The present invention relates to large titanium buckets for use in the last stage of steam turbine engines and to the method for manufacturing such high strength buckets. Specifically, the invention relates to titanium buckets having better erosion resistance.
It is generally recognized that the performance of a steam turbine engine is greatly influenced by the design and performance of later stage buckets operating at reduced steam pressures. Ideally, the last stage bucket should efficiently use the expansion of steam down to the turbine exhaust pressure, while minimizing the kinetic energy of the steam flow leaving the last stage.
The service requirements of steam turbine buckets can be complex and demanding. Last stage buckets, in particular, are routinely exposed to a variety of severe operating conditions, including the corrosive environments caused by high moisture and the carry-over from the boiler. Such conditions can lead to serious corrosion and pitting problems with the bucket material, particularly in longer, last stage turbine buckets. Thus, for some time, last stage buckets for turbines have been the subject of repeated investigations and development work in an effort to improve their efficiency under harsh operating conditions, since even small increases in bucket efficiency and life span can result in significant economic benefits over the life of a steam turbine engine.
Last stage turbine buckets are exposed to a wide range of flows, loads and strong dynamic forces. Thus, from the standpoint of mechanical strength and durability, the primary factors that affect the final bucket profile design include the active length of the bucket, the pitch diameter and the operating speed in the operative flow regions. Damping, bucket fatigue and corrosion resistance of the materials of construction at the maximum anticipated operating conditions also play an important role in the final bucket design and method of manufacture.
The development of larger last stage turbine buckets poses additional design problems due to the inertial loads that often exceed the strength capability of conventional bucket materials. Steam turbine buckets, particularly last stage buckets with longer vanes, experience higher tensile loadings and thus are subject to cyclic stresses which, when combined with a corrosive environment, can be very damaging to the bucket over long periods of use. In addition, the steam in the last stages normally is “wet,” i.e., containing a higher amount of saturated steam. As a result, water droplet impact erosion of the bucket material often occurs in the last stage. Such erosion reduces the useable service life of the bucket and the efficiency of the steam turbine as a whole.
In the past, it has been difficult to find bucket materials capable of meeting all of the mechanical requirements for different end use applications, particularly mechanical designs in which longer vane buckets have been employed. Invariably, the longer buckets have increased strength requirements and, as noted above, suffer from even greater erosion and pitting potential. The higher stresses inherent in longer vane designs also increase the potential for stress corrosion cracking at elevated operating temperatures because the higher strength required in the bucket material tends to increase the susceptibility to stress cracking at operating temperatures at or near 140° F. The effects of pitting corrosion and corrosion fatigue also increase with the higher applied stresses in last stage buckets having longer vane lengths.
The strength of titanium buckets is lower than that of stainless steel buckets, and therefore titanium buckets can tolerate less erosion loss before a catastrophic failure. Near-zero erosion loss for titanium buckets is desirable. Moreover, titanium buckets are also more expensive than stainless steel buckets; thus for a titanium bucket to be cost effective, longer service life and less erosion loss of titanium buckets is desirable.
Embodiments of the invention include a bucket for use in the last stage of a steam turbine engine, the bucket having a titanium-based alloy having between about 3% and 6.25% by weight aluminum, up to 3.5% vanadium, up to 2.25% tin, up to 2.25% zirconium, between about 1.75% and 5.0% molybdenum, up to 2.25% chromium, up to 0.7% silicon and up to 2.3% iron, with the balance being titanium. The bucket includes a leading edge wherein the leading edge includes titania having a plurality of pores and a top sealing layer filling the plurality of pores the sealing layer selected from the group consisting of: chromium, cobalt, nickel, polyimide, polytetrafluoroethylene and polyester.
Embodiments of the present invention also include a method for manufacturing a last stage turbine bucket for use in a steam turbine engine. The method includes forming a steam turbine bucket having a titanium-based alloy having between about 3% and 6.25% by weight aluminum, up to 3.5% vanadium, up to 2.25% tin, up to 2.25% zirconium, between about 1.75% and 5.0% molybdenum, up to 2.25% chromium, up to 0.7% silicon and up to 2.3% iron, with the balance being titanium. The method includes applying a high voltage to a leading edge of said bucket in an electrolyte to form a titania transition layer and a top porous layer. The top porous layer is sealed with a material selected from the group consisting of: chromium, cobalt nickel, polyimide, polytetrafluoroethylene and polyester.
Embodiments of the present invention also include an article. The article includes a titanium-based alloy having a leading edge, wherein the leading edge includes titania having a plurality of pores, and a top sealing layer filling the plurality of pores the sealing layer selected from the group consisting of: chromium, cobalt, nickel, polyimide, polytetrafluoroethylene and polyester.
The above described and other features are exemplified by the following detailed description.
These and other features of this invention will be more readily understood from the following detailed description of the various aspects of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings that depict various embodiments of the invention, in which:
There is not an effective coating for titanium buckets in the prior art because dissimilar materials are difficult to coat on titanium. Titanium is not compatible with most harder metallic materials because of brittle and weak intermetallics. Using plasma vapor deposition (PVD) or chemical vapor deposition (CVD) for coating on titanium does not build a layer thick enough for erosion resistance. Other cladding and welding at high temperature tends to degrade the base titanium materials.
Titanium alloys have been used to manufacture last stage buckets; however, higher erosion resistance of titanium alloys will allow even longer bucket design with higher maximum tip speed. Larger annulus for the longer buckets lead to higher efficiency and fewer stages in the turbine. Fewer stages reduce hardware cost for steam turbines.
The leading edge of the last stage bucket is most susceptible to erosion.
Suitable titanium alloys used for last stage bucket include titanium, titanium based alloy and titania as a coating material. Titanium-based alloys according to the invention have the exemplary weight percentages shown below in Table I:
This titanium alloy is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,195,455 and incorporated in its entirety by reference herein. Other titanium-based alloys used to form buckets according to the invention display either a beta or alpha beta structure and achieve a minimum fracture toughness of about 50 ksi root square inches.
Exemplary profiles for longer vane last stage buckets capable of being formed with titanium alloys according to the invention are described in commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 5,393,200, entitled “Bucket for the Last Stage of Turbine” and incorporated in its entirety by reference herein. The titanium, and titanium alloys are then treated to improve the erosion resistance of the leading edge.
In the initial step to improve the leading edge, the base metal 20 is subjected to a contact plasma process in an electrolyte to convert the outer surface material to titania. The thickness of the titania layer 22 reaches up to 200 micrometers. The hardness of the titania layer increase to about 1000 HV, an increased of 360 HV from the base material. The titania layer 22 contains pores for electrical discharge. The pores allow plasma channels at high temperature to convert titanium into titanium oxide or titania. A plasma channel starts from the liquid interface and proceeds through the titania layer. Then a top sealing layer 24 fills the pores to increase the surface toughness. The top sealing layer 24 is selected from the group consisting of metallic materials, cobalt, chromium, nickel, vanadium, or alloys of these materials. Other top seal coating material are selected from the group consisting of hard polymeric materials, such as polyimide, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), or polyester. It is possible to provided doped metallic or ceramic particles into the polymeric materials prior to applying the top sealing layer 24.
A biasing circuit 62 enables the application of any bipolar AC source. The leading edge 42 is submerged into the electrolytic solution 54 with power connected to the anode or the bucket 40. The leading edge 42 of the bucket 40 is left uncovered in the electrolytic solution 54 through the use of masks 48. The masks 48 can be polymer tapes. It is also possible to submerge part of the leading edge where coating is necessary by sealing off the rest of part surface. The cathodes 56 are large stainless or copper plates surrounding leading edge 42 of the bucket 40 area to be coated. Plate surfaces of the cathodes 56 follow the side surfaces of leading edge 42 as shown in
The moving sparks cover all the exposed or unmasked surfaces at the leading edge 42 of the bucket 40. The electrolytic reaction produces a lot of oxygen at the anode (leading 42) while the high temperature plasma immediately oxidizes the substrate titanium into titanium oxide. The cooling rate is extremely high and the hardness of resultant titania is around 1000 HV. The coating thickness of the titania can reach from about 20 micrometers to about 180 micrometers, or in embodiments from about 30 micrometers to about 160 micrometers, or in embodiments from about 40 micrometers to about 150 micrometers.
The top most part of the leading edge 42 after treatment described above may be loose with a denser bottom layer. High frequency, e.g., greater than 200 Hz, may be applied to increase the coating density. As shown in
The sharp geometry of the leading edge causes concentration of electrical field near the edge. Field concentration leads to overly crowed sparks and overheating. Irregular coating and local defects create a problem with the coating quality. In
The profile and size of the electrical field distributor 64 or insulator can be altered to control the electrical field distribution for uniform coating at the leading edge which is a sharp tip. Other field distribution can also be obtained by different and special insulating blocks or electrical field distributors 64. Such a control of electrical field in space can effectively improve coating quality when sharp geometry is involved.
After the processing of contact plasma oxidation, the coated leading edge 42 surface is cleaned and dried to remove any residual electrolyte and loose material. If the top layer is loose, the use of abrasive lapping or polishing may be required to remove such material. Polishing is optional as the next sealing layer can solidify the loose material. The bottom layer on the base metal is denser and less porous than the top layer. Also, high power frequency can reduce the coating porosity.
On top of the titania coating, another layer of coating is applied to seal the porosity for better toughness and integrity. The top sealing layer material is selected from the group consisting of hard metals, such as chromium, cobalt, or nickel. In an alternate embodiment the sealing layer material is selected from the group consisting of polymers, such as polyimide, PTFE, or polyester.
Metallic coating methods include electroplating, electroless plating, or PVD/CVD. These processes take place at low temperature, e.g. less than the recrystallizing temperature of the titanium alloy. The processes apply either electrical energy or chemical energy rather than direct thermal energy to activate the coating particles. Polymer masking or partial sealing is necessary to shield the areas that are not coated in the contact plasma process.
Polymer coating methods include spraying, dipping, or powder coating followed by curing or settling if necessary. Electrostatic spraying or wet electrophoretic plating may be applied to improve the quality of the coating by better filling of the surface pores.
The sealing material fills the pores and other voids to increase the coating toughness in addition to the high hardness of titania. The composite coating is either hard metal in ceramic matrix or polymer in ceramic matrix.
Described herein is a method that allows coating on titanium without forming brittle intermetallics. The conversion coating described herein enables strong bonding without adhesion problems. The coating is thick and durable, and has a thickness up to about 200 microns. The thickness of the titania layer is between about 20 microns and about 150 microns. The thickness of the top sealing layer is between about 0.5 and about 50 microns, or in embodiments from about 1.0 microns to about 40 microns, or in embodiments from about 2.0 microns to about 35 microns.
Hardness of the coating increases from 360 HV of the base airfoil alloy to about 1200 HV of coated titania to increase erosion resistance significantly. The titanium oxide is chemically stable for better corrosion resistance in addition to erosion resistance. The top seal coating by hard metal or tough polymer further improves the toughness against fracture and layer integrity.
Provided herein is a viable hard coating to titanium buckets that have less tolerance to erosion loss and lower yield strength than some stainless buckets. Near zero erosion loss after coating is provided by the method described herein. The coating also prolongs the service life of expensive titanium last stage buckets. The present invention may provide for longer turbine buckets and fewer turbine stages for the same power and efficiency due to increased annulus area and efficiency without erosion loss from higher tip speed.
The terms “first,” “second,” and the like, herein do not denote any order, quantity, or importance, but rather are used to distinguish one element from another, and the terms “a” and “an” herein do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced items. The modifier “about” used in connection with a quantity is inclusive of the stated value and has the meaning dictated by the context, (e.g., includes the degree of error associated with measurement of the particular quantity). The suffix “(s)” as used herein is intended to include both the singular and the plural of the term that it modifies, thereby including one or more of that term (e.g., the metal(s) includes one or more metals). Ranges disclosed herein are inclusive and independently combinable (e.g., ranges of “up to about 25 w/o, or, more specifically, about 5 w/o to about 20 w/o”, are inclusive of the endpoints and all intermediate values of the ranges of “about 5 w/o to about 25 w/o,” etc).
While various embodiments are described herein, it will be appreciated from the specification that various combinations of elements, variations or improvements therein may be made by those skilled in the art, and are within the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
This Application is a divisional of U.S. Pat. No. 9,267,218 filed on Sep. 9, 2011.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3647647 | Winfree | Mar 1972 | A |
3691029 | Raymond et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3725217 | Hartshorn | Apr 1973 | A |
3890456 | Dils | Jun 1975 | A |
4005989 | Preston | Feb 1977 | A |
4029477 | Grisik | Jun 1977 | A |
4354905 | Yoshida et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4416739 | Turner | Nov 1983 | A |
4530739 | Hanak et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4548682 | Yoshida et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4787962 | Temprano et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4839237 | Coulon et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4902388 | Fornwalt et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5077140 | Luthra et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5122182 | Dorfman et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5351395 | Crawmer | Oct 1994 | A |
5385662 | Kurze et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5393200 | Dinh et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5487825 | Kurze et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5683226 | Clark et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5900278 | Coffinberry et al. | May 1999 | A |
6127044 | Yamamoto | Oct 2000 | A |
6197178 | Patel et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6365028 | Shatrov | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6447924 | Bettridge | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6896785 | Shatrov et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7195455 | Stonitsch et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7569132 | Dolan | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7744343 | Burdgick et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7758968 | Schmitz et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
9353453 | Chiesa | May 2016 | B2 |
20030150419 | Daragheh et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030155231 | Weng | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20070102300 | Dai | May 2007 | A1 |
20090127246 | Hendricks et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090223829 | Gao et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090250351 | Ostrovsky | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2053310 | Jan 1996 | RU |
2165475 | Apr 2001 | RU |
2213802 | Oct 2003 | RU |
Entry |
---|
Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with corresponding RU Application No. 2012137139 dated Jul. 1, 2016. |
Dunleavy et al., “Characterisation of discharge events during plasma electrolytic oxidation,” Surface and Coatings Technology. 203:3410-9 (2009). |
Yerokhin et al., “Plasma electrolysis for surface engineering,” Surface and Coatings Technology. 122:73-93 (1999). |
Walsh et al., “Plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) for production of anodised coatings on lightweight metal (Al, Mg, Ti) alloys,” Transactions of the Institute of Metal Finishing. 87(3):122-35 (2009). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/924,628, dated Feb. 13, 2014, 28 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,628, dated Jun. 20, 2014, 24 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,628, dated Sep. 18, 2014, 18 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,628, dated Feb. 11, 2015, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,628, dated Jun. 5, 2015, 18 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,628, dated Nov. 20, 2015, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160017722 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13224628 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 14870640 | US |