This application is related to U.S. Ser. No. 15/355,075 filed on Nov. 18, 2016 and U.S. Ser. No. 16/028,378 filed on Jul. 5, 2018, both of which are assigned to NXP USA, INC.
The present invention relates generally to wireless charging systems and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for determining a Quality (Q) factor used in the detection of foreign objects in wireless charging systems.
In a conventional wireless charging system, a power source (i.e., a power-transmitting node or TX) transmits power wirelessly via inductive coupling to a power sink (i.e., a power-receiving node or RX) that is placed on or at least near the TX in order to charge or power the RX. The inductive coupling between the TX and the RX is achieved via resonant transducer circuitry in each node having similar if not identical resonant frequencies. To determine whether an RX is present, the TX will periodically or intermittently transmit a ping message and, if present, an RX will respond to the ping message by transmitting an ack message acknowledging its presence. The TX then will respond to the ack message by transmitting power to the RX.
If a metal foreign objected (FO) is placed on or near a TX during a power-transfer session, inductive coupling between the TX and the FO may result in the generation of heat in the FO, which can cause damage to the FO, the TX, and/or the RX.
Q factor is a characteristic parameter for a resonator. When a FO is present, a measured Q factor will be different from the Q factor when no FO is present. This makes Q factor a good indication for foreign object detection (FOD). For example, when no RX and no FO are present, the TX will have a relatively high Q value. Because an RX's resonant transducer circuitry is designed to resonate at a similar frequency as a TX's resonant transducer circuitry, when an RX is present (but not an FO), the Q value will still be relatively high. However, when a random FO is present, like a coin, a key, or other metal object, then the Q value will be relatively low, whether or not an RX is also present.
There are many ways to calculate Q factor, like the voltage ratio method, the half bandwidth method, and the temporal decay method. However, these methods don't work well in noisy environments, and because of the coupling between a TX, a RX and a FO, the charging system is a noisy environment. Thus, it would be advantageous to have a robust method for calculating Q factor in a noisy environment.
Embodiments of the invention will become more fully apparent from the following detailed description, the appended claims, and the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals identify similar or identical elements.
Detailed illustrative embodiments of the invention are disclosed herein. However, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are merely representative for purposes of describing example embodiments of the invention. The invention may be embodied in many alternate forms and should not be construed as limited to only the embodiments set forth herein. Further, the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of example embodiments of the invention.
As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the,” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It further will be understood that the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” and/or “including,” specify the presence of stated features, steps, or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, steps, or components. It also should be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions/acts noted may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two figures shown in succession may in fact be executed substantially concurrently or may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality/acts involved.
In certain embodiments, the present invention is a transmitter (TX) for transmitting power wirelessly to a power-receiver (RX) in a wireless charging system. The TX comprises a resonator, a sampling and sensing circuit that measures peak values of a sinusoidal waveform of resonator energy, and a processor that uses the measured peak values to estimate parameters along the curve via exponential curve fitting to determine Q factor values that are used to detect the presence of a nearby foreign object (FO). The curve-fitting method allows for accurate parameter estimation, which enables robust measurement results even in noisy environments.
In one embodiment, the present invention is a machine-implemented method of determining a Q-factor of a resonant tank circuit of a power transmitting node in a wireless charging system. The method includes: exciting transitory damped oscillations of the resonant tank circuit; acquiring an array of digital signal samples that represent a waveform envelope of the transitory damped oscillations; using the samples to form a curve; and using parameters of the curve to calculate the Q-factor.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a power transmitting node of a wireless charging system, comprising a resonant converter that includes a switch network and a resonant tank circuit, a sampling and sensing circuit, and a processor operatively connected to the sampling and sensing circuit. The processor calculates a Q-factor of the resonant tank circuit by switching the switch network to excite transitory damped oscillations of the resonant tank circuit; acquiring a plurality of digital signal samples of the oscillations; defining a curve using the digital signal samples; and determining the Q-factor using parameters along the curve.
Referring now to
where A is the ratio of previous peak and next peak of the damping sinusoidal waveform. In implementation, generally three steps are used to calculate Q factor: (i) damping sinusoidal waveform period is detected with zero crossing points, (ii) adjacent peaks are searched at a certain interval of the waveform period in step 1, and (iii) equation (1) is used to calculate Q Factor using adjacent peaks.
However, in some cases, the damped sinusoidal waveform is not so ideal as the one shown in
In one embodiment, the resonant converter 42 includes a switch network 46, a resonant tank circuit 48, and an optional adapter circuit 50 that can be inductively coupled to the resonant tank circuit 48, e.g., as indicated in
The switch network 46 is implemented as a full-bridge inverter having four transistor switches Q1-Q4, each connected in parallel with a respective one of capacitors C1-C4 and a respective one of diodes D1-D4. In operation, the switches Q1-Q4 are turned ON and OFF to cause the full-bridge inverter to convert the input DC voltage Vin provided by the voltage source 52 into a square waveform (Vsw) that is used to drive oscillations of the resonant tank circuit 48.
In one embodiment, the switch network 46 is implemented as a half-bridge inverter. A person of ordinary skill in the art will understand that a half-bridge inverter can be obtained from the shown full-bridge inverter, e.g., by (i) connecting the node A1 to ground and (ii) removing the transistors Q2 and Q3, capacitors C2 and C3, and diodes D2 and D3. In some embodiments, the capacitors C1-C4 and the diodes D1-D4 are optional and can be omitted. A person of ordinary skill in the art will further understand that other alternative embodiments of the switch network 46 can instead be used in the TX 40.
The square waveform Vsw generated by the switch network 46 drives the resonant tank circuit 48 to generate a sinusoidal voltage Vr having a frequency that is close (but not identical) to the resonant frequency of the resonant tank circuit 48. In various embodiments, the amplitude of the sinusoidal voltage Vr can be controlled by (i) controlling the switching frequency of the transistors Q1-Q4 of the switch network 46 or (ii) with the switching frequency being fixed, controlling the duration of the ON pulses applied to the gates of the transistors Q1-Q4. In one embodiment, the train of ON pulses applied to the gates of the transistors Q1-Q4 is characterized by a relatively low duty cycle.
In one embodiment, the train of ON pulses is applied to the gates of the transistors Q1-Q4 in the following manner. The transistor pairs Q1/Q3 and Q2/Q4 are turned ON and OFF such that: (i) in a pulse cycle in which the transistors Q1 and Q3 are pulsed ON, the transistors Q2 and Q4 remain OFF, and (ii) in a pulse cycle in which the transistors Q2 and Q4 are pulsed ON, the transistors Q1 and Q3 remain OFF. In the alternative embodiment in which the switch network 46 is implemented as a half-bridge inverter, the transistors Q1 and Q4 are turned ON and OFF such that: (i) in a pulse cycle in which Q1 is pulsed ON, Q4 remains OFF, and (ii) in a pulse cycle in which Q4 is pulsed ON, Q1 remains OFF.
The resonant tank circuit 48 comprises an inductor L and a capacitor C that are connected in series. A person of ordinary skill in the art will understand that alternative embodiments of the tank circuit 48 can be used in the TX 40, such as a tank circuit with two series connected inductors and a capacitor or a tank circuit with 1 inductor and 2 series connected capacitors.
The TX 40 has the capability to measure the Q-factor of the tank circuit 48 when such measurement is deemed appropriate or necessary. For this purpose, the output of the tank circuit 48 is tapped using an electrical line 54 and applied to a sampling and sensing circuit 56. The sampling and sensing circuit 56 operates to appropriately condition a copy of the sinusoidal voltage Vr received on the line 54 to make a resulting conditioned electrical signal 58 suitable for digital signal processing by a processor or microcontroller 60. In one embodiment, the signal conditioning performed by the sampling and sensing circuit 56 includes changing the amplitude of the sinusoidal voltage Vr and adding a fixed DC offset voltage thereto. The sampling and sensing circuit 56 may also provide proper electrical isolation between the processor 60 and the resonant converter 42 in order for the electrical line 54 not to perturb the sinusoidal voltage Vr and the output voltage Vout. The sampling and sensing circuit 56 may comprise a capacitor to which the electrical line 54 is connected, where the capacitor operates to provide DC isolation between the sampling and sensing circuit 56 and the tank circuit 48. In one embodiment, the capacitor has a capacitance that is significantly smaller than the capacitance of the capacitor(s) used in the tank circuit 48, which serves to reduce the influence of the sampling and sensing circuit 56 on oscillations of the tank circuit 48. One end of the capacitor is connected to a node between two series connected resistors that operate as a voltage divider of the sampling and sensing circuit 56 and apply a DC offset to the AC signal passed from the capacitor to the node between the resistors. A diode pair may be provided to clip the resulting dc-offset waveform from the capacitor when the amplitude of that waveform is very large. For example, if the resistors have the same resistance, then the diode pair will clip the dc-offset waveform from the capacitor when the amplitude of that waveform is greater than Vcc/2, where Vcc is the power-supply voltage used in the sampling and sensing circuit 56. This feature of the sampling and sensing circuit 56 protects the downstream circuitry, such as an op-amp buffer and the controller 60, from possible unsafe signal levels. The output signal generated by the sampling and sensing circuit 56 (i.e., from an op-amp buffer having one input connected to the node between the resistors and the other input connected to its output) is the conditioned electrical signal 58 provided to the processor 60. The processor 60 can be implemented as a standalone or embedded microcontroller unit (MCU).
A method for determining the Q-factor of the tank circuit 48 that is implemented using the controller 60 is described in more detail with reference to
At step 76, the sampling and sensing circuit 56 determines the period of the damped sinusoidal waveform generated by the switching network 46 (as previously described). The zero-crossing points of the waveform have the same interval. To obtain a more precise period, it is preferred to measure several period values between adjacent zero-crossing points, and then calculate an average, by searching peak value position—sampling in a range of the waveform with finer resolution to find the peak value at step 78. The peak value is generally located ¼ period after the zero-crossing point. Then at step 80, peak values are sampled, where after peak value position is located, a sequence of peak values with the same period is sampled.
At step 82, the processor 60 performs exponential curve fitting. The curve fitting may be done in the following manner. Assume the damped sinusoidal waveform is:
y=ae−bt
We need to estimate b, which corresponds to the damping ratio of the waveform. The samples peak values are:
Do logarithm:
Substitute:
Use least square method to estimate A and b:
Finally, at step 84, Q factor calculation is performed by solving the following equation.
By using the curve fitting method, Q factor can be calculated accurately in a noisy environment, where such accuracy cannot be achieved using traditional methods.
The present invention, generating Q factor using logarithmic curve fitting, is especially advantageous in a power-transmitter that supports 2 or more channels of charging, so has 2 or more sets of coils, because the coils generate magnetic waves that can interfere with each other, causing the damped sinusoidal waveform to be distorted and a calculated Q factor incorrect. By employing curve-fitting, the distortions are removed so the Q factor calculation is more correct.
The TX 40 uses the Q factor to determine whether or not an FO is present. If no FO is present, then the TX 40 will start the power transfer to the RX. If an FO is present, then the TX 40 will refrains from performing power transfer.
The processor 60 may be implemented using dedicated hardware as well as hardware capable of executing appropriate software. The functions of the processor 60 may be provided by a single dedicated processor, by a single shared processor, or by a plurality of individual processors, some of which may be shared. Moreover, explicit use of the term “processor” should not be construed to refer exclusively to hardware capable of executing software, and may implicitly include, without limitation, digital signal processor (DSP), network processor, application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), and/or field programmable gate array (FPGA) circuitry. Other hardware, conventional and/or custom, may also be included.
Although the invention has been described in the context of a particular equations, those skilled in the art will understand that other equations can be implemented to achieve the same results of avoiding false positives (i.e., detecting FO removal when the FO remains) and false negatives (i.e., failing to detect FO removal), while achieving both true positives (i.e., correctly detecting FO removal) and true negatives (i.e., correctly detecting FO non-removal).
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, each numerical value and range should be interpreted as being approximate as if the word “about” or “approximately” preceded the value or range.
It will be further understood that various changes in the details, materials, and arrangements of the parts which have been described and illustrated in order to explain embodiments of this invention may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from embodiments of the invention encompassed by the following claims. It also will be understood by those of skill in the art that the described method can be used to calculate Q factor in noisy environments in fields not limited to wireless charging.
In this specification including any claims, the term “each” may be used to refer to one or more specified characteristics of a plurality of previously recited elements or steps. When used with the open-ended term “comprising,” the recitation of the term “each” does not exclude additional, unrecited elements or steps. Thus, it will be understood that an apparatus may have additional, unrecited elements and a method may have additional, unrecited steps, where the additional, unrecited elements or steps do not have the one or more specified characteristics.
Reference herein to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment can be included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments necessarily mutually exclusive of other embodiments. The same applies to the term “implementation.”
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2018 1 1506972 | Dec 2018 | CN | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5420518 | Schafer | May 1995 | A |
6471106 | Reining | Oct 2002 | B1 |
8983374 | Wiley | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9178387 | Mohammadian et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9450648 | Bastami | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9465064 | Roy et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9474031 | Sedzin et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9530558 | Nakano et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9806542 | Asanuma et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9851399 | Finkenzeller et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9966803 | Wang et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10018744 | Roy | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10218211 | Li et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10432036 | Li et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10686337 | Roy | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10763706 | Chen et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
20130069441 | Verghese | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130094598 | Bastami | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130257165 | Singh | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130257168 | Singh | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140015329 | Widmer | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140015522 | Widmer et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140049422 | Von Novak | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140084857 | Liu et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140111019 | Roy | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140333145 | Lee et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140361738 | Lee et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150198640 | Lee | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150318708 | Bartlett | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150372493 | Sankar | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160028248 | Asanuma et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160146886 | Finkenzeller et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160149442 | Asanuma | May 2016 | A1 |
20160190852 | Chiang et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170117755 | Muratov et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170271908 | Li et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180062504 | Mei et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180115197 | Li | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180241257 | Muratov | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190140489 | Liu | May 2019 | A1 |
20190393731 | Maniktala | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200169124 | Mehas | May 2020 | A1 |
20200212713 | Jiang et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200259373 | Park | Aug 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103907119 | Feb 2014 | CN |
205027804 | Feb 2016 | CN |
2443069 | Mar 1975 | DE |
Entry |
---|
Restriction/Election Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/355,075 dated Aug. 29, 2018, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/355,075 dated Sep. 19, 2018, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/355,075 dated Jan. 9, 2019, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200185974 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |