The buying and selling of products and services (collectively referred to as “products”) has resulted in a vast array of buying or costing schemes, which are used to select the price at which such products are sold.
One of the most common costing schemes which consumers encounter everyday is known as fixed pricing. According to this costing scheme, sellers set a fixed price for their products based on a past demand for the product and/or anticipated future demand. Buyers desiring to purchase products from the seller are each required to pay the same fixed price regardless of the number of products purchased. If a seller finds that the demand for a given product is greater or less than expected, the seller may later adjust the fixed price of the product to account for such findings. Although the fixed pricing provides a simple way for a seller to conduct business with multiple buyers, one drawback of this costing scheme is that it fails to reward buyers willing to purchase greater quantities of products. Accordingly, the discount quantity pricing scheme evolved.
The discount quantity pricing approach to costing involves pricing a product at different levels depending on the quantity of products a customer is willing to purchase. The more products a customer is willing to purchase, the lower the price. Sellers have incentive to lower price for large quantity buyers since the fixed costs associated with producing the product is spread over more items. Thus, sellers are able to make equal or greater profits despite the lowered price of the product. While volume pricing offers a benefit to larger buyers who are able to purchase large quantities of goods at one time, smaller buyers are often unable to obtain the lowered prices and therefore are more likely to “shop around” for the best available deal. This, in turn, hurts both the buyer and seller. For instance, the smaller buyer is burdened with needing to search for alternative deals and still often ends up paying a higher price than larger buyers. The sellers, on the other hand, are faced with lost business since they are unable to reduce their price for the smaller buyers and still make sufficient profit.
Another common costing scheme for pricing a product is an auction. In an auction, a seller sets an initial price for an item and then multiple buyers are given an opportunity to bid against each other for the product. The buyer having placed the highest bid for the product at the end of the auction purchases the product at the final price bid. In order to provide a larger forum for buyers and sellers, a recent trend has been to auction goods electronically over the Internet. For example, one company known to operate an auction site over the Internet is eBay, Inc. Although auctions provide advantages when selling unique products for which customers are willing to competitively bid, the auction forum is not well suited for sellers desiring to sell large quantities of goods to multiple buyers given the inherent inefficiencies involved with selling one product at a time in a bidding environment.
Yet another costing scheme which has been advanced in recent years is buyer-driven bidding. According to this costing scheme, a single buyer desiring to obtain a product communicates a price at which the buyer is willing to purchase the product to multiple sellers. Each of the sellers is provided an opportunity to review the buyer's price. A sale is complete when one of the sellers agrees to sell the product to the buyer at the price suggested by the buyer. A buyer-driven bidding scheme is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,794,207 assigned to Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership of Stamford, Conn. Another buyer-driven bidding scheme is provided in U.S. Pat. No. 5,897,620 assigned to priceline.com, Inc of Stamford Conn. While the buyer-driven bidding scheme provides advantages for certain types of transactions when, for example, sellers may be willing to sell products at lower than normal prices, the uncertainties involved with whether a buyer's offer will be accepted is often problematic for high volume commercial transactions in which the reliability that a transaction will be complete is of paramount importance.
While the costing schemes described above have various advantages and disadvantages in different situations, a commonality among all of the costing schemes is that each buyer operates independently with one or more sellers to set a purchase price of a product. For example, in the fixed pricing scheme and discount quantity purchasing scheme, buyers individually determine whether the sellers preset price schedule is acceptable regardless of whether other buyers have decided to purchase the product or not. In an auction, not only do buyers operate independent of other buyers, but, in fact, each buyer's decision to place a bid has a negative effect on all other buyers desiring to purchase the same good since the price of the good increases. Similarly, in a buyer-driven bidding scheme, each buyer is completely unaware of the amount other buyers are bidding for a given product.
The independent operations of the buyers stems from a combination of the fact that: 1) the costing schemes discussed above provide little incentive for buyers to work together and 2) there are large inconveniences for buyers to facilitate communication about their buying activities to other buyers. Unfortunately, such independent operation by buyers can result in missed opportunities for both the buyer and seller. For example, in instances where two independent buyers are unable to afford a product, neither buyer informs the seller of their respective desire to purchase the product. Accordingly, sales of the product to these buyers do not take place. Due to the independent operations by each of the buyers, such information is never communicated thereby resulting in missed opportunities for both the buyers and seller alike.
The following presents a simplified summary in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the claimed subject matter. This summary is not an extensive overview. It is not intended to identify key/critical elements or to delineate the scope of the subject invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
In brief, the subject disclosure pertains to systems and methods to facilitate e-commerce transactions and demand aggregation. More particularly, mechanisms are provided to assist interaction with and/or establishment of deal rooms, or electronic forums, for buying and/or selling goods and/or services at volume discount as a function of collective room transactions. Both suppliers and consumers can benefit from such deal rooms in various ways. For example, suppliers can utilize deal rooms for optimal production scheduling and/or inventory reduction, while consumers can be grouped and benefit from bulk discounts that may not otherwise be available to them.
While buyers and/or sellers can host deal rooms, intermediaries can also host deal rooms in accordance with an aspect of the claimed subject matter. According to one aspect of the disclosure, a third-party sponsor or maven hosts a buying group and employs an offer discovery component to discover offers of potential interest to the maven's buying group. After selecting an offer, the maven establishes a deal room to facilitate purchasing between the buying group and the seller making the offer.
In accordance with another aspect of the claimed subject matter, a mechanism is provided to track orders by a buying group in the deal room. A current price or discount amount earned by buyers in the buying group is maintained based upon tracked purchases and a price curve. The price curve can be, among other things, a function of a discount amount based on the total amount purchased under an offer. The price curve can be modified by the maven to provide a sales commission.
According to yet another aspect of this disclosure, a system is provided for management of the buying group. The maven can establish and manage various aspects of the buying group. For example, the maven may add or remove a buyer from the buying group for violating of the terms and conditions of the buying group. The maven may also add or remove sellers available to the buying group.
In accordance with an aspect of the claims, mechanisms are provided to facilitate discovery of buying groups and/or sellers. Geographical relationships among buyers in the buying group may be utilized to locate new sellers that may have an interest in making an offer to the buying group. Further, a buyer can find buying groups to join by supplying a search engine with specified criteria (e.g., type of product and/or service, price, geographical area . . . ).
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, certain illustrative aspects of the claimed subject matter are described herein in connection with the following description and the annexed drawings. These aspects are indicative of various ways in which the subject matter may be practiced, all of which are intended to be within the scope of the claimed subject matter. Other advantages and novel features may become apparent from the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
The subject disclosure pertains to demand aggregation between and amongst a plurality of buyers and sellers. More specifically, the disclosure is related to mechanisms that facilitate hosting of electronic deal rooms including price curves that vary as a function of an amount of product ordered/purchased. In accordance with one embodiment, deal rooms can be hosted by third parties or mavens. These mavens can act as intermediaries between buyers and sellers to promote interaction and commercial transactions between the parties. Such third party activity can be encouraged via monetary incentives, among other things. Various systems and methods are described hereinafter with respect to third party deal room hosting as well as relevant tools to aid such functionality.
Various aspects of the subject disclosure are now described with reference to the annexed drawings, wherein like numerals refer to like or corresponding elements throughout. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description relating thereto are not intended to limit the claimed subject matter to the particular form disclosed. Rather, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter.
Referring initially to
By way of example, a seller can employ the seller interface component 110 to create and present an offer to the deal room component 110. The seller interface component 130 can also notify a seller of orders received under an offer in the deal room component 110. Likewise, the buying group interface component 120 can facilitate receipt or retrieval of an offer from the deal room component 110 and provisioning of orders from buyers in a buying group with respect to a particular offer.
The deal room component 110 also includes an ordering component 220. The ordering component 220 provides a mechanism to initiate and complete an order for goods and/or services under the offer of the deal room. Buyers, via the buying group interface component 120, can elect to purchase goods and/or services presented by the offer presentation component 210. Ordering component 220 is operable to accept orders and communicate the orders to the seller interface component 130 so that it may be provided to the seller for further processing. The ordering component 220 can also notifies buyers that the order was accepted and forwarded to the seller. Additionally, the ordering component 220 is communicatively coupled to a purchase tracking component 240 and the details of the order are provided thereto.
While the ordering component 220 and purchase tracking component 240 are depicted as contained in deal room 110, it is to be appreciated that these components may be distinct from deal room 110. For example, in one embodiment, ordering component 220 can be a checkout register in a store location of the seller. A special coupon code or bar code corresponding to the offer and the buying group is utilized when making a purchase at the store location. The special coupon code or bar code enables the purchase tracking component 240 to link the in-store purchase to the buying group and other purchases made in the deal room and elsewhere. In yet another embodiment, a buyer in the buying group utilizes a credit card when making a purchase at a store location in accordance with the offer. The buyer, when joining the buying group, can supply a credit card number that can be utilized for group buying purchases. When charging a purchase under the offer to a credit card, the seller and the credit card number are matched to the buying group and the offer available to the buying group. Accordingly, the purchase tracking component 240 receives notice of the credit card charge and records the purchase as part of the buying group's group buy under the offer. Thus, while the deal room 110 provides a consolidated means to facilitate purchases and to track purchases, it is to be appreciated that purchases of the buying group can be tracked by any option capable of linking a purchase to the buying group and offer.
The aggregation component 230 receives notifications from the purchase tracking component 240 whenever buyers place orders in the deal room. The aggregation component 230 records the orders of all buyers in the buying group in order to determine a final price or a final discount amount depending on the offer. In one instance, the offer is for specific goods and/or services will include a price curve for the goods and/or services. The price curve is, among other things, a function of a price of a good and/or service based on the total quantity ordered. For example, if the total quantity ordered is 100 units, the unit price may be $10/unit and if the total quantity ordered is 200 units, the unit price may be $8/unit. In another instance, the offer is for any good and/or service of a seller. A discount curve is provided with the offer and is a function of a discount amount based on the total amount purchased. For example, if the buying group purchases goods and/or service totaling $1000, the buying group may receive a 2% discount off the total. If the buying group purchases a total amount of $2000, the group may receive a 4% discount.
The aggregation component 230 populates the recorded orders on a price curve or a discount curve and utilizes such a curve to determine the current price or discount based upon the orders tracked thus far. At the end of the offer period, the aggregation component 230 provides the final price or final discount given to the buying group. It is to be appreciated that movement on the price curve or discount curve can occur in both directions. For example, movement in the forward direction (i.e., towards a lower price and/or greater discount) occurs as the total purchase amount of the buying group increases. However, movement can occur in the reverse direction (i.e., towards a higher price and/or lesser discount) when a purchase product is returned to the seller. Thus, if the purchased product is returned for a refund, the return and refund is reflected by a reduction in the total purchase amount of the buying group and, subsequently, by a change in the final price and/or discount.
Turning now to
The maven 310 establishes an opportunity for commerce between a buying group and a seller. In one instance, the maven 310 can discovers an offer from a seller and/or encourage a seller to join the deal room. Additionally or alternatively, the maven 310 can create and/or manage a buying group. By way of example, the maven 310 can invite potential buyers to join a buying group and benefit from demand aggregation with respect to offers gathered by the maven 310 and established in deal room component 110.
The maven 310 can be incentivized for facilitating interactions between buyers and sellers. For example, a price or discount curve provided with an offer from a seller, for instance, can be modified by maven 310 to include a sales commission to maven 310 as compensation for hosting the deal room component 110. Additionally or alternatively, maven 310 may take a 1% sales commission on all purchases through the deal room component 110. The sales commission can be taken from the discount curve. In other words, a seller may offer a 4% discount if the purchase total is $2000 but the buying group will receive a 3% discount on such a purchase total thus reflecting the sales commission taken by the maven 310.
In one embodiment of the subject disclosure, system 300 includes an auditing component 330 that monitors activity in the deal room 110. Activity in the deal room 110 is monitored so the auditing component 330 can ensure sellers are adhering to discounts detailed in the offers. Thus, sellers can be held accountable for failing to provide the agreed discount to the buying group. While auditing component 330 is depicted as a distinct object, it should be appreciated that the auditing component 330 can be contained in the maven 310, the maven interface component 320 or distributed across both. Alternatively, according to another embodiment, the auditing component 330 can be included in a third-party service distinct from the maven 310, buyers and sellers.
Referring now to
According to one aspect of the subject disclosure, the discovery component 410 can receive a flash offer from a seller available to the maven 310 or otherwise already providing a typical offer to the maven's buying group. As flash offers are only active for a short period of time, the discovery component 410, communicatively coupled to a notification component 430, can immediately inform the buying group of the flash offer.
A deal room for a selected offer can be established by the deal room establishment component 420 (also referred to simply as establishment component 420). The maven utilizing the deal room establishment component 420 creates the terms and conditions of the deal room. A sales commission, if taken, can also be set via the establishment component 420. Once the establishment component 420 launches a deal room, the notification component 430 communicates to the seller and/or a buying group that a new offer is available and in a deal room. The notification component 430 may notify the buyers of the buying group and the seller via a directed communication method such as e-mail, text message, telephone or the like. The notification component 430 may also advertise the new deal room by a posting on a web site or electronic forum. After the creation of the deal room by the deal room establishment component 420, buyers and sellers may interact via the deal room as described supra with reference to
Turning to
It is also to be appreciated that the group management component 510 can facilitate filtering out users of a larger group based on some additional criteria. For example, the group management component 510 can enable a maven to rank buyers in a buying group 520 based upon purchasing histories of individual buyers. In this way, the most active buyers can be determined. A buyer can also be removed from the buying group 520 by the buying group management component 510 if, for example, the buyer violates the terms and conditions of the buying group 520.
System 500 also includes a seller management component 530 that can be employed by a maven to control sellers 540 available thereto. A new seller can be added to the sellers 540 available to the maven. Further, an existing seller may be removed from the sellers 540 for violating terms and conditions or any other reason. The seller management component 530 enables a seller linked to an existing deal room to be switch out with another seller from the available sellers 540 if a more attractive but similar competing offer is discovered in the short term. The seller management component 530 provides statistical measurements such as which sellers 540 are producing the largest sales volumes or which sellers are generating the greatest commission for the maven. The maven can also retrieve histories of sellers 540 that include previous offers, order volumes, discount totals and the like via the seller management component 530.
Mapping component 610 determines geographical relationships among buyers in a buying group that can be utilized to, among other things, locate sellers that may be interested in providing an offer to the buying group. A buyer may complete a buyer registration form including an address when the buyer joins a buying group. The information from the buyer registration form can be stored in buyer profiles 630 of the buyers in the buying group. The mapping component 610 can utilize the stored buyer profiles 630 and make a graph of the buyer locations. The mapping component 610 can integrate with other mapping tools (e.g. MapQuest, Google Maps, Windows Live . . . ) to depict buyer locations on a street map. The mapping component 610 enables a maven to efficiently discern the geographical distribution of buyers in a buying group. The mapping component 610 is communicatively coupled to a seller locator component 620 to facilitate discovery of new sellers, offers, products and services.
Seller locator component 620 utilizes geographical relationships determined by the mapping component 610 to reveal sellers in a geographical area that may be interested in offering specials to the maven's buying group. Seller locator component 620 may search amongst sellers participating in hosted demand aggregation systems hosted by other mavens. Sellers discovered by the seller locator component 620 can be managed by the seller management component 530 described with respect to
In accordance with one embodiment, mapping system 600 operates on an individual buyer level. If a buyer in a buying group subscribes to a membership in the buying group, the mapping component 610 periodically receives data relating to the buyer's location. The mapping component 610 can utilize the seller locator component 620 to find sellers and/or offers base upon and near the buyer's location. The mapping component 610 can ping the buyer's mobile device (e.g., cell phone, PDA, blackberry . . . ) to notify the buyer of the nearby sellers and/or offers. The notification can be a text message, a voicemail message, an e-mail message or the like. Accordingly, the buyer can continuously receive special offers while moving around to different locations.
Referring next to
Search engine 710 includes a query component 712 that is communicatively coupled to the buyer input component 720. Query component 712 receives the query and accesses a database 714 to retrieve matching buying groups and/or offers. Information retrieved from database 714 is conveyed to a presentation component 716. Presentation component 716 processes the information and generates the final search results 730. The presentation component 716 can rank buying groups and/or offers from the query component 712 based upon various criteria. For example, the matching buying groups may be sorted according to current lowest price, lowest potential price, number of members, number of active buyers, or the like. Presentation component 716 may also utilize geographical data to provide a potential buyer with relevant buying groups based upon the potential buyer's location. For example, the potential buyer may desire participating sellers within a particular geographic area. The presentation component 716 will include buying groups with offers from those sellers in the search results 730. Results can also be filtered by the presentation component 716 as a function of a stored profile or other ascertainable information about a potential buyer (e.g., age, ethnicity, marital status, political affiliation, credit score, group memberships . . . ) and/or any other contextual information (e.g., time, date, holiday, event . . . ). In this manner, potential buyers can be married with the most relevant buying groups including, for example, only those in which it would satisfy membership requirements.
Referring to
Maven 310 can establish a variety of relationships among the buying groups and/or sellers. For example, the maven 310 can establish a cross-selling offer between buying groups. Thus, the maven 310 can facilitate commercial transactions not only among sellers and buying groups, but among several buying groups as well. Cross selling transactions amongst buying groups are tracked and recorded similar to buyer/seller transaction described in relation to
According to another aspect of the subject disclosure, buying groups can be combined, split and/or linked. For example, buying groups 820 and 830 can be merged into a single buying group. All the sellers and offers available to either buying group 820 or 830 become available to the merged buying group. A new buying group may be created by splitting or spinning off from an existing buying group. Maven 310 may allow a buyer in a buying group to create a spin-off buying group linked to the parent. For example, buying group 820 can be created and sponsored by maven 310. A buyer in buying group 820 may desire to create a new buying group. Maven 310 can sponsor the buyer and create buying group 830 as a spin-off of buying group 820. The purchase volume from buying groups 820 and 830 are combined or linked to increase overall purchase volume. Sales commissions derived from the buying group purchases can be split between maven 310 and sponsored buyer based upon terms and conditions established prior to spinning off. If allowed by the terms and conditions, buying group 830 can later by unlinked from buying group 820 to become a distinct buying group separate from maven 310.
Referring initially to
The multiple criteria buying scheme calls for a seller 940 to provide a number of deals for a given product, which vary according to different offering criteria defining the limits of a number of selling criteria, such as, for example, price, volume, quality and delivery time. The buyers 930 can enter a range of criteria that the buyer would require for a deal to be made. A list of sellers and prospective deals offered by sellers 940 is generated for the buyers 930 to review. The buyers 930 can then review the list of deals and choose a deal based on the buyers' 930 particular needs. In this manner, the buyers 930 can be certain that particular thresholds have been met.
It is to be appreciated that the present invention has wide applicability to the purchasing and/or selling of a variety of different products and/or services. For example, the present invention may be applied within the context of purchasing and/or selling airline tickets wherein buyers' criteria may include, for example: (1) reputation of airline; (2) reliability; (3) timeliness; (4) price; (5) number of alternative flights; (6) comfort; (7) quality of service; and (8) quality of foods. The sellers' criteria may include, for example: (1) volume of tickets; (2) buyer's versatility in time schedule; (3) buyer's method of payment, etc.
The subject innovation may also be applied in the context of purchasing and/or selling an automobile wherein buyer's criteria may include, for example: (1) reputation of automobile manufacturer; (2) reputation of dealer; (3) price of automobile; (4) delivery options; (5) automobile availability; (6) safety; and (7) financing terms; etc. While, the seller's criteria may include, for example: (1) buyer's creditworthiness; (2) desired finance terms; (3) delivery requests of buyer; (4) delivery dates; etc.
Thus, the subject aspects of the claimed innovation allow buyers and/or sellers of products and/or services to pre-select a plurality of criteria prior to negotiating a deal for the product and/or service. Of course, the pre-selected criteria will vary depending on the particular product and/or service. The scope of the subject invention as defined in the hereto appended claims intends to include any product and/or service (and plurality of pre-selected criteria associated therewith) suitable for deal-making in accordance with the described aspects of the innovation.
Each of the mavens 310, buyers 930 and sellers 940 may access the central server 910 in any of a variety of ways. For example, in the subject embodiment each maven 310, buyer 930 and seller 940 is shown to be part of separate establishments, which include one or more respective computer systems 922 and local servers 926. The computer systems 922 may, for example, be a desktop or laptop computer with a local area network (LAN) interface for communicating over a network backbone 924 to the local server 926. The local servers 926, in turn, interface with the central server 910 via a network cable 950 or the like. It will be appreciated that while the present aspect depicts the computer system 922 communicating with the central server 910 via hardwired network connections. In an alternative aspect, the computer system 922 may interface with the central server 910 using a modem, wireless local area and/or wide area networks, etc. Further, it will be appreciated, that while the mavens 310, buyers 930 and sellers 940 are shown to communicate with the central server 910 via different computer systems 922, it will be appreciated that the mavens 310, buyers 930 and/or sellers 940 may access the central server 910 from the same computer system 922.
The aforementioned systems, architectures, environments and the like have been described with respect to interaction between several components. It should be appreciated that such systems and components can include those components or sub-components specified therein, some of the specified components or sub-components, and/or additional components. Sub-components could also be implemented as components communicatively coupled to other components rather than included within parent components. Further yet, one or more components and/or sub-components may be combined into a single component to provide aggregate functionality. Communication between systems, components and/or sub-components can be accomplished in accordance with either a push and/or pull model. The components may also interact with one or more other components not specifically described herein for the sake of brevity, but known by those of skill in the art.
Furthermore, as will be appreciated, various portions of the disclosed systems and methods may include or consist of artificial intelligence, machine learning, or knowledge or rule based components, sub-components, processes, means, methodologies, or mechanisms (e.g., support vector machines, neural networks, expert systems, Bayesian belief networks, fuzzy logic, data fusion engines, classifiers . . . ). Such components, inter alia, can automate certain mechanisms or processes performed thereby to make portions of the systems and methods more adaptive as well as efficient and intelligent. By way of example and not limitation, the offer discovery component 410 can employ such mechanisms to intelligently locate relevant offers. Likewise, the group management component 510 can employ similar mechanism to identify/filter group buy members, for example by mining user profile data.
In view of the exemplary systems described supra, methodologies and means that may be implemented in accordance with the disclosed subject matter will be better appreciated with reference to
Turning now to
In accordance with embodiment, web page 1000 can be generated and/or utilized by an affiliate distinct from the maven. The affiliate advertises the maven's buying groups and/or group buy events on behalf of the maven. If potential buyers utilizing links 1020 and 1040 on the affliate's website ultimately become members of buying groups, the affliate's website is recorded as a referring website as part of a member profile. The affiliate receives a commission or other compensation based upon the number of referrals or other such metric. For example, the maven pays a flat rate for each new member that joined via the affliate's website. In another embodiment, the affiliate receives a percentage of the maven's commission on the purchases made by members referred by the affiliate.
Referring now to
If at 1102, a potential buyer has already registered, the buyer may login as a registered user by entering a user name and pass code when prompted at 1114. Upon entry of such information, the user name and password is verified at 1116 with the information in the database at 1110. If the user name and pass code entered by the buyer does not match any entry in the database, the buyer returns to 1114 for re-entry of a user name and pass code. If, however, at 1116, a valid user name and pass code are entered, group offers available to the buying group are displayed at 1118.
Referring now to
In one embodiment, hyperlink 1320 is provided to allow buyer access to a community forum. The community forum enables buyers, mavens and sellers to interact amongst one another. These interactions can take the form of blogs, e-mails, bulletin boards and the like. To facilitate interaction, each buyer has a buyer card 1350. Buyer card 1350 includes an avatar, a user name and a buyer status identifier. The avatar is a symbol or graphical representation of the buyer. The avatar facilitates interactions in the community forum by providing a visual representation of buyers. The user name is the user name supplied during registration as described with reference to
Turning now to
Turning now to
Referring to
Input screen 1700 also displays the total amount purchased to date by members of the buying group. In addition, the total amount received in discounts under a price or discount curve is also displayed. The maven may utilize the input screen 1700 to view the best selling products, the top buyers making the most purchases or top sellers with the largest sales volume.
Turning now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Turning now to
For purposes of brevity and clarity, discussion of additional aspects of deal rooms and demand aggregation (e.g., setup, interaction . . . ) has not been explicitly reproduced herein. For additional detail, regarding such subject matter see the additional patent applications incorporated herein by reference.
As used herein, the terms “component,” “system” and the like are intended to refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution. For example, a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an instance, an executable, a thread of execution, a program and/or a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a computer and the computer can be a component. One or more components may reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component may be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers.
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean serving as an example, instance or illustration. Any aspect or design described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects or designs. Furthermore, examples are provided solely for purposes of clarity and understanding and are not meant to limit the subject innovation or relevant portion thereof in any manner. It is to be appreciated that a myriad of additional or alternate examples could have been presented, but have been omitted for purposes of brevity.
Furthermore, all or portions of the subject innovation may be implemented as a method, apparatus or article of manufacture using standard programming and/or engineering techniques to produce software, firmware, hardware, or any combination thereof to control a computer to implement the disclosed innovation. The term “article of manufacture” as used herein is intended to encompass a computer program accessible from any computer-readable device or media. For example, computer readable media can include but are not limited to magnetic storage devices (e.g., hard disk, floppy disk, magnetic strips . . . ), optical disks (e.g., compact disk (CD), digital versatile disk (DVD) . . . ), smart cards, and flash memory devices (e.g., card, stick, key drive . . . ). Additionally it should be appreciated that a carrier wave can be employed to carry computer-readable electronic data such as those used in transmitting and receiving electronic mail or in accessing a network such as the Internet or a local area network (LAN). Of course, those skilled in the art will recognize many modifications may be made to this configuration without departing from the scope or spirit of the claimed subject matter.
In order to provide a context for the various aspects of the disclosed subject matter,
With reference to
The system memory 2216 includes volatile and nonvolatile memory. The basic input/output system (BIOS), including the basic routines to transfer information between elements within the computer 2212, such as during start-up, is stored in nonvolatile memory. By way of illustration, and not limitation, nonvolatile memory can include read only memory (ROM). Volatile memory includes random access memory (RAM), which can act as external cache memory to facilitate processing.
Computer 2212 also includes removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media.
The computer 2212 also includes one or more interface components 2226 that are communicatively coupled to the bus 2218 and facilitate interaction with the computer 2212. By way of example, the interface component 2226 can be a port (e.g., serial, parallel, PCMCIA, USB, FireWire . . . ) or an interface card (e.g., sound, video, network . . . ) or the like. The interface component 2226 can receive input and provide output (wired or wirelessly). For instance, input can be received from devices including but not limited to, a pointing device such as a mouse, trackball, stylus, touch pad, keyboard, microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, camera, other computer and the like. Output can also be supplied by the computer 2212 to output device(s) via interface component 2226. Output devices can include displays (e.g., CRT, LCD, plasma . . . ), speakers, printers and other computers, among other things.
The system 2300 includes a communication framework 2350 that can be employed to facilitate communications between the client(s) 2310 and the server(s) 2330. Here, the client(s) can correspond to buyer and/or maven computing devices and the server(s) can provide the functionality with respect to maintaining deal rooms and demand aggregation, as previously described. The client(s) 2310 are operatively connected to one or more client data store(s) 2360 that can be employed to store information local to the client(s) 2310. Similarly, the server(s) 2330 are operatively connected to one or more server data store(s) 2340 that can be employed to store information local to the servers 2330. By way of example, a user (e.g., buyer, seller, maven . . . ) can login to one or more servers 2330 via a client 2310 to facilitate interaction with deal room/demand aggregation data persisted to data store(s) 2340.
What has been described above includes examples of aspects of the claimed subject matter. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the claimed subject matter, but one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the disclosed subject matter are possible. Accordingly, the disclosed subject matter is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “includes,” “has” or “having” or variations in form thereof are used in either the detailed description or the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as “comprising” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/618,412, filed Dec. 29, 2006 and entitled HOSTED DEMAND AGGREGATION, which: (1) is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Pat. No. 7,689,469, filed Aug. 14, 2006 and entitled E-COMMERCE VOLUME PRICING, which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 7,124,099, filed on Feb. 20, 2003 and entitled E-COMMERCE VOLUME PRICING, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/324,391, filed Jun. 3, 1999 and entitled E-COMMERCE VOLUME PRICING, now abandoned, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/133,769, filed May 12, 1999 and entitled E-COMMERCE VOLUME PRICING; (2) is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Pat. No. 7,747,473, filed Nov. 3, 2006 and entitled DEMAND AGGREGATION SYSTEM, which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 7,181,419, filed on Sep. 13, 2002 and entitled DEMAND AGGREGATION SYSTEM, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/318,789 filed on Sep. 13, 2001; (3) is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/922,884, entitled E-COMMERCE VOLUME PRICING filed on Aug. 6, 2001, which: (A) is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/324,391, entitled E-COMMERCE VOLUME PRICING filed on Jun. 3, 1999, which claims priority to U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/133,769, filed May 12, 1999, and entitled E-COMMERCE VOLUME PRICING; (B) is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Pat. No. 7,818,212, filed Oct. 22, 1999 and entitled MULTIPLE CRITERIA BUYING AND SELLING MODEL; (C) is a continuation-in-part of P.C.T. Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US00/11989, filed May 3, 2000, and entitled MULTIPLE CRITERIA BUYING AND SELLING MODEL, AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING OPEN OFFER SHEETS, which claims priority to: U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/137,583, filed Jun. 4, 1999, and entitled E-COMMERCE AUTOMATED SELLER SELECTION SYSTEM; U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/138,209, filed Jun. 9, 1999, and entitled SECURITIZATION OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE; U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/139,338, filed Jun. 16, 1999, and entitled REAL-TIME OPTIMIZED BUYING BLOCK; U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/139,518, filed Jun. 16, 1999, and entitled REAL-TIME MARKET PURCHASING; U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/139,519, filed Jun. 16, 1999, and entitled E-COMMERCE PURCHASING CARD; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/342,345, filed Jun. 29, 1999, and entitled CREDIT BASED TRANSACTION SYSTEM AND METHODOLOGY; U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/142,371, filed Jul. 6, 1999, and entitled TIME VALUE OF MONEY BASED CREDIT CARD FOR MERCHANT; U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/160,510, filed Oct. 20, 1999, and entitled MULTIPLE CRITERIA BUYING AND SELLING MODEL, AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING OPEN OFFER SHEETS; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/426,063, filed Oct. 22, 1999, and entitled MULTIPLE CRITERIA BUYING AND SELLING MODEL; U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/162,182, filed Oct. 28, 1999, and entitled MULTIPLE CRITERIA BUYING AND SELLING MODEL, AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING OPEN OFFER SHEETS; and U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/173,409, filed Dec. 28, 1999, and entitled MULTIPLE CRITERIA BUYING AND SELLING MODEL, AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING OPEN OFFER SHEETS; and (D) claims priority to U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/237,474, filed Oct. 2, 2000, and entitled MULTIPLE CRITERIA BUYING AND SELLING MODEL, AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING OPEN OFFER SHEETS. The entireties of all prior-filed applications listed herein are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4789928 | Fujisaki | Dec 1988 | A |
4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4887207 | Natarajan | Dec 1989 | A |
4947028 | Gorog | Aug 1990 | A |
4992940 | Dworkin | Feb 1991 | A |
5053956 | Donald et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5053957 | Suzuki | Oct 1991 | A |
5063506 | Brockwell et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5402336 | Spiegelhoff et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5414838 | Kolton et al. | May 1995 | A |
5444630 | Dlugos | Aug 1995 | A |
5564115 | Clarkson | Oct 1996 | A |
5592375 | Salmon et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5615109 | Eder | Mar 1997 | A |
5623660 | Josephson | Apr 1997 | A |
5664115 | Fraser | Sep 1997 | A |
5689652 | Lupien et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5710887 | Chelliah et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5717989 | Tozzoli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5732400 | Mandler et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734890 | Case et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5794207 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797127 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799285 | Klingman | Aug 1998 | A |
5822736 | Hartman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826244 | Huberman | Oct 1998 | A |
5835896 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837071 | Andersson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842178 | Giovannoli | Nov 1998 | A |
5845265 | Woolston | Dec 1998 | A |
5850442 | Muftic | Dec 1998 | A |
5855008 | Goldhaber et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870721 | Norris | Feb 1999 | A |
5878400 | Carter, III | Mar 1999 | A |
5884271 | Pitroda | Mar 1999 | A |
5890138 | Godin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897620 | Walker et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903830 | Joao et al. | May 1999 | A |
5923741 | Wright et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933817 | Hucal | Aug 1999 | A |
5940807 | Purcell | Aug 1999 | A |
5945653 | Walker et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950172 | Klingman | Sep 1999 | A |
5960411 | Hartman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966697 | Fergerson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970478 | Walker et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974396 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974406 | Bisdikian et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987434 | Libman | Nov 1999 | A |
5995943 | Bull et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999915 | Nahan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014638 | Burge et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016484 | Williams et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026383 | Ausubel | Feb 2000 | A |
6032136 | Brake et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035289 | Chou et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6052670 | Johnson | Apr 2000 | A |
6055519 | Kennedy et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055573 | Gardenswartz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064981 | Barni et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078906 | Huberman | Jun 2000 | A |
6101484 | Halbert et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108632 | Reeder et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108639 | Walker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112185 | Walker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112189 | Rickard et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6131087 | Luke et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141653 | Conklin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151588 | Tozzoli et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154738 | Call | Nov 2000 | A |
6167383 | Henson | Dec 2000 | A |
6195646 | Grosh et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6219653 | O'Neill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233566 | Levine et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236972 | Shkedy | May 2001 | B1 |
6236977 | Verba et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236978 | Tuzhilin | May 2001 | B1 |
6249772 | Walker et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253189 | Feezell et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260019 | Courts | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260024 | Shkedy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266651 | Woolston | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269343 | Pallakoff | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289348 | Richard et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6323894 | Katz | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327574 | Kramer et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332127 | Bandera et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332135 | Conklin et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336105 | Conklin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338050 | Conklin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6360205 | Iyengar et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6397208 | Lee | May 2002 | B1 |
6415270 | Rackson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418415 | Walker et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418441 | Call | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6449601 | Friedland et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450407 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456986 | Boardman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466919 | Walker et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496568 | Nelson | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505046 | Baker | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507279 | Loof | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6510434 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519571 | Guheen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535856 | Tal | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553346 | Walker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553350 | Carter | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560501 | Walser et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6578014 | Murcko, Jr. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584451 | Shoham et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587835 | Treyz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598026 | Ojha et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601043 | Purcell | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604089 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606603 | Joseph et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606607 | Martin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607136 | Atsmon et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6631356 | Van Horn et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647257 | Owensby | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6647373 | Carlton-Foss | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658093 | Langseth et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6662194 | Joao et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6705520 | Pitroda et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6716101 | Meadows et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6754636 | Walker et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6769607 | Pitroda et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778968 | Gulati | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6782370 | Stack | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785661 | Mandler et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6839690 | Foth et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847938 | Moore | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847965 | Walker et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850907 | Lutnick et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6868392 | Ogasawara | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6871140 | Florance et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6871190 | Seymour et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876974 | Marsh et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6876977 | Marks | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6876982 | Lancaster | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6876983 | Goddard | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6877655 | Robertson et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6877665 | Challa et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6915275 | Banerjee et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922674 | Nelson | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6925446 | Watanabe | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6928416 | Bertash | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934690 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6952219 | Lee | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954734 | Kuelbs et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6985879 | Walker et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990467 | Kwan | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6992794 | Keane et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7013285 | Rebane | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7013286 | Aggarwal et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7016865 | Weber et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7035820 | Goodwin et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039603 | Walker et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7047206 | Schultze | May 2006 | B1 |
7062452 | Lotvin et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7065494 | Evans | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7069228 | Rose et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7072849 | Filepp et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7072853 | Shkedi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076447 | Peyser et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7080030 | Eglen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082408 | Baumann et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7103565 | Vaid | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7103567 | Smukowski | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7107225 | McClung, III | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7107226 | Cassidy et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7120592 | Lewis | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7124099 | Mesaros | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124107 | Pishevar et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7133835 | Fusz et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143057 | Kuelbs et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146330 | Alon et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7165045 | Kim-E | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7181419 | Mesaros | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7194427 | Van Horn et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7194442 | Flanagan et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7213754 | Eglen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7236575 | Kim et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7240021 | Walker et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7243082 | Forlai | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7254833 | Cornelius et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7263498 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7263505 | Forlai | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7296001 | Ephrati et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7330826 | Porat et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7343317 | Jokinen et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349890 | Pathak et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7363246 | Van Horn et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7364086 | Mesaros | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7376613 | Cofino et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7379899 | Junger | May 2008 | B1 |
7415428 | Garwood | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415617 | Ginter et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7433832 | Bezos et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7464051 | Heggem | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7467103 | Murray et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7475024 | Phan | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7480627 | Van Horn et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7496543 | Bamford et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7516089 | Walker et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7523045 | Walker et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7539742 | Spector | May 2009 | B2 |
7542927 | Mukai | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552069 | Kepecs | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7577582 | Ojha et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7584146 | Duhon | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7593871 | Mesaros | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7596509 | Bryson | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7599857 | Bishop et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606731 | McClung, III | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7624044 | Wren | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7630919 | Obrecht | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7636672 | Angles et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7672870 | Haines et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680696 | Murray | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7689463 | Mesaros | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7689468 | Walker et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689469 | Mesaros | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7693748 | Mesaros | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7698173 | Burge et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7698208 | Hirani et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698240 | Chatterjee et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7706838 | Atsmon et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7725350 | Schlee | May 2010 | B2 |
7729977 | Xiao et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747473 | Mesaros | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7792699 | Kwei | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7801803 | Forlai | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7813955 | Ariff et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7814106 | Guido et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7814114 | Mi et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815114 | Mesaros | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7818212 | Mesaros | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7860776 | Chin et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7890373 | Junger | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7899707 | Mesaros | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7912761 | Vaid | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917386 | Christensen | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917416 | Quinn et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7937288 | Blaser et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7942316 | Bennett et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7953730 | Bleckner et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7958007 | Urbanski et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8005747 | Forlai | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8015583 | Bates et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8024226 | Fusz et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8032409 | Mikurak | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8032422 | Pickard et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8036941 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8073762 | Sheth et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8104682 | Junger | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8140402 | Mesaros | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8140405 | Mesaros | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140442 | Heyer | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140615 | Miller et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8150735 | Walker et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160931 | Mesaros | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8171561 | Moskowitz et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8196811 | Mesaros | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8209226 | Cheney et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8219460 | Mesaros | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8249942 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8271327 | Walker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271332 | Mesaros | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8285598 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8285600 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290824 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8306870 | Mesaros | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8311896 | Mesaros | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8341033 | Porat et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8341035 | Mesaros | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8401918 | Mesaros | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8438075 | Mesaros | May 2013 | B2 |
8473353 | Matsuda et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8489466 | Van Horn et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8494914 | Mesaros | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8494915 | Mesaros | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8533002 | Mesaros | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8567672 | Mesaros | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8573492 | Mesaros | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8584940 | Mesaros | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8589247 | Mesaros | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8590785 | Mesaros | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8616449 | Mesaros | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8620765 | Mesaros | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8626605 | Mesaros | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8635108 | Mesaros | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20010011247 | O'Flaherty et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010011264 | Kawasaki | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010014868 | Herz et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010018660 | Sehr | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010039514 | Barenbaum et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044751 | Pugliese, III et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047296 | Wyker | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047311 | Singh | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020004765 | Han et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007324 | Centner et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026351 | Coleman | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032573 | Williams et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035536 | Gellman | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020040352 | McCormick | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046105 | Gardenswartz et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046147 | Livesay et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052782 | Landesmann | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065762 | Lee et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065769 | Irribarren et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069079 | Vega | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080950 | Koko et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082881 | Price et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091580 | Wang | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099643 | Abeshouse et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103741 | Boies et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107773 | Abdou | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116282 | Martin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143692 | Heimermann et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147670 | Lange | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165771 | Walker et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020165821 | Tree | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169703 | Lutnick et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169759 | Kraft et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174000 | Katz et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174051 | Wise | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178077 | Katz et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188508 | Lee et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004802 | Callegari | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004808 | Elhaoussine et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004823 | Sagy | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028473 | Eso et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041002 | Hao et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055774 | Ginsberg | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030088494 | Lee | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093355 | Issa | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109949 | Ikeda | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030111531 | Williams et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115100 | Teicher | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126040 | Mesaros | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126250 | Jhanji | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149619 | Stanley et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167222 | Mehrotra et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030195832 | Cao et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200150 | Westcott et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208412 | Hillestad et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216960 | Postrel | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233276 | Pearlman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233557 | Zimmerman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040015415 | Cofino et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019494 | Ridgeway et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019646 | Zweben et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039661 | Fuzell-Casey et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039677 | Mura et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040093276 | Nishio | May 2004 | A1 |
20040128197 | Bam et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153431 | Bhogal et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172372 | Wells et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215467 | Coffman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215500 | Monahan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050021400 | Postrel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021401 | Postrel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038713 | Pickard et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050149458 | Eglen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171918 | Eden et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197857 | Avery | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216337 | Roberts et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050272442 | Miller et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273415 | Mathews et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288954 | McCarthy et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060036491 | Leung et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060059062 | Wood et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069619 | Walker et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060095327 | Vaughn et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095366 | Sheth et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106678 | Walker et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129454 | Moon et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143080 | Garg et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155598 | Spurr et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178918 | Mikurak | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190379 | Maas et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060259421 | Maass | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070150349 | Handel et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070206584 | Fulling et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070212938 | Shin | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220169 | Silver et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080015711 | Charland et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080052189 | Walker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052750 | Grunnet-Jepsen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071634 | Rampell et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082418 | Fordyce et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080126201 | Ullah | May 2008 | A1 |
20080146204 | Gu et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147534 | Ephrati et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080249846 | Yonemoto et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255886 | Unkefer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090055328 | Bamford et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090059856 | Kermoal et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083136 | Blackwood | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089177 | Dayton et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090150218 | Brunner et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090187455 | Fernandes et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198622 | Temte et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090276305 | Clopp | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090307073 | MirrokniBanadaki et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319359 | Soza et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327034 | Petersen | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327038 | Petersen | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327101 | Sayed | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327140 | Kuo | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100088174 | Cohagan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100125525 | Inamdar | May 2010 | A1 |
20100169161 | Sacco | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110004515 | Mesaros | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110016010 | Mesaros | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110040624 | Jhanji | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110125592 | Mesaros | May 2011 | A1 |
20110213648 | Mesaros | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213649 | Mesaros | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213650 | Mesaros | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238476 | Carr et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246271 | Mesaros | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246274 | Mesaros | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264499 | Abendroth et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270699 | Mesaros | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110270700 | Mesaros | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120022970 | Mesaros | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120029993 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120029995 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035999 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036000 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036031 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041811 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120054012 | Mesaros | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120158475 | Mesaros | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158479 | Raisch | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179526 | Mesaros | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179530 | Mesaros | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197705 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197722 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203603 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203611 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203615 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209683 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209737 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209738 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209739 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209740 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209743 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226541 | Mesaros | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245993 | Mesaros | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120253912 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120253977 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265590 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265600 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120278157 | Mesaros | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284110 | Mesaros | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290395 | Mesaros | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120310738 | Mesaros | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006741 | Mesaros | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013385 | Mesaros | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013388 | Mesaros | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130080282 | Mesaros | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130117086 | Mesaros | May 2013 | A1 |
20130246122 | Mesaros | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246223 | Mesaros | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130275253 | Mesaros | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11-184910 | Jul 1999 | JP |
WO 9821713 | May 1998 | WO |
WO-0050970 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0070424 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 2008083371 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Garner, K., “Culture Vulture: up from under—Germaine Greer,” Off Our Backs, Jun. 24, 1971, vol. 1, Iss. 23, p. 14. |
Groupon, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringment dated Oct. 17, 2011. |
Groupon, Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief dated Jul. 5, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/517,528 Office Action mailed Dec. 6, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/794,721 Office Action Sep. 10, 2013. |
“Excite@Home Standardizes on Siebel eBusiness; Leading Broadband Media Company Relies on Siebel Systems to Manage Customer Relationships Across Its Entire Family of Services,” Business Wire, Jan. 19, 2000. |
“Global Real Estate Markets Spell Opportunity, Experts Tell Realtors,” PR Newswire, Nov. 21, 1991. |
“Lucent Launches On-Line Catalog” M2 Presswire, Jan. 22, 1999. |
“Screen Savers,” Lawyer, Feb. 19, 2001. |
“The Oil and Gas Asset Clearinghouse, a Pertoleum Place Company, to Host It's Second Exclusively Online Auction of Oil and Gas Properties on Aug. 14-16, 2000.” PR Newswire, p. 5591, Aug. 3, 2000, 2 pages. |
Amazon.com, “Help/Shipping”, Archived on Feb. 2, 2003 by www.archive.org. Last accessed Mar. 19, 2008, 9 pages. |
Ashton Technology Group, Inc. Announces NASDAQ National Market System Listing; Enters into Clearing Arrangements with 8 National Brokerage Firms, Business Wire, Jan. 3, 2000. http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi—mOEIN/is—2000—Jan—3/ai—58429780/print. Last accessed Apr. 8, 2009, 3 pages. |
Beaty. Mass Customisation. Manufacturing Engineer, vol. 75, issue 5, Oct. 1996, pp. 217-220. |
Blyth, et al. Merchandising System Collecting Data. Derwent Information Ltd. Last accessed Jan. 20, 2009, 2 pages. |
Breyer. “Bargains in Cyberspace,” National Home Center News, vol. 26, No. 21, p. 21, Nov. 20, 2000. |
Business Editors and High Tech Writers, “eWinWin Announces the Release of DAS 3.0, the Next Generation of B2B Demand Aggregation Solutions” Dec. 28, 2000, Businee wire, p. 1 (4 pages). |
Business Editors. “Weatherchem Announces Major eCommerce Success with eWinWin”, Aug. 9, 2001, Business Wire, (p. 1) 2 pages. |
CBOT, “Trading in Futures Can Provide Considerable Financial Rewards”, Last accessed Mar. 19, 2008, 41 pages. |
Chicago Board of Trade, “Knowledge Center,” as archived by Archive.org, on Feb. 13, 2003. |
China—Welcome to the Machine: New Machinery, Electronics B-to-B Website Launched. China Online, Jul. 24, 2000, 1 page. |
Computer Geeks Discount Outlet, “Order Status,” Mar. 1, 2002. |
Deierlein. “Smart Fuel Buying,” Fleet Equipment, vol. 24, No. 8, pp. 42-44, Aug. 1998. |
Dibiase. The Inventory Simulator: A Micro Computer Based Inventory Model. Modeling and Simulation on Microcomputers, Paul F. Hogan, ed., Society for Computer Simulation (SCS), La Jolla, pp. 104-106, Jan. 1987. |
DomainTradeLlVE! Launched by solutionhome.com. Business Wire, Oct. 20, 1999, 1 page. |
Easley, et al. Time and the Process of Security Price Adjustment, Journal of Finance, vol. 47, No. 2, Jun. 1992. http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jfinan/v47y1992i2p576-605.html. Last accessed Sep. 10, 2009, 30 pages. |
Edwards. “Increase Your Bottom Line : Automated Customer Service and Marketing,” E-Business Advisor, vol. 17, No. 7, p. 30, Jul. 1999. |
Enos. Vying to be the Top Dog. Upside vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 160-165, Mar. 2000. |
eWinWin, “eCommerce Redefined : The Positive Impact of eWinWin's Demand Aggregation System on the Manufacturing Supply Chain”, Oct. 2000. Last accessed Mar. 19, 2008, 11 pages. |
Gaonkar, et al. Strategic Sourcing and Collaborative Planning in Internet Enabled Supply Chain Networks Producing Multigeneration Products. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 2, issue 1, Jan. 2005, pp. 54-66. |
Gurley. Creating a Great E-Commerce Business. Fortune, Mar. 16, 1998. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US 07/89195, mailed May 12, 2008, 8 pages. |
Jonsson, et al. Impact of Processing and Queueing Times on Order Quantities. Mater. Flow, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 221-230, Aug. 1985. [in related U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,884 on May 7, 2004]. |
Kantrow, American Express Sets a Three-Tier Pricing on Optima, Dialog: File 148 #05812190 (The Gale Group), American Banker, v157, n25, p1(2), Feb. 6, 1992. |
Koenig, et al. Quantitative Industrial Ecology. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, Issue 1, Feb. 1998, pp. 16-28. |
Lamparter. “Natural Selection.” American Printer, vol. 217, No. 3, pp. 54-64, Jun. 1996. |
Magna Cash Cybersource Partner to Expand Online Payment Options. PR Newswire, New York, Jan. 15. |
Market Engineering Research for Structural Impacts of e-Business in the European Chemicals Industry (Ch. 3), Structural Impact of e-Business on the Chemicals Industry, Frost & Sullivan, Market Research Report, Jun. 2001. |
Maxwell, Pricing education in the United States of America: responding to the needs of business, The Journal of Product & Brand Management, Santa Barbara, Aug. 1998, vol. 7, Issue 4, p. 336-341. |
Medrano, et al. Strategic Behaviour and Price Discovery, RAND Journal of Economics, vo1. 32, No. 2, Jun. 21, 2001. https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/rje—online.cgi?action=view&year=2001&issue=sum&page=221&&tid=83197&sc=uogfbloa. Last accessed Sep. 3, 2009, 29 pages. |
Meriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition, 1997, p. 732. |
Meridex Introduces Advanced Features to its B2B Network, PR Newswire, May 25, 2000. Available online: http://www.canadait.com/cfm/index.cfm?It=106&Id=3421&Se=355&Sv=Company&Lo=441. Last accessed Apr. 30, 2009, 3 pages. |
Mesaros. Innovation in Difficult Times : How US Manufacturers are Using Demand Aggregation to Increase Sales and Lower Costs. Jul. 26, 2001. Last accessed Mar. 19, 2008, 4 pages. |
MobShop Launches New Rev of Selling App, Online Reporter, May 28, 2001. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi—hb5932/is—200105/ai—n23884526/. Last accessed Apr. 30, 2009, 2 pages. |
MobShop Selected by WHN(TM) (WhatsHotNow.com (R), Inc.) to Power Demand Aggregation Within Its Licensed Merchandise Marketplace; Demand Aggregation Technology Enables Marketplaces to Improve Liquidity by Generating Volume Transactions, PR Newswire, San Francisco, Jan. 16, 2001. Alternative—http://www.allbusiness.com/retail-trade/4291613-1.html. |
Moody. From E-Commerce to We-Commerce. Computer Weekly, 42, Jun. 3, 1999. Last accessed Apr. 9, 2009, 2 pages. |
Mullich. Altrade Serves as a Natural Resource—A Head Start and Big Trading Volume Give the Natural Gas Marketplace a Competitive Edge. Can it Last? Information Week, 152, Jun. 12, 2000, 3 pages. |
Myers. “E-Solutions for Surplus Inventory,” Dsn Retailing Today, vol. 39, No. 21, p. 13, Nov. 6, 2000. |
Nellore, et al. Factors Influencing Success in Integrated Product Development (IPD) Projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 48, issue 2, May 2001, pp. 164-174. |
OA dated Feb. 23, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/426,063, 11 pages. |
OA dated Mar. 19, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/152,462, 26 pages. |
OA dated Apr. 29, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/464,585, 19 pages. |
OA dated Jul. 2, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/426,063, 24 pages. |
OA dated Sep. 9, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/556,604, 60 pages. |
OA dated Oct. 6, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/042,051, 53 pages. |
OA dated Oct. 28, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/464,585, 37 pages. |
OA dated Nov. 27, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,431, 43 pages. |
OA dated Apr. 16, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/042,051, 32 pages. |
OA dated Apr. 29, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/464,585, 16 pages. |
OA Dated Apr. 10, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/351,069, 27 pages. |
OA Dated Apr. 6, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,431, 33 pages. |
OA Dated Feb. 6, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/626,296, 11 pages. |
OA Dated Mar. 25, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/556,604, 59 pages. |
OA Dated Nov. 3, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/150,920, 161 pages. |
OA Dated Oct. 20, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/464,585, 11 pages. |
OA Dated Oct. 27, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/464,376, 13 pages. |
OA Dated Oct. 29, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/152,462, 27 pages. |
O'Gorman, et al. Considerations for Connecting Renewable Generation into Bulk Supply Networks. Sixth International Conference on Advances in Power System Control, Operation and Management, ASDCOM 2003, vol. 2, Nov. 11-14, pp. 674-680. Last accessed Sep. 10, 2009, 7 pages. |
Rahim, et al. Optimal Decision Rules for Determining the Length of Production Run, (Abstract Only), Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 195-202, 1985. |
Rahim, et al. “Optimal Production Run for a Process with Random Linear Drift,” (Abstract only), Omega, vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 347-351, 1988. |
Scott. Chains of Trust, Supply Chain Management, Manufacturing Engineer, vol. 75, issue 4, Aug. 1996, pp. 172-174. |
Scott. Supply Partnerships in the Aerospace Industry. Transforming Your Material Flow: A Practical Insight Into World Class Logistics and Supply Chain Management IEE Colloquium on, Oct. 24, 1996, pp. 3/1-3/3. |
Scott. Supply Partnerships and the Effective Management of Low Cost Components. Transforming Your Material Flow: A Practical Insight Into World Class Logistics and Supply Chain Management IEE Colloquium on, Mar. 19, 1996, pp. 2/1-2/4. |
Sivakumar, et al. Price Match Guarantees: Rationale, Implementation, and Consumer Response. Pricing Strategy and Practice, Bradford, 1996, vol. 4, issue 4, 11 pgs. Recovered from ProQuest Database Aug. 25, 2006. |
Sjostrom. Price Discrimination by Shipping Conferences. Logistics and Transportation Review, Jun. 1992, [from Dialog® File 15, acc. No. 00727777 93-76998]. |
Stacklin. “Bridgestone Printing Unit Teams with ewinwin”, Mar. 25, 2002, Crain's Cleveland Business, vol. 23, issue 12, 3 pages. |
Tanaka. “As Other Companies Crumble, Ecount Carves Out Niche in Online-Payment Services.” Knight Rider Tribune News Service, Washington, Feb. 27, 2002. (Recovered from ProQuest Database Dec. 4, 2006.). |
Thomas, et al. JIT: Strategies for Distant Suppliers (Abstract). Business, vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 36-39, Dec. 1990. |
Watson. The Effects of Demand Forecast Fluctuations on Customer Service and Inventory Cost When Demand is Lumpy. Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 75-82, Jan. 1987. http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v38/n1/abs/jors19879a.html. Last accessed Sep. 10, 2009, 8 pages. |
Wayback Machine. “Searched for http://www.ewinwin.com/corp/ewinwinwhitepaper.pdf”, Oct. 2, 2008, Archive.org. |
Yeh, et al. “Optimal Production Run Length for Products Sold with Warranty,” (Abstract only), European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 120, No. 3, pp. 575-582, Feb. 1, 2000. |
“Supplier pricing and lot sizing when demand is price sensitive”. Abad, P.L. Fac. of Bus., McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ont., Canada. European Journal of Operational Research , vol. 78, No. 3, p. 334-54. Date: Nov. 10, 1994 [recovered from Dialog on Oct. 20, 2009]. 1 page. |
Efficient bid pricing based on costing methods for Internet bid systems Sung Eun Park; Yong Kyu Lee. Dept. of Comput. Eng., Dongguk Univ., South Korea. Book Title: Web Information Systems-WISE 2006. 7th International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 42) [recovered from Dialog on ]. 1 page. |
Advisory Action Dated Apr. 29, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,431. |
OA dated Sep. 17, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,412, 97 pages. |
Mack, Going Local. © 2006 ProQuest Info&Learning. Last accessed Sep. 17, 2010, 2 pages. |
De Gheest, Computer Implemented Electronic Bidding for Electronic Sales Application. Derwent Acc No. 2001-006585, © 2010 Derwent Information Ltd. Last accessed Sep. 17, 2010, 2 pages. |
Swartz, Wireless Ads: Loved/Loathed. Wireless Review. © 2006 The Gale Group. Last accessed Sep. 17, 2010, 3 pages. |
OA dated Sep. 30, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,418, 125 pages. |
OA dated Aug. 4, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,415, 65 pages. |
OA dated Oct. 21, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/788,513, 62 pages. |
OA mailed Mar. 21, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/887,778, 38 pages. |
OA mailed Feb. 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,431, 33 pages. |
OA mailed Jan. 24, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,415, 24 pages. |
OA mailed Feb. 23, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,412, 27 pages. |
OA mailed Mar. 28, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,418, 22 pages. |
OA mailed Jan. 21, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/881,923, 48 pages. |
OA dated Apr. 6, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/788,513, 38 pages. |
OA dated Aug. 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/881,923, 32 pages. |
OA dated Aug. 2, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,415, 27 pages. |
OA dated Jul. 28, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/704,280, 55 pages. |
OA dated Sep. 12, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,884, 31 pages. |
OA dated Sep. 2, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,431, 24 pages. |
OA dated Sep. 21, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,622, 52 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/271,464 Office Action mailed May 10, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,884 Office Action mailed May 1, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,723 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 8, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/270,133 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 12, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,971 Office Action mailed Jun. 14, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,144 Office Action mailed May 16, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,415 Final Office Action mailed May 2, 2012. |
Amazon.com, “Earths Biggest Selection,” Jun. 30, 2001, archived by Archive.org: http://web.archive.org/web/20010630130618/http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/subst/home/home.html. |
Anon., “ELCOM: Virgin Trains Cuts Procurement Costs with elcom.com; New Electronic Ordering System Offers Personalised Pricing,” M2 Presswire, Jul. 18, 2000. |
Anon., “Open Market Introduces New Software for Dynamic Web-Based Commerce” PR Newswire, Oct. 1, 1996. |
Boroshok, Jon, “Wireless, Location-Based, Shopping Portal being Tested in New York City and San Francisco by GeePS.com, Inc.,” published Apr. 3, 2000, New York, NY and San Francisco, CA; as downloaded from http://www.techmarcom.com/geeps.html on Jan. 6, 2012. |
Business/High Tech Editors “Mercata Launches Compelling Alternative to Online Auctions,” Business Wire, Nov. 15, 2000. |
ebay.com “eBay Services: The Feedback Forum,” Aug. 1, 2001, archived by archive.org: “http://web.archive.org/web/20010801145144/http://pages.ebay.com/services/forum/feedback.html”. |
Ha, Sung Ho et al., “Matching Buyers and Suppliers: An Intelligent Dynamic-Exchange Model,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2001. |
Hinze, Annika et al., “Location- and Time-Based Information Delivery in Tourism,” as downloaded Apr. 20, 2012 from http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/voisard/Papers/sstd03.pdf. |
IEEE Xplore Search Results, Aug. 12, 2007. |
Kauffman et al., “Bid Together Buy Together, On the Efficacy of Group-Buying Business models in Internet-based Selling,” May 16, 2001. |
Mercata.com “How to Ship an Order” Oct. 22, 2000, archived by archive.org: http://web.archive.org/web/20001022035135/http://www.mercata.com/cgi-bin/mercata/mercata/v1/pages/editorial.jsp?name=Ship+an+Order. |
Mercata.com, archived by archive.org on or before Jun. 19, 2000. |
Millman, H., “Legacy Data Links Shrinks Costs,” InfoWorld, vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 51, 56, Jan. 5, 1998. |
Rajaraman, Rajesh et al., “The Effect of Demand Elasticity on Security Prices for the Poolco and Multi-Lateral Contract Models,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 12, No. 3, Aug. 1997. |
Rozic, Jeff “Who's Watching While You Surf?” Inside Business 3, 5, 64, May 2001. |
Tippr http://www.tipper.com/ Internet Archive (Feb. 29, 2008)—http://web.archive.org/web/20080229121727/http://tippr.com/. |
WHN Selects MobShop to Power Aggregated Buying for WHN Exchange. Jan. 23, 2001. http://www.allbusiness.com/retail-trade/4291613-1.html. Last accessed Sep. 11, 2009, 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,884 Final Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,723 Office Action mailed Mar. 22, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,622 Final Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/270,133 Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/710,095 Office Action mailed Apr. 6, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/161,192 Office Action mailed Apr. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,668 Office Action mailed Feb. 9, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,668 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/160,128 Final Office Action mailed Feb. 22, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,147 Office Action mailed Jan. 10, 2012. |
Adam et al. “Strategic Directions in Electronic Commerce and Digital Libraries: Towards a Digital Agora”. ACM Computing Surveys [Online] 1996, vol. 28, Issue 4, pp. 818-835. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/269,360 Final Office Action mailed Jul. 6, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/710,095 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 28, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/881,923 Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,681 Office Action mailed Jun. 20, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,412 Final Office Action mailed May 1, 2012. |
eWinWin, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc. Appeal Per Curiam Decision dated Oct. 9, 2012. |
eWinWin, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc. Reply Brief of Appellant dated Jun. 4, 2012. |
eWinWin, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc. Brief of Appellee dated May 17, 2012. |
eWinWin, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc. Brief of Appellant dated Apr. 2, 2012. |
Order re Motion for Summary Judgment dated Nov. 23, 2011. |
eWinWin, Inc.'s Opposition to Groupon, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Nov. 8, 2011. |
Order re eWinWin, Inc. Motion for Reconsideration dated Oct. 3, 2011. |
Order re Claim Construction dated Sep. 5, 2011. |
eWinWin, Inc. Supplemental Brief in Support of Claim Construction dated Aug. 24, 2011. |
Groupon, Inc.'s Supplemental Claim Construction Brief dated Aug. 24, 2011. |
eWinWin, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Claim Construction dated Aug. 5, 2011. |
Groupon, Inc.'s Responsive Claim Construction Brief dated Aug. 5, 2011. |
Opening Claim Construction Brief of eWinWin, Inc.dated Jul. 5, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,054 Final Office Action mailed Nov. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,971 Office Action mailed Dec. 4, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,971 Office Action mailed Sep. 14, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,275 Office Action mailed Oct. 4, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,276 Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,658 Office Action mailed Oct. 30, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/452,647 Office Action mailed Dec. 7, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,512 Office Action mailed Dec. 10, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/523,820 Office Action mailed Nov. 8, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/525,040 Office Action mailed Nov. 23, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,622 Office Action mailed Dec. 3, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,622 Office Action mailed Sep. 12, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/881,923 Final Office Action mailed Oct. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,668 Office Action mailed Sep. 14, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,681 Final Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,158 Office Action mailed Dec. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,213 Final Office Action mailed Aug. 1, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/538,302 Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,418 Final Office Action mailed Jul. 26, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,415 Office Action mailed Aug. 31, 2012. |
Mercata.com, “Our Privacy Policy”, Archived by Archive.org on or before May 26, 2000. |
Mercata.com, “Special Offers”, Archived by Archive.org on or before Jun. 19, 2000. |
Mercata.com, “Terms of Use”, Published by Mercata.com, Nov. 6, 2000. |
We-Commerce.com, “The We-Commerce™ Network Mission”, Archived by Archive.org on or before Oct. 23, 2000. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,723 Office Action mailed Feb. 22, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/269,360 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/270,133 Final Office Action mailed Feb. 1, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,054 Final Office Action mailed Feb. 21, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,971 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 18, 2003. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,275 Final Office Action mailed Feb. 22, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,276 Final Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/452,647 Final Office Action mailed May 2, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,478 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 29, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,478 Office Action mailed Dec. 20, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,512 Final Office Action mailed May 2, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/523,820 Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/491,449 Final Office Action mailed May 2, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/491,449 Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/525,040 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 18, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,622 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,668 Office Action mailed May 10, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,668 Final Office Action mailed Dec. 24, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/609,250 Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,158 Final Office Action mailed Mar. 27, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,213 Office Action mailed Apr. 23, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,213 Final Office Action mailed Jan. 9, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/152,462 Office Action mailed Feb. 6, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/160,128 Office Action mailed May 23, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/538,302 Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,431 Office Action mailed Mar. 11, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/517/528 Office Action mailed May 8, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/584,809 Office Action mailed Feb. 14, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/681,403 Office Action mailed Aug. 21, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/270,133 Office Action mailed Jun. 21, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/523,820 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 28, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/891,154 Office Action mailed Aug. 28, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/881,923 Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,158 Office Action mailed Oct. 11, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,441 Office Action mailed May 31, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/152,462 Final Office Action mailed Aug. 22, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/704,151 Office Action mailed Jul. 30, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,415 Office Action mailed Sep. 16, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,431 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/584,809 Office Action mailed Jul. 24, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/710,095,Gregory J. Mesaros, Multiple Criteria Buying and Selling Model, filed Feb. 22, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,969, Gregory J. Mesaros, Presenting Offers to Users of Wireless Devices, filed Nov. 12, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,632, Gregory J. Mesaros, Presenting Offers to Users of Mobile Devices, filed Jan. 14, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/152,462, Gregory J. Mesaros, Flexible Ship Schedules and Dynamic Discounts, filed Jun. 14, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,412, Gregory J. Mesaros, Hosted Demand Aggregation, filed Dec. 29, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/198,964, Gregory J. Mesaros, Volume Pricing Search, filed Aug. 5, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,037, Gregory J. Mesaros, Discounts in a Mobile Device, filed Oct. 28, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/075,316, Gregory J. Mesaros, Promoting Offers Through Social Network Influencers, filed Nov. 8, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,723 Office Action mailed Nov. 25, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/269,360 Final Office Action mailed Dec. 6, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,969 Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110213653 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60133769 | May 1999 | US | |
60318789 | Sep 2001 | US | |
60137583 | Jun 1999 | US | |
60138209 | Jun 1999 | US | |
60139338 | Jun 1999 | US | |
60139518 | Jun 1999 | US | |
60139519 | Jun 1999 | US | |
60142371 | Jul 1999 | US | |
60160510 | Oct 1999 | US | |
60162182 | Oct 1999 | US | |
60173409 | Dec 1999 | US | |
60237474 | Oct 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11618412 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 13105387 | US | |
Parent | 10370237 | Feb 2003 | US |
Child | 11464376 | US | |
Parent | 09324391 | Jun 1999 | US |
Child | 10370237 | US | |
Parent | 10243456 | Sep 2002 | US |
Child | 11556604 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11464376 | Aug 2006 | US |
Child | 11618412 | US | |
Parent | 11556604 | Nov 2006 | US |
Child | 11618412 | US | |
Parent | 09922884 | Aug 2001 | US |
Child | 11618412 | US | |
Parent | 09324391 | Jun 1999 | US |
Child | 09922884 | US | |
Parent | 09426063 | Oct 1999 | US |
Child | 09324391 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US00/11989 | May 2000 | US |
Child | 09426063 | US |