Reduced pressure treatment system having blockage clearing and dual-zone pressure protection capabilities

Abstract

A method of treating a tissue site is provided. The method includes applying a reduced pressure to a tissue site with a reduced pressure source. A source pressure is monitored at the reduced pressure source, and a differential pressure is determined between the source pressure and the desired tissue site pressure. If a blockage is present between the reduced pressure source and the tissue site, the differential pressure is limited to a first maximum differential pressure. If no blockage is present between the reduced pressure source and the tissue site, the differential pressure is limited to a second maximum differential pressure.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to tissue treatment devices and in particular to a reduced pressure treatment system having blockage clearing and dual-zone pressure protection capabilities.

2. Description of Related Art

Clinical studies and practice have shown that providing a reduced pressure in proximity to a tissue site augments and accelerates the growth of new tissue at the tissue site. The applications of this phenomenon are numerous, but one particular application of reduced pressure has involved treating wounds. This treatment (frequently referred to in the medical community as “negative pressure wound therapy,” “reduced pressure therapy,” or “vacuum therapy”) provides a number of benefits, including migration of epithelial and subcutaneous tissues, improved blood flow, and micro-deformation of tissue at the wound site. Together these benefits result in increased development of granulation tissue and faster healing times.

While reduced pressure can greatly benefit wound care and other instances where increased tissue growth is indicated, the amount of reduced pressure applied to a tissue site must be controlled to prevent damage to tissue and the possibility of excessive bleeding. It is a common occurrence for blockages to develop in systems that provide reduced pressure therapy. The usual method for addressing these blockages involves the application of additional negative pressure. This additional negative pressure can present a hazard to the safe use of these devices. A need therefore exists for a reduced pressure treatment system and method that is capable of balancing the application of reduced pressure to encourage tissue growth, yet prevent over application of reduced pressure that may cause damage to the tissue.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The problems presented in controlling the pressures applied by a tissue treatment system are solved by the systems and methods of the present invention. In one embodiment, a reduced pressure treatment system is provided that includes a reduced pressure source fluidly connected to a tissue site. A sensing device is provided in communication with the reduced pressure source to measure a source pressure at the reduced pressure source. A processing unit is in communication with the sensing device and is configured to determine a differential pressure between the source pressure and a desired tissue site pressure. The processing unit is further in communication with the reduced pressure source to regulate the source pressure applied by the reduced pressure source. The pressure is regulated such that the differential pressure does not exceed (a) a first maximum differential pressure if a blockage is present between the reduced pressure source and the tissue site and (b) a second maximum differential pressure if no blockage is present between the reduced pressure source and the tissue site.

In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a method of treating a tissue site is provided. The method includes applying a reduced pressure to a tissue site with a reduced pressure source. A source pressure is monitored at the reduced pressure source, and a differential pressure between the source pressure and the desired tissue site pressure is determined. If a blockage is present between the reduced pressure source and the tissue site, the differential pressure is limited to a first maximum differential pressure. If no blockage is present between the reduced pressure source and the tissue site, the differential pressure is limited to a second maximum differential pressure.

In still another embodiment of the present invention, a reduced pressure treatment system includes a means for applying reduced pressure to a tissue site and a means for monitoring a source pressure at the means for applying reduced pressure. The system further includes a means for determining a differential pressure between the source pressure and the desired tissue site pressure. A means is provided for limiting the differential pressure to a first maximum differential pressure if a blockage is present between the tissue site and the means for applying reduced pressure. The system further includes a means for limiting the differential pressure to a second maximum differential pressure that is higher than the first maximum differential pressure if no blockage is present between the tissue site and the means for applying reduced pressure.

Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent with reference to the drawings and detailed description that follow.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic of a reduced pressure treatment system having a reduced pressure therapy unit according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 depicts a block diagram of the reduced pressure therapy unit of FIG. 1; and

FIG. 3 illustrates a flow chart of an exemplary method of treating a tissue site according to an embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

In the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific preferred embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical structural, mechanical, electrical, and chemical changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. To avoid detail not necessary to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, the description may omit certain information known to those skilled in the art. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims.

The term “reduced pressure” as used herein generally refers to a pressure less than the ambient pressure at a tissue site that is being subjected to treatment. In most cases, this reduced pressure will be less than the atmospheric pressure at which the patient is located. Although the terms “vacuum” and “negative pressure” may be used to describe the pressure applied to the tissue site, the actual pressure applied to the tissue site may be significantly less than the pressure normally associated with a complete vacuum. Consistent with this nomenclature, an increase in reduced pressure or vacuum pressure refers to a relative reduction of absolute pressure, while a decrease in reduced pressure or vacuum pressure refers to a relative increase of absolute pressure.

The term “tissue site” as used herein refers to a wound or defect located on or within any tissue, including but not limited to, bone tissue, adipose tissue, muscle tissue, dermal tissue, vascular tissue, connective tissue, cartilage, tendons, or ligaments. The term “tissue site” may further refer to areas of any tissue that are not necessarily wounded or defective, but are instead areas in which it is desired to add or promote the growth of additional tissue. For example, reduced pressure tissue treatment may be used in certain tissue areas to grow additional tissue that may be harvested and transplanted to another tissue location.

Referring to FIG. 1, a reduced pressure treatment system 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention is provided to deliver a reduced pressure to a tissue site 102 of a patient. The reduced pressure treatment system 100 includes a reduced pressure source 104 fluidly connected by a conduit 108 to a canister 112. The canister 112 is fluidly connected by a conduit 116 to a manifold adapter 120, which is in contact and fluid communication with a distribution manifold 124. Distribution manifold 124 is placed in contact with the tissue site 102. A drape 128 is positioned over the distribution manifold 124 and is preferably sealed to tissue surrounding the perimeter of the tissue site 102. The manifold adapter 120 preferably protrudes through the drape 128, and the drape 128 is sealed to the manifold adapter 120. The drape 128 may be made from an impermeable or semi-permeable material to assist in maintaining reduced pressure at the tissue site 102.

The distribution manifold 124 is primarily responsible for distributing reduced pressure to the tissue site 102, channeling exudates and other fluids away from the tissue site 102, inducing micro-deformation at the tissue site 102, and supporting the drape 128 to create a space in which reduced pressure is maintained. In practice, the distribution manifold 124 is typically an open-cell foam such as a reticulated polyurethane or polyvinyl alcohol foam. The open-cell foam is sized to fit the tissue site 102, placed into contact with the tissue 102, and then periodically replaced with smaller pieces of foam as tissue begins to grow and the tissue site 102 becomes smaller. Frequent replacement of the open-cell foam is necessary to minimize the in-growth of tissue into the cells of the foam. Despite the common use of open-cell foams, many alternative materials may be used as replaceable distribution manifolds, including gauze and any other materials capable of providing distribution characteristics. Similarly, non-replaceable, biocompatible materials may be used as a distribution manifold and then allowed to remain in place at the tissue site 102. In most cases, these biocompatible materials will serve as scaffolds for new tissue growth, and if bioresorbable, will be absorbed by the patient's body during or following treatment.

The reduced pressure treatment system 100 further includes a first sensing device 132 in communication with the tissue site 102 to measure a pressure at the tissue site 102. A second sensing device 136 is in communication with the reduced pressure source 104 to measure a source pressure at the reduced pressure source 104. The first and second sensing devices 132, 136 may be pressure sensors or any other type of sensors capable of determining a pressure of a fluid (i.e. a liquid or a gas). The first and second sensing devices 132, 136 may include processing units (not illustrated) to assist in collecting, interpreting, conditioning, or transmitting data. The physical connection between the sensing devices 132, 136 and the fluid components of the reduced pressure treatment system 100 may vary depending on the type of sensing device 132, 136 that is used. Similarly, the physical location at which each sensing device 132, 136 is connected to the fluid components of the reduced pressure treatment system 100 may vary as long as the desired pressure, or an approximation thereof, is being determined. The first sensing device 132 is illustrated in FIG. 1 as being physically connected to the conduit 116 near the manifold adapter 120. Although this is one possible configuration, in another embodiment, the first sensing device 132 is a pressure sensor and is fluidly connected through a measurement lumen of conduit 116 to the space beneath drape 128. By providing multiple lumens in conduit 116 (at least one for delivery of reduced pressure and at least one for measurement of the tissue site pressure), the first sensing device 132 may be located remotely from the tissue site 102. The first sensing device 132 may be placed in a variety of locations as long as the tissue site pressure determined by the first sensing device 132 substantially approximates the pressure to which the tissue site 102 is exposed.

