Patent Grant
9006395
Pursuant to the provisions of 37 C.F.R. §1.52(e)(5), the sequence listing text file named 76596_Seq_Lstng.txt, created on Oct. 5, 2010 and having a size of 1,239,886 bytes, and which is being submitted herewith, is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
This invention relates to recombinant toxin fragments, to DNA encoding these fragments and to their uses such as in a vaccine and for in vitro and in vivo purposes.
The clostridial neurotoxins are potent inhibitors of calcium-dependent neurotransmitter secretion in neuronal cells. They are currently considered to mediate this activity through a specific endoproteolytic cleavage of at least one of three vesicle or pre-synaptic membrane associated proteins VAMP, syntaxin or SNAP-25 which are central to the vesicle docking and membrane fusion events of neurotransmitter secretion. The neuronal cell targeting of tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins is considered to be a receptor mediated event following which the toxins become internalised and subsequently traffic to the appropriate intracellular compartment where they effect their endopeptidase activity.
The clostridial neurotoxins share a common architecture of a catalytic L-chain (LC, ca 50 kDa) disulphide linked to a receptor binding and translocating H-chain (HC, ca 100 kDa). The HC polypeptide is considered to comprise all or part of two distinct functional domains. The carboxy-terminal half of the HC (ca 50 kDa), termed the HC domain, is involved in the high affinity, neurospecific binding of the neurotoxin to cell surface receptors on the target neuron, whilst the amino-terminal half, termed the HN domain (ca 50 kDa), is considered to mediate the translocation of at least some portion of the neurotoxin across cellular membranes such that the functional activity of the LC is expressed within the target cell. The HN domain also has the property, under conditions of low pH, of forming ion-permeable channels in lipid membranes, this may in some manner relate to its translocation function.
For botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) these domains are considered to reside within amino acid residues 872-1296 for the HC, amino acid residues 449-871 for the HN and residues 1-448 for the LC. Digestion with trypsin effectively degrades the He domain of the BoNT/A to generate a non-toxic fragment designated LHN, which is no longer able to bind to and enter neurons (
It is therefore possible to provide functional definitions of the domains within the neurotoxin molecule, as follows:
(A) clostridial neurotoxin light chain:
a metalloprotease exhibiting high substrate specificity for vesicle and/or plasma-membrane associated proteins involved in the exocytotic process. In particular, it cleaves one or more of SNAP-25, VAMP (synaptobrevin/cellubrevin) and syntaxin.
(B) clostridial neurotoxin heavy chain HN domain:
a portion of the heavy chain which enables translocation of that portion of the neurotoxin molecule such that a functional expression of light chain activity occurs within a target cell.
the domain responsible for translocation of the endopeptidase activity, following binding of neurotoxin to its specific cell surface receptor via the binding domain, into the target cell.
the domain responsible for formation of ion-permeable pores in lipid membranes under conditions of low pH.
the domain responsible for increasing the solubility of the entire polypeptide compared to the solubility of light chain alone.
(C) clostridial neurotoxin heavy chain HC domain.
a portion of the heavy chain which is responsible for binding of the native holotoxin to cell surface receptor(s) involved in the intoxicating action of clostridial toxin prior to internalisation of the toxin into the cell.
The identity of the cellular recognition markers for these toxins is currently not understood and no specific receptor species have yet been identified although Kozaki et al. have reported that synaptotagmin may be the receptor for botulinum neurotoxin type B. It is probable that each of the neurotoxins has a different receptor.
It is desirable to have positive controls for toxin assays, to develop clostridial toxin vaccines and to develop therapeutic agents incorporating desirable properties of clostridial toxin.
However, due to its extreme toxicity, the handling of native toxin is hazardous.
The present invention seeks to overcome or at least ameliorate problems associated with production and handling of clostridial toxin.
Accordingly, the invention provides a polypeptide comprising first and second domains, wherein said first domain is adapted to cleave one or more vesicle or plasma-membrane associated proteins essential to neuronal exocytosis and wherein said second domain is adapted (i) to translocate the polypeptide into the cell or (ii) to increase the solubility of the polypeptide compared to the solubility of the first domain on its own or (iii) both to translocate the polypeptide into the cell and to increase the solubility of the polypeptide compared to the solubility of the first domain on its own, said polypeptide being free of clostridial neurotoxin and free of any clostridial neurotoxin precursor that can be converted into toxin by proteolytic action. Accordingly, the invention may thus provide a single polypeptide chain containing a domain equivalent to a clostridial toxin light chain and a domain providing the functional aspects of the HN of a clostridial toxin heavy chain, whilst lacking the functional aspects of a clostridial toxin HC domain.
In a preferred embodiment, the present invention provides a single chain polypeptide comprising first and second domains, wherein:
said first domain is a clostridial neurotoxin light chain or a fragment or a variant thereof, wherein said first domain is capable of cleaving one or more vesicle or plasma membrane associated proteins essential to exocytosis; and
said second domain is a clostridial neurotoxin heavy chain HN portion or a fragment or a variant thereof, wherein said second domain is capable of (i) translocating the polypeptide into a cell or (ii) increasing the solubility of the polypeptide compared to the solubility of the first domain on its own or (iii) both translocating the polypeptide into a cell and increasing the solubility of the polypeptide compared to the solubility of the first domain on its own; and wherein the second domain lacks a functional C-terminal part of a clostridial neurotoxin heavy chain designated He thereby rendering the polypeptide incapable of binding to cell surface receptors that are the natural cell surface receptors to which native clostridial neurotoxin binds.
In the above preferred embodiment, the first domain is qualified by a requirement for the presence of a particular cleavage function. Said cleavage function may be present when the light chain (L-chain) component is part of the single chain polypeptide molecule perse. Alternatively, the cleavage function may be substantially latent in the single chain polypeptide molecule, and may be activated by proteolytic cleavage of the single polypeptide between the first and second domains to form, for example, a dichain polypeptide molecule comprising the first and second domains disulphide bonded together.
The first domain is based on a clostridial neurotoxin light chain (L-chain), and embraces both fragments and variants of said L-chain so long as these components possess the requisite cleavage function. An example of a variant is an L-chain (or fragment thereof) in which one or more amino acid residues has been altered vis-a-vis a native clostridial L-chain sequence. In one embodiment, the modification may involve one or more conservative amino acid substitutions. Other modifications may include the removal or addition of one or more amino acid residues vis-a-vis a native clostridial L-chain sequence. However, any such fragment or variant must retain the aforementioned cleavage function.
The structure of clostridial neurotoxins was well known prior to the present invention—see, for example, Kurazono et al. (1992) J. Biol. Chem., 267, 21, pp. 14721-14729. In particular, the Kurazono paper describes the minimum Domains required for cleavage activity (eg. proteolytic enzyme activity) of a clostridial neurotoxin L-chain. Similar discussion is provided by Poulain et al. (1989) Eur. J. Biochem., 185, pp. 197-203, by Zhou et al. (1995), 34, pp. 15175-15181, and by Baustein et al. (1987), 226, No. 1, pp. 115-120.
By way of exemplification, Table II on page 14726 of Kurazono et al. (1992) illustrates a number of L-chain deletion mutants (both amino-terminal and carboxy-terminal L-chain deletion mutants are illustrated). Such mutants, together with other L-chain mutants containing, for example, similar amino acid deletions or conservative amino acid substitutions are embraced by the first domain definition of the present invention provided that the L-chain component in question has the requisite cleavage activity.
Prior to the present application a number of conventional, simple assays were available to allow a skilled person to routinely confirm whether a given L-chain (or equivalent L-chain component) had the requisite cleavage activity. These assays are based on the inherent ability of a functional L-chain to effect peptide cleavage of specific vesicle or plasma membrane associated proteins (eg. synaptobrevin, syntaxin, or SNAP-25) involved in neuronal exocytosis, and simply test for the presence of the cleaved products of said proteolytic reaction.
For example, in a rough-and-ready assay, SNAP-25 (or synaptobrevin, or syntaxin) may be challenged with a test L-chain (or equivalent L-chain component), and then analysed by SDS-PAGE peptide separation techniques. Subsequent detection of peptides (eg. by silver staining) having molecular weights corresponding to the cleaved products of SNAP-25 (or other component of the neurosecretory machinery) would indicate the presence of an L-chain (or equivalent L-chain component) possessing the requisite cleavage activity.
In an alternative assay, SNAP-25 (or a different neuronal exocytosis molecule) may be challenged with a test L-chain (or equivalent L-chain component), and the cleavage products subjected to antibody detection as described in PCT/GB95/01279 (i.e., WO95/33850) in the name of the present Applicant, Microbiological Research Authority. In more detail, a specific antibody is employed for detecting the cleavage of SNAP-25, which antibody recognises cleaved SNAP-25 but not uncleaved SNAP-25. Identification of the cleaved product by the antibody confirms the presence of an L-chain (or equivalent L-chain component) possessing the requisite cleavage activity. By way of exemplification, such a method is described in Examples 2 and 3 of PCT/GB96/00916 (i.e., WO96/33273), also in the name of Microbiological Research Authority.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the second domain is qualified by the ability to provide one or both of two functions, namely (i) translocation and/or (ii) increased solubility of the first domain.
The second domain is based on a HN portion of a clostridial neurotoxin, which portion has been extensively described and characterised in the literature. Particular mention is made to Kurazono et al. (1992) in which the structure of clostridial neurotoxin heavy chains is discussed together with the functions associated with the HN and HC portions thereof [see, for example, the bottom illustration in FIG. 1 on page 14722 of Kurazono et al. (1992)]. In more detail, the HN domain is a domain of a clostridial neurotoxin that functions to translocate a clostridial L-chain across the endosomal membrane of a vesicle, and is synonymous with the H2 domain of a clostridial neurotoxin [see the bottom left-hand column and footer on page 197 of Poulain et al. (1989); see FIG. 1 in Blaustein et al. (1987); and see also the sentence bridging pages 178 and 179 of Shone et al. (1987), Eur. J. Biochem., 167, pp. 175-180].
The second domain definition of the present invention includes fragments and variants of the HN portion of a clostridial neurotoxin so long as these components provide the requisite (I) translocation and/or (ii) improved solubility function. An example of a variant is an HN portion (or fragment thereof) in which one or more amino acid residues has been altered vis-a-vis a native clostridial HN domain sequence. In one embodiment, the modification may involve one or more conservative amino acid substitutions. Other modifications may include the removal or addition of one or more amino acid residues vis-a-vis a native clostridial HN sequence. However, any such fragment or variant must provide the aforementioned (i) translocation and/or (ii) improved solubility function.
The (i) translocation and (ii) improved solubility functions are now described in more detail.
Prior to the present application a number of conventional, simple assays were available to allow a skilled person to routinely confirm whether a particular clostridial neurotoxin HN portion (or equivalent HN component) had the requisite translocation function. In this respect, particular mention is made to the assays described in Shone et al. (1987) and Blaustein et al. (1987), which are now discussed.
These papers describe studies of the translocation function of clostridial neurotoxins, and demonstrate that the ability of said neurotoxins to form channels is associated with the presence of a translocation function.
Shone et al. (1987) describes an assay employing artificial liposomes loaded with potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) and radiolabelled NAD. Thus, to confirm whether a test HN portion (or equivalent H-chain component) of a clostridial neurotoxin has the requisite translocation function, the artificial liposomes are challenged with the test HN portion. The release of K+ and NAD from the liposomes is indicative of a channel-forming activity, and thus the presence of a translocation function.
An alternative assay is described by Blaustein et al. (1987), wherein planar phospholipid bilayer membranes are used to test for channel-forming activity. Salt solutions on either side of the membrane are buffered at different pH—on the cis side, pH 4.7 or 5.5 and on the trans side, pH 7.4. Thus, to confirm whether a HN portion (or equivalent H-chain component) of a clostridial neurotoxin has the requisite translocation function, the test HN portion is added to the cis side of the membrane and electrical measurements made under voltage clamp conditions, in order to monitor the flow of current across the membrane (see paragraph 2.2 on pages 116-118). The presence of a desired translocation activity is confirmed by a steady rate of channel turn-on (see paragraph 3 on page 118).
Turning now to the second heavy chain function, namely (ii) increased solubility of the first domain. A conventional problem associated with the preparation of a clostridial neurotoxin L-chain molecules is that said L-chain molecules generally possess poor solubility characteristics. Thus, in one embodiment of the present invention, the fusion of a second domain (based on a HN portion of a clostridial neurotoxin) to the L-chain increases the solubility of the L-chain. Similarly, the addition of a second domain to a L-chain equivalent molecule (eg. a fragment, or variant of a L-chain) increases the solubility of the L-chain equivalent molecule.
Prior to the present application a number of conventional, simple assays were available to allow a skilled person to routinely confirm whether a particular clostridial neurotoxin HN portion (or equivalent HN component) had the requisite ability to increase the solubility of a L-chain (or equivalent L-chain component). The most common method to assess solubility is through use of centrifugation, followed by a range of protein determination methods. For example, lysed E. coli cells containing expressed clostridial endopeptidase are centrifuged at 25,000×g for 15 minutes to pellet cell debris and aggregated protein material. Following removal of the supernatant (containing soluble protein) the cell debris can be reconstituted in SDS-containing sample buffer (to solubilise the poorly soluble protein), prior to analysis of the two fractions by SDS-PAGE. Coomassie blue staining of electrophoresed protein, followed by densitometric analysis of the relevant protein band, facilitates a semi-quantitative analysis of solubility of expressed protein.
A further requirement of the single polypeptide molecule according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention is that the second domain lacks a functional C-terminal part of a clostridial neurotoxin heavy chain designated He, thereby rendering the polypeptide incapable of binding to cell surface receptors that are the natural cell surface receptors to which a native clostridial neurotoxin binds. This requirement is now discussed in more detail, and reference to incapable of binding throughout the present specification is to be interpreted as substantially incapable of binding, or reduced in binding ability when compared with native clostridial neurotoxin.
It has been well documented, for example in the above-described literature and elsewhere, that native clostridial neurotoxin binds to specific target cells through a binding interaction that involves the HC domain of the toxin heavy chain and a specific receptor on the target cell.
However, in contrast to native neurotoxin, the single polypeptide molecules according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention lack a functional He domain of native clostridial neurotoxin. Thus, the preferred single polypeptide molecules of the present invention are not capable of binding to the specific receptors targeted by native clostridial neurotoxin.
Prior to the present application a number of conventional, simple assays were available to allow a skilled person to routinely confirm whether a particular clostridial neurotoxin HN portion (or equivalent HN component) lacked the binding ability of native clostridial neurotoxin. In this respect, particular mention is made to the assays described by Shone et al. (1985) Eur. J. Biochem., 151 (1), pp. 75-82, and by Black & Dolly (1986) J. Cell. Biol., 103, pp. 521-534. The basic Shone et al. (1985) method has been recently repeated in Sutton et al. (2001), 493, pp. 45-49 to assess the binding ability of tetanus toxins.
These papers describe simple methods for assessing binding of the H-chain of a clostridial neurotoxin to its target cells, motor neurons. Hence, these methods provide a means for routinely determining whether a modification to the H-chain results in a loss of or reduced native binding affinity of the H-chain for motor neurons. The methods are now discussed in more detail.
The Shone et al. (1985) method is based on a competitive binding assay in which test neurotoxin H-chain fragments are compared with radiolabelled native neurotoxin in their ability to bind to purified rat cerebrocortical synaptosomes (ie. native toxin target cells). A reduction of HC function (ie. binding ability) is demonstrated by a reduced ability of the test H-chain fragments to compete with the labelled intact toxin for binding to the synaptosomes (see page 76, column 1 to line 51-column 2, line 5).
Sutton et al. (2001) carried out similar competitive binding experiments using radiolabelled intact tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT) and unlabelled site-directed (TeNT) mutants. As above, a positive result in the assay is demonstrated by an inability of the mutant fragments to compete with the labelled TeNT for binding to synaptosomes.
An alternative approach is described by Black & Dolly (1986), which method employed electron microscopic autoradiography to visually assess binding of radiolabelled clostridial neurotoxins at the vertebrate neuromuscular junction, both in vivo and in vitro. Thus, this assay represents a simple visual method for confirming whether a test HN domain (or equivalent HN component) lacks a functional HC domain.
There are numerous ways by which a second domain that lacks a functional HC domain may be prepared. In this respect, inactivation of the He domain may be achieved at the amino acid level (e.g., by use of a derivatising chemical, or a proteolytic enzyme), or at the nucleic acid level (e.g., by use of site-directed mutagenesis, nucleotide(s) insertion or deletion or modification, or by use of truncated nucleic acid).
For example, it would be routine for a skilled person to select a conventional derivatising chemical or proteolytic agent suitable for removal or modification of the HC domain. Standard derivatising chemicals and proteolytic agents are readily available in the art, and it would be routine for a skilled person to confirm that said chemicals/agents provide an HN domain with reduced or removed native binding affinity by following any one of a number of simple tests such as those described above.
Conventional derivatising chemicals may include any one of the following, which form a non-exhaustive list of examples:
(1) tyrosine derivatising chemicals such as anhydrides, more specifically maleic anhydride;
(2) diazonium based derivatising chemicals such as bis-Diazotized o-Tolidine, and diazotized p-aminobenzoyl biocytin;
(3) EDC (1-ethyl 1-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride);
(4) isocyanate based derivatising chemicals such as dual treatment with tetranitromethane followed by sodium dithionite; and
(5) iodinating derivatising chemicals such as chloramine-T (N-chlorotoluene sulfonamide) or IODO-GEN (1,3,4,6-tetrachloro-3a,ba-diphenylglycouril).
Conventional proteolytic agents may include any one of the following, which form a non-exhaustive list of examples:
(1) trypsin [as demonstrated in Shone et al. (1985)];
(2) proline endopeptidase
(3) lys C proteinase;
(4) chymotrypsin;
(5) thermolysin; and
(6) arg C proteinase.
Alternatively, conventional nucleic acid mutagenesis methods may be employed to generate modified nucleic acid sequences that encode second domains lacking a functional HC domain. For example, mutagenesis methods such as those described in Kurazono et al. (1992) may be employed. A range of systems for mutagenesis of DNA are available, based on the DNA manipulation techniques described by: Kunkel T. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 82, pp. 488-492; Taylor, J. W. et al. (1985) Nucleic Acids Res. 13, pp. 8749-8764 (1995); and Deng G. & Nickeloff J. A. (1992) Anal. Biochem., 200, pp. 81-88.
According to all general aspects of the present invention, a polypeptide of the invention can be soluble but lack the translocation function of a native toxin—this is of use in providing an immunogen for vaccinating or assisting to vaccinate an individual against challenge by toxin. In a specific embodiment of the invention described in an example below a polypeptide designated LH423/A elicited neutralising antibodies against type A neurotoxin. A polypeptide of the invention can likewise thus be relatively insoluble but retain the translocation function of a native toxin—this is of use if solubility is imparted to a composition made up of that polypeptide and one or more other components by one or more of said other components.
The first domain of the polypeptide of the invention cleaves one or more vesicle or plasma-membrane associated proteins essential to the specific cellular process of exocytosis, and cleavage of these proteins results in inhibition of exocytosis, typically in a non-cytotoxic manner. The cell or cells affected are not restricted to a particular type or subgroup but can include both neuronal and non-neuronal cells. The activity of clostridial neurotoxins in inhibiting exocytosis has, indeed, been observed almost universally in eukaryotic cells expressing a relevant cell surface receptor, including such diverse cells as from Aplysia (sea slug), Drosophila (fruit fly) and mammalian nerve cells, and the activity of the first domain is to be understood as including a corresponding range of cells.
The polypeptide of the invention may be obtained by expression of a recombinant nucleic acid, preferably a DNA, and is a single polypeptide, that is to say not cleaved into separate light and heavy chain domains. The polypeptide is thus available in convenient and large quantities using recombinant techniques.
In a polypeptide according to the invention, said first domain preferably comprises a clostridial toxin light chain or a fragment or variant of a clostridial toxin light chain. The fragment is optionally an N-terminal, or C-terminal fragment of the light chain, or is an internal fragment, so long as it substantially retains the ability to cleave the vesicle or plasma-membrane associated protein essential to exocytosis. The minimal domains necessary for the activity of the light chain of clostridial toxins are described in J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 267, No. 21, July 1992, pages 14721-14729. The variant has a different peptide sequence from the light chain or from the fragment, though it too is capable of cleaving the vesicle or plasma-membrane associated protein. It is conveniently obtained by insertion, deletion and/or substitution of a light chain or fragment thereof. In embodiments of the invention described below a variant sequence comprises (i) an N-terminal extension to a clostridial toxin light chain or fragment (ii) a clostridial toxin light chain or fragment modified by alteration of at least one amino acid (iii) a C-terminal extension to a clostridial toxin light chain or fragment, or (iv) combinations of 2 or more of (i)-(iii).
The first domain preferably exhibits endopeptidase activity specific for a substrate selected from one or more of SNAP-25, synaptobrevinNAMP and syntaxin. The clostridial toxin is preferably botulinum toxin or tetanus toxin.
In one embodiment of the invention described in an example below, the toxin light chain and the portion of the toxin heavy chain are of botulinum toxin type A. In a further embodiment of the invention described in an example below, the toxin light chain and the portion of the toxin heavy chain are of botulinum toxin type B. The polypeptide optionally comprises a light chain or fragment or variant of one toxin type and a heavy chain or fragment or variant of another toxin type.
In a polypeptide according to the invention said second domain preferably comprises a clostridial toxin heavy chain HN portion or a fragment or variant of a clostridial toxin heavy chain HN portion. The fragment is optionally an N-terminal or C-terminal or internal fragment, so long as it retains the function of the HN domain. Teachings of regions within the HN responsible for its function are provided for example in Biochemistry 1995, 34, pages 15175-15181 and Eur. J. Biochem, 1989, 185, pages 197-203. The variant has a different sequence from the HN domain or fragment, though it too retains the function of the HN domain. It is conveniently obtained by insertion, deletion and/or substitution of a HN domain or fragment thereof. In embodiments of the invention, described below, it comprises (i) an N-terminal extension to a HN domain or fragment, (ii) a C-terminal extension to a HN domain or fragment, (iii) a modification to a HN domain or fragment by alteration of at least one amino acid, or (iv) combinations of 2 or more of (i)-(iii). The clostridial toxin is preferably botulinum toxin or tetanus toxin.
The invention also provides a polypeptide comprising a clostridial neurotoxin light chain and a N-terminal fragment of a clostridial neurotoxin heavy chain, the fragment preferably comprising at least 423 of the N-terminal amino acids of the heavy chain of botulinum toxin type A, 417 of the N-terminal amino acids of the heavy chain of botulinum toxin type B or the equivalent number of N-terminal amino acids of the heavy chain of other types of clostridial toxin such that the fragment possesses an equivalent alignment of homologous amino acid residues.
These polypeptides of the invention are thus not composed of two or more polypeptides, linked for example by di-sulphide bridges into composite molecules. Instead, these polypeptides are single chains and are not active or their activity is significantly reduced in an in vitro assay of neurotoxin endopeptidase activity.
Further, the polypeptides may be susceptible to be converted into a form exhibiting endopeptidase activity by the action of a proteolytic agent, such as trypsin. In this way it is possible to control the endopeptidase activity of the toxin light chain.
In further embodiments of the invention, the polypeptide contains an amino acid sequence modified so that (a) there is no protease sensitive region between the LC and HN components of the polypeptide, or (b) the protease sensitive region is specific for a particular protease. This latter embodiment is of use if it is desired to activate the endopeptidase activity of the light chain in a particular environment or cell. Though, in general, the polypeptides of the invention are activated prior to administration.
More generally, a proteolytic cleavage site may be introduced between any two domains of the single chain polypeptide molecule.
For example, a cleavage site may be introduced between the first and second domains such that cleavage thereof converts the single chain polypeptide molecule into a dichain polypeptide structure wherein the first and second domains are linked together by a disulphide bond. Specific Examples of such molecules are provided by SEQ IDs 11-18 of the present application in which an Factor Xa cleavage site has been introduced between the first domain (L-chain) and the second domain (HN).
A range of peptide sequences having inherent cleavage sites are available for insertion into the junction between one or more domains of a polypeptide according to the present invention. For example, insertion of a cleavage site between the first (L-chain) and second (HN) domains may result in a single polypeptide chain molecule that is proteolytically cleavable to form a dichain polypeptide in which the first and second domains are held together by a disulphide bond between the first and second domains. The proteolytic cleavage may be performed in vitro prior to use, or in vivo by cell specific activation through intracellular proteolytic action.
Alternatively (or additionally), a cleavage site may be introduced between the second and third domains, or between the purification tag and the polypeptide of the present invention. The third domain and purification tag aspects of the present invention are discussed in more detail below.
To facilitate convenient insertion of a range of cleavage sites into the junction between the LC and HN domains, it is preferable to prepare an expression clone that can serve as a template for future clone development. Such a template is represented by SEQ ID 103, in which the DNA encoding LHN/B has been modified by standard mutagenesis techniques to incorporate unique restriction enzyme sites. To incorporate new cleavage sites at the junction requires simple insertion of novel oligonucleotides encoding the new cleavage site.
Suitable cleavage sites include, but are not limited to, those described in Table 1.
In some cases, the use of certain cleavage sites and corresponding proteolytic enzymes (eg. precission, thrombin) will leave a short N-terminal extension on the polypeptide at a position C-terminal to the cleavage site (see the cleavage pattern for the exemplified proteases in Table 1).
Peptide sequences may be introduced between any two domains to facilitate specific cleavage of the domains at a later stage. This approach is commonly used in proprietary expression systems for cleavage and release of a purification tag (eg. maltose-binding protein (MBP), glutathione S-transferase (GST), polyhistidine tract (His6)) from a fusion protein that includes the purification tag. In this respect, the purification tag is preferably fused to the N- or C-terminus of the polypeptide in question.
The choice of cleavage site may have a bearing on the precise nature of the N-terminus (or C-terminus) of the released polypeptide. To illustrate this, identical LHN/B fragments produced in such proprietary systems are described in SEQ ID 88, 94, 96, 98, in which the N-terminal extensions to the LHN/B sequence are ISEFGS (SEQ ID NO: 192), GS, SPGARGS SEQ ID NO: 193) & AMADIGS (SEQ ID NO: 194) respectively. In the case of LHN/C fragments, SEQ ID 126, 128 & 130 describe the N-terminal sequences VPEFGSSRVDH (SEQ ID NO: 195), ISEFGSSRVDH (SEQ ID NO: 196) and VPEFGSSRVDH (SEQ ID NO: 197) following release of the LHN/C fragment from its fusion tag by enterokinase, genenase and Factor Xa respectively. Each of these extension peptide sequences is an example of a variant L-chain sequence of the present invention. Similarly, if the purification tag were to be fused to the C-terminal end of the second domain, the resulting cleaved polypeptide (ie. fusion protein minus purification tag) would include C-terminal extension amino acids. Each of these extension peptides provides an example of a variant HN portion of the present invention.
In some cases, cleavage at a specific site, for example, between a purification tag and a polypeptide of the present invention may be of lower efficiency than desired. To address this potential problem, the present Applicant has modified proprietary vectors in two particular ways, which modifications may be employed individually or in combination with each other. Whilst said modifications may be applied to cleavage sites between any two domains in a polypeptide or fusion protein according to the present invention, the following discussion simply illustrates a purification tag-first domain cleavage event.
First, the DNA is modified to include an additional peptide spacer sequence, which optionally may represent one or more additional cleavage sites, at the junction of the purification tag and the polypeptide. Examples of the full-length expressed polypeptide from this approach are presented in SEQ ID 86, 90 & 92. Such an approach has resulted in efficient cleavage and release of the polypeptide of interest. Depending on the presence and nature of any intra-polypeptide cleavage sites (eg. between the first and second domains), cleavage of the purification tag from the fusion protein may occur simultaneously to proteolytic cleavage between the first and second domains. Alternatively, release of the purification tag may occur without proteolytic cleavage between the first and second domains. These two cleavage schemes are illustrated in
Depending on the cleavage enzyme chosen, this strategy may result in a short amino acid extension to the N-terminus (or C-terminus) of the polypeptide. For example, in the case of SEQ ID 92, cleavage of the expressed product with enterokinase results in two polypeptides coupled by a single disulphide bond at the first domain-second domain junction (ie. the L chain-HN junction), with a short N-terminal peptide extension that resembles an intact Factor Xa site and a short N-terminal extension due to polylinker sequence (IEGRISEFGS) (SEQ ID NO: 198).
Secondly, the DNA encoding a self-splicing intein sequence may be employed, which intein may be induced to self-splice under pH and/or temperature control. The intein sequence (represented in SEQ ID 110 as the polypeptide sequence ISEFRESGAISGDSLISLASTGKRVSIKDLLDEKDFEIWAINEQTMKLESAKVSRVF CTGKKLVYILKTRLGRTIKATANHRFLTIDGWKRLDELSLKEHIALPRKLESSSLQ LSPEIEKL SQSDIYWDSIVSITETGVEEVFDLTVPGPHNFVANDIIVHN (SEQ ID NO: 199)) facilitates self-cleavage of the illustrated polypeptide (i.e., purification tag—LHN/B) to yield a single polypeptide molecule with no purification tag. This process does not therefore require treatment of the initial expression product with proteases, and the resultant polypeptide (i.e., L-chain-Factor Xa activation site—HN) is simply illustrative of how this approach may be applied.
According to a further embodiment of the invention, which is described in an example below, there is provided a polypeptide lacking a portion designated He of a clostridial toxin heavy chain. This portion, seen in the naturally produced toxin, is responsible for binding of toxin to cell surface receptors prior to internalisation of the toxin. This specific embodiment is therefore adapted so that it can not be converted into active toxin, for example by the action of a proteolytic enzyme. The invention thus also provides a polypeptide comprising a clostridial toxin light chain and a fragment of a clostridial toxin heavy chain, said fragment being not capable of binding to those cell surface receptors involved in the intoxicating action of clostridial toxin, and it is preferred that such a polypeptide lacks an intact portion designated He of a clostridial toxin heavy chain.
In further embodiments of the invention there are provided compositions containing a polypeptide comprising a clostridial toxin light chain and a portion designated HN of a clostridial toxin heavy chain, and wherein the composition is free of clostridial toxin and free of any clostridial toxin precursor that may be converted into clostridial toxin by the action of a proteolytic enzyme. Examples of these compositions include those containing toxin light chain and HN sequences of botulinum toxin types A, B, C1, D, E, F and G.
The polypeptides of the invention are conveniently adapted to bind to, or include, a third domain (e.g., a ligand for targeting to desired cells). The polypeptide optionally comprises a sequence that binds to, for example, an immunoglobulin. A suitable sequence is a tandem repeat synthetic IgG binding domain derived from domain B of Staphylococcal protein A. Choice of immunoglobulin specificity then determines the target for a polypeptide-immunoglobulin complex. Alternatively, the polypeptide comprises a non-clostridial sequence that binds to a cell surface receptor, suitable sequences including insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) which binds to its specific receptor on particular cell types and the 14 amino acid residue sequence from the carboxy-terminus of cholera toxin A subunit which is able to bind the cholera toxin B subunit and thence to GM1 gangliosides. A polypeptide according to the invention thus, optionally, further comprises a third domain adapted for binding of the polypeptide to a cell.
In a preferred embodiment, the third domain binds to a receptor on a target cell, which receptor is susceptible to endosomal processing.
According to a second aspect the invention there is provided a fusion protein comprising a fusion of (a) a polypeptide of the invention as described above with (b) a second polypeptide (also known as a purification tag) adapted for binding to a chromatography matrix so as to enable purification of the fusion protein using said chromatography matrix. It is convenient for the second polypeptide to be adapted to bind to an affinity matrix, such as a glutathione Sepharose, enabling rapid separation and purification of the fusion protein from an impure source, such as a cell extract or supernatant.
One possible second purification polypeptide is glutathione-S-transferase (GST), and others will be apparent to a person of skill in the art, being chosen so as to enable purification on a chromatography column according to conventional techniques.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, spacer sequences may be introduced between two or more domains of the single chain polypeptide molecule. For example, a spacer sequence may be introduced between the second and third domains of a polypeptide molecule of the present invention. Alternatively (or in addition), a spacer sequence may be introduced between a purification tag and the polypeptide of the present invention or between the first and second domains. A spacer sequence may include a proteolytic cleavage site.
In more detail, insertion of a specific peptide sequence into the second domain-third domain junction may been performed with the purpose of spacing the third domain (eg. ligand) from the second domain (e.g., HN). This approach may facilitate efficient interaction of the third domain with the specific binding target and/or improve the folding characteristics of the polypeptide. Example spacer peptides are provided in Table 2.
In a preferred embodiment, a spacer sequence may be introduced between the first and second domains. For example, a variety of first domain (eg. L-chain) expression constructs have been prepared that incorporate features that are advantageous to the preparation of novel single polypeptide hybrid first domain-second domain fusions. Such expression cassettes are illustrated by SEQ ID NO 69, 71, 73, 75, 77 & 113.
The above cassettes take advantage of a natural linker sequence that exists in the region between the C-terminus of the L-chain and the N-terminus of the HN domain of a native clostridial neurotoxin. In more detail, there is a cysteine at each end of the natural linker sequence that serve to couple the L-chain and HN domain together following proteolytic cleavage of the single chain polypeptide molecule into its dichain counterpart. These cysteine groups are preserved in the above-mentioned cassettes.
Thus, by maintaining the cysteine amino acids at either end of the linker sequence, and optionally incorporating a specific proteolytic site to replace the native sequence, a variety of constructs have been prepared that have the property of being specifically cleavable between the first and second domains.
For example, by fusing a sequence of interest, such as HN/B to the sequence described in SEQ ID 69, it is possible to routinely prepare L-chain/A-HN/B novel hybrids that are linked through a specific linker region that facilitates disulphide bond formation. Thus, the expressed fusion proteins are suitable for proteolytic cleavage between the first (L-chain) and second (HN) domains. The same linkers, optionally including said cleavage site, may be used to link together other domains of the polypeptide or fusion protein of the present invention.
In a further embodiment of the present invention, molecular clamps may be used to clamp together two or more domains of the polypeptides or fusion proteins of the present invention. Molecular clamps may be considered a particular sub-set of the aforementioned spacer sequences.
In more detail, molecular clamping (also known as directed coupling) is a method for joining together two or more polypeptide domains through the use of specific complementary peptide sequences that facilitate non-covalent protein-protein interactions.
Examples of such peptide sequences include leucine zippers (jun & fos), polyionic peptides (eg. poly-glutamate and its poly-arginine pair) and the synthetic IgG binding domain of Staphylococcal protein A.
Polypeptides comprising first and second domains (e.g., LHN) have been prepared with molecular clamping sequences fused to the C-terminus of the second (e.g., HN) domain through two methods.
First, DNA encoding the molecular clamp has been ligated directly to the DNA encoding an LHN polypeptide, after removing the STOP codon present in the LHN coding sequence. By insertion, to the 3′ of the LHN sequence, of overlapping oligonucleotides encoding the clamp sequence and a 3′STOP codon, an expression cassette has been generated. An example of such a sequence is presented in SEQ ID 63 in which the DNA sequence coding for the molecular clamp known as fos (LTDTLQAETDQLEDEKSALQTEIANLLKEKEKLEFILAAH (SEQ ID NO: 202)) has been introduced to the 3′ of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a LHN/A polypeptide, which molecule also has a nucleic acid sequence encoding an enterokinase cleavage site between the coding regions of the first domain (L-chain) and the second domain (HN).
Secondly, site-specific recombination has been utilised to incorporate a clamp sequence to the 3′ of a LHN polypeptide (see, for example, the GATEWAY® cloning system described below) spaced from the HN domain by the short peptide Gly-Gly. Use of this peptide to space clamp sequences from the C-terminus of HN is illustrated in SEQ 117/118.
In some embodiments, it may be preferable to incorporate cysteine side chains into the clamp peptide to facilitate formation of disulphide bonds across the clamp, and so make a covalent linkage between the, for example, second domain (HN) and a third domain (eg. a ligand). Incorporation of the cysteine codon into the clamp sequence has been performed by standard techniques, to result in sequences of the type represented by SEQ ID 59/60, 61/62, 117/118 and 119/120.
A schematic for the application of molecular clamping to the preparation of suitable LHN polypeptides is illustrated in
A further alternative for expression of a full-length polypeptide containing first and second domains that is suitable for site-specific coupling to a third domain (eg. a ligand) is to incorporate an intein self-cleaving sequence into the 3′ of the second domain (e.g., HN). SEQ ID 67/68 illustrates one such construct, in which LHN/A having an enterokinase cleavage site between the first (eg. L-chain) and second (eg. HN) domains is expressed with a Cys residue at the C-terminus, followed by the intein sequence.
Following self-cleavage, a reactive thioester is then formed that can take part in a directed coupling reaction to a third domain, for example, as described by Bruick et al., Chem. Biol. (1996), pp. 49-56. Such a polypeptide facilitates site-specific chemical coupling to third domains (eg. ligands of interest) without the problems associated with random derivatisation and random coupling which may otherwise result in a heterogenous final product.
As will be appreciated by a skilled person from the entire disclosure of the present application, first and second domains may employ L-chain and H-chain components from any clostridial neurotoxin source. Whilst botulinum sources may be preferred, tetanus sources have equal applicability. In this respect, the whole sequence of tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT) as published prior to the present application by Eisel, U. et al. (1986) EMBO J. 5 (10), pp. 2495-2502, and Accession No. X04436 is included in the present application as SEQ ID 140/141 for ease of reference.
To help illustrate this point, several TeNT based polypeptides have been prepared according to the present invention, and reference is made to SEQ ID 143 which is an LHN polypeptide having a C-terminal sequence of EEDIDV879 (SEQ ID NO: 207). Reference is also made to SEQ ID 147 which is an LHN polypeptide having a C-terminal sequence of EEDIDVILKKSTIL887 (SEQ ID NO: 203). Both of these LHN sequences are representative of ‘native’ TeNT LHN sequences, which have no introduced specific cleavage site between the L-chain and the HN domain. Thus, SEQ ID 145 illustrates a TeNT polypeptide according to the present invention in which the natural TeNT linker region between the L-chain and the HN domain has been replaced with a polypeptide containing a specific enterokinase cleavage sequence.
It will be also appreciated that the general approaches described in the present specification for introducing specific cleavage sites and spacer/clamping sequences between any two domains (e.g., the L-chain and the HN domain, or the L-chain and a purification tag) are routinely applicable to the preparation of TeNT-containing polypeptide molecules according to the present invention.
A third aspect of the invention provides a composition comprising a derivative of a clostridial toxin, said derivative retaining at least 10% of the endopeptidase activity of the clostridial toxin, said derivative further being non-toxic in vivo due to its inability to bind to cell surface receptors, and wherein the composition is free of any component, such as toxin or a further toxin derivative, that is toxic in vivo. The activity of the derivative preferably approaches that of natural toxin, and is thus preferably at least 30% and most preferably at least 60% of natural toxin. The overall endopeptidase activity of the composition will, of course, also be determined by the amount of the derivative that is present.
While it is known to treat naturally produced clostridial toxin to remove the He domain, this treatment does not totally remove toxicity of the preparation, instead some residual toxin activity remains. Natural toxin treated in this way is therefore still not entirely safe. The composition of the invention, derived by treatment of a pure source of polypeptide advantageously is free of toxicity, and can conveniently be used as a positive control in a toxin assay, as a vaccine against clostridial toxin or for other purposes where it is essential that there is no residual toxicity in the composition.
The invention enables production of the polypeptides and fusion proteins of the invention by recombinant means.
A fourth aspect of the invention provides a nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide or a fusion protein according to any of the aspects of the invention described above.
In one embodiment of this aspect of the invention, a DNA sequence provided to code for the polypeptide or fusion protein is not derived from native clostridial sequences, but is an artificially derived sequence not preexisting in nature.
A specific DNA (SEQ ID NO: 1) described in more detail below encodes a polypeptide or a fusion protein comprising nucleotides encoding residues 1-871 of a botulinum toxin type A. Said polypeptide comprises the light chain domain and the first 423 amino acid residues of the amino terminal portion of a botulinum toxin type A heavy chain. This recombinant product is designated LH423/A (SEQ ID NO: 2).
In a second embodiment of this aspect of the invention a DNA sequence which codes for the polypeptide or fusion protein is derived from native clostridial sequences but codes for a polypeptide or fusion protein not found in nature.
A specific DNA (SEQ ID NO: 19) described in more detail below encodes a polypeptide or a fusion protein and comprises nucleotides encoding residues 1-1171 of a botulinum toxin type B. Said polypeptide comprises the light chain domain and the first 728 amino acid residues of the amino terminal protein of a botulinum type B heavy chain. This recombinant product is designated LH728/B (SEQ ID NO: 20).
The invention thus also provides a method of manufacture of a polypeptide comprising expressing in a host cell a DNA according to the third aspect of the invention. The host cell is suitably not able to cleave a polypeptide or fusion protein of the invention so as to separate light and heavy toxin chains; for example, a non-clostridial host.
The invention further provides a method of manufacture of a polypeptide comprising expressing in a host cell a DNA encoding a fusion protein as described above, purifying the fusion protein by elution through a chromatography column adapted to retain the fusion protein, eluting through said chromatography column a ligand adapted to displace the fusion protein and recovering the fusion protein. Production of substantially pure fusion protein is thus made possible. Likewise, the fusion protein is readily cleaved to yield a polypeptide of the invention, again in substantially pure form, as the second polypeptide may conveniently be removed using the same type of chromatography column.
The LHN/A derived from dichain native toxin requires extended digestion with trypsin to remove the C-terminal 1/2 of the heavy chain, the He domain. The loss of this domain effectively renders the toxin inactive in vivo by preventing its interaction with host target cells. There is, however, a residual toxic activity which may indicate a contaminating, trypsin insensitive, form of the whole type A neurotoxin.
In contrast, the recombinant preparations of the invention are the product of a discreet, defined gene coding sequence and can not be contaminated by full length toxin protein. Furthermore, the product as recovered from E. coli, and from other recombinant expression hosts, is an inactive single chain peptide or if expression hosts produce a processed, active polypeptide it is not a toxin. Endopeptidase activity of LH423/A, as assessed by the current in vitro peptide cleavage assay, is wholly dependent on activation of the recombinant molecule between residues 430 and 454 by trypsin. Other proteolytic enzymes that cleave between these two residues are generally also suitable for activation of the recombinant molecule. Trypsin cleaves the peptide bond C-terminal to Arginine or C-terminal to Lysine and is suitable as these residues are found in the 430-454 region and are exposed (see
The recombinant polypeptides of the invention are potential therapeutic agents for targeting to cells expressing the relevant substrate but which are not implicated in effecting botulism. An example might be where secretion of neurotransmitter is inappropriate or undesirable or alternatively where a neuronal cell is hyperactive in terms of regulated secretion of substances other than neurotransmitter. In such an example the function of the He domain of the native toxin could be replaced by an alternative targeting sequence providing, for example, a cell receptor ligand and/or translocation domain.
One application of the recombinant polypeptides of the invention will be as a reagent component for synthesis of therapeutic molecules, such as disclosed in WO-A-94/21300. The recombinant product will also find application as a non-toxic standard for the assessment and development of in vitro assays for detection of functional botulinum or tetanus neurotoxins either in foodstuffs or in environmental samples, for example as disclosed in EP-A-0763131.
A further option is addition, to the C-terminal end of a polypeptide of the invention, of a peptide sequence which allows specific chemical conjugation to targeting ligands of both protein and non-protein origin.
In yet a further embodiment an alternative targeting ligand is added to the N-terminus of polypeptides of the invention. Recombinant LHN derivatives have been designated that have specific protease cleavage sites engineered at the C-terminus of the LC at the putative trypsin sensitive region and also at the extreme C-terminus of the complete protein product. These sites will enhance the activational specificity of the recombinant product such that the dichain species can only be activated by proteolytic cleavage of a more predictable nature than use of trypsin.
The LHN enzymatically produced from native BoNT/A is an efficient immunogen and thus the recombinant form with its total divorce from any full length neurotoxin represents a vaccine component. The recombinant product may serve as a basal reagent for creating defined protein modifications in support of any of the above areas.
Recombinant constructs are assigned distinguishing names on the basis of their amino acid sequence length and their Light Chain (L-chain, L) and Heavy Chain (H-chain, H) content as these relate to translated DNA sequences in the public domain or specifically to SEQ ID NO: 2 and SEQ ID NO: 20. The ‘LH’ designation is followed by ‘/X’ where ‘X’ denotes the corresponding clostridial toxin serotype or class, e.g., ‘A’ for botulinum neurotoxin type A or ‘TeTx’ for tetanus toxin. Sequence variants from that of the native toxin polypeptide are given in parenthesis in standard format, namely the residue position number prefixed by the residue of the native sequence and suffixed by the residue of the variant.
Subscript number prefixes indicate an amino-terminal (N-terminal) extension, or where negative a deletion, to the translated sequence. Similarly, subscript number suffixes indicate a carboxy terminal (C-terminal) extension or where negative numbers are used, a deletion. Specific sequence inserts such as protease cleavage sites are indicated using abbreviations, e.g. Factor Xa is abbreviated to FXa. L-chain C-terminal suffixes and H-chain N-terminal prefixes are separated by a/to indicate the predicted junction between the L and H-chains. Abbreviations for engineered ligand sequences are prefixed or suffixed to the clostridial L-chain or H-chain corresponding to their position in the translation product.
Following this nomenclature,
The basic molecular biology techniques required to carry out the present invention were readily available in the art before the priority date of the present application and, as such, would be routine to a skilled person.
Example 1 of the present application illustrates conventional restriction endonuclease-dependent cleavage and ligation methodologies for preparing nucleic acid sequences encoding polypeptides of the present invention.
Example 4 et seq. illustrate a number of alternative conventional methods for engineering recombinant DNA molecules that do not require traditional methods of restriction endonuclease-dependent cleavage and ligation of DNA. One such method is the site-specific recombination GATEWAY® cloning system of Invitrogen, Inc., which uses phage lambda-based site-specific recombination [Landy, A. (1989) Ann. Rev. Biochem. 58, pp. 913-949]. This method is now described in slightly more detail.
Using standard restriction endonuclease digestion, or polymerase chain reaction techniques, a DNA sequence encoding first and second domains (e.g., a BoNT LHN molecule) may be cloned into an ENTRY VECTOR (cloning vector). There are a number of options for creation of the correct coding region flanked by requisite att site recombination sequences, as described in the GATEWAY® (cloning system) manual.
For example, one route is to insert a generic polylinker into the ENTRY VECTOR (cloning vector), in which the inserted DNA contains two att sites separated by the polylinker sequence. This approach facilitates insertion of a variety of fragments into the ENTRY VECTOR (cloning vector), at user-defined restriction endonuclease sites.
A second route is to insert att sites into the primers used for amplification of the DNA of interest. In this approach, the DNA sequence of the amplified fragment is modified to include the appropriate att sites at the 5′ and 3′ ends.
Examples of ENTRY VECTORS (cloning vectors) are provided for LHN/C (SEQ ID 135), for LHN/C with no STOP codon thereby facilitating direct fusion to ligands (SEQ ID 136), and for a L-chain/C sequence that can facilitate combination with an appropriate second or third domain (SEQ ID 134).
By combination of the modified ENTRY VECTOR (cloning vector) (containing the DNA of interest) and a DESTINATION VECTOR (cloning vector) of choice, an expression clone is generated. The DESTINATION VECTOR (cloning vector) typically provides the necessary information to facilitate transcription of the inserted DNA of interest and, when introduced into an appropriate host cell, facilitates expression of protein.
DESTINATION VECTORS (cloning vectors) may be prepared to ensure expression of N-terminal and/or C-terminal fusion tags and/or additional protein domains. An example of a novel engineered DESTINATION VECTOR (cloning vector) for the expression of MBP-tagged proteins in a non-transmissible vector backbone is presented in SEQ ID 137. In this specific embodiment, recombination of an ENTRY VECTOR (cloning vector) possessing a sequence of interest with the DESTINATION VECTOR (cloning vector) identified in SEQ ID 137 results in an expression vector for E. coli expression.
The combination of ENTRY VECTORS (cloning vectors) and DESTINATION VECTORS (cloning vectors) to prepare an expression clone results in an expressed protein that has a modified sequence. In the Examples illustrated with SEQ ID 30 & 124, a peptide sequence of TSLYKKAGF (SEQ ID NO: 204) is to be found at the N-terminus of the endopeptidase following cleavage to remove the purification tag. This peptide sequence is encoded by the DNA that forms the att site and is a feature of all clones that are constructed and expressed in this way.
It will be appreciated that the att site sequence may be modified to insert DNA encoding a specific protease cleavage site (for example from Table 1) to the 3′ of the att site of the entry clone.
It will be also appreciated that the precise N-terminus of any polypeptide (e.g., a LHN fragment) will vary depending on how the endopeptidase DNA was introduced into the ENTRY VECTOR (cloning vector) and its relationship to the 5′ att site. SEQ ID 29/30 & 123/124 are a case in point. The N-terminal extension of SEQ ID 30 is TSLYKKAGFGS (SEQ ID NO: 205) whereas the N-terminal extension of SEQ ID 124 is ITSLYKKAGFGSLDH (SEQ ID NO: 206). These amino acid extension-containing domains provide further examples of first/second domain variants according to the present invention.
Within the context of the present invention, the following definitions are to be noted.
The term polypeptide “fragment” means that the polypeptide “fragment” in question is preferably at least 50% the length of the reference SEQ ID polypeptide sequence. Thus, if the reference SEQ ID polypeptide is an amino acid sequence having for example 500 amino acid residues, then the corresponding “fragment” would be an amino acid sequence having at least 250 amino acid residues. In more preferred embodiments, the “fragment” is at least 70%, more preferably at least 85%, particularly preferably at least 90% and most preferably at least 95% the length of the reference SEQ ID polypeptide.
The polypeptide “fragment” preferably includes an epitope of the reference SEQ ID polypeptide sequence, which may be confirmed by antibody cross-reactivity. The polypeptide “fragment” preferably includes a first domain that is capable of cleaving one or more vesicle or plasma membrane associated proteins essential to exocytosis.
The term “variant” means a polypeptide or polypeptide “fragment” having at least seventy, preferably at least eighty, more preferably at least ninety percent amino acid sequence homology with the reference SEQ ID polypeptide. An example of a “variant” is a polypeptide or polypeptide fragment that contains one or more analogues of an amino acid (eg. an unnatural amino acid), or a substituted linkage. The terms “homology” and “identity” are considered synonymous in this specification.
For sequence comparison, typically one sequence (e.g., the reference SEQ ID polypeptide) acts as a reference sequence, to which “variant” sequences may be compared. When using a sequence comparison algorithm, “variant” and reference sequences are input into a computer, subsequent coordinates are designated, if necessary, and sequence algorithm program parameters are designated. The sequence comparison algorithm then calculates the percentage sequence identity for the “variant” sequence (s) relative to the reference SEQ ID polypeptide sequence, based on the designated program parameters.
Optimal alignment of sequences for comparison may be conducted, for example, by the local homology alignment algorithm of Smith and Waterman [Adv. Appl. Math. 2: 484 (1981)], by the algorithm of Needleman & Wunsch [J. Mol. Biol. 48: 443 (1970)] by the search for similarity method of Pearson & Lipman [Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 2444 (1988)], by computer implementations of these algorithms (GAP, BESTFIT, FASTA, and TFASTA-Sequence Analysis Software Package of the Genetics Computer Group, University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center, 1710 University Avenue, Madison, Wis. 53705), or by visual inspection [see Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, F. M. Ausbel et al, eds, Current Protocols, a joint venture between Greene Publishing Associates, Inc. and John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1995 Supplement) Ausbubel].
Examples of algorithms suitable for determining percent sequence similarity are the BLAST and BLAST 2.0 algorithms [see Altschul (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215: pp. 403-410; and “http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/” of the National Center for Biotechnology Information].
In a preferred homology comparison, the identity exists over a region of the sequences that is at least 50 amino acid residues in length, more preferably at least 100 amino acid residues in length, particularly preferably at least 150 amino acid residues in length, and most preferably at least 200 amino acid residues in length. Alternatively, the identity exists over the entire sequence of, for example, the “variant” polypeptide.
The term DNA “fragment” used in this invention is to be interpreted consistently with the term polypeptide “fragment” (discussed above), and means that the DNA “fragment” in question is preferably at least 50% the length of the reference SEQ ID DNA sequence. Thus, if the reference SEQ ID DNA sequence is a nucleic acid sequence having for example 500 nucleotide residues, then the corresponding “fragment” would be a nucleic acid sequence having at least 250 nucleotide residues. In more preferred embodiments, the “fragment” is at least 70%, more preferably at least 85%, particularly preferably at least 90% and most preferably at least 95% the length of the reference SEQ ID DNA sequence.
The term DNA “variant” means a DNA sequence that has substantial homology or substantial similarity to the reference DNA sequence (or a fragment thereof). A nucleic acid or fragment thereof is “substantially homologous” (or “substantially similar”) to another if, when optimally aligned (with appropriate nucleotide insertions or deletions) with the other nucleic acid (or its complementary strand), there is nucleotide sequence identity in at least about 60% of the nucleotide bases, usually at least about 70%, more usually at least about 80%, preferably at least about 90%, and more preferably at least about 95 to 98% of the nucleotide bases. Homology determination is performed as described supra for peptides.
Alternatively, a DNA “variant” is substantially homologous (or substantially similar) with the coding sequence (or a fragment thereof) of reference SEQ ID DNA sequence when they are capable of hybridizing under selective hybridization conditions. Selectivity of hybridization exists when hybridization occurs which is substantially more selective than total lack of specificity. Typically, selective hybridization will occur when there is at least about 65% homology over a stretch of at least about 50 nucleotides, preferably at least about 70%, more preferably at least about 75%, and most preferably at least about 90%. See, Kanehisa (1984) Nuc. Acids Res. 12: 203-213. The length of homology comparison, as described, may be over longer stretches, and in certain embodiments will often be over a stretch of at least about 100 nucleotides, usually at least about 150 nucleotides, more usually at least about 200 nucleotides, typically at least about 250 nucleotides, more typically at least about 300 nucleotides, and preferably at least about 350 or more nucleotides. Alternatively, the identity exists over the entire sequence of, for example, the “variant” DNA sequence.
Nucleic acid hybridization will be affected by such conditions as salt concentration (e.g., NaCl), temperature, or organic solvents, in addition to the base composition, length of the complementary strands, and the number of nucleotide base mismatches between the hybridizing nucleic acids, as will be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art. Stringent temperature conditions are preferably employed, and generally include temperatures in excess of 30° C., typically in excess of 37° C. and preferably in excess of 45° C. Stringent salt conditions will ordinarily be less than 1000 mM, typically less than 500 mM, and preferably less than 200 mM. The pH is typically between 7.0 and 8.3. However, the combination of parameters is much more important than the measure of any single parameter. See, e.g., Wetmur and Davidson (1968) J. Mol. Biol. 31: 349-370.
The above terms DNA “fragment” and “variant” have in common with each other that the resulting polypeptide products preferably have cross-reactive antigenic properties which are substantially the same as those of the corresponding reference SEQ ID polypeptide. Preferably all of the polypeptide products of the above DNA “fragment” and “variant” embodiments of the present invention bind to an antibody which also binds to the reference SEQ ID polypeptide.
There now follows description of specific embodiments of the invention, illustrated by drawings in which:
The sequence listing that accompanies this application contains the following sequences:
23LH423/A (Q2E, N26K, A27Y)
2LH423/A (Q2E, N26K, A27Y)
2LH423/A (Q2E), which is a single polypeptide comprising a
2LH423/A (Q2E), which is equivalent to SED ID NO 149.
2LFXa/3H423/A (Q2E), which is equivalent to SEQ ID NO 151 and
2LFXa/3H423/A(Q2E)FXa-6His, which is equivalent to SEQ ID NO
E. coli codon bias.
2LH423/A(Q2E, H227Y), which is equivalent to SEQ ID NO 163.
E. coli codon bias.
2LH423/A(Q2E, E224Q), which is equivalent to SEQ ID NO 151
2LH423/A(Q2E, E224Q, H227Y), which is equivalent to SEQ ID NO
A 2616 base pair, double stranded gene sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) has been assembled from a combination of synthetic, chromosomal and polymerase-chain-reaction generated DNA (
Construction of the Recombinant Product
The first 918 base pairs of the recombinant gene were synthesised by concatenation of short oligonucleotides to generate a coding sequence with an E. coli codon bias. Both DNA strands in this region were completely synthesised as short overlapping oligonucleotides which were phosphorylated, annealed and ligated to generate the full synthetic region ending with a unique Kpnl restriction site. The remainder of the LH423/A coding sequence was PCR amplified from total chromosomal DNA from Clostridium botulinum and annealed to the synthetic portion of the gene.
The internal PCR amplified product sequences were then deleted and replaced with the native, fully sequenced, regions from clones of C. botulinum chromosomal origin to generate the final gene construct. The final composition is synthetic DNA (bases 1-913), polymerase amplified DNA (bases 914-1138 and 1976-2616) and the remainder is of C. botulinum chromosomal origin (bases 1139-1975). The assembled gene was then fully sequenced and cloned into a variety of E. coli plasmid vectors for expression analysis.
Expression of the Recombinant Gene and Recovery of Protein Product
The DNA is expressed in E. coli as a single nucleic acid transcript producing a soluble single chain polypeptide of 99,951 Daltons predicted molecular weight. The gene is currently expressed in E. coli as a fusion to the commercially available coding sequence of glutathione S-transferase (GST) of Schistosoma japonicum but any of an extensive range of recombinant gene expression vectors such as pEZZ18, pTrc99, pFLAG or the pMAL series may be equally effective as might expression in other prokaryotic or eukaryotic hosts such as the Gram positive bacilli, the yeast P. pastoris or in insect or mammalian cells under appropriate conditions.
Currently, E. coli harbouring the expression construct is grown in Luria-Bertani broth (L-broth pH 7.0, containing 10 g/l bacto-tryptone, 5 g/l bacto-yeast extract and 10 g/i sodium chloride) at 37° C. until the cell density (biomass) has an optical absorbance of 0.4-0.6 at 600 nm and the cells are in mid-logarithmic growth phase. Expression of the gene is then induced by addition of isopropylthio-β-D-galactosidase (IPTG) to a final concentration of 0.5 mM. Recombinant gene expression is allowed to proceed for 90 min at a reduced temperature of 25° C. The cells are then harvested by centrifugation, are resuspended in a buffer solution containing 10 mM Na2HPO4, 0.5 M NaCl, 10 mM EGTA, 0.25% Tween, pH 7.0 and then frozen at −20° C. For extraction of the recombinant protein the cells are disrupted by sonication. The cell extract is then cleared of debris by centrifugation and the cleared supernatant fluid containing soluble recombinant fusion protein (GST-LH423/A) is stored at −20° C. pending purification. A proportion of recombinant material is not released by the sonication procedure and this probably reflects insolubility or inclusion body formation. Currently we do not extract this material for analysis but if desired this could be readily achieved using methods known to those skilled in the art.
The recombinant GST-LH423/A is purified by adsorption onto a commercially prepared affinity matrix of glutathione Sepharose and subsequent elution with reduced glutathione. The GST affinity purification marker is then removed by proteolytic cleavage and reabsorption to glutathione Sepharose; recombinant LH423/A is recovered in the non-adsorbed material.
Construct Variants
A variant of the molecule, LH423/A (Q2E, N26K, A27Y) (SEQ ID NO: 26) has been produced in which three amino acid residues have been modified within the light chain of LH423/A producing a polypeptide containing a light chain sequence different to that of the published amino acid sequence of the light chain of BoNT/A.
Two further variants of the gene sequence that have been expressed and the corresponding products purified are 23LH423/A (Q2E, N26K, A27Y) (SEQ ID NO: 4) which has a 23 amino acid N-terminal extension as compared to the predicted native L-chain of BoNT/A and 2LH423/A (Q2E, N26K, A27Y) (SEQ ID NO: 6) which has a 2 amino acid N-terminal extension (
In yet another variant a gene has been produced which contains a Eco 47 III restriction site between nucleotides 1344 and 1345 of the gene sequence given in (SEQ ID NO: 1). This modification provides a restriction site at the position in the gene representing the interface of the heavy and light chains in native neurotoxin, and provides the capability to make insertions at this point using standard restriction enzyme methodologies known to those skilled in the art. It will also be obvious to those skilled in the art that any one of a number of restriction sites could be so employed, and that the Eco 47 III insertion simply exemplifies this approach. Similarly, it would be obvious for one skilled in the art that insertion of a restriction site in the manner described could be performed on any gene of the invention. The gene described, when expressed, codes for a polypeptide, L/4H423/A (SEQ ID NO: 10), which contains an additional four amino acids between amino acids 448 and 449 of LH423/A at a position equivalent to the amino terminus of the heavy chain of native BoNT/A.
A variant of the gene has been expressed, LFXa/3H423/A (SEQ ID NO: 12), in which a specific proteolytic cleavage site was incorporated at the carboxy-terminal end of the light chain domain, specifically after residue 448 of L/4H423/A. The cleavage site incorporated was for Factor Xa protease and was coded for by modification of SEQ ID NO: 1. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that a cleavage site for another specified protease could be similarly incorporated, and that any gene sequence coding for the required cleavage site could be employed. Modification of the gene sequence in this manner to code for a defined protease site could be performed on any gene of the invention.
Variants of LFXa/3H423/A have been constructed in which a third domain is present at the carboxy-terminal end of the polypeptide which incorporates a specific binding activity into the polypeptide.
Specific examples described are:
LFXa/3H423/A-IGF-1 (SEQ ID NO: 14), in which the carboxy-terminal domain has a sequence equivalent to that of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and is able to bind to the insulin-like growth factor receptor with high affinity;
LFXa/3H423/A-CtxA14 (SEQ ID NO: 16), in which the carboxy-terminal domain has a sequence equivalent to that of the 14 amino acids from the carboxy-terminus of the A-subunit of cholera toxin (CtxA) and is thereby able to interact with the cholera toxin B-subunit pentamer; and
LFXa/3H423/A-ZZ (SEQ ID NO: 18), in which the carboxy-terminal domain is a tandem repeating synthetic IgG binding domain. This variant also exemplifies another modification applicable to the current invention, namely the inclusion in the gene of a sequence coding for a protease cleavage site located between the end of the clostridial heavy chain sequence and the sequence coding for the binding ligand. Specifically in this example a sequence is inserted at nucleotides 2650 to 2666 coding for a genenase cleavage site. Expression of this gene produces a polypeptide which has the desired protease sensitivity at the interface between the domain providing HN function and the binding domain. Such a modification enables selective removal of the C-terminal binding domain by treatment of the polypeptide with the relevant protease.
It will be apparent that any one of a number of such binding domains could be incorporated into the polypeptide sequences of this invention and that the above examples are merely to exemplify the concept. Similarly, such binding domains can be incorporated into any of the polypeptide sequences that are the basis of this invention. Further, it should be noted that such binding domains could be incorporated at any appropriate location within the polypeptide molecules of the invention.
Further embodiments of the invention are thus illustrated by a DNA of the invention further comprising a desired restriction endonuclease site at a desired location and by a polypeptide of the invention further comprising a desired protease cleavage site at a desired location.
The restriction endonuclease site may be introduced so as to facilitate further manipulation of the DNA in manufacture of an expression vector for expressing a polypeptide of the invention; it may be introduced as a consequence of a previous step in manufacture of the DNA; it may be introduced by way of modification by insertion, substitution or deletion of a known sequence. The consequence of modification of the DNA may be that the amino acid sequence is unchanged, or may be that the amino acid sequence is changed, for example resulting in introduction of a desired protease cleavage site, either way the polypeptide retains its first and second domains having the properties required by the invention.
Assay of Product Activity
The LC of botulinum neurotoxin type A exerts a zinc-dependent endopeptidase activity on the synaptic vesicle associated protein SNAP-25 which it cleaves in a specific manner at a single peptide bond. The 2LH423/A (Q2E, N26K, A27Y) (SEQ ID NO: 6) cleaves a synthetic SNAP-25 substrate in vitro under the same conditions as the native toxin (
This activity is dependent on proteolytic modification of the recombinant GST-2LH423/A (Q2E, N26K, A27Y) to convert the single chain polypeptide product to a disulphide linked dichain species. This is currently done using the proteolytic enzyme trypsin. The recombinant product (100-600, ug/ml) is incubated at 37° C. for 10-50 minutes with trypsin (10, ug/ml) in a solution containing 140 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.3. The reaction is terminated by addition of a 100-fold molar excess of trypsin inhibitor. The activation by trypsin generates a disulphide linked dichain species as determined by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting analysis using polyclonal anti-botulinum neurotoxin type A antiserum.
2LH423/A is more stable in the presence of trypsin and more active in the in vitro peptide cleavage assay than is 23LH423/A. Both variants, however, are fully functional in the in vitro peptide cleavage assay. This demonstrates that the recombinant molecule will tolerate N-terminal amino acid extensions and this may be expanded to other chemical or organic moieties as would be obvious to those skilled in the art.
As a further exemplification of this invention a number of gene sequences have been assembled coding for polypeptides corresponding to the entire light-chain and varying numbers of residues from the amino terminal end of the heavy chain of botulinum neurotoxin type B. In this exemplification of the disclosure the gene sequences assembled were obtained from a combination of chromosomal and polymerase-chain-reaction generated DNA, and therefore have the nucleotide sequence of the equivalent regions of the natural genes, thus exemplifying the principle that the substance of this disclosure can be based upon natural as well as a synthetic gene sequences.
The gene sequences relating to this example were all assembled and expressed using methodologies as detailed in Sambrook J, Fritsch E F & Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2nd Edition), Ford N, Nolan C, Ferguson M & Ockler M (eds), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, and known to those skilled in the art.
A gene has been assembled coding for a polypeptide of 1171 amino acids corresponding to the entire light-chain (443 amino acids) and 728 residues from the amino terminus of the heavy chain of neurotoxin type B. Expression of this gene produces a polypeptide, LH728/B (SEQ ID NO: 20), which lacks the specific neuronal binding activity of full length BoNT/B.
A gene has also been assembled coding for a variant polypeptide, LH417/B (SEQ ID NO: 22), which possesses an amino acid sequence at its carboxy terminus equivalent by amino acid homology to that at the carboxy-terminus of the heavy chain fragment in native LHN/A.
A gene has also been assembled coding for a variant polypeptide, LH107/B (SEQ ID NO: 24), which expresses at its carboxy-terminus a short sequence from the amino terminus of the heavy chain of BoNT/B sufficient to maintain solubility of the expressed polypeptide.
Construct Variants
A variant of the coding sequence for the first 274 bases of the gene shown in SEQ ID NO: 21 has been produced which whilst being a non-native nucleotide sequence still codes for the native polypeptide.
Two double stranded, a 268 base pair and a 951 base pair, gene sequences have been created using an overlapping primer PCR strategy. The nucleotide bias of these sequences was designed to have an E. coli codon usage bias.
For the first sequence, six oligonucleotides representing the first (5′) 268 nucleotides of the native sequence for botulinum toxin type B were synthesised. For the second sequence 23 oligonucleotides representing internal sequence nucleotides 691-1641 of the native sequence for botulinum toxin type B were synthesised. The oligonucleotides ranged from 57-73 nucleotides in length. Overlapping regions, 17-20 nucleotides, were designed to give melting temperatures in the range 52-56° C. In addition, terminal restriction endonuclease sites of the synthetic products were constructed to facilitate insertion of these products into the exact corresponding region of the native sequence. The 268 bp 5′ synthetic sequence has been incorporated into the gene shown in SEQ ID NO: 21 in place of the original first 268 bases (and is shown in SEQ ID NO: 27). Similarly the sequence could be inserted into other genes of the examples.
Another variant sequence equivalent to nucleotides 691 to 1641 of SEQ ID NO: 21, and employing non-native codon usage whilst coding for a native polypeptide sequence, has been constructed using the internal synthetic sequence. This sequence (SEQ ID NO: 28) can be incorporated, alone or in combination with other variant sequences, in place of the equivalent coding sequence in any of the genes of the example.
An exemplification of the utility of this invention is as a non-toxic and effective immunogen. The non-toxic nature of the recombinant, single chain material was demonstrated by intraperitoneal administration in mice of GST-2LH423/A. The polypeptide was prepared and purified as described above. The amount of immunoreactive material in the final preparation was determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a monoclonal antibody (BA11) reactive against a conformation dependent epitope on the native LHN/A. The recombinant material was serially diluted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS; NaCl 8 g/l, KCl 0.2 g/l, Na2HPO4 1.15 g/l, KH2PO4 0.2 g/l, pH 7.4) and 0.5 ml volumes injected into 3 groups of 4 mice such that each group of mice received 10, 5 and 1 micrograms of material respectively. Mice were observed for 4 days and no deaths were seen.
For immunisation, 20 μg of GST-2LH423/A in a 1.0 ml volume of water-in-oil emulsion (1:1 vol:vol) using Freund's complete (primary injections only) or Freund's incomplete adjuvant was administered into guinea pigs via two sub-cutaneous dorsal injections. Three injections at 10 day intervals were given (day 1, day 10 and day 20) and antiserum collected on day 30. The antisera were shown by ELISA to be immunoreactive against native botulinum neurotoxin type A and to its derivative LHN/A. Antisera which were botulinum neurotoxin reactive at a dilution of 1:2000 were used for evaluation of neutralising efficacy in mice. For neutralisation assays 0.1 ml of antiserum was diluted into 2.5 ml of gelatine phosphate buffer (GPB; Na2HPO4 anhydrous 10 g/l, gelatin (Difco) 2 g/l, pH 6.5-6.6) containing a dilution range from 0.5 μg (5×10−6 g) to 5 picograms (5×10−12 g). Aliquots of 0.5 ml were injected into mice intraperitoneally and deaths recorded over a 4 day period. The results are shown in Table 3 and Table 4. It can clearly be seen that 0.5 ml of 1:40 diluted anti-GST-2LH423/A antiserum can protect mice against intraperitoneal challenge with botulinum neurotoxin in the range 5 pg-50 ng (1-10,000 mouse LD50; 1 mouse LD50=5 pg).
As an exemplification of the expression of a nucleic acid coding for a LHN of a clostridial neurotoxin of a serotype other than botulinum neurotoxin type A, the nucleic acid sequence (SEQ ID NO: 23) coding for the polypeptide LH107/B (SEQ ID NO: 24) was inserted into the commercially available plasmid pET28a (Novogen, Madison, Wis., USA). The nucleic acid was expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) (New England BioLabs, Beverley, Mass., USA) as a fusion protein with a N-terminal T7 fusion peptide, under IPTG induction at 1 mM for 90 minutes at 37° C. Cultures were harvested and recombinant protein extracted as described previously for LH423/A.
Recombinant protein was recovered and purified from bacterial paste lysates by immunoaffinity adsorption to an immobilised anti-T7 peptide monoclonal antibody using a T7 tag purification kit (New England bioLabs, Beverley, Mass., USA). Purified recombinant protein was analysed by gradient (4-20%) denaturing SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Novex, San Diego, Calif., USA) and western blotting using polyclonal anti-botulinum neurotoxin type antiserum or anti-T7 antiserum. Western blotting reagents were from Novex, immunostained proteins were visualised using the Enhanced Chemi-Luminescence system (ECL) from Amersham. The expression of an anti-T7 antibody and anti-botulinum neurotoxin type B antiserum reactive recombinant product is demonstrated in
The recombinant product was soluble and retained that part of the light chain responsible for endopeptidase activity.
The invention thus provides recombinant polypeptides useful inter alia as immunogens, enzyme standards and components for synthesis of molecules as described in WO-A-94/21300.
The LHNC DNA fragment from the native clostridial neurotoxin gene was subcloned as a SalI-PstI fragment into the expression vector pMal-c2x (New England Biolabs). The gene fragment and the protein product that would be produced after proteolytic processing from the MBP-fusion protein are defined in SEQ ID 129/130. Other commercially available expression systems such as pET vector (Novagen) pGEX vectors (Pharmacia) or pQE vectors (Qiagen) would also be suitable for expression of the gene fragments.
The expression clone was transferred into the host strain AD494 (Novagen) containing a pACYC plasmid carrying the tRNA genes for the codons ATA, AGA, and CTA (commercially available, for example, as Rosetta strains from Novagen). As these codons are rarely used in E. coli, but are frequent in the clostridial genes encoding neurotoxins, the inclusion of these tRNA genes significantly increases expression levels. Those familiar with the art would recognise that this effect is not limited to LHN/C but is broadly applicable to all native clostridial LHN fragments. Similar effects were observed in other host strains including HMS174 (Novagen) and TB1 (NEB), and a wide range of other hosts would be suitable for expression of these fragments.
Expression cultures of AD494 (pACYC tRNAs) pMalc2x LHN/C were grown in Terrific Broth containing 35 μg/ml chloramphenicol, 100 μg/ml ampicillin, 1 RM ZnCl2 and 0.5% (w/v) glucose with an overnight culture diluted 1:100 into fresh media and grown for approximately 3 hours at 37° C. to an OD600 of 0.6-1. The cultures were induced with 1 mM IPTG and grown at 30° C. for 3-4 hours. Other expression systems used similar conditions except that the antibiotic was changed to kanamycin. Cells were lysed by either sonication in column buffer (20 mM Hepes 125 mM NaCl 1 μM ZnCl2 pH 7.2) or suitable detergent treatment (e.g., Bugbuster reagent; Novagen) and cell debris pelleted by centrifugation. Supernatant proteins were loaded onto an amylose resin column equilibrated in column buffer and proteins eluted with a single step elution using column buffer with 10 mM maltose.
The MBP-LHN/C construct used in this example has a factor Xa site situated between the MBP and LHN domains and also has a factor Xa site between the L and HN domains to allow the formation of the di-chain LHN form. To remove the fusion tag and in this case to activate the LHN fragment, the eluted protein from the amylose column is treated with factor Xa at a concentration of 1 unit protease activity per 50 μg purified fusion protein (as outlined by the manufacturer e.g., NEB) for approximately 20 hours at 25° C. The protein is then diluted 1:5 with 20 mM Hepes pH 7.2 and loaded onto a Q-sepharose fast flow column, the column washed and proteins eluted using a linear gradient of 25-500 mM NaCl in the 20 mM Hepes buffer. The free LHN fragment is eluted at approximately 50 mM NaCl with uncleaved fusion protein and free MBP eluted at higher concentrations of NaCl.
Those familiar with the art will recognise that for alternative expression vectors such as pMal-c2g, where the site for removal of the MBP tag is genenase, two subsequent protease cleavage reactions would be required for removal of the fusion partner (genenase cleavage) and subsequent activation of the LHN (factor Xa digestion). These cleavage reactions could be carried out simultaneously or with an intermediate ion exchange purification to remove contaminating proteins. An example of this model of purification/activation is identified below. These considerations are equally valid for native or synthetic activation sites as detailed in the sequence information and for LHN fragments of all the serotypes.
The LHN fragment from the native BoNT/F gene was modified by PCR to incorporate BamHI and HindIII, or other suitable sites, at the 5′ and 3′ ends respectively. The gene fragment was cloned into pET 28 to maintain the reading frames with the N-terminal His6 purification tag. The expression clone was transferred to a host strain carrying the pACYC tRNA plasmid as outlined in example 5 and the DE3 lysogen carrying the T7 polymerase gene. Suitable host strains would include JM109, AD494, HMS174, TB1 TG1 or BL21 carrying the appropriate genetic elements. For example HMS174 (DE3) pACYC tRNA pET28a LHN/F was used for expression and purification.
Expression cultures of HMS174 (DE3) pACYC tRNA pET28a LHN/F were grown in Terrific Broth containing 35 μg/ml chloramphenicol, 35, ug/ml kanamycin, 1 RM ZnCl2 and 0.5% (w/v) glucose to an OD600 of 2.0 at 30° C. and cultures were induced with 500 μM IPTG and grown at 25° C. for 2 hours prior to harvest by centrifugation. The cells were lysed in 20 mM Hepes 500 mM NaCl pH 7.4 by sonication or detergent lysis and the soluble protein fraction loaded onto a metal chelate column (e.g., IMAC HiTrap column Amersham-Pharmacia) loaded with CuSO4. Protein was eluted using a linear gradient of imidazole with His6 LHN/F eluting at between 50 and 250 mM imidazole.
The His6 tag was removed by treatment with thrombin essentially as described in Example 5. The released LHN fragment was purified using ion exchange on a Q-sepharose column as described in Example 5.
A native LHNTeNT gene fragment was modified to replace the native linker region with an enterokinase cleavable linker as shown in SEQ ID 144/145 and to incorporate cloning sites at the 5′ (BamHI) and 3′ ends (HindIII). This fragment was subcloned into pMAL c2x and expressed in HMS174 (pACYC tRNA) as described in Example 5. Initial purification on an amylose resin column, cleavage with factor Xa to remove the fusion tag and the ion exchange purification was also as described in Example 5 except that the positions of the elution peaks were reversed with the free MBP peak eluting before the peak for free LHN.
The LHNC fragment was cloned into a GATEWAY® (cloning system) ENTRY VECTOR (cloning vector) as a SalI-PstI. Two version were made with a stop codon within the 3′ PstI site to terminate the protein at this position (LHNC STOP; SEQ ID 123/124), or with no stop codon to allow the expression of the fragment with C-terminal fusion partners (LHNC NS; SEQ ID 131/132). The ENTRY VECTOR (cloning vector) was recombined with the DESTINATION VECTOR (cloning vector) to allow expression of the fragment with an N-terminal MBP tag. Recombination was according to standard protocols (Invitrogen GATEWAY® (cloning system) expression manual).
Expression of the fusion protein from the strain AD494 (pACYC tRNA) pMTL-malE-GW LHNC STOP, and its purification and was as described in Example 5. The addition of the additional N-terminal sequence made no significant change to the overall expression and purification. The final product following factor Xa cleavage was a disulfide bonded di-chain fragment as described above.
For expression of the fragment with additional C-terminal domains the LHNC NS ENTRY VECTOR (cloning vector) was recombined with a DESTINATION VECTOR (cloning vector) carrying additional sequences following the attachment site and in the appropriate frame. The sequence of the DNA encoding the LHN/C fragment flanked by att sites that has the properties necessary to facilitate recombination to create a full fusion is described in SEQ ID 133. For example, the DESTINATION VECTOR (cloning vector) pMTL-malE-GW-att-IGF was produced by subcloning the coding sequence for human IGF as an XbaI-HindIII fragment into the appropriate sites. Recombination of the LHN/C NS fragment into this vector yielded pMTL-malE-GW-LHNC-att-IGF.
This clone was expressed and purified as described above. Additional purification methods utilising the binding properties of the C-terminal IGF domain could also be used if desired.
Those familiar with the art will recognise that a similar approach could be used for other LHN fragments from either BoNT/C or other serotypes. Similarly other C-terminal purification tags or ligands could be incorporated into DESTINATION VECTORS (cloning vectors) in the same way as for IGF above.
The LHNTeNT BamHI-HindIII fragment described in Example 7 was subcloned into an ENTRY VECTOR (cloning vector) to maintain the appropriate reading frames. The ENTRY VECTOR (cloning vector) was designed to incorporate a factor Xa site immediately adjacent to the BamHI site such that cleavage resulted in a protein starting with the GlySer residues encoded by the BamHI site. The ENTRY VECTOR (cloning vector) was recombined with a commercially available DESTINATION VECTOR (cloning vector) carrying an N-terminal 6-His tag (e.g., pDEST17; Invitrogen). The resulting clone pDEST17 LHNTeNT was expressed in the host strain HMS174 (pACYC tRNA). As described in Example 6. Purification of the fusion protein is also as described in Example 5 with the N-terminal His tag removed by factor Xa treatment, followed by subsequent removal of factor Xa on a Q-sepharose column.
LHN/C clones of the type described in SEQ ID 115/116, 117/118, 119/120 & 121/122 were expressed and purified as previously indicated in Example 5. Purified, activated LHN/C protein was then mixed with an equimolar amount of ligand tagged with the complementary clamp partner (jun-tagged ligand for SEQ ID 117/118 and 121/122; poly-arginine-tagged ligand for SEQ ID 115/116 and 119/120). Proteins were gently mixed to facilitate associated, then purified to isolate associated ligand-endopeptidase fragment.
LHNTeNT clones of the type described in SEQ ID 142/143, 144/145 & 146/147 were modified to incorporate one component of the acid/base leucine zipper clamping system. Following expression and purification of the tagged proteins as previously indicated in Example 5, the association with tagged ligand was performed essentially as described in Example 10.
As in SEQ ID 99/100 an LHN/B carrying a thrombin site in the linker between the L and HN domains was expressed from pMAL c2x essentially as described in Example 5. The purified LHN/B fragment was incubated with 1 unit thrombin per mg protein for 20 hours at 25° C. The di-chain LHN was separated form the thrombin by further purification on a Q-sepharose column as described in Example 5.
To prepare activated di-chain LHN the purified protein (e.g., obtained from SEQ ID 144/145) was treated with enterokinase at a concentration of 1 enzyme unit per 50 μg purified protein at 25° C. for 20 hours. The activated di-chain LHN was then purified from the enterokinase by ion exchange on a Q-sepharose column under identical conditions to that used for the purification following factor Xa cleavage (as described in Example 5) or using a benzamidine sepharose column equilibrated in 20 mM Hepes 100 mM NaCl pH 7.2 to specifically bind and remove the enterokinase.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/527,411, abandoned, which is a national stage application of PCT/GB2003/003824, filed on Sep. 12, 2003, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/241,596, filed on Sep. 12, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,192,596. All of these applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4594336 | Bizzini | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4880911 | Brewer et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 5668255 | Murphy | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5747254 | Pontius | May 1998 | A |
| 5919665 | Williams | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5939070 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5989545 | Foster et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6043042 | Shone et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6166956 | Yiu et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6372225 | Matsuda | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6383775 | Duff et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6395513 | Foster et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6437095 | Lilie et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6444209 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6461617 | Shone et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6632440 | Quinn et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6776990 | Sachs et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6787517 | Gil et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6822076 | Bigalke et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6831059 | Donovan | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6855688 | McKerracher | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6962703 | Foster et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 7052702 | Duggan et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7081529 | Smith et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7138127 | Donovan | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7192596 | Shone et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7193066 | Chaddock et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7208466 | Foster et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7364586 | Marx et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7368532 | Shone et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7413742 | Donovan | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7419674 | Chulay et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7425338 | Donovan | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7452543 | Chaddock et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7470661 | Shone et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7674470 | Shone et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7887810 | Foster et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7892560 | Foster et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7897158 | Shone et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 8012479 | Shone et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8012491 | Shone et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8017134 | Shone et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8124074 | Foster et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8158132 | Foster et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8404249 | Dake et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8454976 | Shone et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8647639 | First | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 20020037999 | Mayer | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020044950 | Shone et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020177545 | Donovan | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030049264 | Foster et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030147895 | Shone et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030166238 | Shone et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030180289 | Foster et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040013687 | Simpson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040071736 | Quinn et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040208889 | Sutton et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040219637 | Williams | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050013831 | Foster et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050095251 | Steward et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050244435 | Shone et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050255093 | Shone et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060051356 | Foster et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060110409 | Shone et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121056 | Chaddock et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060204524 | Ichtchenko et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060216283 | Foster et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070010447 | Quinn et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070071764 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070148694 | Shone et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070184048 | Foster et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070184070 | Shone et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070248626 | Shone et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080032928 | Quinn et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080032930 | Steward et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080032931 | Steward et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080038274 | Foster et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080064092 | Foster et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080070278 | North et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080107690 | Dake et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080152667 | Quinn et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080161543 | Steward et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080187960 | Foster et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080241881 | Steward et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080249019 | Foster et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080319167 | Foster et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090004174 | Foster et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090035822 | Foster et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090041805 | Walker | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090048431 | Steward et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090053248 | Simpson et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090131645 | Foster et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090148888 | Shone et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20140056870 | James et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2001-502890 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| 9109871 | Jul 1991 | WO |
| 9215327 | Sep 1992 | WO |
| 9304191 | Mar 1993 | WO |
| 9315766 | Aug 1993 | WO |
| 9421300 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| 9421684 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| 9612802 | May 1996 | WO |
| 9633273 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| 9807864 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| 9807864 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| 9807864 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| 9808540 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| 0009716 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| 0057897 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| 0018881 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| 0100839 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| 0100814 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| 0102440 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| 0114570 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| 0114570 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| 0114570 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| 0158936 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 0244199 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| 0244199 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| 2004024909 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| 2006026780 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| 2006059093 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| 2006059105 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| 2007138336 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| 2007138339 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| 2008008805 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Michael J. Duggan, et al. “Inhibition of release of neurotransmitters from rat dorsal root ganglia by a novel conjugate of a Clostridium botulinum toxin A endopeptidase fragment and Erythrina cristagalli lectin”, Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, No. 38, Sep. 20, 2002, pp. 34846-34852. |
| John A. Chaddock, et al. “Expression and purification of catalytically active, non-toxic endopeptidase derivatives of Clostridium botulinum toxin type A”, Protein Expression and Purification, vol. 25, No. 2, Jul. 2002, pp. 219-228. |
| M. Matsushita, et al. “A high-efficiency protein transduction system demonstrating the role of PKA in long-lasting long-term potentiation”, The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, Aug. 15, 2001, Lnkd-Pubmed: 11487623, vol. 21, No. 16, pp. 6000-6007. |
| S. Le Borgne, et al. “Experimental and theoretical analysis of the chromatographic behaviour of protein purification fusions carrying charged tails.” Bioseparation Feb. 1995, vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 53-64. |
| European Search Report dated Apr. 12, 2011, 22 pages. |
| Bizzini, B., “Investigation of the Mode of Action of Tetanus Toxin with the Aid of Hybrid Molecules Consisting in Part of Tetanus Toxin-Derived Fragments,” in Bacterial Protein Toxins, Academic Press London, pp. 427-434 (1984). |
| International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/GB97/02273, mailed Jan. 30, 1998. |
| Kurazono, H., et al., “Minimal Essential Domains Specifying Toxicity of the Light Chains of Tetanus Toxin and Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A,” J. Biol. Chem. 267:14721-14729, American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. (1992). |
| Li, Y., et al., “A Single Mutation in the Recombinant Light Chain of Tetanus Toxin Abolishes its Proteolytic Activity and Removes the Toxicity Seen after Reconstitution with Native Heavy Chain,” Biochem. 33:7014-70120, American Chemical Society (1994). |
| Niemann, H., “Molecular Biology of Clostridial Neurotoxins,” In Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins, Ch. 15, Alouf, J.E. and J.H. Freer, eds., Academic Press Limited, London, pp. 303-348 (1991). |
| Poulain, B., et al., “Inhibition of transmitter release by botulinum neurotoxin A: Contribution of various fragments to the intoxication process,” Eur. J. Biochem. 185:197-203, Springer International (1989). |
| Rudinger J., “Characteristics of the amino acids as components of a peptide hormone sequence”, in Peptide Hormones, Parsons, J.A., ed., University Park Press, Baltimore, pp. 107 (1976). |
| Zhou, L., et al., “expression and Purification of the Light Chain of Botulinum Neurotoxin A: A Single Mutation Abolishes Its Cleavage of SNAP-25 and Neurotoxicity after Reconstitution with the Heavy Chain,” Biochem. 34:15175-15181, American Chemical Society (Nov. 1995). |
| Hausinger, A., et al., “Inhibition by Clostridial Neurotoxins of Calcium-Independent [3H] Noradrenaline Outflow from Freeze-Thawed Synaptosomes: Comparison with Synaptobrevin Hydrolysis,” Toxicon 33:1519-1530, Elsevier Science Ltd. (Nov. 1995). |
| Greenspan, et al. (Nature Biotechnology 7: 936-937, 1999). |
| Bowie, et al. (Science, 1990, 247: 1306-1310). |
| Willems, et al. Res. Microbiol. (1993) vol. 144 pp. 547-556. |
| Houghten, et al.., “Relative Importance of Position and Individual Amino Acid Residues in Peptide Antigen-Antibody Interactions: Implications in the Mechanism of Antigenic Drift and Antigenic Shift”, Vaccines (1986) 86: 21-25. |
| Willems, et al 1993 Sequence of the gene coding for the neurotoxin of Clostridium botulinum type a associated with infant botulism: comparison with other clostridial neurotoxins vol. 144 pp. 547-556. |
| Binz, et al 1990 Eur. J. Biochem. 189: 73-8. |
| Atassi, M.Z., “Basic Immunological Aspects of Botulinum Toxin Therapy,” Movement Disorders 19: S68-S84, Movement Disorder Society (2004). |
| Blaustein, R.O., et al., “The N-terminal half of the heavy chain of botulinum type a neurotoxin forms channels in planar phospholipid bilayers,” F.E.B.S. Letters 226:115-120, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (1987). |
| Bowie J.U., et al., “Deciphering the Message in Protein Sequences: Tolerance to Amino Acid Substitutions,” Science 247:1306-1310, American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). |
| Bruggemann, H., et al., “The genome sequence of Clostridium tetani, the causative agent of tetanus disease,” PNAS 100:1316-1321, National Academy of Sciences (2003). |
| Brunger, A.T., et al., “Botulinum Neurotoxin Heavy Chain Belt as an Intramolecular Chaperone for the Light Chain,” PLoS Pathogens 3:1191-1194 (2007). |
| Byrne, M.P., et al., “Purification, Potency, and Efficacy of the Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Binding Domain from Pichia pastoris as a Recombinant Vaccine Candidate,” Infection and Immunity 66:4817-4822, American Society for Microbiology (1998). |
| Byrne, M.P., et al., “Development of vaccines for prevention of botulism,” Biochimie 82:955-966, Elsevier SAS (2000). |
| Creighton, T.E., Proteins, pp. 314-315, W.H. Freeman Company (1984). |
| Creighton, T.E., Protein Structure: A Practical Approach, pp. 184-186, IRL Press (1989). |
| Eisel, U., et al., “Tetanus toxin: primary structure, expression in E. coli , and homology with botulinum toxins,” the EMBO Journal 5:2495-2502, IRL Press Limited (1986). |
| Goonetilleke, A., et al., “Clostridial Neurotoxins,” J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:iii35-iii39, BMJ Journals (2004). |
| Hill, K.K., et al., “Genetic Diversity among Botulinum Neurotoxin-Producing Clostridial Strains,” Journal of Bacteriology 189:818-832, American Society of Microbiology (2007). |
| Kumar, V., et al., “Amino Acid Variations at a Single Residue in an Autoimmune Peptide Profoundly Affect its Properties: T-Cell Activation, Major Histocompatibility Complex Binding, and Ability to Block Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis,” PNAS 87:1337-1341, National Academy of Sciences (1990). |
| Nosoh, Y., Protein Stability and Stabilization Through Protein Engineering, pp. 197-217, Prentice Hall (1991). |
| Park, J-B., et al., “Progress toward development of an inhalation vaccine against botulinum toxin,” Expert Review of Vaccines 3:477-487, Expert Reviews Ltd. (2004). |
| Sebaihia, M., et al., “Genome sequence of a proteolytic (Group I) Clostridium botulinum strain Hall A and comparative analysis of the clostridial genomes,” Genome Research 17:1082-1092, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (2007). |
| Shone, C.C., et al., “A 50-kDa fragment from the NH2-terminus of the heavy subunit of Clostridium botulinum type A neurotoxin forms channels in lipid vesicles,” Eur. J. Biochem 167:175-180, F.E.B.S. (1987). |
| Willems, A., et al., “Sequence of the gene coding for the neurotoxin of Clostridium botulinum type A associated with infant botulism: comparison with other clostridial neurotoxins,” Res. Microbiol. 144:547-556, Elsevier (1993). |
| Duggan, J.M., et al., “Inhibition of Release of Neurotransmitters from Rat Dorsal Root Ganglia by a Novel Conjugate of a Clostridium botulinum Toxin A Endopeptidase Fragment and Erythrina cristagalli Lectin,” J. Biol. Chem. 277:34846-34852, The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. (Sep. 2002). |
| Hetling, T.B., and Nau, H.-H., “Analysis of the Immune Response to Papain Digestion Products of Tetanus Toxin,” Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. Sect. C, 92:59-63, Munksgaard International Publishers (1984). |
| East, A.K., et al., “Organization and Phylogenetic Interrelationships of Genes Encoding Components of the Botulinum Toxin Complex in Proteolytic Clostridium botulinum Types A, B, and F: Evidence of Chimeric Sequences in the Gene Encoding the Nontoxic Nonhemagglutinin Component,” Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46:1105-1112, Society for General Microbiology (Oct. 1996). |
| Dasgupta, B.R., et al., “Partial Sequence of the Light Chain of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A,” Biochem. 26:4162, Abstract #33, American Chemical Society (1987). |
| Gimenez, J.A. and DasGupta, B.R., “Botulinum Type a Neurotoxin Digested with Pepsin Yields 132, 97, 72, 45, 42, and 18 kD Fragments,” J. Prot. Chem. 12:351-363, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers (1993). |
| Betley, M.J., et al., “Characterization of Botulinum Type A Neurotoxin Gene: Delineation of the N-Terminal Encoding Region,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 162:1388-1395, Academic Press (1989). |
| Thompson, D.E., et al., “The complete amino acid sequence of the Clostridium botulinum type A neurotoxin, deduced by nucleotide sequence analysis of the encoding gene,” Eur. J. Biochem. 189:73-81, Blackwell Science Ltd. On behalf of the Federation of European Biochemical Societies (1990). |
| Bowie, J.U., et al., “Deciphering the Message in Protein Sequences: Tolerance to Amino Acid Substitutions,” Science 247:1306-1310, American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). |
| Houghten,, R.A., et al., “Relative Importance of Position and Individual Amino Acid Residues in Peptide Antigen-Antibody Interactions: Implications in the Mechanism of Antigenic Drift and Antigenic Shift,” in: Vaccines86, New Approaches to Immunization, Brown, F., et al., eds., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp. 21-25 (1986). |
| Binz, T., et al., “Proteolysis of SNAP-25 by Types E and A Botulinal Neurotoxins,” J. Biol. Chem. 269:1617-1620, American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. (1994). |
| Tonello, F., et al., “Recombinant and Truncated Tetanus Neurotoxin Light Chain: Cloning, Expression, Purification, and Proteolytic Activity,” Protein Expr. Purif. 15:221-227, Academic Press (Mar. 1999). |
| Chaddock, J.A., et al., “Expression and purification of catalytically active, non-toxic endopeptidase derivatives of Clostridium botulinum toxin type A,” Protein Expr. Purif. 25:219-228, Academic Press (Jul. 2002). |
| Fijita, R., et al., “Molecular characterization of two forms of nontoxic-nonhemagglutinin components of Clostridium botulinum type a progenitor toxins,” FEBS Lett. 376:41-44, Elsevier Science B.V. (Nov. 1995). |
| Lacy, D.B., et al., “Crystal structure of botulinum neurotoxin type A and implications for toxicity,” Nature 5:898-902, Nature Publishing Company (Oct. 1998). |
| Shone, C.C., et al., “Inactivation of Clostridium botulinum type A neurotoxin by trypsin and purification of two tryptic fragments. Proteolytic action near the COOH-terminus of the heavy subunit destroys toxin-binding activity,” Eur. J. Biochem. 151:75-82, Blackwell Science Ltd. On behalf of the Federation of European Biochemical Societies (1985). |
| Schiavo, G., et al., “Botulinum neurotoxins serotypes A and E cleave SNAP-25 at distinct COOH-terminal peptide bonds,” FEBS Lett. 335:99-103, Elsevier Science B.V. (1993). |
| Rigoni, M., et al., “Site-Directed Mutagenesis Identifies Active-Site Residues of the Light Chain of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 288:1231-1237, Academic Press (Nov. 2001). |
| Sathyamoorthy, V., et al., “Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A: Cleavage of the Heavy Chain into Two Halves and Their Partial Sequences,” Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 266:142-151, Academic Press (1988). |
| Schmidt, J.J., et al., “Partial Amino Acid Sequence of the Heavy and Light Chains of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 119:900-904, Academic Press (1984). |
| Dasgupta, B.R. and Dekleva, M.L., “Botulinum neurotoxin type A: sequence of amino acids at the N-terminus and around the nicking site,” Biochimie 72:661-664, Editions Scientifiques Elsevier (1990). |
| Turton, K., et al., “Botulinum and tetanus neurotoxins: structure, function and therapeutic utility,” Trends Biochem. Sci. 27:552-558, Elsevier Science Ltd. (Sep. 26, 2002). |
| Lalli, G., et al., “The journey of tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins in neurons,” Trends Microbiol. 11:431-437, Elsevier Science Ltd. (Sep. 2003). |
| Montecucco, C., et al., “Botulinum neurotoxins: mechanism of action and therapeutic applications,” Molec. Med. Today 2:418-424, Elsevier Science Ltd. (Oct. 1996). |
| Johnson, E.A. and Bradshaw, M., “Clostridium botulinum and its neurotoxins: a metabolic and cellular perspective,” Toxicon 39:1703-1722, Elsevier Science Ltd. (Nov. 2001). |
| Rossetto, O., et al., “Tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins: turning bad guys into good by research,” Toxicon 39:27-41, Elsevier Science Lotd. (Jan. 2001). |
| Binz, T., et al., “The Complete Sequence of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A and Comparison with Other Clostridial Neutoroxins,” J. Biol. Chem. 265:9153-9158, American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. (1990). |
| Reto Crameri “Display of biologically active proteins on the surface of filamentous phages: a cDNA cloning system for selection of functional gene products linked to the genetic information responsible for their production” Elsevier Science Publishers; Gene, 137 (1993) pp. 111-121. |
| Robert Busch “Stabilization of soluble, low-affinity HLA-DM/HLA-DRI complexes by leucine zippers” Journal of Immunological Methods; 263 (2002) pp. 111-121. |
| Stuart N. Behncken “Growth Hormone (GH)-independent Dimerization of GH Receptor by a Leucine Zipper Results in Constitutive Activation” The Journal of Biological Chemistry; vol. 275, No. 22, (Jun. 3, 2000) pp. 17000-17007. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110028691 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10527411 | US | |
| Child | 12900214 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10241596 | Sep 2002 | US |
| Child | 10527411 | US |
