This disclosure relates to implementations of a rear sight block for AK-type rifles having an integral mounting interface for an optical gun sight thereon. Further, in some implementations, the rear sight block may include one or more accessory mounting interfaces thereon.
There have been many attempts to improve on the iron sights commonly found on Kalashnikov or AK-type rifles (AK-47, AKM, AK-74, Galil, Tan Tal, Saiga, etc.). When the AK-47 was first introduced more than 75 years ago, optical gun sights (e.g., telescopic sights) were uncommon and expensive. In the modern era, the mounting of optical gun sights (e.g., reflex sights and/or telescopic sights) on both sporting and martial variants of the Kalashnikov is ubiquitous.
However, all of the available optical gun sight mounting options for the AK suffer from various shortcomings. Most of the optical gun sight mounts available are unable to hold the optic in the same place over time, resulting in the point of aim drifting significantly from the point of impact. Many of the optical gun sight mounts are heavy, often adding significant weight near the forend of the rifle thereby making the additional weight feel heavier than it is through leverage. Very few of the available optical gun sight mounts are available on off-the-shelf rifles, forcing the owner to procure and install an expensive part in order to facilitate the mounting of an optical gun sight on the rifle.
One optical gun sight (or optic) mounting solution is the UltiMAK rail (U.S. Pat. No. 6,381,895). It is an aftermarket replacement for an AK-type rifles gas tube which shields the piston that cycles the action upon firing. It is relatively light, securely mounts to the barrel (thereby holding the optic securely in place), and provides a MIL-STD-1913 rail (also known as the Picatinny rail). Once mounted, it's a simple matter to attach an optic thereon and, with other expensive mounting brackets, a flashlight.
However, the UltiMAK rail has several disadvantages. First, if you want to remove the lower hand guard, you have to remove the UltiMAK rail thereby removing the reference that the optical gun sight was previously calibrated to. It is then necessary to re-calibrate the optical gun sight to the rifle (called re-zeroing). Second, the location of the UltiMAK rail, being positioned over the barrel near the gas block, is a significant disadvantage if the optical gun sight mounted thereon has any appreciable mass. This is because the rifle acts as a lever, pulling down on the users arms with more force the farther the optical gun sight is away from the rear of the rifle. Third, the UltiMAK rail sits very low on the rifle making it possible to see both the iron sights and the reticule of the optical gun sight in one sight picture (also known as co-witnessing). By co-witnessing the two sights, the iron sights of the host rifle obstruct the operator's field of view through the lower half of the optic. This could result in the operator making an incorrect shoot or no-shoot decision. Therefore, it could be argued that positioning an optical gun sight on a rifle so that the field of view therethrough is unobstructed is a better option in a dynamic shooting environment. Fourth, securing a flashlight to the UltiMAK is expensive and requires the purchase of an additional bracket. When secured to the rifle, the flashlight makes the rifle heavier than is necessary due to its forward location on the rifle.
It is generally agreed upon in today's martial gun handling schools that a fighting rifle should have both an optic (e.g., reflex type sight and/or telescopic sight) and a flashlight mounted on it. The use of an optic has been shown to decrease target acquisition time and the flashlight is essential for distinguishing threats (e.g., a burglar) from innocent bystanders (e.g., family members) in low light conditions (e.g., in a dark house).
Therefore, there is a persistent need in the market for a rugged, simple, and inexpensive mount that can be used to securely attach an optic and/or flashlight to an AK-type rifle in an ergonomic position.
Implementations of a rear sight block for AK-type rifles are provided. In some implementations, the rear sight block may be drop-in-compatible with most AK-type rifles and performs several functions (e.g., providing a guide hole for the piston of an AK-type rifles operating system) associated with prior art rear sight blocks found on AK-type rifles. In some implementations, the rear sight block comprises an optic mounting interface having an integral rear sight notch therein, and at least one accessory mounting interface. In some implementations, the optic mounting interface places an optical gun sight secured thereto in line with the iron sights of the host AK-type rifle. In some implementations, the accessory mounting interface may be used to position a flashlight, laser, and/or other firearm accessory on the left (or right) side of the rear sight block. In some implementations, the rear sight block is mounted at or near the rifle's approximate center of mass. In this way, weight in the form of an optic and/or other firearm accessory (e.g., a flashlight and/or laser) secured to the rear sight block is unlikely to change the balance or “feel” of the rifle when handled by an operator.
In general, the rear sight block 100 for AK-type rifles disclosed herein is a rugged, simple, and inexpensive mount that may be used to securely attach and ergonomically position an optic and/or a firearm accessory (e.g., a flashlight and/or laser) on an AK-type rifle. In this way, the rear sight block 100 may be superior to prior art rear sight blocks found on AK-type rifles.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The key innovation of the rear sight block 100 disclosed herein comes from the realization that the highly adjustable rear sight (not shown) found on prior art AK-type rifles is ineffective, especially given all of its mechanical complexity. The ineffectiveness of the prior art adjustable rear sight is tied to the ammunition (7.62×39 mm and 5.45×39 mm) and thereby the bullets (i.e. projectiles) fired from AK-type rifles. The standard projectiles fired from AK-type rifles loose very little elevation due to gravity at ranges less than 300 meters, where adjustment of the rear sight is not generally needed. At ranges greater than 300 meters, both the gun and the ammunition are sufficiently inaccurate as to make elevation adjustments using the rear sight irrelevant. Implementations of the rear sight block 100 disclosed herein omit the adjustable rear sight found in the prior art and instead provide an optic mounting interface 110 having an integrated rear sight notch 102 therein (see, e.g.,
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In some implementations, not shown, there may be an accessory mounting interface 108 on the right side of the rear sight block 100. In some implementations, there may be two or more accessory mounting interfaces 108 on the rear sight block 100 (e.g., one on the left side and one of the right side of the rear sight block 100).
In some implementations, an accessory mounting interface 108 could be at a non-orthogonal angle relative to the optic mounting interface 110. In some implementations, an accessory mounting interface 108 may be positioned on the rear sight block 100 at a 45 degree angle relative to the optic mounting interface 110. In this way, for example, a user may mount a telescopic sight on the optic mounting interface 110 and offset a second optic (e.g., a reflex sight) at a 45 degree angle relative to the telescopic sight.
In some implementations, the rear sight block 100 may be fabricated from forged and/or machined 4340 steel. In some implementations, the rear sight block 100 may be fabricated from any suitable steel alloy, aluminum alloy, plastic, resin, fiberglass, ceramic, other metal alloy, or other structural material known to one of ordinary skill in the art. In some implementations, the rear sight block 100 may be fabricated using one or more of the following processes: machining, forging, extruding, casting, sintering, and/or 3-D printing. In fact, early prototypes of the rear sight block 100 were successfully implemented using 3-D printed nylon parts which performed very well in field testing.
An important aspect of the rear sight block 100 disclosed herein is its impact on the ergonomics of an equipped rifle.
For right hand dominant operators, another advantage of the preferred implementation of the rear sight block 100 shown in
Reference throughout this specification to “an embodiment” or “implementation” or words of similar import means that a particular described feature, structure, or characteristic is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the phrase “in some implementations” or a phrase of similar import in various places throughout this specification does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the inventions set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which these inventions pertain having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings.
The described features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. In the above description, numerous specific details are provided for a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that embodiments of the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations may not be shown or described in detail.
While operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown, or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 62/185,626, which was filed on Jun. 28, 2015, and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2295791 | Hornback | Sep 1942 | A |
5590484 | Mooney | Jan 1997 | A |
7685758 | Romer | Mar 2010 | B2 |
9068801 | Stecher, Jr. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
20120102803 | Troy | May 2012 | A1 |
20130219766 | Lee | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
K-Var internet article; Rear sight blocks with gas tube lock lever; Date unknown. |
quarterbore.net Forums, Polish WZ89 Onyks parts kit—Another addition to my Polish Collection! [online], [dated Nov. 8, 2005], [retrieved on Jul. 29, 2016], Retrieved from the internet <URL: http://www.quarterbore.net/forums/showthread.php?t=603>. |
Leszek Erenfeicht and Lt. Col. Dr. Miroslaw Zahor, A Tantalean Ordeal [online], ForgottenWeapons.com, [dated Sep. 13, 2013], [retrieved on Jul. 29, 2016], Retrieved from the internet <URL: http://www.forgottenweapons.com/rifles/wz-88-tantal/>. |
Przemyslaw Konicki, Beryl wz. 96 [online], http://www.opisybroni.republika.pl/, [retrieved on Jul. 29, 2016], Retrieved from the internet <URL: http://www.opisybroni.republika.pl/Beryl—eng.html>. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160377384 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62185626 | Jun 2015 | US |