The invention relates to a rail vehicle having tilting technology.
When a rail vehicle travels through a curve, the centrifugal force produces a moment whereby the car tilts in the direction of the outside of the curve. As a result of said tilt, the system of coordinates also rotates for the passenger in the car body, and part of the gravitational acceleration now works as lateral acceleration, this being a particularly unpleasant sensation.
In particular, in the case of high-speed travel through a curve with high transversal acceleration at the wheelset, the values acceptable to the passenger are significantly exceeded in the absence of additional measures.
The prior art discloses so-called tilting technology, a curve-dependent car body control system, in which the car bodies of a railway train can be tilted towards the inside of the curve, thereby reducing the lateral acceleration that is experienced.
It is therefore possible to travel faster through curves (“high-speed travel through a curve”) or to make the travel through a curve more pleasant for the passenger (“comfort tilting”).
Tilting technology systems disclosed in the prior art, e.g. as described in EP 0619212, allow a curve tilt of up to 8°. This allows the speed in curves to be increased by up to 30% without any reduction in travelling comfort through increased lateral acceleration.
Tilting technology systems can essentially be embodied as passive systems or active systems.
In the case of passive tilting technology, the car bodies are usually suspended above their center of gravity on raised extensions of the chassis frame. They therefore swing outwards in the lower region and inwards in the upper region as a result of the centrifugal force. The swinging is cushioned by damping elements. The angle of tilt is restricted to 3.5°. This means that the increase in speed when travelling through curves is also significantly less than in the case of active systems, and passive tilting technology is therefore used primarily to improve comfort.
In the case of active tilting technology, the displacement of the car bodies is effected by means of actuators, which are embodied as hydraulic actuating cylinders or as electrical servomechanisms. In this case, it must be ensured that the car bodies are automatically returned from a tilted state to a horizontal basic state (ready-to-run position) if the actuators fail. This is achieved by designing the chassis in relation to the center of gravity and the rotational axis of the car bodies such that a corresponding righting moment becomes effective in the tilted state. It is disadvantageous in this case that powerful actuators are required for this purpose, since said actuators must act against this righting moment in the tilted state of the car bodies.
DE 103 16 497 discloses a rail vehicle having active tilting technology, wherein the car body is pivotably supported by means of rollers and roller tracks.
If the car body of a rail vehicle is supported on two or more chassis having active tilting technology systems, there is a danger that the car body may be twisted and loaded in an uncontrolled manner as a result of being controlled differently by the two or more active tilting technology systems. Moreover, the twisting reduces the load on individual wheels, which can in extreme cases result in derailment when travelling through a curve. Such conventional tilting technology systems therefore require a correspondingly costly monitoring device.
The object of the invention is to provide a tilting technology system which offers greater tolerance and simplicity with regard to the cited disadvantages.
This object is inventively achieved by a rail vehicle having tilting technology, wherein the car body is supported on at least two chassis, and wherein at least one of the chassis is connected to the car body via an active tilting technology system and wherein at least one further chassis is connected to the car body via a passive tilting technology system.
In this case, it is advantageous that each chassis on which the car body is supported does not have to have an active tilting technology system. If each car body has two chassis, for example, only one chassis needs to have the active tilting technology system. The tilt of the car body when the rail vehicle travels through a curve is then applied exclusively by means of the one active tilting technology system.
It is also advantageous that the active tilting technology system can be monitored easily and accurately by means of simple software. The cost of cabling for the tilting technology system is also reduced.
The at least one chassis which is connected to the car body via the passive tilting technology system preferably has an instantaneous center that is situated as close as possible to the center of gravity of the car body, preferably in the center of gravity of the car body, in every tilted state of the car body.
An instantaneous center is understood to be the axis of rotation of the car body at an angular instant. If the instantaneous center of the passive tilting technology system lies in the center of gravity of the car body in every tilted state, no righting moment occurs. If the instantaneous center of the passive tilting technology system lies as close as possible to the center of gravity of the car body in every tilted state, only a very limited righting moment occurs.
The instantaneous center preferably lies in the center of gravity of the car body. The tilted state of the car body can then be returned to the horizontal basic state only by means of external dynamic effect, i.e. by means of the active tilting technology system according to the invention. No righting moment is produced by the force of gravity alone in this case. The description of the position of the instantaneous center and the center of gravity assumes a view which is normal relative to a longitudinal axis of the car body.
The tilt of the car body is applied solely by that chassis which is connected to the car body via the active tilting technology system.
This advantageously avoids uncontrolled twisting and loading of the car body, which can occur if every chassis is equipped with an active tilting technology system. A safety risk which occurs as a result of such twisting, owing to the load on individual wheels being reduced when travelling through a curve, is therefore avoided.
In an advantageous embodiment variant, the at least one chassis which is connected to the car body via the active tilting technology system has, in every tilted state of the car body, an instantaneous center that lies next to the line of action of the force of gravity through the center of gravity of the car body.
If the instantaneous center of the active tilting technology system lies next to the line of action of the force of gravity through the center of gravity of the car body in every tilted state of the car body, a righting moment occurs.
This ensures that, if the active tilting technology system fails, the car body is automatically moved from the tilted state into the horizontal basic state by the action of the force of gravity.
The description of the position of the instantaneous center and the center of gravity assumes a view which is normal relative to a longitudinal axis of the car body.
In an advantageous embodiment, the car body is pivotably supported on the at least one further chassis having a passive tilting technology system by means of rollers running in roller tracks.
According to a further advantageous embodiment, the car body is pivotably connected to the at least one chassis having an active tilting technology system by means of a pendulum mechanism.
The car body may also be pivotably supported, by means of rollers running in roller tracks, on all chassis having a passive tilting technology system and on all chassis having an active tilting technology system.
Such supports have the advantage of exhibiting very little rolling resistance. In comparison with the prior art, it is therefore possible to use smaller, less powerful and more economical actuators on the chassis having the active tilting technology system, said actuators moving the car body from the tilted state to the horizontal basic state and vice versa.
The invention is explained in greater detail with reference to exemplary schematic figures in which:
The rail vehicle 1 illustrated in
The tilt of the car body 2 is applied solely by the second chassis 6 having the active tilting technology system 4.
This ensures that, if the active tilting technology system 4 fails, the car body 2 is automatically moved from the tilted state into the horizontal basic state due to the effect of the force of gravity.
The car body 2 may also be pivotably supported, by means of rollers 7 running in roller tracks 8, on all chassis 3, 6 having a passive tilting technology system 5 and on all chassis 3, 6 having an active tilting technology system 4.
Such supports have the advantage of exhibiting very little rolling resistance. In comparison with the prior art, it is therefore possible to use smaller, less powerful and more economical actuators 14 on the chassis 6 having the active tilting technology system 4, said actuators 14 moving the car body 2 from the tilted state to the horizontal basic state and vice versa.
Using the inventive rail vehicle 1, the tilt of the car body 2 is applied exclusively by means of the active tilting technology system 4. This avoids uncontrolled twisting and loading of the car body 2.
The inventive solution is not restricted to the cited examples, and other embodiments are also possible.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
A 50034/2013 | Jan 2013 | AT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/050806 | 1/16/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/114553 | 7/31/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3628465 | Dobson | Dec 1971 | A |
5222440 | Schneider | Jun 1993 | A |
5351624 | Ahlborn | Oct 1994 | A |
20020035947 | Sebata | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20040016361 | Teichmann | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20060117986 | Schneider | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070137515 | Schneider | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20120118194 | Schneider | May 2012 | A1 |
20120180693 | Haas | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120227617 | Schneider | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130018535 | Schneider | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20160001793 | Haigermoser | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160257318 | Kuter | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2001100012 | Aug 2001 | AU |
4423636 | Jan 1996 | DE |
4446002 | Jan 1996 | DE |
4444540 | Nov 1996 | DE |
19522378 | Jan 1997 | DE |
10316497 | Jan 2005 | DE |
0287821 | Oct 1988 | EP |
0619212 | Oct 1994 | EP |
2002154432 | May 2002 | JP |
9003906 | Apr 1990 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150367868 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |