The invention relates to a radiometric measuring device. By means of radiometric measuring devices, physical variables, e.g. a fill level or a density of a medium, are measurable.
Radiometric measuring devices are usually always applied, when conventional measuring devices can not be used at the measuring site, because of especially rough conditions. Very frequently, e.g. extremely high temperatures and pressures reign at the measuring site, or chemically and/or mechanically very aggressive, environmental influences are present, which make the use of other measuring methods impossible.
In radiometric measurement technology, a radioactive source, e.g. a Co 60 or a Cs 137 preparation, is placed in a radiation protection container and brought to a measuring location, e.g. to a container filled with a filling substance. Such a container can be e.g. a tank, a pipe, a conveyor belt or any other possible form of containment.
The radiation protection container has a window, through which the radiation emitted by the source positioned for the measurement is radiated out, through a wall of the radiation protection container.
Usually, a radiating direction is selected, such that the radiation passes through that region of the container which is to be registered for measurements. On the oppositely lying side, emerging radiation intensity changed by a fill level, or density, change is quantitatively registered with a detector. The emerging radiation intensity is dependent on the geometric arrangement and on the absorption. The latter is, in the case of fill level measurements, dependent on the amount of filling substance in the container, and, in the case of density measurements, on the density of the filling substance. As a result, the emerging radiation intensity is a measure for the current fill level, or the current density, of the filling substance in the container.
Suitable as detectors are e.g. a scintillation detector having a scintillator, e.g. a rod-shaped scintillation probe, and a photomultiplier. The scintillation probe is, in principle, a Plexiglas rod, which is optically very pure. Under the influence of gamma radiation, light flashes are emitted by the scintillation material. These are registered by the photomultiplier and converted into electrical pulses. A pulse rate, with which the pulses occur, depends on the radiation intensity and is, therefore, a measure for the physical variable to be measured, e.g. the fill level or the density. Scintillators and photomultipliers are usually assembled into a protective tube e.g. of a high grade steel, e.g. a high grade, stainless steel.
The detector includes, as a rule, an electronics, which makes available to a superordinated unit an output signal corresponding to the pulse rate. The electronics includes, usually, a control unit and a counter. The electrical pulses are counted and a count rate is derived, on the basis of which the physical variable to be measured is determinable.
Additionally, preferably a status of the detector is checked. The status involves, in the simplest case, an indication concerning whether the detector is working properly or not. Depending on the status, as required, a malfunction report and/or an alarm is triggered.
For transmitting the output signal and status of a detector, as a rule, two lines are provided between the detector and the superordinated unit.
An effective length of the detectors determines the measurable range of the container and depends on the required measurement height and the mounting opportunities. Detectors are obtainable, at this time, in lengths of about 400 mm to about 2000 mm. If a length of about 2000 mm is not sufficient, then two or more detectors can be connected to a radiometric measuring device.
A feature of conventional measuring devices is that each detector has its own electronics. For transmitting the output signals and status of each detector, at least two lines are run from each detector to the superordinated unit. The output signals of individual detectors are combined in the superordinated unit to a sum signal, which reflects the total rate of the registered pulses.
In the application of two or more detectors, the required technical effort rises in proportion to the number of detectors. For each detector, its own electronics is to be provided, with a counter and a control unit, the status of each detector must be separately checked, and each detector is to be connected with the superordinated unit by means of two lines. The superordinated unit must then check the status of each detector and combine the individual output signals to a measurement signal.
Each additional line increases the costs. Especially, when the detectors are placed in explosion-endangered areas, the costs for additional lines are considerable.
It is an object of the invention to provide a radiometric measuring device having two or more detectors, which can be installed and operated cost-favorably.
To this end, the invention involves a radiometric measuring device for mounting at a container fillable with a filling substance, including
Further, the invention involves a radiometric measuring device for mounting at a container fillable with a filling substance, including
According to an embodiment of the above-defined, radiometric measuring device, a series of detectors is provided, and the collector line begins at a first detector of the series, leads from there from one detector to the detector neighboring such, and from the last detector to the superordinated unit.
In a further embodiment, each detector comprises a scintillator and a photomultiplier appended thereto.
According to a further development of the last-mentioned, radiometric measuring device, the offset-generators send periodic reference light flashes through the scintillator via a light conductor.
