The present invention relates generally to fuel systems and more particularly to a purge valve and vapor control system for use in a fuel system.
Increasingly strict environmental regulations are being promulgated by governmental agencies, including regulations restricting the emission to atmosphere of hazardous hydrocarbon fuel vapors. Such regulations are becoming increasingly common with respect to machines having small engines including both handheld and ground supported machines such as lawnmowers, leaf blowers, weed trimmers, power washers and the like.
To facilitate compliance with these regulations, various fuel vapor control systems and methodologies have been employed. For example, a carbon canister may be employed to receive fuel vapor from a fuel system, such as from a fuel tank, and to collect and hold the fuel vapor prior to it being purged to an intake manifold of the engine for combustion in the engine. During hot soak conditions, such as when a hot engine is shut off or a vehicle engine is exposed to hot ambient conditions for an extended period of time, fuel vapor generation may be sufficient to saturate or overload the fuel vapor canister. Once saturated or overloaded, the vapor canister is no longer effective. Passively purged vapor canisters may vent to the atmosphere excess fuel vapor which results in unacceptably high hydrocarbon fuel vapor emission to the atmosphere.
A vapor control system includes a vapor receiver having an inlet through which vapor is received, an outlet through which vapor is discharged, and a control valve having a first inlet in communication with the outlet of the vapor receiver, a second inlet in communication with a pressure source and an outlet. The control valve also includes a valve having a closure moveable between a first position preventing communication between the first inlet and the outlet, and a second position permitting communication between the first inlet and the outlet in response to a pressure signal over a threshold pressure provided from the pressure source through the second inlet. Movement of the closure to its second position permits routing of vapor from the vapor receiver, through the first inlet and out of the outlet of the control valve.
Desirably, in one presently preferred implementation, the pressure source is an intake manifold of an engine and the outlet of the control valve is also communicated with the intake manifold so that when the valve head is moved towards its second position, fuel vapor can be purged from the vapor receiver and delivered to the intake manifold of the engine for combustion therein. The closure preferably is carried by a flexible diaphragm actuated by change in pressure in the intake manifold which is communicated to the diaphragm through the second inlet. In this manner, the threshold pressure at which the closure and diaphragm are moved may be a function of the surface areas of the diaphragm exposed to the intake manifold pressure on opposed sides of the diaphragm.
Some of the objects, features and advantages that may be achieved by at least some embodiments of the present invention include providing a vapor control system that reduces emission to atmosphere of hydrocarbon fuel vapor, actively purges a vapor canister, provides a mechanical actuation and initiation of the canister purge cycle, does not require electricity, does not interfere with steady operation or acceleration of the engine, preferably operates only during deceleration of the engine when the vacuum in the inlet manifold is highest, operates during the frequent excursions of the throttle during normal governor operation, is of relatively simple design and economical manufacture and assembly, and has a long, useful life in service.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and best mode, appended claims and accompanying drawings in which:
Referring in more detail to the drawings,
As best shown in
To close the outlet 34 and prevent purging or venting of the vapor canister 22 therethrough, the diaphragm 28, or a valve head or closure 50 carried by the diaphragm 28, preferably engages the valve seat 44 to at least substantially inhibit fluid flow therethrough. The closure 50 may be separate from, connected to or carried by (as shown in
As best shown in
Desirably, the second inlet 32 is communicated with the intake manifold 24, to provide a pressure signal in the pressure signal chamber 40 that acts on an effective surface area of the diaphragm 28 exposed to the pressure signal chamber. The effective surface may include areas of the diaphragm directly exposed to the chamber 40 and, for example, the exposed area of a retainer 56 disposed between the diaphragm 28 and the spring 52. The outlet 34 preferably also is communicated with the intake manifold 24 of the engine 18 such as through a suitable conduit 60 providing a pressure signal through the orifice 54 and outlet passage 46 acting on the diaphragm 28 in an area bounded by the valve seat 44. In this embodiment, the effective surface area of the diaphragm 28 exposed in the pressure signal chamber 40 preferably is greater than the surface area bounded by the valve seat 44. Accordingly, the intake manifold pressure signal as applied to the opposed sides of the diaphragm 28 provides a net force tending to displace the diaphragm 28 away from the valve seat 44. The valve 14 can be calibrated to move between its first and second positions by, for example, communicating the pressure signal chamber 40 and chamber 42 with different locations in the intake manifold that have different pressure values or ranges, and based on the size of the orifice 54 and the force of the spring 52 provided on the diaphragm 28. In one implementation, the chamber 40 is communicated with a high-pressure differential area of the intake manifold and the chamber 42 is communicated with a lower pressure differential area of the intake manifold.
Preferably, the purge valve 14 is used with a speed controlled or governed vehicle that varies its throttle position in an effort to maintain a desired or preset engine speed. As the engine 18 decelerates, an at least momentary increase in vacuum pressure in the intake manifold 24 is communicated to the purge valve 14 through the outlet 34 and the second inlet 32. When the pressure signal is above a threshold value, the diaphragm 28 is moved to its second position with the closure 50 removed from the valve seat 44 permitting communication between the first inlet 30 and the outlet 34. Therefore, the vapor canister 22 can be purged of fuel vapor through the first inlet 30, and discharged from the purge valve 14 through the outlet 34 to the intake manifold 24 for combustion in the engine 18. During this activity, fresh air is vented into the vapor canister 22 through the atmospheric vent 70.
The flow rate of fluid from the vapor canister 22 and to the engine 18 through the purge valve 14 is controlled by the size of the orifice 54 in the outlet passage 46. Desirably, this avoids undo engine instability due to the varied ratio of air and fuel delivered to the engine 18 while purging or venting the vapor canister 22. Also, by purging the vapor canister 22 as the engine 18 decelerates or a throttle valve (not shown) is closed in a governed or speed controlled engine, the instability due to the varied air to fuel ratio can be minimized since variation in the air to fuel ratio is most tolerable during engine deceleration or throttle closing wherein the engine fuel demand is less than, for example, during engine acceleration.
Desirably, the purging of the vapor canister 22 occurs mechanically, without electricity, and is automatic in response to a suitable pressure signal from the intake manifold 24. The purge valve 14 itself could be mounted on the vapor canister 22, the engine 18, fuel tank 16, or any other suitable location.
While certain preferred embodiments have been shown and described, persons of ordinary skill in this art will readily recognize that the preceding description has been set forth in terms of description rather than limitation, and that various modifications and substitutions can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. By way of example without limitation, the closure 50 may be integral with the diaphragm 28, or coupled to, carried by or otherwise responsive to diaphragm movement to move the closure 50 relative to the valve seat 44 as desired. Also, the vapor canister may have a separate inlet and outlet, the inlet and outlet may be combined in one passage with in-flow and out-flow at different times, or the flow and passages in the vapor canister may be otherwise arranged as desired. Of course, still other modifications and substitutions can be made. The invention is defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3752134 | Hollis, Jr. | Aug 1973 | A |
3913545 | Haase et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3935850 | King | Feb 1976 | A |
4044743 | Eaton | Aug 1977 | A |
4086897 | Tamura et al. | May 1978 | A |
4127097 | Takimoto | Nov 1978 | A |
4153025 | Thornburgh | May 1979 | A |
4193383 | Rogers | Mar 1980 | A |
4212276 | Kaneda | Jul 1980 | A |
4308841 | Kingsley | Jan 1982 | A |
4326489 | Heitert | Apr 1982 | A |
4700683 | Uranishi et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4741317 | Yost | May 1988 | A |
5054508 | Benjey | Oct 1991 | A |
5069188 | Cook | Dec 1991 | A |
5099880 | Szlaga et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5409035 | Scott et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5448981 | Cook et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5529280 | Satoh et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5640993 | Kasugai et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5941218 | DeLand et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6003499 | Devall et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6058970 | Osaki et al. | May 2000 | A |
6119661 | DeLand et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6786227 | Weldon et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |