The present invention relates to managing memory page tables in a processing system, and more specifically, to radix table translation of memory regions in a processing system.
Several address translation mechanisms are used in computer systems. In PowerPC® by IBM, for example, an effective address is translated to a corresponding real address by way of page table entries found by selecting an ESID table entries associated with the effective address, and using the entry to locate a group of page table entry by way of a hashing algorithm. In zArchitecture®, also by IBM, for another example, an effective address is translated to a corresponding real address by way of a hierarchy of translation tables, translation tables are indexed by a portion of the effective address to find the address of the next translation table of the hierarchy until a real (or absolute) address is obtained. Thus, the PowerPC address translation maps a 64 bit effective address (of a large range of memory (264 bytes)) in only 2 levels (an SLB table entry and page table entry), while zArchitecture hierarchical address translation requires 5 tables to translate a large effective address range (264 bytes). Both address translation mechanisms provide advantages to respective operating systems.
EP690386A1 Jan. 3, 1996 “Address translator and method of operation”, incorporated herein by reference teaches a CAM/SRAM structure (44) performs address translations that are compatible with a segmentation/paging addressing scheme yet require only a single look-up step. Each entry in the effective-to-real-address-translator has two CAM fields (ESID, EPI) that independently compare an input segment identifier and an input page identifier to a stored segment identifier and a stored page identifier, respectively. The ERAT outputs a stored real address field (DATA) associated with a stored segment-stored page pair if both comparisons are equivalent. The ERAT can invalidate stored translations on the basis of segment or page granularity by requiring either a segment or a page CAM field match, respectively, during an invalidate operation.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,103,851B2 Jan. 24, 2012 “Dynamic address translation with translation table entry format control for identifying format of the translation table entry” incorporated herein by reference teaches an enhanced dynamic address translation facility. In one embodiment, a virtual address to be translated and an initial origin address of a translation table of the hierarchy of translation tables are obtained. An index portion of the virtual address is used to reference an entry in the translation table. If a format control field contained in the translation table entry is enabled, the table entry contains a frame address of a large block of data of at least 1M byte in size. The frame address is then combined with an offset portion of the virtual address to form the translated address of a small 4K byte block of data in main storage or memory.
Embodiments include a system and computer program product for receiving a request to access a desired block of memory. The request includes an effective address that includes an effective segment identifier (ESID) and a linear address. The linear address includes a most significant portion and a byte index. An entry in a buffer that includes the ESID of the effective address is located. Based on the entry including a radix page table pointer (RPTP), the RPTP is used to locate a translation table of a hierarchy of translation tables. The located translation table is used to translate the most significant portion of the linear address to obtain an address of a block of memory. Based on the obtained address, the requested access is performed to the desired block of memory.
Additional features and advantages are realized through the techniques of the present invention. Other embodiments and aspects of the invention are described in detail herein and are considered a part of the claimed invention. For a better understanding of the invention with the advantages and the features, refer to the description and to the drawings.
The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The forgoing and other features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Processors including central processing units (CPUs) may use segment lookaside buffers (SLB) as caches that improve virtual address translation speed. Previous systems have used a single radix page table pointer (RPTP) to access pages using a linear address. Such systems manage a single large region that may have a large gap in memory space. The embodiments described below offer a method, system, and computer readable medium that provides for the use of any number of RPTPs to translate any number of multiple discontiguous virtual memory regions.
When a PTE 152 is found in the group that corresponds to the hashed value, the address of the physical memory page in the PTE is used to access physical memory. In order to improve performance, once a PTE entry is found, the EA 104 portion and address of the physical memory page found in the PTE are stored in the TLB 154, such that further accesses to the same EA page will “hit” in the TLB 154 and avoid the PTE search. The page table is located by a page table origin address provided by the processor.
The IBM zArchitecture Principles of Operation SA22-7832-8 and Intel Itanium Archictectrure Software Developer's Manual Volume 2: System Architecture, Document Number: 245318-005 each incorporated by reference herein include descriptions of other address translation schemes using a hierarchy of translation tables.
In order to support the smaller tables used for regions A and B of virtual memory, the effective address must be effectively truncated for each region to only include address bits used in a subset of the translation tables. For example, bits for indexing into Table 1, will be zeroed if Table 1 is not to be used.
When an SLB entry is found, the RPTP portion is used to find the origin address of the first translation table, of the hierarchy of translation tables to be used. The size field 602 is used to generate a segment size mask. The segment size mask truncates high order bits of the effective address (EA) that will not be needed for indexing into translation tables. The segment size mask is used to direct the portion of the EA that will be used to index into a block of real address of memory, wherein the address of the block is provided by the translation tables. Thus, only a minimal number of translation tables are needed for each RPTP.
Turning now to
The RPTP 801 and the linear address 807 are used, for example, to access a memory location using, for example, a hierarchy of address translation tables (a radix table (i.e., radix tree)), such as the radix table 711 of
In some exemplary embodiments fields such as process ID, thread ID, processor ID, and partition ID, are compared with those corresponding values stored in the SLBEs. These IDs are independent of effective address 802 and establish a context for effective address 802. In that way, instead of being tasked to flush the SLB when a processor switches to a different process (e.g., both processes could be using the same address 2000 in different ways), both processes may co-exist in the same SLB. For thread/processor/partition IDs, they broaden the context beyond a running program such that they specify actual or virtualized hardware.
In another embodiment of the method described above in
In this regard, an appropriate number of zeros are appended to the RPTP 801 to construct a global directory pointer. The number of zeros appended corresponds to the size of the global directory 906. For this example, the global directory 906 is 512 entries with 8 bytes per entry resulting in a total size of 4096 bytes. Thus, twelve zeros (log2 4096) in this example are appended to the RPTP 801 value. (All tables/directories have 8 bytes per entry corresponding to a 64-bit example.) The 36-bit page 808 is subdivided into four sets of 9 bits each to navigate through the global directory 906, upper directory 908, middle directory 910, and page table 912. For this example, the RPTP 801 will be 0x0000000000100000 and the linear address 807 will be 0x1234567890AB. Starting at the global directory 906, the 9 most significant bits of the linear address 807 (the value 36) are extracted and used as a 0 . . . 511 index into the global directory 906 and the entry at memory location 0x0000000000100000+36*8 is read. The value read is treated as a pointer to the upper directory 908. (For this example, 0x0000000000200000 is returned.) The next nine most significant bits of linear address 807 (the value 209) are extracted and used as a 0 . . . 511 index into the upper directory 908 and the entry at memory location 0x0000000000200000+209*8 is read. The value read is treated as a pointer to the middle directory 410. (For this example, 0x0000000000300000 is returned.) The next nine most significant bits of linear address 807 (the value 179) are extracted and used as a 0 . . . 511 index into the middle directory 910 and the entry at memory location 0x0000000000300000+179*8 is read. The value read is treated as a pointer to the page table 912. (For this example, 0x0000000000400000 is returned.) The remaining, least significant nine bits (the value 393) of linear address 807 are extracted and used as a 0 . . . 511 index into the page table 912 and the entry at memory location 0x0000000000400000+393*8 is read. The value read is treated as a pointer to the page 904. (For this example, 0x0000000000500000 is returned.) The 12 bits of byte 810 of the linear address 807 (the value 171) are added to the value of page 904 (0x0000000000500000) resulting in the fully translated address: 0x00000000005000AB.
Though the illustrated embodiments describe a system using 64-bit effective addresses 804, any other effective addresses of any alternative size may be used.
As described above, embodiments can be embodied in the form of computer-implemented processes and apparatuses for practicing those processes. An embodiment may include a computer program product 1200 as depicted in
The technical effects and benefits of the methods and systems described above allow any number of RPTPs to translate any number of multiple discontiguous memory regions to access data in memory locations.
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, aspects of the present invention may be embodied as a system, method or computer program product. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.” Furthermore, aspects of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.
Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may be utilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this document, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
Aspects of the present invention are described below with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one more other features, integers, steps, operations, element components, and/or groups thereof.
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
The flow diagrams depicted herein are just one example. There may be many variations to this diagram or the steps (or operations) described therein without departing from the spirit of the invention. For instance, the steps may be performed in a differing order or steps may be added, deleted or modified. All of these variations are considered a part of the claimed invention.