In a further embodiment, the superordinated unit is integrated in the last detector of the series.
The invention further resides in a method for measuring a physical variable with one of the above-defined, radiometric measuring devices, wherein
According to an embodiment of the method, in the case of a negative difference, it is determined on the basis of the amount of the difference, which of the detectors is malfunctioning.
Further, the invention resides in a radiometric measuring device for mounting at a container fillable with a filling substance, comprising
Further, the invention resides in a radiometric measuring device for mounting at a container fillable with a filling substance, comprising
An advantage of the invention is that the detectors are only connected by a single line, the collector line, or the connecting line, as the case may be, via which both the status information and the measurement information are transmitted, because a single output signal is produced, which contains both pieces of information. This happens by superimposing a status-dependent offset on the pulse rate, or by superimposing on the pulse rate a detector-specific offset dependent on status, or this does not happen.
The invention and further advantages will now be explained in greater detail on the basis of the figures of the drawing, in which seven examples of embodiments are presented; equal parts are provided in the figures with equal reference characters. The figures show as follows:
To this end, the radiometric measuring device includes a radioactive source 5, which sends radioactive radiation through the container 3 during operation. Source 5 includes e.g. a radiation protection container, in which is housed a radioactive preparation, e.g. a Co 60 or Cs 137 preparation. The radiation protection container has a window, through which the radiation emerges at a spreading angle α and passes through the container 3.
The measuring device further includes at least one detector D, which serves for registering the radiation passing through the container 3 and for producing an electric pulse rate N corresponding to the registered radiation. Depending on application, a plurality of detectors Di can be connected one after the other, in order to cover a sufficiently large range, in which radiation can be registered. In the example of an embodiment shown in
Each detector Di includes an electronics 13, which registers electrical pulses n produced by the photomultiplier 9 and produces a pulse rate N corresponding to the registered radiation.
The electronics 13 includes, preferably, a counter 15 and a microcontroller 17 connected thereto. The counter 15 counts the incoming electric pulses n and the microcontroller 17 determines, on the basis of the counted pulses n, a pulse rate N.
According to a first form of embodiment, each detector Di has, additionally, an offset-generator 19, which produces an offset Oi corresponding to a status of the particular detector Di. The offset generators 19 are, preferably, and as shown in
The output signal is generated in the microcontroller 17 and is available via an output stage 20 of the microcontroller 17.
A collector line 21 is provided, to which each detector Di feeds its output signal corresponding to the superimposing of its pulse rate Ni and its offset Oi.
The collector line 21 leads from one detector Di to the next, neighboring detector Di+1.
In the collector line 21, the output signals of the individual detectors Di superimpose to form a sum signal S, which corresponds to the sum of the individual output signals.
The superordinated unit 23 derives, on the basis of the sum signal S, a measurement signal M and/or a status signal of the measuring device. To accomplish this, various methods can be used.
A first method will now be explained in greater detail on the basis of the example of an embodiment shown in
Osi>ΣiNimax
If the maximum expected pulse rate Nimax of each detector Di is, for example, smaller than 20 pulses n per interval of time, then the desired values Osi in the example of
In the simplest case, the offset generators 19 of the detectors Di are made to produce a offset Oi which corresponds to the desired value Osi, when the particular detector Di is working properly, and no offset, i.e. an offset of 0 pulses K per interval of time, when the detector Di is not working properly.
The superordinated unit 23 contains a counter 25 and an evaluating unit 27 connected thereto. The counter 25 counts the incoming pulses ni, Ki. On the basis of the sum signal, a total count rate G is determined. The total count rate G is equal to the sum of the individual pulse rates Ni of the individual detectors Di and the individual offsets Oi.
The following holds:
G=Σi(Ni+Oi)
In a next step, the evaluating unit 27 of the superordinated unit 23 forms a difference between this total count rate G and a count rate corresponding to the sum of the desired values Osi of the offsets Oi. For this purpose, there is connected to the evaluating unit 27 a memory 28, in which the desired values Osi of the offsets Oi are stored.
The following holds:
D=G−ΣiOsi
When all detectors are working properly, this difference is positive and equal to the sum of the pulse rates Ni of the individual detectors Di.
If at least one detector Di is not working properly, the difference D is negative. A negative difference D means that an error is present. At least one of the detectors is not working properly.
The evaluating unit 27 determines, whether the difference D is positive or negative. It recognizes that an error is present, when the difference D is negative.
Additionally, it is possible, in the case of the presence of a negative difference D, i.e. an error, on the basis of the magnitude, or absolute value, |D| of the difference D, to determine, which of the detectors Di is malfunctioning. This makes a search for the error easier, following recognition of the error, as well as facilitating the eliminating of the error.
For this, for instance in the example of an embodiment presented with respect to
Osi≠Osj, when i≠j;
|Osi−Osj|>ΣiNimax
Osi>ΣiNimax.
If, as given above in terms of an example, Nimax<20, then, for example, the desired values can be selected as follows: Os1=100, Os2=200 and Os3=300.
If a single detector Di is not operating properly, then the following holds for the magnitude |D| of the difference D:
|D|=|ΣiNi−Osi| and, thus,
Osi=ΣiNimax<|D|<Osi.
If detector D1 is not working properly, then the magnitude |D| of the difference D lies, as a result, between 40 and 100. If detector D2 is not working properly, then the magnitude |D| of the difference D lies, as a result, between 140 and 200. If detector D3 is not working properly, then the magnitude |D| of the difference D lies, as a result, between 240 and 300.
Thus, on the basis of the magnitude |D| of the difference D, it is possible, unequivocally, to determine which Di is not working properly. The assigning of the magnitude |D| of the difference D to the affected detector Di assumes, however, that only a single detector Di is not working properly.
If one would want also to determine in the case of two detectors Di and Dj not working properly, which detectors Di, Dj these are, then the following must additionally hold for the desired values Osi, Osj of the offsets Oi, Oj of every possible affected detector pair Di, Dj:
Osi+Osj∉[Osk−ΣiNimax; Osk+ΣiNimax]
For instance, in the case of the above example, the desired values for the first, second and third detectors D1, D2, D3 can be, for example, Os1=100, Os2=500 and Os3=1000, respectively.
If only one detector Di is not working properly, then the following holds for the magnitude |D| of the difference D:
|D|=|ΣiNi−Osi|, and, thus,
OsiΣiNimax<|D|<Osi.
If detector D1 is not working properly, then the magnitude |D| of the difference D lies between 40 and 100. If detector D2 is not working properly, then the magnitude |D| of the difference D lies between 440 and 500. If detector D3 is not working properly, then the magnitude |D| of the difference D lies between 940 and 1000.
If the detectors Di and Dj are not working properly, then the following holds for the magnitude |D| of the difference D:
|D|=|ΣiNi−Osj−Osi|, and, thus,
Osi+Osj−ΣiNimax<|D|<Osj+Osi.
If the detectors D1 and D2 are not working properly, then the magnitude |D| of the difference D lies between 540 and 600. If the detectors D1 and D3 are not working properly, then the magnitude |D| of the difference D lies between 1040 and 1100. If the detectors D2 and D3 are not working properly, then the magnitude |D| of the difference D lies between 1440 and 1500.
If none of the detectors D1, D2 and D3 is working properly, then the magnitude |D| of the difference D lies between 1540 and 1600. Thus, in the defined example of an embodiment, also this last case can be recognized on the basis of the magnitude |D| of the difference D.
If more than three detectors are employed, then the method can be correspondingly expanded.
The superordinated unit 23 recognizes, on the basis of the difference D, the presence of an error and derives therefrom the status of the measuring device. In the simplest case, the status contains the information that all detectors Di are working properly, or at least one of these is not. Additionally, the status can, in the case of an error, contain the information as to which of the one or more detectors Di is not working properly.
In the presence of an error, the superordinated unit 23 produces an output signal reflecting the status, which is fed, for example, to a measuring device electronics 29, or to a process control location. The superordinated unit can also issue an error report and/or trigger an alarm.
