bases.
(1) Promoter Control Element Configuration
A common configuration of the promoter control elements in RNA polymerase II promoters can be found in “Models for prediction and recognition of eukaryotic promoters”, T. Werner, Mammalian Genome, 10, 168-175 (1999).
Promoters are generally modular in nature. Promoters can consist of a basal promoter which functions as a site for assembly of a transcription complex comprising an RNA polymerase, for example RNA polymerase II. A typical transcription complex will include additional factors such as TFIIB, TFIID, and TFIIE. Of these, TFIID appears to be the only one to bind DNA directly. The promoter might also contain one or more promoter control elements such as the elements discussed above. These additional control elements may function as binding sites for additional transcription factors that have the function of modulating the level of transcription with respect to tissue specificity and of transcriptional responses to particular environmental or nutritional factors, and the like.
One type of promoter control element is a polynucleotide sequence representing a binding site for proteins. Typically, within a particular functional module, protein binding sites constitute regions of 5 to 60, preferably 10 to 30, more preferably 10 to 20 nucleotides. Within such binding sites, there are typically 2 to 6 nucleotides which specifically contact amino acids of the nucleic acid binding protein.
The protein binding sites are usually separated from each other by 10 to several hundred nucleotides, typically by 15 to 150 nucleotides, often by 20 to 50 nucleotides.
Further, protein binding sites in promoter control elements often display dyad symmetry in their sequence. Such elements can bind several different proteins, and/or a plurality of sites can bind the same protein. Both types of elements may be combined in a region of 50 to 1,000 base pairs.
Binding sites for any specific factor have been known to occur almost anywhere in a promoter. For example, functional AP-1 binding sites can be located far upstream, as in the rat bone sialoprotein gene, where an AP-1 site located about 900 nucleotides upstream of the transcription start site suppresses expression. Yamauchi et al., Matrix Biol., 15, 119-130 (1996). Alternatively, an AP-1 site located close to the transcription start site plays an important role in the expression of Moloney murine leukemia virus. Sap et al., Nature, 340, 242-244, (1989).
(2) Those Identifiable by Bioinformatics
Promoter control elements from the promoters of the instant invention can be identified utilizing bioinformatic or computer driven techniques.
One method uses a computer program AlignACE to identify regulatory motifs in genes that exhibit common preferential transcription across a number of time points. The program identifies common sequence motifs in such genes. See, Roth et al., Nature Biotechnol. 16: 949-945 (1998); Tavazoie et al., Nat Genet 1999 Jul;22(3):281-5;
Genomatix, also makes available a GEMS Launcher program and other programs to identify promoter control elements and configuration of such elements. Genomatix is located in Munich, Germany.
Other references also describe detection of promoter modules by models independent of overall nucleotide sequence similarity. See, for instance, Klingenhoff et al., Bioinformatics 15, 180-186 (1999).
Protein binding sites of promoters can be identified as reported in “Computer-assisted prediction, classification, and delimination of protein binding sites in nucleic acids”, Frech, et al., Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 21, No. 7, 1655-1664, 1993.
Other programs used to identify protein binding sites include, for example, Signal Scan, Prestridge et al., Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12: 157-160 (1996); Matrix Search, Chen et al., Comput. Appl. Biosci. 11: 563-566 (1995), available as part of Signal Scan 4.0; MatInspector, Ghosh et al., Nucl. Acid Res. 21: 3117-3118 (1993) available via the internet and ConsInspector, Frech et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 21: 1655-1664 (1993), available via the internet; TFSearch; and TESS.
Frech et al., “Software for the analysis of DNA sequence elements of transcription”, Bioinformatics & Sequence Analysis, Vol. 13, no. 1, 89-97 (1997) is a review of different software for analysis of promoter control elements. This paper also reports the usefulness of matrix-based approaches to yield more specific results.
For other procedures, see, Fickett et al., Curr. Op. Biotechnol. 11: 19-24 (2000); and Quandt et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 4878-4884 (1995).
(3) Those Identifiable by In-Vitro and In-Vivo Assays
Promoter control elements also can be identified with in-vitro assays, such as transcription detection methods; and with in-vivo assays, such as enhancer trapping protocols.
In-Vitro Assays
Examples of in-vitro assays include detection of binding of protein factors that bind promoter control elements. Fragments of the instant promoters can be used to identify the location of promoter control elements. Another option for obtaining a promoter control element with desired properties is to modify known promoter sequences. This is based on the fact that the function of a promoter is dependent on the interplay of regulatory proteins that bind to specific, discrete nucleotide sequences in the promoter, termed motifs. Such interplay subsequently affects the general transcription machinery and regulates transcription efficiency. These proteins are positive regulators or negative regulators (repressors), and one protein can have a dual role depending on the context (Johnson, P. F. and McKnight, S. L. (1989) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 58:799-839).
One type of in-vitro assay utilizes a known DNA binding factor to isolate DNA fragments that bind. If a fragment or promoter variant does not bind, then a promoter control element has been removed or disrupted. For specific assays, see, for instance, B. Luo et al., J. Mol. Biol. 266:470 (1997), S. Chusacultanachai et al., J. Biol. Chem. 274:23591 (1999), D. Fabbro et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 213:781 (1995)).
Alternatively, a fragment of DNA suspected of conferring a particular pattern of specificity can be examined for activity in binding transcription factors involved in that specificity by methods such as DNA footprinting (e.g. D. J. Cousins et al., Immunology 99:101 (2000); V. Kolla et a., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 266:5 (1999)) or “mobility-shift” assays (E. D. Fabiani et al., J. Biochem. 347:147 (2000); N. Sugiura et al., J. Biochem 347:155 (2000)) or fluorescence polarization (e.g. Royer et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,445,935). Both mobility shift and DNA footprinting assays can also be used to identify portions of large DNA fragments that are bound by proteins in unpurified transcription extracts prepared from tissues or organs of interest.
Cell-free transcription extracts can be prepared and used to directly assay in a reconstitutable system (Narayan et al., Biochemistry 39:818 (2000)).
In-Vivo Assays
Promoter control elements can be identified with reporter genes in in-vivo assays with the use of fragments of the instant promoters or variants of the instant promoter polynucleotides.
