The present disclosure relates generally to food product mixing, and, more particularly, to a rapid-agitation mixer for food products.
The preparation of many different food and beverage products has evolved greatly over time. For instance, in addition to formulaic and/or recipe changes, many different types of machines, appliances, and processes have been created, allowing for simplified production, automated production, mass production and/or distribution, and so on. While certain of these changes have occurred at food or beverage processing plants, many improvements have also been presented in the area of food and beverage services, such as for restaurants, convenience stores, and home use.
Milkshakes, malts, and other ice cream mixtures are one such area where improved machines and/or processes have been offered in an effort to provide a consumer with an optimal product for consumption. For example, since consistency is a major factor in milkshake enjoyment, many advances have been made regarding their blending, whipping, stirring, etc., where typically, a rotary blade or mixer is either lowered into a container holding the consumable content, or else the container is advanced towards the rotary blade/mixer to move the container's contents into contact with the blade/mixer.
When implemented at a restaurant (e.g., an ice cream shop), a server generally takes an order from a customer, inserts the appropriate contents into the container (e.g., ice cream, candies, flavor syrups, etc.), and then mixes the product to the desired consistency using an associated mixing/blending machine. Prior to mixing another product with different ingredients, the machine's components (e.g., blades/mixers/etc.) should then be cleaned by the server in order to avoid cross-contamination between orders, and to remain a generally clean food-service environment.
More recent technological advances have allowed for a milkshake or other frozen drink to be made quickly from a block of ingredients pre-frozen into a serving cup. For instance, a consumer may now choose the type or flavor to be prepared, and insert the pre-packaged container into an automated machine, which automatically inserts the blades/mixers into the container, and mixes/blends the contents to provide the finished product, e.g. the blended milkshake, at the desired consistency, to the consumer. In some machines, various ingredients may also be added to the mixture during the mixing/blending, such as milk, water, syrups, candies, etc. These types of machines thus minimize or eliminate the requirement of a specialized server, and certain of these machines also have provisions for automating the cleaning of the blades/mixers and various splash shields that are in place to protect the user and surrounding environment from contents that spill from the containers during use.
The one or more embodiments of the present invention described herein advance the production of foods and beverages (“food products” herein), particularly for milkshakes, malts, or other ice cream beverages, beyond the current technologies described above.
In particular, in one embodiment, a rapid-agitation mixer for food products comprises a product holder configured to hold a sealed product cup containing a food product to be mixed, and a drive shaft along an agitation axis, the drive shaft configured to secure the product holder and product cup in place. The illustrative mixer also comprises a drive motor configured to reciprocate the drive shaft in opposing directions, where the product holder correspondingly reciprocates the product cup to churn the food product within the product cup.
Other specific embodiments and implementations are described in greater detail below, and this brief summary is not meant to be limiting to the scope of protection of the invention described herein.
The embodiments herein may be better understood by referring to the following description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals indicate identically or functionally similar elements, of which:
As noted above, milkshakes, malts, and other ice cream mixtures are one such area where improved machines and/or processes have been offered in an effort to provide a consumer with an optimal product for consumption. Current systems, however, suffer from one or more inefficiencies. For example, cleanliness is a major concern for food preparation, both in terms of sanitary conditions as well as for cross-contamination of products. Though many systems are in place currently that provide for automated cleaning (e.g., water sprayers, wash-downs, etc.), such systems are generally meant to mitigate the inevitable spillage from the associated food product preparation process. Other systems in use today may attempt to reduce the amount of overall clean-up required, such as by covering the food container into which the blades/mixers are to be inserted prior to the mixing/blending, but such systems only reduce the amount of spillage outside of the food container during the preparation, and still require cleaning of the blades/mixers after each use.
Furthermore, as noted above, the consistency of such semi-frozen food products is an important factor in consumer enjoyment. Achieving the desired consistency has been limited to the use of blades, mixers, paddles, or other objects being inserted into and moved within the food product, such as by stirring, blending, agitating, pulverizing, etc. In certain systems currently in use in the art, the blending object may be integrated within the food container, where a rotating motor contacts with an engaging member of the container in order to correspondingly rotate the blending mechanism within the container (e.g., much like a household blender operation). Such systems, however, come at an increased container expense and complexity, and leave the blending mechanism inside the container during consumer consumption of the product.
As described in greater detail below, the mixer 100 uses increased force created by controlled movement of the product cup 300 in order to mix the food product. Specifically, through internal mixing completely inside of a sealed product cup 300, the mixer 100 operates in a manner that can take a heterogeneous solid, semi-solid, or liquid food product, whether frozen, semi-frozen, or un-frozen, and turn it into a generally homogenous consumable food product (e.g., a milkshake).
Illustratively, the example food product mixer 100 may comprise a mixing chamber 110 into which the food product cup 300 may be placed, and a protective door 120 that may be manually or automatically controlled to open and close (e.g., in either implementation with one or more sensors to ensure that the door is closed prior to operation of the mixer 100). Note that while the door 120 is shown opening and closing in a side-to-side manner, any other suitable opening/closing motion (e.g., up-and-down motion) are suitable for use with the embodiments herein. The food product mixer 100 may also comprise one or more user interface features 130, such as various control buttons, touch screen displays, wireless interfaces (e.g., for smartphone access, maintenance, etc.) and so on.
In general, the food product mixer 100 may be designed for direct and straightforward use by the consumer, such as for self-serve stations at restaurants, convenience stores, homes, cafeterias, hotels, fairs, college campuses, etc.
An important aspect of the mixer 100 and procedure 200 above is to provide a simplified end-user experience of the mixer 100, that is repeatable without servicing the mixer (e.g., manual or automated cleaning). That is, the product cup 300 can be selected directly from a product placement display (e.g., a freezer/refrigerator), placed into the mixer 100, and mixed. This efficient process generally requires no user intervention to create the desired mixture (e.g., no added ingredients), no user intervention to properly mix the product (e.g., moving the cup 300 around to ensure adequate mixing), and no per-use cleanup (except in the case of an accidental product cup breach). Note, however, that although the simplified design of the example mixer 100 is important, both in terms of the user interface and the overall ease-of-operation, such simplification is not necessary to the internal workings and functionality of the mixer as described below, and the scope of the present invention is not intended to be limited to the example implementation shown in
According to the illustrative techniques herein, the user operation of the mixer 100 may be as simple as inserting the product cup 300 into the chamber 110, and pressing a single “start” button (user interface component 130), such that the mixer 100 may perform the remainder of the mixing operation autonomously (e.g., closing the door 120, securing the cup, mixing, etc.). In one embodiment, this type of “insert and mix” operation assumes the same mixing parameters for all food products to be mixed the same way. Alternatively or in addition, the mixer 100 may also be configured to change various aspects of the mixing procedure, for example, various mixing parameters such as duration, speed, etc. (described below). These adjustments may be requested by the user (e.g., entering preferences through user interface 130), or else they may be adjusted automatically by the mixer 100 based on a determination (e.g., user selection and/or sensing) of various product-specific characterizations.
As mentioned above, another important aspect of the mixer 100 is its cleanliness, and this is illustratively accomplished in one or more ways. First, by allowing the product cup 300 to remain completely sealed throughout the mixing process, there are no components of the mixer 100 that are purposefully contacting the food product within the cup 300, such as blades, paddles, agitators, etc.
As stated previously, the sealed cup 300 need not be opened during the mixing, and preferably (where pre-filled by the factory) need not be opened prior to the mixing, either. That is, by supplying pre-made, single-serve product cups 300 with the desired food product contents (e.g., milkshake ingredients), no mixes need to be added, no contamination need occur, and no mess needs to be created inside with mixer 100. For example, if a consumer wishes to have a vanilla shake, he or she simply picks the product cup 300 containing the vanilla shake, places it into the mixer 100, starts the mixer, and removes the product cup to enjoy the vanilla shake. Conversely, if another consumer then wishes to have a cookies and cream shake, he or she simply picks the product cup 300 containing the cookies and cream shake, places it into the mixer 100, starts the mixer, and removes the product cup to enjoy the cookies and cream shake. No cleaning need take place, no additives need be supplied, and no time is wasted. (Notably, after the product is mixed, the consumer can certainly open the cup 300 and add his or her own ingredients to the mixed food product.)
To protect against accidental breach of the product cup 300, as well as other sources of potential contamination of the mixer's mixing chamber 110 (e.g., external cup contamination and/or condensation), an addition layer of protection may be afforded by one or more embodiments herein. In particular, a cup holder and cup cover may surround the product cup 300, thus providing a “double seal” with the product cup's seal 330.
Notably, in one embodiment the cup cover 420 lifts directly away from the cup holder 410 (e.g., straight up and down) with enough clearance to allow insertion of the product cup 300 into the cup holder. In another embodiment, the cup cover 420 may additionally or alternatively be moved (e.g., twisted, rotated, pivoted, hinged, etc.) out of the way to allow access for the product cup 300.
Note further that although one particular “coverage ratio” of the cup holder 410 to the cup cover 420 is shown, i.e., how much of the product cup 300 is contained within the holder 410 versus the cover 420, any suitable ratio may be used. For example, the ratio may range all the way from 0-100% for either the holder 410 or the cover 420, such as ranging from a simple base upon which the product cup 300 rests (such that the cover contains 100% of the product cup) to a completely encompassing cup holder (such that the cover merely closes off the top of the holder). Also, other shapes or configurations of the cover 420 and the holder 410 are possible, and the view illustrated is merely an illustrative example.
As an additional measure for cleanliness, the illustrative mixer 100 may also comprise a cleaning basin 430 that essentially forms the mixing chamber 110, surrounding the internal mixing mechanisms. In a preferred embodiment, the door 120 may be located inside of this cleaning basin 430, though the door may also be located outside of the basin. With this cleaning basin 430, any drips or spills may be contained and easily cleaned without contaminating other components of the mixer 100 (e.g., motors, electronics, etc.).
Behind the operation of the mixer 100 is the hardware and software required for operability. In particular,
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that other processor and memory types, including various computer-readable media, may be used to store and execute program instructions pertaining to the techniques described herein. For example, the system 500 may be microprocessor controlled, microcontroller controlled, or other control by embedded systems/processors/etc. Also, while the description illustrates various processes, it is expressly contemplated that various processes may be embodied as modules configured to operate in accordance with the techniques herein (e.g., according to the functionality of a similar process). Further, while the processes have been shown separately, those skilled in the art will appreciate that processes may be routines or modules within other processes.
In terms of functionality, the interrelated features of the system 100 herein may be implemented by the processes 542-546, which contain computer executable instructions executed by the processor 520 to perform such functions either singly or in various combinations. For instance, network operations process 542 may allow for communication over network interfaces 510 for various purposes, such as remote system maintenance (e.g., software upgrades, firmware updates, system analytics, etc.), product metric tracking (e.g., quantities purchased, types of products purchased, etc.), social communication (e.g., displayed content/marketing, consumer feedback, etc. via the user interface 130), communication with auxiliary components (e.g., refrigerators and freezers), and so on.
The user interface process 543, in particular, allows for interaction with a consumer through user interface 130 (received internally for processing by user interface 515), whether it be detection of a single “start” button, selection of particular mixing and/or product parameters via a touch screen, or other user interfaces. User interface process 542 may also interact wirelessly (via network interface 510) with a user, such as via apps on a smart device (smartphone, tablet, etc.), for user preference information, customer loyalty coordination, social media connectivity, and so on. As a separate component, or else integrated with user interface 130 and process 543, the customer interaction (e.g., point of sale) process 546 may comprise any necessary programming and authentication processes to interact financially with the customer, such as receiving credit card information through user interface 130 and processing such payment information with a financial server (via network operations process 542), printing receipts, etc.
Mechanics operation process 544 contains computer executable instructions executed by the processor 520 to perform functions related to the mechanical operations of the mixing mechanisms, such as controlling doors, cup covers, specific mixer motions (e.g., directions, duration, frequency, speed, distance, etc.). Specifically, the mechanics operation process 544 may control various actuators and/or motors to direct their functionality as they relate to the system processes as described herein.
Lastly, product detection process 545 may be configured to detect presence of a product. For example, the product detection process 545 may be used to prevent operation of the mixer 100 without a product or without an authorized product. For example, attempting to mix without a product in place may cause damage to certain components expecting the weight/presence of the product, while attempting to mix with unauthorized products (such as misplacing a carbonated drink into the mixer or other unsuitable objects) may also be problematic. Certain sensors may be in place to ensure proper product placement, such as weight, visual, RFID, etc. In addition, in certain embodiments, the product detection process 545 may also be used to detect actual product characteristics, such as weight, temperature, product type/identification, etc., as mentioned above.
Note that while certain processes and functionalities are shown and described herein, any suitable set of control processes may be used in accordance with the techniques herein, and those shown herein are merely one example implementation. Additional or fewer processes may actually be used, whether enabling the same level of functionality or more or less functionality, accordingly.