With respect to the second sensing device 136, the second sensing device 136 may be connected to the conduit 108 (illustrated in FIG. 1) or to the canister 112 to determine the source pressure, which corresponds to the reduced pressure that is output by the reduced pressure source 104. Alternatively, the second sensing device 136 may be placed in communication with an output port of the reduced pressure source 104 to directly measure the amount of vacuum pressure being produced by the reduced pressure source 104.

Referring still to FIG. 1, but also to FIG. 2, the reduced pressure source 104 and the canister 112 may be contained within or mounted on a reduced pressure therapy unit 140. The therapy unit 140 may also contain first and second sensing devices 132, 136, as well as a processing unit 210 that executes software 214. The processing unit 210 may be configured with one or more processors that are the same or different types. For example, the processing unit 210 may include one or more processors, logic, analog components, or any other electronics that enable signals including information, such as fluid pressure at a tissue site, to be received.

The processing unit 210 may further be in communication with (i) a memory 218 for storing data and software code, (ii) an input/output (I/O) unit 222 for communicating with other devices and systems, such as a valves or sensing devices, wirelessly, via a wire, or via a memory input device (not shown), (iii) a storage unit 226 that may store one or more data repositories 228a-228n (collectively 228), such as a database having one or more files, (iv) an electronic display 232 that may or may not be touch-sensitive, and (v) an alarm 236 that is capable of signaling a user of the reduced pressure therapy unit 140 using audio, visual, or other signals. The software 214 may be configured to interface with each of the other devices (e.g., electronic display 232) to allow management and observation of the reduced pressure treatment.

The processing unit 210 is in communication with the first and second sensing devices 132, 136 to control the application of reduced pressure by the reduced pressure source 104. In operation, a target pressure is prescribed (preferably by a doctor or other approved medical personnel) for delivery to the tissue site 102. The target pressure is the “desired” reduced pressure to which the tissue site 102 should be exposed. The desired tissue site pressure will vary from tissue site to tissue site, but will generally be chosen based on the type of tissue making up the tissue site, the type of injury or wound (if any), the medical condition of the patient, and the preference of the attending physician. After selecting the desired tissue site pressure, the reduced pressure source 104 is operated to achieve the desired tissue site pressure at the wound. In many cases, the reduced pressure source 104 will need to be operated at a higher reduced pressure (i.e. lower absolute pressure) than that of the desired tissue site pressure due to pressure losses between the reduced pressure source 104 and the tissue site 102. Moreover, the head pressure of exudates and other fluids within the conduits may result in a reduction of vacuum pressure at the tissue site 102. In FIG. 1, the height, H, of the canister 112 above the tissue site 102 will determine the amount of head pressure imposed on the tissue site 102 by fluid in the conduit 116. For exudates and fluids with a density similar to water, the head pressure imposed by one foot of fluid is almost 25 mm Hg. Some fluids withdrawn from the tissue site may be heavier or more viscous than water, and therefore have a more pronounced effect on pressure losses at the tissue site 102.

As an example of the potential losses caused by the weight of fluid in the conduits, a prescribed target pressure for a particular tissue site may be −125 mm Hg. If the canister 112 is positioned four feet above the tissue site, and if the conduit 116 between the canister 112 and tissue site 102 is completely full of fluid, the head pressure imposed by that fluid could be almost 100 mm Hg. This particular example may be very common if a tissue site is located on a lower extremity of a patient such as a foot and the canister 112 is mounted near or above the patient's head (e.g., on an IV pole when the patient is in a wheelchair). If the head pressure of fluid in the conduit 116 is approximately 100 mm Hg, a source pressure of approximately −225 mm Hg would need to be applied to result in a tissue site pressure of −125 mm Hg.

Another factor that can reduce the tissue site pressure (relative to the source pressure) is a conduit blockage between the tissue site 102 and the reduced pressure source 104. A pressure differential between the pressure supplied by the reduced pressure source 104 (i.e. the source pressure) and the desired tissue site pressure 102 is important to monitor because of the possibility that the pressure differential is at least partially caused by a blockage. If a blockage exists, it is obviously important to clear the blockage as soon as possible. Blockages prevent application of prescribed target pressures, which result in treatment delays and slower healing. On the other hand, attempting to clear a blockage by applying additional pressure to the conduits can be dangerous if the differential pressure across the blockage becomes too great. When a blockage clears in the presence of a high reduced pressure (relative to the tissue site), this high reduced pressure is almost instantaneously communicated to the tissue site. The rapid onset of additional reduced pressure at the tissue site may cause damage to tissues and initiate excessive bleeding.