If no error is present, then the difference D is positive. The superordinated unit recognizes this and produces a measurement signal M on the basis of the sum signal. In the simplest case, the measurement signal corresponds to the difference D. When all detectors are working properly, this difference is positive and equal to the sum of the individual pulse rates Ni of the individual detectors Di:
D=G−ΣiOsi=ΣiNi
On the basis of this measurement signal, the physical variable to be measured, e.g. a fill level or a density of the filling substance, is determined. This can occur in conventional manner either by means of a measuring device electronics 29 integrated in the superordinated unit 23 or in a remotely located, evaluating unit 31.
If all detectors Di are working properly, the superordinated unit 23 can likewise issue an output signal reflecting the status. In this way, also the error-free working of the detectors Di can be indicated to, for example, the measuring device electronics 29, the evaluating unit 31 or to some other location, e.g. a process control location.
The superordinated unit 23 can be located in the last detector of a series; it can, however, also be arranged separately. The same holds for the measuring device electronics 29.
An advantage of the invention is that, due to the superimposing of the pulse rates Ni and the offsets Oi, and their transport together in the collector line 21, only a single connecting line, namely the collector line 21, is required for transmitting both the actual measurement information and also the status information. This reduces the required wiring effort considerably. Especially in safety-relevant regions, in which radiometric measuring devices are usually applied, e.g. in regions with increased danger of explosion, there are high safety demands placed on connecting lines, with which, as a rule, are associated increased procurement and installation costs. These costs are markedly reduced by the radiometric measuring devices of the invention. The collector line 21 can be a very simple connection, e.g. a light wave conductor, e.g. an optical fiber, or a copper line. Likewise, it is possible to replace the collector line 21 with a radio connection.
The transmission can be done in very simple manner. Especially, no transmission protocol is needed. The transmission of the output signals of the individual detectors Di can, in fact, with appropriate calibration, be accomplished via any kind of pulse output directed to a corresponding pulse input of the superordinated unit 23.
Also here, detectors Di are provided, which serve for registering radiation passing through the container 3 and for producing an electrical pulse rate Ni corresponding to the registered radiation. Each detector Di includes an offset generator 19, which superimposes on the pulse rate Ni of the pertinent detector Di a detector-specific offset Odi. In contrast to the above example of an embodiment, here the offsets Odi are detector-specific and independent of the status of the pertinent detector Di.
Each detector Di includes a turn-off switch 33, which serves for suppressing transmission of the pulse rate Ni and the offset Odi, when the detector Di is malfunctioning. Turn-off switch 33 is, for example, a simple switch, which interrupts the connection of the pertinent detector Di to the collector line 21. Turn-off 33 switch can, however, also be integrated in the output stage 20 of the microcontroller 17.
During operation, therefore, only every properly working detector Di feeds an output signal, corresponding to the superimposing of the pertinent pulse rate Ni and the pertinent offset Odi, to the collector line 21. Non-properly working detectors Di, in contrast, issue no output signal.
The collector line 21 feeds, as also the case in the above-described example of an embodiment, a sum signal, corresponding to the superimposing of the output signals, to the superordinated unit 23. This derives, as already described in connection with the above example of an embodiment, a measurement signal and/or a status of the measuring device on the basis of the sum signal.
With appropriate choice of the detector-specific offsets Odi, it is possible here, exactly as in the case of the example of an embodiment described above, to recognize, which of one or more detectors is not working properly. Additionally, a remainder count rate R can be determined, which is equal to the sum of the count rates Ni of the properly-working detectors Di.
Such is equal to the difference between the total count rate G and the sum of the offsets Odi of the properly working detectors Di. If, for example, the detector Dx is not working properly, then the following holds:
R=G−Σi,i≠xOdi
From this, as required, helpful additional information can be derived. As an example, only a fill level measurement with two detectors is treated, such as is illustrated in
Alternatively to the form of embodiment presented in
The first detector D1 has an offset generator, which superimposes on the pulse rate N1 of the first detector D1 an offset O1 reflecting the status of the first detector D1.
This is accomplished, for example, exactly as in the case of the example of an embodiment described with respect to
Also here, a superordinated unit 23 is provided, integrated in the second detector D2. The first detector D1 is connected via a connecting line 37 with the superordinated unit 23, via which the first detector D1 feeds an output signal corresponding to the superimposing of the pulse rate N1 and the offset O1. The connecting line 37 is connected for this purpose to a first input 39 of the superordinated unit 23.