While the preferred embodiment to the invention had been described, it will be understood that those skilled in the art, both now and in the future, may make various improvements and enhancements which fall within the scope of the claims which follow. These claims should be construed to maintain the proper protection for the invention first described.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3781808 | Ahearn et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
4914577 | Stewart et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4992936 | Katada et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5125086 | Perazzoli, Jr. | Jun 1992 | A |
5222222 | Mehring et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5247634 | Cline et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5282274 | Liu | Jan 1994 | A |
5375214 | Mirza et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5426750 | Becker et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5454091 | Sites et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5465337 | Kong | Nov 1995 | A |
5479627 | Khalidi et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5526504 | Hsu et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5586283 | Lopez-Aguado et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5617554 | Alpert et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5765209 | Yetter | Jun 1998 | A |
5774135 | Letham | Jun 1998 | A |
5790979 | Liedtke | Aug 1998 | A |
5802605 | Alpert et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5907867 | Shinbo et al. | May 1999 | A |
5930830 | Mendelson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5946679 | Ahuja et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956756 | Khalidi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963984 | Garibay et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6185570 | Ladwig et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6275912 | Haba | Aug 2001 | B1 |
7149872 | Rozas et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7296139 | Case et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7366869 | Sartorius et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7389395 | Garthwaite et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7412466 | Garthwaite | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7447869 | Kruger et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7533228 | Garthwaite | May 2009 | B1 |
7562205 | Case et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7779214 | Stecher | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7809921 | Davis | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7917725 | Stecher | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7975114 | Tene et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8037278 | Greiner et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8103851 | Greiner et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20010025336 | Hirai et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20040215918 | Jacobs et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050050295 | Noel et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050108496 | Elnozahy et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060069899 | Schoinas et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060149913 | Rothman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060149919 | Arizpe et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060212675 | Sartorius et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060253682 | Armstrong et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070079106 | Davis | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070294499 | Garthwaite | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080052486 | Davis | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080104086 | Bare et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104358 | Noel et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090019253 | Stecher et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090049320 | Dawkins et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090182964 | Greiner et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182972 | Greiner et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100011187 | Schoinas et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100058026 | Heil et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100125708 | Hall et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110004739 | Hohmuth et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110125983 | Stecher | May 2011 | A1 |
20110225389 | Grisenthwaite | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238946 | Rajamony et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110276778 | Dooley et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110283040 | Chadha et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0690386 | Jan 1996 | EP |
2002132581 | May 2002 | JP |
2006106428 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2013186645 | Dec 2013 | WO |
WO 2013186645 | Dec 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Barr, Exploiting Address Space Contiguity to Accelerate TLB Miss Handling, Apr. 2010, Rice University, Entire Document. |
Huck, Architectural support for translation table management in large address space machines, May 1993, ISCA '93 Proceedings of the 20th annual international symposium on computer architecture, pp. 39-50. |
Liedtke, Address Space Sparsity and Fine Granularity, ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, Jan. 1995, vol. 29 Issue 1, pp. 87-90. |
Peng, The PowerPC Architecture[TM]: 64-Bit Power with 32-Bit Compatibility, 1995, Compcon—IEEE—Digest of Papers and Proceedings, pp. 300-308. |
Szmajda, Variable Radix Page Table: A Page Table for Modern Architectures, 2003, Advances in Computer Systems Architecture Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 2823, pp. 290-304. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13,517,738; Non Final Office Action; filed Jun. 14, 2012; Date Mailed: Jan. 16, 2014; pp. 1-31. |
UK International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/IB2013/054166, International Filing Date: May 21, 2013; Date of mailing: Aug. 27, 2013, 6 pages. |
UK International Search Report and Written Opinion for Internation Application No. PCT/IB2013/054806; International Filing Date: Jun. 12, 2013; Date of Mailing: Sep. 17, 2013, 9 pages. |
IBM, “Power ISA (Trademark) Version 2.06 Revision B,” Jul. 23, 2010, Softcopy Distribution: http://www.power.org/resources/reading/, pp. 1-1341. |
IBM, “zArchitecture—Principles of Operation,” SA22-7832-8, Aug. 2010, pp. 1-1496, http://www.ibm.com/support/documentation. |
Intel, “Intel (registered) Itanium (registered) Architecture Software Developer's Manual,” vol. 2: System, Architecture, Document No. 245318-005, Revision 2.2, Jan. 2006, pp. 1-654. |
Intel, “Intel (registered) Itanium (registered) Architecture Software Developer's Manual,” Revision 2.3, vol. 1: Application Architecture, May 2010, 244 pages, Document No. 245317. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13,517,763; Non Final Office Action; filed Jun. 14, 2012; Date Mailed: Jan. 22, 2014; pp. 1-32. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13,785,212; Non Final Office Action; filed Mar. 5, 2013; Date Mailed: Feb. 5, 2014; pp. 1-31. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13,785,188; Non Final Office Action; filed Mar. 5, 2013; Date Mailed: Feb. 6, 2014; pp. 1-29. |
T. W. Barr et al., “Translation Caching: Skip, Don't Walk (the Page Table),” ISCA '10, Jun. 19-23, 2010, Saint Malo, France, Copyright 2010 ACM, Jul. 10, 2006, 12 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130339652 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |