The invention relates to a reactor and a method for decalcifying water and simultaneous removal of pollutants as well as reduction of the turbidity and disinfection in a reactor with feed and discharge without the additional of chemicals and filters according to the generic term of Claim 1.
Such a reactor and method are principally known from DE 10247686.
Further, calcium hydrate precipitation, inoculation devices for formation of calcium carbonate and ion exchangers are well known for decalcifying water. These methods are chemical processes. But there are also methods working on a physical basis. This also includes decalcification by changing the crystal structure in the magnetic field, e.g. DE 43 36 388, cavitation, reverse osmosis, membrane filtration. Further, there are thermal processing methods, e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 5,858,248, which achieves decalcification and elimination of pollutants by hydrodynamic optimisation of the reactor to heat the water.
In patent DE 102 47 686 and publication WO 2004/035487 A1, not only the hydrodynamic situation in the reactor is optimised, but the water is simultaneously aerated. This results in a more effective decalcification and elimination of pollutants, also below the boiling point of the water.
For all the named processes, a positive influence on removal of scale or prevention of scale formation in installations is mainly certified. In the thermal process, a simultaneous reduction of scale, drop in turbidity and elimination of pollutants in the water is made possible. The detriment in these processes, however, is the fact that either the technique is complicated and can only be practicable and profitable for larger amounts of water or that the technique is not practical and effective enough.
The disadvantage of thermal processes (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,858,248) is for example that the turbulence and mixing of the water up to the boiling point of the water is low, which is why simultaneous decalcification, elimination of pollutants and removal of volatile pollutants can only be done effectively with the help of this process at boiling point with long further heating at this temperature. To this extent, this process can, for example, not be used for decalcification of the water for use in hot-water installations, where the water is heated to about 70° C., due to the high costs. Further, it works with the help of a filter cartridge, which has to be replaced and regenerated externally when it is worn out. Further, this process is only suited for the cases in which production of oxygen-free water is required. Oxygen-free water may well be a benefit for production, but it is not beneficial for health. And last, it is suited for treatment of major quantities of water in industry as a result of the relatively complicated design of the system, but is less suited for household use and similar.
The disadvantages of the aforementioned US patent have partly been remedied by patent DE 10247689, but this technique does not work effectively as an intensive micro-mixing of the water takes place practically only below the first plate in the direct vicinity of the source of heat and only on the reactor wall for further plates. Accordingly, the treatment of the water takes longer. As the plates are further not fitted to the reactor wall and can be removed from the reactor, additional heating and aeration between the plates and within the reactor are ruled out. Finally, the plates are fitted to the lid with one or two rods, for which reason manual re-filling the devices, which work discontinuously, with water is only possible when the lid is removed from the treatment area together with the plate(s). With hot water and on larger devices, this causes problems.
The techniques which work with the help of ion exchangers, activated carbon filters and similar absolutely need electrical energy on the one hand and are very sensitive towards sediments in the water and block very easily on the other hand, with the result that they are only suited as a rule for processing clear tap water, especially for use in the household area. Otherwise, the water has to be pre-treated externally.
The task of the invention in question is to improve the aforementioned reactor and process in such a way that it can avoid the problems described even without the use of chemicals and filters and decalcify water without great requirements of apparatus and maintenance, simultaneously eliminate pollutants from the water, reduce the turbidity of the work and result in disinfection. A further objective is to release scale deposits from the heat transmission surfaces both in continuous and also dis- and semi-continuous reactor devices and not to lead to a permanent formation of a crust. The reactor in accordance with the invention ought to be produced as far as possible in all sizes from 0.5 litres upwards and make variable process guidance possible.
The task and the objective are solved with a view to the appliance by the reactor identified in Claim 1 and with a view to the process by the process according to Claim 6.
The flow in the heating of water is more or less laminar and more or less takes place in the internal area of the water. As a result of the firmly fitted plates, provided with bores, in the plates in the reactor with aeration, the laminar flow is converted into a turbulent flow in the invention on the one hand. This results in an intensive micro-mixing of the water in all areas of the reactor. Alongside this, the turbulence is guided as far as possible into the vicinity of the phase limit surface (reactor wall), in order to enlarge the exchange of substances there and to accelerate the heterogeneous formation of seed crystals. The heterogeneous and secondary seed formation take place at lower oversaturation. On the other hand, the firmly fitted plates and their specific arrangement result in sequential areas in the reactor in which the water temperature in the vicinity of the source of heat rises more quickly than in other areas. In such a case, the temperature differences between individual areas are a multiple of 10° C. As a result, there is a faster formation of seeds and crystal growth there. As a result of these seeds and crystals, which later partly penetrate into other areas, there is an automatic inoculation and secondary crystallisation in remaining areas, leading to a quicker sequence of the process all told together with heterogeneous formation of seeds and crystals.
The crystallisation of hardness minerals in water is precipitation crystallisation. As is known, crystallisation generally takes place more quickly by inoculation by related crystals. In precipitation crystallisation specifically, the crystallisation only commences at a higher oversaturation, with heterogeneous seed formation playing a larger role than homogeneous. The seed formation and the crystal growth are additionally supported by the suitable material with large surface energy between the reactor wall and water. There are reports that gas bubbles as outside particles also support heterogeneous seed formation. Not only macro-, but also micro-mixing of the reaction partners has a positive effect on seed formation in precipitation crystallisation. In the precipitation of carbonates in water, quick stripping of the carbon dioxide from the water also plays a role. Aeration and production of intensive mixing zones underneath the plates with simultaneous desorption of the carbon dioxide result in the crystallisation beginning at a considerably lower oversaturation than is otherwise the case and a long way below the boiling point.
In the process according to patent DE 10247686, an intensive micro-mixing practically only takes place underneath the first plate and in the process according to U.S. Pat. No. 5,858,248 quick stripping of the carbon dioxide is only made possible at the boiling point.
Stripping of the carbon dioxide and crystallisation at lower oversaturation further mean that more carbon dioxide and thus carbonates are removed from the water. This effect for its part means that the pH value of the water rises higher than in decalcification in conventional reactors with the help of this process. A higher pH value leads to an increase in carbonate precipitation, with these two factors together finally leading to a better physical and chemical precipitation of sediments, phosphates and hydroxides of metal and heavy metal.
For these reasons, the process in suited not only to the treatment of tap water, but also to the treatment of surface and ground water with a high share of sediments as well as some waste waters.
It is known that oversaturation of hardness minerals is achieved more easily on warmer contact surfaces (heating surface and reactor wall) for seed formation than in water and that crystallisation of these salts primarily takes place on these surfaces. Although the deflection of the water flow to the vicinity of the reactor wall results in the laminar layer in this area becoming smaller and the exchange of material and energy being favoured, it is however seen in practice that, alongside a micro-mixing to the reactor walls, this also plays an important role in other areas of the water in crystallisation. As a result of an optimised arrangement of the plates and the possibility of a faster sequential heating and inoculation of further areas together, prerequisites for a better use of the reactor and the energy to be fed can be created.
In the reactors with moving plates or cartridges, it is only possible to further the crystallisation in further areas by an additional lateral heating of the reactor. However, the loss of heat in this context is very high compared with direct heating in water—e.g. by an electric heating spiral—. The possibility of a direct heating exists in the reactor with firmly fitted plates. The same also applies to the feed of air.
Depending on the desired objectives in treatment, the water is not only heated and aerated, but if necessary either its temperature is kept constant by lower provision of heat than before in this range of temperatures and/or the aeration is continued for a longer period.
As a result of the possibility of sequential heating according to the invention and earlier boiling of the water in the immediate vicinity of the source of heat, water vapour occurs in this area, rising through the bores on the edge of the fitted plates in the form of small bubbles and likewise contributing to a micro-mixing of the water in the upper area. In other words, if aeration is not possible or not desirable for certain reasons, a considerable effect can nevertheless be achieved in the reactor with a slight delay. This possibility is not optimal in the aforementioned thermal methods.
In the aforementioned thermal methods, there is also a certain sequential heating and formation of vapour in the immediate vicinity of the source of heating; however, vapour and air rise in the form of large bubbles, which, unlike small bubbles, do not effectively lead to a mixing of the water and an exchange of material, even if air distributors are used in the reactor in the method in patent DE 10247686. The reasons are on the one hand that the surface tension of the water drops with a rise in temperature and thus the bubbles are formed too large, mainly as a result of coalescence. The plates further contribute to the small air bubbles colliding and forming larger bubbles.
This problem is solved in the reactor according to the invention by means of firmly fitted plates in such a way that the large bubbles are made smaller to form small homogeneous bubbles when passing through the small bores on the edge of the plate and rise in a fine distribution in the vicinity of the reactor wall. But the plate fitted above this only has one large bore in the middle, however none at the edge. In this way, the bubbles are steered in the middle of this phase when they rise, resulting in an intensive mixing in this area as well.
As far as the reactor material with a view to the precipitation crystallisation is concerned, the seed forming work is reduced on surfaces with a good wettability by water and higher surface energy of the contract surface.
A further function of the firmly fitted plates and the plate(s) not fitted to the reactor wall is that the scale deposits do not form adherent growing crystals, but loose (amorphous) and layered crystals, which have a lower adhesive capacity, as a result of the intensive mixing and possible boiling of the water. In a turbulent flow, tensions occur, loosening the crystals from time to time and passing them on to the water. In this way, a calcification of the reactor is avoided and the passage of heat as a result of calcification of the heating surface is not reduced. Finally, heating the water above 70° C. also acts as a secure method of sterilising the water and killing off the legionellae in the water.
The simplest version of this appliance according to the invention is a discontinuous or semi-continuous device or reactor heated and aerated from below with the help of an external source of energy. In the treatment area of this reactor, two plates at a distance to the floor for segmental heating of the water and steering of the flow as well as reinforcement of the turbulence on the reactor wall and micro-mixing within the water have been fitted. The plates have been arranged horizontally. The lower plate has small bores going around the edge and a large bore in the middle. The second plate only has one large bore. To start with, the reactor is filled with water from the top. After this, a device comprising a plate and cylindrical or conical metal parts, which are fitted centred to a holder, are inserted into the bores in such a way that the lowest central bore is completely closed and the upper bore is closed at a distance.
The plates can also be fitted in the reactor by them being connected with one another beforehand with the help of two or three rods and then being pushed into the reactor together, so that they can also be pulled out again if necessary.
The moving upper plate contributes on the one hand to the micro-mixing of the water above the fitted plates and on the other hand to the attenuation of the boiling process in this area. When the water is poured out after the treatment, the residues remain on the plates and the base of the reactor. The residues are removed after multiple treatment of the water by tipping the container over. For this, the device is removed from the middle of the reactor. In this way, the reactor in accordance with the invention needs no further maintenance or similar with the exception of simple removal of the residues.
To reduce the volume of the water remaining in the treatment area, the latter has been narrowed somewhat at the bottom for discontinuous or semi-continuous operation.
During the treatment, sediments float in the water. If it is possible to remove the water from the reactor even during the treatment or the boiling, a screen connected to the discharge tap will prevent it from flowing out.
Depending on the task, the water treated in this way can be removed from the treatment area for decalcification and reduction of the pollutants immediately after treatment or removal can only be necessary after cooling off in the treatment area, as compounds frequently have lower solubility at low temperatures.
Further advantages and features can be seen from the sub-claims, which can also be of significance for the invention together with the main claim. Below, preferred embodiments of the invention are explained on the basis of the diagram for better understanding. It should be clear that the invention is not limited to the examples shown.
We see:
In
In
In
The scales for larger reactors for dis- and semi-continuous operation can be enlarged at will complying with the aforementioned optimisations, heated and aerated in every phase and the number of plates increased. To save energy, the treatment area can also be provided with insulation material and the loss of heat thus reduced.
In
For continuous operation of the device according to the invention, the system comprises a reactor and a bubble column, where the water is only further aerated after treatment in the first reactor (
Further fields of use of the reactor and method according to the invention without or with use of chemicals are, for example, drinking water, surface water and waste water processing as well as sludge treatment in general.
So if a thermal treatment of water for elimination of pollutants in the reactor developed according to the invention is not sufficient, chemicals and gases (e.g. pure oxygen or ozone) can be added to the water if needed.
It is also possible to attach a firmly fitted UV radiator to each level of the treatment area in order to enable or accelerate oxidation of further pollutants.
Basically, the thermal reactor according to the invention is a high-performance reactor for chemical reaction management, which can also be used in other areas of chemical reaction management.
The method can be used to save chemicals as a sensible preliminary to micro-, ultra-, nano-filtration and in particular reverse osmosis.
Heating of the treatment room can be done not only electrically, but also by a corresponding change with the help of fossil or renewable sources of energy. To this extent, the reactor according to the invention can generally be used for treatment of water in general for decentralised drinking water processing for consumers and above all in regions without electrical energy connection and catastrophe areas.
Further, the following features alone or also together can be significant for the invention:
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP06/02773 | 3/27/2006 | WO | 00 | 9/24/2008 |