Patent Grant
9040774
Disclosed herein are recombinant DNA constructs with DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA providing RNase III cleavage resistance to a target gene transcript. Such RNAs serve as cleavage blockers and translational inhibitors useful for modulating expression of a target gene. Further disclosed are miRNA recognition site sequences and their use in designing recombinant DNA constructs including miRNA-unresponsive transgenes, miRNA decoys, cleavage blockers, and translational inhibitors. Also disclosed are non-natural transgenic plant cells, plants, and seeds containing in their genome a recombinant DNA construct of this invention. Further disclosed are methods of modulating expression of a target gene using recombinant DNA constructs of this invention.
Several cellular pathways involved in RNA-mediated gene suppression have been described, each distinguished by a characteristic pathway and specific components. Generally, RNA-mediated gene suppression involves a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) intermediate that is formed intramolecularly within a single RNA molecule or intermolecularly between two RNA molecules. This longer dsRNA intermediate is processed by a ribonuclease of the RNase III family (Dicer or Dicer-like ribonuclease) to one or more small double-stranded RNAs, one strand of which is incorporated by the ribonuclease into the RNA-induced silencing complex (“RISC”). Which strand is incorporated into RISC is believed to depend on certain thermodynamic properties of the double-stranded small RNA, such as those described by Schwarz et al. (2003) Cell, 115:199-208, and Khvorova et al. (2003) Cell, 115:209-216.
The siRNA pathway involves the non-phased cleavage of a longer double-stranded RNA intermediate to small interfering RNAs (“siRNAs”). The size of siRNAs is believed to range from about 19 to about 25 base pairs, but common classes of siRNAs include those containing 21 base pairs or 24 base pairs. See, for example, Hamilton et al. (2002) EMBO J., 21:4671-4679.
The microRNA pathway involves microRNAs (“miRNAs”), non-protein coding RNAs generally of between about 19 to about 25 nucleotides (commonly about 20-24 nucleotides in plants) that guide cleavage in trans of target transcripts, negatively regulating the expression of genes involved in various regulation and development pathways; see Ambros et al. (2003)RNA, 9:277-279. Naturally occurring miRNAs are derived from a primary transcript (“pri-miRNA”) that is naturally processed to a shorter transcript (“pre-miRNA”) which itself is further processed to the mature miRNA. For a recent review of miRNA biogenesis in both plants and animals, see Kim (2005) Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 6:376-385. Gene regulation of biological pathways by miRNAs can occur at multiple levels and in different ways, including regulation of single or multiple genes, regulation of transcriptional regulators, and regulation of alternative splicing; see Makeyev & Maniatis (2008) Science, 319:1789-1790. Various utilities of miRNAs, their precursors, their recognition sites, and their promoters are described in detail in co-assigned U.S. Patent Application Publication 2006/0200878 A1, specifically incorporated by reference herein, which include: (1) the expression of a native miRNA or miRNA precursor sequence to suppress a target gene; (2) the expression of an engineered (non-native) miRNA or miRNA precursor sequence to suppress a target gene; (3) expression of a transgene with a miRNA recognition site, wherein the transgene is suppressed when the corresponding mature miRNA is expressed, either endogenously or transgenically; and (4) expression of a transgene driven by a miRNA promoter.
In the trans-acting siRNA (“ta-siRNA”) pathway, miRNAs serve to guide in-phase processing of siRNA primary transcripts in a process that requires an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase for production of a double-stranded RNA precursor; trans-acting siRNAs are defined by lack of secondary structure, a miRNA target site that initiates production of double-stranded RNA, requirements of DCL4 and an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RDR6), and production of multiple perfectly phased ˜21-nt small RNAs with perfectly matched duplexes with 2-nucleotide 3′ overhangs (see Allen et al. (2005) Cell, 121:207-221; Vazquez et al. (2004) Mol. Cell, 16:69-79).
The phased small RNA (“phased sRNA”) pathway (see PCT patent application PCT/US2007/019283, published as WO 2008/027592) is based on an endogenous locus termed a “phased small RNA locus”, which transcribes to an RNA transcript forming a single foldback structure that is cleaved in phase in vivo into multiple small double-stranded RNAs (termed “phased small RNAs”) capable of suppressing a target gene. In contrast to siRNAs, a phased small RNA transcript is cleaved in phase. In contrast to miRNAs, a phased small RNA transcript is cleaved by DCL4 or a DCL4-like orthologous ribonuclease (not DCL1) to multiple abundant small RNAs capable of silencing a target gene. In contrast to the ta-siRNA pathway, the phased small RNA locus transcribes to an RNA transcript that forms hybridized RNA independently of an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and without a miRNA target site that initiates production of double-stranded RNA.
Gene suppression mediated by small RNAs processed from natural antisense transcripts has been reported in at least two pathways. In the natural antisense transcript small interfering RNA (“nat-siRNA”) pathway (Borsani et al. (2005) Cell, 123:1279-1291), siRNAs are generated by DCL1 cleavage of a double-stranded RNA formed between the antisense transcripts of a pair of genes (cis-antisense gene pairs). A similar natural anti-sense transcript microRNA (“nat-miRNA”) pathway (Lu et al. (2008) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105: 4951-4956) has also been reported. In metazoan animals, small RNAs termed Piwi-interacting RNAs (“piRNAs”) have been reported to also have gene-silencing activity (Lau et al. (2006) Science, 313:363-367; O'Donnell & Boeke (2007) Cell, 129:37-44).
In one aspect, this invention provides a recombinant DNA construct including DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment.
Another aspect of this invention provides a recombinant DNA construct encoding a “cleavage blocker” for inhibiting double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of the at least one target gene, thereby increasing expression of the target gene (relative to expression in the absence of the cleavage blocker). One embodiment is a recombinant DNA construct including DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment, wherein the binding of the single-stranded RNA to the transcript (and the resultant formation of the hybridized segment) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of the at least one target gene.
Another aspect of this invention provides a recombinant DNA construct encoding a a “5′-modified cleavage blocker”. One embodiment includes a recombinant DNA construct including DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment, wherein the binding of the single-stranded RNA to the transcript (and the resultant formation of the hybridized segment) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of the at least one target gene, wherein the cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease is mediated by binding of a mature miRNA, the binding is at a miRNA recognition site (that is recognized by the mature miRNA) in the transcript, the cleavage of the transcript occurs at the miRNA recognition site, and the hybridized segment is formed at least partially within the miRNA recognition site, and the hybridized segment includes an A, G, or C (but not a U) at a position corresponding to the 5′ terminus of the mature miRNA that natively binds to the recognition site, but does not require mismatches between the single-stranded RNA and the miRNA recognition site at positions of the miRNA recognition site corresponding to positions 9, 10, or 11 (in 3′ to 5′ direction) of the mature miRNA, or insertions at a position in the single-stranded RNA at positions of the miRNA recognition site corresponding to positions 10 or 11 (in 3′ to 5′ direction) of the mature miRNA.
Another aspect of this invention provides a recombinant DNA construct encoding a “translational inhibitor” for inhibiting translation of the transcript, thereby decreasing expression of the target gene (relative to expression in the absence of expression of the construct). One embodiment is a recombinant DNA construct including DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment, wherein the binding of the single-stranded RNA to the transcript (and the formation of the hybridized segment) inhibits translation of the transcript.
Other aspects of this invention provide methods for modulating expression of miRNA target genes from plant species. Embodiments of this invention include methods to increase or improve yield of crop plants by expressing in such plants recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, for example, recombinant DNA constructs encoding a native miRNA precursor sequence or an artificial precursor sequence, or recombinant DNA constructs encoding a cleavage blocker or translational inhibitor or decoy.
Further aspects of this invention provide non-natural transgenic plant cells having in their genome a recombinant DNA construct of this invention. Also provided are a non-natural transgenic plant containing the transgenic plant cell of this invention, a non-natural transgenic plant grown from the transgenic plant cell of this invention, and non-natural transgenic seed produced by the transgenic plants, as well as commodity products produced from a non-natural transgenic plant cell, plant, or seed of this invention.
Unless otherwise stated, nucleic acid sequences in the text of this specification are given, when read from left to right, in the 5′ to 3′ direction. Nucleic acid sequences may be provided as DNA or as RNA, as specified; disclosure of one necessarily defines the other, as is known to one of ordinary skill in the art. The term “miRNA precursor”, as used herein, refers to an RNA transcript that is naturally processed to produce a mature miRNA. Where a term is provided in the singular, the inventors also contemplate aspects of the invention described by the plural of that term.
Recombinant DNA Constructs that are Processed to RNA Providing RNase III Resistance to a Target Gene Transcript
In one aspect, this invention provides a recombinant DNA construct including DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment. The recombinant DNA construct is made by techniques known in the art, such as those described under the heading “Making and Using Recombinant DNA Constructs” and illustrated in the working Examples. The recombinant DNA construct is particularly useful for making transgenic plant cells, transgenic plants, and transgenic seeds as discussed below under “Making and Using Transgenic Plant Cells and Transgenic Plants”. This invention therefore includes embodiments wherein the recombinant DNA construct is located within a vector for transforming a plant cell (such as within a plasmid or viral vector), or on a biolistic particle for transforming a plant cell, or within a chromosome or plastid of a non-natural transgenic plant cell, or within a non-natural transgenic cell, non-natural transgenic plant tissue, non-natural transgenic plant seed, non-natural transgenic pollen grain, or a non-natural transgenic or partially transgenic plant. Further included are embodiments wherein the recombinant DNA construct is in a commodity product produced from a non-natural transgenic cell, non-natural transgenic plant tissue, non-natural transgenic plant seed, non-natural transgenic pollen grain, or a non-natural transgenic or partially transgenic plant of this invention; such commodity products include, but are not limited to harvested leaves, roots, shoots, tubers, stems, fruits, seeds, or other parts of a plant, meals, oils, extracts, fermentation or digestion products, crushed or whole grains or seeds of a plant, or any food or non-food product including such commodity products produced from a transgenic plant cell, plant, or seed of this invention.
The processing of the DNA includes transcription of the DNA to a primary RNA transcript, which may undergo one or more additional natural processing steps that result in the single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene. In one embodiment, the processing of the DNA includes transcription of the DNA to an RNA intermediate including one or more double-stranded RNA stems; the double-stranded RNA stem or stems is further processed to single-stranded RNA. A final product of the DNA processing is the RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene.
For example, the recombinant DNA construct includes DNA that is transcribed to a primary transcript with a sequence derived from a native pri-miRNA or pre-miRNA sequence that forms secondary structure including one or more double-stranded stems, followed by processing of the primary transcript to a shorter, at least partially double-stranded intermediate (similar to a pre-miRNA) which is then cleaved by an RNase III ribonuclease (ribonuclease III, e.g., Drosha or DCL1 or a DCL1-like orthologous ribonuclease) to a pair of single-stranded RNAs (similar to a miRNA and a miRNA* pair). In another example, the recombinant DNA construct includes DNA that is transcribed to a primary transcript that forms secondary structure including one or more double-stranded stems, followed by cleavage of the double-stranded RNA stem(s) by an RNase III ribonuclease to one or more pairs of single-stranded small RNAs (similar to an siRNA duplex). In another example, the recombinant DNA construct includes DNA that is transcribed to a primary transcript that includes one or more spliceable introns that are removed by intronic processing. In yet another example, the recombinant DNA construct includes DNA that is transcribed to a primary transcript including one or more self-cleaving ribozymes (see, e.g., Tang & Breaker (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97:5784-5789); removal of the ribozyme(s) results in the RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene.
The RNA resulting from processing of the DNA includes at least single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene. In one embodiment, the RNA resulting from processing of the DNA consists of one single-stranded RNA molecule that binds to the transcript of one target gene. In another embodiment, the RNA resulting from processing of the DNA consists of one single-stranded RNA molecule that binds to the transcripts of multiple target genes. In another embodiment, the RNA resulting from processing of the DNA consists of multiple molecules of single-stranded RNA that bind to the transcript of at least one target gene; this can result, e.g., from processing of a primary RNA transcript having multiple segments, each including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene, for example, where the multiple segments (which can have the same or different sequence) are separated by self-cleaving ribozymes and cleavage of the ribozymes yields the multiple single-stranded RNAs. In another embodiment, the RNA resulting from processing of the DNA includes single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene, as well as additional RNA elements (which may be single-stranded or double-stranded or both), such as, but not limited to, an RNA aptamer, an RNA riboswitch, a ribozyme, site-specific recombinase recognition sites, or an RNA sequence that serves to regulate transcription of the single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene.
In various embodiments, the at least one target gene includes: coding sequence, non-coding sequence, or both coding and non-coding sequences; a single target gene or multiple target genes (for example, multiple alleles of a target gene, or multiple different target genes); or one or more of (a) an endogenous gene of a eukaryote, (b) a transgene of a transgenic plant, (c) an endogenous gene of a pest or pathogen of a plant, and (d) an endogenous gene of a prokaryotic or eukaryotic symbiont associated with a pest or pathogen of a plant. Target genes that can be regulated by a recombinant DNA construct of this invention are described in detail below under the heading “Target Genes”.
The single-stranded RNA binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially (in some cases perfectly) double-stranded RNA. In some embodiments the percent complementarity between the single-stranded RNA and the transcript of at least one target gene is 100%. However, it is clear that Watson-Crick base-pairing need not be complete between the single-stranded RNA and the transcript of at least one target gene, but is at least sufficient so that under physiological conditions a stably hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA is formed between the two.
The hybridized segment of double-stranded RNA imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease (for example, Drosha or Dicer or Dicer-like proteins, including, but not limited to, DCL1, DCL2, DCL3, DCL4, DCL1-like, DCL2-like, DCL3-like, or DCL4-like proteins) within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment. In many instances, the resistance imparted is resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within the hybridized segment. For example, where the single-stranded RNA binds to the transcript of at least one target gene at a miRNA recognition site in the transcript recognized and bound by an endogenous miRNA, such that the hybridized segment encompasses the miRNA recognition site, the hybridized segment of double-stranded RNA imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease at the miRNA recognition site (i.e., within the hybridized segment). In other instances, the resistance imparted is resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease in the vicinity of the hybridized segment. For example, where the single-stranded RNA binds to the transcript of at least one target gene immediately or closely adjacent to a miRNA recognition site in the transcript recognized and bound by an endogenous miRNA, such that the hybridized segment does not encompass the miRNA recognition site but is sufficiently close to prevent binding by the endogenous miRNA to the transcript, the hybridized segment of double-stranded RNA imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease at the miRNA recognition site (i.e., in the vicinity of, but not within, the hybridized segment).
The length of the single-stranded RNA is not necessarily equal to the length of the hybridized segment, since not all of the single-stranded RNA necessarily binds to the transcript of at least one target gene. In some embodiments, the length of the single-stranded RNA is about equal to, or exactly equal to, the length of the hybridized segment. In other embodiments, the length of the single-stranded RNA is greater than the length of the hybridized segment. Expressed in terms of numbers of contiguous nucleotides, the length of the single-stranded RNA is generally from between about 10 nucleotides to about 500 nucleotides, or from between about 20 nucleotides to about 500 nucleotides, or from between about 20 nucleotides to about 100 nucleotides, for example, about 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, about 30, about 35, about 40, about 45, about 50, about 60, about 70, about 80, about 90, about 100, about 120, about 140, about 160, about 180, about 200, about 240, about 280, about 320, about 360, about 400, or about 500 nucleotides. Expressed in terms of numbers of contiguous nucleotides (and recognizing that the hybridized segment can include nucleotides that are not base-paired), the length of the hybridized segment is generally from between about 10 nucleotides to about 100 nucleotides, or from between about 10 nucleotides to about 24 nucleotides, or from between about 20 nucleotides to about 100 nucleotides, or from between about 26 nucleotides to about 100 nucleotides, although it can be greater than about 100 nucleotides, and in some preferred embodiments it is preferably smaller than 100 nucleotides (such as in some embodiments of translational inhibitors, described below under the heading “Translational Inhibitors”). In preferred embodiments, the length of the hybridized segment is about 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, about 30, about 35, about 40, about 45, about 50, about 60, about 70, about 80, about 90, or about 100 nucleotides. In one particularly preferred embodiment, the length of the hybridized segment is between about 10 to about 24 nucleotides, e.g., about 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, or 24 nucleotides.
In many embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct of this invention includes other DNA elements in addition to the DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment. These additional DNA elements include at least one element selected from the group consisting of:
The recombinant DNA construct of this invention is particularly useful for providing an RNA that functions as a “cleavage blocker” or a “translational inhibitor”, according to the RNA's interaction with the transcript of the target gene(s). Cleavage blockers and translational inhibitors are described in more detail below.
Cleavage Blockers
One aspect of this invention is a recombinant DNA construct including DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment, wherein the binding of the single-stranded RNA to the transcript (and the resultant formation of the hybridized segment) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of the at least one target gene. In this context, the term “cleavage blocker” generally refers to the RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene, and more specifically refers to the portion(s) of the single-stranded RNA that forms a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA with the transcript. Cleavage blockers inhibit double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of the at least one target gene, thereby increasing expression of the target gene (relative to expression in the absence of the cleavage blocker).
Generally, the cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease is mediated by binding of a small RNA (most preferably a small RNA that is associated with a silencing complex) to the transcript. In preferred embodiments, the small RNA is selected from the group consisting of a miRNA, an siRNA, a trans-acting siRNA, a phased small RNA, a natural antisense transcript siRNA, and a natural antisense transcript miRNA; however, the small RNA can be any small RNA associated with a silencing complex such as RISC or an Argonaute or Argonaute-like protein. In some embodiments, the small RNA is an endogenous small RNA (e.g., an endogenous miRNA); in other embodiments, the small RNA is a transgenic small RNA (e.g., a transgenically expressed engineered miRNA).
In various embodiments, the length of the hybridized segment includes between about 10 base pairs to about 100 base pairs, although it can be greater than about 100 base pairs. In preferred embodiments (and recognizing that the hybridized segment can include nucleotides that are not base-paired), the length of the hybridized segment includes between about 10 base pairs to about 100 base pairs, such as from between about 10 to about 20, or between about 10 to about 24, or between about 10 to about 30, or between about 10 to about 40, or between about 10 to about 50, or between about 18 to about 28, or between about 18 to about 25, or between about 18 to about 24, or between about 20 to about 30, or between about 20 to about 40, or between about 20 to about 50 base pairs. In preferred embodiments, the length of the hybridized segment is about 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, about 30, about 34, about 40, about 45, about 50, about 60, about 70, about 80, about 90, or about 100 base pairs, wherein the hybridized segment optionally includes additional nucleotides that are not base-paired and that are not counted in the length of the hybridized segment when this is expressed in terms of base pairs. In particularly preferred embodiments, the length of the hybridized segment is between about 18 to about 28 base pairs (that is, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, or 28 base pairs), or between about 10 to about 24 base pairs (that is, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, or 24 base pairs), or between about 18 to about 24 base pairs (that is, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, or 24 base pairs) wherein the hybridized segment optionally includes additional nucleotides that are not base-paired and that are not counted in the length of the hybridized segment when this is expressed in terms of base pairs. One of skill in the art is able to determine what number of unpaired nucleotides is acceptable for a given hybridized segment, i.e., that will still allow formation hybridized segment that is stable under physiological conditions and is resistant to RNase III ribonuclease cleavage.
In some instances, the hybridized segment is completely base-paired, that is, contains a contiguous ribonucleotide sequence that is the same length as, and is perfectly complementary to, a contiguous ribonucleotide sequence of the target gene transcript. In particularly preferred embodiments, however, the hybridized segment is not completely base-paired, and includes at least one mismatch or at least one insertion in the hybridized segment at a position that results in inhibiting cleavage of the transcript by the RNase III ribonuclease.
One aspect of this invention provides a “miRNA cleavage blocker”. One preferred embodiment is a recombinant DNA construct including DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment, wherein the binding of the single-stranded RNA to the transcript (and the resultant formation of the hybridized segment) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of the at least one target gene, wherein the cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease is mediated by binding of a mature miRNA, the binding is at a miRNA recognition site (that is recognized by the mature miRNA) in the transcript, the cleavage of the transcript occurs at the miRNA recognition site, and the hybridized segment is formed at least partially within the miRNA recognition site. In this embodiment, the recombinant DNA construct yields a miRNA cleavage blocker RNA that binds to (or in the vicinity of) a miRNA recognition site in a target gene transcript, forming a hybridized segment that is itself resistant to RNase III ribonuclease cleavage (or that prevents RNase III ribonuclease cleavage of the transcript in the vicinity of the hybridized segment), thus preventing the mature miRNA that normally recognizes the miRNA recognition site from binding to the miRNA recognition site and mediating RNase III ribonuclease cleavage of the target gene transcript. In particularly preferred embodiments, the hybridized segment includes: (a) at least one mismatch between the single-stranded RNA and the miRNA recognition site at positions of the miRNA recognition site corresponding to positions 9, 10, or 11 (in 3′ to 5′ direction) of the mature miRNA, or (b) at least one insertion at a position in the single-stranded RNA at positions of the miRNA recognition site corresponding to positions 10 or 11 (in 3′ to 5′ direction) of the mature miRNA. In some preferred embodiments, the single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene has a nucleotide sequence to allow a stably hybridized segment to be formed between it and the target gene transcript, but that inhibits binding of an Argonaute or Argonaute-like protein to the hybridized segment, as described by Mi et al. (2008) Cell, 133:1-12; for example, the single-stranded RNA has a nucleotide sequence that includes an A, G, or C (but not a U) at a position corresponding to the 5′ terminus of the mature miRNA that natively binds to the recognition site. Most preferably, the binding of a miRNA cleavage blocker to the target gene transcript results in inhibition of miRNA-mediated suppression of the at least one target gene, thereby increasing expression of the target gene (relative to expression in the absence of the miRNA cleavage blocker).
Another aspect of this invention includes a “5′-modified cleavage blocker”. A preferred embodiment includes a recombinant DNA construct including DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment, wherein the binding of the single-stranded RNA to the transcript (and the resultant formation of the hybridized segment) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of the at least one target gene, wherein the cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease is mediated by binding of a mature miRNA, the binding is at a miRNA recognition site (that is recognized by the mature miRNA) in the transcript, the cleavage of the transcript occurs at the miRNA recognition site, and the hybridized segment is formed at least partially within the miRNA recognition site, and the hybridized segment includes an A, G, or C (but not a U) at a position corresponding to the 5′ terminus of the mature miRNA that natively binds to the recognition site, but does not include mismatches between the single-stranded RNA and the miRNA recognition site at positions of the miRNA recognition site corresponding to positions 9, 10, or 11 (in 3′ to 5′ direction) of the mature miRNA, or insertions at a position in the single-stranded RNA at positions of the miRNA recognition site corresponding to positions 10 or 11 (in 3′ to 5′ direction) of the mature miRNA. Binding of such a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to the target gene transcript results in inhibition of miRNA-mediated suppression of the at least one target gene, thereby increasing expression of the target gene (relative to expression in the absence of the cleavage blocker).
One of ordinary skill in the art easily recognizes that various aspects of this invention include analogous recombinant DNA constructs that are processed to provide RNA including single-stranded RNA that serve as an “siRNA cleavage blocker”, a “trans-acting siRNA cleavage blocker”, a “phased small RNA cleavage blocker”, a “natural antisense transcript siRNA cleavage blocker”, or a “natural antisense transcript miRNA cleavage blocker” (or, in general terms, a “small RNA cleavage blocker”), according to whether the RNase III ribonuclease cleavage that is inhibited is mediated by, respectively, an siRNA, a trans-acting siRNA, a phased small RNA, a natural antisense transcript siRNA, or a natural antisense transcript miRNA (or, in general terms, any small RNA associated with a silencing complex such as RISC or an Argonaute or Argonaute-like protein). In these cases, the formation of the RNase III ribonuclease cleavage-resistant hybridized segment generally prevents the respective small RNA from binding to the target gene transcript and mediating RNase III ribonuclease cleavage of the transcript. Most preferably, the binding of such a small RNA cleavage blocker to the target gene transcript results in inhibition of double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of the at least one target gene, thereby increasing expression of the target gene (relative to expression in the absence of the small RNA cleavage blocker). One of ordinary skill in the art is able to devise a nucleotide sequence for such an RNA including single-stranded RNA that, upon binding to the transcript of at least one target gene, forms a hybridized segment that is stable under physiological conditions and is resistant to RNase III ribonuclease cleavage, for example, (1) by selecting a nucleotide sequence that inhibits binding of an Argonaute or Argonaute-like protein to the hybridized segment, as described by Mi et al. (2008) Cell, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.034; (2) by selecting a nucleotide sequence such that the difference in free energy (“ΔΔG”, see Khvorova et al. (2003) Cell, 115, 209-216) between the portions of the single-stranded RNA and the target gene transcript that form the hybridized segment inhibit association with a silencing complex such as RISC or an Argonaute or Argonaute-like protein; or (3) by selecting a nucleotide sequence such that mismatches or insertions at a potential small RNA-mediated RNase III ribonuclease cleavage site prevents cleavage of the transcript. Knowledge of the target gene itself is not required, merely the sequence of the mature miRNA sequence or of a miRNA precursor that is processed to the mature miRNA—or, alternatively, knowledge of the miRNA recognition site sequence—in combination with the teachings of this application, in order to identify or design a cleavage blocker (or 5′-modified cleavage blocker) for inhibiting the target gene silencing effects of a given miRNA.
One approach to manipulating a miRNA-regulated pathway has been disclosed (see co-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/974,469, published as U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009-0070898 A1, which disclosure including rules for predicting or designing a miRNA decoy sequence is specifically incorporated by reference herein) as a novel miRNA “decoy”, a sequence that can be recognized and bound by an endogenous mature miRNA resulting in base-pairing between the miRNA decoy sequence and the endogenous mature miRNA, thereby forming a stable RNA duplex that is not cleaved because of the presence of mismatches between the miRNA decoy sequence and the mature miRNA.
The Examples of this application specifically identify miRNA targets recognized by particular miRNAs. Provided with this information and Applicants' teachings, one of ordinary skill in the art would be able to design and use various additional embodiments of this invention, including a recombinant DNA construct transcribable in a plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide selected from: (a) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target; (b) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target; (c) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target; (d) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target; (e) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of at least one miRNA target, wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (f) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target; (g) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target; and (h) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target.
Translational Inhibitors
Another aspect of this invention is a recombinant DNA construct including DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment, wherein the binding of the single-stranded RNA to the transcript (and the formation of the hybridized segment) inhibits translation of the transcript. In this context, the term “translational inhibitor” generally refers to the RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene, and more specifically refers to the portion(s) of the single-stranded RNA that forms a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA with the transcript. Translational inhibitors inhibit translation of the transcript, thereby decreasing expression of the target gene (relative to expression in the absence of expression of the construct).
Binding of the translational inhibitor is to a location of the mRNA that is wholly or at least partially within the coding sequence or in a location such that the formation of the hybridized segment interferes with translation. In one embodiment, the binding of the single-stranded RNA to the transcript (and the formation of the hybridized segment) occurs at least partially within the 5′ untranslated region of the transcript; this embodiment is often preferred where the transcript is of a plant target gene. In another embodiment, the binding of the single-stranded RNA to the transcript (and the formation of the hybridized segment) occurs at least partially within the 3′ untranslated region of the transcript; this embodiment is preferred where the transcript is of an animal target gene. In yet another embodiment, the binding of the single-stranded RNA to the transcript occurs within or in the vicinity of the start codon or of the 5′ cap, preferably preventing translation initiation.
In preferred embodiments, the hybridized segment is resistant to cleavage by the RNase III ribonuclease. In preferred embodiments, the length of the hybridized segment includes between about 10 base pairs to about 50 base pairs, although it can be greater than about 50 base pairs. In preferred embodiments (and recognizing that the hybridized segment can include nucleotides that are not base-paired), the length of the hybridized segment includes between about 10 base pairs to about 50 base pairs, such as from between about 10 to about 20, or between about 10 to about 30, or between about 10 to about 40, or between about 10 to about 50, or between about 18 to about 28, or between about 18 to about 25, or between about 18 to about 23, or between about 20 to about 30, or between about 20 to about 40, or between about 20 to about 50 base pairs. In preferred embodiments, the length of the hybridized segment is about 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, about 30, about 34, about 40, about 45, or about 50 base pairs, wherein the hybridized segment optionally includes additional nucleotides that are not base-paired and that are not counted in the length of the hybridized segment when this is expressed in terms of base pairs. In particularly preferred embodiments, the length of the hybridized segment is between about 18 to about 28 base pairs, that is, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, or 28 base pairs, wherein the hybridized segment optionally includes additional nucleotides that are not base-paired and that are not counted in the length of the hybridized segment when this is expressed in terms of base pairs. One of skill in the art is able to determine what number of unpaired nucleotides is acceptable for a given hybridized segment, i.e., that will still allow formation hybridized segment that is stable under physiological conditions and is resistant to RNase III ribonuclease cleavage.
One of ordinary skill in the art is able to devise a nucleotide sequence for such an RNA including single-stranded RNA that, upon binding to the transcript of at least one target gene, forms a hybridized segment that is stable under physiological conditions and is resistant to RNase III ribonuclease cleavage, for example, (1) by selecting a nucleotide sequence that inhibits binding of an Argonaute or Argonaute-like protein to the hybridized segment, as described by Mi et al. (2008) Cell, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.034; (2) by selecting a nucleotide sequence such that the difference in free energy (“ΔΔG”, see Khvorova et al. (2003) Cell, 115, 209-216) between the portions of the single-stranded RNA and the target gene transcript that form the hybridized segment inhibit association with a silencing complex such as RISC or an Argonaute or Argonaute-like protein; or (3) by selecting a nucleotide sequence such that mismatches or insertions at a potential small RNA-mediated RNase III ribonuclease cleavage site prevents cleavage of the transcript. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the length of the hybridized segment includes between about 19 to about 50 base pairs, the hybridized segment includes smaller segments of 9 or fewer contiguous, perfectly complementary base pairs, and at least one mismatch or insertion is between each pair of the smaller segments.
Methods of Modulating Expression of a Target Gene
In another aspect, this invention provides a method of modulating expression of a target gene, including expressing in a cell a recombinant DNA construct of this invention, that is, a recombinant DNA construct including DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment. Expressing in vivo in a cell a recombinant DNA construct of this invention provides an RNA that functions as a “cleavage blocker” or a “translational inhibitor”.
By “modulating expression of a target gene” is meant either: (a) increasing expression of the target gene, e.g., where the recombinant DNA construct expressed in the cell provides a cleavage blocker, or (b) decreasing expression of the target gene, e.g., where the recombinant DNA construct expressed in the cell provides a translational inhibitor. By “expressing in a cell” is meant carrying out in vivo the process of transcription, as well as any additional natural processing steps necessary to provide the RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene.
The cell in which the recombinant DNA construct is expressed is in many embodiments a eukaryotic cell (such as a plant, animal, fungus, or protist cell), and in other embodiments is a prokaryotic cell (such as a bacterial cell). The target gene that has its expression modulated by the method of this invention is not necessarily an endogenous gene of the cell in which the recombinant DNA construct is expressed. For example, this invention encompasses a method including expressing in cells of a plant a recombinant DNA construct including DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene of a pest or pathogen of the plant to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment, thereby either (a) increasing expression of the target gene of the pest or pathogen, when the recombinant DNA construct provides a cleavage blocker, or (b) decreasing expression of the target gene of the pest or pathogen, when the recombinant DNA construct provides a translational inhibitor. Where the target gene is not an endogenous gene of the cell wherein the recombinant DNA construct is transcribed (such as in cells of a plant), additional processing steps may occur either in the cell where transcription occurred, or in other cells (such as in cells of a pest or pathogen of the plant).
In one embodiment of the method, the recombinant DNA construct is expressed in a cell to provide a cleavage blocker RNA. In this embodiment, the binding of the single-stranded RNA to the transcript (and the formation of the hybridized segment) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of the at least one target gene, thereby increasing expression of the target gene, relative to expression in the absence of expression of the construct.
In one embodiment of the method, the recombinant DNA construct is expressed in a cell to provide a translational blocker RNA. In this embodiment, the binding of the single-stranded RNA to the transcript (and the formation of the hybridized segment) inhibits translation of the transcript, thereby decreasing expression of the target gene, relative to expression in the absence of expression of the construct.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are believed to generally regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally in plants by directing sequence-specific cleavage of messenger RNAs (“mRNAs”). One aspect of this invention is a method to control the rate of post-transcriptional suppression of a plant gene that transcribes to a mRNA containing a miRNA recognition site that is normally recognized and bound by a specific miRNA in complex with Argonaute (Ago), followed by cleavage of the resulting miRNA/mRNA hybridized segment by an RNase III ribonuclease such as a Dicer-like ribonuclease. This method uses a “cleavage blocker” construct to transgenically express in planta an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the mRNA transcript of the target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment, wherein the binding of the single-stranded RNA to the transcript (and the resultant formation of the hybridized segment) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of the at least one target gene. The “cleavage blocker” RNA generally competes with endogenous mature miRNAs, for binding with an mRNA that is normally regulated by that miRNA; the cleavage blocker protects the mRNA from cleavage by the miRNA-Ago complex by binding to the miRNA target site on the mRNA to form a non-cleavable hybridized segment. Thus, a cleavage blocker protects the target mRNA's cleavage site (miRNA recognition site) from being cleaved by miRNA and prevents down-regulation of that particular target gene. Preferably, a cleavage blocker increases expression of the target gene (relative to its expression in the absence of the cleavage blocker). This method allows for regulation of gene expression in a specific manner and is a useful alternative to upregulating the level of a gene's transcript or its encoded protein by over-expression of the gene.
One aspect of this invention is a method for providing a cleavage blocker by generating the cleavage blocker single-stranded RNA in planta from a “cleavage blocker construct” based on a recombinant miRNA-precursor-like sequence. A miRNA-precursor-like sequence is created by placing the cleavage blocker sequence in the backbone of a miRNA primary transcript, while maintaining the predicted secondary structure in the transcript's fold-back in such a way that resulting transcript is processed by Dicer-like ribonucleases to single-stranded RNA, which is then able to associate with the miRNA recognition site on the target mRNA and prevent the mRNA from being cleaved by a mature miRNA. The cleavage blocker sequence is selected such that, upon hybridization of the cleavage blocker to the target mRNA, a hybridized segment is formed that includes: (a) at least one mismatch between the single-stranded RNA and the miRNA recognition site at positions of the miRNA recognition site corresponding to positions 9, 10, or 11 of the mature miRNA, or (b) at least one insertion at a position in the single-stranded RNA at positions of the miRNA recognition site corresponding to positions 10-11 of the mature miRNA. In especially preferred embodiments, the single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene has a nucleotide sequence to allow a stably hybridized segment to be formed between it and the target gene transcript, but that inhibits binding of an Argonaute or Argonaute-like protein to the hybridized segment, as described by Mi et al. (2008) Cell, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.034; for example, the single-stranded RNA has a nucleotide sequence that includes an A, G, or C (but not a U) at a position corresponding to the 5′ terminus of the mature miRNA that natively binds to the recognition site. For cleavage blockers expressed in transgenic plants, there is in many embodiments preferably also a mismatch between the single-stranded RNA and the miRNA recognition site at the position of the miRNA recognition site corresponding to positions 1 of the mature miRNA to prevent transitivity of the suppression effect.
An alternative method for generating a cleavage blocker in vivo or in planta is to express short single-stranded RNA from a strong promoter such as Pol II or Pol III promoters. This single-stranded RNA preferably includes sequence that is complimentary to the mRNA only at the miRNA recognition site. Because producing a cleavage blocker using this method does not require the association of the RNA with an Argonaute or Ago protein, mismatches at positions 10 and 11 are not required.
Target Genes
The recombinant DNA construct of this invention can be designed to modulate the expression of any target gene or genes. The target gene can be translatable (coding) sequence, or can be non-coding sequence (such as non-coding regulatory sequence), or both, and can include at least one gene selected from the group consisting of a eukaryotic target gene, a non-eukaryotic target gene, a microRNA precursor DNA sequence, and a microRNA promoter. The target gene can be native (endogenous) to the cell (e.g., a cell of a plant or animal) in which the recombinant DNA construct is transcribed, or can be native to a pest or pathogen (or a symbiont of the pest or pathogen) of the plant or animal in which the recombinant DNA construct is transcribed. The target gene can be an exogenous gene, such as a transgene in a plant. A target gene can be a native gene targetted for suppression, with or without concurrent expression of an exogenous transgene, for example, by including a gene expression element in the recombinant DNA construct, or in a separate recombinant DNA construct. For example, it can be desirable to replace a native gene with an exogenous transgene homologue.
The target gene can include a single gene or part of a single gene that is targetted for suppression, or can include, for example, multiple consecutive segments of a target gene, multiple non-consecutive segments of a target gene, multiple alleles of a target gene, or multiple target genes from one or more species. A target gene can include any sequence from any species (including, but not limited to, non-eukaryotes such as bacteria, and viruses; fungi; plants, including monocots and dicots, such as crop plants, ornamental plants, and non-domesticated or wild plants; invertebrates such as arthropods, annelids, nematodes, and molluscs; and vertebrates such as amphibians, fish, birds, domestic or wild mammals, and even humans.
In one embodiment, the target gene is exogenous to the plant in which the recombinant DNA construct is to be transcribed, but endogenous to a pest or pathogen (e.g., viruses, bacteria, fungi, oomycetes, and invertebrates such as insects, nematodes, and molluscs), or to a symbiont of the pest or pathogen, of the plant. The target gene can include multiple target genes, or multiple segments of one or more genes. In one embodiment, the target gene or genes is a gene or genes of an invertebrate pest or pathogen of the plant. Thus, a recombinant DNA construct of this invention can be transcribed in a plant and used to modulate the expression of a gene of a pathogen or pest that may infest the plant. These embodiments are particularly useful in providing non-natural transgenic plants having resistance to one or more plant pests or pathogens, for example, resistance to a nematode such as soybean cyst nematode or root knot nematode or to a pest insect.
Where the target gene is that of an invertebrate pest, the invertebrate pest is at least one or more invertebrate selected from the group consisting of insects, arachnids (e.g., mites), nematodes, molluscs (e.g., slugs and snails), and annelids, and can include an invertebrate associated with an invertebrate pest in a symbiotic relationship (e.g., the mutualistic relationship between some ant and aphid species). The term “symbiotic” relationship as used herein encompasses both facultative (non-obligate) and obligate symbioses wherein at least one of the two or more associated species benefits, and further includes mutualistic, commensal, and parasitic relationships. Symbionts also include non-invertebrate symbionts, such as prokaryotes and eukaryotic protists. An invertebrate pest can be controlled indirectly by targetting a symbiont that is associated, internally or externally, with the invertebrate pest. For example, prokaryotic symbionts are known to occur in the gut or other tissues of many invertebrates, including invertebrate pests of interest. examples of a targetted symbiont associated with an invertebrate pest include the aphid endosymbiotic bacteria Buchnera; Wolbachia bacteria that infect many insects; Baumannia cicadellinicola and Sulcia muelleri, the co-symbiotic bacteria of the glassy-winged sharpshooter (Homalodisca coagulata), which transmits the Pierce's disease pathogen Xylella fastidiosa; and eukaryotic protist (flagellate) endosymbionts in termites. In an alternative approach, expression of an endogenous target gene of the invertebrate pest can be modified in such a way as to control a symbiont of the invertebrate, in turn affecting the host invertebrate.
The target gene can be translatable (coding) sequence, or can be non-coding sequence (such as non-coding regulatory sequence), or both. examples of a target gene include non-translatable (non-coding) sequence, such as, but not limited to, 5′ untranslated regions, promoters, enhancers, or other non-coding transcriptional regions, 3′ untranslated regions, terminators, and introns. Target genes include genes encoding microRNAs, small interfering RNAs, and other small RNAs associated with a silencing complex (RISC) or an Argonaute protein; RNA components of ribosomes or ribozymes; small nucleolar RNAs; and other non-coding RNAs. Target genes can also include genes encoding transcription factors and genes encoding enzymes involved in the biosynthesis or catabolism of molecules of interest (such as, but not limited to, amino acids, fatty acids and other lipids, sugars and other carbohydrates, biological polymers, and secondary metabolites including alkaloids, terpenoids, polyketides, non-ribosomal peptides, and secondary metabolites of mixed biosynthetic origin).
In many embodiments, the target gene is an essential gene of a plant pest or pathogen (or of a symbiont of the pest or pathogen). Essential genes include genes that are required for development of the pest or pathogen to a fertile reproductive adult. Essential genes include genes that, when silenced or suppressed, result in the death of the organism (as an adult or at any developmental stage, including gametes) or in the organism's inability to successfully reproduce (e.g., sterility in a male or female parent or lethality to the zygote, embryo, or larva). A description of nematode essential genes is found, e.g., in Kemphues, K. “Essential Genes” (Dec. 24, 2005), WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook, doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.57.1, available on line at www(dot)wormbook(dot)org. A description of insect genes is publicly available at the Drosophila genome database (available on line at flybase(dot)bio(dot)indiana(dot)edu/), and 438 essential genes have been identified for Drosophila as a representative insect; see Boutros et al. (2004) Science, 303:832-835, and supporting material available on line at www.sciencemag(dot)org/cgi/content/full/303/5659/832/DC1. A description of bacterial and fungal essential genes is provided in the Database of Essential Genes (“DEG”, available on line at tubic(dot)tju(dot)edu(dot)cn/deg/). Essential genes include those that influence other genes, where the overall effect is the death of the invertebrate pest or loss of the invertebrate pest's inability to successfully reproduce. In an example, suppression of the Drosophila homeobox gene Caudal leads eventually to host mortality caused by disequilibrium of the insect's commensal gut bacterial population (Ryu et al. (2008) Science, 319:777-782) and thus Caudal as well as the antimicrobial peptide genes directly controlled by Caudal are both considered essential genes.
Plant pest invertebrates include, but are not limited to, pest nematodes, pest molluscs (slugs and snails), pest annelids, and pest insects. Plant pathogens of interest include fungi, oomycetes, bacteria (e.g., the bacteria that cause leaf spotting, fireblight, crown gall, and bacterial wilt), mollicutes, and viruses (e.g., the viruses that cause mosaics, vein banding, flecking, spotting, or abnormal growth). See also G. N. Agrios, “Plant Pathology” (Fourth Edition), Academic Press, San Diego, 1997, 635 pp., for descriptions of fungi, bacteria, mollicutes (including mycoplasmas and spiroplasmas), viruses, nematodes, parasitic higher plants, and flagellate protozoans, all of which are plant pests or pathogens of interest. See also the updated compilation of plant pests and pathogens and the diseases caused by such on the American Phytopathological Society's “Common Names of Plant Diseases”, available online at www(dot)apsnet(dot)org/online/common/top(dot)asp.
Examples of fungal plant pathogens of particular interest include, e.g., the fungi that cause powdery mildew, rust, leaf spot and blight, damping-off, root rot, crown rot, cotton boll rot, stem canker, twig canker, vascular wilt, smut, or mold, including, but not limited to, Fusarium spp., Phakospora spp., Rhizoctonia spp., Aspergillus spp., Gibberella spp., Pyricularia spp., and Alternaria spp., and the numerous fungal species provided in Tables 4 and 5 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,194,636, which is specifically incorporated in its entirety by reference herein. examples of plant pathogens include pathogens previously classified as fungi but more recently classified as oomycetes. Specific examples of oomycete plant pathogens of particular interest include members of the genus Pythium (e.g., Pythium aphanidermatum) and Phytophthora (e.g., Phytophthora infestans, Phytophthora sojae,) and organisms that cause downy mildew (e.g., Peronospora farinosa).
Examples of invertebrate pests include cyst nematodes Heterodera spp. especially soybean cyst nematode Heterodera glycines, root knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp., corn rootworms (Diabrotica spp.), Lygus spp., aphids and similar sap-sucking insects such as phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae), corn borers, cutworms, armyworms, leafhoppers, Japanese beetles, grasshoppers, and other pest coleopterans, dipterans, and lepidopterans.
Specific examples of suitable target genes also include genes involved in amino acid or fatty acid synthesis, storage, or catabolism, genes involved in multi-step biosynthesis pathways, where it may be of interest to regulate the level of one or more intermediate; and genes encoding cell-cycle control proteins. Target genes can include genes encoding undesirable proteins (e.g., allergens or toxins) or the enzymes for the biosynthesis of undesirable compounds (e.g., undesirable flavor or odor components).
The recombinant DNA construct can be designed to be more specifically modulate the expression of the target gene, for example, by designing the recombinant DNA construct to include DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the target gene transcript, wherein the single-stranded RNA includes a nucleotide sequence substantially non-identical (or non-complementary) to a non-target gene sequence (and is thus less likely to bind to a non-target gene transcript). In one example, the recombinant DNA construct is designed to suppress a target gene that is a gene endogenous to a single species (e.g., Western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte) but to not suppress a non-target gene such as genes from related, even closely related, species (e.g., Northern corn rootworm, Diabrotica barberi Smith and Lawrence, or Southern corn rootworm, Diabrotica undecimpunctata). In other embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct is designed to modulate the expression of a target gene sequence common to multiple species in which the target gene is to be silenced. For example, a recombinant DNA construct for modulating a target gene in corn rootworm can be selected to be specific to all members of the genus Diabrotica. In a further example of this embodiment, such a Diabrotica-targetted recombinant DNA construct can be selected so as to not target any gene sequence from beneficial insect species.
Promoters
Generally, the recombinant DNA construct of this invention includes a promoter, functional in the cell in which the construct is intended to be transcribed, and operably linked to the DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene. In various embodiments, the promoter is selected from the group consisting of a constitutive promoter, a spatially specific promoter, a temporally specific promoter, a developmentally specific promoter, and an inducible promoter.
Non-constitutive promoters suitable for use with the recombinant DNA constructs of the invention include spatially specific promoters, temporally specific promoters, and inducible promoters. Spatially specific promoters can include organelle-, cell-, tissue-, or organ-specific promoters (e.g., a plastid-specific, a root-specific, a pollen-specific, or a seed-specific promoter for suppressing expression of the first target RNA in plastids, roots, pollen, or seeds, respectively). In many cases a seed-specific, embryo-specific, aleurone-specific, or endosperm-specific promoter is especially useful. Temporally specific promoters can include promoters that tend to promote expression during certain developmental stages in a plant's growth cycle, or during different times of day or night, or at different seasons in a year. Inducible promoters include promoters induced by chemicals or by environmental conditions such as, but not limited to, biotic or abiotic stress (e.g., water deficit or drought, heat, cold, high or low nutrient or salt levels, high or low light levels, or pest or pathogen infection). Of particular interest are microRNA promoters, especially those having a temporally specific, spatially specific, or inducible expression pattern; examples of miRNA promoters, as well as methods for identifying miRNA promoters having specific expression patterns, are provided in U.S. Patent Application Publications 2006/0200878, 2007/0199095, and 2007/0300329, which are specifically incorporated herein by reference. An expression-specific promoter can also include promoters that are generally constitutively expressed but at differing degrees or “strengths” of expression, including promoters commonly regarded as “strong promoters” or as “weak promoters”.
Promoters of particular interest include the following examples: an opaline synthase promoter isolated from T-DNA of Agrobacterium; a cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter; enhanced promoter elements or chimeric promoter elements such as an enhanced cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter linked to an enhancer element (an intron from heat shock protein 70 of Zea mays); root specific promoters such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,837,848; 6,437,217 and 6,426,446; a maize L3 oleosin promoter disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,433,252; a promoter for a plant nuclear gene encoding a plastid-localized aldolase disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/0216189; cold-inducible promoters disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,084,089; salt-inducible promoters disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,140,078; light-inducible promoters disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,294,714; pathogen-inducible promoters disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,252,138; and water deficit-inducible promoters disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/0123347 A1. All of the above-described patents and patent publications disclosing promoters and their use, especially in recombinant DNA constructs functional in plants are incorporated herein by reference.
Plant vascular- or phloem-specific promoters of interest include a rolC or rolA promoter of Agrobacterium rhizogenes, a promoter of a Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-DNA gene 5, the rice sucrose synthase RSs1 gene promoter, a Commelina yellow mottle badnavirus promoter, a coconut foliar decay virus promoter, a rice tungro bacilliform virus promoter, the promoter of a pea glutamine synthase GS3A gene, a invCD111 and invCD141 promoters of a potato invertase genes, a promoter isolated from Arabidopsis shown to have phloem-specific expression in tobacco by Kertbundit et al. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 88:5212-5216, a VAHOX1 promoter region, a pea cell wall invertase gene promoter, an acid invertase gene promoter from carrot, a promoter of a sulfate transporter gene Sultr1; 3, a promoter of a plant sucrose synthase gene, and a promoter of a plant sucrose transporter gene.
Promoters suitable for use with a recombinant DNA construct of this invention include polymerase II (“pol II”) promoters and polymerase III (“pol III”) promoters. RNA polymerase II transcribes structural or catalytic RNAs that are usually shorter than 400 nucleotides in length, and recognizes a simple run of T residues as a termination signal; it has been used to transcribe siRNA duplexes (see, e.g., Lu et al. (2004) Nucleic Acids Res., 32:e171). Pol II promoters are therefore preferred in certain embodiments where a short RNA transcript is to be produced from a recombinant DNA construct of this invention. In one embodiment, the recombinant DNA construct includes a pol II promoter to express an RNA transcript flanked by self-cleaving ribozyme sequences (e.g., self-cleaving hammerhead ribozymes), resulting in a processed RNA, including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene, with defined 5′ and 3′ ends, free of potentially interfering flanking sequences. An alternative approach uses pol III promoters to generate transcripts with relatively defined 5′ and 3′ ends, i.e., to transcribe an RNA with minimal 5′ and 3′ flanking sequences. In some embodiments, Pol III promoters (e.g., U6 or H1 promoters) are preferred for adding a short AT-rich transcription termination site that results in 2 base-pair overhangs (UU) in the transcribed RNA; this is useful, e.g., for expression of siRNA-type constructs. Use of pol III promoters for driving expression of siRNA constructs has been reported; see van de Wetering et al. (2003) EMBO Rep., 4: 609-615, and Tuschl (2002) Nature Biotechnol., 20: 446-448.
The promoter element can include nucleic acid sequences that are not naturally occurring promoters or promoter elements or homologues thereof but that can regulate expression of a gene. Examples of such “gene independent” regulatory sequences include naturally occurring or artificially designed RNA sequences that include a ligand-binding region or aptamer (see “Aptamers”, below) and a regulatory region (which can be cis-acting). See, for example, Isaacs et al. (2004) Nat. Biotechnol., 22:841-847, Bayer and Smolke (2005) Nature Biotechnol., 23:337-343, Mandal and Breaker (2004) Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 5:451-463, Davidson and Ellington (2005) Trends Biotechnol., 23:109-112, Winkler et al. (2002) Nature, 419:952-956, Sudarsan et al. (2003) RNA, 9:644-647, and Mandal and Breaker (2004) Nature Struct. Mol. Biol., 11:29-35. Such “riboregulators” could be selected or designed for specific spatial or temporal specificity, for example, to regulate translation of the DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene only in the presence (or absence) of a given concentration of the appropriate ligand. One example is a riboregulator that is responsive to an endogenous ligand (e.g., jasmonic acid or salicylic acid) produced by the plant when under stress (e.g., abiotic stress such as water, temperature, or nutrient stress, or biotic stress such as attach by pests or pathogens); under stress, the level of endogenous ligand increases to a level sufficient for the riboregulator to begin transcription of the DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene.
Aptamers
In some embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct of this invention includes DNA that is processed to an RNA aptamer, that is, an RNA that binds to a ligand through binding mechanism that is not primarily based on Watson-Crick base-pairing (in contrast, for example, to the base-pairing that occurs between complementary, anti-parallel nucleic acid strands to form a double-stranded nucleic acid structure). See, for example, Ellington and Szostak (1990) Nature, 346:818-822. Examples of aptamers can be found, for example, in the public Aptamer Database, available on line at aptamer.icmb.utexas.edu (Lee et al. (2004) Nucleic Acids Res., 32(1):D95-100). Aptamers useful in the invention can, however, be monovalent (binding a single ligand) or multivalent (binding more than one individual ligand, e.g., binding one unit of two or more different ligands).
Ligands useful in the invention include any molecule (or part of a molecule) that can be recognized and be bound by a nucleic acid secondary structure by a mechanism not primarily based on Watson-Crick base pairing. In this way, the recognition and binding of ligand and aptamer is analogous to that of antigen and antibody, or of biological effector and receptor. Ligands can include single molecules (or part of a molecule), or a combination of two or more molecules (or parts of a molecule), and can include one or more macromolecular complexes (e.g., polymers, lipid bilayers, liposomes, cellular membranes or other cellular structures, or cell surfaces). Examples of specific ligands include vitamins such as coenzyme B12 and thiamine pyrophosphate, flavin mononucleotide, guanine, adenosine, S-adenosylmethionine, S-adenosylhomocysteine, coenzyme A, lysine, tyrosine, dopamine, glucosamine-6-phosphate, caffeine, theophylline, antibiotics such as chloramphenicol and neomycin, herbicides such as glyphosate and dicamba, proteins including viral or phage coat proteins and invertebrate epidermal or digestive tract surface proteins, and RNAs including viral RNA, transfer-RNAs (t-RNAs), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), and RNA polymerases such as RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP). One class of RNA aptamers useful in the invention are “thermoswitches” that do not bind a ligand but are thermally responsive, that is to say, the aptamer's conformation is determined by temperature; see, for example, Box 3 in Mandal and Breaker (2004) Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 5:451-463.
Transgene Transcription Units
In some embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct of this invention includes a transgene transcription unit. A transgene transcription unit includes DNA sequence encoding a gene of interest, e.g., a natural protein or a heterologous protein. A gene of interest can be any coding or non-coding sequence from any species (including, but not limited to, non-eukaryotes such as bacteria, and viruses; fungi, protists, plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates. Genes of interest include those genes also described above as target genes, under the heading “Target Genes”. The transgene transcription unit can further include 5′ or 3′ sequence or both as required for transcription of the transgene.
Introns
In some embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct of this invention includes DNA encoding a spliceable intron. By “intron” is generally meant a segment of DNA (or the RNA transcribed from such a segment) that is located between exons (protein-encoding segments of the DNA or corresponding transcribed RNA), wherein, during maturation of the messenger RNA, the intron present is enzymatically “spliced out” or removed from the RNA strand by a cleavage/ligation process that occurs in the nucleus in eukaryotes. The term “intron” is also applied to non-coding DNA sequences that are transcribed to RNA segments that can be spliced out of a maturing RNA transcript, but are not introns found between protein-coding exons. One example of these are spliceable sequences that that have the ability to enhance expression in plants (in some cases, especially in monocots) of a downstream coding sequence; these spliceable sequences are naturally located in the 5′ untranslated region of some plant genes, as well as in some viral genes (e.g., the tobacco mosaic virus 5′ leader sequence or “omega” leader described as enhancing expression in plant genes by Gallie and Walbot (1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20:4631-4638). These spliceable sequences or “expression-enhancing introns” can be artificially inserted in the 5′ untranslated region of a plant gene between the promoter but before any protein-coding exons. Examples of such expression-enhancing introns include, but are not limited to, a maize alcohol dehydrogenase (Zm-Adh1), a maize Bronze-1 expression-enhancing intron, a rice actin 1 (Os-Act1) intron, a Shrunken-1 (Sh-1) intron, a maize sucrose synthase intron, a heat shock protein 18 (hsp18) intron, and an 82 kilodalton heat shock protein (hsp82) intron. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,593,874 and 5,859,347, specifically incorporated by reference herein, describe methods of improving recombinant DNA constructs for use in plants by inclusion of an expression-enhancing intron derived from the 70 kilodalton maize heat shock protein (hsp70) in the non-translated leader positioned 3′ from the gene promoter and 5′ from the first protein-coding exon.
Ribozymes
In some embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct of this invention includes DNA encoding one or more ribozymes. Ribozymes of particular interest include a self-cleaving ribozyme, a hammerhead ribozyme, or a hairpin ribozyme. In one embodiment, the recombinant DNA construct includes DNA encoding one or more ribozymes that serve to cleave the transcribed RNA to provide defined segments of RNA, such as the single-stranded RNA that binds to the target gene transcript.
Recombinases
In some embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct of this invention includes DNA encoding one or more site-specific recombinase recognition sites. In one embodiment, the recombinant DNA construct includes at least a pair of loxP sites, wherein site-specific recombination of DNA between the loxP sites is mediated by a Cre recombinase. The position and relative orientation of the loxP sites is selected to achieve the desired recombination; for example, when the loxP sites are in the same orientation, the DNA between the loxP sites is excised in circular form. In another embodiment, the recombinant DNA construct includes DNA encoding one loxP site; in the presence of Cre recombinase and another DNA with a loxP site, the two DNAs are recombined.
Gene Suppression Elements
In some embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct of this invention further includes DNA encoding a gene suppression element. Gene suppression elements include any DNA sequence (or RNA sequence encoded therein) designed to specifically suppress a gene or genes of interest, which can be a gene endogenous to the cell in which the recombinant DNA construct is transcribed, or a gene exogenous to that cell. The gene to be suppressed can be any of those disclosed as target genes under the heading “Target Genes”.
Suitable gene suppression elements are described in detail in U.S. Patent Application Publication 2006/0200878, which disclosure is specifically incorporated herein by reference, and include one or more of:
In some embodiments, an intron is used to deliver a gene suppression element in the absence of any protein-coding exons (coding sequence). In one example, an intron, such as an expression-enhancing intron (preferred in certain embodiments), is interrupted by embedding within the intron a gene suppression element, wherein, upon transcription, the gene suppression element is excised from the intron. Thus, protein-coding exons are not required to provide the gene suppressing function of the recombinant DNA constructs disclosed herein.
Transcription Regulatory Elements
In some embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct of this invention includes DNA encoding a transcription regulatory element. Transcription regulatory elements include elements that regulate the expression level of the recombinant DNA construct of this invention (relative to its expression in the absence of such regulatory elements). Examples of suitable transcription regulatory elements include riboswitches (cis- or trans-acting), transcript stabilizing sequences, and miRNA recognition sites, as described in detail in U.S. Patent Application Publication 2006/0200878, specifically incorporated herein by reference.
Making and Using Recombinant DNA Constructs
The recombinant DNA constructs of this invention are made by any method suitable to the intended application, taking into account, for example, the type of expression desired and convenience of use in the plant in which the construct is to be transcribed. General methods for making and using DNA constructs and vectors are well known in the art and described in detail in, for example, handbooks and laboratory manuals including Sambrook and Russell, “Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual” (third edition), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY, 2001. An example of useful technology for building DNA constructs and vectors for transformation is disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/0115642 A1, specifically incorporated herein by reference. DNA constructs can also be built using the GATEWAY™ cloning technology (available from Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Calif.), which uses the site-specific recombinase LR cloning reaction of the Integrase/att system from bacteriophage lambda vector construction, instead of restriction endonucleases and ligases. The LR cloning reaction is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,888,732 and 6,277,608, and in U.S. Patent Application Publications 2001/283529, 2001/282319 and 2002/0007051, all of which are specifically incorporated herein by reference. Another alternative vector fabrication method employs ligation-independent cloning as disclosed by Aslandis et al. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res., 18:6069-6074 and Rashtchian et al. (1992) Biochem., 206:91-97, where a DNA fragment with single-stranded 5′ and 3′ ends is ligated into a desired vector which can then be amplified in vivo.
In certain embodiments, the DNA sequence of the recombinant DNA construct includes sequence that has been codon-optimized for the plant in which the recombinant DNA construct is to be expressed. For example, a recombinant DNA construct to be expressed in a plant can have all or parts of its sequence (e.g., the first gene suppression element or the gene expression element) codon-optimized for expression in a plant by methods known in the art. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,500,365, incorporated by reference, for a description of codon-optimization methodology for plants; see also De Amicis and Marchetti (2000) Nucleic Acid Res., 28:3339-3346.
Non-Natural Transgenic Plant Cells, Plants, and Seeds
In another aspect, this invention provides a non-natural transgenic plant cell having in its genome a recombinant DNA construct of this invention including DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment. This invention further provides a non-natural transgenic plant including the non-natural transgenic plant cell. In one embodiment, the non-natural transgenic plant is wholly composed of transgenic tissue. In another embodiment, the non-natural plant is a partially transgenic plant and includes non-transgenic tissue; in one example, the non-natural partially transgenic plant includes a non-transgenic scion and a transgenic rootstock including the non-natural transgenic plant cell. Further provided by this invention is a non-natural transgenic seed including the non-natural transgenic plant cell.
A non-natural transgenic plant of this invention includes plants of any developmental stage, and includes a non-natural regenerated plant prepared from the non-natural transgenic plant cells disclosed herein, or a non-natural progeny plant (which can be an inbred or hybrid progeny plant) of the regenerated plant, or seed of such a non-natural transgenic plant. Also provided is a non-natural transgenic seed having in its genome a recombinant DNA construct of this invention. The non-natural transgenic plant cells, transgenic plants, and transgenic seeds of this invention are made by methods well-known in the art, as described below under the heading “Making and Using Transgenic Plant Cells and Transgenic Plants”.
The non-natural transgenic plant cell can include an isolated plant cell (e.g., individual plant cells or cells grown in or on an artificial culture medium), or can include a plant cell in undifferentiated tissue (e.g., callus or any aggregation of plant cells). The non-natural transgenic plant cell can include a plant cell in at least one differentiated tissue selected from the group consisting of leaf (e.g., petiole and blade), root, stem (e.g., tuber, rhizome, stolon, bulb, and corm) stalk (e.g., xylem, phloem), wood, seed, fruit, and flower (e.g., stamen, filament, anther, pollen, microspore, carpel, pistil, ovary, ovules). The non-natural transgenic plant cell or non-natural transgenic plant of the invention can be stably transformed, e.g., fertile transgenic plants and their non-natural transgenic seed also containing the recombinant construct of this invention.
In some embodiments of this invention, the non-natural plant is a non-natural transgenic plant. In such embodiments, all cells (with the possible exception of haploid cells) and tissues of the non-natural plant contain the recombinant DNA construct of this invention. In other embodiments, the non-natural plant is partially transgenic, and includes natural non-transgenic tissue (for example, non-natural transgenic tissue grafted onto natural non-transgenic tissue). In one embodiment, the non-natural plant includes a natural non-transgenic scion and a non-natural transgenic rootstock including the transgenic plant cell, wherein the non-transgenic scion and transgenic rootstock are grafted together. Such embodiments are particularly useful where the plant is one that is commonly vegetatively grown as a scion grafted onto a rootstock (wherein scion and rootstock can be of the same species or variety or of different species or variety); examples include grapes, apples, pears, quince, avocados, citrus, stone fruits, kiwifruit, roses, and other plants of agricultural or ornamental importance. Specifically claimed embodiments include embodiments where (a) the non-natural partially transgenic plant includes a natural non-transgenic grape scion and a non-natural transgenic grape rootstock; and (b) the non-natural partially transgenic plant includes a natural non-transgenic fruit tree (e.g., pear) scion and a non-natural transgenic fruit tree (e.g., quince) rootstock.
Making and Using Transgenic Plant Cells and Transgenic Plants
Where a recombinant DNA construct of this invention is used to produce a non-natural transgenic plant cell, plant, or seed of this invention, transformation can include any of the well-known and demonstrated methods and compositions. Suitable methods for plant transformation include virtually any method by which DNA can be introduced into a cell. One method of plant transformation is microprojectile bombardment, for example, as illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,015,580 (soybean), 5,538,880 (maize), 5,550,318 (maize), 5,914,451 (soybean), 6,153,812 (wheat), 6,160,208 (maize), 6,288,312 (rice), 6,365,807 (rice), and 6,399,861 (maize), and 6,403,865 (maize), all of which are incorporated by reference for enabling the production of transgenic plants.
Another useful method of plant transformation is Agrobacterium-mediated transformation by means of Agrobacterium containing a binary Ti plasmid system, wherein the Agrobacterium carries a first Ti plasmid and a second, chimeric plasmid containing at least one T-DNA border of a wild-type Ti plasmid, a promoter functional in the transformed plant cell and operably linked to a gene suppression construct of the invention. See, for example, the binary system described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,159,135, incorporated by reference. Also see De Framond (1983) Biotechnology, 1:262-269; and Hoekema et al., (1983) Nature, 303:179. In such a binary system, the smaller plasmid, containing the T-DNA border or borders, can be conveniently constructed and manipulated in a suitable alternative host, such as E. coli, and then transferred into Agrobacterium.
Detailed procedures for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of plants, especially crop plants, include procedures disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,004,863, 5,159,135, and 5,518,908 (cotton); 5,416,011, 5,569,834, 5,824,877 and 6,384,301 (soybean); 5,591,616 and 5,981,840 (maize); 5,463,174 (brassicas including canola), 7,026,528 (wheat), and 6,329,571 (rice), and in U.S. Patent Application Publications 2004/0244075 (maize) and 2001/0042257 A1 (sugar beet), all of which are specifically incorporated by reference for enabling the production of transgenic plants. Similar methods have been reported for many plant species, both dicots and monocots, including, among others, peanut (Cheng et al. (1996) Plant Cell Rep., 15: 653); asparagus (Bytebier et al. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 84:5345); barley (Wan and Lemaux (1994) Plant Physiol., 104:37); rice (Toriyama et al. (1988) Bio/Technology, 6:10; Zhang et al. (1988) Plant Cell Rep., 7:379; wheat (Vasil et al. (1992) Bio/Technology, 10:667; Becker et al. (1994) Plant J., 5:299), alfalfa (Masoud et al. (1996) Transgen. Res., 5:313); and tomato (Sun et al. (2006) Plant Cell Physiol., 47:426-431). See also a description of vectors, transformation methods, and production of transformed Arabidopsis thaliana plants where transcription factors are constitutively expressed by a CaMV35S promoter, in U.S. Patent Application Publication 2003/0167537 A1, incorporated by reference. Various methods of transformation of other plant species are well known in the art, see, for example, the encyclopedic reference, “Compendium of Transgenic Crop Plants”, edited by Chittaranjan Kole and Timothy C. Hall, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2008; ISBN 978-1-405-16924-0 (available electronically at mrw.interscience.wiley.com/emrw/9781405181099/hpt/toc), which describes transformation procedures for cereals and forage grasses (rice, maize, wheat, barley, oat, sorghum, pearl millet, finger millet, cool-season forage grasses, and bahiagrass), oilsee crops (soybean, oilseed brassicas, sunflower, peanut, flax, sesame, and safflower), legume grains and forages (common bean, cowpea, pea, faba bean, lentil, tepary bean, Asiatic beans, pigeonpea, vetch, chickpea, lupin, alfalfa, and clovers), temperate fruits and nuts (apple, pear, peach, plums, berry crops, cherries, grapes, olive, almond, and Persian walnut), tropical and subtropical fruits and nuts (citrus, grapefruit, banana and plantain, pineapple, papaya, mango, avocado, kiwifruit, passionfruit, and persimmon), vegetable crops (tomato, eggplant, peppers, vegetable brassicas, radish, carrot, cucurbits, alliums, asparagus, and leafy vegetables), sugar, tuber, and fiber crops (sugarcane, sugar beet, stvia, potato, sweet potato, cassava, and cotton), plantation crops, ornamentals, and turf grasses (tobacco, coffee, cocoa, tea, rubber tree, medicinal plants, ornamentals, amd turf grasses), and forest tree species One of ordinary skill in the art has various transformation methodologies for production of stable transgenic plants.
Transformation methods to provide transgenic plant cells and transgenic plants containing stably integrated recombinant DNA are preferably practiced in tissue culture on media and in a controlled environment. “Media” refers to the numerous nutrient mixtures that are used to grow cells in vitro, that is, outside of the intact living organism. Recipient cell targets include, but are not limited to, meristem cells, callus, immature embryos or parts of embryos, and gametic cells such as microspores, pollen, sperm, and egg cells. Any cell from which a fertile plant can be regenerated is contemplated as a useful recipient cell for practice of the invention. Callus can be initiated from various tissue sources, including, but not limited to, immature embryos or parts of embryos, seedling apical meristems, microspores, and the like. Those cells which are capable of proliferating as callus can serve as recipient cells for genetic transformation. Practical transformation methods and materials for making transgenic plants of this invention (e.g., various media and recipient target cells, transformation of immature embryos, and subsequent regeneration of fertile transgenic plants) are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,194,636 and 6,232,526 and U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/0216189, which are specifically incorporated by reference.
In general transformation practice, DNA is introduced into only a small percentage of target cells in any one transformation experiment. Marker genes are generally used to provide an efficient system for identification of those cells that are stably transformed by receiving and integrating a transgenic DNA construct into their genomes. Preferred marker genes provide selective markers which confer resistance to a selective agent, such as an antibiotic or herbicide. Any of the antibiotics or herbicides to which a plant cell may be resistant can be a useful agent for selection. Potentially transformed cells are exposed to the selective agent. In the population of surviving cells will be those cells where, generally, the resistance-conferring gene is integrated and expressed at sufficient levels to permit cell survival. Cells can be tested further to confirm stable integration of the recombinant DNA. Commonly used selective marker genes include those conferring resistance to antibiotics such as kanamycin or paromomycin (nptII), hygromycin B (aph IV) and gentamycin (aac3 and aacC4) or resistance to herbicides such as glufosinate (bar or pat) and glyphosate (EPSPS). Examples of useful selective marker genes and selection agents are illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,318, 5,633,435, 5,780,708, and 6,118,047, all of which are specifically incorporated by reference. Screenable markers or reporters, such as markers that provide an ability to visually identify transformants can also be employed. Examples of useful screenable markers include, for example, a gene expressing a protein that produces a detectable color by acting on a chromogenic substrate (e.g., beta glucuronidase (GUS) (uidA) or luciferase (luc)) or that itself is detectable, such as green fluorescent protein (GFP) (gfp) or an immunogenic molecule. Those of skill in the art will recognize that many other useful markers or reporters are available for use.
Detecting or measuring transcription of the recombinant DNA construct in the transgenic plant cell of the invention can be achieved by any suitable method, including protein detection methods (e.g., western blots, ELISAs, and other immunochemical methods), measurements of enzymatic activity, or nucleic acid detection methods (e.g., Southern blots, northern blots, PCR, RT-PCR, fluorescent in situ hybridization).
Other suitable methods for detecting or measuring transcription of the recombinant DNA construct in the transgenic plant cell of the invention include measurement of any other trait that is a direct or proxy indication of the level of expression of the target gene in the transgenic plant cell in which the recombinant DNA construct is transcribed, relative to the level of expression in one in which the recombinant DNA is not transcribed, e.g., gross or microscopic morphological traits, growth rates, yield, reproductive or recruitment rates, resistance to pests or pathogens, or resistance to biotic or abiotic stress (e.g., water deficit stress, salt stress, nutrient stress, heat or cold stress). Such methods can use direct measurements of a phenotypic trait or proxy assays (e.g., in plants, these assays include plant part assays such as leaf or root assays to determine tolerance of abiotic stress). Such methods include direct measurements of resistance to an invertebrate pest or pathogen (e.g., damage to plant tissues) or proxy assays (e.g., plant yield assays, or bioassays such as the Western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte) larval bioassay described in International Patent Application Publication WO2005/110068 A2 and U.S. Patent Application Publication US 2006/0021087 A1, specifically incorporated by reference, or the soybean cyst nematode bioassay described by Steeves et al. (2006) Funct. Plant Biol., 33:991-999, wherein cysts per plant, cysts per gram root, eggs per plant, eggs per gram root, and eggs per cyst are measured.
The recombinant DNA constructs of the invention can be stacked with other recombinant DNA for imparting additional traits (e.g., in the case of transformed plants, traits including herbicide resistance, pest resistance, cold germination tolerance, water deficit tolerance, and the like) for example, by expressing or suppressing other genes. Constructs for coordinated decrease and increase of gene expression are disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/0126845 A1, specifically incorporated by reference.
Seeds of fertile transgenic plants can be harvested and used to grow progeny generations, including hybrid generations, of transgenic plants of this invention that include the recombinant DNA construct in their genome. Thus, in addition to direct transformation of a plant with a recombinant DNA construct of this invention, transgenic plants of the invention can be prepared by crossing a first plant having the recombinant DNA with a second plant lacking the construct. For example, the recombinant DNA can be introduced into a plant line that is amenable to transformation to produce a transgenic plant, which can be crossed with a second plant line to introgress the recombinant DNA into the resulting progeny. A transgenic plant of the invention can be crossed with a plant line having other recombinant DNA that confers one or more additional trait(s) (such as, but not limited to, herbicide resistance, pest or disease resistance, environmental stress resistance, modified nutrient content, and yield improvement) to produce progeny plants having recombinant DNA that confers both the desired target sequence expression behavior and the additional trait(s).
In such breeding for combining traits the transgenic plant donating the additional trait can be a male line (pollinator) and the transgenic plant carrying the base traits can be the female line. The progeny of this cross segregate such that some of the plant will carry the DNA for both parental traits and some will carry DNA for one parental trait; such plants can be identified by markers associated with parental recombinant DNA Progeny plants carrying DNA for both parental traits can be crossed back into the female parent line multiple times, e.g., usually 6 to 8 generations, to produce a homozygous progeny plant with substantially the same genotype as one original transgenic parental line as well as the recombinant DNA of the other transgenic parental line.
Yet another aspect of the invention is a transgenic plant grown from the transgenic seed of the invention. This invention contemplates transgenic plants grown directly from transgenic seed containing the recombinant DNA as well as progeny generations of plants, including inbred or hybrid plant lines, made by crossing a transgenic plant grown directly from transgenic seed to a second plant not grown from the same transgenic seed. Crossing can include, for example, the following steps:
It is often desirable to introgress recombinant DNA into elite varieties, e.g., by backcrossing, to transfer a specific desirable trait from one source to an inbred or other plant that lacks that trait. This can be accomplished, for example, by first crossing a superior inbred (“A”) (recurrent parent) to a donor inbred (“B”) (non-recurrent parent), which carries the appropriate gene(s) for the trait in question, for example, a construct prepared in accordance with the current invention. The progeny of this cross first are selected in the resultant progeny for the desired trait to be transferred from the non-recurrent parent “B”, and then the selected progeny are mated back to the superior recurrent parent “A”. After five or more backcross generations with selection for the desired trait, the progeny can be essentially hemizygous for loci controlling the characteristic being transferred, but are like the superior parent for most or almost all other genes. The last backcross generation would be selfed to give progeny which are pure breeding for the gene(s) being transferred, i.e., one or more transformation events.
Through a series of breeding manipulations, a selected DNA construct can be moved from one line into an entirely different line without the need for further recombinant manipulation. One can thus produce inbred plants which are true breeding for one or more DNA constructs. By crossing different inbred plants, one can produce a large number of different hybrids with different combinations of DNA constructs. In this way, plants can be produced which have the desirable agronomic properties frequently associated with hybrids (“hybrid vigor”), as well as the desirable characteristics imparted by one or more DNA constructs.
In certain transgenic plant cells and transgenic plants of the invention, it may be desirable to concurrently express a gene of interest while also modulating expression of a target gene. Thus, in some embodiments, the transgenic plant contains recombinant DNA further including a gene expression element for expressing at least one gene of interest, and transcription of the recombinant DNA construct of this invention is preferably effected with concurrent transcription of the gene expression element.
The recombinant DNA constructs of this invention can be transcribed in any plant cell or tissue or in a whole plant of any developmental stage. Transgenic plants can be derived from any monocot or dicot plant, such as, but not limited to, plants of commercial or agricultural interest, such as crop plants (especially crop plants used for human food or animal feed), wood- or pulp-producing trees, vegetable plants, fruit plants, and ornamental plants. Examples of plants of interest include grain crop plants (such as wheat, oat, barley, maize, rye, triticale, rice, millet, sorghum, quinoa, amaranth, and buckwheat); forage crop plants (such as forage grasses and forage dicots including alfalfa, vetch, clover, and the like); oilseed crop plants (such as cotton, safflower, sunflower, soybean, canola, rapeseed, flax, peanuts, and oil palm); tree nuts (such as walnut, cashew, hazelnut, pecan, almond, and the like); sugarcane, coconut, date palm, olive, sugarbeet, tea, and coffee; wood- or pulp-producing trees; vegetable crop plants such as legumes (for example, beans, peas, lentils, alfalfa, peanut), lettuce, asparagus, artichoke, celery, carrot, radish, the brassicas (for example, cabbages, kales, mustards, and other leafy brassicas, broccoli, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, turnip, kohlrabi), edible cucurbits (for example, cucumbers, melons, summer squashes, winter squashes), edible alliums (for example, onions, garlic, leeks, shallots, chives), edible members of the Solanaceae (for example, tomatoes, eggplants, potatoes, peppers, groundcherries), and edible members of the Chenopodiaceae (for example, beet, chard, spinach, quinoa, amaranth); fruit crop plants such as apple, pear, citrus fruits (for example, orange, lime, lemon, grapefruit, and others), stone fruits (for example, apricot, peach, plum, nectarine), banana, pineapple, grape, kiwifruit, papaya, avocado, and berries; plants grown for biomass or biofuel (for example, Miscanthus grasses, switchgrass, jatropha, oil palm, eukaryotic microalgae such as Botryococcus braunii, Chlorella spp., and Dunaliella spp., and eukaryotic macroalgae such as Gracilaria spp., and Sargassum spp.); and ornamental plants including ornamental flowering plants, ornamental trees and shrubs, ornamental groundcovers, and ornamental grasses.
This invention also provides commodity products produced from a non-natural transgenic plant cell, plant, or seed of this invention, including, but not limited to, harvested leaves, roots, shoots, tubers, stems, fruits, seeds, or other parts of a plant, meals, oils, extracts, fermentation or digestion products, crushed or whole grains or seeds of a plant, or any food or non-food product including such commodity products produced from a transgenic plant cell, plant, or seed of this invention. The detection of one or more of nucleic acid sequences of the recombinant DNA constructs of this invention in one or more commodity or commodity products contemplated herein is de facto evidence that the commodity or commodity product contains or is derived from a non-natural transgenic plant cell, plant, or seed of this invention.
In various embodiments, the non-natural transgenic plant having in its genome a recombinant DNA construct of this invention has at least one additional altered trait, relative to a plant lacking the recombinant DNA construct, selected from the group of traits consisting of:
In some embodiments, the non-natural transgenic plant is characterized by: improved tolerance of abiotic stress (e.g., tolerance of water deficit or drought, heat, cold, non-optimal nutrient or salt levels, non-optimal light levels) or of biotic stress (e.g., crowding, allelopathy, or wounding); by a modified primary metabolite (e.g., fatty acid, oil, amino acid, protein, sugar, or carbohydrate) composition; a modified secondary metabolite (e.g., alkaloids, terpenoids, polyketides, non-ribosomal peptides, and secondary metabolites of mixed biosynthetic origin) composition; a modified trace element (e.g., iron, zinc), carotenoid (e.g., beta-carotene, lycopene, lutein, zeaxanthin, or other carotenoids and xanthophylls), or vitamin (e. g., tocopherols) composition; improved yield (e.g., improved yield under non-stress conditions or improved yield under biotic or abiotic stress); improved ability to use nitrogen, phosphate, or other nutrients; modified agronomic characteristics (e.g., delayed ripening; delayed senescence; earlier or later maturity; improved shade tolerance; improved resistance to root or stalk lodging; improved resistance to “green snap” of stems; modified photoperiod response); modified growth or reproductive characteristics (e.g., intentional dwarfing; intentional male sterility, useful, e.g., in improved hybridization procedures; improved vegetative growth rate; improved germination; improved male or female fertility); improved harvest, storage, or processing quality (e.g., improved resistance to pests during storage, improved resistance to breakage, improved appeal to consumers); or any combination of these traits.
In another embodiment, non-natural transgenic seed, or seed produced by the non-natural transgenic plant, has modified primary metabolite (e.g., fatty acid, oil, amino acid, protein, sugar, or carbohydrate) composition, a modified secondary metabolite composition, a modified trace element, carotenoid, or vitamin composition, an improved harvest, storage, or processing quality, or a combination of these. In another embodiment, it can be desirable to change levels of native components of the transgenic plant or seed of a transgenic plant, for example, to decrease levels of an allergenic protein or glycoprotein or of a toxic metabolite.
Generally, screening a population of transgenic plants each regenerated from a transgenic plant cell is performed to identify transgenic plant cells that develop into transgenic plants having the desired trait. The transgenic plants are assayed to detect an enhanced trait, e.g., enhanced water use efficiency, enhanced cold tolerance, increased yield, enhanced nitrogen use efficiency, enhanced seed protein, and enhanced seed oil. Screening methods include direct screening for the trait in a greenhouse or field trial or screening for a surrogate trait. Such analyses are directed to detecting changes in the chemical composition, biomass, physiological properties, or morphology of the plant. Changes in chemical compositions such as nutritional composition of grain are detected by analysis of the seed composition and content of protein, free amino acids, oil, free fatty acids, starch, tocopherols, or other nutrients. Changes in growth or biomass characteristics are detected by measuring plant height, stem diameter, internode length, root and shoot dry weights, and (for grain-producing plants such as maize, rice, or wheat) ear or seed head length and diameter. Changes in physiological properties are identified by evaluating responses to stress conditions, e.g., assays under imposed stress conditions such as water deficit, nitrogen or phosphate deficiency, cold or hot growing conditions, pathogen or insect attack, light deficiency, or increased plant density. Other selection properties include days to pollen shed, days to silking in maize, leaf extension rate, chlorophyll content, leaf temperature, stand, seedling vigor, internode length, plant height, leaf number, leaf area, tillering, brace roots, staying green, stalk lodging, root lodging, plant health, fertility, green snap, and pest resistance. In addition, phenotypic characteristics of harvested seed may be evaluated; for example, in maize this can include the number of kernels per row on the ear, number of rows of kernels on the ear, kernel abortion, kernel weight, kernel size, kernel density and physical grain quality. The following illustrates examples of screening assays useful for identifying desired traits in maize plants. These can be readily adapted for screening other plants such as canola, cotton, and soybean either as hybrids or inbreds.
Transgenic maize plants having nitrogen use efficiency are identified by screening in fields with three levels of nitrogen fertilizer being applied, e.g. low level (0 pounds/acre), medium level (80 pounds/acre) and high level (180 pounds/acre). Plants with enhanced nitrogen use efficiency provide higher yield as compared to control plants.
Transgenic maize plants having enhanced yield are identified by screening the transgenic plants over multiple locations with plants grown under optimal production management practices and maximum weed and pest control. A useful target for improved yield is a 5% to 10% increase in yield as compared to yield produced by plants grown from seed for a control plant. Selection methods may be applied in multiple and diverse geographic locations and over one or more planting seasons to statistically distinguish yield improvement from natural environmental effects.
Transgenic maize plants having enhanced water use efficiency are identified by screening plants in an assay where water is withheld for period to induce stress followed by watering to revive the plants. For example, a useful selection process imposes 3 drought/re-water cycles on plants over a total period of 15 days after an initial stress free growth period of 11 days. Each cycle consists of 5 days, with no water being applied for the first four days and a water quenching on the 5th day of the cycle. The primary phenotypes analyzed by the selection method are the changes in plant growth rate as determined by height and biomass during a vegetative drought treatment.
Transgenic maize plants having enhanced cold tolerance are identified by screening plants in a cold germination assay and/or a cold tolerance field trial. In a cold germination assay trays of transgenic and control seeds are placed in a dark growth chamber at 9.7 degrees Celsius for 24 days. Seeds having higher germination rates as compared to the control are identified as having enhanced cold tolerance. In a cold tolerance field trial plants with enhanced cold tolerance are identified from field planting at an earlier date than conventional spring planting for the field location. For example, seeds are planted into the ground around two weeks before local farmers begin to plant maize so that a significant cold stress is exerted onto the crop. As a control, seeds also are planted under local optimal planting conditions such that the crop has little or no exposure to cold condition. At each location, seeds are planted under both cold and normal conditions preferably with multiple repetitions per treatment.
The foregoing description and the examples presented in this disclosure describe the subject matter of this invention, which includes the following: (I) a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment; (II) a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment, wherein said processing of DNA to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA comprises transcription of said DNA to an RNA intermediate comprising one or more double-stranded RNA stems; (III) a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment, wherein length of said single-stranded RNA comprises between about 10 to about 100 nucleotides; (IV) a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment, further comprising at least one element selected from the group consisting of: (A) promoter functional in a eukaryotic cell; (B) a Pol III promoter operably linked to said DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA; (C) DNA that is processed to an RNA aptamer; (D) a transgene transcription unit; (E) DNA encoding a spliceable intron; (F) DNA encoding a self-splicing ribozyme; (G) DNA encoding a site-specific recombinase recognition site; (H) DNA encoding a gene suppression element; and (I) DNA encoding a transcription regulatory element; (V) a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment, wherein said at least one target gene comprises: (A) coding sequence, non-coding sequence, or both coding and non-coding sequence; or (B) a single target gene, or multiple target genes; or (C) one or more of the group consisting of: (1) an endogenous gene of a eukaryote, (2) a transgene of a transgenic plant, (3) an endogenous gene of a pest or pathogen of a plant, and (4) an endogenous gene of a symbiont associated with a pest or pathogen of a plant; (VI) a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment, wherein said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript: (A) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of said at least one target gene; or (B) inhibits translation of said transcript; (VII) a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment, wherein said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript: (A) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of said at least one target gene; or (B) inhibits translation of said transcript; and wherein: (1) said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of said at least one target gene and the length of said hybridized segment comprises between about 10 to about 100 base pairs; (2) said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript inhibits translation of said transcript and the length of said hybridized segment comprises between about 10 to about 50 base pairs; or (3) said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript inhibits translation of said transcript and the length of said hybridized segment comprises between about 19 to about 50 base pairs, said hybridized segment comprises smaller segments of 9 or fewer contiguous, perfectly complementary base pairs, and at least one mismatch or insertion is between each pair of said smaller segments; (VIII) a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment, wherein said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript: (A) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of said at least one target gene; or (B) inhibits translation of said transcript; and wherein said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of said at least one target gene and the length of said hybridized segment comprises between about 10 to about 100 base pairs, and said double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression comprises cleavage of said transcript by said RNase III ribonuclease, and said cleavage is mediated by binding of a small RNA to said transcript; (IX) a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment, wherein said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript: (A) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of said at least one target gene; or (B) inhibits translation of said transcript; and wherein said small RNA is: (1) an endogenous small RNA or a transgenic small RNA; or (2) selected from the group consisting of a miRNA, an siRNA, a trans-acting siRNA, a phased small RNA, a natural antisense transcript siRNA, and a natural antisense transcript miRNA; (X) a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment, wherein said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript: (A) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of said at least one target gene; or (B) inhibits translation of said transcript; and wherein said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of said at least one target gene and the length of said hybridized segment comprises between about 10 to about 100 base pairs, and said double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression comprises cleavage of said transcript by said RNase III ribonuclease, and said cleavage is mediated by binding of a small RNA to said transcript; and wherein said hybridized segment comprises at least one mismatch or at least one insertion in said hybridized segment at a position that results in inhibiting cleavage of said transcript by said RNase III ribonuclease; (XI) a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment, wherein said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript: (A) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of said at least one target gene; or (B) inhibits translation of said transcript; and wherein said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of said at least one target gene and the length of said hybridized segment comprises between about 10 to about 100 base pairs, and said double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression comprises cleavage of said transcript by said RNase III ribonuclease, and said cleavage is mediated by binding of a small RNA to said transcript; and wherein said small RNA is a mature miRNA, said binding is at a miRNA recognition site in said transcript, said cleavage of said transcript occurs at said miRNA recognition site, and said hybridized segment is formed at least partially within said miRNA recognition site; (XII) a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment, wherein said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript: (A) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of said at least one target gene; or (B) inhibits translation of said transcript; and wherein said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of said at least one target gene and the length of said hybridized segment comprises between about 10 to about 100 base pairs, and said double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression comprises cleavage of said transcript by said RNase III ribonuclease, and said cleavage is mediated by binding of a small RNA to said transcript; and wherein said small RNA is a mature miRNA, said binding is at a miRNA recognition site in said transcript, said cleavage of said transcript occurs at said miRNA recognition site, and said hybridized segment is formed at least partially within said miRNA recognition site; and wherein said hybridized segment comprises: (1) at least one mismatch between said single-stranded RNA and said miRNA recognition site at positions corresponding to positions 9, 10, or 11 of said mature miRNA, or (2) at least one insertion at a position in said single-stranded RNA at positions corresponding to positions 10-11 of said mature miRNA, or (3) an A, G, or C (but not a U) at a position corresponding to the 5′ terminus of said mature miRNA, but does not include (a) mismatches between said single-stranded RNA and said miRNA recognition site at positions of said miRNA recognition site corresponding to positions 9, 10, or 11 (in 3′ to 5′ direction) of said mature miRNA, or (b) insertions at a position in said single-stranded RNA at positions of said miRNA recognition site corresponding to positions 10 or 11 (in 3′ to 5′ direction) of said mature miRNA; (XIII) a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment, wherein said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript: (A) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of said at least one target gene; or (B) inhibits translation of said transcript; and wherein said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript inhibits translation of said transcript, and said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript occurs: (i) at least partially within the 5′ untranslated region or 3′ untranslated region of said transcript; or (ii) within or in the vicinity of the start codon or of the 5′ cap; (XIV) a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment, wherein said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript: (A) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of said at least one target gene; or (B) inhibits translation of said transcript; and wherein said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript inhibits translation of said transcript, and said hybridized segment is resistant to cleavage by said RNase III ribonuclease; (XV) a method of modulating expression of a target gene, comprising expressing in a cell a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment; (XVI) a method of modulating expression of a target gene, comprising expressing in a cell a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment; and wherein said binding of said single-stranded RNA to said transcript: (A) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of said at least one target gene, thereby increasing expression of said target gene; or (B) inhibits translation of said transcript, thereby decreasing expression of said target gene; (XVII) a non-natural plant chromosome or plastid comprising a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment; (XVIII) a non-natural transgenic plant cell having in its genome a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment, or a non-natural transgenic plant or a non-natural transgenic plant seed or a non-natural transgenic pollen grain comprising said non-natural transgenic plant cell; (XIX) a non-natural partially transgenic plant comprising: (A) a non-natural transgenic plant cell having in its genome a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment and further comprising non-transgenic tissue: or (B) a transgenic rootstock comprising a non-natural transgenic plant cell having in its genome a recombinant DNA construct comprising DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA comprising single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to said transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of said hybridized segment and further comprising a non-transgenic scion; (XX) a recombinant DNA construct transcribable in a plant cell, comprising a promoter that is functional in said plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide selected from: (A) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (B) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (C) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (D) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (E) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3, wherein a miRNA recognition site in said native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (F) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (G) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; and (H) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (XXI) a recombinant DNA construct transcribable in a plant cell, comprising a promoter that is functional in said plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide selected from: (A) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (B) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (C) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (D) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (E) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3, wherein a miRNA recognition site in said native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (F) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (G) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; and (H) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; and wherein said at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3 is at least one selected from the group consisting of a miR156 target, a miR160 target, a miR164 target, a miR166 target, a miR167 target, a miR169 target, a miR171 target, a miR172 target, a miR319 target, miR395 target, a miR396 target, a a miR398 target, a miR399 target, a miR408 target, a miR444 target, a miR528 target, a miR167g target, a miR169g target, COP1 (constitutive photomorphogenesis1), GA2ox (gibberellic acid 2 oxidase), GA20ox (gibberellic acid 20 oxidase), HB2 (homeobox 2), HB2-4 (homeobox 2 and homeobox 4), HB4 (homeobox 4), LG1 (liguleless1), SPX (SYG1, PHO81 and XPR1 domain; PFAM entry PF03105 at www.sanger.ac.uk), VIM1a (variant in methlylation 1a), DHS1 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS2 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS3 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS4 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS5 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS6 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS7 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS8 (deoxyhypusine synthase), CRF (corn RING finger; RNF169), G1543a (maize orthologue of Arabidopsis thaliana homeobox 17), G1543b (maize orthologue of Arabidopsis thaliana homeobox 17), GS3 (grain size 3), and GW2 (grain weight 2); (XXII) a recombinant DNA construct transcribable in a plant cell, comprising a promoter that is functional in said plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide selected from: (A) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (B) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (C) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (D) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (E) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3, wherein a miRNA recognition site in said native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (F) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (G) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; and (H) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; and wherein said at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3 is at least one selected from the group consisting of a miR156 target, a miR160 target, a miR164 target, a miR166 target, a miR167 target, a miR169 target, a miR171 target, a miR172 target, a miR319 target, miR395 target, a miR396 target, a a miR398 target, a miR399 target, a miR408 target, a miR444 target, a miR528 target, a miR167g target, a miR169g target, COP1 (constitutive photomorphogenesis1), GA2ox (gibberellic acid 2 oxidase), GA20ox (gibberellic acid 20 oxidase), HB2 (homeobox 2), HB2-4 (homeobox 2 and homeobox 4), HB4 (homeobox 4), LG1 (liguleless1), SPX (SYG1, PHO81 and XPR1 domain; PFAM entry PF03105 at www.sanger.ac.uk), VIM1a (variant in methlylation 1a), DHS1 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS2 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS3 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS4 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS5 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS6 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS7 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS8 (deoxyhypusine synthase), CRF (corn RING finger; RNF169), G1543a (maize orthologue of Arabidopsis thaliana homeobox 17), G1543b (maize orthologue of Arabidopsis thaliana homeobox 17), GS3 (grain size 3), and GW2 (grain weight 2); and wherein said at least one polynucleotide is at least one selected from the group consisting of DNA encoding a nucleotide sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 1120, 1121, 1122, 1248, 1257, 1313, 1314, 1364, 1387, 1478, 1489, 1490, 1491, 1492, 1493, 1585, 1597, 1598, 1599, 1713, 1752, 1753, 1801, 1802, 1820, 1927, 1929, 1931, 1971, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, 2022, 2023, 2025, 2027, 2029, 2031, 2033, 2035, 2037, 2039, 2041, 2043, 2045, 2047, 2049, 2051, 2053, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2059, 2060, 2061, and 2063; and (XXIII) a recombinant DNA construct transcribable in a plant cell, comprising a promoter that is functional in said plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide selected from: (A) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (B) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (C) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (D) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (E) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3, wherein a miRNA recognition site in said native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (F) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (G) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; and (H) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; amd wherein said recombinant DNA construct is stably integrated into a plastid or a chromosome of said plant cell.
This example illustrates the making and using of a “cleavage blocker” recombinant DNA construct including DNA that undergoes processing to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of at least one target gene to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment, wherein the binding of the single-stranded RNA to the transcript (and the resultant formation of the hybridized segment) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of a target gene. More specifically, this example describes constructs for producing in planta an artificial or engineered miRNA or a cleavage blocker and use of the cleavage blocker to inhibit miRNA-mediated suppression of an Arabidopsis GL1 gene in transformed plant cells.
Target gene: The Arabidopsis GLABROUS1 (GL1) gene is required for trichome synthesis; GL1 mutants lack leaf trichomes. GL1 is encoded by the DNA sequence ATGAGAATAAGGAGAAGAGATGAAAAAGAGAATCAAGAATACAAGAAAGGTTTATGGACA GTTGAAGAAGACAACATCCTTATGGACTATGTTCTTAATCATGGCACTGGCCAATGGAACCG CATCGTCAGAAAAACTGGGCTAAAGAGATGTGGGAAAAGTTGTAGACTGAGATGGATGAAT TATTTGAGCCCTAATGTGAACAAAGGCAATTTCACTGAACAAGAAGAAGACCTCATTATTCG TCTCCACAAGCTCCTCGGCAATAGATGGTCTTTGATAGCTAAAAGAGTACCGGGAAGAACA GATAACCAAGTCAAGAACTACTGGAACACTCATCTCAGCAAAAAACTCGTCGGAGATTACT CCTCCGCCGTCAAAACCACCGGAGAAGACGACGACTCTCCACCGTCATTGTTCATCACTGCC GCCACACCTTCTTCTTGTCATCATCAACAAGAAAATATCTACGAGAATATAGCCAAGAGCTT TAACGGCGTCGTATCAGCTTCGTACGAGGATAAACCAAAACAAGAACTGGCTCAAAAAGAT GTCCTAATGGCAACTACTAATGATCCAAGTCACTATTATGGCAATAACGCTTTATGGGTTCA TGACGACGATTTTGAGCTTAGTTCACTCGTAATGATGAATTTTGCTTCTGGTGATGTTGAGTA CTGCCTTTAG (SEQ ID NO: 1), includes a miRNA recognition site, which has the sequence CTCCACCGTCATTGTTCATCA (SEQ ID NO: 2) and which is also indicated by the underlined text at nucleotide positions 404 to 424 of SEQ ID NO: 1.
MicroRNA: Selected as a scaffold or initial sequence for designing an artificial miRNA was DNA derived from a soybean“miRMON1” precursor having the sequence AATTCATTACATTGATAAAACACAATTCAAAAGATCAATGTTCCACTTCATGCAAAGACATT TCCAAAATATGTGTAGGTAGAGGGGTTTTACAGGATCGTCCTGAGACCAAATGAGCAGCTG ACCACATGATGCAGCTATGTTTGCTATTCAGCTGCTCATCTGTTCTCAGGTCGCCCTTGTTGG ACTGTCCAACTCCTACTGATTGCGGATGCACTTGCCACAAATGAAAATCAAAGCGAGGGGA AAAGAATGTAGAGTGTGACTACGATTGCATGCATGTGATTTAGGTAATTAAGTTACATGATT GTCTAATTGTGTTTATGGAATTGTATA (SEQ ID NO: 3), where nucleotides of the mature miRNA (“miRMON1”) are indicated by underlined text at nucleotide positions 104 to 124 of SEQ ID NO: 3. The encoded transcript was predicted to have the fold-back structure depicted in
DNA encoding an engineered “miRGL1” miRNA precursor derived from SEQ ID NO: 3 was designed to produce an engineered miRGL1 precursor transcript that is processed to an artificial “miRGL1” mature miRNA for suppressing the Arabidopsis endogenous gene, GL1. The miRGL1 precursor had the sequence AATTCATTACATTGATAAAACACAATTCAAAAGATCAATGTTCCACTTCATGCAAAGACATT TCCAAAATATGTGTAGGTAGAGGGGTTTTACAGGATCGTCCTGATGAACAATGACGGTGGA GCCACATGATGCAGCTATGTTTGCTATCTCCACCGTCATCGTCCATCAGGTCGCCCTTGTTGGA CTGTCCAACTCCTACTGATTGCGGATGCACTTGCCACAAATGAAAATCAAAGCGAGGGGAA AAGAATGTAGAGTGTGACTACGATTGCATGCATGTGATTTAGGTAATTAAGTTACATGATTG TCTAATTGTGTTTATGGAATTGTATA (SEQ ID NO: 5), where nucleotides of the mature miRNA (“miRGL1”) are indicated by underlined text at nucleotide positions 104 to 124 of SEQ ID NO: 5 and nucleotides of the corresponding opposite strand designated miRNA* (“miRGL1*”) are indicated by italicized text at nucleotide positions 151 to 171 of SEQ ID NO: 5. This miRGL1 precursor was predicted to have the fold-back structure depicted in
Cleavage Blocker: DNA encoding a cleavage blocker (“miRGL1-CB”) precursor derived from SEQ ID NO: 3 was designed to transcribe to an engineered “cleavage blocker”-type miRNA precursor that is processed to an RNA including single-stranded RNA that binds to the transcript of the target gene GL1 to form a hybridized segment of at least partially double-stranded RNA that imparts to the GL1 transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment, wherein the binding of the single-stranded RNA to the transcript (and the resultant formation of the hybridized segment) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated suppression of the at least one target gene, wherein the suppression is mediated by miRGL1. The miRGL1-CB precursor had the sequence AATTCATTACATTGATAAAACACAATTCAAAAGATCAATGTTCCACTTCATGCAAAGACATT TCCAAAATATGTGTAGGTAGAGGGGTTTTACAGGATCGTCCTGATGAACATAGACGGTGGA GCCACATGATGCAGCTATGTTTGCTATCTCCACCGTCTACGTCCATCAGGTCGCCCTTGTTGGA CTGTCCAACTCCTACTGATTGCGGATGCACTTGCCACAAATGAAAATCAAAGCGAGGGGAA AAGAATGTAGAGTGTGACTACGATTGCATGCATGTGATTTAGGTAATTAAGTTACATGATTG TCTAATTGTGTTTATGGAATTGTATA (SEQ ID NO: 7), where nucleotides of the mature cleavage blocker (“miRGL1-CB”) are indicated by underlined text at nucleotide positions 104 to 124 of SEQ ID NO: 7 and nucleotides of the corresponding opposite strand miRNA* (“miRGL1-CB*”) are indicated by italicized text at nucleotide positions 151 to 171 of SEQ ID NO: 7. Nucleotides at positions 113 and 114 of SEQ ID NO: 7 are indicated by bold underlined text and correspond to positions 10 and 11 (in 3′ to 5′ direction) of the mature miRGL1-CB1; these two nucleotides were selected to be intentionally mismatched to nucleotides of the miRNA recognition site (SEQ ID NO: 2) of GL1 (SEQ ID NO: 1) to prevent cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease. The encoded miRGL1-CB RNA precursor was predicted to have the fold-back structure depicted in
miRGL1 Sensor: DNA encoding a “miRGL1-sensor” having the sequence TccagctgctcatttggtctcaTGATCACTGCGGCCGCAATACAgccatagatcacttgatgtcaCGAccaccgtcattgttcatcagatttctctctgcaagcg (SEQ ID NO: 9) was designed to include an artificial miRGL1 recognition site having the sequence GACCACCGTCATTGTTCATCA (SEQ ID NO: 10), which is also indicated by underlined text at nucleotide positions 67 and 87 of SEQ ID NO: 9. Nucleotides at positions 67 and 68 of SEQ ID NO: 9 (or nucleotides at positions 1 and 2 of SEQ ID NO: 10) are indicated by bold underlined text and correspond to positions 1 and 2 (in 3′ to 5′ direction) of the mature miRGL1; these two nucleotides were selected to be intentionally mismatched to the last two nucleotides on the 3′ end of the mature miRGL1 (SEQ ID NO: 6) to prevent transitivity.
Three plasmids for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were constructed:
An aspect of this invention was demonstrated using protocols described in Kościańska et al. (2005) Plant Mol. Biol., 59:647-661). Nicotiana benthamiana plants were transiently transformed using Agrobacterium with various combinations of these plasmids and, where necessary, “filler” (null plasmid) Agrobacterium to ensure infiltration of equal amounts of Agrobacterium.
Nicotiana benthamiana plants transformed with plasmid (2) exhibited GFP (green) fluorescence when visualized under UV light. In plants transformed with plasmids (1) and (2), GFP fluorescence was abolished with only chlorophyll (red) fluorescence observed under UV light, indicating that the mature miRGL1 microRNA suppressed expression of GFP. In plants transformed with plasmids (1), (2) and (3), GFP fluorescence was restored, indicating that the miRGL1-CB cleavage blocker inhibited double-stranded RNA-mediated (i.e., mRGL1-mediated) suppression of the target gene GFP by protecting the miRGL1 recognition site from being cleaved by the mature miRGL1, resulting in increased expression (fluorescence) of the target gene GFP relative to its expression in the absence of the cleavage blocker.
In another demonstration of this invention, stably transformed Arabidopsis thaliana plants were produced by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation with a plasmid expressing a miRGL1 precursor (SEQ ID NO: 5), which is processed in planta to a “miRGL1” mature miRNA for suppressing the Arabidopsis endogenous gene, GL1. The resulting transformed Arabidopsis plants exhibited leaves without trichomes, indicating suppression of the target gene GLABROUS1. Arabidopsis plants homozygous for miRGL1 DNA are further transformed with a plasmid expressing a miRGL1-CB precursor (SEQ ID NO: 7) and selected using kanamycin resistance. In these double transformant plants, in planta expression of the mature cleavage blocker miRGL1-CB (in 3′ to 5′ direction, SEQ ID NO: 8) inhibits double-stranded RNA-mediated (i.e., mRGL1-mediated) suppression of the target gene GLABROUS1 (GL1) by protecting the miRGL1 recognition site from being cleaved by the mature miRGL1, resulting in restoration of trichome production (indicating increased expression of the target gene GL1 relative to its expression in the absence of the cleavage blocker).
This example illustrates an alternative “cleavage blocker” recombinant DNA construct having modification at a position corresponding to the 5′ terminus of the mature miRNA that natively binds to the recognition site of the target gene, i.e., a “5′-modified cleavage blocker” that is transgenically produced in planta and a method of use of this cleavage blocker to inhibit miRNA-mediated suppression of a target gene in transformed plant cells.
In one example, DNA encoding an artificial miRNA (miRGL1) precursor (SEQ ID NO: 6) was modified by a single nucleotide change (changing the 5′ terminus of the mature miRGL1 from a U to a C) to yield the 5′-modified cleavage blocker precursor sequence AATTCATTACATTGATAAAACACAATTCAAAAGATCAATGTTCCACTTCATGCAAAGACATT TCCAAAATATGTGTAGGTAGAGGGGTTTTACAGGATCGTCCCGATGAACAATGACGGTGGA GCCACATGATGCAGCTATGTTTGCTATCTCCACCGTCATCGTCCATCGGGTCGCCCTTGTTGG ACTGTCCAACTCCTACTGATTGCGGATGCACTTGCCACAAATGAAAATCAAAGCGAGGGGA AAAGAATGTAGAGTGTGACTACGATTGCATGCATGTGATTTAGGTAATTAAGTTACATGATT GTCTAATTGTGTTTATGGAATTGTATA (SEQ ID NO: 11), where nucleotides of the mature 5′-modified cleavage blocker are indicated by underlined text at nucleotide positions 104 to 124 of SEQ ID NO: 11 (for comparison, nucleotides of SEQ ID NO: 11 that correspond to miRGL1* nucleotides in SEQ ID NO: 6 are indicated by italicized text at nucleotide positions 151 to 171 of SEQ ID NO: 11). This 5′-modified cleavage blocker RNA precursor was predicted to have the fold-back structure depicted in
Two 5′-modified variants of the miRGL1-CB precursor (SEQ ID NO: 7) were made, wherein the position corresponding to the 5′ terminus of the mature miRGL1-CB was changed from a T to an A or from a T to a C, respectively, but wherein the mismatches corresponding to positions 10 or 11 (in 3′ to 5′ direction) of the mature miRGL1 were preserved. Both variants were predicted to have a fold-back structure (not shown) similar to those shown in
The “5′-C variant” (SEQ ID NO: 14) was transiently transfected into Nicotiana benthaminiana (using procedures similar to those of Example 2); co-inoculation of the “5′-C” variant and 35S/miRGL1-sensor/Term (without miRGL1) resulted in GFP fluorescence, indicating that the “5′-C variant” was unable to cleave the miRGL1 recognition site and did not have miRNA-like activity.
Both the “5′-A variant” (SEQ ID NO: 13) (plasmid pMON115363) and the “5′-C variant” (SEQ ID NO: 14) (plasmid pMON115349) were tested using transient transfection of Nicotiana benthaminiana (similar to the experiment described in Example 2), and found to also inhibit miRGL1-mediated suppression of the target gene GFP, although not to as great an extent as the original cleavage blocker miRGL1-CB (SEQ ID NO: 7).
The above example serves as guidance in making and using a cleavage blocker (or 5′-modified cleavage blocker) useful for inhibiting miRNA-mediated suppression of a target gene. It is clear to one of ordinary skill in the art that knowledge of the target gene itself is not required, merely the sequence of the mature miRNA sequence or of a miRNA precursor that is processed to the mature miRNA—or, alternatively, knowledge of the miRNA recognition site sequence—in combination with the teachings of this application, in order to devise a cleavage blocker (or 5′-modified cleavage blocker) to inhibit the target gene silencing effects of a given miRNA.
Thus, this application further provides and claims novel cleavage blockers and 5′-modified cleavage blockers for all miRNA sequences that have been publicly disclosed, including, but not limited to, the miRNAs available at miRBase (microrna.sanger.ac.uk), and the mature miRNAs and miRNA precursors disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/303,745 (published as U.S. Patent Application Publication 2006/0200878), 11/974,469 (published as U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009-0070898 A1), 11/868,081 (published as U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/0115240), 10/884,374 (published as U.S. Patent Application Publication 2005/0144669), and 10/490,955 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,232,806), which patent application disclosures including the respective sequence listings are specifically incorporated by reference herein.
This example provides embodiments of target genes identified as “validated miRNA targets” (i.e., containing a validated miRNA recognition site). Recombinant DNA constructs of this invention are useful for modulating expression of such target genes and for making non-natural transgenic plant cells, plant tissues, and plants (especially non-natural transgenic crop plants) having improved yield or other desirable traits.
Prediction of a recognition site is achieved using methods known in the art, such as sequence complementarity rules as described by Zhang (2005) Nucleic Acids Res., 33:W701-704 and by Rhoades et al. (2002) Cell, 110:513-520. One method to experimentally validate predicted miRNA recognition sites is the technique known as RNA ligase-mediated rapid amplification of cDNA 5′ ends (“5′ RLM-RACE” or “5′ RACE”), which identifies miRNA cleavage patterns; see, for example, Kasschau et al. (2003) Dev. Cell, 4:205-217, and Llave et al. (2002) Science, 297:2053-2056. This approach relies on ligation of an RNA adapter molecule to the 5′ end of the cleavage site and is dependent on the 5′ phosphate left by RNase III enzymes including Ago 1. The resulting PCR products are sequenced and the relative number of clones which align to the predicted miRNA cleavage site between nucleotides 10 and 11 relative to the miRNA 5′ end provide an estimate of miRNA activity.
While the standard for validation of a predicted miRNA target is experimental verification of the predicted cleavage, computational validation is also extremely useful for providing a set of potential target genes that is of manageable or practical size. At least two computational validation approaches based on homology of miRNAs and predicted miRNA targets can be used. One approach compares the predicted targets with experimentally verified targets; the predicted target is computationally validated if it is homologous to an experimentally validated target. This approach is expected to identify miRNA targets with high confidence and to become increasingly important as more experimentally validated targets become available. The second approach compares sequences from two species when no known miRNA target information is available. If both miRNAs and predicted miRNA targets are conserved in both species, then predicted targets in both species are deemed validated.
In this example, the first approach was used, wherein computational validation of predicted miRNA targets was based on homology of predicted targets and known targets. A list of experimentally verified plant miRNA target genes was created through mining the literature on miRNA targets from rice (Sunkar et al. (2005) Plant Cell, 17:1397-1411; Luo et al. (2006) FEBS Lett., 580:5111-5116), moss (Physcomitrella patens) (Axtell et al. (2007) Plant Cell, 19:1750-1769; Fattash et al. (2007) BMC Plant Biol., 7:13), poplar (Lu et al. (2005) Plant Cell, 17:2186-2203), green algae (Molnár et al. (2007) Nature, 447:1126-1130), and maize (Lauter et al. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102:9412-9417). To this list were added 203 Arabidopsis thaliana loci from the publicly accessible Arabidopsis Small RNA Project (available on line at asrp.cgrb.oregonstate.edu/db/microRNAfamily.html). From this list, a gene function keyword “dictionary” from the available functional annotation was compiled, including known keyword variants (Table 1).
Any functional annotation of a given predicted miRNA target was searched for a match to the dictionary's keywords. A computational algorithm was developed to match the longest keyword first, second longest keyword second, and so on, to reduce false positives in keyword match. Where a match was found, the predicted target was deemed validated. This approach was applied to miRNA targets that had been predicted from proprietary sequence databases from various plant species; the computationally validated miRNA targets thus identified are given in Table 2.
Identification of validated miRNA targets allows the manipulation of the interaction between a given miRNA and its target gene (whether a native gene or a transgene that contains a validated miRNA recognition site). For example, over-expression of a target gene containing a validated miRNA target (validated miRNA recognition site) is expected to reduce the effect of that particular miRNA in the biochemical network or networks involving the miRNA.
Alternatively, an artificial transcript that includes the same miRNA target sequence (or one modified to prevent cleavage by an RNase II ribonuclease) can be used as a miRNA “decoy” (as described in co-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/974,469, published as U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009-0070898 A1, which disclosure is specifically incorporated by reference herein), competing with the endogenous target gene to bind to that particular miRNA and thereby reducing the effect of the miRNA (e.g., suppression of the target gene and reduction of the effect of the miRNA on other genes downstream of the target gene) in the biochemical network or networks involving the miRNA. Knowledge of the validated miRNA targets disclosed herein allows one of ordinary skill in the art to use the miRNA target sequences as scaffolds for designing artificial sequences useful as transgenic miRNA decoys to reduce the effect of the miRNA on its target gene(s), or to identify endogenous sequences that are similarly useful as miRNA decoys. Thus, this application further provides and claims miRNA decoys for the validated miRNA targets disclosed herein, as well as miRNA decoys for all miRNA sequences that have been publicly disclosed, including, but not limited to, the miRNAs available at miRBase (microrna.sanger.ac.uk), and the mature miRNAs and miRNA precursors disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/303,745 (published as U.S. Patent Application Publication 2006/0200878), 11/974,469 (published as U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009-0070898 A1), 11/868,081 (published as U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/0115240), 10/884,374 (published as U.S. Patent Application Publication 2005/0144669), and 10/490,955 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,232,806), which specifications are specifically incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.
In yet another embodiment, this invention further provides a miRNA-unresponsive transgene by modifying the sequence of a validated miRNA recognition site in the transgene to prevent binding and/or cleavage by that particular miRNA. In one example, increased expression of a gene that is normally modulated by an endogenous miRNA may be achieved by expressing a recombinant DNA construct encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of the gene but wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage. In still another embodiment, this invention provides a transgene sequence that is modified by the addition of a validated miRNA recognition site in order to place that transgene under the control of that particular miRNA; in a variation on this, a transgenic plant is made by introducing into its genome both the transgene as well as an exogenous precursor of the particular miRNA that is to regulate the transgene.
Apetala, AP2, TOE1, TOE2, TOE3, SMZ, SNZ, Target of EAT, TOE, Schnarchzapfen,
Apetala floral homeotic protein, Apetala protein, APETALA2
Arabidopsis
thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
A. thaliana
napus or Brassica
rapa)
Brassica
campestris)
Glycine max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
G. max
Gossypium
hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
G. hirsutum
Hordeum vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
H. vulgare
Medicago sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
M. sativa
Oryza sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
O. sativa
Physcomitrella
patens
Sorghum bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
S. bicolor
Triticum aestivum
T. aestivum
T. aestivum
T. aestivum
T. aestivum
T. aestivum
T. aestivum
T. aestivum
T. aestivum
T. aestivum
Zea mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
Z. mays
This example provides additional embodiments of target genes identified as “validated miRNA targets” (i.e., containing a validated miRNA recognition site) and representative uses of validated miRNA recognition sites, e.g., for the design of artificial sequences useful in making recombinant DNA constructs, including, but not limited to, transgenes with an exogenous miRNA recognition site added, transgenes with a native miRNA recognition site modified or deleted, decoys, cleavage blockers, or translational inhibitors as taught and claimed by Applicants. Recombinant DNA constructs of this invention are useful for modulating expression of such target genes and for making non-natural transgenic plant cells, plant tissues, and plants (especially non-natural transgenic crop plants) having improved yield or other desirable traits.
Table 3 provides a list of miRNAs and miRNA targets containing miRNA recognition sites that were identified in various plants using techniques similar to those described in Example 2. The miRNA targets were identified by gene name, protein domain, function, location, or simply as a gene having a miRNA recognition site; this information is sufficient for designing artificial sequences including miRNA-unresponsive transgenes, cleavage blockers, 5′-modified cleavage blockers, translational inhibitors, and miRNA decoys. Table 3 further provides a list of miRNA precursors (designed to be processed to a native mature miRNA), as well as artificial sequences including miRNA precursors designed to be processed to a synthetic mature miRNA, miRNA decoys, miRNA-unresponsive transgenes, and miRNA cleavage blockers, all of which are especially useful in making recombinant DNA constructs of this invention. One of ordinary skill in the art, informed by the teachings of this application and provided with the nucleotide sequence of a miRNA or a miRNA recognition site in a target gene, would be readily able to devise such artificial sequences. Such a person of ordinary skill would further recognize that knowledge of the target gene itself is not required, merely the sequence of the mature miRNA sequence or of a miRNA precursor that is processed to the mature miRNA—or, alternatively, knowledge of the miRNA recognition site sequence—in combination with the teachings of this application, in order to devise a cleavage blocker (or 5′-modified cleavage blocker) to inhibit the target gene silencing effects of a given miRNA. Table 3 also provides examples of recombinant DNA constructs which, when transgenically expressed in a crop plant (preferably, but not limited to, maize or corn, soybean, canola, cotton, alfalfa, sugarcane, sugar beet, sorghum, and rice), results in improved yield by that crop plant, when compared to the crop plant in which the construct is not expressed. Techniques for making transgenic plants are described under the heading “Making and Using Transgenic Plant Cells and Transgenic Plants”. “Improved yield” can be increased intrinsic yield; in other embodiments, improved yield is yield increased under a particular growing condition, such as abiotic or biotic stress conditions (e.g., heat or cold stress, drought stress, or nutrient stress), when compared to a crop lacking expression of the recombinant DNA construct of this invention.
With the above information about miRNA targets, one of ordinary skill in the art is able to make and use various additional embodiments of aspects of this invention, including a recombinant DNA construct transcribable in a plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide selected from: (a) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (b) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (c) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (d) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (e) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3, wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (f) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (g) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; and (h) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3. Specifically claimed are embodiments wherein the recombinant DNA construct is stably integrated into a plastid or a chromosome of the plant cell. Also specifically claimed are methods to improve yield in a plant, wherein the recombinant DNA construct is transgenically expressed in a crop plant (preferably, but not limited to, maize or corn, soybean, canola, cotton, alfalfa, sugarcane, sugar beet, sorghum, and rice), resulting in improved yield by that crop plant, when compared to the crop plant in which the construct is not expressed.
Embodiments within the scope of this invention include a recombinant DNA construct transcribable in a plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide selected from: (a) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target; (b) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target; (c) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target; (d) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target; (e) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of at least one miRNA target, wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (f) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target; (g) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target; and (h) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target—wherein the at least one miRNA target is at least one selected from the group consisting of a miR156 target, a miR160 target, a miR164 target, a miR166 target, a miR167 target, a miR169 target, a miR171 target, a miR172 target, a miR319 target, miR395 target, a miR396 target, a a miR398 target, a miR399 target, a miR408 target, a miR444 target, a miR528 target, a miR167g target, a miR169g target, COP1 (constitutive photomorphogenesis1), GA2ox (gibberellic acid 2 oxidase), GA20ox (gibberellic acid 20 oxidase), HB2 (homeobox 2), HB2-4 (homeobox 2 and homeobox 4), HB4 (homeobox 4), LG1 (liguleless1), SPX (SYG1, PHO81 and XPR1 domain; PFAM entry PF03105 at www(dot)sanger(dot)ac(dot)uk), VIM1a (variant in methlylation 1a), DHS1 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS2 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS3 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS4 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS5 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS6 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS7 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS8 (deoxyhypusine synthase), CRF (corn RING finger; RNF169), G1543a (maize orthologue of Arabidopsis thaliana homeobox 17), G1543b (maize orthologue of Arabidopsis thaliana homeobox 17), GS3 (grain size 3), and GW2 (grain weight 2). Particular embodiments that are specifically claimed by this invention include a recombinant DNA construct transcribable in a plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide selected from the group consisting of DNA encoding a nucleotide sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 1120, 1121, 1122, 1248, 1257, 1313, 1314, 1364, 1387, 1478, 1489, 1490, 1491, 1492, 1493, 1585, 1597, 1598, 1599, 1713, 1752, 1753, 1801, 1802, 1820, 1927, 1929, 1931, 1971, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, 2022, 2023, 2025, 2027, 2029, 2031, 2033, 2035, 2037, 2039, 2041, 2043, 2045, 2047, 2049, 2051, 2053, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2059, 2060, 2061, and 2063; also specifically claimed are embodiments wherein the recombinant DNA construct is stably integrated into a plastid or a chromosome of the plant cell.
Further embodiments are methods to improve yield in a plant, wherein a recombinant DNA construct transcribable in a plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide selected from: (a) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target; (b) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target; (c) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target; (d) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target; (e) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of at least one miRNA target, wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (f) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target; (g) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target; and (h) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target—wherein the at least one miRNA target is at least one selected from the group consisting of a miR156 target, a miR160 target, a miR164 target, a miR166 target, a miR167 target, a miR169 target, a miR171 target, a miR172 target, a miR319 target, miR395 target, a miR396 target, a a miR398 target, a miR399 target, a miR408 target, a miR444 target, a miR528 target, a miR167g target, a miR169g target, COP1 (constitutive photomorphogenesis1), GA2ox (gibberellic acid 2 oxidase), GA20ox (gibberellic acid 20 oxidase), HB2 (homeobox 2), HB2-4 (homeobox 2 and homeobox 4), HB4 (homeobox 4), LG1 (liguleless1), SPX (SYG1, PHO81 and XPR1 domain; PFAM entry PF03105 at www(dot)sanger(dot)ac(dot)uk), VIM1a (variant in methlylation 1a), DHS1 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS2 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS3 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS4 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS5 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS6 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS7 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS8 (deoxyhypusine synthase), CRF (corn RING finger; RNF169), G1543a (maize orthologue of Arabidopsis thaliana homeobox 17), G1543b (maize orthologue of Arabidopsis thaliana homeobox 17), GS3 (grain size 3), and GW2 (grain weight 2)—is transgenically expressed in a crop plant (preferably, but not limited to, maize or corn, soybean, canola, cotton, alfalfa, sugarcane, sugar beet, sorghum, and rice), resulting in improved yield by that crop plant, when compared to the crop plant in which the construct is not expressed. Specifically claimed are methods to improve yield in a plant, wherein a recombinant DNA construct transcribable in a plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide selected from the group consisting of DNA encoding a nucleotide sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 1120, 1121, 1122, 1248, 1257, 1313, 1314, 1364, 1387, 1478, 1489, 1490, 1491, 1492, 1493, 1585, 1597, 1598, 1599, 1713, 1752, 1753, 1801, 1802, 1820, 1927, 1929, 1931, 1971, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, 2022, 2023, 2025, 2027, 2029, 2031, 2033, 2035, 2037, 2039, 2041, 2043, 2045, 2047, 2049, 2051, 2053, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2059, 2060, 2061, and 2063 is transgenically expressed in a crop plant (preferably, but not limited to, maize or corn, soybean, canola, cotton, alfalfa, sugarcane, sugar beet, sorghum, and rice), resulting in improved yield by that crop plant, when compared to the crop plant in which the construct is not expressed.
Additional aspects of this invention include a non-natural transgenic plant cell including a stably integrated recombinant DNA construct transcribable in the non-natural transgenic plant cell, wherein the recombinant DNA construct includes a promoter functional in the non-natural transgenic plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide selected from DNA encoding at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; the recombinant DNA construct can be stably integrated into a plastid, a chromosome, or the genome of the plant cell. Embodiments include a non-natural transgenic plant cell including a stably integrated recombinant DNA construct transcribable in the non-natural transgenic plant cell, wherein the recombinant DNA construct includes a promoter functional in the non-natural transgenic plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide including a DNA sequence selected from SEQ ID NOS: 15-2064.
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Brassica
napus
Brassica
napus
Brassica
napus
Brassica
napus
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Brassica
napus
Brassica
napus
Brassica
oleracea
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Brassica
napus
Brassica
napus
Brassica
oleracea
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Sorghum
bicolor
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Brassica
napus
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Hordeum
vulgare
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Sorghum
bicolor
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Brassica
napus
Brassica
napus
Brassica
napus
Brassica
napus
Brassica
rapa
Brassica
oleracea
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Oryza
sativa
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Brassica
napus
Brassica
napus
Brassica
rapa
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Oryza
sativa
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Brassica
napus
Brassica
napus
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Brassica
napus
Brassica
napus
Brassica
napus
Brassica
rapa
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Brassica
napus
Brassica
napus
Brassica
napus
Brassica
rapa
Brassica
rapa
Brassica
rapa
Brassica
oleracea
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Brassica
napus
Glycine max
Glycine max
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Glycine max
Glycine max
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Triticum
aestivum
Zea mays
Zea mays
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Brassica
napus
Brassica
rapa
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Medicago
truncatula
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Oryza
sativa
Zea mays
Glycine max
Glycine max
Medicago
truncatula
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Sorghum
bicolor
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Glycine max
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Hordeum
vulgare
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Sorghum
bicolor
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Arabidopsis
thaliana
Brassica
napus
Brassica
rapa
Brassica
oleracea
Oryza
sativa
Oryza
sativa
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Glycine max
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Arabidopsis thaliana
Zea mays
Arabidopsis thaliana
Zea mays
Arabidopsis thaliana
Zea mays
Oryza
sativa
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
This example illustrates various aspects of the invention relating to transgenic plant cells and transgenic plants. More specifically, this example illustrates transformation vectors and techniques useful with different crop plants for providing non-natural transgenic plant cells, plants, and seeds having in their genome any of this invention's recombinant DNA constructs transcribable in a plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide as disclosed herein, including: (1) a recombinant DNA construct transcribable in a plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide selected from: (a) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (b) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (c) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (d) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (e) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3, wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (f) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (g) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; and (h) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; (2) a recombinant DNA construct transcribable in a plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide selected from: (a) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target; (b) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target; (c) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target; (d) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target; (e) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of at least one miRNA target, wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (f) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target; (g) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target; and (h) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of at least one miRNA target—wherein the at least one miRNA target is at least one selected from the group consisting of a miR156 target, a miR160 target, a miR164 target, a miR166 target, a miR167 target, a miR169 target, a miR171 target, a miR172 target, a miR319 target, miR395 target, a miR396 target, a a miR398 target, a miR399 target, a miR408 target, a miR444 target, a miR528 target, a miR167g target, a miR169g target, COP1 (constitutive photomorphogenesis1), GA2ox (gibberellic acid 2 oxidase), GA20ox (gibberellic acid 20 oxidase), HB2 (homeobox 2), HB2-4 (homeobox 2 and homeobox 4), HB4 (homeobox 4), LG1 (liguleless1), SPX (SYG1, PHO81 and XPR1 domain; PFAM entry PF03105 at www(dot)sanger(dot)ac(dot)uk), VIM1a (variant in methlylation 1a), DHS1 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS2 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS3 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS4 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS5 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS6 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS7 (deoxyhypusine synthase), DHS8 (deoxyhypusine synthase), CRF (corn RING finger; RNF169), G1543a (maize orthologue of Arabidopsis thaliana homeobox 17), G1543b (maize orthologue of Arabidopsis thaliana homeobox 17), GS3 (grain size 3), and GW2 (grain weight 2); (3) a recombinant DNA construct transcribable in a plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide selected from the group consisting of DNA encoding a nucleotide sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 1120, 1121, 1122, 1248, 1257, 1313, 1314, 1364, 1387, 1478, 1489, 1490, 1491, 1492, 1493, 1585, 1597, 1598, 1599, 1713, 1752, 1753, 1801, 1802, 1820, 1927, 1929, 1931, 1971, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, 2022, 2023, 2025, 2027, 2029, 2031, 2033, 2035, 2037, 2039, 2041, 2043, 2045, 2047, 2049, 2051, 2053, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2059, 2060, 2061, and 2063; (4) a recombinant DNA construct transcribable in a plant cell, including a promoter functional in the non-natural transgenic plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide selected from DNA encoding at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3; and (5) a recombinant DNA construct transcribable in a plant cell, including a promoter functional in the non-natural transgenic plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide including a DNA sequence selected from SEQ ID NOS: 15-2064). It is clear that the polynucleotide to be expressed using these recombinant DNA vectors in the non-natural transgenic plant cells, plants, and seeds can encode a transcript that prevents or decreases small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3 (including the specific miRNA targets identified by name in this paragraph), or a transcript that suppresses expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3 (including the specific miRNA targets identified by name in this paragraph), or a transcript encoding at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3, or encodes DNA sequence selected from SEQ ID NOS: 15-2064.
Transformation Vectors and Protocols
The following sections describe examples of a base vector for preparing transformation vectors including recombinant DNA constructs of this invention for transformation of a specific crop plant. The recombinant DNA constructs are transcribable in a plant cell and include a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to at least one polynucleotide, which encodes a transcript that prevents or decreases small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3 (including the specific miRNA targets identified by name in this paragraph), or a transcript that suppresses expression of at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3 (including the specific miRNA targets identified by name in this paragraph), or a transcript encoding at least one miRNA target identified in Tables 2 or 3, or encodes DNA sequence selected from SEQ ID NOS: 15-2064. Also provided are detailed examples of crop-specific transformation protocols for using these vectors including recombinant DNA constructs of this invention to generate a non-natural transgenic plant cell, non-natural transgenic tissue, or non-natural transgenic plant. Additional transformation techniques are known to one of ordinary skill in the art, as reflected in the “Compendium of Transgenic Crop Plants”, edited by Chittaranjan Kole and Timothy C. Hall, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2008; ISBN 978-1-405-16924-0 (available electronically at mrw(dot)interscience(dot)wiley(dot)com/emrw/9781405181099/hpt/toc). Such transformation methods are useful in producing a non-natural transgenic plant cell having a transformed nucleus. Non-natural transgenic plants, seeds, and pollen are subsequently produced from such a non-natural transgenic plant cell having a transformed nucleus, and screened for an enhanced trait (e.g., increased yield, enhanced water use efficiency, enhanced cold tolerance, enhanced nitrogen or phosphate use efficiency, enhanced seed protein, or enhanced seed oil, or any trait such as those disclosed above under the heading “Making and Using Transgenic Plant Cells and Transgenic Plants”).
Transformation of Maize
A base transformation vector pMON93039 (SEQ ID NO: 2065), illustrated in Table 4 and
For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of maize embryo cells, maize plants of a transformable line are grown in the greenhouse and ears are harvested when the embryos are 1.5 to 2.0 mm in length. Ears are surface sterilized by spraying or soaking the ears in 80% ethanol, followed by air drying. Immature embryos are isolated from individual kernels from sterilized ears. Prior to inoculation of maize cells, cultures of Agrobacterium each containing a transformation vector for expressing each of the recombinant DNA constructs of this invention are grown overnight at room temperature Immature maize embryo cells are inoculated with Agrobacterium after excision, incubated at room temperature with Agrobacterium for 5 to 20 minutes, and then co-cultured with Agrobacterium for 1 to 3 days at 23 degrees Celsius in the dark. Co-cultured embryos are transferred to a selection medium and cultured for approximately two weeks to allow embryogenic callus to develop. Embryogenic callus is transferred to a culture medium containing 100 mg/L paromomycin and subcultured at about two week intervals. Multiple events of transformed plant cells are recovered 6 to 8 weeks after initiation of selection.
Transgenic maize plants are regenerated from transgenic plant cell callus for each of the multiple transgenic events resulting from transformation and selection. The callus of transgenic plant cells of each event is placed on a medium to initiate shoot and root development into plantlets which are transferred to potting soil for initial growth in a growth chamber at 26 degrees Celsius, followed by growth on a mist bench before transplanting to pots where plants are grown to maturity. The regenerated plants are self-fertilized. First generation (“R1”) seed is harvested. The seed or plants grown from the seed is used to select seeds, seedlings, progeny second generation (“R2”) transgenic plants, or hybrids, e.g., by selecting transgenic plants exhibiting an enhanced trait as compared to a control plant (a plant lacking expression of the recombinant DNA construct).
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic maize plant cells that are transformed with separate recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a maize plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the maize plant cell and operably linked to each polynucleotide selected from: (a) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (b) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (c) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (d) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (e) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3, wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (f) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (g) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; and (h) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic maize plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a maize plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the maize plant cell and operably linked to a polynucleotide selected from: (a) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (b) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (c) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (d) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (e) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of the miRNA target, wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (f) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of the miRNA target; (g) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression the miRNA target; and (h) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of the miRNA target—wherein separate constructs are made for each of the miRNA targets enumerated in Table 5.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic maize plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a maize plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the maize plant cell and operably linked to each polynucleotide provided in Table 6, wherein separate constructs are made for each polynucleotide.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic maize plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a maize plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to a polynucleotide selected from DNA encoding each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic maize plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a maize plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to each polynucleotide of SEQ ID NOS: 15-2064.
The regenerated transgenic maize plants, or progeny transgenic maize plants or maize seeds, produced from the regenerated transgenic maize plants, are screened for an enhanced trait (e.g., increased yield), as compared to a control plant or seed (a plant or seed lacking expression of the recombinant DNA construct). From each group of multiple events of transgenic maize plants with a specific recombinant construct of this invention, the event that produces the greatest enhanced trait (e.g., greatest enhancement in yield) is identified and progeny maize seed is selected for commercial development.
Agrobacterium
tumefaciens Ti plasmid which functions to
Agrobacterium
E. coli plasmid ColE1.
Transformation of Soybean
A base transformation vector pMON82053 (SEQ ID NO: 2066), illustrated in Table 7 and
For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, soybean seeds are imbided overnight and the meristem explants excised and placed in a wounding vessel. Cultures of induced Agrobacterium cells each containing a transformation vector for expressing each of the recombinant DNA constructs of this invention are mixed with prepared explants. Inoculated explants are wounded using sonication, placed in co-culture for 2-5 days, and transferred to selection media for 6-8 weeks to allow selection and growth of transgenic shoots. Resistant shoots are harvested at approximately 6-8 weeks and placed into selective rooting media for 2-3 weeks. Shoots producing roots are transferred to the greenhouse and potted in soil.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic soybean plant cells that are transformed with separate recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a soybean plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the soybean plant cell and operably linked to each polynucleotide selected from: (a) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (b) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (c) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (d) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (e) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3, wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (f) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (g) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; and (h) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic soybean plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a soybean plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the soybean plant cell and operably linked to a polynucleotide selected from: (a) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (b) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (c) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (d) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (e) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of the miRNA target, wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (f) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of the miRNA target; (g) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression the miRNA target; and (h) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of the miRNA target—wherein separate constructs are made for each of the miRNA targets enumerated in Table 5.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic soybean plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a soybean plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the soybean plant cell and operably linked to each polynucleotide provided in Table 6, wherein separate constructs are made for each polynucleotide.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic soybean plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a soybean plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to a polynucleotide selected from DNA encoding each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic soybean plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a soybean plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to each polynucleotide of SEQ ID NOS: 15-2064.
The regenerated transgenic soybean plants, or progeny transgenic soybean plants or soybean seeds, produced from the regenerated transgenic soybean plants, are screened for an enhanced trait (e.g., increased yield), as compared to a control plant or seed (a plant or seed lacking expression of the recombinant DNA construct). From each group of multiple events of transgenic soybean plants with a specific recombinant construct of this invention, the event that produces the greatest enhanced trait (e.g., greatest enhancement in yield) is identified and progeny soybean seed is selected for commercial development.
Transformation of Canola
A base transformation vector pMON82053 (SEQ ID NO: 2066), illustrated in Table 7 and
Overnight-grown cultures of Agrobacterium cells each containing a transformation vector for expressing each of the recombinant DNA constructs of this invention are used to inoculate tissues from in vitro-grown canola seedlings. Following co-cultivation with Agrobacterium, the infected tissues are grown on selection to promote growth of transgenic shoots, followed by growth of roots from the transgenic shoots, potting of the selected plantlets in soil, and transfer of the potted plants to the greenhouse. Molecular characterization is performed to confirm the presence of a recombinant DNA construct of this invention and its expression in transgenic plants.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic canola plant cells that are transformed with separate recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a canola plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the canola plant cell and operably linked to each polynucleotide selected from: (a) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (b) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (c) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (d) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (e) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3, wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (f) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (g) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; and (h) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic canola plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a canola plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the canola plant cell and operably linked to a polynucleotide selected from: (a) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (b) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (c) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (d) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (e) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of the miRNA target, wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (f) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of the miRNA target; (g) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression the miRNA target; and (h) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of the miRNA target—wherein separate constructs are made for each of the miRNA targets enumerated in Table 5.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic canola plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a canola plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the canola plant cell and operably linked to each polynucleotide provided in Table 6, wherein separate constructs are made for each polynucleotide.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic canola plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a canola plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to a polynucleotide selected from DNA encoding each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic canola plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a canola plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to each polynucleotide of SEQ ID NOS: 15-2064.
The regenerated transgenic canola plants, or progeny transgenic canola plants or canola seeds, produced from the regenerated transgenic canola plants, are screened for an enhanced trait (e.g., increased yield), as compared to a control plant or seed (a plant or seed lacking expression of the recombinant DNA construct). From each group of multiple events of transgenic canola plants with a specific recombinant construct of this invention, the event that produces the greatest enhanced trait (e.g., greatest enhancement in yield) is identified and progeny canola seed is selected for commercial development.
Transformation of Cotton
A base transformation vector pMON99053 (SEQ ID NO: 2067), illustrated in Table 8 and
Methods for transformation of cotton are known in the art, see, for example, the techniques described in U.S. Patent Application Publications 2004/0087030A1 2008/0256667A1, 2008/0280361A1, and 2009/0138985A1, which are incorporated by reference. In an example of a cotton transformation protocol, seeds of transformable cotton genotypes (e.g., nectarless, DP393, OOSO4, 07W610F, STN474, Delta Pearl, DP5415, SureGrow501, or SureGrow747) are surface sterilized, rinsed, and hydrated in CSM medium (containing carbenicillin, cefotaxime, BRAVO, and Captan 50) for 14 to 42 hours in the dark. Meristematic explants are processed from seeds as described in U.S. Patent Application Publications 2008/0256667A1. Cultures of Agrobacterium cells each containing a transformation vector for expressing each of the recombinant DNA constructs of this invention are used to inoculate the explants using sonication. The inoculum is removed and the inoculated explants transferred to INO medium and incubated for 2 to 5 days using a 16-hour light photoperiod. Following co-cultivation, explants are transferred onto semi-solid selection medium (modified Lloyd & McCown Woody Plant Medium supplemented with 200 mg/L cefotaxime, 200 mg/L carbenicillin and 100-200 mg/L spectinomycin) with or without plant growth regulators or other additives to promote multiple shoot formation and growth. The explants are cultured in a 16-hour light photoperiod. After 4 to 6 weeks on the selection medium those explants that have developed green shoots are transferred to plugs and placed in liquid medium containing 0.25 mg/L IBA for shoot growth and rooting under plastic domes for 3 to 4 weeks. Tissues are assayed for molecular characterization by one or more molecular assay methods (e.g., PCR, or Southern blots).
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic cotton plant cells that are transformed with separate recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a cotton plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the cotton plant cell and operably linked to each polynucleotide selected from: (a) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (b) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (c) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (d) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (e) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3, wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (f) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (g) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; and (h) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic cotton plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a cotton plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the cotton plant cell and operably linked to a polynucleotide selected from: (a) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (b) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (c) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (d) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (e) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of the miRNA target, wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (f) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of the miRNA target; (g) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression the miRNA target; and (h) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of the miRNA target—wherein separate constructs are made for each of the miRNA targets enumerated in Table 5.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic cotton plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a cotton plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the cotton plant cell and operably linked to each polynucleotide provided in Table 6, wherein separate constructs are made for each polynucleotide.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic cotton plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a cotton plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to a polynucleotide selected from DNA encoding each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic cotton plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a cotton plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to each polynucleotide of SEQ ID NOS: 15-2064.
The regenerated transgenic cotton plants, or progeny transgenic cotton plants or cotton seeds, produced from the regenerated transgenic cotton plants, are screened for an enhanced trait (e.g., increased yield), as compared to a control plant or seed (a plant or seed lacking expression of the recombinant DNA construct). From each group of multiple events of transgenic cotton plants with a specific recombinant construct of this invention, the event that produces the greatest enhanced trait (e.g., greatest enhancement in yield) is identified and progeny cotton seed is selected for commercial development.
Agrobacterium T-
tumefaciens Ti plasmid which functions
Agrobacterium T-
E. coli
Agrobacterium
tumefaciens Ti plasmid which functions to
Agrobacterium
E. coli
E. coli plasmid ColE1.
Transformation of Sugarcane
Sugarcane transformation techniques are known in the art; see, for example, the procedures described for sugarcane by Brumbley et al. in “Sugarcane” (available electronically at mrw.interscience.wiley.com/emrw/9781405181099/hpt/article/k0701/current/pdf), published in: “Compendium of Transgenic Crop Plants”, edited by Chittaranjan Kole and Timothy C. Hall, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2008; ISBN 978-1-405-16924-0 (available electronically at mrw.interscience.wiley.com/emrw/9781405181099/hpt/toc), and in PCT International Patent Application Publications WO2007/003023 (sugarcane) and WO2008/049183 (sugarcane). In one example of sugarcane transformation (see Example 3 of PCT International Patent Application Publication WO2007003023A2), embryonic sugarcane callus cultures are established from apical meristem and primordial leafs of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid). Eight-week old calli are co-bombarded with an equimolar mixture of either UBI-1::Bar::NOSpolyA and UBI-1::Oas::NOSpolyA or UBI-1::Bar::NOSpolyA and UBI-1::CPs::NOSpolyA expression cassettes (10 pg DNAI3/mg particle) by particle bombardment as described previously (Sanford (1990) Plant Physiol., 79:206-209). After bombardment, calli are transferred to MS medium containing 1 mg/L PPT and 1 mg/L BAP to promote shoot regeneration and inhibit development of non transgenic tissue. Two weeks later, calli are transferred to MS medium containing 1 mg/L PPT and 1 mg/L Affi for shoot elongation and to induce root formation. After two weeks, plantlets are placed into magenta boxes for acclimatization and 2 weeks later, shoots (10-15 cm) with well developed roots are transferred to potting soil and placed in the greenhouse.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic sugarcane plant cells that are transformed with separate recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a sugarcane plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the sugarcane plant cell and operably linked to each polynucleotide selected from: (a) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (b) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (c) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (d) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (e) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3, wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (f) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; (g) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3; and (h) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic sugarcane plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a sugarcane plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the sugarcane plant cell and operably linked to a polynucleotide selected from: (a) DNA encoding a cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (b) DNA encoding a 5′-modified cleavage blocker to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (c) DNA encoding a translational inhibitor to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (d) DNA encoding a decoy to prevent or decrease small RNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript of the miRNA target; (e) DNA encoding a miRNA-unresponsive transgene having a nucleotide sequence derived from the native nucleotide sequence of the miRNA target, wherein a miRNA recognition site in the native nucleotide sequence is deleted or otherwise modified to prevent miRNA-mediated cleavage; (f) DNA encoding a miRNA precursor which is processed into a miRNA for suppressing expression of the miRNA target; (g) DNA encoding double-stranded RNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression the miRNA target; and (h) DNA encoding a ta-siRNA which is processed into siRNAs for suppressing expression of the miRNA target—wherein separate constructs are made for each of the miRNA targets enumerated in Table 5.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic sugarcane plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a sugarcane plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the sugarcane plant cell and operably linked to each polynucleotide provided in Table 6, wherein separate constructs are made for each polynucleotide.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic sugarcane plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a sugarcane plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to a polynucleotide selected from DNA encoding each miRNA target identified in Tables 2 and 3.
The above process is repeated to produce multiple events of transgenic sugarcane plant cells that are transformed with each of the following recombinant DNA constructs of this invention, i.e., a construct transcribable in a sugarcane plant cell, including a promoter that is functional in the plant cell and operably linked to each polynucleotide of SEQ ID NOS: 15-2064.
The regenerated transgenic sugarcane plants, or progeny transgenic sugarcane plants or sugarcane seeds, produced from the regenerated transgenic sugarcane plants, are screened for an enhanced trait (e.g., increased yield), as compared to a control plant or seed (a plant or seed lacking expression of the recombinant DNA construct). From each group of multiple events of transgenic sugarcane plants with a specific recombinant construct of this invention, the event that produces the greatest enhanced trait (e.g., greatest enhancement in yield) is identified and progeny sugarcane seed is selected for commercial development.
Further Embodiments
A miRNA decoy competes with the endogenous target gene to bind to that particular miRNA and thus reduces the effect of the miRNA in the biochemical network or networks involving the miRNA. Decoys include endogenous (native) miRNA decoy sequences, decoys created by manipulating an endogenous sequence (e.g., by chemical or other mutagenesis or site-directed recombination), and synthetic miRNA decoy sequences. A recombinant DNA construct can be designed to express multiple miRNA decoys. The advantages of a miRNA decoy approach include the fact that no protein is expressed, and because miRNAs often belong to multi-gene families (wherein each miRNA gene produces a unique miRNA primary transcript) that a single miRNA decoy is useful for binding to a mature miRNA that is derived from more than one miRNA gene or primary transcript.
However, an alternative to a miRNA decoy is sometimes preferred, as it is possible for a miRNA decoy that binds to mature miRNAs from more than one miRNA gene to unintentionally affect the expression of a non-target gene. Applicants have disclosed herein additional novel approaches for manipulating a miRNA-regulated pathway by interfering with the binding of the mature miRNA to its target. These approaches generally involve the in vivo (e.g., in planta) expression and processing of a recombinant DNA construct of this invention, and are especially useful for regulating the expression of single (or, where desired, multiple) target genes, and in manipulating gene expression in transgenic plants, resulting in improved phenotypes such as increased yield or biotic or abiotic stress tolerance.
One approach is by using a “cleavage blocker” or “5′-modified cleavage blocker” that is transgenically expressed in a eukaryotic cell and that binds to a miRNA recognition site of a target gene's transcript in a manner that does not lead to cleavage, thereby preventing or decreasing miRNA-mediated cleavage of the transcript by competing with the miRNA for binding to the recognition site. This method controls the rate of post-transcriptional suppression of miRNA target genes by protecting them from being cleaved by miRNA-Ago complex, and decreases or prevents down-regulation of the miRNA target gene. The invention includes analogous cleavage blockers that compete with other small RNAs involved in silencing, e.g., si-RNAs, trans-acting siRNAs, phased RNAs, natural antisense transcript siRNAs, natural antisense transcript miRNAs, or indeed any small RNA associated with a silencing complex such as RISC or an Argonaute or Argonaute-like protein.
Another approach is by using a “translational inhibitor” that is transgenically expressed in a eukaryotic cell and that binds to and inhibit translation of the target gene's transcript, thereby decreasing expression of the target gene. The nucleotide sequence of the translational inhibitor is designed so that the hybridized segment formed between the translational inhibitor and the target gene's transcript imparts to the transcript resistance to cleavage by an RNase III ribonuclease within or in the vicinity of the hybridized segment. Translational inhibitors provide the advantages of reducing the likelihood of transitive small RNAs forming (as can occur in miRNA-mediated degradation of a target gene), and achievement of more controlled regulation of target suppression because the translational inhibitor remains associated with the target gene's transcript (unlike miRNAs, which dissociate from the cleaved transcript and can then bind another transcript molecule). Translational inhibitors can be based on sequences selected from any small RNA associated with a silencing complex such as RISC or an Argonaute or Argonaute-like protein.
One of ordinary skill in the art easily recognizes that the above procedures are equally applicable to situations where the double-stranded RNA that mediates the target gene suppression is other than a miRNA. Thus, various aspects of this invention include analogous recombinant DNA constructs that are processed in vivo or in planta to provide RNA including single-stranded RNA that serve as an “siRNA cleavage blocker”, a “trans-acting siRNA cleavage blocker”, a “phased small RNA cleavage blocker”, a “natural antisense transcript siRNA cleavage blocker”, or a “natural antisense transcript miRNA cleavage blocker” (or, in general terms, a “small RNA cleavage blocker”), according to whether the RNase III ribonuclease cleavage that is inhibited is mediated by, respectively, an siRNA, a trans-acting siRNA, a phased small RNA, a natural antisense transcript siRNA, or a natural antisense transcript miRNA (or, in general terms, any small RNA associated with a silencing complex such as RISC or an Argonaute or Argonaute-like protein).
All of the materials and methods disclosed and claimed herein can be made and used without undue experimentation as instructed by the above disclosure. Although the materials and methods of this invention have been described in terms of preferred embodiments and illustrative examples, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations can be applied to the materials and methods described herein without departing from the concept, spirit and scope of the invention. All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and concept of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/077,244, filed 1 Jul. 2008, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. The sequence listing that is contained in the file named “38-21—55745_A.txt”, which is 2574 kilobytes (measured in operating system MS-Windows), was created on 27 Jun. 2008, and was filed by electronic submission with U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/077,244 on 1 Jul. 2008 is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. The sequence listing that is contained in the file named “38-21—55745_B13replacement.txt”, which is 2611 kilobytes (measured in operating system MS-Windows), created on 1 Sept. 2009, and electronically filed on 10 Sept. 2009 is incorporated herein by reference.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2009/049392 | 7/1/2009 | WO | 00 | 1/5/2011 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2010/002984 | 1/7/2010 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5004863 | Umbeck | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5015580 | Christou et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5159135 | Umbeck | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5416011 | Hinchee et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5463174 | Moloney et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5500365 | Fischhoff et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5518908 | Corbin et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5538880 | Lundquist et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5550318 | Adams et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5569834 | Hinchee et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5591616 | Hiei et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5633435 | Barry et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5780708 | Lundquist et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5824877 | Hinchee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5837848 | Ely et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5888732 | Hartley et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5914451 | Martinell et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5981840 | Zhao et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6084089 | Mine et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6118047 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6140078 | Sanders et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6153812 | Fry et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6160208 | Lundquist et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6194636 | McElroy et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6232526 | McElroy et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6252138 | Karimi et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6277608 | Hartley et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6288312 | Christou et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6294714 | Matsunaga et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6329571 | Hiei | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6365807 | Christou et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6384301 | Martinell et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6399861 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6403865 | Koziel et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6426446 | McElroy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6433252 | Kriz et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6437217 | McElroy et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 7026528 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7232806 | Tuschl et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 20010042257 | Connor-Ward et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020007051 | Cheo et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20040106198 | Hanley et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040115642 | Fu | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040123347 | Hinchey et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040126845 | Eenennaam et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040216189 | Houmard et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040244075 | Cai et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050144669 | Reinhart et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20060021087 | Baum et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200878 | Lutfiyya et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070011775 | Allen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070199095 | Allen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070300329 | Allen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080050744 | Brown et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080115240 | Aukerman et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080256667 | Dersch et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080280361 | Calabotta et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090070898 | Allen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO 2005110068 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO2006105436 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO2006105436 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007003023 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008027592 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008049183 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO2008133643 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO2008133643 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Baulcombe (Nature 431, p. 356-363, 2004). |
| Mallory et al (EMBO, 23, p. 3356-3364, 2004). |
| Baulcombe et al (Nature, 431, p. 356-363, 2004). |
| Hibio et al (Scientific Reports, 2(996), p. 1-10, 2012). |
| EP09774436.6 Supplemental Search Report dated Jul. 25, 2011. |
| Zeng et al “MicroRNAs and small interfering RNAs can inhibit mRNA expression by similar mechanisms” PNAS (2003) 100(17):9779-9784. |
| Zeng et al “Sequence requirements for micro RNA processing and function in human cells” RNA Journal (2003) 9:112-123. |
| Parizotto et al “In vivo investigation of the transcription, processing, endonucleolytic activity, and functional relevance of the spatial distribution of a plant miRNA” Genes&Development (2004) 18:2237-2242. |
| Axtell et al “A Two-Hit Trigger for siRNA Biogenesis in Plants” Cell (2006) 127:565-577. |
| Zorrilla et al “Target mimicry provides a new mechanism for regulation of microRNA activity” Nature Genetics (2007) 39(8):1033-1037. |
| Jones-Rhoades et al “MicroRNAs and Their Regulatory Roles in Plants” Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. (2006) 57:19-53. |
| Rhoades et al “Prediction of Plant MicroRNA Targets” Cell (2002) 110:513-520. |
| Choi et al “Target Protectors Reveal Dampening and Balancing of Nodal Agonist and Antagonist by miR-430” Science (2007) 318:271-274. |
| CN2009801316969 First Office Action issued Apr. 12, 2012. |
| CN2009801316969 Second Office Action issued Nov. 29, 2012. |
| CN2009801316969 Third Office Action issued May 31, 2013. |
| EP097744346 First Exam Report issued Jul. 18, 2013. |
| PCTUS2009049392 Search Report and Written Opinion issued Oct. 21, 2009. |
| PCTUS2009049392 IPRP issued Jun. 22, 2010. |
| Baulcombe et al. RNA Silencing in Plants. Nature. (2004) 431:356-63. |
| Hibio et al. Stability of miRNA 5′terminal and seed regions. Scientific Reports. (2012) 2(996):1-10. |
| Mallory et al. MicroRNA control of PHABULOSA in leaf development. EMBO (2004) 23:3356-3364. |
| CN2009801316969 Fourth Office Action issued Dec. 18, 2013. |
| AU2009267007 First Exam Report issued Apr. 29, 2014. |
| Allen et al., “microRNA-Directed Phasing during Trans-Acting siRNA Biogenesis in Plants,” Cell, 121:207-221 (2005). |
| Ambros et al., “A uniform system for microRNA annotation,” RNA, 9:277-279 (2003). |
| Aslanidis et al., “Ligation-independent cloning of PCR products (LIC-POR),” Nucleic Acids Research, 18(20):6069-6074 (1990). |
| Axtell et al., “Common Functions for Diverse Small RNAs of Land Plants,” The Plant Cell , 19:1750-1769 (2007). |
| Bayer et al., “Programmable ligand-controlled riboregulators of eukaryotic gene expression,” Nature Biotechnol., 23(3):337-343 (2005). |
| Borsani et al., “Endogenous siRNAs Derived from a Pair of Natural cis-Antisense Transcripts Regulate Salt Tolerance in Arabidopsis,” Cell, 123:1279-1291 (2005). |
| Davidson et al., “Engineering regulatory RNAs,” TRENDS in Biotechnology, 23(3):109-112 (2005). |
| De Amicis et al., “Intercodon dincleotides affect codon choice in plant genes,” Nucleic Acid Research, 28(17):3339-3346 (2000). |
| De Framond, “MINI-Ti: A New Vector Strategy for Plant Genetic Engineering,” Nature Biotechnology, 1:262-269 (1983). |
| Ellington et al., “In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands,” Nature, 346:818-822 (1990). |
| Fattash et al., “Evidence for the rapid expansion of microRNA-mediated regulation in early land plant evolution,” BMC Plant Biol., 7:13 (2007). |
| Hamilton et al., “Two classes of short interfering RNA in RNA silencing,” The EMBO Journal, 21(17):4671-4679 (2002). |
| Hoekema et al., “A binary plant vector strategy based on separation of vir- and T-region of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti-plasmid,” Nature, 303:179-180 (1983). |
| Isaacs et al., “Engineered riboregulators enable post-transcriptional control of gene expression,” Nature Biotechnology, 22(7):841-847 (2004). |
| Kasschau et al., “P1/HC-Pro, a Viral Suppressor of RNA Silencing, Interferes with Arabidopsis Development and miRNA Function,” Dev. Cell, 4:205-217 (2003). |
| Kim, “MicroRNA Biogenesis: Coordinated Cropping and Dicing,” Nature Reviews | Molecular Cell Biology, 6:376-385 (2005). |
| Khvorova et al., “Functional siRNAs and miRNAs Exhibit Strand Bias,” Cell, 115:209-216 (2003). |
| Kościańska et al., “Analysis of RNA silencing in agroinfiltrated leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana and Nicotiana tabacum,” Plant Mol. Biol., 59:647-661 (2005). |
| Lau et al., “Characterization of the piRNA Complex from Rat Testes,” Science, 313:363-367 (2006). |
| Lauter et al., “microRNA 172 down-regulates glossy15 to promote vegetative phase change in maize,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102(26):9412-9417 (2005). |
| Lee et al., “Aptamer Database,” Nucleic Acids Research, 32:D95-D100 (2004). |
| Llave et al., “Cleavage of Scarecrow-like mRNA Targets Directed by a Class of Arabidopsis miRNA,” Science, 297:2053-2056 (2002). |
| Lu et al., “RNA silencing in plants by the expression of siRNA duplexes,” Nucleic Acids Res., 32(21):e171 (2004). |
| Lu et al., “Novel and Mechanical Stress—Responsive MicroRNAs in Populus trichocarpa That Are Absent from Arabidopsis,” The Plant Cell, 17:2186-2203 (2005). |
| Lu et al., “Genome-wide analysis for discovery of rice microRNAs reveals natural antisense microRNAs (nat-miRNAs),” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105: 4951-4956 (2008). |
| Luo et al.,“Rice embryogenic calli express a unique set of microRNAs, suggesting regulatory roles of microRNAs in plant post-embryogenic development,” FEBS Lett., 580:5111-5116 (2006). |
| Makeyev et al., “Multilevel Regulation of Gene Expression by MicroRNAs,” Science, 319:1789-1790 (2008). |
| Mandal et al., “Adenine riboswitches and gene activation by disruption of a transcription terminator,” Nature Struct. Mol. Biol., 11(1):29-35 (2004). |
| Mandal et al., “Gene Regulation by Riboswitches,” Nature Reviews | Molecular Cell Biology, 5:451-463 (2004). |
| Mi et al., “Sorting of Small RNAs into Arabidopsis Argonaute Complexes Is Directed by the 50′ Terminal Nucleotide,” Cell, 133:116-127 (2008). |
| Molnár et al., “miRNAs control gene expression in the single-cell alga Chlamydominas reinhardtii,” Nature, 447:1126-1130 (2007). |
| O'Donnell et al., “Mighty Piwis Defend the Germline against Genome Intruders,” Cell, 129:37-44 (2007). |
| Rashtchian et al., “Uracil DNA Glycosylase-Mediated Cloning of Polymerase Chain Reaction-Amplified DNA: Application to Genomic and cDNA Cloning,” Analytical Biochemistry, 206:91-97 (1992). |
| Rhoades et al., “Prediction of Plant MicroRNA Targets,” Cell, 110:513-520 (2002). |
| Sanford, “Biolistic plant transformation,” Physiol. Plant., 79:206-209 (1990). |
| Schwarz et al., “Asymmetry in the Assembly of the RNAi Enzyme Complex,” Cell, 115:199-208 (2003). |
| Sudarsan et al., “Metabolite-binding RNA domains are present in the genes of eukaryotes,” RNA, 9:644-647 (2003). |
| Sunkar et al., “Cloning and Characterization of MicroRNAs from Rice,” The Plant Cell, 17:1397-1411 (2005). |
| Tang et al., “Structural diversity of self-cleaving ribozymes,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97(11):5784-5789 (2000). |
| Tuschl, “Expanding small RNA interference,” Nature Biotechnol., 20: 446-448 (2002). |
| Wetering et al., “Specific inhibition of gene expression using a stably integrated, inducible small-interfering-RNA vector” EMBO Rep., 4(6): 609-615 (2003). |
| Winkler et al., “Thiamine derivatives bind messenger RNAs directly to regulate bacterial gene expression,” Nature, 419:952-956 (2002). |
| Vazquez et al., “Endogenous trans-Acting siRNAs Regulate the Accumulation of Arabidopsis mRNAs,” Mol. Cell, 16:69-79 (2004). |
| Zhang, “miRU: an automated plant miRNA target prediction server,” Nucleic Acids Research, 33:W701-W704 (2005). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110296555 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61077244 | Jul 2008 | US |
