This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/769,688, entitled: Commutation of An Electromagnetic Propulsion and Guidance System, filed Jun. 27, 2007.
The disclosed embodiments relate to electromagnetic bearings and motors, in particular to a self bearing motor with a reduced number of winding sets.
In certain applications utilizing motors, materials must be processed in a controlled, clean atmosphere where microscopic contaminates may represent a severe problem. In those applications, cleanliness may be directly related to yield, which may in turn affect cost. Other motor applications may include processing steps utilizing hostile atmospheres of highly corrosive gases and high temperatures. Motors with contact bearings may wear, produce particulate contamination, and eventually fail due to the hostile environment. Bearings may also exhibit an unacceptable amount of vibration and play before failing.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,818,137, issued on Oct. 6, 1998 describes an integrated magnetic motoring and suspension system with a stator that has permanent magnets that lift the rotor, eight control windings that stabilize the radial position and tilt orientation of the rotor, and drive windings that actuate the rotor. U.S. Pat. No. 6,707,200, issued on Mar. 16, 2004 describes a rotational magnetic gimbal with an integral magnetic bearing that utilizes four equal length coil segments, each having at least two phases. Torque is applied to each of the coil segments independently (or to groups of coil segments, e.g., as in three-phase motors) to achieve both a desired rotational speed and a desired radial position. U.S. Pat. No. 7,078,839, issued on Jul. 18, 2006 describes a self bearing asymmetrical stepper motor with five coil segments having three phases each. Magnitudes of the currents supplied to the respective coils vary according to a geometric eccentricity of the center of the rotor, and accordingly different magnetic forces are generated from the respective electromagnets. Due to the difference in the magnetic forces, the rotor can be supported and compensation is provided for the geometric deviation.
The disclosed embodiments are directed to a method of commutating a motor including operatively interfacing a stator and actuated component of the motor, arranging at least two winding sets relative to the actuated component, and independently controlling the at least two winding sets so that with the at least two winding sets the actuator is both driven and centered.
In another embodiment, an apparatus for commutating a motor includes at least two winding sets arranged relative to an actuated component of the motor, and commutation circuitry operable to independently control the at least two winding sets so that with the at least two winding sets the actuated component is both driven and centered.
In still another embodiment a motor includes a stator having at least two independently controlled winding sets, an actuated component operatively interfacing the stator, and a controller communicatively connected to the at least two winding sets for controlling the at least two winding sets to independently drive and center the actuated component, where the at least two winding sets are arranged relative to the actuated component and the controller is programmed to control the at least two winding sets so that with the at least two winding sets the actuated component is both driven and centered.
In other embodiments, a substrate processing apparatus has a motor with a stator having at least two independently controlled winding sets, an actuated component operatively interfacing the stator, and a controller communicatively connected to the at least two winding sets for controlling the at least two winding sets to independently drive and center the actuated component, wherein the at least two winding sets are arranged relative to the actuated component and the controller is programmed to control the at least two winding sets so that with the at least two winding sets the actuated component is both driven and centered.
In other embodiments, a method of commutating a motor includes calculating an adjustment electrical angle, and utilizing the adjustment electrical angle in a common set of commutation equations to independently torque and actively center a rotor of the motor so that the rotor is actively centered with at least two of the motors winding sets.
In another embodiment, a method of commutating a motor includes calculating an adjustment electrical angle and entering the adjustment electrical angle into commutation equations for commutating a motor to independently torque and actively center a rotor of the motor so that the rotor is actively centered with at least two of the motors winding sets.
In another embodiment, an apparatus for commutating a motor includes circuitry for calculating an adjustment electrical angle, and a current amplifier operable to utilize the adjustment electrical angle in a common set of commutation equations so that the common set of commutation equations is capable of producing both torque and active centering forces in motors with at least two winding sets and in motors with at least three winding sets.
In still another embodiment, a motor includes a rotor, and windings driven by a current amplifier, the current amplifier having circuitry for calculating an adjustment electrical angle, and an amplifier operable to utilize the adjustment electrical angle in a common set of commutation equations so that the common set of commutation equations is capable of producing both torque and active centering forces that are different from each other in the motor, where the motor is at least one of a two winding set motor or a three winding set motor.
In yet another embodiment, a substrate processing apparatus includes a controller for commutating a motor including circuitry for calculating an adjustment electrical angle, and a current amplifier operable to utilize the adjustment electrical angle in a common set of commutation equations so that the common set of commutation equations is capable of producing both torque and active centering forces that are different from each other in the motor, wherein the motor is at least one of a two winding set motor or a three winding set motor.
In yet a further embodiment, a substrate processing apparatus includes a motor having a rotor and windings driven by a current amplifier, the current amplifier having circuitry for calculating an adjustment electrical angle, and an amplifier operable to utilize the adjustment electrical angle in a common set of commutation equations so that the common set of commutation equations is capable of producing both torque and active centering forces that are different from each other in the motor, where the motor is at least one of a two winding set motor or a three winding set motor.
The foregoing aspects and other features of the presently disclosed embodiments are explained in the following description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Motor 100 includes an actuated component 110, in this embodiment in the form of a rotor, and winding sets 115, 120. For purposes of the disclosed embodiments, it should be understood that the term actuated component includes a device that performs a motion or applies a force in response to forces generated by the winding sets described herein. The rotors and platens of the disclosed embodiments are examples of actuated components.
The embodiment of exemplary motor 100 depicted in
The current amplifier 125 may also include a processor 127, a commutation function 130 and a current loop function 135 for driving the winding sets. The processor may generally control and coordinate the operations of commutation and current loop functions. The processor may provide the commutation parameters to the commutation function 130, which as shown in block 40, may determine commanded currents for one or more windings of each winding set according to a set of commutation equations. In block 50, the current loop function 135 may provide actual currents to the motor windings 115, 120. The current loop function may also provide a feedback and driving capability for maintaining the current through the windings as determined. Each current amplifier disclosed herein includes circuitry, hardware or software in any combination as required to perform the functions and computations for the disclosed embodiments.
It should be understood that individual winding sets 215, 220 may have any suitable orientation. Current amplifier 225 may drive winding sets 215, 225, and may include software, hardware, or any combination of software and hardware suitable for driving the winding sets. A processor 230, a commutation function 235 and a current loop function 240 may be utilized by current amplifier 225 for driving winding sets 215, 225 similar to the embodiment of
The disclosed embodiments are directed to a self-bearing motor that advantageously utilizes a minimal number of winding sets to affect the self bearing motor function. For example, one or more embodiments may utilize as few as two of a motor's winding sets to produce the forces required for self bearing. The windings may include any type of winding suitable for use in the disclosed embodiments.
The disclosed embodiments may utilize the same windings to provide substantially decoupled torque forces and radial forces in order to actively control the center of rotation of the actuated component or rotor in the rotary embodiments. In the linear embodiments the same windings may be utilized to provide substantially decoupled linear forces in the direction of motion and guidance forces for actively controlling the platen around a distance across the gap between the stator and the platen. For purposes of the disclosed embodiments linear forces in the direction of motion and torque are referred to collectively as driving forces. For purposes of the disclosed embodiments, the radial forces for actively controlling the center of rotation of the rotor in the rotary embodiments, and the guidance forces across the gap between the stator and the platen are referred to collectively as centering forces.
The disclosed motor embodiments may include segmented windings, for example, winding sets divided into one or more winding subset sets distributed along desired portions of the rotor or platen. Each winding subset set may include one or more windings and may be driven to produce substantially decoupled radial and tangential forces simultaneously for rotary embodiments and to provide substantially decoupled propulsion and guidance forces for linear embodiments. In at least one embodiment, an adjustment electrical angle may be calculated and utilized in a common set of commutation equations to energize the windings. Other commutation implementations may also be utilized. As mentioned above, the actuated components of the embodiments, for example, rotor 110 and platen 210 may be actively centered with as few as two of the motors winding sets (i.e., the rotor 110 and platen 210 may be actively centered with no more than 2 of the motor winding sets). Additional embodiments of the self bearing motor may utilize a novel arrangement of windings and magnetic poles.
Some embodiments of the self-bearing motor may utilize as few as two winding sets and as few as two control channels. One or more commutation functions may be utilized which provide forces along both tangential and radial directions to the actuated component in the form of a rotor, or along motion and guidance directions to the actuated component in the form of a platen. Lorentz and Maxwell type forces may be employed. Optimization techniques may be employed to improve efficiencies in generating driving and centering forces.
A sensor system may be included that provides both position and gap feedback. For example, the sensor system may be configured to provide simultaneous position measurement along a first and second axis. The sensor system may also be capable of providing measurement along a third axis, either simultaneously with the first and second axis measurements or individually. In one or more embodiments, the sensor system may provide all measurements individually, simultaneously or in any combination. In at least one embodiment one axis may extend tangentially to the motor rotor or platen while another axis may be orthogonal to the surface of the rotor or platen.
In further embodiments, position and gap feedback for the motor embodiments are obtained utilizing a limited number of sensors. In at least one embodiment, as few as two pairs of sensors may be used, eliminating the need for multiple numbers of sensor devices. Within each pair, the sensors may be positioned some number of mechanical or electrical degrees apart. Counterpart sensors in the first pair may be positioned a certain number of mechanical or electrical degrees apart from counterpart sensors in additional pairs. In at least one embodiment, two pairs of sensors are used to provide feedback for the disclosed motors.
Applications of the disclosed embodiments may include any suitable motor application, for example, robotics in semiconductor processing. Self-bearing motors as disclosed may also be utilized as replacements for regular bearings. For example, self bearing motors may be advantageously used by drive shafts that control robotic arms. The elimination of contact bearings advantageously reduces particle generation and reducing the number of amplifier channels provides cost savings in hardware implementation.
In the exemplary embodiments, the stators may have an “iron” core (e.g. stator backing made of any suitable material, such as ferromagnetic material), or the motors may have coreless stators. The relationships for desired driving forces torque (T) and centering forces (Fx) along the x-axis and (Fy) along the y-axis for the embodiments shown in
In at least one embodiment, the relationships may be utilized to determine appropriate phase current amplitudes (Ij, j=A, B, C, . . . ) and electrical angle offsets (Δj, j=A, B, C, . . . ) for each winding set that will concurrently produce decoupled torque T and radial forces Fx, Fy in the motor. Once determined, the phase current amplitudes (Ij, j=A, B, C, . . . ) and electrical angle offsets (Δj, j=A, B, C, . . . ) may be used with a common set of commutation functions to produce a desired torque (T) and also desired centering forces (Fx) along the x-axis and (Fy) along the y-axis.
In some embodiments, the motor may be driven by a 3 phase sinusoidal commutation. In other embodiments, as an alternative to sinusoidal commutation, space vector modulation may be used for wye-configured windings to produce equivalent sine-wave currents through the windings.
Referring to
It should be understood that the relationships, calculations and resulting commutation schemes are exemplary and that any suitable commutation solutions may be utilized in the disclosed embodiments to determine decoupled driving and centering forces. While two winding sets are shown it should be understood that the motor may include additional windings or winding sets in addition to those used according to the disclosed embodiments. It should also be understood that any number of winding sets may be utilized to provide the desired decoupled driving and centering forces of the embodiments described herein. While winding sets A 315 and B 320 are shown offset by about 180 degrees it should be understood that other offsets may also be utilized.