Additionally fed to the superordinated unit 23 are the pulse rate N2 and the status of the second detector D2.
To this end, the second detector D2 can be equipped, exactly as in the case of the first detector D1, with an offset generator 19, which superimposes on the pulse rate N2 an offset O2 reflecting the status of the second detector D2. An output signal corresponding to this superimposing lies then on a second input 41 of the superordinated unit 23.
Alternatively, the superordinated unit 23 can register the status information directly via a third input 43. The second detector then, in the case of this variant of embodiment, does not have an offset generator 19. Thus,
The superordinated unit derives, on the basis of the incoming signals, a measurement signal and/or a status of the measuring device.
This happens, analogously to the examples of embodiments described above, by assigning to the offsets O1 and, as required, O2, desired values Os1, Os2, which the respective offset O1, O2 assumes, when the associated detector D1, D2 is working properly. If a detector D1, D2 is not working properly, then, for example, no offset is superimposed.
Since the superordinated unit 23 is integrated in the second detector D2, the information of the detectors D1 and D2 can be processed separately via the inputs 37, 39, and, as required, 41, without other lines running outside of the detectors being required in addition to the connecting line 37.
This offers the advantage that the desired values Os1 and, as required, Os2 must only be greater than the maximum pulse rate Nimax expected for the pertinent detectors D1, D2, but, by all means, can be smaller than the sum of the maximum expected pulse rate N1max+N2max. This improves the accuracy of measurement.
On the basis of the output signal of the first detector D1, the superordinated unit 23 determines a count rate Z1, which is equal to the sum of the pulse rate N1 and the offset O1. Then, the difference between this count rate Z1 and the desired value Os1 for the offset O1 of the first detector is formed. If the difference is positive, then detector D1 is working properly and the magnitude of the difference is equal to the pulse rate N1 of the first detector D1. If the difference is negative, then the superordinated unit 23 recognizes that detector D1 is not working properly.
In the case of the variant of the embodiment, in which the second detector D2 is likewise equipped with an offset generator 19, the second detector D2 is used in an analogous manner, i.e. the superordinated unit 23 determines, on the basis of the output signal of the second detector D2, a count rate Z2, which equals the sum of the pulse rate N2 and the offset O2. Then, the difference between this count rate Z2 and the desired value Os2 for the offset O2 of the second detector D2 is formed. If the difference is positive, then detector D2 is working properly and the magnitude of the difference is equal to the pulse rate N2 of the second detector D2. If the difference is negative, then the superordinated unit 23 recognizes that the detector D2 is not working properly.
In the case of the alternative variant of the embodiment, in which the status information is separately transmitted, the superordinated unit recognizes directly on the basis of the signal lying on the third input 43, whether the second detector D2 is working properly. Further, it determines, on the basis of the output signal of the second detector D2 incoming on the second input 41, a count rate Z2, which equals the pulse rate N2 of the second detector D2.
In the case of both variants, the status of the first and second detectors then is present in the superordinated unit 23.
If both detectors D1, D2 are working properly, then the pulse rates N1 and N2 are present in the superordinated unit 23. Simple addition of the pulse rates N1 and N2 leads to a measurement signal, which corresponds to the radiation registered by the two detectors D1 and D2. Additionally, the measurement information of each individual detector D1, D2 is available on the basis of the individual pulse rates N1, N2. If only one of the detectors D1 or D2 is working properly, this additional information can be separately used, as already explained above.
In the case of the example of an embodiment presented in
The first detector D1 is connected via the connecting line 37 to the first input 39 of the superordinated unit 23 integrated in the second detector D2, while the second detector D2 is directly connected to its second input 41. In contrast to the example of an embodiment illustrated in
Instead, in each detector D1, D2, a turn-off switch 45 is provided, which suppresses the transmission to the superordinated unit of an output signal corresponding to the pulse rate N1, N2 of the pertinent detector D1, D2, when such detector D1, D2 is malfunctioning.
The signals of the detectors D1 and D2 fed to the superordinated unit 23 thus correspond to the pulse rates N1, N2 of the detectors D1, D2, when such are working properly.
The superordinated unit 23 has, preferably, a first counter, which counts the pluses n1 incoming at the first input 39 and a second counter, which counts the pulses n2 incoming at the second input 41, and determines the count rates Z1, Z2 of the incoming pulses n1, n2. If a count rate Z1, Z2 is zero pulses per time interval, then the superordinated unit 23 recognizes that the associated detector D1, D2 is not working properly. From this, the status of the measuring device is derived, and a corresponding status information is made available. The status information contains the statement that both detectors D1 and D2 are working properly, when both count rates Z1 and Z2 are different from zero. For the case that one or both count rates Z1, Z2 equal(s) zero, it contains the information that the measuring device is not working properly. Additionally, the status information can contain data concerning which of the detectors D1, D2 is not working properly, or whether both of the detectors D1, D2 are not working properly.
The status information is provided via an output 47 of the superordinated unit 23. Output 47 is preferably the only output of the second detector, as well as the only output of the measuring device. On the basis of the status information, an alarm can, for example, be triggered.
If both count rates Z1 and Z2 are different from zero, then both detectors D1 and D2 are working properly, and the superordinated unit 23 derives a measurement signal. This is based on the sum of the count rates, Z1+Z2, which, in this case, is equal to the sum of the pulse rates N1+N2 of the detectors D1 and D2. The measurement signal can, in such case, be a signal, which reflects the sum of the pulse rates N1+N2. The measurement signal is then, for example, fed to a measuring device electronics 29 or to a separate evaluating unit 31, which determines, on the basis of the measurement signal, the variable to be measured with the measuring device, e.g. a fill level or a density. The measuring device electronics 29 is, for example, likewise arranged in the second detector D2.
Alternatively, an evaluation and/or processing of the pulse rates N1+N2 can also occur in the superordinated unit 23.
Status and/or measurement signal is/are available via the output 47.
In the case of all measuring devices of the invention, a single collector line, or a single connecting line, suffices for transmitting both the status and also the actual measurement information.
Each detector Di can, naturally, only transmit its status to the superordinated unit 23, when the status has already earlier been determined. In the technology of measurements, a series of methods for control and/or monitoring of the proper functioning of detectors are known.
An example, in this connection, is the control and/or monitoring of the energy, or power, supply of the detectors or individual detector components.
Further, it is possible, in the case of the described detectors Di, to check the optical coupling between the scintillator 7 and the photomultiplier 11.
To this end, e.g. reference light flashes are sent continuously through the scintillator 7 via the light conductor 49. Independently of whether the scintillator 7 is subjected to gamma radiation, or not, reference pulses must, due to the reference light flashes, be present on the output of the photomultiplier 11. If this is not the case, then the pertinent detector Di is not working properly.
In the case of measuring devices of the invention, in which the detectors Di include offset-generators 19, which superimpose on the pulse rate Ni an offset Oi dependent on the status of the pertinent detector Di, the status determination occurs, preferably, in the manner illustrated in
Preferably, the frequency fi, with which the reference light flashes are emitted, equals the initially described, desired value Osi for the offset Oi of the pertinent detector Di. If the detector Di is working properly, then, on the output, there is a signal which corresponds to the sum of the pulse rate Ni and the desired value Osi. If a disturbance is present, markedly fewer pulses are detected. If the pulse rate of the detected pulses falls beneath the desired value Osi, then this leads to a negative difference D.
An advantage of the invention is that, in the case of all radiometric measuring devices of the invention, only a single connection, namely the connector line 21, or the connecting line 37, as the case may be, is needed, in order to transmit both the actual measurement information as well as also the status information. This reduces the required wiring effort considerably. Especially in safety-relevant areas, in which radiometric measuring devices are usually applied, e.g. in areas with increased danger of explosion, there are high safety demands on connecting lines, with which are associated, as a rule, increased procurement and installation costs. These costs are markedly reduced by the radiometric measuring devices of the invention. This can be a very simple connection, e.g. a light wave conductor or a copper line. Likewise is it possible to embody the connection as a radio connection.
The transmission can be done in very simple manner. Especially, no transmission protocol is needed. The transmission of the output signals of the individual detectors Di can, in fact, occur, in the case of appropriate calibration, via every kind of pulse output to a corresponding pulse input of the superordinated unit 23.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 007 680.4 | Feb 2004 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP05/50639 | 2/14/2005 | WO | 6/27/2007 |