This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/918,844, filed Jul. 31, 2001, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/373,348, filed August 12, 1999, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,342,294, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their respective entireties.
Not Applicable.
The present invention relates generally to composite articles formed from expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (“ePTFE”) materials, and particularly to a composite article made up of a plurality of polytetrafluoroethylene (“PTFE”) components having differing expansion characteristics.
Conventional micro porous ePTFE articles are utilized for many useful articles, such as filters, fabrics, gaskets, electrical insulation and human implant devices. These ePTFE articles are typically produced by blending PTFE resin with a lubricant, compressing the blended resin into a billet, extruding the billet into an extrudate, drying the extrudate, calendering the extrudate (if desired), stretching or expanding the extrudate, and sintering the expanded extrudate to form the final article. The ePTFE article can be manufactured in any extruded shape, including sheets, tubes, rods or filaments.
The micro porous structure of known ePTFE articles is characterized by a plurality of nodes that are connected together by a plurality of fibrils. The nodes are essentially solid PTFE, having a density of about 2.0-2.2 grams per cubic centimeter, whereas the density of the expanded material is less than about 2.0 grams per cubic centimeter. Typically, the fibrils of ePTFE materials average in length from about 0.1 microns to about 100 microns, and the volume of the structure occupied by the fibrils has a density ranging from about 2.0 grams per cubic centimeter to less than 0.5 grams per cubic centimeter. The shape, size and orientation of the nodes and fibrils within the structure can be controlled by varying the expansion rate, expansion ratio, number of expansion axes and other processing parameters to yield many different structures. It is also known that properties such as the expandability and microstructure of the expanded article vary with the molecular weight, particle size and other physical characteristics of the PTFE resin. Various methods of producing ePTFE with differing physical properties are described in the literature, e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566, to Gore, herein incorporated by reference.
For some applications it is desirable to provide an article having an asymmetric microstructure in which the fibrils adjacent one surface of the article are relatively short in comparison to the fibrils disposed adjacent the opposite surface of the article. However, attempted solutions to this technical problem have been unsatisfactory due to cost and functionability considerations.
It is an object of the present invention to overcome the technical problems found in conventional ePTFE articles exhibiting asymmetric microstructures, and to provide a composite material that is made up of a plurality of PTFE components having differing expansion characteristics and that possesses an advantageous asymmetric microstructure.
In accordance with these and other objects of the present invention, a multi-layered article, such as a sheet, film or tube, of ePTFE is provided which includes at least two different component layers. At least one of the layers includes anode-fibril structure presenting substantially full-density nodes that are connected together by a first plurality of relatively short fibrils. At least one additional layer of the article includes a plurality of aggregates connected together by a plurality of relatively long fibrils having an average length of greater than about 100 microns. Each of the aggregates are formed of ePTFE including substantially full density nodes that are connected together by a second plurality of relatively short fibrils. Preferably, the short fibrils have an average length of 10-100 microns. A method of producing the article includes the steps of extruding a first PTFE material to form a first extrudate, and extruding a second PTFE material to form a second extrudate, wherein the first PTFE material is highly expandable relative to the second PTFE material. A stack is formed from at least one layer of the first extrudate and at least one layer of the second extrudate, and the stack is expanded and sintered to form the article.
The article of the present invention includes an asymmetric structure in which the lengths of the fibrils provided in the structure are longer adjacent one surface of the article than adjacent the opposite surface. Numerous advantages are realized from this construction. For example, by providing a material comprised of at least one layer of a first PTFE material of a relatively high expandability, and at least one layer of a second PTFE material of a relatively low expandability, it is possible to provide an article having an asymmetric microstructure that varies in fibril length across the thickness of the article. As such, the article has application as a biomedical material, a filter architecture, a textile fabric, a biotech cell-culture substrate, and the like.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention is described below with reference to the attached drawing figures, wherein:
A composite article constructed in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
As described in detail below, the article of the present invention is formed of at least two different PTFE components having differing expansion properties. These components are extruded separately, stacked in layers, brought into intimate contact by means of calendering or compressing in a press or die, expanded, and finally sintered. The resulting article has an asymmetric fibril structure, a unique macro-structure, and a unique micro-structure.