As noted before the stator on which the winding sets are disposed may have iron backing (e.g. a cored stator) or the stator may be coreless. Exemplary force relations, for this embodiment of
T=R(FtA+FtB) (1)
Fx=FtA−FtB (2)
Fy=FrA−FrB (3)
It can be seen that the force relations are expressed as 3 equations and 4 unknowns. An additional equation may be obtained, for example, by finding the minimum of the following cost function.
J=FrA2+FrB2 (4)
It should be noted that the cost function used above is an example which conveniently distributes the y-direction force equally between the two winding sets, and prevents the different radial forces from interfering with each other. Other cost functions may also be used to solve the problem. For example, another cost function may be utilized that is based on currents drawn by the windings.
The minimization of the cost function above will provide the minimum radial forces subjected to the constraints of (1) to (3):
Solving (1) and (2) for FtA and FtB:
The following force/current relations may be utilized for the embodiment utilizing Lorentz forces of
FtA=1.5KtIA cos ΔA (9)
FrA=1.5KrIA sin ΔA (10)
FtB=1.5KtIB cos ΔB (11)
FrB=1.5KrIB sin ΔB (12)
where:
Using (7) to (12):
For purposes of the disclosed embodiments, all arc tangent functions (a tan) described herein may also be interpreted as a four quadrant inverse tangent functions (a tan 2) and the corresponding arguments therefore.
The following exemplary motor commutation equations may be utilized:
iAj=IA sin [θA(x,z)−ΔA+(2π/3)j],j=0,1,2 (17)
iBj=IB sin [θB(x,z)−ΔB+(2π/3)j],j=0,1,2 (18)
where IA, ΔA, IB, ΔB control magnitudes and orientations of force vectors produced by winding sets A and B, and where:
Thus, in the example, by adjusting the electrical angles θA and θB with the electrical angle offsets ΔA and ΔB, a common or standard set of motor commutation equations may be used for producing desired torque (T) and active centering forces (Fx) along the x-axis and (Fy) along the y-axis utilizing, in this embodiment, only 2 winding sets producing Lorentz forces. Other commutation schemes using any suitable commutation implementation may also be employed.
A suitable exemplary technique utilizing a standard set of commutation equations in this manner may be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/769,688, entitled: Commutation of An Electromagnetic Propulsion and Guidance System, filed Jun. 27, 2007 which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Again referring to
The following force/current relations may be utilized for the embodiment of
FtA=1.5KtIA cos ΔA (19)
FrA=1.5KrIA sin ΔA+1.5KMIA2 (20)
FtB=1.5KtIB cos ΔB (21)
FrB=1.5KrIB sin ΔB+1.5KMIB2 (22)
The derivation may be separated into two cases, where Fy>0 and Fy<0 (with respect to the sign convention shown in
For the case where Fy>0, make
ΔB=0 (23)
in order, for example, to minimize the Maxwell force associated with winding set B 320 which would otherwise interfere with Fy.
For the case where Fy<0, make
ΔA=0 (24)
in order, for example, to minimize the Maxwell force associated with winding set A 315 which would otherwise interfere with Fy.
Therefore, for the exemplary case where Fy>0:
and for the exemplary case where Fy<0:
where aj, bj and cj, j=A, B, as a function of T, Fx and Fy are defined in Table 1 below:
By applying IA, ΔA, IB, ΔB as derived in the commutation functions 130 to drive winding sets A 315 and B 320, using for example (17) and (18) above, a common set of motor commutation equations may be used to produce desired torque (T) and active centering forces (Fx) along the x-axis and (Fy) along the y-axis utilizing, in this embodiment, only 2 winding sets producing both Lorentz and Maxwell forces.
Thus, similar to the embodiment above, by adjusting the electrical angles θA and θB with the electrical angle offsets ΔA and ΔB, a common or standard set of motor commutation equations may be used for producing desired torque (T) and active centering forces (Fx) along the x-axis and (Fy) along the y-axis utilizing, in this embodiment, only 2 winding sets producing Lorentz and Maxwell forces. Other commutation schemes using any suitable commutation implementation may also be utilized.
Exemplary relationships for the desired torque (T) and centering forces (Fx) along the x-axis and (Fy) along the y-axis for the segmented winding sets 515, 520 of the embodiment of
The force relations for this embodiment of
T=R(FtA0+FtB90+FtB0+FtA90) (33)
Fx=FtA0+FrA90−FtB0−FrB90 (34)
Fy=FrA0+FtA90−FrB0−FtB90 (35)
Note that the following equations hold because within each winding set the winding subsets are offset by 90 electrical degrees.
FrA0=βFtA90 (36)
FrA90=βFtA0 (37)
FrB0=βFtB90 (38)
FrB90=βFtB0 (39)
β=Kr/Kt (40)
The following force/current relations may be utilized for the embodiment of
FtA0=1.5KtIA cos ΔA (41)
FrA0=1.5KrIA sin ΔA (42)
FtB0=1.5KtIB cos ΔB (43)
FrB0=1.5KrIB sin ΔB (44)
In order to find a solution for IA, ΔA, IB, ΔB in terms of the radial and tangential forces, it is necessary to add one more equation since there are more variables than equations. There are many ways to solve this problem and different solutions can be obtained depending on the design criteria utilized. As an example, the additional equation is proposed to be obtained by minimizing the cost function below:
J=(FrA0)2+(FrA90)2+(FrB0)2+(FrB90)2 (45)
From equations (33) to (45) it is possible to arrive at the following solutions:
By applying the derived IA, ΔA, IB, ΔB in a commutation function, for example 130 (
Thus, similar to the embodiments above, by adjusting the electrical angles θA and θB with the electrical angle offsets ΔA and ΔB, a common or standard set of motor commutation equations may be used for producing desired torque (T) and active centering forces (Fx) along the x-axis and (Fy) along the y-axis utilizing, in this embodiment, only 2 winding sets producing Lorentz forces. Other commutation schemes using any suitable commutation implementation may also be employed.
As has been previously noted, the motor in the exemplary embodiment shown in
The force relations for this embodiment of
Assume:
FtA=FtB=FtC=Ft (57)
for the purposes of equally distributing the tangential forces that produce torque among the three winding sets. It should be understood that the equal distribution is an exemplary solution and that other techniques and force distributions may also be used to determine solutions for IA, ΔA, IB, ΔB. Other force distributions may be utilized, for example, by introducing a cost function as shown in the embodiments above. For example, a cost function may be utilized based on currents through the windings.
Using (54), (55), (56), and (57):
Similar to the embodiment of
J=FrA2+FrB2+FrC2 (61)
This gives the optimized solution as:
The following force/current relations may be utilized for the embodiment utilizing Lorentz forces of
Ftj=1.5IjKt cos Δj,j=A,B,C (65)
Frj=1.5IjKr sin Δj,j=A,B,C (66)
As a result:
where j represents each winding set and:
Similar to the embodiments above, Ij and Δj where j=A, B, C may be applied in commutation function 640, using for example commutation equations in the form of (17) as applicable for winding sets A, B and C, for providing the desired torque T and centering forces Fx, Fy using the three winding sets 615, 620, 625 producing Lorentz forces.
As with the embodiments above, the electrical angle may be adjusted using the electrical angle offset Δj where j=A, B, C in order to provide the desired torque and centering forces using a common set of motor commutation equations. Other commutation schemes using any suitable commutation implementation may also be employed.
Still referring to
[In this embodiment, a solution may be obtained based on the location of the desired centering force vector (Fx, Fy) relative to the three sectors A, B, and C defined for the motor of
The following force/current relations may be utilized for the embodiment of
Ftj=1.5IjKt cos Δj,j=A,B,C (73)
Frj=1.5IjKr sin Δj+1.5KMIj2,j=A,B,C (74)
An example solution for the embodiment of
and
Commutation functions for this embodiment may be derived in a manner similar to the embodiments described above. For example, as with the embodiments above, an electrical angle may be adjusted using an electrical angle offset Δj, j=A, B, C in order to provide the desired forces using a common set of motor commutation equations, for example, commutation equations in the form of (17) as applicable for winding sets A, B and C. Other commutation schemes using any suitable commutation implementation may also be employed.
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
T=R(FtA+FtB+FtC+FtD) (75)
Fx=FtA+FrB−FtC−FrD (76)
Fy=FrA+FtB−FrC+FtD (77)
Assume:
FtA=FtB=FtC=FtD=Ft (78)
for the purposes of equally distributing the tangential forces that produce torque among the four winding sets. It should be understood that the equal distribution is an exemplary solution and that other techniques and force distributions may also be used to determine solutions for Ij and Δj, j=A, B, C, D. Other force distributions may be utilized, for example, by introducing a cost function as shown in the embodiments above or another exemplary cost function. Another exemplary cost function may be based on currents through the windings.
Therefore:
Assume:
for the purposes of equally distributing the centering forces between the windings on opposite sides. As mentioned above, it should be understood that the equal distribution is an exemplary solution and that other techniques and force distributions may also be used.
The following force/current relations may be utilized for this embodiment of
Ftj=1.5IjKt cos Δj,j=A,B,C,D (86)
Frj=1.5IjKr sin Δj,j=A,B,C,D (87)
As a result:
for each winding set j, j=A 715, B 720, C 725, and D 730, where
Ij and Δj, j=A, B, C, D may be applied in commutation function 745 for providing the desired torque T and centering forces Fx, Fy using the 4 winding sets 715, 720, 725, and 430 producing Lorentz forces.
As with the embodiments above, the electrical angle may be adjusted using the electrical angle offset Δj, j=A, B, C, D in order to provide the desired torque and centering forces using a common set of motor commutation equations. Thus, the segmented windings A, B, C, D may be driven to produce decoupled torque and centering forces simultaneously to drive and center a rotor of the motor using the adjusted electrical angle in the common set of commutation equations. In addition, any other suitable commutation operations may also be utilized.
Again referring to
The following force/current relations may be utilized for the embodiment of
Frj=1.5IjKr sin Δj+1.5KMIj2,j=A,B,C (90)
An example solution for the embodiment of
in Table 3.
Commutation functions for this embodiment may be derived in a manner similar to the embodiments described above. For example, as with the embodiments above, an electrical angle may be adjusted using an electrical angle offset Δj, j=A, B, C, D in order to provide the desired forces using a common set of motor commutation equations, such as commutation equations in the form of (17) as applicable for winding sets A, B, C and D. Other commutation schemes using any suitable commutation implementation may also be employed.
As with the embodiments above, an electrical angle may be adjusted using the electrical angle offset Δj, j=A, B, C, D in order to provide the desired forces using a common set of motor commutation equations. Thus, the winding sets A, B, C, D may be driven to produce decoupled torque and centering forces simultaneously to torque and actively center a rotor of the motor using the adjusted electrical angle in the common set of commutation equations.
In the exemplary embodiment of
In the exemplary embodiment of
θ=a tan(A1/A2) (91)
where A1 and A2 are the signals from sensors Hall A1 and Hall A2, respectively.
The rotor displacement along the X and Y direction may be computed using both sets of sensors:
where A1 and A2 are the signals from sensors Hall A1 and Hall A2, respectively, and B1 and B2 are the signals from sensors Hall B1 and Hall B2, respectively, and where the constants KgX and KgY may be, for instance, experimentally determined against known gap references.
Therefore, in this embodiment only two pairs of Hall Effect sensors provide the positional feedback required for the disclosed embodiments. The alternating poles of the rotor may produce a sinusoidal output from each sensor as the rotor rotates. Thus, each pair of sensors 810, 815 produces a phase shifted sine wave output from which the rotor position may be determined. As shown above, an angle determined by the arctangent of the ratio of the two signals of, for example, sensors Hall A1 and Hall A2 may be calculated. In addition, the gap along the x and y axes may be determined by, for example, dividing corresponding constants by the 4th root of the sum of the squares of the two sensor signals output by each sensor pair.
Substrate processing apparatus 1000 also includes a controller 1700 that controls the operation of substrate processing apparatus 1000. Controller 1700 may include a processor 1730 and a memory 1780. Controller 1700 may be connected to substrate processing system 1000 through link 1830. For purposes of the disclosed embodiments a substrate may be for example, a semiconductor wafer (e.g. a 200 mm or 300 mm wafer), a flat panel display substrate, any other type of substrate suitable for processing by substrate processing apparatus 1000, a blank substrate, or an article having characteristics similar to a substrate, such as certain dimensions or a particular mass.
Atmospheric substrate transport apparatus 1200 may include one or more self-bearing motors, for example, 1600 according to the disclosed embodiments. Self-bearing motor 1600 may advantageously utilize a minimal number of winding sets to affect the self bearing motor function and may use the same windings to provide substantially decoupled driving and centering forces in accordance with the disclosed embodiments. Self-bearing motor 1600 may be driven by a current amplifier 1250, which may be similar to the current amplifiers described above. Vacuum substrate transport apparatus 1300 may also include one or more self-bearing motors 1900 in accordance with the disclosed embodiments. Self-bearing motor 1900 may be driven by one or more current amplifiers 1500, which are similar to the current amplifiers described above. Substrate processing apparatus 1000 may include other self bearing motors as disclosed herein wherever suitable.
In summary, the disclosed embodiments are directed to a self-bearing motor that advantageously utilizes a minimal number of winding sets to affect the self bearing motor function. Reducing the number of winding sets is advantageous because, for example, associated complex and costly control systems and electronics for controlling independent windings are also reduced. In at least one embodiment as few as two winding sets of a motor may be used to effect the self bearing motor function. In the disclosed exemplary rotary embodiments the same windings may be used to provide substantially decoupled driving and centering forces in order to actively control the center of rotation of the rotor. The same windings may be utilized to provide substantially decoupled propulsion and guidance forces to control a platen in the exemplary linear embodiments. The disclosed motor embodiments may include segmented windings, for example, windings distributed along desired portions of the rotor or platen and divided to form winding sets having one or more winding subsets. In addition, an exemplary sensor system may be included that provides both position and gap feedback. For example, the sensor system may be configured to provide simultaneous position measurement along a first and second axis. The sensor system may also be capable of providing measurement along a third axis, either simultaneously with the first and second axis measurements or individually.
It should be understood that the foregoing description is only illustrative of the present embodiments. Various alternatives and modifications can be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the embodiments disclosed herein. Accordingly, the embodiments are intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variances which fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2564221 | Hornfeck | Aug 1951 | A |
3205485 | Bernard | Sep 1965 | A |
3560774 | Reeves | Feb 1971 | A |
3697992 | Kleptz | Oct 1972 | A |
3750151 | Dill | Jul 1973 | A |
3860843 | Kawasaki | Jan 1975 | A |
4144110 | Luc | Mar 1979 | A |
4210865 | Nikolaev et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4360753 | Shannon | Nov 1982 | A |
4547678 | Metzner et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4556886 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4609332 | Miki | Sep 1986 | A |
4628499 | Hammett | Dec 1986 | A |
4659991 | Weischedel | Apr 1987 | A |
4689945 | Lattion | Sep 1987 | A |
4717874 | Ichikawa et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4737701 | Hoemann et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4774465 | Nilius | Sep 1988 | A |
4874998 | Hollis, Jr. | Oct 1989 | A |
4904937 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4922197 | Juds | May 1990 | A |
4956945 | Ooshima | Sep 1990 | A |
4992733 | Griebeler | Feb 1991 | A |
5003260 | Auchterlonie | Mar 1991 | A |
5015998 | Ellis et al. | May 1991 | A |
5092453 | Bruke | Mar 1992 | A |
5105113 | Ishikura | Apr 1992 | A |
5113102 | Gilmor | May 1992 | A |
5120034 | Van Engelen | Jun 1992 | A |
5124863 | Koizumi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5126610 | Fremerey | Jun 1992 | A |
5202695 | Hollandsworth | Apr 1993 | A |
5204621 | Hermann et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5210490 | Munch et al. | May 1993 | A |
5270600 | Hashimoto | Dec 1993 | A |
5285154 | Burreson | Feb 1994 | A |
5324155 | Goodwin | Jun 1994 | A |
5334892 | Chitayat | Aug 1994 | A |
5351004 | Daniels et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5386738 | Havenhill | Feb 1995 | A |
5444368 | Horber | Aug 1995 | A |
5450009 | Murakami | Sep 1995 | A |
5469053 | Laughlin | Nov 1995 | A |
5530306 | Ueyama | Jun 1996 | A |
5532531 | Sakamoto | Jul 1996 | A |
5550413 | Bernus | Aug 1996 | A |
5555715 | Paweletz | Sep 1996 | A |
5568048 | Schroeder et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5574364 | Kajimoto et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5589769 | Krahn | Dec 1996 | A |
5606256 | Takei | Feb 1997 | A |
5625240 | Bernus | Apr 1997 | A |
5633545 | Albrecht | May 1997 | A |
5641054 | Mori et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642298 | Mallory | Jun 1997 | A |
5656902 | Lowrance | Aug 1997 | A |
5670876 | Dilger et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5741113 | Bacchi | Apr 1998 | A |
5753991 | Couture et al. | May 1998 | A |
5801721 | Gandy | Sep 1998 | A |
5808389 | Stephenson | Sep 1998 | A |
5808437 | Schob | Sep 1998 | A |
5813823 | Hofmeister | Sep 1998 | A |
5818137 | Nichols | Oct 1998 | A |
5838121 | Fairbairn | Nov 1998 | A |
5886432 | Markle | Mar 1999 | A |
5899658 | Hofmeister | May 1999 | A |
5914548 | Watanabe | Jun 1999 | A |
5924975 | Goldowsky | Jul 1999 | A |
5932947 | Kim | Aug 1999 | A |
5955882 | Eisschiel et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961291 | Sakagami | Oct 1999 | A |
6015272 | Antaki | Jan 2000 | A |
6018881 | Spies | Feb 2000 | A |
6049148 | Nichols | Apr 2000 | A |
6054851 | Masreliez et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058760 | Van Heyningen | May 2000 | A |
6074180 | Khanwilkar et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078119 | Satoh | Jun 2000 | A |
6086362 | White | Jul 2000 | A |
6096231 | Schertler | Aug 2000 | A |
6097183 | Goetz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6100618 | Schoeb | Aug 2000 | A |
6100681 | Tsuruta | Aug 2000 | A |
6127749 | Sogard | Oct 2000 | A |
6144132 | Nashiki | Nov 2000 | A |
6147421 | Hazelton | Nov 2000 | A |
6158941 | Muka et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163148 | Takada et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175174 | Takahashi | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176668 | Kurita | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189404 | Hatake et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191415 | Stridsberg | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206176 | Blonigan | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208045 | Hazelton | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6227817 | Paden | May 2001 | B1 |
6235172 | Begin | May 2001 | B1 |
6244835 | Antaki | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246233 | Griffen et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249067 | Schob et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261247 | Ishikawa et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269552 | Honda | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285097 | Hazelton | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6285107 | Sawada | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299404 | Muka et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324134 | Ohtachi | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326750 | Marcinkiewicz | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6384500 | Chassoulier | May 2002 | B1 |
6414742 | Korenaga et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416215 | Terentiev | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6431011 | Feller | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445093 | Binnard | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447265 | Antaki | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447266 | Antaki | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6448760 | Neumann et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6471459 | Blonigan | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6485250 | Hofmeister | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485531 | Schöb | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6498411 | Kanebako | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6498451 | Boules et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499701 | Thornton et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6509732 | Rhodes et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518747 | Sager | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522130 | Lutz | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532791 | Schmid et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537011 | Wang | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6557957 | Nagata | May 2003 | B2 |
6559567 | Schob | May 2003 | B2 |
6559637 | Miyata | May 2003 | B2 |
6563306 | Sato | May 2003 | B2 |
6573088 | Gemmell | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6580190 | Takasu | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6595762 | Khanwilkar et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6617739 | Kinoshita | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621245 | Vaassen et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6625517 | Bogdanov | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629883 | Katsuoka et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6642711 | Kawate | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6646721 | Compter et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650079 | Binnard | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661220 | Glehr | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6690159 | Burreson et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6691074 | Moriya et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6698737 | Blessing | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707200 | Carroll et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6731107 | Reverdy | May 2004 | B2 |
6737826 | Gilchrist | May 2004 | B2 |
6781524 | Clark | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6784580 | Yashiro | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6800833 | Gregor | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6803758 | Nicholson | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6809450 | Morrison | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6810754 | May | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6813543 | Aalund | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6838844 | Shimizu et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853106 | Fujiwara et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6864955 | Nishi | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6876896 | Ortiz et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6877963 | Beyer | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6878044 | Sakurai | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6879063 | Frissen | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6879126 | Paden et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6909281 | Grassman et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916231 | Wakabayashi | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6917136 | Thornton | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6952086 | Krefta | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6989647 | Lee | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6991710 | Harris | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995534 | Berroth | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7005847 | Grassman et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7023118 | Morrison | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7030528 | Morgante | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7053582 | Ueyama | May 2006 | B2 |
7067952 | Neal | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7070398 | Olsen | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087143 | Schmidt | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7115066 | Lee | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7135855 | Nyce | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7164120 | Strasser | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7187143 | Okada | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7196604 | Sills | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7208945 | Jones | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7211918 | Migita | May 2007 | B2 |
7229258 | Wood | Jun 2007 | B2 |
RE39748 | Watanabe | Jul 2007 | E |
7246985 | Ferrara | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248037 | Hara et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7262527 | Neal | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7264430 | Bischof | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7292656 | Kloper | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7315164 | Hata et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7325559 | Darut | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7339370 | Reimer et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7352553 | Kozaki | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371306 | Davis | May 2008 | B2 |
7400141 | Taniguchi | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7424830 | Matsusaki et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7467930 | Ozaki | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7518273 | Kataoka | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7596425 | Asa | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7633201 | Buhler | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7897025 | Inoue | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8052504 | Kalenian | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8104488 | Rye | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8129984 | Hosek et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20010036398 | Hofmeister | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044266 | Katsuoka et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020041168 | Mann et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020060548 | Iwaji et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020089324 | Miyata et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020105241 | Carroll | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020145722 | Compter | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149270 | Hazelton | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020153790 | Kanebako et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030011338 | Gilchrist | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030056815 | Sakai | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030085676 | Binnard | May 2003 | A1 |
20030102721 | Ueta et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030111912 | Binnard | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030183611 | Gregor | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030223853 | Caveney et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236644 | Lara et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040016891 | Roes | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021437 | Maslov | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040056617 | Berroth | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040070300 | Fu | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040072499 | Wakabayashi | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040075426 | Wakiyama et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040124729 | Long | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151562 | Hofmeister et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040217667 | Popov | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239285 | Neuvonen | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261550 | Asa | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261944 | Wakabayashi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263000 | Vreugdewater | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002743 | Moriya et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050083496 | Dansberg | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050151544 | Mahoney et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050184689 | Maslov | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050194843 | Korenaga | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050264119 | Carroll et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050265814 | Coady | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050269892 | Duff | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050285550 | Simons et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060099063 | Pietrantonio et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060113949 | Nishimura et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060125473 | Frachon et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060131967 | Lin et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060164697 | Larson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060205553 | Lee | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060219275 | Weber | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060238053 | Kascak et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060244333 | Jeung | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060275155 | Thibodeau | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060279149 | Asper | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070020081 | Gilchrist et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070065144 | Hofmeister et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070120556 | Dufour et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126304 | Ito et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070164697 | Cox et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070194787 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070267920 | Korenaga | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070295089 | Velinsky et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299625 | Englert et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080067968 | Binnard | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080116881 | May | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120164 | Hassler | May 2008 | A1 |
20080121064 | Todorov | May 2008 | A1 |
20090243413 | Gilchrist et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100178135 | Laceky et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110025310 | Moura et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1226307 | Aug 1999 | CN |
1360536 | Jul 2002 | CN |
129731 | Jan 1985 | EP |
0121084 | Jan 1989 | EP |
414127 | Feb 1991 | EP |
526903 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0565746 | Oct 1993 | EP |
641061 | Mar 1995 | EP |
675824 | Oct 1995 | EP |
758157 | Feb 1997 | EP |
760244 | Mar 1997 | EP |
816701 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0897476 | Feb 1999 | EP |
1081390 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1052761 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1054498 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1114648 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1176999 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1732011 | Dec 2006 | EP |
1552874 | Sep 1979 | GB |
2035622 | Jun 1980 | GB |
61152304 | Jul 1986 | JP |
61152304 | Jul 1986 | JP |
1023468 | Jan 1989 | JP |
1023468 | Jan 1989 | JP |
1240268 | Sep 1989 | JP |
1240268 | Sep 1989 | JP |
0236313 | Feb 1990 | JP |
3125212 | Mar 1990 | JP |
02193547 | Jul 1990 | JP |
3178747 | Aug 1991 | JP |
3276317 | Dec 1991 | JP |
4209996 | Jul 1992 | JP |
4308823 | Oct 1992 | JP |
04364752 | Dec 1992 | JP |
5130762 | May 1993 | JP |
5130762 | May 1993 | JP |
623687 | Feb 1994 | JP |
0623687 | Feb 1994 | JP |
6213233 | Aug 1994 | JP |
3147568 | Sep 1994 | JP |
7012091 | Jan 1995 | JP |
07255158 | Mar 1995 | JP |
7131966 | May 1995 | JP |
7131966 | May 1995 | JP |
07161790 | Jun 1995 | JP |
07255158 | Oct 1995 | JP |
8323505 | Dec 1996 | JP |
8323505 | Dec 1996 | JP |
09269007 | Oct 1997 | JP |
10023781 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10023781 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10070865 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10316241 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11030502 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11166803 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2000131006 | May 2000 | JP |
2001074006 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001156150 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001224154 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001351874 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002026105 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002511571 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2004245703 | Sep 2004 | JP |
200368620 | Oct 2004 | JP |
4308823 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005158826 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005223997 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005223997 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005534176 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006013371 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006014592 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006214736 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006014592 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007019216 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2007024694 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2008516457 | May 2008 | JP |
2008196894 | Aug 2008 | JP |
4712379 | Jun 2011 | JP |
960517 | Jul 1996 | TR |
304391 | Dec 2008 | TW |
342898 | Jun 2011 | TW |
WO8912907 | Dec 1989 | WO |
WO9414653 | Jul 1994 | WO |
9742413 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO9837335 | Aug 1998 | WO |
9904481 | Jan 1999 | WO |
9953266 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO0102211 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO0102721 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO0231372 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0241473 | May 2002 | WO |
WO03029651 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO2004098677 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO2005003565 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO2005030296 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005114848 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2006010285 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO2006053384 | May 2006 | WO |
2007029623 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007068496 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO2008003943 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008039943 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2009003186 | Dec 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Halbach Magnetic Rotor Development, Gallo, C.A., NASA Glenn Research Center, Report No. NASA/TM-2008-215056; E-16281, Feb. 2008, p. 27, CASI. |
Electromagnetic design of a low-fringing-field magnetic bearing stage for electron beam lithography: Special issue on magnetic bearing, Konkola et al., JSME international journal, Series C, Mechanical Systems, 2003, vol. 46, pp. 370-377. |
Magnetically levitated planar actuator with moving magnets, Jansen et al., Ieee International Electric Machines and Drives Conference, 2007, pp. 272-278, IEEE. |
Analysis and design of synchronous permanent magnet planar motors, Cho et al., Power Engineering Review, Jul. 2002, vol. 22, pp. 52-52, IEEE. |
A surface motor-driven planar motion stage integrated with an XY0(z) surface encoder for precision positioning, Goa et al., Precision Engineering Journal of the International Societies for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology, 2004, vol. 28, pp. 329-337. |
Nonlinear Control design for a Magnetic Levitation System, Rafael Becerril Arreola, Thesis for Master of Applied Science, 2003, http://www.control.utoronto.ca/lab/references/Rafael—Becerril—03.pdf. |
Analysis and implementation of a tubular motor with Halbach magnetarray, Kim et al., Industry Application Conference, 1996, vol. 1, pp. 471-478, San Diego, CA, IEEE. |
Design and analysis of helical motion permanent magnet motor with cylindrical Halbach array, Jang et al., IEEE Transactions, Sep. 2003, vol. 39, pp. 3007-3009. |
Desgin of Magnetically levitated 2D drive, Etxaniz et al., COMPEL, 2006, vol. 25, pp. 732-740, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. |
Analysis and Control of 2-DOF Magnetic Levitation Stage Using Force Decoupling Theorem, Park et al., SICE-ICASE, 2006, pp. 1091-1095. |
Analysis and comparison of two-dimensional permanent magnet array for planar motor, Duan et al., Magnetics, IEEE Transactions, Nov. 2004, vol. 40, pp. 3490-3494. |
Arreola, Rafael Becerril, Output feedback nonlinear control for a linear motor in suspension mode, Automatica, 2004, Elsevier, 2004. |
Carpenter, C.J. Electromagnetic induction in terms of Maxwell force instead of magnetic flux, Science, Measurement and Technology, lEE Proceedings, Jul. 1999, vol. 146, Issue 4, pp. 182-193. (abstract) IEEE [online] [retreived on Sep. 8, 2008 (Sep. 8, 20080] Retrieved from the Intemet: <URL: http://ieeexplore.leee.org/xplifreeabs—all.jsp?tp=&arnum ber-790323&isn u mber-17150>. |
Kim et al., Design and Control of a 6-DOF High-Precision Integrated Positioner, Proceeding of the 2004 American Control Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, Jun. 30-Jul. 2, 2004, pp. 2493-2498, 2004, AACC. |
Thornton et al., The MangeMotion Maglev System M3, TRB 2003 Annual Meeting CD-ROM, pp. 1-15, 2003. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 10, 2009; Application PCT/US08/68680. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 25, 2011; Application PCT/US08/68661. |
“A Study of the Rotor Eccentricity Compensation of Bearingless Induction Motor,” Zhang et al., Jun. 2004, pp. 148-150, 164 and 201, vol. 8, No. 2, Editorial Board of Electric Machines & Control, China. |
“Static Torque Profiles of a Hybrid Stepper Motor Having Eccentricity Between Stator and Rotor Axes,” Rajagopal et al., May 15, 2003, pp. 8701-8703, vol. 93, No. 10, A.I.P., Journal of Applied Physics, United States. |
“Sinusoidal Shaft Position Encoder,” Benarous et al., Mar. 31-Apr. 2, 2004, IEEE Conference Publication 2004, No. 498, pp. 132-136, IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives. |
“Sine-Cosine Rotation Sensor for 360 Degree Angle Measurement Sensors,” Wereb, J.A., 1995, pp. 40-41, vol. 12, No. 11, Elweco, Inc., United States. |
“A New CMOS Hall Angular Position Sensor,” Technisches Messen, Popovic et al., 2001, pp. 286-291, vol. 68, No. 6, Jun., Swiss Fed. Institute Tech., Lausanne, Switzerland. |
“A Novel Multi-DOF Presision Positioning Methodology Using Two-Axis Hall-Effect Sensors,” Kawato et al., 2005 American Control Conference, Jun. 8-10, 2005, pp. 3042-3047, IEEE. |
“A New Two-Axis Magnetic Position Sensor,” Schott et al., 2002, pp. 911-915, IEEE. |
“The Long-Range Scanning Stage: A Novel Platform for Scanned-Probe Microscopy,” Precision Engineering—Journal of the International Societies for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology, 2000, pp. 191-209, vol. 24, Elsevier Science, Inc., United States. |
International Search Report, PCT/US 08/68160, Sep. 11, 2008, 1 page. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US08/68160, Sep. 11, 2009, 31 pages. |
International Search Report, PCT/US 08/68161, Oct. 22, 2008, 1 page. |
International Search Report, PCT/US 08/68167, Sep. 11, 2008, 1 page. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US08/68167, Sep. 22, 2009, 8 pages. |
International Search Report, PCT/US2008/068670, Sep. 2, 2008, 1 page. |
International Search Report, PCT/US2008/068680, Sep. 3, 2008, 2 pages. |
International Search Report, PCT/US2008/068682 Sep. 3, 2008, 1 page. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US08/68682, Aug. 12, 2009, 8 pages. |
International Search Report, PCT/US 08/68684 Oct. 19, 2008, 1 page. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2008/068684, Jan. 5, 2010, 5 pages. |
“Electromagnetic induction in terms of the Maxwell force instead of magnetic flux,” Science Measurement and Technology, IEEE Proceedings, Jul. 1999, vol. 146, Issue 4, pp. 182-193. (abstract). |
Chinese Office Action in CN Application No. 200880104585.4 dated Mar. 7, 2012. |
Chinese Office Action in CN Application No. 200880104666.4 dated Aug. 18, 2011. |
Chinese Office Action in CN Application No. 200880104585.4dated Jan. 19, 2011. |
Yan, et al, “Coding of Shared Track Grey Encoder,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, Sep. 2000, pp. 573-576, vol. 122, ASME. |
International Search Report, PCT/US/2008/070346, Oct. 7, 2008. |
Taiwan IPO search Report, Application No. 097124040, dated May 19, 2013, 1 page. |
Taiwan IPO Search Report, Application No. 097124035, dated Jul. 31, 2013. |
Taiwan IPO Search Report, Application No. 097124039 dated Aug. 1, 2013. |
Taiwan IPO Search Report, Application No. 097124034 dated Aug. 1, 2013. |
Chinese Search Report, Application No. 08801046679 dated Seo. 27, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report of Patentability dated Jan. 19, 2010; Application PCT/US08/070346. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090001917 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |