This application is the U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2007/057465 filed Jul. 19, 2007 and claims the benefit thereof. The International Application claims the benefits of German application No. 10 2006 033 461.2 DE filed Jul. 19, 2006, both of the applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The invention relates to checking the radial gap present between the outer ends of the turbine blades and the housing on turbines.
Radar sensor technology is now very widespread in process automation and monitoring. Radar technology enables the speed, position and presence of a material reflecting microwaves to be measured directly.
In the power station field there is the requirement for optimum dimensioning of the radial gap on turbines. To this end it is necessary to monitor the radial gap. The definition of “radial gap” is expressed by the space between the outer end of turbine blades and the turbine housing. If this gap is large during the operation of the turbine, a part of the working gas, of which the energy should actually be taken up by the turbine blades, will flow as a secondary flow and thus as a loss flow through this gap and will reduce the efficiency of the turbine. With large turbines especially, such deteriorations in efficiency, even of only a few tenths of a percent, are clearly reflected in the fuel costs.
It is therefore of commercial and technological interest to be able to determine with great accuracy the radial gap of turbines during operation. In the past contact-based measurement processes were generally employed. Such measurement methods are nowadays already at a high level of development. At the same time however inherent disadvantages exist with these methods which should have been rectified in the interim. There is a natural interest in non-contact measurement methods in this area.
Of the known methods there are essentially three different systems to be mentioned which deal with determining the gas turbine radial gap during operation.
The oldest method uses a wear pin made of a soft material which is introduced into the turbine housing until it contacts individual turbine blades. This mechanical method has the disadvantage of high wear and inadequate measurement options. In this case only the blade projecting furthest outwards, i.e. the blade with the minimum radial gap is detected.
In a further development there is the above-mentioned system with electromechanical actuator. A disadvantage associated with said method lies in using a component subject to wear and the inherent necessity of using mechanical elements.
A fundamentally different measurement principle is based on a capacitive proximity sensor which eliminates a few of the disadvantages of the previously mentioned systems. With this method measurement errors occur which are also a function of the blade geometry. In addition the possible measurement accuracy is very limited.
An object of the invention is to provide a measurement method which is contactless if possible for measuring the radial gap on turbines which avoids disadvantages from the prior art. This object is achieved by the combination of the features in accordance with the independent claim. Advantageous embodiments can be taken from the dependent claims.
The invention initially uses a microwave-based measurement method for determining the radial gap. In addition a Doppler method is employed for evaluation. The instantaneous relative speed dependent on the radial gap, i.e. the speed between for example a blade end relative to the radar sensor, is evaluated in different phases of the passage of the turbine blade past the radar sensor which is in a stationary location in the turbine wall. The evaluation of the characteristic time-dependent value of the instantaneous speed is the important factor. This curve is recorded and evaluated many times over the course of time, with the corresponding radar sensor receiving the reflected radar microwaves emitted at scatter centers, for example the outermost end of a turbine blade, at the sensor and these subsequently being evaluated. Based on these speeds of the relative speeds evaluated at different moments it is possible to determine the position of an individual destination at a specific point in time.
In this case a distinction can advantageously be made between a number of destinations.
Exemplary embodiments which refer to the accompanying schematic figures and do not restrict the invention in any way are described below.
The present invention uses a microwave measurement, a Doppler method and combines the resulting information to establish the radial gap at a turbine. In such cases the momentary speed depending on the radial gap is evaluated in different phases of the passage of the turbine blade past the sensor fitted into the turbine wall.
It is important for the evaluation of characteristic time-dependent relative speeds to be recorded many times in the area around the passage of a turbine blade past the sensor. In this case the radar sensor sends microwaves and receives waves reflected at scatter centers. Because of relative speed curves it is possible to distinguish a number of destinations from each other The primary methodology however is the determination of the position of an individual destination at a specific point in time, for example the position of the outermost end of a turbine blade relative to the transmitter.
In relation to the details of the methodology for radial gap measurement it should be noted that, as the blade passes a sensor located a few millimeters from it in the wall of the turbine, the speed the blade or a blade tip relative to this sensor at the point of the greatest proximity becomes zero. This plausible phenomenon is now evaluated such that the precise curve of the speed is evaluated as a function of time. If the radial gap is very small or in the limit case equal to zero, the relative speed at the point of the greatest proximity of the turbine blade tip to the radar sensor will change very quickly and simultaneously suddenly change its leading sign. If the tip of the turbine blade or its outermost end passes at some distance from the sensor, the relative speed changes suddenly with a final slope at the zero crossing point or on the change of leading sign of the relative speed. The absolute value of the speed which is able to be determined via the Doppler displacement is then related to the incline of the relative speed in the zero crossing. The result is a measure of the minimum gap and thus of the radial gap.
It should be pointed out in general that an appropriate inventive radar sensor to be employed for the radial gap measurement emits a microwave signal which naturally “illuminates” a detection volume which as a rule is predetermined. Since the application described here by way of example represents a measurement in the near area from radar standpoints, a very wide radiating antenna will be needed to detect a sufficiently large section from the track of an outermost end of a turbine blade. Parts of the radar signal are reflected at one of these destinations and are accepted again by the sensor. In this case sensor and receiver signal are subsequently mixed with each other. The mixed signal encodes the relative phase shift between sent and received signal. This phase difference signal depends on the delay of the signal from the sensor to the destination and back again. If sensor and receiver signal are now in phase for example, a normal mixer delivers a comparatively large amplitude of the mixed signal. With phase-opposed signals the mixer delivers a relative minimum of the output amplitude. If the phase of the receiver signal is now continuously tuned, as can be achieved by a relative movement of the destination for example, maxima and minima alternate in time and a mixed signal is produced with periodic components, the frequency of which is proportional to the speed of the relative displacement between sensor and destination.
Advantages of the invention primarily involve the contactless measurement of the radial gap with high accuracy. In addition this technique allows further process variables to be accepted which are for example important for machine diagnostics. A significant advantage of the method of operation consists especially of the detection of destinations in the absolute near area, which cannot be undertaken with Doppler-based methods alone.
A significant advantage of a described method lies in the fact that, as well as the turbine blades with the smallest radial gap, turbine blades with a larger radial gap can be measured and are thus able to be detected at all.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 033 461 | Jul 2006 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/057465 | 7/19/2007 | WO | 00 | 1/13/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/009717 | 1/24/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3199103 | Augustine | Aug 1965 | A |
3544923 | Williams | Dec 1970 | A |
3551199 | Forster | Dec 1970 | A |
3553413 | Soulier | Jan 1971 | A |
4131889 | Gray | Dec 1978 | A |
4326804 | Mossey | Apr 1982 | A |
4384819 | Baker | May 1983 | A |
4384849 | Marchetti | May 1983 | A |
4413519 | Bannister et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4507658 | Keating | Mar 1985 | A |
4644270 | Oates et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4700127 | Sasaki et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
5479826 | Twerdochlib et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5818242 | Grzybowski et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6445995 | Mollmann | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6487491 | Karpman et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489917 | Geisheimer et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6584849 | Loftus et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6856281 | Billington et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7083384 | Bosselmann et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7095221 | Bosselmann et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7246991 | Bosche | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7373823 | Bosselmann et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7424823 | Teolis et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7455495 | Leogrande et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7483800 | Geisheimer et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486248 | Halek et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
20040057828 | Bosche | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050024284 | Halek et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050088171 | Gualtieri | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20080255799 | Pfeifer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090146897 | Halek et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100005870 | Bachmaier et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3044242 | Sep 1981 | DE |
101 19 669 | Oct 2002 | DE |
0118079 | Sep 1984 | EP |
1617174 | Jan 2006 | EP |
2 065 410 | Jun 1981 | GB |
2005014757 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2006005690 | Jan 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090289832 A1 | Nov 2009 | US |