The individual components of the inventive article may be brought into intimate contact by any known means, such as by calendering the layered sheets together or by compressing layered sheets in a press or die. While the methods detailed herein illustrate a process for making a composite sheet material, it is not intended to limit the scope of the present invention to sheet materials. Other useful articles, such as rods, tubes, or other layered configurations can be made in a similar manner.
The multi-layered sheet is preferably comprised of two or more layers of separately extruded resins of differing expandability, referred to herein as type H and type L tapes, wherein type H tapes are those exhibiting an expansion characteristic that renders the material more highly expandable than a type L tape. These tapes are stacked in layers, brought into intimate contact by means such as a press or by calendaring, expanded below the crystalline melt point of PTFE, and then sintered.
Examples of expansion characteristics that render the PTFE more or less expandable than another include the molecular weight of the PTFE resin, the particle sizes in the PTFE resin, the lubricant level during extrusion, the dryness of expanded resin, the dye configuration during extrusion, calendering, and expansion conditions including temperature, expansion rates, and expansion speeds. Thus, a PTFE resin with a relatively high molecular weight might be selected to form the layer with the intended higher expandability, whereas a PTFE resin with a lower molecular weight might be selected to form the less expandable layer. Similarly, a PTFE resin with relatively large particle sizes could be selected to make one layer more expandable, whereas a PTFE resin with relatively small particle sizes might be selected to form the layer with the lesser expandability.
A specific formulation of PTFE paste can be produced by extruding a material that is highly expandable (hereinafter referred to as “type H”). The expanded sintered articles produced from this type H material have a normal node and fibril structure as is known, with fibrils typically ranging from about 5 microns to about 10 microns. An extrudate sheet produced from a different formulation of PTFE paste (hereinafter referred to as “type L”) can produce a PTFE material that is not as highly expandable. The expanded sintered articles produced from this type L material are difficult to make without fracturing, but when made the structure is a typical node-fibril configuration as is conventional.
When type H and L stacked tapes are expanded together at relatively high expansion ratios, the type H component of the article has unexpectedly long fibril lengths, ranging from about 10 to 30 microns. The L type component does not fracture as it would if expanded alone under the given expansion conditions. Instead, it forms a unique large scale aggregate-fibril structure including aggregates having diameters ranging in size from about 500 to 1000 microns, and fibrils connecting the aggregates together and ranging in average length from about 100 to 1000 microns, and preferably from about 500 to 1000 microns. The aggregates, rather than being essentially solid, are actually composed of a fine scale node-fibril structure, with nodes ranging in size from about 10 microns×10 microns and fibrils ranging in average length from about 10 to 30 microns. Thus, the large scale nodes have a density of less than full density, i.e. less than about 2.0 grams per cubic centimeter, while the fine scale nodes are understood to have a density of about 2.0 to 2.2 grams per cubic centimeter as is known in prior art.
The article of the preferred embodiment has two key characteristics. First, the node-fibril structure of the layer or layers formed from the more expandable type H tape is similar to the node-fibril structure known in the prior art. That is, the nodes are essentially solid PTFE, having a density of about 2.0 to 2.2 grams per cubic centimeter. However, the structure of the layer or layers formed from the less expandable type L tape has a large-scale structure of aggregates and fibrils, not similar in appearance to the previously known node-fibril structures. Further, the large-scale aggregates are actually composed of smaller nodes and fibrils; hence the large scale aggregates have a density of less than about 2.0 grams per cubic centimeter. As such, each aggregate is actually comprised of ePTFE, and these aggregates are connected together by fibrils of a length substantially longer than the fibrils defining the fine scale node-fibril structure of each aggregate.
A second key characteristic of the composite article of the present invention is that the fibril lengths of the two component layers differ, with the type L tape layer having unusually long fibrils connected between the aggregates, while the type H tape component layer has more typical fibril lengths. Furthermore, the type H component layer was found to have unexpected and longer fibril lengths in the composite article than would have been formed had it been expanded and sintered alone.
Turning to
As shown in
As shown in
The transition area between an aggregate and the fibrils of the outer layer is illustrated in
Turning to
The method of manufacturing the article of the preferred embodiment broadly includes the steps of extruding two different PTFE components to form first and second extrudates, one of which possesses an expansion characteristic that differs from the other.
A stack is formed from at least one layer of each of the different components, and is calendered to a desired thickness to form a multi-layered sheet. Subsequent to calendering, the sheet is heated in an oven to a temperature below the crystalline melt temperature to remove the mineral spirits, and dried. Thereafter, the dried sheet is expanded, e.g. by a radial expansion process or the like, and is sintered above the crystalline melt temperature of the PTFE to “lock” the structure.
As mentioned above, the suitable characteristics for the invention include a novel macro-structure of expanded ePTFE juxtaposed to a fine or small micro-structure of ePTFE. Macro-structures that exhibit about a 1 mm average fibril length connecting expanded ePTFE aggregates overlying a micro-structure of 20-30 micron fibrils connecting full density PTFE nodes can be made by heat processing the aforementioned expanded assemblies.
A PTFE resin was blended with a typical amount of mineral spirits (about 100 cc per pound of resin) to form a paste, and the paste was billeted, extruded and calendered in a conventional manner to make a tape of the type H PTFE component. The type H PTFE tape was then stacked into 10 layers, and the stack was calendered to a final thickness of about 0.1 inches. The multi-layered sheet resulting from the calendering step was dried in an oven to remove the mineral spirits, and dried. Thereafter, the dried sheet was radially expanded at an expansion ratio of about 5:1 and at an expansion rate of about 200%/second. The resulting first ePTFE article was sintered above the crystalline melt temperature of the PTFE to “lock” the structure.
A PTFE resin was blended with a high amount of mineral spirits (about 200 cc per pound of resin) and the paste was billeted, extruded, and calendered in a conventional manner to make a tape of the type L PTFE component. The type L PTFE tape was then stacked, calendered, dried, expanded, and sintered as described with reference to the type H PTFE tape, forming a second ePTFE article.
A stack was made of 8 sheets of the type H PTFE component, and a sheet of the type L PTFE component was added to both the top and bottom of the stack. The multi-layered stack was then calendered to a final thickness of about 0.1 inches, forming a sheet that was subsequently dried in an oven to remove the mineral spirits. The dried sheet was then radially expanded and sintered as described above with reference to the first and second ePTFE articles. The results are shown in Table 1.
The physical characteristics of the preferred invention are given in Table 2.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiment illustrated in the attached drawing, it is noted that substitutions may be made and equivalents employed herein without departing from the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3953566 | Gore | Apr 1976 | A |
4025679 | Denny | May 1977 | A |
4082893 | Okita | Apr 1978 | A |
4187390 | Gore | Feb 1980 | A |
4208745 | Okita | Jun 1980 | A |
4283448 | Bowman | Aug 1981 | A |
4304010 | Mano | Dec 1981 | A |
4332035 | Mano | Jun 1982 | A |
4385093 | Hubis | May 1983 | A |
4478665 | Hubis | Oct 1984 | A |
4482516 | Bowman et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4650833 | Sakagami et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4656234 | Murayama et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4713070 | Mano | Dec 1987 | A |
4743480 | Campbell et al. | May 1988 | A |
4816339 | Tu et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4819478 | Melcher | Apr 1989 | A |
4820787 | Kataoka et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4824898 | Sukigara et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4849285 | Dillon | Jul 1989 | A |
4859383 | Dillon | Aug 1989 | A |
4876051 | Campbell et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4877661 | House et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4902423 | Bacino | Feb 1990 | A |
4952630 | Morgan et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5024671 | Tu et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5026513 | House et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5064593 | Tamaru et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5071609 | Tu et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5194154 | Moyer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5225131 | Tamaru et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5234739 | Tanaru et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5234751 | Harada et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5258014 | Harada et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5308664 | House et al. | May 1994 | A |
5330782 | Kanazawa | Jul 1994 | A |
5374473 | Knox et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5426128 | Burger et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5429869 | McGregor et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5433909 | Martakos et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437900 | Kuzowski | Aug 1995 | A |
5453235 | Calcote et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5462781 | Zukowski | Oct 1995 | A |
5474824 | Martakos et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476589 | Bacino | Dec 1995 | A |
5480711 | Ruefer | Jan 1996 | A |
5545475 | Korleski | Aug 1996 | A |
5607478 | Lentz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5620763 | House et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5641566 | Kranzler et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5665114 | Weadock et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5688836 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5718973 | Lewis et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5741330 | Brauker et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5800512 | Lentz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5879794 | Korleski | Mar 1999 | A |
6030694 | Dolan et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033758 | Kocher et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039755 | Edwin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6099791 | Shannon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103172 | Newman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110333 | Spethmann et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117555 | Fujimori et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127486 | Burger et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130175 | Rusch et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133165 | Tamaru et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143675 | McCollam et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149998 | Hettinga | Nov 2000 | A |
6162885 | Ruefer | Dec 2000 | A |
6177533 | Woodward | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6194050 | Koerber et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194074 | Wiesemann et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196708 | Rogers | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207251 | Balsimo et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6218000 | Rudolf et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228477 | Klare et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6261497 | Wong et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6287497 | Kawachi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312814 | Kolouch | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6342294 | Ruefer et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6388033 | Noda et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6410084 | Klare et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6436533 | Heffner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6451396 | Zumbrum et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454744 | Spohn et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6479161 | Araki et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500532 | Ruefer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6511927 | Ellis et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518360 | Ausen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6518381 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6521697 | Miura et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6524334 | Thompson | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531559 | Smith et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6547814 | Edwin et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6547915 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6548612 | Smith et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6582113 | Rogers | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6599997 | Araki et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6616876 | Labrecque et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6620190 | Colone | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6638468 | Hill et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6673455 | Zumbrum et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6712919 | Ruefer et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6737158 | Thompson | May 2004 | B1 |
20010006268 | Delrosario et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010008672 | Norvell et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010018096 | Klare | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010021756 | Noda et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010033925 | Trapp et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020001704 | Ruefer et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020001705 | Ruefer et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004107 | Rogers | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020011684 | Bahar et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020025747 | Rock et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020031628 | Zumbrum et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045041 | Dillon et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020051879 | Tamai et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020053367 | Kamikawa et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020076542 | Kramer et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020096246 | Sennet et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020124953 | Sennett et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020132104 | Urakami et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140181 | Werner | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147486 | Soukup et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161149 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169265 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020197481 | Jing et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020197924 | Halley et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030010423 | Nakakado et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012905 | Zumbrum et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030017775 | Sowinski et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030054155 | Nomi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030062644 | Oyama et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030062650 | Martakos et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030065115 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030067097 | Yu et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069343 | Smith et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088264 | Spohn et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030102587 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030104741 | Kelmartin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030109654 | Kobayashi et al | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030113546 | Cho et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030118836 | Lee et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030139806 | Haverkost et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030204270 | Berman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030207118 | Fukushi | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216531 | Aten et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030228463 | Abusleme et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030230834 | Wynne et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019167 | Smith et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040038038 | Yeung | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040084304 | Thompson | May 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2417901 | Apr 1974 | DE |
0813331 | Dec 1997 | EP |
1107749 | May 2003 | EP |
11-80705 | Jul 1989 | JP |
04-353534 | Aug 1992 | JP |
WO9419170 | Sep 1994 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050153121 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09918844 | Jul 2001 | US |
Child | 10945520 | US | |
Parent | 09373348 | Aug 1999 | US |
Child | 09918844 | US |