For example, various fragments can be inserted into a vector, comprising a basal or “core” promoter, for example, operably linked to a reporter sequence, which, when transcribed, can produce a detectable label. Examples of reporter genes include those encoding luciferase, green fluorescent protein, GUS, neo, cat and bar. Alternatively, reporter sequence can be detected utilizing AFLP and microarray techniques.
In promoter probe vector systems, genomic DNA fragments are inserted upstream of the coding sequence of a reporter gene that is expressed only when the cloned fragment contains DNA having transcription modulation activity (Neve, R. L. et al. (1979) Nature 277:324-325). Control elements are disrupted when fragments or variants lacking any transcription modulation activity. Probe vectors have been designed for assaying transcription modulation in E. coli (An, G. et al. (1979) J. Bact. 140:400-407) and other bacterial hosts (Band, L. et al. (1983) Gene 26:313-315; Achen, M. G., Gene 45:45-49 (1986)), yeast (Goodey, A. R. et al. (1986) Mol. Gen. Genet. 204:505-511) and mammalian cells (Pater, M. M. et al. (1984) J. Mol. App. Gen. 2:363-371).
A different design of a promoter/control element trap includes packaging into retroviruses for more efficient delivery into cells. One type of retroviral enhancer trap was described by von Melchner et al. (Genes Dev. 1992; U.S. Pat. No. 5,364,783). The basic design of this vector includes a reporter protein coding sequence engineered into the U3 portion of the 3′ LTR. No splice acceptor consensus sequences are included, limiting its utility to work as an enhancer trap only. A different approach to a gene trap using retroviral vectors was pursued by Friedrich and Soriano (Genes Dev. 1991), who engineered a lacZ-neo fusion protein linked to a splicing acceptor. LacZ-neo fusion protein expression from trapped loci allows not only for drug selection, but also for visualization of β-galatactosidase expression using the chromogenic substrate, X-gal.
A general review of tools for identifying transcriptional regulatory regions of genomic DNA is provided by J. W. Fickett et al. (2000) (Curr. Opn. Biotechnol. 11:19).
(4) Non-Natural Control Elements
Non-natural control elements can be constructed by inserting, deleting or substituting nucleotides into the promoter control elements described above. Such control elements are capable of transcription modulation that can be determined using any of the assays described above.
D. Constructing Promoters with Control Elements
(1) Combining Promoters and Promoter Control Elements
The promoter polynucleotides and promoter control elements of the present invention, both naturally occurring and synthetic, can be combined with each other to produce the desired preferential transcription. Also, the polynucleotides of the invention can be combined with other known sequences to obtain other useful promoters to modulate, for example, tissue transcription specific or transcription specific to certain conditions. Such preferential transcription can be determined using the techniques or assays described above.
Fragments, variants, as well as the full-length sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 1-46 and relatives are useful alone or in combination.
The location and relation of promoter control elements within a promoter can affect the ability of the promoter to modulate transcription. The order and spacing of control elements is a factor when constructing promoters.
(2) Number of Promoter Control Elements
Promoters can contain any number of control elements. For example, a promoter can contain multiple transcription binding sites or other control elements. One element may confer tissue or organ specificity; another element may limit transcription to specific time periods, etc. Typically, promoters will contain at least a basal or core promoter as described above. Any additional element can be included as desired. For example, a fragment comprising a basal or “core” promoter can be fused with another fragment with any number of additional control elements.
(3) Spacing Between Control Elements
Spacing between control elements or the configuration or control elements can be determined or optimized to permit the desired protein-polynucleotide or polynucleotide interactions to occur.
For example, if two transcription factors bind to a promoter simultaneously or relatively close in time, the binding sites are spaced to allow each factor to bind without steric hinderance. The spacing between two such hybridizing control elements can be as small as a profile of a protein bound to a control element. In some cases, two protein binding sites can be adjacent to each other when the proteins bind at different times during the transcription process.
Further, when two control elements hybridize the spacing between such elements will be sufficient to allow the promoter polynucleotide to hairpin or loop to permit the two elements to bind. The spacing between two such hybridizing control elements can be as small as a t-RNA loop, to as large as 10 kb.
Typically, the spacing is no smaller than 5 bases; more typically, no smaller than 8; more typically, no smaller than 15 bases; more typically, no smaller than 20 bases; more typically, no smaller than 25 bases; even more typically, no more than 30, 35, 40 or 50 bases.
Usually, the fragment size in no larger than 5 kb bases; more usually, no larger than 2 kb; more usually, no larger than 1 kb; more usually, no larger than 800 bases; more usually, no larger than 500 bases; even more usually, no more than 250, 200, 150 or 100 bases.
Such spacing between promoter control elements can be determined using the techniques and assays described above.
(4) Other Promoters
The following are promoters are induced under stress conditions and can be combined with those of the present invention: ldh1 (oxygen stress; tomato; see Germain and Ricard. 1997. Plant Mol Biol 35:949-54), GPx and CAT (oxygen stress; mouse; see Franco et al. (1999) Free Radic Biol Med 27:1122-32), ci7 (cold stress; potato; see Kirch et al. (1997) Plant Mol Biol. 33:897-909), Bz2 (heavy metals; maize; see Marrs and Walbot (1997) Plant Physiol 113:93-102), HSP32 (hyperthermia; rat; see Raju and Maines (1994) Biochim Biophys Acta 1217:273-80); MAPKAPK-2 (heat shock; Drosophila; see Larochelle and Suter (1995) Gene 163:209-14).
In addition, the following examples of promoters are induced by the presence or absence of light can be used in combination with those of the present invention: Topoisomerase II (pea; see Reddy et al. (1999) Plant Mol Biol 41:125-37), chalcone synthase (soybean; see Wingender et al. (1989) Mol Gen Genet 218:315-22) mdm2 gene (human tumor; see Saucedo et al. (1998) Cell Growth Differ 9:119-30), Clock and BMAL1 (rat; see Namihira et al. (1999) Neurosci Lett 271:1-4, PHYA (Arabidopsis; see Canton and Quail (1999) Plant Physiol 121:1207-16), PRB-1b (tobacco; see Sessa et al. (1995) Plant Mol Biol 28:537-47) and Ypr10 (common bean; see Walter et al. (1996) Eur J Biochem 239:281-93).
The promoters and control elements of the following genes can be used in combination with the present invention to confer tissue specificity: MipB (iceplant; Yamada et al. (1995) Plant Cell 7:1129-42) and SUCS (root nodules; broadbean; Kuster et al. (1993) Mol Plant Microbe Interact 6:507-14) for roots, OsSUT1 (rice ; Hirose et al. (1997) Plant Cell Physiol 38:1389-96) for leaves, Msg (soybean; Stomvik et al. (1999) Plant Mol Biol 41:217-31) for siliques, cell (Arabidopsis; Shani et al. (1997) Plant Mol Biol 34(6):837-42) and ACT111 (Arabidopsis; Huang et al. (1997) Plant Mol Biol 33:125-39) for inflorescence.
Still other promoters are affected by hormones or participate in specific physiological processes, which can be used in combination with those of present invention. Some examples are the ACC synthase gene that is induced differently by ethylene and brassinosteroids (mung bean; Yi et al. (1999) Plant Mol Biol 41:443-54), the TAPG1 gene that is active during abscission (tomato; Kalaitzis et al. (1995) Plant Mol Biol 28:647-56), and the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase gene (carnation; Jones et al. (1995) Plant Mol Biol 28:505-12) and the CP-2/cathepsin L gene (rat; Kim and Wright (1997) Biol Reprod 57:1467-77), both active during senescence.
E. Vectors
Vectors are a useful component of the present invention. In particular, the present promoters and/or promoter control elements may be delivered to a system such as a cell by way of a vector. For the purposes of this invention, such delivery may range from simply introducing the promoter or promoter control element by itself randomly into a cell to integration of a cloning vector containing the present promoter or promoter control element. Thus, a vector need not be limited to a DNA molecule such as a plasmid, cosmid or bacterial phage that has the capability of replicating autonomously in a host cell. All other manner of delivery of the promoters and promoter control elements of the invention are envisioned. The various T-DNA vector types are a preferred vector for use with the present invention. Many useful vectors are commercially available.
It may also be useful to attach a marker sequence to the present promoter and promoter control element in order to determine activity of such sequences. Marker sequences typically include genes that provide antibiotic resistance, such as tetracycline resistance, hygromycin resistance or ampicillin resistance, or provide herbicide resistance. Specific selectable marker genes may be used to confer resistance to herbicides such as glyphosate, glufosinate or broxynil (Comai et al. (1985) Nature 317: 741-744; Gordon-Kamm et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618; and Stalker et al. (1988) Science 242: 419-423). Other marker genes exist which provide hormone responsiveness.
(1) Modification of Transcription by Promoters and Promoter Control Elements
The promoter or promoter control element of the present invention may be operably linked to a polynucleotide to be transcribed. In this manner, the promoter or promoter control element may modify transcription by modulate transcript levels of that polynucleotide when inserted into a genome.
However, prior to insertion into a genome, the promoter or promoter control element need not be linked, operably or otherwise, to a polynucleotide to be transcribed. For example, the promoter or promoter control element may be inserted alone into the genome in front of a polynucleotide already present in the genome. In this manner, the promoter or promoter control element may modulate the transcription of a polynucleotide that was already present in the genome. This polynucleotide may be native to the genome or inserted at an earlier time.
Alternatively, the promoter or promoter control element may be inserted into a genome alone to modulate transcription. See, for example, Vaucheret, H et al. (1998) Plant J 16: 651-659. Rather, the promoter or promoter control element may be simply inserted into a genome or maintained extrachromosomally as a way to divert transcription resources of the system to itself. This approach may be used to downregulate the transcript levels of a group of polynucleotide(s).
(2) Polynucleotide to Be Transcribed
The nature of the polynucleotide to be transcribed is not limited. Specifically, the polynucleotide may include sequences that will have activity as RNA as well as sequences that result in a polypeptide product. These sequences may include, but are not limited to antisense sequences, ribozyme sequences, spliceosomes, amino acid coding sequences, and fragments thereof.
Specific coding sequences may include, but are not limited to endogenous proteins or fragments thereof, or heterologous proteins including marker genes or fragments thereof.
Promoters and control elements of the present invention are useful for modulating metabolic or catabolic processes. Such processes include, but are not limited to, secondary product metabolism, amino acid synthesis, seed protein storage, oil development, pest defense and nitrogen usage. Some examples of genes, transcripts and peptides or polypeptides participating in these processes, which can be modulated by the present invention: are tryptophan decarboxylase (tdc) and strictosidine synthase (str1), dihydrodipicolinate synthase (DHDPS) and aspartate kinase (AK), 2S albumin and alpha-, beta-, and gamma-zeins, ricinoleate and 3-ketoacyl-ACP synthase (KAS), Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) insecticidal protein, cowpea trypsin inhibitor (CpTI), asparagine synthetase and nitrite reductase. Alternatively, expression constructs can be used to inhibit expression of these peptides and polypeptides by incorporating the promoters in constructs for antisense use, co-suppression use or for the production of dominant negative mutations.
(3) Other Regulatory Elements
As explained above, several types of regulatory elements exist concerning transcription regulation. Each of these regulatory elements may be combined with the present vector if desired.
(4) Other Components of Vectors
Translation of eukaryotic mRNA is often initiated at the codon that encodes the first methionine. Thus, when constructing a recombinant polynucleotide according to the present invention for expressing a protein product, it is preferable to ensure that the linkage between the 3′ portion, preferably including the TATA box, of the promoter and the polynucleotide to be transcribed, or a functional derivative thereof, does not contain any intervening codons which are capable of encoding a methionine.
The vector of the present invention may contain additional components. For example, an origin of replication allows for replication of the vector in a host cell. Additionally, homologous sequences flanking a specific sequence allows for specific recombination of the specific sequence at a desired location in the target genome. T-DNA sequences also allow for insertion of a specific sequence randomly into a target genome.
The vector may also be provided with a plurality of restriction sites for insertion of a polynucleotide to be transcribed as well as the promoter and/or promoter control elements of the present invention. The vector may additionally contain selectable marker genes. The vector may also contain a transcriptional and translational initiation region, and a transcriptional and translational termination region functional in the host cell. The termination region may be native with the transcriptional initiation region, may be native with the polynucleotide to be transcribed, or may be derived from another source. Convenient termination regions are available from the Ti-plasmid of A. tumefaciens, such as the octopine synthase and nopaline synthase termination regions. See also, Guerineau et al., (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 262:141-144; Proudfoot (1991) Cell 64:671-674; Sanfacon et al. (1991) Genes Dev. 5:141-149; Mogen et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2:1261-1272; Munroe et al. (1990) Gene 91:151-158; Ballas et al. 1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17:7891-7903; Joshi et al. (1987) Nucleic Acid Res. 15:9627-9639.
Where appropriate, the polynucleotide to be transcribed may be optimized for increased expression in a certain host cell. For example, the polynucleotide can be synthesized using preferred codons for improved transcription and translation. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,380,831 and 5,436,391; see also and Murray et al., (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17:477-498.
Additional sequence modifications include elimination of sequences encoding spurious polyadenylation signals, exon intron splice site signals, transposon-like repeats, and other such sequences well characterized as deleterious to expression. The G-C content of the polynucleotide may be adjusted to levels average for a given cellular host, as calculated by reference to known genes expressed in the host cell. The polynucleotide sequence may be modified to avoid hairpin secondary mRNA structures.
A general description of expression vectors and reporter genes can be found in Gruber et al., “Vectors for Plant Transformation, in Methods in Plant Molecular Biology & Biotechnology” in Glich et al., (Eds. pp. 89-119, CRC Press, 1993). Moreover GUS expression vectors and GUS gene cassettes are available from Clonetech Laboratories, Inc., Palo Alto, Calif. while luciferase expression vectors and luciferase gene cassettes are available from Promega Corp. (Madison, Wis.). GFP vectors are available from Aurora Biosciences.
F. Polynucleotide Insertion into a Host Cell
The polynucleotides according to the present invention can be inserted into a host cell. A host cell includes but is not limited to a plant, mammalian, insect, yeast, and prokaryotic cell, preferably a plant cell.
The method of insertion into the host cell genome is chosen based on convenience. For example, the insertion into the host cell genome may either be accomplished by vectors that integrate into the host cell genome or by vectors which exist independent of the host cell genome.
(1) Polynucleotides Autonomous of the Host Genome
The polynucleotides of the present invention can exist autonomously or independent of the host cell genome. Vectors of these types are known in the art and include, for example, certain type of non-integrating viral vectors, autonomously replicating plasmids, artificial chromosomes, and the like.
Additionally, in some cases transient expression of a polynucleotide may be desired.
(2) Polynucleotides Integrated into the Host Genome
The promoter sequences, promoter control elements or vectors of the present invention may be transformed into host cells. These transformations may be into protoplasts or intact tissues or isolated cells. Preferably expression vectors are introduced into intact tissue. General methods of culturing plant tissues are provided for example by Maki et al. “Procedures for Introducing Foreign DNA into Plants” in Methods in Plant Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, Glich et al. (Eds. pp. 67-88 CRC Press, 1993) and by Phillips et al. “Cell-Tissue Culture and In-Vitro Manipulation” in Corn & Corn Improvement, 3rd Edition 10 Sprague et al. (Eds. pp. 345-387) American Society of Agronomy Inc. et al. 1988.
Methods of introducing polynucleotides into plant tissue include the direct infection or co-cultivation of plant cell with Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Horsch et al. (1985) Science, 227:1229. Descriptions of Agrobacterium vector systems and methods for Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer provided by Gruber et al. supra.
Alternatively, polynucleotides are introduced into plant cells or other plant tissues using a direct gene transfer method such as microprojectile-mediated delivery, DNA injection, electroporation and the like. More preferably polynucleotides are introduced into plant tissues using the microprojectile media delivery with the biolistic device. See, for example, Tomes et al., “Direct DNA transfer into intact plant cells via microprojectile bombardment” In: Gamborg and Phillips (Eds.) Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture: Fundamental Methods, Springer Verlag, Berlin (1995).
In another embodiment of the current invention, expression constructs can be used for gene expression in callus culture for the purpose of expressing marker genes encoding peptides or polypeptides that allow identification of transformed plants. Here, a promoter that is operatively linked to a polynucleotide to be transcribed is transformed into plant cells and the transformed tissue is then placed on callus-inducing media. If the transformation is conducted with leaf discs, for example, callus will initiate along the cut edges. Once callus growth has initiated, callus cells can be transferred to callus shoot-inducing or callus root-inducing media. Gene expression will occur in the callus cells developing on the appropriate media: callus root-inducing promoters will be activated on callus root-inducing media, etc. Examples of such peptides or polypeptides useful as transformation markers include, but are not limited to barstar, glyphosate, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT), kanamycin, spectinomycin, streptomycin or other antibiotic resistance enzymes, green fluorescent protein (GFP), and β-glucuronidase (GUS), etc. Some of the exemplary promoters of the row titled “The predicted promoter sequence” will also be capable of sustaining expression in some tissues or organs after the initiation or completion of regeneration. Examples of these tissues or organs are somatic embryos, cotyledon, hypocotyl, epicotyl, leaf, stems, roots, flowers and seed.
Integration into the host cell genome also can be accomplished by methods known in the art, for example, by the homologous sequences or T-DNA discussed above or using the cre-lox system (A. C. Vergunst et al. (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 38:393).
G. Utility
Common Uses
In yet another embodiment, the promoters of the present invention can be used to further understand developmental mechanisms. For example, promoters that are specifically induced during callus formation, somatic embryo formation, shoot formation or root formation can be used to explore the effects of overexpression, repression or ectopic expression of target genes, or for isolation of trans-acting factors.
The vectors of the invention can be used not only for expression of coding regions but may also be used in exon-trap cloning, or promoter trap procedures to detect differential gene expression in various tissues (see Lindsey et al. (1993) Transgenic Research 2:3347 and Auch & Reth, et al. Nucleic Acids Research, 18: 674).
Entrapment vectors, first described for use in bacteria (Casadaban and Cohen (1979) Proc. Nat. Aca. Sci. U.S.A., 76: 4530; Casadaban et al. (1980) J. Bacteriol., 143: 971) permit selection of insertional events that lie within coding sequences. Entrapment vectors can be introduced into pluripotent ES cells in culture and then passed into the germline via chimeras (Gossler et al. (1989) Science, 244: 463; Skarnes (1990) Biotechnology, 8: 827). Promoter or gene trap vectors often contain a reporter gene, e.g., lacZ, lacking its own promoter and/or splice acceptor sequence upstream. That is, promoter gene traps contain a reporter gene with a splice site but no promoter. If the vector lands in a gene and is spliced into the gene product, then the reporter gene is expressed.
Recently, the isolation of preferentially-induced genes has been made possible with the use of sophisticated promoter traps (e.g. IVET) that are based on conditional auxotrophy complementation or drug resistance. In one IVET approach, various bacterial genome fragments are placed in front of a necessary metabolic gene coupled to a reporter gene. The DNA constructs are inserted into a bacterial strain otherwise lacking the metabolic gene, and the resulting bacteria are used to infect the host organism. Only bacteria expressing the metabolic gene survive in the host organism; consequently, inactive constructs can be eliminated by harvesting only bacteria that survive for some minimum period in the host. At the same time, constitutively active constructs can be eliminated by screening only bacteria that do not express the reporter gene under laboratory conditions. The bacteria selected by such a method contain constructs that are selectively induced only during infection of the host. The IVET approach can be modified for use in plants to identify genes induced in either the bacteria or the plant cells upon pathogen infection or root colonization. For information on IVET see the articles by Mahan et al. (1993) Science 259:686-688, Mahan et al. (1995) PNAS USA 92:669-673, Heithoff et al. (1997) PNAS USA 94:934-939, and Wanget al. (1996) PNAS USA. 93:10434.
Constitutive Transcription
Use of promoters and control elements providing constitutive transcription is desired for modulation of transcription in most cells of an organism under most environmental conditions. In a plant, for example, constitutive transcription is useful for modulating genes involved in defense, pest resistance, herbicide resistance, etc.
Constitutive up-regulation and transcription down-regulation is useful for these applications. For instance, genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that increase defense, pest and herbicide resistance may require constitutive up-regulation of transcription. In contrast, constitutive transcriptional down-regulation may be desired to inhibit those genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that lower defense, pest and herbicide resistance.
Typically, promoter or control elements that provide constitutive transcription produce transcription levels that are statistically similar in many tissues and environmental conditions observed.
Calculation of P-value from the different observed transcript levels is one means of determining whether a promoter or control element is providing constitutive up-regulation. P-value is the probability that the difference of transcript levels is not statistically significant. The higher the P-value, the more likely the difference of transcript levels is not significant. One formula used to calculate P-value is as follows:
where σ(S1 . . . S11, not including Sx)=the standard deviation of all sample intensities except Sx.
The P-value from the formula ranges from 1.0 to 0.0.
Usually, each P-value of the transcript levels observed in a majority of cells, tissues, or organs under various environmental conditions produced by the promoter or control element is greater than 10−8; more usually, greater than 10−; even more usually, greater than 10−6; even more usually, greater than 10−5 or 10−4.
For up-regulation of transcription, promoter and control elements produce transcript levels that are above background of the assay.
Stress Induced Preferential Transcription
Promoters and control elements providing modulation of transcription under oxidative, drought, oxygen, wound, and methyl jasmonate stress are particularly useful for producing host cells or organisms that are more resistant to biotic and abiotic stresses. In a plant, for example, modulation of genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides in response to oxidative stress can protect cells against damage caused by oxidative agents, such as hydrogen peroxide and other free radicals.
Drought induction of genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides is useful to increase the viability of a plant, for example, when water is a limiting factor. In contrast, genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides induced during oxygen stress can help the flood tolerance of a plant.
The promoters and control elements of the present invention can modulate stresses similar to those described in, for example, stress conditions are VuPLD1 (drought stress; Cowpea; see Pham-Thi et al. (1999) Plant Mol Biol 1257-65), pyruvate decarboxylase (oxygen stress; rice; see Rivosal et al. (1997) Plant Physiol. 114(3): 1021-29) and chromoplast specific carotenoid gene (oxidative stress; capsicum; see Bouvier et al. (1998) Journal of Biological Chemistry 273:30651-59).
Promoters and control elements providing preferential transcription during wounding or induced by methyl jasmonate can produce a defense response in host cells or organisms. In a plant, for example, preferential modulation of genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides under such conditions is useful to induce a defense response to mechanical wounding, pest or pathogen attack or treatment with certain chemicals.
Promoters and control elements of the present invention also can trigger a response similar to those described for cf9 (viral pathogen; tomato; see O'Donnell et al. (1998) Plant J 14(1): 137-42), hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor type 1 (HAI-1), which enhances tissue regeneration (tissue injury; human; Koono et al. (1999) J Histochem and Cytochem 47: 673-82), copper amine oxidase (CuAO), induced during ontogenesis and wound healing (wounding; chick-pea; Rea et al. (1998) FEBS Letters 437: 177-82), proteinase inhibitor II (wounding; potato; see Pena-Cortes et al. (1988) Planta 174: 84-89), protease inhibitor II (methyl jasmonate; tomato; see Farmer and Ryan (1990) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 7713-7716) and two vegetative storage protein genes VspA and VspB (wounding, jasmonic acid, and water deficit; soybean; see Mason and Mullet (1990) Plant Cell 2: 569-579).
Up-regulation and transcription down-regulation are useful for these applications. For instance, genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that increase oxidative, flood, or drought tolerance may require up-regulation of transcription. In contrast, transcriptional down-regulation may be desired to inhibit those genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that lower such tolerance.
Typically, promoter or control elements, which provide preferential transcription in wounding or under methyl jasmonate induction, produce transcript levels that are statistically significant as compared to cell types, organs or tissues under other conditions.
For preferential up-regulation of transcription, promoter and control elements produce transcript levels that are above background of the assay.
Light Induced Preferential Transcription
Promoters and control elements providing preferential transcription when induced by light exposure can be utilized to modulate growth, metabolism, and development; to increase drought tolerance; and decrease damage from light stress for host cells or organisms. In a plant, for example, modulation of genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides in response to light is useful
Up-regulation and transcription down-regulation are useful for these applications. For instance, genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that increase drought or light tolerance may require up-regulation of transcription. In contrast, transcriptional down-regulation may be desired to inhibit those genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that lower such tolerance.
Typically, promoter or control elements, which provide preferential transcription in cells, tissues or organs exposed to light, produce transcript levels that are statistically significant as compared to cells, tissues, or organs under decreased light exposure (intensity or length of time).
For preferential up-regulation of transcription, promoter and control elements produce transcript levels that are above background of the assay.
Dark Induced Preferential Transcription
Promoters and control elements providing preferential transcription when induced by dark or decreased light intensity or decreased light exposure time can be utilized to time growth, metabolism, and development, to modulate photosynthesis capabilities for host cells or organisms. In a plant, for example, modulation of genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides in response to dark is useful, for example,
Up-regulation and transcription down-regulation is useful for these applications. For instance, genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that increase growth and development may require up-regulation of transcription. In contrast, transcriptional down-regulation may be desired to inhibit those genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that modulate photosynthesis capabilities.
Typically, promoter or control elements, which provide preferential transcription under exposure to dark or decrease light intensity or decrease exposure time, produce transcript levels that are statistically significant.
For preferential up-regulation of transcription, promoter and control elements produce transcript levels that are above background of the assay.
Leaf Preferential Transcription
Promoters and control elements providing preferential transcription in a leaf can modulate growth, metabolism, and development or modulate energy and nutrient utilization in host cells or organisms. In a plant, for example, preferential modulation of genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptide in a leaf, is useful, for example,
(1) to modulate leaf size, shape, and development;
(2) to modulate the number of leaves ; or
(3) to modulate energy or nutrient usage in relation to other organs and tissues
Up-regulation and transcription down-regulation is useful for these applications. For instance, genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that increase growth, for example, may require up-regulation of transcription. In contrast, transcriptional down-regulation may be desired to inhibit energy usage in a leaf to be directed to the fruit instead, for instance.
Typically, promoter or control elements, which provide preferential transcription in the cells, tissues, or organs of a leaf, produce transcript levels that are statistically significant as compared to other cells, organs or tissues.
For preferential up-regulation of transcription, promoter and control elements produce transcript levels that are above background of the assay.
Root Preferential Transcription
Promoters and control elements providing preferential transcription in a root can modulate growth, metabolism, development, nutrient uptake, nitrogen fixation, or modulate energy and nutrient utilization in host cells or organisms. In a plant, for example, preferential modulation of genes, transcripts, and/or in a leaf, is useful
(1) to modulate root size, shape, and development;
(2) to modulate the number of roots, or root hairs;
(3) to modulate mineral, fertilizer, or water uptake;
(4) to modulate transport of nutrients; or
(4) to modulate energy or nutrient usage in relation to other organs and tissues.
Up-regulation and transcription down-regulation is useful for these applications. For instance, genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that increase growth, for example, may require up-regulation of transcription. In contrast, transcriptional down-regulation may be desired to inhibit nutrient usage in a root to be directed to the leaf instead, for instance.
Typically, promoter or control elements, which provide preferential transcription in cells, tissues, or organs of a root, produce transcript levels that are statistically significant as compared to other cells, organs or tissues.
For preferential up-regulation of transcription, promoter and control elements produce transcript levels that are above background of the assay.
Stem/Shoot Preferential Transcription
Promoters and control elements providing preferential transcription in a stem or shoot can modulate growth, metabolism, and development or modulate energy and nutrient utilization in host cells or organisms. In a plant, for example, preferential modulation of genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptide in a stem or shoot, is useful, for example,
(1) to modulate stem/shoot size, shape, and development; or
(2) to modulate energy or nutrient usage in relation to other organs and tissues
Up-regulation and transcription down-regulation is useful for these applications. For instance, genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that increase growth, for example, may require up-regulation of transcription. In contrast, transcriptional down-regulation may be desired to inhibit energy usage in a stem/shoot to be directed to the fruit instead, for instance.
Typically, promoter or control elements, which provide preferential transcription in the cells, tissues, or organs of a stem or shoot, produce transcript levels that are statistically significant as compared to other cells, organs or tissues.
For preferential up-regulation of transcription, promoter and control elements produce transcript levels that are above background of the assay.
Fruit and Seed Preferential Transcription
Promoters and control elements providing preferential transcription in a silique or fruit can time growth, development, or maturity; or modulate fertility; or modulate energy and nutrient utilization in host cells or organisms. In a plant, for example, preferential modulation of genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides in a fruit, is useful
Up-regulation and transcription down-regulation is useful for these applications. For instance, genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that increase growth, for example, may require up-regulation of transcription. In contrast, transcriptional down-regulation may be desired to inhibit late fruit maturity, for instance.
Typically, promoter or control elements, which provide preferential transcription in the cells, tissues, or organs of siliques or fruits, produce transcript levels that are statistically significant as compared to other cells, organs or tissues.
For preferential up-regulation of transcription, promoter and control elements produce transcript levels that are above background of the assay.
Callus Preferential Transcription
Promoters and control elements providing preferential transcription in a callus can be useful to modulating transcription in dedifferentiated host cells. In a plant transformation, for example, preferential modulation of genes, transcripts, in callus is useful to modulate transcription of a marker gene, which can facilitate selection of cells that are transformed with exogenous polynucleotides.
Up-regulation and transcription down-regulation is useful for these applications. For instance, genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that increase marker gene detectability, for example, may require up-regulation of transcription. In contrast, transcriptional down-regulation may be desired to increase the ability of the calluses to later differentiate, for instance.
Typically, promoter or control elements, which provide preferential transcription in callus, produce transcript levels that are statistically significant as compared to other cell types, tissues, or organs. Calculation of P-value from the different observed transcript levels is one means of determining whether a promoter or control element is providing such preferential transcription.
Usually, each P-value of the transcript levels observed in callus as compared to, at least one other cell type, tissue or organ, is less than 10−4; more usually, less than 10−5; even more usually, less than 10−6; even more usually, less than 10−7 or 10−8.
For preferential up-regulation of transcription, promoter and control elements produce transcript levels that are above background of the assay.
Flower Specific Transcription
Promoters and control elements providing preferential transcription in flowers can modulate pigmentation; or modulate fertility in host cells or organisms. In a plant, for example, preferential modulation of genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides in a flower, is useful,
(1) to modulate petal color; or
(2) to modulate the fertility of pistil and/or stamen.
Up-regulation and transcription down-regulation is useful for these applications. For instance, genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that increase pigmentation, for example, may require up-regulation of transcription. In contrast, transcriptional down-regulation may be desired to inhibit fertility, for instance.
Typically, promoter or control elements, which provide preferential transcription in flowers, produce transcript levels that are statistically significant as compared to other cells, organs or tissues.
For preferential up-regulation of transcription, promoter and control elements produce transcript levels that are above background of the assay.
Immature Bud and Inflorescence Preferential Transcription
Promoters and control elements providing preferential transcription in a immature bud or inflorescence can time growth, development, or maturity; or modulate fertility or viability in host cells or organisms. In a plant, for example, preferential modulation of genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptide in a fruit, is useful,
(1) to modulate embryo development, size, and maturity;
(2) to modulate endosperm development, size, and composition;
(3) to modulate the number of seeds and fruits; or
(4) to modulate seed development and viability.
Up-regulation and transcription down-regulation is useful for these applications. For instance, genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that increase growth, for example, may require up-regulation of transcription. In contrast, transcriptional down-regulation may be desired to decrease endosperm size, for instance.
Typically, promoter or control elements, which provide preferential transcription in immature buds and inflorescences, produce transcript levels that are statistically significant as compared to other cell types, organs or tissues.
For preferential up-regulation of transcription, promoter and control elements produce transcript levels that are above background of the assay.
Senescence Preferential Transcription
Promoters and control elements providing preferential transcription during senescence can be used to modulate cell degeneration, nutrient mobilization, and scavenging of free radicals in host cells or organisms. Other types of responses that can be modulated include, for example, senescence associated genes (SAG) that encode enzymes thought to be involved in cell degeneration and nutrient mobilization (Arabidopsis; see Hensel et al. (1993) Plant Cell 5: 553-64), and the CP-2/cathepsin L gene (rat; Kim and Wright (1997) Biol Reprod 57: 1467-77), both induced during senescence.
In a plant, for example, preferential modulation of genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides during senescencing is useful to modulate fruit ripening.
Up-regulation and transcription down-regulation is useful for these applications. For instance, genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that increase scavenging of free radicals, for example, may require up-regulation of transcription. In contrast, transcriptional down-regulation may be desired to inhibit cell degeneration, for instance.
Typically, promoter or control elements, which provide preferential transcription in cells, tissues, or organs during senescence, produce transcript levels that are statistically significant as compared to other conditions.
For preferential up-regulation of transcription, promoter and control elements produce transcript levels that are above background of the assay.
Germination Preferential Transcription
Promoters and control elements providing preferential transcription in a germinating seed can time growth, development, or maturity; or modulate viability in host cells or organisms. In a plant, for example, preferential modulation of genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptide in a germinating seed, is useful,
(1) to modulate the emergence of they hypocotyls, cotyledons and radical; or
(2) to modulate shoot and primary root growth and development;
Up-regulation and transcription down-regulation is useful for these applications. For instance, genes, transcripts, and/or polypeptides that increase growth, for example, may require up-regulation of transcription. In contrast, transcriptional down-regulation may be desired to decrease endosperm size, for instance.
Typically, promoter or control elements, which provide preferential transcription in a germinating seed, produce transcript levels that are statistically significant as compared to other cell types, organs or tissues.
For preferential up-regulation of transcription, promoter and control elements produce transcript levels that are above background of the assay.
GFP Experimental Procedures and Results
Procedures
The polynucleotide sequences of the present invention are tested for promoter activity using Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) assays in the following manner.
Approximately 1-2 kb of genomic sequence occurring immediately upstream of the ATG translational start site of the gene of interest is isolated using appropriate primers tailed with BstXI restriction sites. Standard PCR reactions using these primers and genomic DNA are conducted. The resulting product is isolated, cleaved with BstXI and cloned into the BstXI site of an appropriate vector, such as pNewBin4-HAP1-GFP (see
Transformation
The following procedure is used for transformation of plants
1. Seed Preparation and Plant Growth.
A homogeneous mixture of Arabidopsis thaliana seed in a 0.2% Phytagar solution is inclubated at 4° C. in the dark for 3 days. Seed is planted in 4 inch pots in a soil miture of Sunshine Mix, Vermiculite, Marathon and Osmocote. Pots are placed in flats, covered with plastic domes and subsequently subirrigated. After 3 to 4 days, the domes are removed.
Seven to ten days after planting, seedlings are thinned to 20 plants per pot. When 5-10 cm long bolts appear, they are clipped between the first node and the stem base to induce secondary bolts. Six to 7 days after clipping, the plants are transformed via dipping infiltration.
2. Preparation of Agrobacterium.
Each 4 inch pot is inverted and the aerial portion of the plants submerged into a 16 oz. polypropylene container holding 200 mls of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (1×107 bacteria) in Infiltration media (2.2 g MS salts, 50 g sucrose, 110 μg BAP and 0.02% Silwet L-77 per liter). After 5 minutes, the Agrobacterium solution is removed while keeping the polypropylene containiner in place and the pots returned to an upright position. Pots are then placed in flats (10 pots per flat) containing approximately 1 inch of water and covered with shade cloth. After 24 hours, the shade cloth and polypropylene containers are removed.
After flowering, each pot is covered with a ciber plant sleeve. When plants are completely dry, seed is collected and stored.
3. High Throughput Screening—T1 Generation
Transformed seed are placed in pots containing a water saturated soil miture of Sunshine Mix, Vermiculite, Marathon and Osmocote. Pots are then placed in flats and stored in the dark at 4° C. for at least 2 days. After transferring the flats from the cooler to the greenhouse, they are covered with 55% shade cloth and propagation domes. When the cotyledons are fully expanded the cloth and domes are removed.
Plants are sprayed with a solution of 3 ml concentrated Finale in 48 oz water. Spraying is repeated every 3-4 days until only transformants remain. Transformants are thinned to a maximum of 5 plants per pot.
4. GFP Assay
Tissues are dissected by eye or under magnification using INOX 5 grade forceps and placed on a slide with water and coversliped. An attempt is made to record images of observed expression patterns at earliest and latest stages of development of tissues listed below. Specific tissues will be preceded with High (H), Medium (M), Low (L) designations.
T1 Mature: These are the T1 plants resulting from independent transformation events. These are screened between stage 6.50-6.90 (means the plant is flowering and that 50-90% of the flowers that the plant will make have developed) which is 4-6 weeks of age. At this stage the mature plant possesses flowers, siliques at all stages of development, and fully expanded leaves. We do not generally differentiate between 6.50 and 6.90 in the report but rather just indicate 6.50. The plants are initially imaged under UV with a Leica Confocal microscope. This allows examination of the plants on a global level. If expression is present, they are imaged using scanning laser confocal micsrocopy.
T2 Seedling: Progeny are collected from the T1 plants giving the same expression pattern and the progeny (T2) are sterilized and plated on agar-solidified medium containing M&S salts. In the event that there is no expression in the T1 plants, T2 seeds are planted from all lines. The seedlings are grown in Percival incubators under continuous light at 22° C. for 10-12 days. Cotyledons, roots, hypocotyls, petioles, leaves, and the shoot meristem region of individual seedlings are screened until two seedlings are observed to have the same pattern. Generally found the same expression pattern is found in the first two seedlings. However, up to 6 seedlings are screened before “no expression pattern” is recorded. All constructs are screened as T2 seedlings even if they did not have an expression pattern in the T1 generation.
T2 Mature: The T2 mature plants are screened in a similar manner to the T1 plants. The T2 seeds are planted in the greenhouse, exposed to selection and at least one plant screened to confirm the T1 expression pattern. In instances where there are any subtle changes in expression, multiple plants are examined and the changes noted in the tables.
T3 Seedling: This is done similar to the T2 seedlings except that only the plants for which we are trying to confirm the pattern are planted.
Image Data
Images are collected by scanning laser confocal microscopy. Scanned images are taken as 2-D optical sections or 3-D images generated by stacking the 2-D optical sections collected in series. All scanned images are saved as TIFF files by imaging software, edited in Adobe Photoshop, and labeled in Powerpoint specifying organ and specific expressing tissues.
Instrumentation
An Inverted Leica DM IRB microscope is used with two Fluorescence filter blocks: (1) Blue excitation BP 450-490; long pass emission LP 515 and (2) Green excitation BP 515-560; long pass emission LP 590. The following objectives are used: HC PL FLUOTAR 5×/0.5, HCPL APO 10×/0.4 IMM water/glycerol/oil, HCPL APO 20×/0.7 IMM water/glycerol/oil and HCXL APO 63×/1.2 IMM water/glycerol/oil. A Leica TCS SP2 confocal scanner with a Spectral range of detector optics of 400-850 nm was used with a variable computer controlled pinhole diameter, an Optical zoom 1-32× and four simultaneous detectors: three channels for collection of fluorescence or reflected light and one channel for transmitted light detector. The laser sources are: (1) Blue Ar 458/5 mW, 476 nm/5 mW, 488 nm/20 mW, 514 nm/20 mW, (2) Green HeNe 543 mn/1.2 mW and (3) Red HeNe 633 nm/10 mW.
The Examples are organized by an Expression Report for each of the promoters of the invention. They provide the details for expression driven by each of the nucleic acid promoter sequences as observed in transgenic plants. The results are presented as summaries of the spatial expression, which provides information as to gross and/or specific expression in various plant organs and tissues. The observed expression pattern is also presented, which gives details of expression during different generations or different developmental stages within a generation. Additional information is provided regarding the associated gene, the GenBank reference, the source organism of the promoter, and the vector and marker genes used for the construct. The following symbols are used consistently throughout:
Arabidopsis thaliana, Ws
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, WS ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, WS ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, WS ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, WS ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, WS ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Ws ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Ws ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Ws
Arabidopsis thaliana, Ws ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, WS ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, WS ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, WS ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Wassilewskija WS ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, WS ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia
Arabidopsis thaliana, Wassilewskija (WS) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Col
Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.August 2002;129(4):1464-72. PMID:
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Microarray
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Microarray
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Microarray
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Microarray
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Microarray
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Wassilewskija (WS) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Microarray
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Wassilewskija (WS) ecotype
Arabidopsis knockout line gametophytic lethal
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col) ecotype
The invention being thus described, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that various modifications of the materials and methods for practicing the invention can be made. Such modifications are to be considered within the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
Each of the references from the patent and periodical literature cited herein is hereby expressly incorporated in its entirety by such citation.
This Nonprovisional application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) on U.S. Provisional Application No(s). 60/612,891; 60/613,134; and 60/637,174 filed on Sep. 23, 2004; Sep. 23, 2004 and Dec. 16, 2004, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. This application contains one (1) CDR submitted in duplicate (totaling 3 CDs), created using IBM-PC MS-Windows operating system. The CD-Rs contain the following file(s): File NameDate of CreationFile SizeSequence Listing 2750-1619PUS2.txtSep. 23, 200564 KB
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1209228 | May 2002 | EP |
| WO-0216655 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20060090216 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60637174 | Dec 2004 | US | |
| 60612891 | Sep 2004 | US | |
| 60613134 | Sep 2004 | US |
