Patent Grant
9063149
The present application is being filed along with a Sequence Listing in electronic format. The sequence Listing filed, entitled 20071011SEQLSTREV, was created on Sep. 19, 2014 and is 53,202 bytes in size. The information in electronic format of the Sequence Listing is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This invention relates to a method of determining the absolute amount of a target polypeptide in a sample, said method comprising the following steps: (a) adding (aa) a fusion polypeptide to said sample, said fusion polypeptide comprising (i) at least one tag sequence and (ii) a subsequence of the target polypeptide; and (ab) a known absolute amount of a tag polypeptide comprising or consisting of said tag sequence according to (aa) to said sample, wherein said fusion polypeptide on the one hand is mass-altered as compared to said target polypeptide and said tag polypeptide on the other hand, for example, said fusion polypeptide on the one hand and said target polypeptide and said tag polypeptide on the other hand are differently isotope labeled; (b) performing a proteolytic digestion of the mixture obtained in step (a); (c) subjecting the result of the proteolytic digestion of step (b), optionally after chromatography, to mass spectrometric analysis; and (d) determining the absolute amount of said target polypeptide from (i) the peak intensities in the mass spectrum acquired in step (c) of said fusion polypeptide, said tag polypeptide and said target polypeptide and (ii) said known absolute amount of said tag polypeptide.
In this specification, a number of documents including patent applications and manufacturer's manuals are cited. The disclosure of these documents, while not considered relevant for the patentability of this invention, is herewith incorporated by reference in its entirety. More specifically, all referenced documents are incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual document was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics has become a method of choice to study proteins in a global manner (1-3). Mass spectrometry is not inherently quantitative but methods have been developed to address this limitation to a certain extent. Most of them are based on stable isotopes and introduce a mass shifted version of the peptides of interest, which are then quantified by their ‘heavy’ to ‘light’ ratio. Stable isotope labeling is either accomplished by chemical addition of labeled reagents, enzymatic isotope labeling or metabolic labeling (4-6). Generally, these approaches are used to obtain relative quantitative information on proteome expression levels in a light and a heavy labeled sample. For example, stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture SILAC (7, 8) is performed by metabolic incorporation of differently labeled, such as light or heavy labeled amino acids into the proteome. Labeled proteomes can also be used as internal standards for determining protein levels of a cell or tissue proteome of interest, such as in the spike-in SILAC approach (9).
Absolute quantification is technically more challenging than relative quantification and could so far only be performed accurately for a single or a small number of proteins at a time (10). Typical applications of absolute quantifications are the determination of cellular copy numbers of proteins (important for systems biology) or the concentration of biomarkers in body fluids (important for medical applications). Furthermore, any precise method of absolute quantification, when performed in more than one sample, also yields the relative amounts of the protein between these samples.
Several methods for absolute quantification have emerged over the last years including AQUA (11), QConCAT (12, 13), PSAQ (14), absolute SILAC (15) and FlexiQuant (16). They all quantify the endogenous protein of interest by the heavy to light ratios to a defined amount of the labeled counterpart spiked into the sample and are primarily distinguished from each other by either spiking in heavy labeled peptides or heavy labeled full length proteins. The AQUA strategy uses proteotypic peptides (17) which are chemically synthesized with heavy isotopes and spiked in after sample preparation. AQUA peptides are commercially available but expensive, especially when many peptides or proteins need to be quantified (see, for example, Kettenbach et al., Nat. Protoc. 2011, 6:175-86). Moreover, the AQUA strategy suffers from quantification uncertainties that are introduced due to spiking in of the peptide standard after sample preparation and enzymatic proteolysis, which is a late stage in the workflow. Furthermore, any losses of the peptides—for example during storage—would directly influence quantification results. The QconCAT approach is based on artificial proteins that are a concatamers of proteotypic peptides. This artificial protein is recombinantly expressed in Escherichia coli and spiked into the sample before proteolysis. QconCAT allows production of labeled peptides, but does not correct any bias arising from protein fractionation effects or digestion efficiency. The PSAQ, absolute SILAC and FlexiQuant approaches try to address these limitations by metabolically labeling full length proteins by heavy versions of the amino acids arginine and lysine. PSAQ and FlexiQuant synthesize full-length proteins in vitro in wheat germ extracts or in bacterial cell extract, respectively, whereas absolute SILAC was described with recombinant protein expression in E. coli. The protein standard is added at an early stage, such as directly to cell lysate. Consequently, sample fractionation can be performed in parallel and the SILAC protein is digested together with the proteome under investigation. However, these advantages come at the cost of having to produce full length proteins, which limits throughput and generally restricts these methods to soluble proteins.
Accordingly, there is an unmet need for improved or alternative means and methods of mass spectrometry-based absolute quantitation of peptides and polypeptides.
The present invention provides a method of determining the absolute amount of a target polypeptide in a sample, said method comprising the following steps: (a) adding (aa) a fusion polypeptide to said sample, said fusion polypeptide comprising (i) at least one tag sequence and (ii) a subsequence of the target polypeptide; and (ab) a known absolute amount of a tag polypeptide comprising or consisting of said tag sequence according to (aa) to said sample, wherein said fusion polypeptide on the one hand is mass-altered as compared to said target polypeptide and said tag polypeptide on the other hand, for example, said fusion polypeptide on the one hand and said target polypeptide and said tag polypeptide on the other hand are differently isotope labeled; (b) performing proteolytic digestion of the mixture obtained in step (a); (c) subjecting the result of proteolytic digestion of step (b), optionally after chromatography, to mass spectrometric analysis; and (d) determining the absolute amount of said target polypeptide from (i) the peak intensities in the mass spectrum acquired in step (c) of said fusion polypeptide, said tag polypeptide and said target polypeptide and (ii) said known absolute amount of said tag polypeptide.
The term “absolute amount” has its usual meaning and is to be held distinct from relative amounts, i.e. ratios, as they are commonly determined in expression analysis, be it by mRNA expression profiling or proteomics methods. In particular, it is understood that the term “absolute amount” refers to the copy number or the amount of substance of a given protein or polypeptide in, for example, a cell, or the amount in a defined volume, or in a sample such as ng/mL of a body fluid such as urine or plasma. In other words, said absolute amount may be expressed in terms of a concentration, a mass or amount of substance (in moles or number of molecules).
The term “polypeptide” is well established in the art and refers to a polycondensate of amino acids, preferably of the 20 standard amino acids. It is understood that the term “polypeptide” as used herein embraces also peptides, wherein peptides have a minimal length of two amino acids. On the other hand, the term “polypeptide” includes proteins, at least to the extent such proteins consist of a single chain. Proteins in turn may also comprise more than one polypeptide chain.
It is understood that the methods according to the invention are equally suitable to determine the absolute amounts of proteins, also to the extent proteins comprise more than one polypeptide chain. In such a case, and assuming the molar ratios of the polypeptide chains comprised in the protein are known, it may be sufficient to determine the absolute amount of one polypeptide comprised in the protein of interest. Alternatively, the absolute amount of more than one or all polypeptides comprised in the protein of interest may be determined by the methods according to the invention.
A “fusion polypeptide” according to the invention is a polypeptide which comprises at least two segments of different origin. More specifically, a fusion polypeptide according to the invention requires presence of a tag amino acid sequence and a subsequence of the target polypeptide comprised or suspected to be comprised in the recited sample. It is deliberately envisaged that more than one tag amino acid sequence is present. This is the subject of preferred embodiments discussed further below. Furthermore, this is exemplified in the enclosed examples and depicted in
The term “subsequence” in its broadest form refers to any partial sequence of a target polypeptide to be detected and furthermore includes the entire sequence of said target polypeptide. In a preferred embodiment, said subsequence is a partial sequence of the target polypeptide, the entire sequence of said target polypeptide being excluded. Preferred length ranges of said subsequence are discussed further below.
The term “isotope” refers to two or more nuclides with the same number of protons (atomic number) but different numbers of neutrons. Such difference in mass number provides for different peak positions of an isotope labeled compound or fragment on the one hand and its unlabeled counterpart on the other hand in a mass spectrum. Preferred isotopes are deuterium, 13C and 15N.
The term “labeled” refers to a frequency of isotopes which deviates from the naturally occurring frequency. In preferred embodiments, the term “isotope labeled” refers to a compound, moiety, fragment or molecule which, to the extent atoms with the same atomic number are considered, exclusively contains a given isotope. For example, a preferred isotope labeled lysine has 13C nuclides at all carbon positions. In preferred embodiments, one or more specific amino acids, such as all lysines and/or all arginines, are isotope labeled. Suitable isotope labeled amino acid residues are listed further below.
The term “differently labeled” or “differently isotope labeled” as used herein refers to a plurality of labeling schemes. In particular, it is sufficient for two polypeptides to be differently labeled, if one of them is labeled and the other one is not. Equally envisaged is that one of the polypeptides is isotope labeled in one specific way, whereas the other polypeptide is isotope labeled as well, but in a different way, the consequence being that both polypeptides do not exhibit the naturally occurring frequency of isotopes and can be distinguished in the mass spectrum. It is understood that “differently isotope labeled” according to the invention is such that, upon proteolytic digestion, (i) at least a first peptide is formed from the target polypeptide and at least a second peptide is formed from the subsequence thereof as comprised in the fusion polypeptide such that the first and second peptide are identical in sequence but differ in their mass, and (ii) at least a third peptide is formed from the tag polypeptide and at least a fourth peptide is formed from the tag sequence as comprised in the fusion polypeptide such that the third and fourth peptide are identical in sequence but differ in their mass. This can be achieved, for example, by the labeled polypeptides comprising internal labels, preferably each occurrence of one or more given amino acids being labeled, said given amino acids being preferably those which are comprised in the cleavage site recognized by the enzyme used for proteolytic digestion. Such preferred amino acids are, as described elsewhere herein, lysine and/or arginine. Taken together, it is preferred that said fusion polypeptide on the one hand and said target polypeptide and said tag polypeptide on the other hand are differently internally isotope labeled. The term “internal” as used herein in relation to labels is understood to distinguish from terminal labels.
Generally speaking, whenever reference is made to “differently labeled” or “differently isotope labeled” in the present disclosure, it is understood that these terms relate to a preferred embodiment. More generally, any means of mass-alteration including, though not confined to isotope labeling is envisaged. The terms “mass-alteration” and “mass-altered” as used herein refer to all those means and methods which provide for peptides (or polypeptides) obtained from different sources and identical in sequence to differ with regard to their mass. Isotope labeling is one preferred means of achieving this goal. An alternative method known in the art is the use of isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ). This method uses isotope-coded covalent tags; see, for example, Ross et al., Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3, 1154-69, 2004. Preferably, iTRAQ is based on a covalent labeling of the N-terminus and sidechain amines of peptides and polypeptides. Suitable agents are known in the art, examples of which include agents referred to as 4-plex and 8-plex. If it is stated herein that an entity A is mass-altered as compared to an entity B, it is understood that either entity A or entity B deviates from the naturally occurring form, for example by different isotope labeling or owing to the presence covalent tags in the sense of iTRAQ.
Turning to the requirement as recited in the main embodiment that “at least said fusion polypeptide on the one hand and said target polypeptide and said tag polypeptide on the other hand are differently isotope labeled”, it is noted that said target polypeptide and said tag polypeptide may be isotope labeled in the same way or according to different labeling patterns, or, if said fusion polypeptide is isotope labeled, both may be unlabeled. More specifically, at least the following labeling schemes are embraced. (1) Said fusion polypeptide is isotope labeled, and both said target polypeptide and said tag polypeptide are not isotope labeled, (2) said target polypeptide and said tag polypeptide are isotope labeled, and said fusion polypeptide is not isotope labeled, wherein target polypeptide and tag polypeptide are isotope labeled in the same way or according to different labeling patterns, (3) a polypeptide selected from target polypeptide, fusion polypeptide and tag polypeptide is not isotope labeled or isotope labeled according to a first pattern, a second polypeptide chosen from the same group is isotope labeled according to a second pattern, and the remaining polypeptide from the group is isotope labeled according to a third pattern. The three patterns (or two patterns in case one of the polypeptides is not isotope labeled) according to labeling scheme (3) may be implemented, for example, by using two or three isotope labeled forms of one or more given amino acids, said two or three isotope labeled forms differing in the total mass. An exemplary labeling scheme according to (3) is as follows: the target polypeptide is not isotope labeled, the fusion polypeptide is isotope labeled (“heavy weight” form), and the tag polypeptide is isotope labeled according to a different pattern such that it is provided, for example, either in a “middle weight” or an “extra heavy weight” form. Such a labeling scheme may be particularly preferred if it is suspected that a proteolytic product of the tag polypeptide could also be derived from the digestion of the sample, e.g. if the sample is human and the tag is a human protein or a domain or segment thereof.
The term “labeling scheme” as used herein distinguishes between different polypeptides. For a given labeling scheme, a class of polypeptides (classes being target polypeptides, tag polypeptides, and fusion polypeptides) is labeled in the same way, for example by incorporation of a 13C labeled lysine at all positions where a lysine occurs. A labeling scheme provides for different classes being differently labeled. On the other hand, the term “labeling pattern” distinguishes between differently labeled forms of a given peptide. For example, a specific polypeptide may be labeled by replacing all occurrences of lysine with 13C labeled lysine or by replacing all positions of arginine with 13C 15N labeled arginine, thereby rendering the labeling patterns differently.
Various means for isotope labeling are at the skilled person's disposal and include chemical addition of labeled reagents, enzymatic isotope labeling or metabolic labeling (4-6).
According to the invention it is preferred that the isotope labeling is introduced by metabolic labeling. In other words, the polypeptides to be used in the methods according to the invention, to the extent they are required to be labeled, are preferably obtained by means of production in biological systems, such as cell-free as well as cellular systems. For example, a host cell may be used which is auxotrophic for lysine and/or arginine, wherein at the same time isotope labeled lysine and/or arginine is provided in the growth medium. A preferred means of metabolic isotope labeling is stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). SILAC procedures are known in the art and described in the background section herein above as well as in the references cited in relation thereto which are herewith incorporated by reference. As mentioned above, to the extent isotope labeling makes use of isotopes with higher mass numbers, the labeled form is commonly referred to as “heavy” form, whereas the naturally occurring counterpart or the counterpart which is free or essentially free of the heavy isotope under consideration is commonly referred to as “light” form.
The recited “known absolute amount of a tag polypeptide” may be determined with methods established in the art. A preferred method is amino acid analysis. Amino acid analysis is typically provided as a service by a variety of companies. The method preferably includes the total hydrolysis of a given sample, the chemical derivatization of the obtained free amino acids, the separation of the derivatized amino acids, for example by reversed phase HPLC, and the subsequent interpretation of the result. The method is described in more detail in, for example, in Moore and Stein, J. Biol. Chem. 176, 367-388 (1948) as well as in Moore and Stein, J. Biol. Chem. 176, 337-365 (1948).
The methods according to the invention require, on the one hand, that a first subsequence of the fusion polypeptide is identical to a subsequence of the target protein, and on the other hand, that a second subsequence of the fusion polypeptide is identical to the tag polypeptide. Furthermore, even though the amino acid sequences are identical, the masses of the first subsequence of the fusion polypeptide and its counterpart in the target polypeptide need to be distinct. Likewise, the masses of the second sequence of the fusion polypeptide and the tag polypeptide also need to be distinct. This may be achieved by the labeling schemes described above. This allows for quantitative comparisons to be made between the tag sequence within the fusion polypeptide and the tag polypeptide as well as between said subsequence comprised in said fusion polypeptide and the target polypeptide polypeptide.
Step (b) provides for proteolytic digestion that, as is well established in the art, gives rise to fragments which can conveniently be handled in mass spectroscopy. Preferred enzymes to be used for proteolytic digestion are described further below. It is preferred that said proteolytic digestion is specific, i.e., that cleavage occurs at all cleavage sites of the enzyme used. On the other hand, and as described herein, the methods of the present invention provide for the avoidance of bias introduced by incomplete digestion.
Subsequent to proteolytic digestion, mass spectrometry analysis is performed. Ionized peptide molecules are transferred into the vacuum systems of the mass spectrometer. In a preferred mode of operation, widely known to the practitioners of the art, the mass spectrometer is operated so as to perform a mass spectrometric scan that records a mass spectrum of the peptides entering the instrument at that time. Quantification is based on the peaks present in this mass spectrometric (or MS) scan. The enclosed examples provide a more detailed account of suitable modes of operation of the mass spectrometer. Depending on the nature of the samples to be analyzed, the polypeptides suspected to be comprised in the sample and the available instrumentation, the skilled person can choose suitable modes of operation.
Given that proteolytic digestion is performed, the tag polypeptide comprising said tag sequence according to (aa) or a tag polypeptide consisting of said tag sequence according to (aa) may be used interchangeably. Preferably, in either case the same one or more tag fragments will be yielded during proteolytic digestion.
Prior to performing mass spectrometry analysis, the result of proteolytic digestion may be subjected to chromatography as is established in the art. Preferred means of chromatography are liquid chromatography (LC). In a preferred mode of operation, the peptide mixture is injected onto a liquid chromatographic column, separated by a gradient of organic solvent lasting several minutes or several hours and on-line electrosprayed.
Step (d) combines the information obtained in the mass spectrum (which can be viewed as relative intensities) with the known absolute amount of the tag polypeptide in order to determine absolute amounts, in particular the absolute amount of the target polypeptide comprised in the sample. To explain further, and using the terminology of first to fourth peptides introduced herein above, the absolute amount of a given target polypeptide may be determined, for example, as follows. Ratios of amounts of substance are identical to ratios of intensities in the MS spectrum of the corresponding peaks. Using the numbers from 1 to 4 as short hand designations of first to fourth peptide, the following applies. The amount of substance of the fourth peptide (proteolytic fragment derived from the tag sequence as comprised in the fusion polypeptide) N(4) can be determined according to N(4)=N(3) times I(4)/I(3). N(3) is the known absolute amount of the tag polypeptide. I(3) and I(4) are the corresponding peak intensities. Given the definition of the fusion polypeptide, N(2)=N(4) applies, i.e. the amounts of substance of the peptides formed from either part of the fusion polypeptide are identical. The amount of substance of the target polypeptide N(1) can then be determined as follows: N(1)=N(2) times I(1)/I(2). Making use of N(2)=N(4) and N(4)=N(3) times I(4)/I(3), it follows that N(1)=N(3) [I(1) I(4)/I(2) I(3)] which permits absolute quantitation of the target polypeptides based on peak intensities I(1) to I(4) and the known absolute amount of the tag polypeptide N(3). Note that in practice the ratios are usually determined as the mean of the ratios of several peptide intensities; i.e. more than one peptide pair covering the tag sequence and the target polypeptide sequence.
The methods according to the invention make use of specific labeling schemes of three distinct species, the labeling schemes being described above. A key feature of the methods of the invention is the use of fusion polypeptides, said fusion polypeptides containing at least one generic sequence, also referred to as “tag sequence” herein. The concomitant provision of a tag polypeptide as defined above in a known absolute amount permits calibration in a manner which advantageously is independent of the actual polypeptide to be quantitatively determined.
Deviating from a variety of prior art methods as discussed above, the methods of the present invention provide for early adding of the standard (in case of the main embodiment said known absolute amount of a tag polypeptide) in the entire workflow. As a consequence, downstream steps including proteolytic digestion and optionally chromatography is equally applied to both the standard and the constituents of the sample to be analyzed. Any variation in efficiency or performance of, for example proteolytic digestion, will equally affect all constituents of the mixture obtained in step (a), thereby avoiding any bias that could arise therefrom. In a preferred embodiment, no protein size-based methods such as size exclusion chromatography is used after said adding.
It is well known to practitioners of proteomics that accurate quantification of proteins of very low abundance proteins is challenging. However, the accuracy of quantification of the fusion protein standard itself does not depend on the cellular abundance or other attributes of the polypeptide to be determined, noting that the same amount of fusion polypeptide is preferably used in each instance of the methods according to the invention. Also, the purity of a composition comprising said fusion polypeptide to be added has no impact because the methods specifically determine the amount of the fusion polypeptide and not of total protein.
As discussed in more detail in the examples enclosed herewith, the methods according to the present invention provide for significantly improved accuracy in quantitative determination of cellular protein expression levels. Further advantages of the method are that it typically results in several quantifiable peptides for each fusion polypeptide, both for the accurate quantification of the standard and for the target polypeptide to be absolutely quantified. Furthermore, production of the standard can be streamlined because protein expression can be performed in a standard system (such as E. coli) and because a large number of fusion polypeptides can be produced under similar conditions as they only differ by a relatively short unique sequence in the preferred embodiment.
In a second aspect, the present invention provides a method of creating a quantitative standard, said method comprising the following steps: (a) providing a plurality of fusion polypeptides, each of said fusion polypeptides comprising (i) at least one tag sequence and (ii) a subsequence of a target polypeptide to be quantitatively determined, wherein all fusion polypeptides share at least one tag sequence, thereby obtaining the standard; (b) determining the absolute amounts of said fusion polypeptides by (ba) adding to one of said fusion polypeptides at a time a known amount of a tag polypeptide comprising or consisting of the tag sequence shared among the fusion polypeptides according to (a), wherein said fusion polypeptide is mass-altered as compared to said tag polypeptide, for example, said fusion polypeptide and said tag polypeptide are differently isotope labeled, (bb) performing proteolytic digestion of the mixture of one fusion polypeptide and said tag polypeptide obtained in step (ba); (bc) subjecting the result of proteolytic digestion of step (bb), optionally after chromatography, to mass spectrometric analysis; and (bd) determining the absolute amount of said one fusion polypeptide from (i) the peak intensities in the mass spectrum of fusion polypeptide and tag polypeptide and (ii) said known amount of said tag polypeptide, thereby obtaining the absolute amount of one of said fusion polypeptides at a time.
While the second aspect provides for the option of multiplexing as discussed further below, it is of note that said second aspect is not confined to the use of a plurality of fusion polypeptides. Accordingly, the present invention also provides a method of creating a quantitative standard, said method comprising the following steps: (a) providing one fusion polypeptide, the one fusion polypeptide comprising (i) at least one tag sequence and (ii) a subsequence of a target polypeptide to be quantitatively determined, thereby obtaining the standard; (b) determining the absolute amount of said fusion polypeptide by (ba) adding to the one fusion polypeptide a known amount of a tag polypeptide comprising or consisting of the tag sequence comprised in the one fusion polypeptide according to (a) wherein said fusion polypeptide is mass-altered as compared to said tag polypeptide, for example, said fusion polypeptide and said tag polypeptide are differently isotope labeled, (bb) performing proteolytic digestion of the mixture of one fusion polypeptide and said tag polypeptide obtained in step (ba); (bc) subjecting of the result of proteolytic digestion of step (bb), optionally after chromatography, to mass spectrometric analysis; and (bd) determining the absolute amount of said one fusion polypeptide from (i) the peak intensities in the mass spectrum of fusion polypeptide and tag polypeptide and (ii) said known amount of said tag polypeptide, thereby obtaining the absolute amount of the one fusion polypeptide.
In other words, part of a fusion polypeptide preparation is combined with a known amount of a tag polypeptide, wherein the fusion polypeptide is mass-altered as compared to the tag polypeptide. This binary mixture is subjected to proteolytic digestion, mass spectrometric analysis and quantitation to provide the absolute amount of the fusion polypeptides part, from which amount the exact concentration of the fusion polypeptide in the preparation can be calculated. Thus, a quantitative standard of a single fusion polypeptide has been provided. Then, at least part of the quantitative standard is added to the sample to be analyzed, after which proteolytic digestion of the obtained mixture is performed. The result of proteolytic digestion is subjected to to mass spectrometric analysis, optionally after chromatography. The absolute amount of the target polypeptide is then determined from (i) the peak intensities in the mass spectrum of the fusion polypeptide and the target polypeptide and (ii) the known absolute amounts of the fusion polypeptide, wherein said fusion polypeptide is mass-altered as compared to said target polypeptide.
Therefore, it is understood that said second aspect, in a more concise form covering both the use of one fusion polypeptide and a plurality thereof, relates to a method of creating a quantitative standard, said method comprising the following steps: (a) providing one or a plurality of fusion polypeptides, the one fusion polypeptide or each of said fusion polypeptides, respectively, comprising (i) at least one tag sequence and (ii) a subsequence of a target polypeptide to be quantitatively determined, wherein, to the extent said plurality of fusion polypeptides is provided, all fusion polypeptides share at least one tag sequence, thereby obtaining the standard; (b) determining the absolute amounts of said fusion polypeptide(s) by (ba) adding to the one fusion polypeptide or to one of said fusion polypeptides at a time, respectively, a known amount of a tag polypeptide comprising or consisting of the tag sequence comprised in the one fusion polypeptide or shared among the fusion polypeptides, respectively, according to (a), wherein said fusion polypeptide is mass-altered as compared to said tag polypeptide, for example, said fusion polypeptide and said tag polypeptide are differently isotope labeled, (bb) performing proteolytic digestion of the mixture of one fusion polypeptide and said tag polypeptide obtained in step (ba); (bc) subjecting of the result of proteolytic digestion of step (bb), optionally after chromatography, to mass spectrometric analysis; and (bd) determining the absolute amount of said one fusion polypeptide from (i) the peak intensities in the mass spectrum of fusion polypeptide and tag polypeptide and (ii) said known amount of said tag polypeptide, thereby obtaining the absolute amount of the one fusion polypeptide or of one of said plurality of fusion polypeptides at a time, respectively.
Related thereto, the present invention in a third aspect provides a method of determining the absolute amount of one or more target polypeptides in a sample, said method comprising the following steps: (a) optionally performing the method according to the second aspect; (b) adding the quantitative standard as defined in the second aspect to said sample; (c) performing proteolytic digestion of the mixture obtained in step (b); (d) subjecting the result of proteolytic digestion of step (c), optionally after chromatography, to mass spectrometric analysis; and (e) determining the absolute amounts of the target polypeptide(s) from (i) the peak intensities in the mass spectrum acquired in step (d) of fusion polypeptide(s) and target polypeptides and (ii) the known absolute amount(s) of said fusion polypeptide(s), wherein said fusion polypeptide(s) is/are mass-altered as compared to said target polypeptide(s), for example, said one or more target polypeptide(s) is/are differently isotope labeled as compared to said fusion polypeptide(s).
While the main embodiment provides for absolute quantitation of one polypeptide from a single mass experiment, the second and third aspects of the present invention relate to (i) preparation and quantitation of a standard and (ii) use of this standard in the quantitation of one or more of a plurality of polypeptides comprised in a sample. Importantly, such an approach is amenable to multiplexing. In other words, not only one, but also a plurality of polypeptides comprised in a sample can be concomitantly determined in a quantitative manner.
According to the second aspect, one or a plurality of fusion polypeptides is provided. According to step (b) of the second aspect, one fusion polypeptide at the time is combined with a known amount of a tag polypeptide. This binary mixture is subjected to proteolytic digestion, mass spectrometric analysis and quantitation to provide the absolute amount of one of said fusion polypeptides at a time. By performing step (b) of the second aspect for the one, more or all of the fusion polypeptides comprised in the standard, the standard is quantitatively characterized and can be used in a method in accordance with the third aspect of the present invention. The method of the second aspect provides in step (a) for the physical manufacture of the quantitative standard, and in step (b) for its characterization in terms of absolute amounts of the constituent fusion polypeptide(s). Preferred quantitative standards are also referred to as “PrEST master mix” herein.
A method according to the third aspect may, according to step (a), incorporate the method of creating a quantitative standard according to the second aspect of the invention in its entirety. Alternatively, step (a) may be omitted. In that case, it is understood that the quantitative standard to be added according to step (b) is characterized in accordance with step (b) of the second aspect.
Accordingly, in one embodiment, the internal standard (i.e. the fusion polypeptide) is thus quantified in a first step using an internal standard of the internal standard (i.e. the tag polypeptide), and a target protein in a sample is quantified in a subsequent second step using the quantified internal standard (i.e. the fusion polypeptide quantified in the first step). In this embodiment, the first step may be carried out at one site, such as at the premises of the company providing quantified fusion polypeptides, while the second step is carried out at another site, such as in a lab where proteins in biological samples are quantified for diagnostic purposes.
As recited in the third aspect, said one or more target polypeptides are mass-altered, preferably differently isotope labeled as compared to said fusion polypeptides. In other words, and in those cases where said fusion polypeptides are not isotope labeled, it is necessary to prepare a sample wherein the one or more target polypeptides comprised in the sample are isotope labeled. On the other hand, a requirement to prepare an isotope labeled sample does not arise for those embodiments falling under the third aspect where said fusion polypeptides are isotope labeled.
In a preferred embodiment, more than one fusion polypeptide comprising different subsequences of a target polypeptide in said sample are used. According to this embodiment, more than one fusion polypeptide is used in the quantitation of one given target polypeptide. This aspect is further described in the examples enclosed herewith and provides for improved accuracy and statistical significance.
In a further preferred embodiment, one or two tags are present in said fusion polypeptides, said tag(s) being selected from a purification tag and a solubility tag. This embodiment embraces the concomitant presence of two different tags. Preferred embodiments of either tag are described further below. It is understood that the solubility tag is preferably used as a quantitation tag (“tag sequence”) in accordance with the methods of the present invention.
In a further preferred embodiment of the methods of determining absolute amounts according to the invention, said sample comprises cells and/or body fluids. Said cells may be of various types or of a single type. Moreover, the cells may be embedded in one or more tissues. To the extent human cells are envisaged, it is preferred that such human cell is not obtained from a human embryo, in particular not via methods entailing destruction of a human embryo. On the other hand, human embryonic stem cells are at the skilled person's disposal. Accordingly, the present invention may be worked with human embryonic stem cells without any need to use or destroy a human embryo. The sample may comprise one or more body fluids, said body fluids preferably being selected from blood, blood serum, blood plasma, breast milk, cerebrospinal fluid, mucus, peritoneal fluid, pleural fluid, saliva, semen, sweat, tears, vaginal secretion and urine.
In a further preferred embodiment, said adding is effected prior to proteolytic digestion of the polypeptides. This embodiment relates to those cases where the sample to be analyzed comprises or consists of cells. Said adding refers to the addition of a fusion polypeptide and a tag polypeptide according to the main embodiment, or to adding the quantitative standard according to the third aspect of the invention. In either case, the early adding according to this embodiment provides for the methods to account for any bias possibly introduced by sample preparation and processing, in particular by the enzymatic digestion step. This is a further advantage as compared to those prior art methods which require a late spiking-in of the standard during the workflow.
In a further preferred embodiment, between two and 500 fusion polypeptides are used. As stated above, the second and third aspect of the invention provide for multiplexing. Preferred numbers of fusion polypeptides to be used in each instance of the method are between 2 and 200, such as between 2 and 100, including any integer value embraced by these lower and upper limits such as 50 fusion polypeptides. The examples enclosed herewith provide an account of excellent performance when using 43 fusion polypeptides.
In a further preferred embodiment, a solubility tag is present in each of said fusion polypeptides. A preferred solubility tag consists of the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1. The sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 is particularly advantageous in that the sequences obtained by tryptic digestion of the human proteome on the one hand and of the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 on the other hand are disjunct. In other words, a tryptic digestion of the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 yields peptides none of which is obtained from a tryptic digestion of the human proteome. The same applies at least for the majority of peptides obtained from the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 when the other preferred enzymes as disclosed herein are used for proteolytic digestion.
In a further preferred embodiment said subsequence of a polypeptide (a) consists of 15 to 205 amino acids; (b) comprises a proteotypic peptide; and/or (c) is selected to have minimal sequence identity to other proteins, excludes signal peptides and/or excludes sequences from transmembrane spanning regions. The subsequence recited in this embodiment is the subsequence of a target polypeptide as comprised in the fusion polypeptide according to the present invention. Feature (a) provides for a preferred length range of said subsequence. Further preferred lengths and length ranges are disclosed herein, in particular in the description of the fourth aspect of the invention. Such disclosure applies mutatis mutandis to the present preferred embodiment. It is noted that said length range is above the length range observed for tryptic peptides. As consequence, the present invention in this embodiment is distinguished from those prior art methods which make use of, for example, tryptic peptides or other peptides which are not amenable to cleavage by the proteolytic enzyme to be used for proteolytic digestion. Advantageously, and as stated above, subsequences in this length range give rise to a plurality of peptides upon proteolytic digestion, thereby enhancing accuracy of the quantitation.
The term “proteotypic” as used in this specific context refers to peptides which are frequently or always observed in the mass spectrum of a given polypeptide comprising said proteotypic peptide.
According to part (c) of this preferred embodiment, further features are provided which relate to the uniqueness of said subsequence (minimal sequence identity to other proteins, in particular to other proteins from the same proteome) or to easy handling and/or detection (exclusion of signal peptides and transmembrane segments).
In a further preferred embodiment, said known absolute amount of said tag polypeptide is determined by amino acid analysis. Preferred means and methods of amino acid analysis are described herein above.
In a fourth aspect, the present invention provides a fusion polypeptide for the quantification of a target polypeptide by mass spectroscopy, wherein: said fusion polypeptide consists of 35 to 455 amino acid residues and comprises (i) a target region, which is a fragment of the target polypeptide, and (ii) a tag region, which is not a fragment of the target polypeptide, said target region consists of 15 to 205 amino acid residues and comprises at least two signature regions; said tag region consists of 20 to 250 amino acid residues and comprises at least two signature regions; and each signature region has the structure Y-Z-X4-28-Y-Z, wherein all Y:s are selected from one of (i)-(iv), wherein (i) is R or K, (ii) is Y, F, W or L, (iii) is E and (iv) is D, and each X and each Z are independently any amino acid residue, provided that the Z:s are not P if the Y:s are selected from (i)-(iii); and each signature region comprises at least one amino acid residue comprising a heavy isotope.
This aspect relates to fusion polypeptides that may also be employed in the methods according to the invention. As throughout the specification, the target polypeptide may be any polypeptide, in particular a polypeptide naturally occurring in the proteome of any organism or cell in any state. The two regions comprised in the fusion polypeptide according to the fourth aspect of the invention are chosen such that each of them comprises at least two specific structural elements referred to as “signature regions”. Importantly, the N- and C-terminal amino acids of each signature region are selected such that they are recognized by a protease suitable for the mass spectrometry protocol described herein. The amino acids of (i)-(iv) are thus based on the selectivity of the following proteases: trypsin, which cleaves on the carboxyl side of arginine (R) and lysine (K) residues unless followed by proline (P); chymotrypsin, which cleaves on the carboxyl side of tyrosine (Y), phenylalanine (F), tryptophan (W) and leucine (L) residues unless followed by proline (P); Lys-C, which cleaves on the carboxyl side of lysine (K) residues unless followed by proline (P); Glu-C, which cleaves on the carboxyl side of glutamate (E) residues unless followed by proline (P); Arg-C, which cleaves on the carboxyl side of arginine (R) residues unless followed by proline (P); and Asp-N, which cleaves on the amino side of aspartate (D) residues. This design principle of the fusion polypeptides ensures that, upon proteolytic digestion, at least two mass-altered proteolytic products are obtained from the target and tag region, respectively. It is to be understood that the same Y residue may constitute the carboxylic end of a first signature region and the amino end of a second signature region.
The general term “mass-altered” is used herein as defined above. Preferably, it refers to a frequency of at least one isotope which deviates from the naturally occurring frequency/ies thereof, preferably to the exclusive occurrence of at least one heavy isotope, heavy isotopes preferably being selected from D, 13C and 15N.
In a preferred embodiment of the fusion polypeptide of the invention, said tag region or said tag polypeptide, respectively, corresponds to, i.e. comprises or consists of a solubility tag or a fragment thereof, said solubility tag being selected from Maltose-binding protein (MBP), Glutathione-S-transferase (GST), Thioredoxin (Trx), N-Utilization substance (NusA), Small ubiquitin-modifier (SUMO), a Solubility-enhancing tag (SET), a Disulfide forming protein C (DsbC), Seventeen kilodalton protein (Skp), Phage T7 protein kinase (T7PK), Protein G B1 domain (GB1), Protein A IgG ZZ repeat domain (ZZ) and Albumin Binding Protein (ABP). The structures of these solubility tags are known in the art and readily available to the skilled person. It follows from the above definition that the solubility tag (or fragment thereof) is mass-altered when constituting the tag region of the fusion polypeptide of the fourth aspect.
Preferably, said fragment is chosen such that the solubility conferring properties are retained or not significantly compromised. Whether or not this is the case can be determined by the skilled person without further ado, for example, by performing solubility assays for fusion constructs comprising a test polypeptide on the one hand and the solubility tag at issue or a fragment thereof on the other hand. By comparing solubility of constructs comprising the entire solubility tag with constructs comprising a fragment thereof, it can be determined whether and to which extent the solubility conferring properties are retained by the fragment under consideration.
For reasons discussed above, the sequences of the at least two signature regions of the tag region are, according to one embodiment, distinct from any sequence derivable from the human proteome by means of proteolysis.
The fusion polypeptide of the fourth aspect may for example be used in a diagnosis of a medical condition in a subject comprising the ex vivo quantification of a target polypeptide in a sample from the subject. Whenever human samples are analyzed, it may be beneficial if the tag region is not a human polypeptide. Thus, in an embodiment of the fourth aspect, the amino acid sequence of the tag region is not an amino acid sequence of a human protein or a fragment thereof. As human proteins may have high homology to proteins of other eukaryotes, it may be particularly preferred if the tag region has the amino acid sequence of a prokaryotic (e.g. bacterial) protein or a fragment thereof.
As already noted above, a particularly preferred tag region or tag polypeptide has the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1.
According to further preferred embodiments, said tag region consists of 40 to 150 amino acids, and independently said target region consists of 20 to 150 amino acids, such as 25 to 100 amino acids. Moreover, it is preferred that the fusion polypeptide consists of 80 to 300, more preferably 100 to 200 amino acids.
According to further preferred embodiments, said target region, and independently said tag region, comprises at least 3 such as at least 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 signature regions. These preferred embodiments provide for an increasing number of proteolytic products to be formed from each of said regions when said fusion polypeptide is brought into contact with a proteolytic enzyme, proteolytic enzymes being further detailed below.
According to a further preferred embodiment, each signature region independently comprises at least 2, such as at least 3 or 4 amino acid residues comprising a heavy isotope.
LysC and trypsin has been found to be particularly suitable proteolytic enzymes (see e.g. the examples below). According to a further preferred embodiment, said Y:s are thus selected from R and K.
As stated above, preferred heavy isotopes are to be selected from deuterium (D), 13C and 15N.
Normally, the amino acid residues comprising a heavy isotope of the fusion polypeptide comprises more than one heavy isotope. A higher number of incorporated heavy isotopes may be preferred as it provides a larger mass shift. In a further preferred embodiment, the at least one amino acid residue comprising a heavy isotope is selected from L-arginine-13C6, L-arginine-13C615N4, L-arginine-13C615N4D7, L-arginine-15N4D7, L-arginine-15N4, L-lysine-13C615N2, L-lysine-15N2, L-lysine-13C6, L-lysine-13C615N2D9, L-lysine-15N2D9, L-lysine-D4, L-methionine-13CD3, L-tyrosine-13C9, L-tyrosine-15N and L-tyrosine-13C915N. Such heavy isotope labeled amino acids are well known in the art and available from a variety of manufacturers. The use of one or more of these amino acids is preferred for any labeling schemes and patterns according to the present invention. In a preferred mode, all lysines and arginines are labeled so that tryptic peptides typically contain one labeled amino acid as trypsin specifically cleaves C-terminally to arginine and lysine.
According to a further preferred embodiment, the fusion polypeptide further comprises a purification tag.
Moreover, to allow for an efficient expression of the fusion polypeptide, it is preferred that the target region of the fusion polypeptide does not correspond to a transmembrane spanning region of the target polypeptide. Further, it is also preferred that the target region of the fusion polypeptide does not correspond to a signal peptide of the target polypeptide, since the signal peptides are often cleaved off in a mature version of the target polypeptide.
In a preferred embodiment of any of the methods according to the invention as described above, said fusion polypeptide(s) is/are as defined in accordance with the fourth aspect of the present invention as well as embodiments referring back thereto.
Preferred purification tags are to be selected from His tag, a FLAG tag, a SBP tag, a myc tag and a OneStrep tag.
For a user quantifying one or more target proteins or polypeptides in a sample according to the present disclosure, it may be convenient to obtain the fusion polypeptide(s) necessary for the quantification preloaded onto a solid phase suitable for the proteolytic digestion. Such solid phase may be a solid support, a column or a filter. Preferably, the amount of fusion polypeptides on said support in the column is predetermined. Thus, the step of spiking the sample with the fusion polypeptide(s) is not in the responsibility of the user, which also reduces the risk of human error in the procedure. In a fifth aspect, the present invention thus furthermore relates to a column in or onto which at least one fusion polypeptide according to the fourth aspect is arranged. Means of arranging are within the skills of the skilled person and include covalent attachment as well as non-covalent adsorption or absorption.
A proteolytic enzyme such as trypsin, chymotrypsin, Lys-C, Glu-C or Asp-N may also be arranged in or onto the column. When using such a column, the user does not have to add the proteolytic enzyme for the digestion, which may be convenient and further reduce the risk of human error. According to one embodiment, the fusion polypeptide(s) are separated from the proteolytic enzyme on the support/in the column so as to prevent any proteolytic digestion before the sample is added.
The present invention in a sixth aspect provides a kit comprising: (a) at least one fusion polypeptide according to the fourth aspect; and (b) (i) a second polypeptide comprising or consisting of the same amino acid sequence as the tag region as defined in accordance with the fourth aspect but being differently isotope labeled compared to said tag region and/or (ii) a proteolytic enzyme, such as trypsin, chymotrypsin, Lys-C, Glu-C or Asp-N. The combination of the products necessary for the quantification protocol described herein into a kit may provide for increased reproducibility and decreased risk of human error at the users side. The second polypeptide of the sixth aspect may for example be “unlabeled”. It may also be “middle weight” or “extra heavy weight”. Such embodiments are discussed above in connection with the method aspects.
In a preferred embodiment of the kit, the at least one fusion polypeptide is arranged in or onto a column according to the fifth aspect of the invention. In a further preferred embodiment of the kit, said second polypeptide is provided in a known absolute amount.
In a further aspect, the present invention relates to use of a quantitative standard as defined in the second aspect or of a fusion polypeptide according to the fourth aspect of the invention as a reference in a target polypeptide quantification. In a preferred embodiment of the use according to the invention, said quantification is effected by mass spectrometry.
Various further embodiments of the use aspect are described in connection with the other aspects above.
The figures show:
The examples illustrate the invention:
Protein Epitope Signature Tags—The short protein fragments, i.e. the subsequences of target polypeptides, were produced in high-throughput by the Human Protein Atlas where they are used as antigens for antibody production (18, 19). In brief, suitable Protein Epitope Signature Tags (PrESTs) representing unique regions of each target protein were designed using the human genome sequence as template (EnsEMBL). Unique PrESTs with a size between 50 to 150 amino acids and low homology to other human proteins were selected, including epitope- and domain-sized similarities to other proteins, signal peptides and transmembrane regions (18). The cloning, protein expression and purification were performed as previously described (19, 20). For optimal storage PrESTs were lyophilized and dissolved in 8M urea and stored at −20° C. until further use. To ascertain that the PrESTs had an endogenous counterpart in HeLa cells, we selected 50 proteins spread over the abundance range of a HeLa proteome that we had measured at a depth of about 4,000 proteins. Proteins were picked without regards to specific protein classes, cellular localizations or functions. Of these 50 proteins, 43 were readily available from the Protein Atlas pipeline in recombinantly expressed form. For multiplexing experiments these 43 PrESTs were mixed together—each at the appropriate concentration. This ‘master mix’ that was then spiked into cell lysates.
Cell culture—For SILAC labeling, HeLa cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) containing 10% dialyzed fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco). Heavy arginine (high purity Arg10, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories) and heavy lysine (high purity Lys8, Cambridge Isotope Laboratory) were added to a final concentration of 33 μg/ml or 76 μg/ml, respectively. After six passages cells were fully labeled as assessed by mass spectrometry. Cells were counted using a Countess cell counter (Invitrogen) and aliquots of 106 cells were snap frozen and stored at −80° C.
Protein expression and purification of ABP (Albumin Binding Protein)—The expression vector pAff8c (Human Protein Atlas) was modified via SLIC cloning (21) inserting a OneStrep affinity tag to the C-terminus of the Albumin Binding Protein (ABP). To express heavy labeled ABP in E. coli, an expression strain auxotrophic for arginine and lysine was used (33). Cultures were grown in PA5052 minimal autoinduction media as previously described in (22) but with the addition of 18 normal (‘light’) amino acids and heavy arginine and lysine. Cultures were grown overnight and harvested at an OD600 of about 5.7. E. coli cells were lysed in 100 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl and Protease Inhibitor (Roche) using a Bioruptor (Diagenode). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation and soluble ABP was purified using affinity chromatography on a StrepTap Hitrap column (GE Healthcare) coupled to an ÄKTA system. The purity of the protein was evaluated by mass spectrometry via an in solution digest followed by LC MS/MS. Abundances of ABP and contaminants were estimated by adding the signal for their most intense peptides. ABP was dialyzed in PBS, aliquoted, snap-frozen and stored at −80° C. The concentration of purified ABP was measured by amino acid analysis (Genaxxon BioScience GmbH).
Sample preparation—HeLa cells were lysed in 100 mM Tris, 4% SDS, 100 mM DTT, incubated for 5 min at 95° C. and disrupted using a Bioruptor. The lysate was cleared by centrifugation through SpinX filters (22 μm, Corning). The PrESTs were added at appropriate concentrations (see main text) to labeled HeLa cells and the samples were further processed by the FASP method (23). In brief, proteins were captured on a 30 kDa filter and SDS was exchanged with a urea containing buffer. Proteins were alkylated with iodoacetamide and trypsinzed (Promega). Further peptide separation was performed using pipette-based six fraction SAX as described (24).
The PrESTs and ABP were mixed and solubilized in denaturation buffer (6 M urea, 2 M thiourea in 10 mM HEPES, pH 8), reduced with DTT and subsequently alkylated with iodoacetamide. The protein mixture was digested with LysC (Wako) for 3 h, diluted with ammonium bicarbonate and further digested with trypsin overnight. The digestion was stopped by acidifying with TFA and desalted on C18-Empore disc StageTips (25).
Liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry—Analysis of the light PrESTs spiked into HeLa cells was performed on a LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled to an Easy nano-HPLC via a nanoelectrospray ion source (Proxeon Biosystems, now Thermo Fisher Scientific). The peptides were separated on a 15 cm fused silica emitter packed in-house with reversed phase material ReproSil-Pur 120 C18-AQ 3 μm resin (Dr. Maisch GmbH) and eluted with a 205 min gradient from 5-35% buffer B (80% acetonitrile, 0.5% acetic acid). The mass spectrometer was operated in a data dependent fashion to automatically measure MS and consecutive MS/MS. LTQ-Orbitrap full scan MS spectra (from 300 to 1650 m/z) were acquired with a resolution of 60,000 at m/z 400. The seven most abundant ions were sequentially isolated and fragmented in the linear ion trap using collision induced dissociation (CID) followed by analysis in the linear ion trap.
Analysis of the PrESTs spiked into HeLa cells was performed on an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled to an Easy nano-HPLC via a nanoelectrospray ion source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The peptides were separated on a 20 cm column packed in-house using C18-AQ 1.8 μm resin (Dr. Maisch GmbH) and eluted with a 205-min gradient from 5-35% buffer B. The mass spectrometer was operated in a data dependent fashion to automatically measure MS and 10 consecutive MS/MS applying higher energy collision dissociation (HCD) (34). LTQ-Orbitrap full scan MS spectra (from 100 or 300 to 1650 m/z) were acquired with a resolution of 60,000 at m/z 400.
The PrEST-ABP peptides were analyzed online on the Exactive instrument with HCD option (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the same nano-HPLC setup as described above. The peptides were eluted with a linear gradient with 5-30% buffer B over 40 min. The Exactive mass spectrometer identified peptides with All Ion Fragmentation (AIF) by performing alternating MS scans (300-1600 m/z) of the precursor ions and all ion fragmentation scans (100-1600 m/z) using stepped HCD fragmentation (26). Both scans were acquired at a resolution of 100 000 at m/z 200.
Data analysis—Acquired data were analyzed with MaxQuant (27) (version 1.1.1.36) using the human IPI database (v 3.68-87,083 entries). Common contaminants and the sequence of the ABP solubility tag were added to this database. For peptide identification we used Andromeda, a probabilistic search engine incorporated in to the MaxQuant framework (28). Carbamidomethylation of cysteine was included in the search as a fixed modification and methionine oxidation as well as N-terminal acetylation were included as variable modifications. We allowed two miscleavages and required a minimum of six amino acids per identified peptide. The initial mass tolerance for precursor ions or fragment ions was set to 6 ppm and fragment masses were allowed to deviate by up to 0.5 Th. For statistical evaluation of the data obtained, the posterior error probability and false discovery rate (FDR) were used. The FDR was determined by searching a reverse database and was set to 0.01 for peptide identification.
The AIF data was processed as described above except that up to 50 peaks were analyzed per 100 m/z with a tolerance of 15 ppm. The precursor ion mass was matched with the possible fragment ion candidates on the basis of the cosine correlation value of at least 0.6 (26).
Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay—Absolute amounts measurements of proto-oncogene c-Fos and Stratifin (14-3-3σ) was carried out by ELISA. The kits were purchased from USCNK Life Science and performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The HeLa cells were lysed in PBS, RIPA 1 (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40) or RIPA2 (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40; 0.1% SDS) with protease inhibitors. The cells were disrupted by 3 freeze-thaw cycles and sonication using the Biorupter. For the ELISA the samples were diluted 1:10. Fluorescence activity was measured by a microplate reader (Tecan) and converted to actual concentration by a standard curve.
Unlike relative quantification, absolute quantification may be effected as a two step process that firstly requires measurement of the absolute amount of the standard and secondly the relative amount of the standard compared to the analyte of interest. Determination and subsequent control of the level of standard is by no means trivial and can easily be the step that limits the overall accuracy of the approach. Below, we first describe a generic method to determine the absolute amount of each PrEST with high accu racy.
Then we construct a ‘master mix’ of different PrESTs and evaluate the ability of the SILAC-PrEST method to accurately quantify cellular proteins. We then apply the master mix to determine the copy numbers of 37 proteins in a cancer cell line. Finally, we describe an alternative workflow for the quantification of single proteins of interest, in which the two steps are combined into one LC MS/MS analysis.
Accurate measurement of PrEST concentrations—Each PrEST is already fused to the Albumin Binding Domain (ABP), a solubilization tag of 120 amino acids. In silico digest of ABP results in 40 tryptic peptides with a length between 6 and 30 amino acids (Suppl. Table 1). We recombinantly expressed a heavy SILAC labeled version of the ABP protein tag. When necessary, we used a dual affinity approach based on an N-terminal His-tag and a C-terminal OneStrep tag to generate highly purified protein fragment and to ensure that only full length ABP was obtained. The absolute concentration of ABP protein fragment was determined by amino acid analysis, which is the most accurate method for protein quantification, but which is only applicable to highly purified proteins in relatively large amounts. Heavy SILAC incorporation into ABP was 99% and its purity was about 97% as judged by mass spectrometry (see Experimental Procedures). Because these two factors operate in a compensating direction and because of the small size of the effect, the measured concentration of ABP was not adjusted for them.
LC MS/MS of ABP indeed revealed many readily detectable tryptic peptides (see below). Each of the 43 PrESTs from the Protein Atlas Project was separately mixed with a known amount of labeled ABP as schematically outlined in
We therefore decided to perform this analysis on an economical and robust benchtop Orbitrap instrument rather than on a Velos instrument. The Exactive instrument cannot isolate peptide precursors, therefore we identified the peptides by All Ion Fragmentation (AIF) (26) in 1 h runs. Typically, at least eight labeled ABP peptides could be quantified against the corresponding ABP peptides from the PrESTs, leading to a median coefficient of variation (CV) of 7% for PrEST quantification (
To overcome the step of measuring the PrESTs concentration, which limits overall throughput, the heavy PrESTs were measured by static nanoelectrospray on an automated chip-based system (TriVersa Nanomate). This enabled higher throughput measurements of these simple mixtures of ABP peptides using low sample consumption. The peptide ratio showed a median coefficient of variation 5.5%, an improvement over the Exactive based measurement of 7%.
Importantly, a particular PrEST quantification can be repeated at this stage until a desired accuracy is achieved. Here, this was not done, since the accuracy of PrEST quantification was estimated to be higher than that of the other steps in the workflow. A few typical examples of results from the PrEST quantification are shown in
PrEST master mix and endogenous protein quantification—Having quantified the PrEST amounts we proceeded to measuring protein expression levels in a human cancer cell line. For convenience we used unlabeled PrESTs and quantified against heavy SILAC labeled HeLa cells. Since digested total cell lysates consist of hundreds of thousands of tryptic peptides, the addition of a single or even a large number of PrEST does not change the overall complexity of the mixture. On the basis of the quantitative amounts established above, we here mixed 43 PrESTs together. In initial experiments we used equimolar mixtures of PrESTs, which were spiked into HeLa lysate in different amounts. The measured SILAC ratios established appropriate levels of each PrEST in the master mix, such that the SILAC ratios were within the most accurately quantifiable range, i.e. relatively close to one to one.
The master mix with appropriate levels of all the 43 PrESTs was spiked into the lysate of SILAC labeled cells. The mixture was digested according to the FASP protocol followed by SAX fractionation and resulting in six fractions that were separately measured with 4 h gradients on an LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer. We were able to quantify 37 of the 43 proteins targeted by our PrEST master mix.
Proteins were generally quantified with several PrEST derived peptides (average 3.7 and median 3), leading to an overall median CV of 18% (Supplementary Table 2). The results for these 37 protein targets are shown in
To independently assess the precision of this step of absolute protein quantification, we compared the ratios determined from ‘limit tryptic peptides’ (those without internal arg or lys) to those determined from the longer versions of the peptide containing one or two missed tryptic cleavage sites. These peptides are very problematic for peptide standard based methods such as AQUA, but in our measurements very similar ratios were measured for such peptides. This shows that digestion proceeded identical for PrEST and endogenous protein (Table 1). Thus, far from introducing uncertainty, in the SILAC-PrEST approach these peptides can provide additional quantification information.
To assess the degree of variability associated with both steps of the absolute quantification procedure, we repeated the entire workflow two more times, including PrEST quantification and master mix generation as well as measurement of cellular abundance of the target proteins. This analysis showed that the standard errors of the mean associated with all steps together are on average 24%. This value is excellent and to our knowledge the most accurate determination of cellular expression levels reported so far. Even more importantly, the errors of each of the step in the workflow for each of the proteins are immediately apparent from the individual CVs. Thus all protein expression level measurements can be classified and accepted or discarded according to the confidence of measurements.
Protein copy number determination in HeLa cells—Next we used the absolute values for protein amounts in our HeLa cell lysate to calculate the corresponding copy numbers in cells. HeLa cells numbers were determined automatically in a cell counter (see Experimental Procedures). Given the known amount of each PrEST and their SILAC ratios with respect to the endogenous proteins we determined the cellular copy numbers of 37 different proteins. Very high accuracy of absolute quantification to within a standard error of 25% was achieved for 30 of 37 proteins (Table 2).
Cellular copy numbers are only known for very few proteins and it is therefore interesting to relate these copy numbers to the known functions of the proteins (Suppl. Table 3). The cytoskeletal protein vimentin forms intermediate filaments and was the most abundant protein with 20 million copies per cell. At the other extreme, the transcription factor and oncogene FOS is present in about 4,000 copies in our HeLa cell sample. As expected, proteins involved in cell signaling are generally expressed at lower values—as an example even the scaffolding factor mitogen-activated protein kinase scaffold protein 1 (MAP2K1IP1) is present at only 160,000 copies. However, ubiquitous signaling factors with a general chaperone-like role—such as 14-3-3 isoforms—are very highly expressed (14-3-3 sigma; 2.1 million copies). Two members of the mitochondrial ribosome have about 200,000 copies in this cell line (L23 and L5), whereas a third (L35) has about 500,000 (Note that not all ribosomal protein subunits have equal stoichiometry). The mitochondrial genome only encodes 13 genes therefore it is perhaps surprising that proteins involved in their translation are needed in such high copy numbers. A member of the respiratory chain, ATP5B, has about 5 million copies per HeLa cells—about five fold higher than PSMC3, a regulatory component of the proteasome. The T-complex is a member of a chaperone system and as expected it has a very high copy number (about 4 million). Fatty acid synthase, a classical enzyme, is expressed at 3.4 million copies, whereas another enzyme acyl coenzyme A thioester hydrolase (ACOT7) is expressed about seven-fold lower (450,000 copies). Such expression numbers could be interesting for modeling metabolic pathways. These are anecdotal examples but they illustrate that knowledge of the absolute expression levels of cellular proteins can contribute to the understanding of their roles in the cell.
Absolute Quantification using heavy PrESTs—Above we used already expressed and purified PrESTs and quantified against heavy ABP protein and heavy SILAC-labeled cell lysate. While convenient to determine copy numbers in cell lines, in other applications it would be more appropriate to express heavy labeled PrESTs, which can then be mixed into any proteome of choice—including tissue and clinical body fluid samples. To apply our absolute quantification approach to non-labeled samples we expressed 28 of the PrESTs in heavy SILAC labeled E. coli, purified them and prepared a heavy master mix. To streamline quantification of PrEST levels, we developed an automated set up employing static nanoelectrospray (Advion NanoMate; see Example 1). As expected, spiking the heavy master mix into normal, non-SILAC labeled cells allowed equally straightforward quantification of the targeted proteins, with good correlation to the previous experiment (
Absolute quantification in single experiments—We also wished to develop a variation on the SILAC-PrEST strategy to quantify single protein target. In this case, the two experimental steps involved in absolute protein quantification can be collapsed into one as outlined schematically in
This single-plex method for quantification was performed for three different HeLa proteins in which the SILAC-labeled cell lysate and SILAC-labeled ABP was quantified against unlabeled PrESTs. As shown in
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay—ELISA is a standard method in biochemical research to determine absolute amounts, or at least to reproducibly determine protein levels. We therefore compared the SILAC-PrEST method to this established technology. When performing the ELISA assay for Stratifin (14-3-3 σ) under typical conditions—filtered cell lysate and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) as recommended by the manufacturer—the ELISA recorded less than 20% of the amount quantified by MS. (Note that there is no interference by 14-3-3 isoforms because these peptides are different.) The recommendation of the manufacturer was PBS could not solubilize the pellet. The solubility was increased by adding the nonionic detergent NP-40, which was able to dissolve most of the sample pellet. Adding a low concentration of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), an anionic detergent further improvement significantly increased measured protein amount (
We also investigated the levels of the transcription factor and proto-oncogene FOS by ELISA, the lowest abundance protein quantified in our mix. Here solubilization did not appear to be an issue and we received excellent agreement between quantitative values determined by MS and by ELISA using different buffer conditions (
Experimental procedure—The mouse PrESTs fused with a N-terminal His-tag were expressed in an auxotrophic E. coli strain using minimal media, supplemented with isotope labeled 13C6 15N2-Lysine (Lys8) and 13C615N4-Arginine (Arg10) (Cambridge Isotopes Laboratories) to obtain ‘heavy’ labeled proteins. The bacteria were harvested by centrifugation, lysed in 7M guanidinium chloride, 47 mM Na2HPO4, 2.65 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Tris HCL, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, pH 8.0 and the His-fusion PrESTs were enriched on a Cobalt Talon column (Clontech) and eluted in 6 M Urea, 50 mM NaH2PO4, 100 mM NaCl, 30 mM Acetic acid, 70 mM Na-acetate pH 5 (29).
Blood samples were drawn from mice into tubes containing heparin. The blood was centrifuged twice at 70 g and each time the supernatant, the platelet rich plasma (PRP), was retained. Apyrase and prostacyclin (PGI2) were added to the PRP to inhibit platelet aggregation. The sample was centrifuged and the pellet was washed twice with 1 ml of Tyrode's buffer (without Ca2+, containing BSA, apyrase and PGI2). Eventually the pellet was resuspended in 300-400 μl Tyrode's buffer and incubated for 30 min at 37° C. A standard hematologic analysis was performed using the Hemavet 950 (Drew Scientific Inc.) to count platelets.
The isolated platelets were lysed in 4% SDS, 100 mM Tris pH 8.5, 100 mM DTT, boiled for 5 min at 95° C. and the purified PrESTs were added to the lysate in the appropriate amount. The samples were prepared in accordance with the previously described FASP method (30). Peptides were collected by centrifugation and eluted with water. Peptides were desalted on C18 empore stages tips and eluted in buffer B (80% acetonitrile, 0.5% acetic acid), organic solvent was removed by speed-vacing and the sample was resolved in A* (2% acetonitrile, 0.5% acetic acid). The peptides were loaded without prefractionation on an in-house packed 20 cm column (75 μm inner diameter) packed with 1.8 μm C18 resin (Dr. Maisch GmbH) and separated using an EASY-nLC 1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on a 200 min 2-25% buffer B gradient. The separated peptides were sprayed via a nanoelectrospray ion source (Proxeon Biosystems) to a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The mass spectrometer acquired survey scans and the top 10 most abundant ions were sequentially fragmented with higher-energy collisional dissociation and MS/MS scans acquired. Raw data was analyzed using the Max Quant software as described in Example 1 except that the data was searched against the mouse IPI database version 3.68 containing 56,743 entries.
Results—To further broaden the approach to other species we designed PrESTs targeting mouse proteins. PrESTs were designed to span over a 125-200 amino acids region, yielding many tryptic peptides and including numerous peptides that were observed in the mass spectrometer in previous measurements. For each target protein we designed two PrESTs to cover different regions of the proteins and to ensure quantification precision. We designed PrESTs to measure the expression levels of Integrin beta 3 and its co-activators Talin 1 and Kindlin 3 in mouse platelets. The activation of the heterodimer Integrin αIIbβ3 (shifting from a low-affinity state to an high affinity state) plays an essential role in platelet adhesion and aggregation (31). Mice deficient of Kindlin 3 suffer from severe bleeding and die within several days. We determined expression levels of Integrin beta 3, Talin 1 and Kindlin 3 in wild-type mice (Kind3+/+), Kind3+/n, Kind3n/n and Kind3n/−. ‘n’ indicates an insertion of a neomycin cassette into an intron of the gene, affecting splicing of Kindlin 3. To further elucidate functionality of Integrin activation we wished to measure the stoichiometry of Integrin beta 3, Talin 1 and Kindlin 3 in the wildtype mice.
Integrin beta 3 and its co-activators are highly abundant proteins in platelets and Itgb3 has on average 300,000 copies per cell, while its co-activators Talin 1 has 470,000 copies and Kindlin 3 has on average 430,000 copies per platelet (Table 3,
Besides the copies per cell we also observed the decrease of the expression level of Kindlin 3 in the different knock-outs (
Using the absolute amount the stoichiometry of the three proteins (Table 2) in the wild-type mice was determined to be 1:1.5:1.3 and this stoichiometry information helps to further understand the binding of co-activators and the activation of integrins.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11002794 | Apr 2011 | EP | regional |
This application is a 35 U.S.C. §371 U.S. National Stage Entry of International Application No. PCT/EP2012/056234 filed Apr. 4, 2012, which claims the benefit of priority of European Application No.: 11002794.3 filed Apr. 4, 2011, U.S. Provisional Application No.: 61/471,528, filed Apr. 4, 2011 and U.S. Provisional Application No.: 61/471,534, filed Apr. 4, 2011, the contents of which are each incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2012/056234 | 4/4/2012 | WO | 00 | 11/18/2013 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2012/136737 | 10/11/2012 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040214272 | La Rosa et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20080081343 | Haynes et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 9614416 | May 1996 | WO |
| 03016861 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| 03102220 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| 2006128492 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| 2008154619 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Nanavati Dhaval et al. “Stoichiometry and absolute quantification of proteins with mass spectrometry using fluorescent and isotope-labeled concatenated peptide standards,” Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc., US, vol. 7, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2008. pp. 442-447. |
| Bigler Wang, et al. Binding of [beta] 4 [ gamma] 5 by Adenosine A 1 and A 2A Receptors Determined by Stable Isotope Labeling with Amino Acids in Cell Culture and Mass Spectrometry, Biochemistry, vol. 50, No. 2, Jan. 18, 2011, pp. 207-220. |
| Farmen SL et al. “Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of AP12-MALT1 Expression Signature by Isobaric Tags and High-Energy C-TRAP Dissociation Tandem Mass Spectrometry.” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 89, No. Suppl. 1, Jan. 2001, pp. 370A-371A. |
| Moon JY et al., “Expression and purification of a recombinant LL-37 from Escherichia coli”, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1758, 2006, pp. 1351-1358. |
| Gudmundsson G H et al., “The Human Gene Fall39 and Processing of the Catherin Precursor to the antibacterial peptide LL-37 in granulocytes”, European Journal of Biochemistry, Blackwell Publishing, Berlin, DE. vol. 238, No. 2, Jan. 1, 1996, pp. 325-332. |
| Database UniProt, “GST26—SCHJA”, http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P08515, Database accession No. P08515. |
| Halbhuber et al. “Overexpression and purification of recombinant membrane PsbH protein in Escherichia coli”, Protein Expression and Purification, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 18-27. |
| Li-Hsueh Chang et al. “The single cysteine residue on an alpha family chick liver glutathione S-transferase CL 3-3 is not functionally important”, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 180, No. 1, Oct. 1, 1991, pp. 323-328. |
| J. Rivers et al. “Absolute Multiplexed Quantitative Analysis of Protein Expression during Muscle Development Using QconCAT”, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, vol. 6, No. 8, Jan. 1, 2007, pp. 1416-9476. |
| International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/056234, dated Aug. 8, 2012. |
| Stys, et al. “Secondary structure estimation of recombinant psbH, encoding a photosynthetic membrane protein of Cyanobacterium synechocystis sp. PCC 6803”, Photosynthetica; International Journal of Photosynthesis Research, Kluwer Academic Publishes, DO, vol. 43, No. 3, Sep. 1, 2005, pp. 421-424. |
| Zeiler, Marlis, et al. “A Protein Epitope Signature Tag (PrEST) Library Allows SILAC-based Absolute Quantification and Multiplexed Determination of Protein Copy Numbers in Cell Lines.” The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc., 2012. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140072991 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61471528 | Apr 2011 | US | |
| 61471534 | Apr 2011 | US |
