Internal combustion engines emit gaseous pollutants such as carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), unburned hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxide (NOx) as well as solid pollutants such as particulate matter. As legislation has tightened the rules for vehicle emissions, new exhaust purification systems have been developed to reduce emissions. Most of the exhaust lines for internal combustion engines include one or more catalysts to reduce gaseous pollutants. Environmental concerns and government regulations have led to efforts focused on improving the removal of combustion by-products and exhaust pollutants from vehicle engine exhaust gases. Common exhaust lines are typically equipped with one or more components, such as a particulate filter, sensors, or a catalytic converter, in order to reduce pollutants from the high concentrations observed directly from the engine to low concentrations at the tailpipe.
In conventional exhaust lines having a particulate filter, the particulate filter will need to be cleaned on a regular basis to remove trapped particulates and maintain exhaust flow therethrough. Particulate filters are typically cleaned through a process referred to as regeneration. During filter regeneration, soot trapped in the filter is combusted and burnt off to prevent soot accumulation and make sure the passages through the filter remain open. The trapped soot may be burnt off by heating the filter to a temperature sufficient to combust the soot, which may be accomplished through passive regeneration (where additional efforts to increase the exhaust temperature is not needed, e.g., where sufficient heat is generated from high engine usage such as by driving at high speeds and/or for a minimum duration) or through active regeneration (where additional efforts are used to increase the exhaust temperature, e.g., using post combustion fuel injection into the combustion chamber to increase the temperature of the exhaust). Thus, particulate filters are typically positioned as close to the engine as possible to provide the heat needed for regeneration.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
In one aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a system for reducing internal combustion engine emissions including a main exhaust line fluidly connected to an internal combustion engine. A multi-particulate filter assembly is connected between the main exhaust line and the tailpipe. The multi-particulate filter assembly may include a first particulate filter along a first filter line and a second particulate filter along a second filter line. First and second ozone injectors may be positioned upstream of the first and second particulate filters. A valve may be located between the main exhaust line and the multi-particulate filter assembly, such that when the valve is in a first position, the exhaust line is in fluid communication with the first filter line, and when the valve is in a second position, the flow between the main exhaust line and the first filter line is bypassed. Systems disclosed herein may also include an oxidation catalyst, e.g., provided as a coating in the particulate filter(s) or provided in oxidation catalyst units downstream of the particulate filter(s).
In another aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to processes for reducing internal combustion engine emissions by flowing exhaust emissions through a main exhaust line from an internal combustion engine and alternating filtering the exhaust emissions with a first particulate filter and a second particulate filter in a multi-particulate filter assembly. When alternating the exhaust emissions flow pathways, one or more valves may be adjusted in a first mode to flow the exhaust emissions to the first particulate filter, bypassing the second particulate filter. In the first mode, exhaust emissions may be filtered with the first particulate filter, collecting soot on the first particulate filter. During the first mode, the second particulate filter may receive an injected ozone stream to combust an amount of soot on the second particulate filter, producing carbon monoxide. During a second mode, the one or more valves may be adjusted to flow the exhaust emissions to the second particulate filter, bypassing the first particulate filter. During the second mode, the first particulate filter may receive injected ozone to combust soot on the first particulate filter, producing carbon monoxide.
Other aspects and advantages of the claimed subject matter will be apparent from the following description and the appended claims.
Wherever possible, like or identical reference numerals are used in the figures to identify common or the same elements. The figures are not necessarily to scale and certain features and certain views of the figures may be shown exaggerated in scale for purposes of clarification.
As used herein, the terminology “example,” “embodiment,” “element,” or the like indicates serving as an example, instance, or illustration. Unless expressly indicated, any example, embodiment, aspect, feature, or element is independent of each other example, embodiment, aspect, feature, or element and may be used in combination with any other example, embodiment, aspect, feature, or element. Thus, features from any of the embodiments described herein may be used in combination with one another in accordance with the general principles described herein. These and other embodiments, features, and advantages will be more fully understood upon reading the following detailed description.
In one aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a system for reducing internal combustion engine emissions including an assembly of multiple particulate filters and an oxidation catalyst. In another aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a process for reducing internal combustion engine emissions including alternating operating different particulate filters in a multi-particulate filter assembly while regenerating a non-operating filter in the multi-particulate filter assembly.
Particulate filters may be used to collect particulate matter in engine emissions before entering into the environment. Particulate filters generally include structures having one or more filters (e.g., meshes, porous material, fibrous material, etc.) positioned through a flow path to catch particulates as they are flowed therethrough. For example, common particulate filters may have honeycomb structures of filter material with channel blocks at alternate ends. Engine emissions flow through the walls of the particulate filter between the channels, retaining particulate matter. Particulate filters may cause a large pressure drop in the exhaust line, reducing the power of the engine and increasing fuel consumption. Selection of particulate filter may be based on filtration efficiency and back pressure (as it relates to volumetric flow). Examples of relevant materials for particulate filters include cordierite and silicon carbide.
In one or more embodiments, soot may be removed from a particulate filter in a regeneration process by burning it off in-situ in the presence of ozone and at temperatures between 10° and 300° C., when a particulate filter is not in use for filtration operations. To initiate regeneration, the particulate filter may be injected with ozone for short periods. This ozone, combined with high exhaust temperatures (e.g., between 10° and 300° C.), leads to soot ignition. Regeneration processes are used to remove accumulated particulate matter from the filter that may block flow of the exhaust.
In one or more embodiments, methods of reducing engine emissions using particulate filters include flowing exhaust emissions through an exhaust line from an internal combustion engine through a multi-particulate filter assembly. Multi-particulate filter assemblies according to embodiments of the present disclosure may include two or more particulate filters assembled together with associated ozone injectors and oxidation catalyst via valve(s) and piping. Examples of multi-particulate filter assemblies according to embodiments of the present disclosure are described herein with reference to a double particulate filter assembly having two particulate filters for ease of description and understanding. However, the designs and operations described with reference to double particulate filters may likewise be applied to multi-particulate filter assemblies having more than two particulate filters (e.g., three particulate filters, four particulate filters, five particulate filters, or more, as room allows in the exhaust system).
A double particulate filter assembly according to embodiments of the present disclosure may include a first particulate filter and a second particulate filter, associated ozone injector(s), and an oxidation catalyst. During methods according to embodiments of the present disclosure, exhaust emissions may be alternatingly flowed through the first particulate filter and the second particulate filter in the double particulate filter assembly. In such manner, an operating particulate filter (the first or second particulate filter) may be filtering the exhaust emission flow while a non-operating particulate filter (the other of the first or second particulate filter) may undergo a regeneration process.
For example, in a system containing a double particulate filter assembly, a first particulate filter may be in operation, filtering out particulate matter from the engine exhaust emissions, while a second particulate filter is in a regeneration process. A separate ozone injector may be located upstream of each of the particulate filters. Ozone may be produced in an ozone generator and supplied to both of the ozone injectors. An ozone generator produces ozone from oxygen. During regeneration of the second particulate filter in the double particulate filter assembly, the ozone injector associated with the regenerating second particulate filter may inject ozone upstream of the second particulate filter for use in the regeneration process. The regeneration process generates additional carbon monoxide in the engine emissions, which will be fed to an oxidation catalyst in the double particulate filter assembly to reduce the presence of this harmful compound into the environment. Upon completion of regeneration of the second particulate filter, the process may include alternating operational status of the particulate filters, where the second regenerated particulate filter may be operated to filter out the engine exhaust emissions while the first particulate filter is regenerated.
As mentioned above, other multi-particulate filter assemblies having more than two particulate filters may be assembled and used applying the same concepts and principles described herein with respect to the examples of double particulate filter assemblies. For example, in multi-particulate filter assemblies having more than two particulate filters, exhaust emissions may be alternatingly flowed through different particulate filters (e.g., using one or more valves), where one or more operating particulate filters may be filtering exhaust while the remaining particulate filter(s) (non-operating) may undergo a regeneration process. Ozone may also be supplied to regenerating particulate filter(s) in multi-particulate filter assemblies having more than two particulate filters using the same principles described herein with respect to the examples of double particulate filter assemblies.
Alternating operation processes disclosed herein may be achieved through adjusting one or more valves based on the configuration of the particulate filters in the multi-particulate filter assembly, e.g., based on where first and the second particulate filters are located relative to each other in a double particulate filter assembly. For example, according to embodiments of the present disclosure, a valve may be located between the exhaust line and the double particulate filter assembly, where in a first position, the valve allows exhaust emissions to flow through a first filter line with the first particulate filter, and in a second position, the valve allows exhaust emissions to bypass the first filter line (thus bypassing the first particulate filter). In some embodiments, the valve positioned between the exhaust line and the double particulate filter assembly used to direct flow through or bypass the first filter line may also be used to direct flow through or bypass a second filter line with the second particulate filter. In such embodiments, a double particulate filter assembly may have a single valve, where in the first position, the valve allows exhaust emissions to flow through the first filter line (and first particulate filter), and in the second position, the valve allows exhaust emissions to flow through the second filter line (and second particulate filter). In some embodiments, a double particulate filter assembly may have multiple valves, where a first valve located between the exhaust line and the double particulate filter assembly may be used to direct flow through or bypass the first filter line, and a second valve within the double particulate filter assembly may be used to direct flow through or bypass the second filter line. According to embodiments of the present disclosure, valve(s) in a double particulate filter assembly may be used to control the flow of exhaust emissions through a selected path in the double particulate filter assembly to the tailpipe.
Using various valve configurations, an alternating of particulate filter operation and regeneration allows for continuous, effective particulate filtration and oxidation catalysis of engine exhaust emissions. For example, one or more valves may first be adjusted to a first mode allowing the exhaust emissions to flow through a first particulate filter of a double particulate filter assembly, during which, soot be collected on the first particulate filter. During the first mode, the positions of the valve(s) may block flow to a second particulate filter in the double particulate filter assembly. While flow to the second particulate filter is blocked, the second particulate filter may receive an injected ozone stream to combust an amount of soot on the second particulate filter in a regeneration process, producing carbon monoxide to be reacted with an oxidation catalyst. After a period for regeneration, the valve(s) may be adjusted to a second mode to prevent flow to the first particulate filter and allow the exhaust emissions to flow to the second particulate filter. During the second mode, the first particulate filter may receive an injected ozone stream to combust an amount of soot on the first particulate filter in a regeneration process, producing carbon monoxide to be reacted with an oxidation catalyst. In some embodiments, multiple particulate filters (some or all of the particulate filters in a multi-particulate filter assembly) may be operated simultaneously. In some embodiments, multiple particulate filters (some or all of the particulate filters in a multi-particulate filter assembly) may be regenerated simultaneously.
According to embodiments of the present disclosure, an oxidation catalyst provided with a multi-particulate filter assembly may convert carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons in the exhaust emissions into carbon dioxide and water. In some embodiments, the oxidation catalyst may be in the form of a coating on the internal porous structure within each of the particulate filters in a multi-particulate filter assembly. For example, an oxidation catalyst coating may include one or more platinum group metals (PGM) mixed inside a washcoat (e.g., made of alumina (Al2O3) with mixed oxides (e.g., CeO2, ZrO2, La2O3, TiO2 . . . )), where the washcoat is impregnated on a particulate filter substrate (e.g., made of cordierite and/or silicon carbide). Platinum and/or palladium may be selected as PGM oxidation catalyst coating material for conversion of pollutants, such as rhodium. In one or more embodiments, an oxidation catalyst coating used in a multi-particulate filter assembly may have a loading of about 25 g/ft3 or less. For example, with a particulate filter having 1 L (about 0.036 ft3) catalyst with a 25 g/ft3 loading, the catalyst may contain approximately 0.9 g of platinum-group metals (e.g., platinum and/or palladium). In one or more embodiments, an oxidation catalyst coating may include platinum, palladium, or both.
In other embodiments, particulate filters in a multi-particulate filter assembly may not contain a catalyst coating, and instead, a separate catalyst unit may be situated downstream of the particulate filters. In these embodiments, there may be a catalyst unit shared between some or all of the particulate filters in a multi-particulate filter assembly, or there may be a separate catalyst unit for each of the particulate filters in a multi-particulate filter assembly.
In some embodiments, sensors may be present to monitor system parameters. For example, in some embodiments, temperature sensors and/or pressure sensors may be present at the inlet of each particulate filter. In some embodiments, pressure sensors may also be present at the outlet of each of the particulate filters. In other embodiments, pressure sensors may be present at the inlet and outlet of the overall multi-particulate filter assembly. In some embodiments, temperature sensors may be present at the inlet and outlet of the overall multi-particulate filter assembly. In some embodiments, the sensors may communicate data to an Electronic Control Unit (ECU) configured to develop a soot combustion model.
Referring now to
While double particulate filter assemblies are shown in the examples in
In
In one or more embodiments, an inlet to a double particulate filter assembly may be directly connected to an end of the main exhaust line, and an outlet of the double particulate filter assembly may be directly connected to the tailpipe. For example, the inlet to the double particulate filter assembly 200 in
In
In
In
In
In
Various example valve configurations are illustrated in
The system configuration of
The system configuration of
The system configuration of
In addition to the benefits of alternating between operating filtering and non-operating regenerating particulate filters, embodiments of the present disclosure may allow for a multi-particulate filter assembly to be positioned in an engine's exhaust system proximate to the exhaust system's outlet to the ambient environment. For example, in one or more embodiments, a multi-particulate filter assembly may be connected directly to a tailpipe of an exhaust system, where the tailpipe is the short segment of pipe forming the exhaust system's outlet to the ambient environment. In such embodiments, the multi-particulate filter assembly may replace the muffler in an engine exhaust system.
As shown in
According to embodiments of the present disclosure, a multi-particulate filter assembly may be located between 2 and 5 meters away from the engine 1310. The position of the multi-particulate filter assembly may be optimized based on the temperature of the engine, where the multi-particulate filter assembly may be in a location along a main exhaust line having exhaust with temperatures ranging from 100 to 300° C., e.g., for optimal ozone regeneration.
Multi-particulate filter assemblies may be used in exhaust systems of different types of engines having different configurations. For example, a multi-particulate filter assembly according to embodiments of the present disclosure may be used for various engines including those that utilize gasoline, Diesel, natural gas, and electrofuels.
As seen in
The particulate filter temperature is less consistent over time than the changes in soot mass. The temperature oscillates for a particulate filter during filtering and regeneration, including temperature declines during and following the regeneration process, and temperature inclines and oscillations during filtering operations. In
Ozone injection is shown to pulse to the on position at the beginning of the regeneration cycles only for the particulate filter undergoing regeneration. For example, at the beginning of the regeneration cycle for PF1 in time period B, ozone is injected from an associated ozone injector only to PF1, while no ozone is injected to PF2.
Embodiments of the present disclosure may provide at least one of the following advantages. The system configurations allow for continuous operation of a particulate filter while regenerating a separate non-operating particulate filter, improving efficiency of the system. By either coupling an oxidation catalyst with the particulate filter (e.g., as a coating) or situating the oxidation catalyst downstream of the particulate filter, this allows for the oxidation catalyst to convert carbon monoxide resulting from soot combustion of the particulate filter regeneration process before exiting the system into the environment.
Additionally, systems disclosed herein may provide a reduction in particulate filter back pressure by placing the particulate filter assembly near the tailpipe because the volumetric flow rate of exhaust through the exhaust system is lower at the tailpipe compared with the rest of the exhaust system. Thus, the exhaust system outlet position of double particulate filter assemblies according to embodiments of the present disclosure may in turn provide a reduction in engine power loss and a reduction in over-consumption of fuel. Also, by using double particulate filter systems in the disclosed exhaust system outlet positions, a double particulate filter assembly may replace a muffler, such that the engine exhaust system does not have a muffler, which may present an opportunity for cost savings.
Further, using ozone in double particulate filter assemblies according to embodiments of the present disclosure ensures soot combustion occurs at a lower temperature (between 100 to 300° C.) than when in the presence of oxygen (>600° C.), thereby negating the need for additional heat added to the system as typically occurs with oxygen-based soot combustion.
Although only a few example embodiments have been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the example embodiments without materially departing from this invention. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4702075 | Jenny | Oct 1987 | A |
7735314 | Lu et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7954313 | Hirata | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8161732 | Peters et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
9021792 | Hosoya | May 2015 | B2 |
9482125 | Gonze et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9719386 | Fan | Aug 2017 | B2 |
10072551 | Uchiyama et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10590827 | Ulrey et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
11661872 | Laigle et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
20020175212 | Hepburn | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20050241295 | Breuer | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060153761 | Bandl-Konrad | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080271439 | Londos | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090235648 | Kakinohana | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090308060 | Suzuki | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100281856 | Sakakibara | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287911 | Katsuki | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20140366515 | Kowalkowski et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20170102311 | Zhang | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20180334982 | Sanborn et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180353905 | Li et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190017423 | Martin et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190383189 | Dou | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20220220875 | Laigle et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20220290599 | Dou et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2396281 | Dec 2001 | CA |
665002 | Apr 1988 | CH |
108223060 | Jun 2018 | CN |
10241063 | Mar 2004 | DE |
102017102098 | Aug 2017 | DE |
1947303 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2859240 | Mar 2005 | FR |
2004084494 | Mar 2004 | JP |
3600582 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005330936 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2005538295 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2007132240 | May 2007 | JP |
2008002308 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2008175136 | Jul 2008 | JP |
4344565 | Oct 2009 | JP |
4449947 | Apr 2010 | JP |
201121456 | Feb 2011 | JP |
100864600 | Oct 2008 | KR |
2006117993 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2006125928 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2006135073 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2008053105 | May 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action issued in corresponding Domestic U.S. Appl. No. 17/144,535; dated Jul. 23, 2021 (18 pages). |
Yusuf, A.A. et al., “Effect of cold start emissions from gasoline-fueled engines of light duty vehicles at low and high ambient temperatures: Recent trends,” Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 14, 100417, pp. 1-10, Feb. 20, 2019 (10 pages). |
Final Office Action issued in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 18/324,764, dated Mar. 26, 2024 (24 pages). |
International Search Report issued for corresponding international patent application No. PCT/US2024/030401, mailed Sep. 3, 2024 (6 pages). |
Written Opinion issued for corresponding international patent application No. PCT/US2024/030401, mailed Sep. 3, 2024 (9 pages). |