1. Field of the Invention
The present development relates to a rear view mirror that facilitates properly aligning the mirror.
2. Background of the Invention
Mirror systems are provided on automotive vehicles to aid the operator of the vehicle in viewing other vehicles while merging, lane changing, turning, reversing, etc. Mirrors can provide a view of the vehicles and objects in the vicinity of the operator's vehicle. However, the effectiveness of that view depends on proper alignment of the mirrors. It is known in the art, through customer interviews, car clinics, and survey comments that many vehicle operators do not align their mirrors in an orientation which provides the most information to the operator.
In particular, it is common for drivers to position their exterior side mirrors so that they can see the edge of their own vehicle 10. As illustrated in
Properly adjusted exterior mirrors 12 and 14 are illustrated in
One of the advantages of adjusting the mirrors so that viewing region 16 includes a portion of vehicle 10 is shown in
To partially overcome maladjustment of the mirrors by many vehicle operators, some manufacturers provide the vehicle with larger mirrors than would otherwise be required if the mirrors were properly adjusted. Larger mirrors increase weight and aerodynamic drag to the vehicle, both of which penalize fuel economy. Also, the farther the mirrors extend from the vehicle, the greater the likelihood that the vehicle will clip an object in tight conditions such as entering a narrow garage opening or when moving the car close to a booth for collecting a parking ticket or paying a toll.
A rear view mirror assembly is disclosed which has a mirror coupled to an angle adjusting mechanism. The mirror has a viewing section and an alignment section which meet to form a reflex angle. The alignment section is etched with a targeting image. In one embodiment, the target image is a cross-hair. In another embodiment the image is an outline of the side surface of the vehicle. Typically, the viewing section, the viewing section, is larger than the alignment section, the targeting section. In one example the viewing section exceeds the alignment section by more than a factor of five in cross-sectional area. In one embodiment, the viewing and alignment sections are uninterrupted, but abutting each other, with the line of abutment being generally vertical.
The reflex angle is selected so that the target image of the outline lines up with the side surface of the vehicle from the viewpoint of the vehicle. The viewing section as viewed by the operator provides a desired image which excludes all parts of the vehicle. In one embodiment, the alignment section has lower reflectivity than the viewing section.
Also disclosed is a rear view mirror assembly in which a mirror is coupled to an angle adjusting mechanism. The mirror has a viewing section abutting an alignment section. The two are aligned with respect to other such that an imaginary, infinite plane of the viewing section and an imaginary, infinite plane of the alignment section intersect form an obtuse angle. The viewing section is more than 10 times larger in surface area than the alignment section. The abutting interface is generally vertical, i.e., more vertical then horizontal in orientation. The mirror assembly is coupled to a side of an automotive vehicle with the alignment section proximate the vehicle. The alignment section may have a lower reflectivity than the viewing section. The alignment section is etched with a feature which an operator of the vehicle aligns with a feature of the vehicle to ensure proper mirror adjustment.
In an alternative embodiment, the alignment section has a selective acceptance layer below the clear protective outer layer, and a colored substrate below the selective layer. The selective acceptance layer transmits light rays which are normal to its surface and absorbs non-normal light rays. The obtuse angle is selected so that when the alignment surface is aligned to allow an operator of the vehicle to observe the colored substrate, the viewing section as viewed by the operator provides an image which excludes all parts of the vehicle. The alignment surface is embedded in the viewing surface so that the two top surfaces are flush with each other, or, alternatively, the alignment surface may be applied to the surface of the viewing surface.
One embodiment includes a mirror assembly for a vehicle having an adjustable mounting structure and a mirror having a viewing section and an alignment section. The alignment section has a visual alignment feature that may be viewed to confirm that the viewing section is properly aligned with the adjustable mounting structure.
Also disclosed is a method for providing a mirror assembly for an automotive vehicle. A mirror frame is installed on an outside surface of the vehicle. A mirror adjustment mechanism is installed to the mirror frame. The mirror frame has a mirror mounted in which the mirror has a flat surface with a facet, the facet having an alignment feature to indicate when the mirror is properly aligned.
More drivers will be able to adjust mirrors properly if an affirmative method is provided for determining when the rear view mirror is properly adjusted. Properly adjusted mirrors afford the driver an improved view of the objects in the vehicle's vicinity which reduces or eliminates blind spots.
The cross-sectional area of the mirror may be minimized if the manufacturer can be confident that drivers properly adjust the mirrors. In some cases, manufacturers place larger mirrors on vehicles than strictly necessary, to overcome the problem of maladjusted mirrors giving inappropriate views. With assurance that the viewing angle is adjusted properly, manufacturers would not need to compensate for maladjusted mirrors. The benefits of smaller mirrors are improved fuel economy by reducing the area of cross-section of the vehicle with respect to the direction of travel. Also, rear view mirrors can be a source of wind noise, which would be lessened with smaller mirrors. Finally, mirrors are known to be clipped by encounters with fixed or moving objects. Examples of fixed objects are mail boxes, garage door openings, toll booths, and telephone poles. Any decrease in the size of the mirror can reduce the overall width of the vehicle, which allows for access to tighter places and a reduced chance of hitting the mirror with another object.
Customer satisfaction may be enhanced because a foolproof method is provided for properly adjusting the mirrors.
Referring to
Alternatively, in
Cross-hair 40 and targeting outline 42 of the outline of vehicle 10 are etched into the glass surface, in one embodiment. However, cross-hair 40 or targeting outline 42 could also be painted or marked on or within the glass in any known manner, in other embodiments.
In
Another way to define the angle is shown in
In
In
In
In
While particular embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, numerous variations and alternate embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the appended claims.
This application is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/259,713 filed Oct. 28, 2008, now abandoned, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1925666 | Kerns | Sep 1933 | A |
2514989 | Buren | Jul 1950 | A |
2622482 | Balkin | Dec 1952 | A |
2881655 | Eisenschink | Apr 1959 | A |
3628851 | Robertson | Dec 1971 | A |
3806232 | Gray | Apr 1974 | A |
4023029 | Fischer | May 1977 | A |
4040727 | Ketchpel | Aug 1977 | A |
4482210 | Brookman | Nov 1984 | A |
4730926 | Wedemeyer | Mar 1988 | A |
4859046 | Traynor et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4906085 | Sugihara et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5005797 | Maekawa et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5022747 | Polanyi et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5050977 | Platzer, Jr. | Sep 1991 | A |
5097362 | Lynas | Mar 1992 | A |
5113292 | Simson | May 1992 | A |
5122910 | Polanyi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5450246 | Jain | Sep 1995 | A |
5500773 | Easter | Mar 1996 | A |
5579133 | Black et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5642238 | Sala | Jun 1997 | A |
5805367 | Kanazawa | Sep 1998 | A |
5847889 | Komiyama et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5917666 | Kimble | Jun 1999 | A |
6357880 | Epstein et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6390632 | Palathingal | May 2002 | B1 |
6485151 | Coleburn | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6717712 | Lynam et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7167294 | Lynam et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7379243 | Horsten et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
20020041442 | Witt | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20040120056 | Goolsby | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20070030582 | Schnidt | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2507708 | Sep 1976 | DE |
2048189 | Dec 1980 | GB |
2261861 | Jun 1993 | GB |
55036112 | Mar 1980 | JP |
2003327046 | Nov 2003 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100259843 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12259713 | Oct 2008 | US |
Child | 12823724 | US |