The reduced pressure treatment system 100 described herein provides protection against harm to the tissue site 102 caused by high negative pressures while providing the ability to overcome high head pressures under normal (no blockage) conditions. The system 100 employs a “dual-zone” approach, in which pressure differentials between the source pressure and the desired tissue site pressure are monitored and then compared to one of two maximum differential pressures depending on whether a blockage is present. More specifically, if a desired tissue site pressure for the tissue site 102 has not been met, the source pressure at the reduced pressure source 104 will be increased and monitored by second sensing device 136. As the source pressure continues to be increased, the differential pressure between the source pressure and the desired tissue site pressure is determined. The differential pressure may be calculated by the processing unit 210 after receiving data from the second sensing device 136. As long as the differential pressure does not exceed the first maximum differential pressure, the reduced pressure treatment system 100 attempts to achieve the desired tissue site pressure at the tissue site 102. The first sensing device 132 continues to monitor the tissue site 102 to determine if the pressure at the tissue site 102 reaches the desired tissue site pressure.

The reduced pressure source is not allowed to continue increasing the source pressure indefinitely. Instead, the source pressure is limited based on the differential pressure between the source pressure and the desired tissue site pressure. In an initial “safe” or “green-zone” operation, the differential pressure will not be allowed to exceed a first maximum differential pressure. It has been found that a sudden clearing of a blockage can result in the source pressure being applied directly to the wound site. It is therefore necessary to limit the absolute source pressure to a safe differential above the desired tissue site pressure. Clinical practice has shown that about 50 mm Hg is a safe amount of differential pressure, and in one embodiment, the first maximum differential pressure is set to about 50 mm Hg. More specifically, for most tissue sites, an instantaneous change of about 50 mm Hg reduced pressure will not cause harm to the tissue site. Under many “blockage” situations, a 50 mm Hg or less differential pressure is sufficient to clear the blockage. However, in the event that a blockage is not cleared by this amount of differential pressure, the reduced pressure treatment system 100 will not allow a further increase in reduced pressure simply to clear the blockage. Instead, the processing unit 210 communicates an alarm condition indicating a blockage to the alarm 236 and continues to apply reduced pressure within the green-zone parameters (i.e. differential pressure not to exceed about 50 mm Hg).

If the differential pressure reaches the first maximum differential pressure (i.e. about 50 mm Hg) and the target pressure still exceeds the tissue site pressure, then a blockage test is performed. When a change in source pressure at the reduced pressure source 104 does not result in a directionally corresponding change in the tissue site pressure, a blockage is present between the tissue site 102 and the reduced pressure source 104. If a directionally corresponding change does occur as the tissue site 102 as indicated by first sensing device 132, then a blockage is not present.

If the blockage test determines that a blockage is not present, and the tissue site pressure does not yet equal the desired tissue site pressure, the source pressure may be safely increased as there is no risk of sudden onset of additional pressure to the tissue site. In this “red-zone” operation, the differential pressure will not be allowed to exceed a second maximum differential pressure. In one embodiment, the second maximum differential pressure is about 100 mm Hg. Red-zone operating parameters are provided for situations when the reduced pressure treatment system 100 has confirmed the absence of blockages between the reduced pressure source 104 and the tissue site 102. This mode of operation may be particularly useful in situations where excessive fluid head pressures at the tissue site cause the tissue site pressure to be much lower than the desired tissue site pressure despite repeated increases in the source pressure.

While it is preferred that the first maximum differential pressure be 50 mm Hg and the second maximum differential pressure be 100 mm Hg, these pressure values could vary depending on the particular tissue site being treated and individual medical considerations. Although the pressure protection system described above is a “dual-zone” system, it should be apparent that a multi-zone system having more than two pressure parameters may be employed to provide additional protections.

Referring to FIG. 3, a method 300 of treating a tissue site according to an embodiment of the present invention includes monitoring a source pressure at a reduced pressure source 304, monitoring a tissue site pressure at a tissue site 308, and determining a differential pressure between the source pressure and the desired tissue site pressure. If a blockage is present between the reduced pressure source and the tissue site, the differential pressure is limited to a first maximum differential pressure at 316. If no blockage is present between the reduced pressure source and the tissue site, the differential pressure is limited to a second maximum differential pressure at 320.

It should be apparent from the foregoing that an invention having significant advantages has been provided. While the invention is shown in only a few of its forms, it is not just limited but is susceptible to various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit thereof.

Claims

1. Apparatus for detecting a blockage between a tissue site and a reduced-pressure source fluidly connected to the tissue site, comprising: a sensing device configured to sense a source pressure (SP) corresponding to pressure provided by the reduced-pressure source and a tissue site pressure (TSP) corresponding to pressure at the tissue site; anda processor coupled to the sensing device and configured to receive the source pressure (SP) and the tissue site pressure (TSP), the processor having a first input adapted to be set to a target pressure (TP) desired for therapy at the tissue site and a second input adapted to be set to a first maximum differential pressure (DP1) above the target pressure (TP), the processor being configured to monitor a differential pressure (DP) being the difference between the source pressure (SP) and the target pressure (TP),determine if the differential pressure (DP) is greater than or equal to the first maximum differential pressure (DP1) when the tissue site pressure (TSP) is less than the target pressure (TP), anddetermine whether a change in the source pressure (SP) results in a blockage between the tissue site and the reduced-pressure source.

2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the processor is configured further to determine whether the change in the source pressure (SP) results in a directionally corresponding change in the tissue site pressure (TSP).

3. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to indicate a blockage is present if (i) the tissue-site pressure (TSP) is less than the target pressure (TP), (ii) the differential pressure (DP) is greater than or equal to the first maximum differential pressure (DP1), and (iii) a change in the source pressure (SP) does not result in a directionally corresponding change in the tissue-site pressure (TSP).

4. The apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the first maximum differential pressure (DP1) is less than or equal to about 50 mm Hg.

5. The apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the processor further comprises an alarm device to alert a user of the presence of a blockage between the reduced pressure source and the tissue site.

6. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to indicate a blockage is not present if (i) the tissue-site pressure (TSP) is less than the target pressure (TP), (ii) the differential pressure (DP) is greater than or equal to the first maximum differential pressure (DP1), and (iii) a change in the source pressure (SP) does result in a directionally corresponding change in the tissue-site pressure (TSP) confirming no blockage between the reduced pressure source and the tissue site.

7. The apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the first maximum differential pressure (DP1) is less than or equal to about 50 mm Hg.

8. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to prevent the source pressure (SP) from increasing further if (i) the tissue-site pressure (TSP) is less than the target pressure (TP), (ii) the differential pressure (DP) is greater than or equal to the first maximum differential pressure (DP1), and (iii) a change in the source pressure (SP) does not result in a directionally corresponding change in the tissue-site pressure (TSP) indicating a blockage between the reduced-pressure source and the tissue site.

9. The apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the first maximum differential pressure (DP1) is less than or equal to about 50 mm Hg.

10. The apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the processor further comprises an alarm device to alert a user of the presence of a blockage between the reduced pressure source and the tissue site.

11. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to allow the source pressure (SP) to increase further if (i) the tissue-site pressure (TSP) is less than the target pressure (TP), (ii) the differential pressure (DP) is greater than or equal to the first maximum differential pressure (DP1), and (iii) a change in the source pressure (SP) does result in a directionally corresponding change in the tissue-site pressure (TSP) indicating no blockage between the reduced pressure source and the tissue site.

12. The apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the first maximum differential pressure (DP1) is less than or equal to about 50 mm Hg.

13. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the processor further comprises a third input adapted to be set as a second maximum differential pressure (DP2) greater than the target pressure (TP).

14. The apparatus according to claim 13, wherein the second maximum differential pressure (DP2) is greater than the first maximum differential pressure (DP1).

15. The apparatus according to claim 13, wherein the first maximum differential pressure (DP1) is less than or equal to about 50 mm Hg.

16. The apparatus according to claim 13, wherein the second maximum differential pressure is less than or equal to about 100 mm Hg.

17. The apparatus according to claim 13, wherein the processor is further configured to prevent the source pressure (SP) from increasing further if the differential pressure (DP) is greater than or equal to the second maximum differential pressure (DP2).

18. The apparatus according to claim 13, wherein the processor further comprises an alarm device to alert a user that the differential pressure (DP) is greater than or equal to the second maximum differential pressure (DP2).

19. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the apparatus further includes a second sensing device.

20. The apparatus according to claim 19, further comprising a canister fluidly connected between the tissue site and the reduced pressure source, and wherein the second sensing device measures the source pressure (SP) at the canister corresponding to pressure provided by the reduced-pressure source.