This invention generally relates to energy storage technologies, and more particularly to redox flow battery energy storage systems and applications.
Many renewable energy technologies, while economically viable and environmentally beneficial, suffer from the disadvantage of periodic and unpredictable power generation. To enable such renewable energy technologies to expand, large scale energy storage systems are required. Additionally, many conventional electric generation technologies, such as coal and nuclear power plants, as well as promising alternative energy generation technologies, such as fuel cells, function best when operated at constant power, and thus can benefit from energy storage systems that can deliver peak power when needed and store energy during off-peak hours.
A redox flow battery storage system stores electrical energy in electrolyte species. The redox flow battery storage system includes at least one redox flow battery stack assembly including a number of layers with each layer including multiple independent cells in cascade orientation along the reactant flow path. The cells of the redox flow battery stack assembly are configured and optimized to increase electrical storage efficiency with the state-of-charge of reactants expected in each cell. Reactants may be heated to increase battery efficiency, with waste heat from energy sources or uses of energy from the battery or system providing the thermal energy to heat the reactants. By adjusting the size of tanks for storing the reactants and adding redox flow battery stack assemblies, the storage system can be sized to support multi-megawatt implementations suitable for use with power grid applications. Thermal integration with energy generating systems, such as fuel cell, wind and solar systems, further maximizes total energy efficiency. The redox flow battery system can also be scaled down to smaller applications, such as a gravity feed system suitable for small and remote site applications.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and constitute part of this specification, illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention, and, together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain features of the invention.
The various embodiments will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. References made to particular examples and implementations are for illustrative purposes, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention or the claims.
As used herein, the terms “about” or “approximately” for any numerical values or ranges indicates a suitable temperature or dimensional tolerance that allows the part or collection of components to function for its intended purpose as described herein.
The various embodiments provide an energy storage system based upon a reduction/oxidation (redox) flow battery stack assembly that is suitable for a wide variety of energy uses and renewable energy systems.
A system diagram of an embodiment of a redox flow battery energy storage system is illustrated in
Referring to
The redox flow battery stack assembly 10 is designed for reduce cost by keeping the complexity and part count of the stack to a minimum. The redox flow battery stack assembly 10 is further designed to minimize shunt current losses and maximizing reactant utilization.
The redox flow battery stack assembly 10 is configured to include an array of independent battery cells, assembly frames as shown in
Some types of flow battery electrolytes operate more efficiently (i.e., retaining and discharging electrical power with lower losses) when the fluids are heated to an optimum temperature. To take advantage of this characteristic, the redox flow battery cell layer assembly 48 may be configured with tubes 60, 62, 64, 66 or channels through which a heating fluid can be circulated. Circulating a heating fluid around and/or within the battery stack assembly can keep the electrolytes at a controlled temperature. By including heating fluid tubes 60, 62, 64, 66 before and after each battery cell, the operating temperature of each cell can be controlled individually so as to enable each cell to operate at a preferred or optimum temperature corresponding to the state of charge of electrolytes within the cell. The heating fluid tubes are optional because in an embodiment the electrolytes may be preheated within the tanks 26, 28, such as via a heat exchanger circulating a heating fluid so that the electrolytes enter the cell layers 48 at a sufficient temperature for charging or discharging operations. As described more fully below, the heating fluid may draw thermal energy waste heat generate by either the source of the charging power 45 (e.g., from a generator cooling system) or the load 46 (e.g., from an equipment cooling system).
A conceptual build of a single cell of a cell section within the cell layer 48 of a flow battery stack is illustrated in
The anolyte and catholyte reactants are separated by a planar membrane separator 12 which is suspended between the two planar structural members 80, 82 by frame members 84, 86, 88, 90. It should be noted that the frame members 84, 86, 88, 90 may be in the form of two exterior frames as illustrated in
At the reactant inlet of each battery cell 50, manifold holes 92, 94 may be provided to direct the incoming electrolyte flows into the reaction area of the cell 50. In an embodiment, the manifolds may include flow directing structures to cause proper mixing of the electrolytes as they enter each reaction cell 50. Such flow directing structures may be configured to optimize the reactant flow in each cell 50 within the redox flow battery stack assembly 10 based upon the expected state of charge and other fluid properties within each cell.
The planar structural members 80, 82, as well as separator frame members 84, 86, 88, 90 may include passages through which heat exchanger fluid pipes 60, 62 can pass. Positioning optional heat exchanger fluid pipes 60 within the cell input manifolds 92, 94 enables heat from the thermal fluid within the pipes to raise the temperature of the reactant flows before the reactants enter the cell chamber. Similarly, positioning heat exchanger pipes 62 within the cell output manifolds 96, 98 enables the thermal fluid to extract heat from the electrolytes after the reactants leave a final cell 56, thereby conserving thermal energy and enabling the electrolytes to be returned to storage tanks at a cooler temperature. In a preferred embodiment the thermal fluid is heated to a temperature of about 40 to 65° C. for Fe/Cr reactants.
A redox flow battery stack assembly 10 may be formed by stacking layers 48 in series to form a battery stack. In this battery stack assembly the conductive surfaces 22, 24 provide the electrical connectivity between cells in each stack cell layer as described below with reference to
The planar structural members 80, 82 which form the bipolar frame may be electrically conductive throughout their area, or may be made in such a way that only the conductive surfaces 22, 24 immediately adjacent to the electrochemically active portion of the cell 50 are electrically conductive, as illustrated in
To form each cell layer 48 as illustrated in
In the redox flow battery system of the various embodiments the cells can be replaceable and recyclable. Since the materials of construction are primarily plastics (e.g., polypropylene or polyethylene), carbon fiber felts, and carbon fiber electrodes, the cells contain no heavy metals or toxins that could pose an environmental impact. Further, the reactants, such as Fe/Cr, are no more toxic or dangerous than battery acid. Thus, the redox flow battery system of the various embodiments are ideal for providing the energy storage capacity required for renewable energy systems in a distributed fashion close to the population and load centers.
As explained more fully below with reference to
A variety of reactants and catalysts may be used in the redox flow battery system. A preferred embodiment set of electrolyte reactants is based upon the iron and chromium reactions illustrated in
An undesirable non-faradic electron transfer reaction can occur between Fe3+ and Cr2+ if these ions come into proximity to one another. Therefore, to maintain a high level of coulombic efficiency, electrolyte cross-mixing within a Fe/Cr redox flow battery stack should be minimized. One way to minimize electrolyte cross-mixing is to use a highly selective membrane separator 12 such as Nafion®-117 ion-exchange membrane (DuPont, USA). A disadvantage of highly-selective membrane separators is that they have low ionic conductivity which results in lower voltage efficiency within the redox flow battery stack. Additionally, ion-exchange membranes are expensive, with a price in the neighborhood of $500/m2. Since the DC energy storage efficiency of a redox flow battery is the product of coulombic and voltage efficiencies, an optimization tradeoff exists.
A particular embodiment of the Fe/Cr system is what is known as the mixed reactant system where FeCl2 (Fe2+) is added to the anolyte and CrCl3 (Cr3+) is added to the catholyte, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,543,302, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. An advantage of the mixed reactant system is that the discharged anolyte and discharged catholyte are identical. Furthermore, when the total concentration of Fe in the anolyte is the same as the catholyte, and the total concentration of Cr in the catholyte is the same as the anolyte, the concentration gradients across the membrane separators 12 are eliminated. In this way the driving force for cross-mixing between anolyte and catholyte is reduced. When the driving force for cross-mixing is reduced less selective membrane separators may be used, thereby providing lower ionic resistance and lower system costs. Examples of less-selective membrane separators include microporous membrane separators manufactured by Celgard LLC, and membrane separators made by Daramic LLC, both of which cost in the neighborhood of $5 to 10/m2. By optimizing the cell characteristics for the reactant state of charge and completing the charge or discharge in one pass, the embodiments described herein provide suitably high efficiency in a redox flow battery stack comprised of materials that are approximately two orders of magnitude lower cost than in conventional redox flow battery designs.
In both the unmixed and mixed reactant embodiments, the reactants are dissolved in HCl, which is typically about 1-3 M concentration. The electrocatalyst, which may be a combination of Pb, Bi and Au or ZrC, is provided at the negative electrode to improve the rate of reaction of recharging when Cr3+ in the anolyte is reduced to Cr2+, thereby reducing or eliminating hydrogen evolution. Hydrogen evolution is undesirable as it unbalances the anolyte from the catholyte and is a competing reaction to Cr3+ reduction leading to a reduction in coulombic efficiency.
The cell, cell layer and redox flow battery stack designs described herein can be used with other reactant combinations that include reactants dissolved in an electrolyte. One example is a stack containing the vanadium reactants V(II)/V(III) or V2+/V3+ at the negative electrode (anolyte) and V(IV)/V(V) or V4+/V5+ at the positive electrode (catholyte). The anolyte and catholyte reactants in such a system are dissolved in sulfuric acid. This type of battery is often called the all-vanadium battery because both the anolyte and catholyte contain vanadium species. Other combinations of reactants in a flow battery that can utilize the embodiment cell and stack designs include Sn (anolyte)/Fe (catholyte), Mn (anolyte)/Fe (catholyte), V (anolyte)/Ce (catholyte), V (anolyte)/Br2 (catholyte), Fe (anolyte)/Br2 (catholyte), and S (anolyte)/Br2 (catholyte). In each of these example chemistries, the reactants are present as dissolved ionic species in the electrolytes, which permits the use of battery cell and stack designs in which electrolyte flow through a plurality of battery cells series along the flow path (i.e., cascade flow), with the cells and having different physical properties along the flow path (cell size, type of membrane or separator, type and amount of catalyst). A further example of a workable redox flow battery chemistry and system is provided in U.S. Pat. No. 6,475,661, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
A number of cell chambers are formed in each bipolar frame in a redox flow battery stack array.
Due to the variation in reactant ion concentrations as the reactants flow through the various cells in each layer, the amounts of catalytic coating may be varied to match the state of charge condition in each of the respective cells. Additionally, the catalytic coating formations applied to the porous electrodes 18, 20 may be varied in formulation (e.g., varying amounts of zirconia or bismuth compounds) to better match the state of charge condition in each cell. For example, typically the cell with the lower reactant concentrations will require a higher catalyst loading on the porous electrodes to achieve optimum performance.
The various embodiments include a unique redox flow battery stack configuration that includes multiple independent cells within a flow path as illustrated in
For example, as described above, the discharge catalyst loading and discharge catalyst activity (both Group B design parameters) may be increased in each cell along the flow path of redox flow battery stack assembly 10 from inlet to outlet in the discharge mode and decreased in each cell along the flow path of redox flow battery stack assembly 10 from inlet to outlet in the charge mode to compensate for decreasing reactant concentrations, as indicated by the design trend line 116. Similarly, the charge catalyst loading and charge catalyst activity (both Group A design parameters) may be decreased in each cell along the flow path of redox flow battery stack assembly 10 from inlet to outlet in the discharge mode and increased in each cell along the flow path of redox flow battery stack assembly 10 from inlet to outlet in the charge mode to compensate for decreasing reactant concentrations, as indicated by the design trend line 112. The specific catalyst loading and catalysts activity implemented within each cell along the flow path can be determined using the design trend line 116 with respect to discharging, trend line 112 with respect to charging, and the number of cells in the path.
Using the design trend lines 112, 116 illustrated in
Similarly, the various embodiments may control the temperature of reactants as they flow through the redox flow battery stack depending upon whether the stack is charging or discharging.
In a similar manner, the various embodiments improve electrochemical performance by configuring the redox flow battery stack assembly 10 so that the reactant mass transport rate varies from cell to cell along the flow path.
In a similar manner, embodiment redox flow battery cells may be configured with different membrane separator 12 materials along the reactant flow path.
Thus, in an embodiment redox flow battery stack assembly 10 may include cells at one end of the flow path having membrane separators 12 made from a material with high membrane selectivity at the cost of greater ohmic losses, while cells at the other end of the flow path will have membrane separators 12 made from a material with lower ohmic losses. This design approach works because the driving force for cross mixing is greatly diminished due to the low concentrations of spontaneously-reacting active species at the outlet end in the discharge mode and at the inlet end in the charge mode. In the case of an Fe/Cr redox flow battery (
As mentioned above, the particular design configuration of each cell within a particular redox flow battery stack assembly 10 may be determined by applying the design trend lines illustrated in
By varying the design configurations of independent cells along the reactant flow path through the redox flow battery cell layer 48 and stack assembly 10 the various embodiments are able to achieve significant charging/discharging performance improvements over conventional redox flow battery designs. This performance improvement is illustrated in
By forming the conducting regions (e.g., conductive surfaces 22, 24) only on the active areas of the bipolar frame as illustrated in
Instead of assembling cells within a unibody frame for each cell layer, each cell may be assembled within cell frames 52a-56c in an embodiment illustrated in
As mentioned above, one source of losses in a redox flow battery is due to mixing or leakage of reactants along the edges of the membrane separator 12. As illustrated in
As mentioned above, the performance of a redox flow battery stack assembly 10 can be enhanced by heating the reactants to optimum temperatures at various stages within the battery flow path. Various embodiments accomplish such heating by using waste heat or alternative energy heat sources, thereby enhancing electrical performance while reducing parasitic losses. The various embodiments have a number of useful applications in energy generation applications as well as industrial applications which use electrical power and generate waste heat (e.g., heat sinks from air-conditioning and equipment cooling systems). As discussed in the embodiments below, alternative energy sources such as wind turbines and solar panels require cooling to enhance performance and prevent mechanical breakdown. Larger energy storage systems using the Fe/Cr redox flow battery technology can be thermally integrated with wind turbine farms and photovoltaic solar farms as illustrated in
Integrating a wind turbine system with a redox flow battery system provides a renewable power generation system which can operate more efficiently and economically than a wind turbine farm that does not have energy storage capacity. Such a system can store power whenever the wind is blowing, and meet the power demands of the electrical power grid regardless of the current wind conditions. This enables a wind turbine/redox flow battery system to meet utility contractual obligations to provide consistent power to the electrical power grid, thereby avoiding economic penalties for failing to supply contracted power levels during times of little or no wind. Additionally, the system allows electrical power to be supplied to the power grid during periods of peak demand, enabling the system owner to sell electrical power at the most favorable rates regardless of when peak winds occur.
An embodiment energy generation and storage system combining a wind turbine farm 170 with a redox flow battery is illustrated in
Similar to the wind turbine/redox flow battery system described above with reference to
A solar energy conversion system, such as a photovoltaic (PV) array, concentrating photovoltaic (CPV) array, a solar thermal energy power plant, or a solar hot water system, can be thermally and electrically integrated with the redox flow battery system to provide a more economical and efficient renewable energy generation system 180, 190 as illustrated in
Thermally integrating a solar thermal energy collection system with a redox flow battery system can be accomplished in at least two configurations. In a first configuration illustrated in
In a third configuration illustrated in
Thermally integrating a solar collector or solar energy conversion system with a redox flow battery system can use either pump circulation as illustrated in
The thermosiphon solar heating system operates in closed loop configuration for both embodiments illustrated in
The table in
Thermal integration of a redox flow battery system with conventional power generation systems, such as nuclear and coal-fired power plants, can provide significant energy and economic efficiencies since such systems generate a large amount of low grade waste heat. As described above, thermally integrating the redox flow battery system with sources of waste heat improves the battery operating efficiency without the expense or parasitic losses of electrical or fossil fuel heaters. Electrically integrating a redox flow battery energy storage system with conventional power generation systems also provides significant economic advantages since the battery system can enable base-loaded power plants to accommodate grid support (ancillary services) or peak power demands without varying their output. As is well known, nuclear and coal-fired power plants operate most efficiently and economically when run at constant power levels. Peak power demands can be met by charging the redox flow battery energy storage system during periods of reduced demand (e.g., off-peak hours in the late evening) and then augmenting the electrical output of the power plant with electricity drawn from the battery system during periods of peak power demand. Such a combined power plant/energy storage system can be economically advantageous since electrical power can be generated in the most economical manner (i.e., at constant output 24 hours per day) but sold at times of peak demand when electricity prices are greatest. Further economic benefits can be obtained by adding a redox flow battery energy storage system to an established conventional power plant to meet growing demands for peak power without building additional power plants. The sizing flexibility of redox flow battery systems, in which energy storage capacity can be increased simply by increasing the size or number of reactant storage tanks, means the economic advantages of adding a flow battery storage system to a conventional power plant can be obtained without having to invest in a system sized for future demands.
Geothermal energy can also be used to heat the reactant storage tanks. This approach could provide a stable system with a large amount of thermal inertia. Low grade geothermal energy can be used to provide heat to the redox flow battery stack assembly 10 or to the reactant storage tanks. In this embodiment heat is obtained from geothermal energy deep within the Earth which can be conveyed by a thermal fluid around the reactant storage tanks and/or through a heat exchanger before and after the battery stack.
The redox flow battery storage system does not necessarily need to be placed in close proximity to the power generation system. For example, if there is a low cost source of waste heat from an industrial process or a solar array (PV or CPV) used to a building, it may be economically and efficiently advantageous to locate a redox flow battery within or near the building in which the process is accomplished or the solar array located. In this manner, the waste heat from the industrial process or on-site power or thermal energy generation can be used to enhance the battery efficiency, while the energy storage capacity of the battery is used to meet peak power demands or enable purchasing electrical power during off-peak hours when electricity rates are lower. Thus, if the industrial process uses large amounts of electricity, thermally and electrically integrating the process with a redox flow battery system can meet the process's demand for electrical power while electricity is purchased to charge the battery system during off-peak hours when electricity rates are lower. This type of implementation may reduce cooling costs for the industrial process over periods when the electricity rates are high, thus providing further cost savings.
All the previously mentioned low grade heat sources can also be applied to heating the reactant tanks instead of or in addition to heating the redox flow battery stack assembly 10. Heating the reactant tanks enables the system to respond very quickly to load changes without any thermal management problems because the reactant fluid is constantly maintained at the operating temperature ready to be utilized in the flow battery. Costs and complexities of heating and insulating the reactant storage tanks may be offset by the cost advantages of simplifying the redox flow battery stack design because this approach eliminates the need for heat exchanger elements within the battery stack assembly. Further, combining these alternative embodiments, such as heating storage tanks and providing heat exchangers within the stack may provide the optimum design approach for providing clean, low cost and reliable heat to the redox flow battery.
Four additional example system embodiments of the redox flow battery system for use in battery energy storage systems (BESS) are illustrated in
In a first example embodiment illustrated in
Electrical power is generated from the chemical energy stored in the electrolytes in a second (discharging) redox flow battery stack 212. Electrolyte from the storage tanks 214, 216 is directed to the second redox flow battery stack 212 via inlet flows 218, 220. Within the second redox flow battery stack 212, electricity is generated by converting Fe+3 ions to the Fe+2 state and Cr+2 ions to the Cr+3 state (see
Reactants flowing out of the second redox flow battery stack 212 (outflows 222, 224) may be pumped into the first redox flow battery stack 210 for recharging, thereby providing a single charging and discharging loop. Since the electricity provided to the DC load 206 is generated from electrolytes in the second redox flow battery stack 212, the output current is completely isolated from the electrical sources of charging power, enabling the output power to reliably follow the DC load without power spikes or power drops. This arrangement ensures power variations from the grid, on-site renewable energy generators, or on-site distributed generators do not disrupt power to the DC load 206. Conversely, the power fluctuations associated with a large and widely varying load, such as an electric vehicle charging station or industrial batch process (e.g., a mixer), remain isolated from the utility grid 202 and other energy sources. This is beneficial to utilities as it reduces stress on the grid and also is beneficial to charge station owners as it circumvents large power demand charges. The unique characteristics of the redox flow battery system also enables DC→DC conversion to be accomplished with high overall system efficiency by a suitable choice of the number of cells connected in series within each stack to achieve V1 in the charge stack and V2 in the discharge stack. Also, the facility owner can choose when to charge the system so as to select the lowest cost electricity in order to maximize gross profit margins.
As described above, electrical efficiencies of the first and second redox flow battery stacks 210, 212 can be enhanced by heating the reactants to an elevated temperature, such as about 40 to 65° C., using on-site waste heat from equipment or facility cooling systems or geothermal heating systems 236. As described above, a heating fluid from waste heat recovery systems, solar hot water system, or geothermal heating systems 236 may be provided to a heat exchanger within the redox flow battery stacks 210, 212 (as illustrated in flow 238) and/or to heat the reactant storage tanks 214, 216 (as illustrated in flow 240).
The embodiment illustrated in
A particularly attractive application for the Fe/Cr redox flow battery system 200 embodiment illustrated in
As described above with reference to
In a second example embodiment illustrated in
The vehicle charging station 250 embodiment illustrated in
Similar to the embodiment described above with reference to
Similar to the embodiments described above with reference to
In a fourth example embodiment illustrated in
In this embodiment, the chemical fuel, such as hydrogen or natural gas, may be provided from a fuel source 356 via a fuel pipe 354 to the fuel cell 352. For example, the fuel cell/redox flow battery system 350 may be located at or near a source of natural gas, such as in an oil field, so that natural gas extracted from the ground can be provided to the fuel cell. The fuel cell 352 converts the fuel into electricity and effluents (e.g., water and carbon dioxide). Electricity output from the fuel cell 352 is provided to the first redox flow battery stack 210 where the power is used to charge the electrolytes stored in the electrolyte storage tanks 214, 216. As described above, electrical energy stored in the electrolyte species is converted into electricity in the second redox flow battery stack 212. Electricity output 234 from the second redox flow battery stack 212 can be provided to an inverter 358 which converts the DC current generated by the battery into AC current compatible with the utility grid 202 or industrial facility 359. The inverter 358 may be a solid-state electrical DC→AC inverter or a motor-generator as are well-known in the art. In this embodiment, flow of the electrolyte through the second redox battery stack 212 can be controlled by adjusting the speed of the pumps 226, 228 so as to generate electricity to meet the demands of the grid 202. When demand from the utility grid 202 or industrial facility 359 exceeds the steady-state output of the fuel cell 252, stored energy in the electrolyte is used to meet the additional demand. When demand from the utility grid 202 is less than the steady-state output of the fuel cell 252, the excess energy is stored in the electrolyte. Thus, the system 350 can follow the peak demands of the utility grid 202 or industrial facility 359 without having to operate the fuel cell 352 in an inefficient or potentially damaging manner. In a similar but alternative manner, the system 350 can be used as an on-site distributed generator to follow the peak demands of a co-located industrial facility load 359. The base load demand of an industrial facility 359 can be satisfied by the utility grid 202 or an independent stand alone fuel cell system 352.
Similar to the embodiments described above with reference to
In a further embodiment illustrated in
Since the goal of the embodiment illustrated in
Additionally, since the goal of the embodiment illustrated in
Operation of the gravity-driven redox flow battery system 400 is illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The advantage of eliminating pumps from the flow battery system in the embodiment illustrated in
The control valves 418, 420, 422, 424 are the only moving mechanical components apart from the rotation mechanism. The system can be operated flexibly by switching between charge and discharge mode at any time. For example, once the system has discharged through one cycle it may be advantageous to discharge a second time by rotating the system through 180° to flow reactants back into the proper tanks for discharging without applying power to the battery stack 410, and then rotating the system another 180° to restart the discharge process. Doing so will generate more electrical power stored in the reactants, although the power output will be lower than the first discharge cycle. Likewise the system can be charged through a number of cycles in a similar process. Also the system can switch from charge to discharge mode without the need to rotate the tanks if needed, although the efficiency of the system will be reduced.
The simplicity of design and operation of the embodiment described above with reference to FIGS. 14 and 15A-15C, as well as the safety of the Fe/Cr electrolyte reactants, makes the embodiment system ideal for small power storage applications. For example, this embodiment may be ideally suited for use in remote power applications, such as remote towns and villages beyond the reach of a utility grid that use solar photovoltaic arrays and/or wind turbine generators for electricity. Adding a redox flow battery system similar to this embodiment would allow remote towns and villages to be supplied with electrical power at night, for example. Similarly, one or two systems according to this embodiment may be used in remote electric vehicle charging stations using utility grid power or local renewable energy sources to charge the system when no cars need to be charged, and rotating the storage system to provide electrical power for recharging an electric vehicle when required.
It is also possible to size this embodiment system to fit inside standard sized shipping containers. Because these systems are fully sealed and self contained they can be safely operated inside the shipping container, enabling the systems to be packaged for rapid deployment. For transportation purposes the electrolyte may be transported as a salt, e.g., a ferric chloride, which may be stored in the tanks. This can significantly reduce the weight of the system for transportation. Then once the system is in place, water can be added to reach the required concentrations for operation. In this manner, systems such as the embodiment described above with reference to
FIGS. 14 and 15A-15C show the battery stack 410 fully integrated with the tanks 404, 406, 414, 416, and fixed plumbing within the support structure 402. However, in another embodiment the tanks 404, 406, 414, 416 may be separated from the battery stack 410 so that the tanks may be rotated to achieve the desired gravity feed through the battery stack 410 which remains stationary. This alternative embodiment may be more flexible in terms of the ability to easily add more tank/storage capacity. This alternative embodiment will require flexible piping or include fluid couples that accommodate rotation without leaking.
As mentioned above, the various embodiments utilize independent cells with different configurations along the reactant flow path to increase overall electrical performance.
Further representative stack design parameters and performance characteristics for a three-cell configuration are listed in Table 1 below. All values are approximate.
The various system embodiments may employ a variety of electrolyte storage tank configurations as described below. In a simple embodiment, a single tank may be used to store each electrolyte as illustrated in
In a second approach, charged and discharged electrolytes can be stored separately in system embodiments illustrated in
In a further embodiment illustrated in
The tank separator 502, 506 inhibits mixing of the charged electrolyte 504, 514 that is fed to the redox flow battery stack assembly 10 with the discharged electrolyte 506, 516 which flows back into the electrolyte tanks 26, 28. This prevents dilution of the charged electrolytes and keeps the charged electrolyte concentrations at a constant level through out the discharging cycle, thereby maintaining the battery cell potentials constant. If mixing were to occur the electrolyte concentrations in the electrolyte tanks 26, 28 would be reduced over time as more and more discharged electrolyte 506, 516 is returned to the tanks.
While
The tank separator embodiments include two forms of movable tank separator designs; a tank separator with flow passages which can be opened to enable electrolyte to flow through the separator, and a tank separator with no flow passages. Operation of these two embodiment configurations are illustrated below with reference to
In a first embodiment illustrated in
During a charge or discharge cycle, initial (either charged or discharged) electrolyte 504 is drawn from the tank 26 from below the tank separator 502 and passed through the redox flow battery stack assembly 10 while electrolyte exiting the battery 506 is pumped into the tank 26 on top of the tank separator 502. This is illustrated in
Since the tank separator 502 is buoyant, opening the louvers 503 (or other valve structures) enables the tank separator 502 to begin floating towards the top of the tank. This is illustrated in
When the tank separator 502 reaches the top of the electrolyte 506 as illustrated in
Closing or opening the valve structures of the tank separator 502 can be controlled via an external drive which may be coupled magnetically to the valve mechanism, such as louvers 503. In this manner no wires or other connections are required between an outside controller or power supply and the separator. In a redox flow battery system the electrolyte flows through a completely closed system to avoid contact with air. This makes it difficult to perform maintenance on the valve mechanisms inside the electrolyte tank 26 for long periods. Therefore, an external control mechanism using magnetism as a coupling mechanism, for example, may have advantages for controlling the tank separator 502 inside the electrolyte tank 26.
Alternatively, the valve mechanisms or louvers 503 may be controlled by mechanical mechanisms activated by the position of the tank separator 502 within the tank 26. For example, the valve mechanisms, such as louver 503 may be configured to shut when the structure surfaces, such as a buoyant lever that latches the louvers closed when it rises above the fluid surface, and may be configured to open upon a portion of the structure contacting the bottom of the tank, such as a latch release mechanism.
In an alternative embodiment the tank separator 602 may be vertically oriented and configured to traverse the length of a horizontally disposed electrolyte tank 600 as illustrated in
To begin discharging the battery, the direction of the electrolytes flowing through the redox flow battery stack assembly 10 are reversed as shown in
At any time the flow through the redox flow battery stack assembly 10 can be reversed in order to switch from charging to discharging, or discharging to charging. Thus, as illustrated in
In the embodiment illustrated in
The seal between the tank separator 502, 602 and the electrolyte tank 26, 600 does not need to exceptionally leak proof because a small amount of leakage around the edges will have very little impact on the overall system efficiency if the tank volume is sufficiently large. Also some leakage, while undesirable, does not pose any threat to the flow battery system other than slightly reducing its overall efficiency.
Since the tank separator moves due to electrolyte being extracted from the tank when it is in one state-of-charge and reinjected when it is in the opposite state-of-charge, the position of the tank separator can function as a state-of-charge indicator. By incorporating a passive or active signaling device, such as a RFID chip or a large piece of metal, the position of the tank separator and hence the system state-of-charge, can be determined by a position sensitive reader of the signal from the RFID chip or induced magnetic field of the metal piece. Multiple RFID chips or metal pieces can be used to increase signal strength and/or provide redundancy.
The horizontal or vertical tank embodiments described in
As mention above, the electrolytes stored within the tanks 214, 218 in
Other design approaches may be used to keep charged and discharged electrolytes separate. In a first alternative approach, a bladder can be provided inside each tank for each electrolyte. The bladder could be sealed to the tank and be sized appropriately to accommodate the full volume of charged and discharged electrolytes. Discharged electrolyte may be pumped into the bladder portion of the tank, with the bladder preventing the discharged electrolyte from mixing with the charged electrolyte in the remainder of the tank. The use of an in-tank bladder is similar to the movable partition embodiment described above with reference to
In a second alternative approach, a series of tanks is used for each electrolyte that in aggregate have a larger volume than the volume of electrolyte. The tanks for an electrolyte are coupled to the redox flow battery stack assembly such that the discharged and charged electrolytes are distributed among the tanks during each half cycle of the battery system. This “N+1” configuration obviates the need for a movable partition or sealed part with the tradeoff of additional plumbing, valves, and control complexity.
Other alternative designs may leverage the fact that in the discharged state the two electrolytes in the Fe/Cr mixed reactant system have identical chemical compositions. Thus, for a system that is designed to operate over a state-of-charge range that goes to full discharge (i.e. zero state-of-charge), a three tank system may be used where a first tank holds charged anolyte, a second tank holds charged catholyte, and a third, larger tank, holds the combined discharged electrolytes. In a further alternative design, one tank may be sized to hold at minimum the volumes of both the anolyte and catholyte. In a further approach, the one tank may include two partitions inside which move from the middle of the tank to the two ends. In this alternative, charged anolyte is pumped into/out of one end of the tank while charged catholyte is pumped into/out of the other end of the tank, and discharged anolyte and catholytes are pumped into/out of the middle of tank. As discharged electrolyte fills the inner section, its expanding volume pushes the partitions towards each end, compensating for the decreasing volume of the charge electrolytes. In a further alternative, bladders may be used instead of partitions to create the three separate volumes within a single tank.
All tanks in the redox flow battery system embodiments described above (except for those illustrated in
Containerizing the electrolyte tanks described above may enable them to be more easily deployed than tanks that are constructed onsite or require custom foundations that must be built onsite. Also packaging the stacks, redox flow battery control system, and the power conditioning system inside standard shipping containers can create an entire system configuration that is easily shipped by rail and/or tractor trailer and deployed with relatively minimal onsite work. Thus, containerized redox flow battery systems can provide turn-key power energy storage systems that need only be connected to a utility grid or other source of electric power. A system design in which the containers housing the redox flow battery stacks, control system, and power conditioning system are placed above containers housing the electrolyte storage tanks yields an energy storage system that can be readily transported and set-up at the destination, and that facilitates control over electrolyte flows and full or partial draining of the stacks when the battery system is idle for short or extended periods of time.
In a further embodiment, the redox flow battery stack assembly may be configured so that the battery can perform charging and discharging operations with reactants flowing in a single direction. In one configuration, electrolyte tanks 26, 28 that allow mixing of charge and discharge electrolytes, such as shown in
The foregoing description of the various embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein, and instead the claims should be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
This application is a Divisional Application of co-pending U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/498,103, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,820,321 filed Jul. 6, 2009, which claims the benefit of priority to both U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/078,691 filed Jul. 7, 2008, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/093,017 filed Aug. 29, 2008. The entire contents of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/498,103, and U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/078,691 and 61/093,017, are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2946836 | Justi et al. | Jul 1960 | A |
3230975 | Mercier | Jan 1966 | A |
3540934 | Boeke | Nov 1970 | A |
3795544 | Clausi et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3934624 | Eberle | Jan 1976 | A |
3996064 | Thaller | Dec 1976 | A |
3999581 | Eberle | Dec 1976 | A |
4010780 | Eberle | Mar 1977 | A |
4018971 | Sheibley et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4062807 | Suzuki | Dec 1977 | A |
4071660 | Hart | Jan 1978 | A |
4117204 | Zito, Jr. | Sep 1978 | A |
4133941 | Sheibley | Jan 1979 | A |
4147843 | Hakkinen | Apr 1979 | A |
4159366 | Thaller | Jun 1979 | A |
4162351 | Putt et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4192910 | Giner et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4200684 | Bro | Apr 1980 | A |
4264686 | Frank | Apr 1981 | A |
4270984 | Giner et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4307159 | Hammond et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4309372 | Sheibley | Jan 1982 | A |
4362791 | Kaneko et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4370392 | Savinell et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4377623 | Parker et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4382116 | Gahn et al. | May 1983 | A |
4399200 | Galloway | Aug 1983 | A |
4407902 | Kummer et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4414090 | D'Agostino et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4454649 | Jalan et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4468441 | D'Agostino et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4469760 | Giner et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4485154 | Remick et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4492741 | Struthers | Jan 1985 | A |
4496637 | Shimada et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4543302 | Gahn et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4576878 | Gahn | Mar 1986 | A |
4578323 | Hertl et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4615108 | Tomazic | Oct 1986 | A |
4650732 | Weber | Mar 1987 | A |
4652501 | Bennetto et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4711828 | Ishida et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4714663 | Arnold, Jr. et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4784924 | Savinell et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4786567 | Skyllas-Kazacos et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4797566 | Nozaki et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4814241 | Nagashima et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4874483 | Wakabayashi et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4882241 | Heinzel | Nov 1989 | A |
4945019 | Bowen et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4956244 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5061578 | Kozuma et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5135820 | Jones | Aug 1992 | A |
5162168 | Downing et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5188911 | Downing et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5250158 | Kaneko et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5258241 | Ledjeff et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5308718 | Eidler et al. | May 1994 | A |
5316643 | Ahn et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318865 | Kaneko et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5366824 | Nozaki et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368762 | Sato et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5391973 | Tomazic | Feb 1995 | A |
5436087 | Tomazic | Jul 1995 | A |
5445905 | Marsh et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5459390 | Tomazic | Oct 1995 | A |
5587132 | Nakajima et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5601943 | Eidler et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5605771 | Eidler et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607788 | Tomazic | Mar 1997 | A |
5610802 | Eidler et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5612148 | Zito | Mar 1997 | A |
5626986 | Jahns et al. | May 1997 | A |
5643692 | Ohmi | Jul 1997 | A |
5650239 | Lex et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5656390 | Kageyama et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665212 | Zhong et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5702842 | Tomazic | Dec 1997 | A |
5716733 | Tomazic | Feb 1998 | A |
5759711 | Miyabayashi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5798180 | Chowdhury et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5804329 | Amendola | Sep 1998 | A |
5851694 | Miyabayashi et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5910366 | Chowdhury et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6005183 | Akai et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6040075 | Adcock et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6086643 | Clark et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096179 | Fajt et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6143443 | Kazacos et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6242125 | Eidler et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261714 | Eidler et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6455187 | Tomazic | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461772 | Miyake et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468688 | Kazacos et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475661 | Pellegri et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6497973 | Amendola | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6509119 | Kobayashi et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6555267 | Broman et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558833 | McCoy | May 2003 | B2 |
6562514 | Kazacos et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6610433 | Herdeg et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6613298 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624383 | Lichtenstein et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6652819 | Shiroto et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6692862 | Zocchi | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6711036 | Winter | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6759158 | Tomazic | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6761945 | Adachi et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6764663 | Monaghan et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764789 | Sekiguchi et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6812171 | Shimazaki et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6864012 | Tomazic | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872376 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6905797 | Broman et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6986966 | Clarke et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7046531 | Zocchi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7060738 | Jing et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060756 | Jing et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7061205 | Shigematsu et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071271 | Thaler et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7078123 | Kazacos et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7112614 | Jing et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7173067 | Guerra | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181183 | Hennessy | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7184903 | Williams et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7199550 | Tsutsui et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214443 | Clarke et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7220515 | Ito et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7227275 | Hennessy et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7252905 | Clarke et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258947 | Kubata et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259208 | Guerra et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265162 | Yandrasits et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7265456 | Hennessy | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7270911 | Clarke et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7297437 | Clarke et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7309540 | Wang | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7314761 | Winter | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7320844 | Skyllas-Kazacos | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7326737 | Guerra | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7332065 | Shimamune | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7353083 | Hennessy | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7389189 | Williams et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7411022 | Guerra et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7517608 | Brereton et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7537859 | Samuel et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7554220 | Sugawara | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7557531 | Willets et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7560189 | Clarke et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7625663 | Clarke et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7670719 | Nakaishi et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7682728 | Harper | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7687193 | Harper | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7704634 | Deguchi et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7740977 | Lepp et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7820321 | Horne et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7855005 | Sahu | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7919204 | Sahu | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7923965 | Ritter et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7927731 | Sahu | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7939190 | Colello et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7976974 | Kazacos et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7993932 | Winter | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8008808 | Seeker et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8029944 | Yau et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8039161 | Winter | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8048555 | Darcy et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8137830 | Whitacre | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8137831 | La O' et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8168337 | Friesen et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8182940 | Ridley | May 2012 | B2 |
8202641 | Winter et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8221911 | Kumamoto et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8222043 | Winter | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20010055713 | Eidler et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030007370 | Winter | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030008204 | Winter et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030082427 | Prasad et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030113615 | Tomazic | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030143456 | Kazacos et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030165741 | Maly-Schreiber et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040070370 | Emura | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040121204 | Adelman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040170893 | Nakaishi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040202915 | Nakaishi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040241544 | Nakaishi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040241552 | Skyllas-Kazacos | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050074653 | Broman et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050074665 | Spaziante et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050118494 | Choi | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050158614 | Hennessy | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050158615 | Samuel et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164075 | Kumamoto et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050244707 | Skyllas-Kazacos et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050287436 | Kawashige et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060063065 | Clarke et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060183016 | Kazacos et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070021300 | Farant | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070035135 | Yoshida | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070072067 | Symons et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070246352 | Keister | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080193828 | Sahu | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080292964 | Kazacos et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080299439 | Wang | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090017379 | Inatomi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090110998 | Miyachi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090130525 | Miyachi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090197151 | Kumamoto et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090208807 | Miyachi et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090212262 | Elson et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225573 | Sugawara | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090253025 | Whitacre | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090295162 | Oohara et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100003545 | Horne et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100047671 | Chiang et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100086829 | Ridley | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100089480 | Sahu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100090651 | Sahu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100092757 | Nair et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100092807 | Sahu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100092843 | Conway | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094468 | Sahu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100112391 | Salloum et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100119895 | Friesen | May 2010 | A1 |
20100119937 | Winter | May 2010 | A1 |
20100136455 | Winter | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100143781 | Keshavarz et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100178533 | Whitehead et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188045 | Colello et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100216006 | Rennebeck | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100243459 | Friesen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100261070 | Keshavarz et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100285375 | Friesen et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100316935 | Friesen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100323264 | Chiang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100330437 | Burchardt et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110014527 | Ohlsen | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110045332 | Horne et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110052945 | Whitacre | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110070483 | Keshavarz et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110070506 | Friesen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110074357 | Parakulam et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110076526 | Zu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110079074 | Sahu | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110080143 | Parakulam et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110081561 | Keshavarz et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110081562 | Parakulam et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110086247 | Keshavarz et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110086278 | Friesen et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110117411 | Horne et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110189520 | Carter et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110189549 | Sun et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110189551 | Friesen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110195283 | Sun et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110200853 | Winter | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110200890 | Kocherginsky | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110200893 | Friesen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110204637 | Ritter et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110206960 | Winter | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110223450 | Horne et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110223451 | Winter et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110244277 | Gordon, II et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110250512 | Friesen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110256435 | Kim et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110269055 | Perry | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110273022 | Dennis et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110273129 | Coe et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110274950 | Whitacre | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110281169 | Zheng et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110281184 | Friesen et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282807 | Colello et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110300417 | Mou et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110305959 | Friesen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110311846 | Whitacre | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110311896 | Harper et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110315934 | Ma et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110316485 | Krishnan et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110318619 | Winter | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110318644 | Zhai et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120009491 | Friesen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120015264 | Friesen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120021303 | Amendola et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120040254 | Amendola et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120045669 | Darcy et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120045680 | Dong et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120052347 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120052404 | Friesen et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120058370 | Kell et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120064388 | Whitacre et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120068667 | Friesen et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120077067 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120077068 | Wang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120077079 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120077095 | Roumi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120107660 | Li et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120107661 | Lee et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120115069 | Noack et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120129021 | Winter | May 2012 | A1 |
20120135278 | Yoshie et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120139496 | Krishnan et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120156535 | Harrer et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120164498 | Vincent et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120168975 | Perry et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120171530 | Lee et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120171531 | Park et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120171541 | Park et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120183816 | Keshavarz et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120183872 | Keshavarz et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185187 | Parakulam et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185572 | Parakulam et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101213700 | Jul 2008 | CN |
57-9072 | Jan 1982 | JP |
59-205165 | Nov 1984 | JP |
60-070672 | Apr 1985 | JP |
60-115174 | Jun 1985 | JP |
60-148068 | Aug 1985 | JP |
61-173468 | Aug 1986 | JP |
61-269866 | Nov 1986 | JP |
62-52861 | Mar 1987 | JP |
62-108465 | May 1987 | JP |
62-119874 | Jun 1987 | JP |
63-24565 | Feb 1988 | JP |
63-76268 | Apr 1988 | JP |
63-148563 | Jun 1988 | JP |
63-150867 | Jun 1988 | JP |
64-12466 | Jan 1989 | JP |
64-82465 | Mar 1989 | JP |
1-176227 | Jul 1989 | JP |
1-176228 | Jul 1989 | JP |
6-79491 | Oct 1994 | JP |
6-325784 | Nov 1994 | JP |
8-78042 | Mar 1996 | JP |
09-101286 | Apr 1997 | JP |
10-162852 | Jun 1998 | JP |
3242205 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002-329523 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2002329523 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003142141 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-173812 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003173812 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003317788 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-335158 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004335158 | Nov 2004 | JP |
3642697 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-142056 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-209525 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005-228617 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005-228622 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005-228633 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005-228645 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005-243326 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005-322447 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2005-322448 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2005-340029 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2005-340030 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2005-347106 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2005-347107 | Dec 2005 | JP |
3729296 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006-12425 | Jan 2006 | JP |
3738227 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006-40591 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006-40648 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006-73471 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-93016 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006-107988 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006-114359 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006-114360 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006-147306 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006-147374 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006-147375 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006-147376 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006-156029 | Jun 2006 | JP |
3797578 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006-253023 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2006-254682 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2006-302643 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2006-351346 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2006351346 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2009-16216 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009-16217 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009-16218 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009-16219 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2010-86935 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2010-170782 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2010-244972 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2010-277810 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2010-277811 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2011-119283 | Jun 2011 | JP |
9003666 | Apr 1990 | WO |
9939397 | Aug 1999 | WO |
0103221 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0176000 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0183364 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2004079849 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005001981 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005014484 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2006135958 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007101284 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007130659 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008148148 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009106452 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009156259 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010094657 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010118060 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2010142080 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2010143634 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011022390 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011044778 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011075135 | Jun 2011 | WO |
20111080334 | Jul 2011 | WO |
20111088761 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011111254 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011111717 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011123102 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011129215 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011136256 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2011137895 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2011149624 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012006479 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012020277 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012022532 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012038497 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012051156 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012051973 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012097286 | Jul 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report & Written Opinion, PCT/US2009/049789, dated Feb. 25, 2010, 6pgs. |
The Redox Flow System for Solar Photovoltaic Energy Storage, Patricia O'Donnell et al., NASA, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, E-9006; NASA-TM-X-73562, 1976, 8pgs. |
International Bureau of WIPO. International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Intl. Application PCT/09/49789. Jan. 20, 2011. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/063787, mailed on Jul. 30, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/US2012/021095, having a mailing date of Jul. 25, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/US2012/031174, having a mailing date of Oct. 10, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China; Chinese application No. 200980126611.8; issued on Jan. 14, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/US2011/063787, having a mailing date of Jun. 20, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/US2012/020656, having a mailing date of Jun. 18, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/US2012/020668, having a mailing date of Jun. 18, 2013. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/049789, mailed on Feb. 25, 2010. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/049789, mailed on Jan. 20, 2011. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/020656, mailed on Jun. 27, 2012. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/020668, mailed on Jun. 27, 2012. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/021095, mailed on Jun. 27, 2012. |
Sano, Noriaki, et al. “Synthesis of carbon nanotubes in graphite microchannels in gas-flow and submerged-in-liquid reactors”; Materials Chemistry and Physics; vol. 122; pp. 474-479; Apr. 18, 2010. |
Chieng, S.C. et al., “Modification of Daramic, mircoporous separator, for redox flow battery applications”; Univ. New South Wales, School of Chemical Eng. Industrial Chemistry, Kensington N.S.W. 2033, Australie; vol. 75; No. 1-2; pp. 81-91; 1992. |
Codina, G. et al., “Development of a 0.1 kW power accumulation pilot plant based on a Fe/Cr redox flow battery Part 1. Considerations on flow-distribution design”; Journal of Power Sources; vol. 48; pp. 293-302; Jul. 23, 1993. |
Codina, G. et al., “Scale-up studies of an Fe/Cr redox flow battery based on shunt current analysis”; Journal of Applied Electrochemistry; vol. 22; pp. 668-674; Sep. 1, 1991. |
Cunningham, Brent et al., “Development of bipolar plates for fuel cells from graphite filled wet-lay material and a thermoplastic laminate skin layer”; ScienceDirect; Journal Power Sources; vol. 165; pp. 764-773; Aug. 7, 2006. |
Cunningham, Brent; “Development of Compression Moldable Polymer Composite Bipolar Plates for Fuel Cells”; Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dissertation; Macromolecular Science and Engineering; Feb. 5, 2007. |
Demopoulos, George et al., “New Technoogies for HCI Regeneration in Chloride Hydrometallurgy”; World of Metallurgy—ERZMETALL 61; No. 2; 2008. |
Dolle, Mickael et al., “Synthesis of nanosized zirconium caride by a sol-gel route”; Journal of European Ceramic Society; ISSN 0955-2219; 2007. |
Erkoc, E. et al., “Effect of pulsed flow on the performance of carbon felt electrode”; Chemical Engineering Journal; vol. 85; pp. 153-160; Feb. 7, 2001. |
Faith, Khalid et al., “Advancements in the Direct Hydrogen Redox Fuel Cell”; Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters; 11 (2) B11-B15; Aug. 16, 2007. |
Fedkiw, Peter et al., “Mathematical Model for the Iron/Chromium Redox Battery”; Department of Chemical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Admittance Study of The Pb Electrode; Apr. 1984. |
Friedrich J.M. et al., “Reticulated vitreous carbon as an electrode material”; Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry; Apr. 10, 2003. |
Gahn, Randall et al., “Cycling Performance of the Iron-Chromium Redox Energy Storage System”; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Cleveland, Ohio; Aug. 18-23, 1985. |
Gahn, Randall et al., “Preformance of Advanced Chromium Electrodes for the NASA Redox Energy Storage System”; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Cleveland, Ohio; Nov. 1981. |
Gahn, Randall et al., “Single Cell Preformance Studies on the Fe/Cr Redox Energy Storage System using Mixed Reactant Solutions at Elevated Temperature”; Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference; vol. 4; Aug. 21-26, 1983. |
Giner, J. et al., “Advanced Screening of Electrode Couples”; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Cleveland, Ohio; Feb. 1980. |
Giner, J. et al., “Screening of Redox Couples and Electrode Materials”; Giner, Inc., National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Cleveland, Ohio; Sep. 1976. |
Gonzalez-Garcia, Jose et al., “Hydrodynamic Behavior of a Filter-Press Electrochemical Reactor with Carbon Felt as a Three-Dimensional Electrode”; American Chemical Society; vol. 37; pp. 4501-4511; 1998. |
Gonzalez-Garcia, Jose et al., “Characterization of a carbon felt electrode: structural and physical properties”; Journal of Materials Chemistry; Received Jul. 27, 1998, Accepted Nov. 13, 1998. |
Hagg, Ch. M. et al., “Novel bipolar electrodes for battery applications”; Journal of Applied Electrochemistry; vol. 32; pp. 1063-1069; Received Apr. 5, 2001; accepted in revised form Jun. 12, 2002. |
Hamamoto, Osamu et al., “Research and Development of 10kw Class Redox Flow Battery”; NEDO; Proceedings of the 20th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference; vol. 2; Aug. 1985. |
Hodgson, Isaac; “Pressure Drop, Liquid Holdup and Mass Transfer in a Graphite Fiber Bed with Upward Co-Current Gas-Liquid Flow”; B. Sc (Hons) University of Science and Technology; Ghana; Aug. 1993. |
Hollax, E. et al., “The Influence of Oxidative Pretreatment of Graphite Electrodes on the Catalysis of the Cr3/Cr2 and Fe2/Fe2 Redox Reactions”; Carbon; vol. 23; No. 6; pp. 655-664; Received Oct. 8, 1984; Revised Dec. 17, 1984. |
Inoue, M. et al., “Carbon Fiber Electrode for Redox Flow Battery”; Journal of the Electrochemical Society; Accelerated Brief Communications; Mar. 1987. |
Izawa, Hidetaka, “Research and Development of 10kw Class Redox Flow Battery”; 21st Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference; Advancing Toward Technology Breakout in Energy Conversion; Aug. 25-29, 1986. |
Jain, Anubhav, “Systhesis and Processing of Nanocrystalline Zirconium Carbide Formed by Carbothermal Reducation”; A Thesis presented to The Academic Faculty; Georgia Institute of Technology; Aug. 2004. |
Jalan, Vinod et al., “Optimization and Fabrication of Porous Carbon Elecrodes for Fe/Cr Redox Flow Cells”; U.S. Department of Energy Conservation and Renewable Energy Division of Energy Storage Systems; Jul. 1982. |
Jalan, Vinod et al., “Requirements for Optimization of Electrodes and Electrolyte for the Iron/Chromium Redox Flow Cell”; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Sep. 1981. |
Joerissen, Ludwig et al., “Possible use of vanadium redox-flow batteries for energy storage in small grids and stand-alone photovoltaic systems”; Science Direct ; Journal of Power Sources; vol. 127; pp. 98-104; 2004. |
Johnson, David et al., “Chemical and Electrochemical Behavior of the Cr(III)/Cr(II) Half-Cell in the Iron—Chromium Redox Energy Storage System”; J. Electrochem. Soc.; Electrochemical Science and Technology; May 1985. |
Jones, Janet et al., “Ligand Bridging in the Oxidation of Chromium (II) at Mercury Electrodes”; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena, CA; Jan. 24, 1964. |
Kim, Jun Gyu et al., “Microstructure and mechanical properties of chemical vapor deposited ZrC film on SiC/graphite substrate”; Journal of Ceramic Processing Research; vol. 10; No. 1; pp. 21-24; 2009. |
Kuhn, A.T. et al., “Electrical leakage currents in bipolar cell stacks”; Journal of Applied Electrochemisty; vol. 10; pp. 233-237; Mar. 27, 1979. |
Lampitt, L.H. et al., “The photochemical oxidation of ascorbic acid in solutions containing oxalic acid. II—Mechanisn of the reaction”; Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture; vol. 7; issue 2; pp. 120-124; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com; published online May 8, 2006. |
Leong, Chia-ken et al., “Pressure Electrical Contact Improved by Carbon Black Paste”; Journal of Electronic Materials; vol. 33; No. 3; 2004. |
Lopez-Atalaya, M. et al., “Behavior of the Cr(III)/Cr)II) reaction on fold-graphite electrodes. Application to redox flow storage cell”; Journal of Power Sources; vol. 35; pp. 225-234; Oct. 5, 1990. |
Lopez-Atalaya, M. et al., “Optimization studies on a Fe/Cr redox flow battery”; Journal of Power Sources; vol. 39; pp. 147-154; Nov. 15, 1991. |
Cnobloch, H et al., “Redox Ion Flow Cell for Solar Energy Storage”; Siemens forsch—u. ENtwickl.-Ber. Bd. 12; 1983. |
Mayer, Peter et al., “Electocatalysis of redox reactions by metal nanoparticles on graphite electrodes”; Journal of Solid State Electrochem; vol. 5; pp. 402-411; published online May 16, 2001. |
Middelman, E. et al., “Bipolar plates for PEM fuel cells”; Science Direct; Journal of Power Sources; vol. 118; pp. 44-46; 2003. |
Mohammadi, Touraj et al., “Modification of a Composite Membrane for Redox Flow Battery Applications”; Iranian Palyn er Animal I, vol. 6, No. I; School of Chem. Eng. and Ind. Chem.; Unvi. of New South Wales; Received Apr. 2, 1996, accepted Nov. 17, 1996. |
Mohammadi, F. et al., “Overcharge in the vanadium redox battery and changes in electrical resistivity and surface funtionality of graphite-felt electrode”; Journal of Power Sources; vol. 52; pp. 61-68; Received Feb. 2, 1994; accepted Apr. 25, 1994. |
Muller, A. et al., “Injection moulding of graphite composite bipolor plates”; Science Direct; Journal of Power Sources; vol. 154; pp. 467-471; available online Dec. 28, 2005. |
Nava, J.L. et al., “Mass Transport and Potential Studies in a Flow-through Porous Electrode Reactor. A Comparative Study of Reticulated Vitreous Carbon and Graphite Felt Used as Cathode”; Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta ISSN 1647-1571; Nov. 20, 2008. |
Noah, Karl et al., “Hydrogen Reduction of Ferric Ions for Use in Copper Electrowinning”; Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory; Jan. 2005. |
Nozaki, Ken et al., “Performance of ETL 1 KW Redox Flow Cell”; 18th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference; vol. 4; Aug. 21-26, 1983. |
Nozaki, Ken et al., “Performance of ETL new 1 KW Redox Flow Cell System”; 19th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference; vol. 2; Aug. 19-24, 1984. |
Nozaki, Ken et al., “Research and Development of Redox-Flow Battery”; 17th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference; Aug. 8-12, 1982. |
Oei, Djong-Gie, “Permeation of vanadium cations through anionic and cationic membranes”; Journal of Applied Electrochemistry; vol. 15; No. 2; pp. 231-235; Mar. 1985. |
Ozdemir, T. et al., “Treatment of Waste Pickling Liquors; Process Synthesis and Economic Analysis”; Chemical Engineering Communications; vol. 193; Issue 5; May 2006. |
Pecsok, R.L. et al., “Metal Ammine Formation in Solution XI. Stability of Ethylenediamine Complexes and the Coordination Number of Chromium (II)”; Univ. of Denmark; Acta Chem. Scand.; vol. 11; No. 8; 1957. |
Petrii, O.A. et al., “The nature of anomalous cathodic behavior of metals with high hydrogen overpotential: thallium in acidic solutions”; Russian Journal of Electrochemistry; vol. 31; pp. 921-929; 1995. |
Ponce De Leon, C. et al., “Redox flow cells for energy conversion”; Science Direct; Journal of Power Sources; vol. 60; pp. 716-732; Oct. 19, 2005. |
O'Donnell, Patricia et al., “The Redox Flow System for Solar Photovoltaic Energy Storage”; E-9006; STAR Category 44; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Lewis Research Center; Cleveland, Ohio; 1976. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion issued PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/031174, mailed on Nov. 7, 2012. |
Extended European Search Report issued in European Application No. 09795056, having a mailing date of Mar. 31, 2014. |
European Search Report issued in European Application No. 12762830 (PCT/US2012/031174) mailed on Aug. 6, 2014. |
Shah et al., A Dynamic Performance Model for Redox-Flow Batteries Involving Soluble Species, Electrochimica Acta 53 (2008) 8087-8100, Elsevier. Jun. 2, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110045332 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61093017 | Aug 2008 | US | |
61078691 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12498103 | Jul 2009 | US |
Child | 12883511 | US |