1. Technical Field
The present invention relates to a readout-interface circuit for a capacitive microelectromechanical (MEMS) sensor and to a corresponding sensor; in particular, in what follows reference will be made, without this implying any loss of generality, to a MEMS microphone of a capacitive type.
2. Description of the Related Art
As is known, in the last few years, sensors made using MEMS technologies have constituted one of the most promising areas of research in the field of microtechnologies thanks to their low production costs, small dimensions, and reliability. Furthermore, the readout electronics of these sensors can be advantageously integrated in monolithic form using CMOS techniques in the same microchip in which the detection structures of the sensors are made, to form a true integrated microsystem.
In particular, capacitive MEMS sensors, amongst which accelerometers, pressure sensors, and microphones, have found a wide range of applications, for instance in portable systems, thanks to the simplicity and low power consumption of a corresponding readout electronics. Operation of these sensors is based on the detection of a capacitive variation between a mobile element and a fixed element of a corresponding detection structure, which occurs when the mobile element displaces with respect to the fixed element due to an external stimulus (for example, an acceleration or a force).
By way of example,
The detection structure comprises a body made of semiconductor material 1, for example, silicon, provided with a substrate 2. A buried cavity 3 is formed within the body of semiconductor material 1 and is separated from a top surface 1a of the same body by a fixed region 4. The fixed region 4 is fixed with respect to the substrate 2, and has a plurality of holes (not illustrated) that enable the passage of air from the external environment towards the buried cavity 3. A diaphragm 5 separates the buried cavity 3 from a chamber 6 made from the back of the substrate 2 (known in general as “back-chamber”). The diaphragm 5 is flexible and free to move with respect to the fixed region 4 on account of the pressure exerted by the air. The fixed region 4 (known technically as counter-electrode, or “backplate”) and the diaphragm 5 form, respectively, a fixed plate and a mobile plate, facing one another, of a detection capacitor, the capacitance of which varies according to their relative distance. In use, the diaphragm 5 undergoes deformations due to sound waves reaching the buried cavity 3, causing a corresponding capacitive variation of the detection capacitor, which can be detected by an appropriate electronic readout-interface coupled to the detection structure.
One of the problems of the capacitive MEMS sensors is constituted by the presence of capacitances, or other parasitic elements, which degrade performance of the readout electronics, reducing its sensitivity and introducing non-linearity (in frequency, and/or signal dependent). Among the parasitic elements there may be considered parasitic capacitances intrinsic to the electromechanical detection structure of the sensor, which are related to its particular arrangement, and parasitic capacitances external to the detection structure, which are generated, for example, by the interconnections with the readout electronics and by the interaction with the package. The effect of the intrinsic parasitic capacitances, the presence of which cannot be avoided in such microstructures, is particularly important, given that their value is comparable with, if not even greater than, that of the variable capacitance (generally of low value) on which the detection is based.
A wide range of methods have been proposed for eliminating, or reducing, the effects of the aforesaid parasitic elements, to obtain a readout that is insensitive to disturbance. Some of these (see, for example, Mark Lemkin, Bernhard E. Boser, “A Three-Axis Micromachined Accelerometer with a CMOS Position-Sense Interface and Digital Offset Trim Electronics”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 34, No. 4, April 1999) use digital sampling techniques for minimizing the effects of the parasitic capacitances, whilst others (see, for example, Bernhard E. Boser, Roger T. Howe, “Surface Micromachined Accelerometers”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 33, No. 3, March 1996) resort to analog techniques of active cancellation of the parasitic interconnection capacitances, via the so-called “boot-strapping” technique. The boot-strapping technique envisages the use of continuous-time amplifiers with positive feedback, and has better performance in terms of noise with respect to digital techniques. However, particular attention is to be paid to controlling the factor of positive feedback in order to prevent instability phenomena.
Even though each of the methods proposed has specific advantages and peculiarities, none of them has proven altogether satisfactory.
One embodiment is a readout-interface circuit for a capacitive MEMS sensor, which enables reduction in a more efficient way of the effects of the parasitic capacitances associated to the detection structure, and also having a greater sensitivity and linearity of detection.
For a better understanding of the present invention, preferred embodiments thereof are now described, purely by way of non-limiting example and with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
As illustrated schematically in
In detail, the detection structure 11 (in itself known, for example of the type described in
The readout-interface circuit 12 comprises: a biasing generator 19, which generates a biasing voltage Vp (in particular, a d.c. voltage of constant value), connected between a reference potential (for example, ground) and the second terminal 17 of the detection structure 11; a first biasing resistor 20, connected between the first terminal 16 and the reference potential, having a high value of resistance, for example, of the order of GΩ, in particular equal to 1 GΩ; and an amplification stage 22 with gain A, connected between the first terminal 16 and an output terminal 23 of the readout-interface circuit 12, on which it supplies the output signal Vout. In particular, the voltage of the second terminal 17 of the detection structure 11 is fixed to the biasing voltage Vp and has a low impedance, whilst the first terminal 16, instead, has a high impedance.
The capacitive MEMS sensor 10 moreover has a plurality of parasitic capacitive components, amongst which at least: an external capacitance Cext, which represents the whole of the parasitic capacitances of the sensor external to the detection structure 11; a first intrinsic capacitance CP1 and a second intrinsic capacitance CP2 internal to the detection structure 11 and representing a parasitic capacitance that is generated between the substrate and, respectively, the mobile plate and the fixed plate of the same detection structure (the first parasitic capacitance CP1 representing, in general, the most critical parasitic component in so far as it is connected directly to the readout circuit). In a known way, the external capacitance Cext comprises, for example, a parasitic capacitance of the electrical interconnections (for example, bonding wires) between the detection structure 11 and the readout-interface circuit 12, a parasitic capacitance at input to the readout-interface circuit 12, and “pad” capacitance. The intrinsic capacitances CP1, CP2 are due, for example, to the parasitic capacitive coupling between mutually facing surfaces of the substrate (or of elements connected to the substrate, for example “stoppers”) and of the mobile plate or fixed plate, or to the coupling between respective lines of electrical connection.
In particular, the external capacitance Cext is represented schematically in
The readout-interface circuit 12 further comprises a feedback branch 29, which connects the output terminal 23 (and hence the output of the amplification stage 22) to the third terminal 18 (and hence to the substrate) of the detection structure 11.
In one embodiment (
In use, the presence of the feedback branch 29 causes the substrate of the detection structure 11 to be biased by the output signal Vout at the output of the amplification stage 22, and the first intrinsic capacitor 27 and the second intrinsic capacitor 28 to be driven by the output signal Vout, thus carrying out “boot-strapping” of the same capacitors.
In particular, since corresponding voltage variations are in this way applied to both terminals of the first intrinsic capacitor 27, the parasitic capacitance of this capacitor can be ideally compensated, and the corresponding effects of non-linearity in frequency advantageously removed. In this circuit configuration, the boot-strapping of the second intrinsic capacitor 28 does not affect the performance of the capacitive MEMS sensor 10 in so far as, even though also this capacitor is driven by the output signal Vout, the second terminal 17 to which it is associated remains fixed to the biasing voltage Vp.
It can readily be shown, by applying the principle of charge conservation, that the voltage variation ΔVP1 at the first terminal 16 due to a capacitive variation ΔCm is given by the expression:
where VP1 is the voltage of the first terminal 16 and VP2 is the voltage of the second terminal 17.
In the case where the gain A of the amplification stage 22 is equal to 1, the voltage of the first terminal 16 can be boosted up to a theoretical value (i.e., with the first intrinsic capacitance CP1 fully compensated) given by:
It is shown moreover that a voltage gain Gboost is obtained with respect to a traditional readout-interface circuit (i.e., without the feedback branch 29), given by the expression:
in the case where the capacitive variation ΔCm is negligible with respect to the capacitance at rest Cm0, the fixed capacitance C0, and the external capacitance Cext. For example, a voltage gain is obtained of approximately 6 dB by designing the circuit in such a way that the first intrinsic capacitance CP1 is equal to the sum of the capacitance at rest Cm0, the fixed capacitance C0, and the external capacitance Cext.
Considering once again a gain A equal to 1, it may be verified that in any case an increase of the signal-to-noise ratio SNR is obtained, referred to the first terminal 16, with respect to a traditional interface circuit, that is equal to:
and hence once again approximately equal to 6 dB if the circuit is designed in such a way that the first intrinsic capacitance CP1 is equal to the sum of the capacitance at rest Cm0, of the fixed capacitance C0 and of the external capacitance Cext.
Given that the boot-strapping technique uses a mechanism of positive feedback (the output signal Vout is brought back at input without any phase inversion), to nullify the effect of the parasitic capacitance and boost up the level of the signal and the sensitivity of the circuit, one should ensure stability of the feedback loop. Via an analysis of stability of the circuit, it may be shown that at least one of the following conditions is to be verified: the gain A of the amplification stage 22 is to be smaller than or equal to 1, or else, when higher gain values are used, the value of the parasitic capacitance is to be such as to keep the value of the loop gain less than 1 (the whole of the parasitic capacitances should introduce an attenuation such as to compensate for the increase in gain).
According to a further embodiment, the readout-interface circuit 12 is configured so that also the boot-strapping of the second intrinsic capacitor 28 contributes to the increase of the voltage gain and of the sensitivity of the capacitive MEMS sensor 10.
As illustrated in
In use, the second biasing resistor 34 uncouples the second terminal 17 (and the second intrinsic capacitor 28 connected thereto) from the biasing generator 19, and causes also the second terminal 17 to be effectively driven from the amplification stage 22 through the feedback branch 29 and the second intrinsic capacitor 28, contributing to the increase in the sensitivity of the sensor.
It is possible to show that the voltage variation ΔVP1′ at the first terminal 16 due to the capacitive variation ΔCm, once again considering a unitary gain A of the amplification stage 22, is given by the expression:
By designing the detection structure 11 in such a manner that the second intrinsic capacitance CP2 is much greater than the sum of the capacitance at rest Cm0, the fixed capacitance C0, and the capacitive variation ΔCm, the voltage variation ΔVP1′ is not affected by the values of the parasitic capacitances intrinsic to the detection structure, and depends only on the external capacitance Cext.
In this case, the voltage gain Gboost′ with respect to a traditional readout-interface circuit is given by:
By appropriately sizing the circuit, it is possible, for example, to obtain a voltage gain approximately equal to 20 dB.
Considering a gain A equal to 1, a signal-to-noise ratio SNR referred to the first terminal 16 is obtained, which differs from a traditional interface circuit by the term:
It is consequently possible to appropriately size the circuit so that the described boot-strapping technique does not adversely affect the signal-to-noise ratio (for example, with CP2=CP1, the signal-to-noise ratio does not vary with respect to a traditional circuit).
The behavior of the readout-interface circuit 12 according to the first and second embodiments has been simulated, considering the following values of capacitance: CP1=6.6 pF; CP2=24 pF; Cext=1 pF; Cm0+C0=6 pF; ΔCm=10 fF.
It is also to be noticed that, in the second embodiment of the readout-interface circuit 12, the second biasing resistor 34 introduces an effect of highpass filter in the frequency domain; this circuit will hence not be usable in applications in which it is necessary to detect low-frequency signal components.
From what has been described and illustrated herein, the advantages that the readout-interface circuit makes available are evident.
In particular, the circuit employs a boot-strapping technique for executing a readout that is insensitive to the effects of parasitic capacitances, in particular the intrinsic parasitic capacitances CP1, CP2 of the detection structure 11 of the capacitive MEMS sensor 10 (which represent the most important parasitic components). In this way, an improved linearity of the signal through the entire frequency band is obtained.
Furthermore, the presence of the intrinsic parasitic capacitances CP1, CP2 is exploited actively for increasing the level of the output signal Vout and the sensitivity of the sensor. In this regard, the second embodiment described proves particularly advantageous, since both of the intrinsic parasitic capacitances CP1, CP2 are driven by the output signal Vout of the amplification stage 22 by means of a positive feedback path.
The circuit described does not require more than a single additional resistor, the second biasing resistor 34, with respect to traditional readout techniques (without the need for further additional electronics), and the gain in terms of sensitivity does not adversely affect the signal-to-noise ratio. Furthermore, the presence of the second biasing resistor 34 allows operating the sensor in constant-charge modalities, preventing the “pull-in” phenomenon.
Finally, it is clear that modifications and variations can be made to what is described and illustrated herein, without thereby departing from the scope of the present invention.
In particular, the boot-strapping technique could be used for eliminating also the effects of the parasitic capacitance external to the detection structure 11 (due, for example, to interconnections) by driving it, instead of with a fixed potential, with the output of the amplification stage 22 (in a way altogether similar to what was described previously for the intrinsic parasitic capacitances CP1, CP2).
The amplification stage 22 may have different circuit configurations; for example, in the case of unitary gain, a level-shifter stage could be used with a pair of PMOS transistors in source-follower configuration.
Moreover, it is clear that the circuit described can be advantageously used in all capacitive MEMS sensors (for example pressure sensors, force sensors, monoaxial accelerometers), the detection structure of which can be modeled with a single variable capacitance.
The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. All of the U.S. patents, U.S. patent application publications, U.S. patent applications, foreign patents, foreign patent applications and non-patent publications referred to in this specification and/or listed in the Application Data Sheet, are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety. Aspects of the embodiments can be modified, if necessary to employ concepts of the various patents, applications and publications to provide yet further embodiments.
These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07425256.0 | Apr 2007 | EP | regional |