This invention relates a window assembly for vehicles. More specifically, the invention relates to a flange for protecting an edge of an opening in the window assembly.
The edges of openings in a vehicle body structure, such as a window, are subject to damage (e.g. chips, scratches, and dings) as an object passes through the opening or rests on the edge of the opening. While the primary functional purpose of a sliding window assembly in a vehicle is for ventilation, it is not uncommon for a user to take advantage of the window as a pass-through opening for supporting lengthy cargo. For example, damage of an exposed edge of glass in a vehicle opening may result from the pass-through of an object or resting of an object on the edge of the glass in a slider backlight assembly commonly found on pick-up truck vehicles.
The downward force exerted by resting such cargo on the expose edge of the window opening should, in most cases, not be of major concern by itself, since the compressive strength of most window panels is quite good. However, lateral forces (fore and aft), abrasion, and/or impact forces resulting from such cargo resting on the edge of the opening may damage the panel.
In overcoming the above mentioned and other drawbacks, the present invention is directed to a flange attached to a window panel with an opening. The flange prevents an object from contacting the bottom edge of the opening as the object is passed through the opening. Moreover, the cargo rests on the flange rather than the bottom edge to prevent the cargo from damaging the window panel.
The flange may be attached either to the inside or outside of the window panel. The upper surface of the flange may be at the same elevation as the bottom edge of the opening, or it may be higher or lower than the bottom edge. The flange may be attached to the window panel with screws, bolts, adhesives, or any other suitable attachment mechanism. The window panel may be made of glass or plastic, and the flange may be made of metal, plastic, or any suitable material that can withstand the loads from the cargo. The flange may have a contour which biases the object away from the sides of the opening.
Other advantages and features of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description and from the claims.
The accompanying drawings, incorporated in and forming a part of the specification, illustrate several aspects of the present invention. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed on illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the views. In the drawings:
An opening in a vehicle body structure is subject to damage (e.g., chips, scratches, and dings) when an object is passed through the opening or rests on an edge of the opening. For example, damage can occur to a sliding glass panel assembly used in the rear window or backlight assembly of pickup trucks. It is not uncommon for users to open the sliding glass panel and pass cargo through the opening. As the cargo rests on the edge of the opening, the force exerted by the cargo can damage the exposed edge. Embodiments of the invention discussed herein are directed to an apparatus that prevents damage to the window panel by incorporating a protective flange in the window assembly.
In one example, the panel 12 is part of the backlight assembly of a vehicle, such as a pickup truck. Accordingly, cargo can be placed in the bed of the truck with some of the cargo extending through the opening 14. As shown, the flange 18 is attached to the inside of the panel 12 and is about the same length or longer than bottom edge 16 of the opening 14 to ensure the cargo is entirely supported by the flange 18 if the cargo moves towards either side of the opening 14. A top surface 22 of the flange 18 is shown elevated above the edge lower 16. Thus, the cargo rests on the flange 18 rather than the lower edge 20 of the opening 14, such that the cargo exerts a downward force on the flange 18 and not on the edge 20. Moreover, lateral forces (fore and aft), abrasion, and/or impact forces that typical result from resting the cargo directly on the edge 16 are eliminated.
Another embodiment shown in
As shown, the outer regions 46 of a top surface 48 of the flange 38 may have an arcuate shape. Alternatively, these regions may be straight, that is, the outer regions may angle upwards from the central region 42.
Similar to the flange 18 discussed above, the flange 38 is parallel to the bottom edge 40 and is longer than the opening 34. Further, the top surface 48 of the flange 38 is elevated above the bottom edge 30. Therefore, like the embodiment shown in
Implementations of the flange are not limited to those shown in
As shown in the illustrated embodiments, the vertical extending portion of the flanges are spaced apart from the window panel. Although the flange as depicted has a generally L-shaped cross section, other cross sections and non-uniform shapes are possible. In some configurations, the flange is a rectangular block mounted flush against the window panel. The flange can be attached to the window by any suitable attachment mechanism, such as bolts, screws or adhesives.
It is therefore intended that the foregoing detailed description be regarded as illustrative rather than limiting, and that it be understood that it is the following claims, including all equivalents, that are intended to define the spirit and scope of this invention. For example, the flange can be made from a plastic or from a metal.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/429,807, filed Nov. 27, 2002, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3321234 | Harrell et al. | May 1967 | A |
4124054 | Spretnjak | Nov 1978 | A |
4785583 | Kawagoe et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
5473840 | Gillen et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5505023 | Gillen et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
6018913 | Lin | Feb 2000 | A |
6119401 | Lin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125585 | Koneval et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6591552 | Rasmussen | Jul 2003 | B1 |
20030213179 | Galer | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040020131 | Galer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040098933 A1 | May 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60429807 | Nov 2002 | US |