Additionally,
In addition, in certain embodiments, one or more freezers, coolers, and/or refrigerators 640 may also be networked within the communication network 600. For instance, the device(s) 640 may be in local communication with an associated mixer 100, or else via individual communication with the network 610 (e.g., to servers 620). Connected devices 640 allow for the monitoring and feedback control of temperatures, detection of product inventory, etc. In general, the devices 640 may be purpose-built in association with the mixers 100 (e.g., manufacturer-specific and designed for such monitoring and communication), or else may simply be standard devices with added capability components (e.g., stand-alone sensors inserted into the devices, etc.).
In accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention, a specific mixing technique may be used as the mixing mechanism for the mixer 100 described above. That is, as mentioned above, the mixer 100 mixes a food product (e.g., mostly frozen) to a desired consistency without opening a sealed product cup 300 and without the use mixing blades, agitators, paddles, etc. being inserted into the food product. Specifically, the mixer 100 uses increased force created by controlled movement of the product cup 300 in order to mix the food product, where internal mixing occurs completely inside of the sealed product cup 300.
In particular,
Examples of food product mixing within a mixing cup 300 using a rapid-agitation mixer are shown in
The effectiveness of the product mixing using mixing mechanism 900 in mixer 100 is based on a variety of configured and/or adjustable parameters, such as the speed of the agitation (e.g., oscillation frequency), as well as the distance of the “throw” or “swing” in either the up and down directions. Also, the effects of one parameter may require changes to one or more other parameters.
As one example, the distance of the throw can be chosen based on the desired outcome when used with particular agitation speeds, or vice versa. For instance, depending on the thickness of the food product (e.g., milkshake) for which the machine is designed, the agitation speed may need to be faster or slower to produce a desired mixing force on the food product. The same holds true for the distance of the throw to produce a desired mixing force within the product cup.
Generally, the rate of agitation within which rapid-agitation mixing may usefully take place is established as a lower threshold, below which no mixing occurs, and an upper threshold, above which no mixing occurs. The goal, therefore, is to agitate the product at a value between those lower and upper thresholds, accordingly.
Experimentally, a range of about 500-2000 cpm (cycles per minute) resulted in good mixing qualities for the milkshakes, where speeds around 1200-1400 cpm of vertical agitation was a preferred lower threshold for mixing a good milkshake. The distance of the throw or swing was also generally limited to approximately 10-60 mm. Note that any suitable values may be used so long as adequate mixing is provided without separating out solids or otherwise creating an undesired consistency of the final product.
Another factor to consider is the duration of the mixing. In general, there is a lower limit to the mixing time required to adequately mix the food product and to create the desired consistency, as well as an upper limit to the time to prevent over-mixing and producing a diminished consistency. (User perception of the wait time is also an important factor in the duration of the mixing.) Through the experimentation above, suitable mixing may occur between 10 and 45 seconds, preferably after about 20-30 seconds of mixing.
In addition,
Note that in one or more embodiments herein, it may be optional to provide heat to the product cup 300 during the mixing described above. Generally, it has been determined that external heating is not required in the mix time allotted, and all observed increases in temperature in the product is due to the physical act of mixing (physical movement at the molecular level). Also, when there is no an ambient air heating, the techniques herein are able to close off the cup holder 410 with cap 420 to help avoid catastrophic spills inside the machine during mixing. At the same time, however, it may be possible and desirable to provide heat to the product, and as such,
It should be noted that while certain steps within procedures 200 and 1400 may be optional as described above, the steps shown in
Notably, the embodiments described herein may be applied to any suitable food product, and particularly to any type of ice cream used to make a milkshake, malt, or other ice cream beverages. In particular, the operating ranges of the mixing mechanics described in the embodiment above herein may generally be applicable to any formula of ice cream, including any set of ingredients, a wide range of product temperatures, and so on. That is, the dimensions of the product, the relative orientations, the speeds or frequencies of the mixing, the duration of the mixing, etc. can be set to a general configuration to handle many variations in product characteristics, or else may be adjusted manually or in response to one or more product characterizations.
In addition, the specific placement of components in relation to each other, particularly driving motors, can be anywhere that is suitable for various design considerations within the mixer 100. Also, where any gears, drive belts, or chains are specifically mentioned above, such driving mechanisms may be interchanged.
Other alternative orientations of the mixer 100 may also be contemplated with substantially similar results to those orientations shown and described above, where various mechanisms can be mounted in any orientation that is advantageous to loading the product cup 300 or to machine layout and/or performance. For instance,
In addition, a counterbalancing system may be used in certain embodiments in order to balance the high-speed agitation of the system, and to thus prevent problematic vibrations. For instance,
The systems and techniques described in detail above thus provide for an advanced automated food product mixer. In particular, the techniques herein offer an enhanced consumer experience, being simple to use and effective in producing an optimal consumable product, particularly in terms of product consistency. The system herein also has provisions for cleanliness that are not available in current systems, improving both sanitary conditions of the system as well as eliminating cross-contamination of products, each being especially beneficial for systems where multiple consumers use the machine without server intervention, such as when placed in convenience stores or self-serve stations at restaurants.
While there have been shown and described illustrative embodiments, it is to be understood that various other adaptations and modifications may be made within the spirit and scope of the embodiments herein, regardless of whether they were specifically mentioned herein. For instance, certain techniques or features that are currently understood in the art may be viable alterations to the examples described above (e.g., in terms of both the food product itself as well as mechanical or electrical components of the automated machinery).
In addition, while the system and techniques above have been generally described in terms of food products relating to milkshakes, malts, or other ice cream beverages, other food products (solid, semi-solid, liquid, frozen, thawed, semi-frozen, etc.) may take advantage of the techniques above, where applicable. Accordingly, the present invention, though preferably directed toward milkshakes, malts, or other ice cream-like beverages, is not intended to be limited as such.
Furthermore, it is also expressly contemplated that certain components and/or elements described herein can be implemented as software being stored on a tangible (non-transitory) computer-readable medium (e.g., disks, CDs, RAM, EEPROM, etc.) having program instructions executing on a computer, hardware, firmware, or a combination thereof.
Accordingly, this description is to be taken only by way of example and not to otherwise limit the scope of the embodiments herein. Therefore, it is the object of the appended claims to cover all such variations and modifications as come within the true spirit and scope of the embodiments herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3181841 | Boehm | May 1965 | A |
3706443 | Oberhauser | Dec 1972 | A |
3941357 | Wurtz | Mar 1976 | A |
4523855 | Walker | Jun 1985 | A |
4697929 | Muller | Oct 1987 | A |
4737372 | Bender | Apr 1988 | A |
4834548 | Tempel et al. | May 1989 | A |
5102229 | Wada et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5150967 | Neilson et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5302020 | Kruse | Apr 1994 | A |
5352037 | Jouvin | Oct 1994 | A |
5507575 | Rossetti | Apr 1996 | A |
5547275 | Lillelund et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5653157 | Miller | Aug 1997 | A |
5803377 | Farrell | Sep 1998 | A |
5868065 | Haggerty et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5884999 | Muzzio et al. | May 1999 | A |
5962060 | Farrell | Oct 1999 | A |
6041961 | Farrell | May 2000 | A |
6326047 | Farrell | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6421583 | Sudolcan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6465034 | Farrell | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6474862 | Farrell | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6527207 | Farrell et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6755565 | Flackett | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7036334 | Ko et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7059763 | Sordelli et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7144150 | Farrell | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7325969 | Kretzschmar et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7448546 | Jung et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7520658 | Farrell | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7520662 | Farrell | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7604392 | Brezinsky et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7726136 | Baxter et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7806294 | Gatipon et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
1001347 | Chaudhuri et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
1002050 | Santoiemmo | Jan 2011 | A1 |
7890213 | Greco et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7908871 | Baxter et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8151577 | Bucceri | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8336731 | Farrell et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8459043 | Bertone | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8651730 | Barbi | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20030046377 | Daum et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050193896 | McGill | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20080279040 | Neilson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090083000 | Sherman et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090120306 | DeCarlo et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090193823 | Lee et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100239723 | Pendergast et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110013477 | Kozlowski et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110088558 | Farrell et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110088568 | Farrell et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110090756 | Farrell et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110239868 | Farrell et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120128834 | Westdijk et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130280385 | Arns et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130284029 | Reed et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130341439 | Farrell et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130341446 | Farrell et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130343150 | Farrell et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130344220 | Farrell et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130344221 | Farrell et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140016431 | Takenaka et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140161946 | Torricelli et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188271 | Hernandez et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140199445 | Torricelli et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140293729 | Ni et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140295044 | Cocchi et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102883622 | Jan 2013 | CN |
0945170 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1026978 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1114673 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1279359 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2413118 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2857574 | Jan 2005 | FR |
WO-1993005345 | Mar 1993 | WO |
WO-2006077237 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2006082214 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO-2010064042 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO-2013090768 | Jun 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
FR 2 857 574, Jan. 2005, Hurtebise, machine translation. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 11, 2016 in connection with PCT/US2016/021928. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160262573 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |