The present invention relates generally to memory devices, and specifically to methods and devices for reducing errors in data storage and readout.
Several types of memory devices, such as Flash memories and Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), use arrays of analog memory cells for storing data. Flash memory devices are described, for example, by Bez et al., in “Introduction to Flash Memory,” Proceedings of the IEEE 91:4 (April, 2003), pages 489-502, which is incorporated herein by reference. In such memory devices, each analog memory cell typically comprises a transistor, which holds a certain amount of electric charge that represents the information stored in the cell. The electric charge written into a particular cell influences the “threshold voltage” of the cell, i.e., the voltage that needs to be applied to the cell so that the cell will conduct current.
Some memory devices, commonly referred to as Single-Level Cell (SLC) devices, store a single bit of information in each memory cell. Typically, the range of possible threshold voltages of the cell is divided into two regions. A voltage value falling in one of the regions represents a “0” bit value, and a voltage belonging to the second region represents “1”. Higher-density devices, often referred to as Multi-Level Cell (MLC) devices, store more than one bit per memory cell. In multi-level cells, the range of threshold voltages is divided into more than two regions, with each region representing more than one bit.
Multi-level Flash cells and devices are described, for example, by Eitan et al., in “Multilevel Flash Cells and their Trade-Offs,” Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) (New York, N.Y.), pages 169-172, which is incorporated herein by reference. The paper compares several kinds of multilevel Flash cells, such as common ground, DINOR, AND, NOR and NAND cells. Other types of analog memory cells that are known in the art include Nitride Read Only Memory (NROM), Ferroelectric RAM (FRAM), Magnetic RAM (MRAM) and Phase change RAM (PRAM, also referred to as Phase Change Memory—PCM).
In some applications, the data stored in the memory device is encoded using an Error Correcting Code (ECC). For example, Rodney and Sayano describe a number of on-chip coding techniques for the protection of Random Access Memory (RAM) devices, which use multi-level storage cells, in “On-Chip ECC for Multi-Level Random Access Memories,” Proceedings of the 1989 IEEE/CAM Information Theory Workshop (Jun. 25-29, 1989, Ithaca, N.Y.), which is incorporated herein by reference. As another example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,212,654, whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference, describes methods for storing data in an analog memory device using coded modulation techniques. Other ECC schemes for multilevel memory devices are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,469,931 and 7,023,735, whose disclosures are incorporated herein by reference.
The threshold voltage values read from analog memory cells are sometimes distorted. The distortion may be due to various causes, such as electrical field coupling from neighboring memory cells, disturb noise caused by operations on other cells in the array, and threshold voltage drift caused by device aging. Some common distortion mechanisms are described in the article by Bez et al., cited above.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,867,429, whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference, describes a method for compensating for electric field coupling between floating gates of a high-density Flash Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EEPROM) cell array. A reading of a cell is compensated by first reading the states of all cells that are field-coupled with the cell being read. A number related to either the floating gate voltage or the state of each coupled cell is then multiplied by the coupling ratio between the cells. The breakpoint levels between states for each of the cells are adjusted by an amount that compensates for the voltage coupled from adjacent cells.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a method for storing data in an array of analog memory cells. The method includes defining a constellation of voltage levels to be used in storing the data in the analog memory cells, and writing a part of the data to a first analog memory cell in the array by applying to the analog memory cell a first voltage level selected from the constellation. After writing the part of the data to the first analog memory cell, a second voltage level that does not belong to the constellation is read from the first analog memory cell. A modification to be made in writing to one or more of the analog memory cells in the array is determined responsively to the second voltage level. Data are written to the one or more of the analog memory cells subject to the modification.
In some embodiments, determining the modification includes selecting one or more third voltage levels to be written respectively to one or more of the analog memory cells, and writing to the one or more of the analog memory cells includes writing the one or more third voltage levels to the one or more of the analog memory cells.
In a disclosed embodiment, selecting the one or more third voltage levels includes determining a voltage correction to be applied to the first analog memory cell, and writing the one or more third voltage levels includes adding charge to the first analog memory cell so as to apply the voltage correction. Typically, defining the constellation includes defining a matrix of codewords to represent the data, each codeword corresponding to a set of the voltage levels in the constellation that are to be written to a corresponding set of the analog memory cells, and determining the voltage correction includes finding a distance between the set of the voltage levels, including the second voltage level, read from the corresponding set of the analog memory cells and one of the codewords in the matrix, and choosing the voltage correction so as to reduce the distance.
Writing the part of the data may include choosing a first codeword in the matrix to be written to the corresponding set of the analog memory cells, and finding the distance may include determining a first distance between the set of the voltage levels and the first codeword and a second distance between the set of the voltage levels and a second codeword in proximity to the first codeword, whereupon choosing the voltage correction includes computing the voltage correction so as to reduce a ratio of the first distance to the second distance.
Alternatively, the method may include, when the distance exceeds a maximal distance criterion, rewriting the part of the data to the first analog memory cell.
In another embodiment, selecting the one or more third voltage levels includes selecting a third voltage level from the constellation to be written to a second analog memory cell. Typically, selecting the third voltage level includes choosing the third voltage level responsively to both the first voltage level and the second voltage level, while applying feedback coding so as to write multiple successive voltage levels representing the data to a succession of the analog memory cells.
Applying the feedback coding may include choosing the first voltage level responsively to a probability density function (PDF), which relates the data to the voltage levels that are to be used in storing the data in the analog memory cells, and choosing the third voltage level may include updating the PDF responsively to the first and second voltage levels, and choosing the third voltage level responsively to the updated PDF. When the constellation includes 2M voltage levels in each of the analog memory cells, wherein M>1, and choosing the third voltage level may include partitioning the PDF into 2M sub-intervals corresponding to the 2M voltage levels, selecting one of the sub-intervals responsively to a value of the data, and choosing the third voltage level that corresponds to the selected one of the sub-intervals.
Additionally or alternatively, writing the part of the data may include writing respective first voltage levels to a first group of the memory cells in a first row in the array, wherein the second analog memory cell belongs to a second group of the memory cells in a second row of the array, to which the one or more third voltage levels are written after writing to the memory cells in the first row, and wherein each of the memory cells is located in a respective column, and selecting the third voltage level includes determining a respective third voltage level to write to each of the memory cells in the second group responsively to the second voltage level read from one of the first group of the memory cells in the same respective column.
Further additionally or alternatively, writing the part of the data may include simultaneously writing respective first voltage levels to a first group of the memory cells in a first row in the array, wherein the first and second analog memory cells are chosen from among the memory cells in the group responsively to an ordering of the voltage levels to be written to the memory cells.
In some embodiments, the constellation has a first voltage resolution, and reading the second voltage level includes determining the second voltage level with a second voltage resolution that is finer than the first voltage resolution.
Typically, the memory cells are selected from a set of memory cell types consisting of Flash memory cells, Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) cells, Phase Change Memory (PCM) cells, Nitride Read-Only Memory (NROM) cells, and Magnetic Random Access Memory (MRAM) cells.
In a disclosed embodiment, the constellation of the voltage levels includes at least four voltage levels per cell.
In some embodiments, the constellation is modified responsively to the second voltage level. In one embodiment, modifying the constellation includes increasing at least one of the voltage levels to be used in storing the data.
In other embodiments, the modification includes changing a number of error correction bits that are to be added to a word of the data.
There is also provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, apparatus for storing data, including:
a read/write unit, which is coupled to an array of analog memory cells so as to write a part of the data to a first analog memory cell in the array by applying to the analog memory cell a first voltage level selected from a predefined constellation of voltage levels, and which is configured to read from the first analog memory cell, after writing the part of the data thereto, a second voltage level that does not belong to the constellation; and
a signal processing unit, which is configured to determine, responsively to the second voltage level, a modification to be made in writing to one or more of the analog memory cells in the array, and to instruct the read/write unit to write to the one or more of the analog memory cells subject to the modification.
The present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the embodiments thereof, taken together with the drawings in which:
Some analog memory devices use a process of “program and verify” (P&V) in writing information to the memory cells. In a typical P&V process, a cell is programmed by applying a sequence of voltage pulses, whose voltage level increases from pulse to pulse. The programmed voltage level is read (“verified”) after each pulse, and the iterations continue until the desired level is reached. P&V processes are described, for example, by Jung et al., in “A 117 mm2 3.3V Only 128 Mb Multilevel NAND Flash Memory for Mass Storage Applications,” IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits 11:31 (November, 1996), pages 1575-1583, and by Takeuchi et al., in “A Multipage Cell Architecture for High-Speed Programming Multilevel NAND Flash Memories,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 33:8 (August,), pages 1228-1238, which are both incorporated herein by reference.
The embodiments of the present invention that are described hereinbelow improve upon the conventional program-and-verify model by measuring the voltages of analog memory cells against a set of levels that are different from the constellation of levels that correspond to the data values that may be written to the cells. Typically, although not necessarily, the set of levels used in measuring the cell voltages has finer resolution, i.e., is more tightly spaced, than the set of levels in the write constellation. The measured voltage levels may then be used, for example, in providing fine correction to the amount of charge already stored in the cells, or in a feedback coding scheme for determining the voltage levels to be used in writing to subsequent cells in the array.
These fine correction and measurement schemes increase the accuracy of programming the memory and thus reduce the likelihood of data error at readout. Such schemes may thus be used in enhancing memory reliability or, alternatively or additionally, in achieving increased storage density and/or lifetime.
System 20 comprises a memory device 24, which stores data in a memory cell array 28. The memory array comprises multiple analog memory cells 32. In the context of the present patent application and in the claims, the term “analog memory cell” is used to describe any memory cell that holds a continuous, analog value of a physical parameter, such as an electrical voltage or charge. Array 28 may comprise analog memory cells of any kind, such as, for example, NAND or NOR Flash cells, or PCM, NROM, FRAM, MRAM or DRAM cells. The charge levels stored in the cells and/or the analog voltages written into and read out of the cells are referred to herein collectively as analog values.
Data for storage in memory device 24 are provided to the device and cached in data buffers 36. The data are then converted to analog voltages and written into memory cells 32 using a reading/writing (R/W) unit 40, whose functionality is described in greater detail below. When reading data out of array 28, unit 40 converts the electric charge, and thus the analog voltages, of memory cells 32, into digital samples. The samples are cached in buffers 36. The samples produced by unit 40 are referred to as soft samples. The operation and timing of memory device 24 are managed by control logic 48.
Storage and retrieval of data in and out of memory device 24 are performed by a Memory Signal Processor (MSP) 52. MSP 52 intermediates between memory device 24 and memory controller 22 or other host. As will be shown in detail hereinbelow, MSP 52 applies novel methods in determining the analog values that are to be written to memory array 28 in order to improve the reliability and storage density of the data.
MSP 52 comprises an encoder/decoder 64, which typically encodes the data to be written to device 24 using an error correcting code (ECC), and decodes the ECC when reading data out of device 24. A signal processing unit 60 processes the data that are written into and retrieved from device 24. In particular, as data are programmed into cells 32, unit 60 receives digital samples that are indicative of the measured voltage levels of the cells, and then determines further voltage levels to be written (to the same cells and/or other cells) on this basis. Techniques that may be used by unit 60 for this purpose are described in detail hereinbelow with reference to
MSP 52 comprises a data buffer 72, which is used by unit 60 for storing data and for interfacing with memory device 24. MSP 52 also comprises an Input/Output (I/O) buffer 56, which forms an interface between the MSP and the host. A memory management unit 76 manages the operation and timing of MSP 52. Signal processing unit 60 and management unit 76 may be implemented in hardware. Alternatively, unit 60 and/or unit 76 may comprise microprocessors that run suitable software, or a combination of hardware and software elements. Further alternatively, memory controller 22 or even a host processor may be configured to carry out some or all of the functions of the signal processing and management units that are described hereinbelow, as well as other functions of MSP 52.
The configuration of
In the exemplary system configuration shown in
In a typical writing operation, data to be written into memory device 24 are accepted from the host and cached in I/O buffer 56. Encoder/decoder 64 encodes the data, and the encoded data are transferred, via data buffers 72, to memory device 24. In device 24 the data are temporarily stored in buffers 36. R/W unit 40 converts the data to analog voltage values and writes the data (as analog voltage values) into the appropriate cells 32 of array 28. After writing the analog voltage values to a cell or group of cells, R/W unit 40 reads the analog voltage values from the cell(s) and converts the voltages to soft digital samples. The samples are cached in buffers 36 and transferred to buffers 72 of MSP 52. Signal processing unit 60 processes the data samples, using methods that are described hereinbelow, in order to determine data values to be written subsequently by R/W unit.
When data are to be read out of system 20 to controller 22, R/W unit 40 reads the analog voltage values from the appropriate cells and converts these voltage values to digital samples in buffers 36. Blocks of data are transferred from buffers 72 to unit 60, and encoder/decoder 64 decodes the ECC of these blocks. Encoder/decoder 64 may use distortion estimation provided by unit 60 to improve the performance of the ECC decoding process (as described in the above-mentioned PCT patent application). The decoded data are transferred via I/O buffer 56 to the memory controller or host.
Memory cells 32 of array 28 are arranged in a grid having multiple rows and columns. Each cell 32 comprises a floating-gate Metal-Oxide Semiconductor (MOS) transistor. A certain amount of electrical charge (electrons or holes) can be stored in a particular cell by applying appropriate voltage levels to the transistor gate, source and drain. The value stored in the cell can be read by measuring the threshold voltage of the cell, which is defined as the minimal voltage that must be applied to the gate of the transistor in order to cause the transistor to conduct. The read threshold voltage is indicative of the charge stored in the cell.
In the exemplary configuration of
Typically, R/W unit 40 reads the threshold voltage of a particular cell 32 by applying varying voltage levels to its gate (i.e., to the word line to which the cell is connected) and checking whether the drain current of the cell exceeds a certain threshold (i.e., whether the transistor conducts). Unit 40 usually applies a sequence of different voltage values to the word line to which the cell is connected, and determines the lowest gate voltage value for which the drain current exceeds the threshold. Unit 40 then outputs a digital sample to data buffers 36 corresponding to this gate voltage, thus indicating the voltage level of the cell. Typically, unit 40 reads an entire row of cells, also referred to as a page, simultaneously. Alternatively, unit 40 may read cells individually.
In some embodiments, unit 40 measures the drain current by pre-charging the bit line of the cell to a certain voltage level. Once the gate voltage is set to the desired value, the drain current causes the bit line voltage to discharge through the cell. Unit 40 measures the bit line voltage several microseconds after the gate voltage is applied, and compares the bit line voltage to the threshold. In some embodiments, each bit line 84 is connected to a respective sense amplifier (not shown in the figures), which compares the bit line voltage to the threshold using a comparator.
The above method of voltage reading is described solely by way of example. Alternatively, R/W unit 40 may use any other suitable method for reading the threshold voltages of cells 32. For example, unit 40 may comprise one or more Analog to Digital Converters (not shown in the figures), which convert the bit line voltages to digital samples.
In some embodiments, entire pages (rows) are written and read in parallel. Typically, adjacent pages are written in succession, one after another. In alternative embodiments, cells are written sequentially across each row and may likewise be read sequentially.
Although the R/W unit writes a particular nominal voltage level, the actual threshold voltage level of the cell usually deviates from the nominal level, because of distortion mechanisms and other nonuniformities. Curves 92A . . . 92D show an exemplary voltage distribution created during the initial program stage of a program-and-verify procedure. Curve 92A shows the distribution of voltages in the cells that store “11” bit values. Curves 92B, 92C and 92D show the voltage distribution in the cells that store “01”, “00” and “10” bit values, respectively.
For purposes of verification, a different set of voltage levels is used—in this case a set of levels with finer resolution than the constellation of write voltages represented by levels 90A . . . 90D. The total range of threshold voltages is divided in this example into sixteen intervals 96 by defining fifteen read thresholds 94. Thus, R/W unit 40 reads the threshold voltage levels of the memory cells using four-bit conversion, depending on the decision interval in which the threshold level read from the cell falls. MSP 52 uses this readout in determining voltages to be written to array 28 subsequently, as described in detail hereinbelow. The particular read thresholds and intervals shown in
As explained above, the actual voltage values read from cells 32 in array 28 typically spread over a range of values around the nominal values represented by constellation points 150. Thus, in the example shown in
In order to reduce the effect of this sort of error, R/W unit 40 reads out the voltage levels V1 and V2 in the verify stage with resolution that is finer than the nominal resolution of the constellation, as illustrated by thresholds 94 and intervals 96 in
The signal processing unit finds the location of initial point 152 corresponding to this set of voltage readout values in the m-dimensional constellation space, and calculates the distance of the initial point from the target constellation point, at a distance computation step 164. Any suitable distance measure, such as the Euclidean (sum of squares) distance, may be used at this step. The signal processing unit may also find the distances from the initial point to other nearby constellation points. Referring to the example shown in
Signal processing unit 60 compares the distance from the initial point to target point 150a with the distances to other constellation points, at a distance checking step 166. For example, the signal processing unit may find the ratio of these distances. If the ratio is smaller than a predefined threshold, for example, less than ½, then the signal processing unit may conclude that the present codeword has been written correctly, and may proceed to the next block of cells. Alternatively or additionally, another threshold may be defined such that if the distance from the initial point to target 150a is smaller than then threshold, then the signal processing unit concludes that the present codeword has been written correctly, without reference to the ratio.
If the ratio is too large, however, the signal processing unit checks whether it is possible to improve the ratio by correcting the voltage in one or more of the cells in the present block, at a correction checking step 168. Typically, the signal processing unit determines whether, by adding charge to one or more of the cells, it will be possible to decrease the ratio, i.e. to bring the set of cell voltages closer to the target constellation point without reducing substantially the distances to other constellation points. In the example shown in
Alternatively, signal processing unit 60 may conclude at step 168 that it is not possible to correct the initial point written at step 160. The reason may be that the initial point is too far from the target point to be effectively corrected by addition of charge to the cells, or that attempting to correct the voltage will bring the point too close to an incorrect constellation point, or that charge must be removed from one or more of the cells (which is not possible without erasure of the cells). In this case, the signal processing unit may instruct R/W unit 40 to rewrite the entire block. Optionally, the codeword may be revised before writing to contain a greater number of bits, by adding parity bits, for example (or the number of data bits encoded by the codeword may be reduced), thereby effectively spacing constellation points 150 farther apart in the constellation space. Increasing the size of the codeword in this manner effectively reduces the information capacity of the block in question. Methods for adapting information storage to the achievable capacity of memory cells in an array are described further, for example, in a PCT patent application entitled “Memory Device with Adaptive Capacity,” filed on even date, which is assigned to the assignee of the present patent application and whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.
The R/W unit then returns to verify the rewritten block at step 162, and the process of verification and possible correction is repeated, as described above. If the signal processing unit returns to step 168 and again finds the point written at step 172 to be too far from the target point, it may mark the current block in array 28 as a bad block, and then proceed to rewrite the current codeword to another block in the array.
The addition of charge to target cells at step 170 is useful when the cell voltage is found at step 164 to be lower than that of the target point. Alternatively, in some cases, such as when the measured cell voltage is above that of the target point, MSP 52 may decide to modify the constellation, typically by increasing the voltage levels of the constellation. (A drawback of this approach is that the use of higher programming voltages may cause a high level of wear to the memory cells.) The MSP may add to the data an indication that the constellation levels have been increased, by setting a flag, for example.
Although the method of
The method of
For the sake of the feedback coding scheme, the sequence of bits that is to be written to a sequential group of cells is represented as a “floating point” number x, wherein 0≦x<1. In other words, the information bits to be stored in the array are the bits in the binary 2's complement representation of x, normalized to the range 0≦x<1, starting from the most significant bit (MSB) and moving sequentially to the right. Signal processing unit 60 determines the voltage value to be written to each cell by applying a probability distribution function (PDF) to the bits in x, at a voltage computation step 182. For purposes of computing the PDF in the simplified method that follows, array 28 is assumed to behave as a binary symmetric channel (BSC), meaning that each bit is written correctly to a cell in the array with probability 1−p, or incorrectly with error probability p. Before writing the first bit, the PDF is uniform over the interval [0,1). Alternatively, the method may be adapted to use other representations of error probability and PDF, such as a Gaussian representation.
In the first iteration through step 182, using the initial PDF, signal processing unit 60 instructs R/W unit 40 to write the voltage value corresponding to “1” to the first cell in the block in question if x>0.5 and “0” otherwise. The R/W unit writes this value to the first cell, at a writing step 184. It then reads out the voltage value that is actually recorded in the cell, at a reading step 186. As noted above, the R/W unit typically reads out the voltage value with higher resolution than the binary constellation of write levels.
The signal processing unit updates the PDF based on the voltage value read from the cell, at a PDF update step 188. After the first iteration through step 188, the PDF will be piecewise-constant with two levels, according whether the voltage read from the cell was above or below the nominal threshold voltage between the “1” and “0” voltage values. For example, if the voltage read from the cell corresponds to “1”, the signal processing unit will set the PDF to equal 2(1−p) for 0.5<x<1 and 2p for 0<x<0.5. (In contrast to the method of
At the next iteration through step 182, to determine the voltage value to be written to the next cell, signal processing unit 60 calculates the median point of the PDF (i.e., the point m for which the probability that x<m is 0.5), in accordance with the latest update of the PDF at step 188. The signal processing unit instructs R/W unit 40 to write a voltage value corresponding to “1” to the next cell if x is larger than the median, and “0” otherwise. The voltage values that are chosen for writing to the cells are thus based both on the values of data bits that are to be stored in the memory and on the values of the voltages that are actually written to the memory.
After programming and reading the appropriate voltage value at steps 184 and 186, the signal processing unit again updates the PDF at step 188. At this iteration, the signal processing unit divides the PDF into three intervals, by splitting either the lower interval (0<x<0.5) or the upper interval (0.5<x<1) at the median point found at step 182. It then multiplies the PDF in either the interval above the median or the interval below the median by (1−p), depending on whether the voltage read out of the current cell corresponds to “1” or “0”, and multiplies the PDF by p in the other interval. The resulting PDF is then normalized (multiplied by a constant) so that its integral from 0 to 1 will be 1. The PDF will now be piecewise-constant with three levels.
This process continues iteratively, wherein at each pass through step 182, signal processing unit 60 outputs the voltage value corresponding to “1” if x is larger than the current median of the PDF, and “0” otherwise. Over many iterations, the PDF gradually takes the shape of an impulse response at x. The amplitude of the impulse, relative to the baseline PDF (corresponding to other data words), is indicative of the probability of error when the data are read out of array 28. When the probability falls below a predetermined threshold, the iteration terminates.
Errors in writing data to array 28 (i.e., discrepancies between the voltage values read at step 186 and those written at step 184) will delay the buildup of the impulse, but the impulse will eventually build up as long as there are no errors in readout at step 186. It can be shown that under these conditions, this feedback-based coding scheme causes information to be stored in array 28 at a density approaching the theoretical capacity, and also attains the theoretical limit for coding delay. In practice, this method may be combined with other techniques for correcting read errors that may occur in readout of data from array 28.
The method described above may be generalized for use in multi-level memory cells, which store M bits per cell. In this case, each cell has 2M possible input and output levels, with a probability P(i,j) that a level i that is output by signal processing unit 60 will be written to a memory cell as level j. Instead of calculating the median of the PDF at step 182, the signal processing unit finds the 2M−1 points that partition the interval [0,1) into 2M equiprobable sub-intervals. For each successive cell, the signal processing unit then instructs R/W unit 40 to write the voltage value corresponding to the interval that contains x. The signal processing unit builds up the PDF at step 188 in the same manner, as a piecewise-constant function (but with more sub-intervals than for the binary case).
Although the method described above depends on sequential coding and writing of bits to successive cells, it may be adapted for use in devices, such as Flash memories, in which R/W unit 40 writes data to a group of cells, such as a page (i.e., a row), simultaneously. For this purpose, MSP 52 may code a sequence of words of data that are to be written to successive pages. Since each word is to be written to a corresponding page, it contains one respective symbol to be written to each cell in the page, i.e., one symbol per column. The MSP extracts the symbols in each column of the sequence of words and arranges these symbols in succession so as to define a respective number x for that column, which is then used in determining the values to be written to cells 32 on the corresponding bit line 84. In other words, the symbols in the first column are extracted and arranged in order to define a first word, which is written to the cells on the first bit line, and so forth. The signal processing unit then determines and updates the respective PDF for each bit line of array 28, and uses this specific PDF in determining the voltage value to be written on the corresponding bit line in each page that it sends to R/W unit 40.
It is not necessary that all the symbols that are to go into a respective number x for purposes of feedback coding be known in advance. Rather, the signal processing unit may begin the coding process of
As another alternative, MSP 52 may take advantage of the way in which many Flash memories write data to cells 32 on a common word line 80 in order to perform feedback coding of data within each page. As noted above, in the course of writing a given page, R/W unit 40 applies pulses of gradually increasing voltage on the corresponding word line. When the voltage reaches the level to which a given cell in that page is to be charged, the R/W unit switches the corresponding bit line to stop the charging of that cell. Thus, writing to different cells in the same page will be completed at different times, depending on the respective voltage values that are to be written to the cells. In order to code the values, the signal processing unit arranges them in order of increasing value, which will typically differ from the order of the corresponding cells in the page. The method described above may then be applied, mutatis mutandis.
Alternatively or additionally, feedback techniques may be applied in determining the number of ECC (parity) bits to be used in encoding data. For example, after data have been written to a first group of memory cells, and R/W unit 40 has read out the voltage values from these memory cells, MSP 52 may process these voltage values in order to decide how many ECC parity bits are required to ensure the reliability of the programmed data. ECC encoder 64 than calculates these parity bits for subsequent data, and in the resultant codewords are written to a second group of memory cells. Techniques of this sort for adaptive capacity adjustment are described further in the above-mentioned PCT patent application entitled “Memory Device with Adaptive Capacity.”
Although the embodiments described above relate, for the sake of clarity, to the specific device architecture and features shown in
It will thus be appreciated that the embodiments described above are cited by way of example, and that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description and which are not disclosed in the prior art.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/747,106, filed May 12, 2006; U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/821,764, filed Aug. 8, 2006; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/863,810, filed Nov. 1, 2006; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/867,401, filed Nov. 28, 2006. All of these related applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL2007/000575 | 5/10/2007 | WO | 00 | 1/15/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/132452 | 11/22/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4556961 | Iwahashi et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4558431 | Satoh | Dec 1985 | A |
4661929 | Aoki et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4768171 | Tada | Aug 1988 | A |
4811285 | Walker et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4899342 | Potter et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4910706 | Hyatt | Mar 1990 | A |
4993029 | Galbraith et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5056089 | Furuta et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5172338 | Mehrotta et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5191584 | Anderson | Mar 1993 | A |
5200959 | Gross et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5237535 | Mielke et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5272669 | Samachisa et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5388064 | Khan | Feb 1995 | A |
5416782 | Wells et al. | May 1995 | A |
5473753 | Wells et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479170 | Cauwenberghs et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5508958 | Fazio et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5519831 | Holzhammer | May 1996 | A |
5541886 | Hasbun | Jul 1996 | A |
5600677 | Citta et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5657332 | Auclair et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5675540 | Roohparvar | Oct 1997 | A |
5696717 | Koh | Dec 1997 | A |
5726649 | Tamaru et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742752 | De Koning | Apr 1998 | A |
5751637 | Chen et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761402 | Kaneda et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5801985 | Roohparvar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5838832 | Barnsley | Nov 1998 | A |
5860106 | Domen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867429 | Chen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877986 | Harari et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5901089 | Korsh et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909449 | So et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5912906 | Wu et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5930167 | Lee et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5942004 | Cappelletti | Aug 1999 | A |
5991517 | Harari et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6009014 | Hollmer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6034891 | Norman | Mar 2000 | A |
6040993 | Chen et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041430 | Yamauchi | Mar 2000 | A |
6073204 | Lakhani et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6101614 | Gonzales et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128237 | Shirley et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134140 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134143 | Norman | Oct 2000 | A |
6134631 | Jennings | Oct 2000 | A |
6141261 | Patti | Oct 2000 | A |
6166962 | Chen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6185134 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209113 | Roohparvar | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212654 | Lou et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219276 | Parker | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219447 | Lee et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222762 | Guterman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230233 | Lofgren et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6275419 | Guterman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279069 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288944 | Kawamura | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292394 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301151 | Engh et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304486 | Yano | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307776 | So et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317363 | Guterman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317364 | Guterman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6363008 | Wong | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363454 | Lakhani et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6396742 | Korsh et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397364 | Barkan | May 2002 | B1 |
6405323 | Lin et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6442585 | Dean et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456528 | Chen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466476 | Wong et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467062 | Barkan | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469931 | Ban et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6522580 | Chen et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6525952 | Araki et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6532556 | Wong et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538922 | Khalid et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6558967 | Wong | May 2003 | B1 |
6560152 | Cernea | May 2003 | B1 |
6577539 | Iwahashi | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584012 | Banks | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6615307 | Roohparvar | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621739 | Gonzalez et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6643169 | Rudelic et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6678192 | Gongwer et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6687155 | Nagasue | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6707748 | Lin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708257 | Bao | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717847 | Chen | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6731557 | Beretta | May 2004 | B2 |
6738293 | Iwahashi | May 2004 | B1 |
6751766 | Guterman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757193 | Chen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6781877 | Cernea et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6807095 | Chen et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6829167 | Tu et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6845052 | Ho et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6851018 | Wyatt et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856546 | Guterman et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862218 | Guterman et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870767 | Rudelic et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6894926 | Guterman et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6907497 | Hosono et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6963505 | Cohen | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6972993 | Conley et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6988175 | Lasser | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6992932 | Cohen | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7002843 | Guterman et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7012835 | Gonzalez et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020017 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023735 | Ban et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031210 | Park et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031214 | Tran | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031216 | You | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7054193 | Wong | May 2006 | B1 |
7057958 | So et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065147 | Ophir et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068539 | Guterman et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7079555 | Baydar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7088615 | Guterman et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099194 | Tu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7102924 | Chen et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113432 | Mokhlesi | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7130210 | Bathul et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7139192 | Wong | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7139198 | Guterman et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7170802 | Cernea et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173859 | Hemink | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7177184 | Chen | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7177195 | Gonzales et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7177199 | Chen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7177200 | Ronen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187195 | Kim | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7187592 | Guterman et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7193898 | Cernea | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7193921 | Choi et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7196928 | Chen | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197594 | Raz et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200062 | Kinsely et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7221592 | Nazarian | May 2007 | B2 |
7224613 | Chen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7231474 | Helms et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7243275 | Gongwer et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7254690 | Rao | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7257027 | Park | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259987 | Chen et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266026 | Gongwer et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7274611 | Roohparvar | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277355 | Tanzawa | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7280398 | Lee at al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7289344 | Chen | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7301807 | Khalid et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308525 | Lasser et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310255 | Chan | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310272 | Mokhlesi et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7321509 | Chen et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7342831 | Mokhlesi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7345928 | Li | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349263 | Kim et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7356755 | Fackenthal | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363420 | Lin et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7397697 | So et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7408804 | Hemink et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7409473 | Conley et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7420847 | Li | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433231 | Aritome | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7437498 | Ronen | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7441067 | Gorobetz et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7453737 | Ha | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7468911 | Lutze et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471581 | Tran et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7508710 | Mokhlesi | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7570520 | Kamei et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7593259 | Kim | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20010006479 | Ikehashi et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020118574 | Gongwer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020174295 | Ulrich et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020196510 | Hietala et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002348 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030103400 | Tran | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030161183 | Tran | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030189856 | Cho et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040057265 | Mirabel et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040057285 | Cernea et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040083333 | Chang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083334 | Chang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040105311 | Cernea et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040114437 | Li | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040160842 | Fukiage | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050007802 | Gerpheide | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013165 | Ban | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024941 | Lasser et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050024978 | Ronen | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050086574 | Fackenthal | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050121436 | Kamitani et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162913 | Chen | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169051 | Khalid et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050189649 | Maruyama et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213393 | Lasser | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050224853 | Ohkawa | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240745 | Iyer et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243626 | Ronen | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004952 | Lasser | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060028875 | Avraham et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060028877 | Meir | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060101193 | Murin | May 2006 | A1 |
20060107136 | Gongwer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129750 | Lee et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133141 | Gorobets | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156189 | Tomlin | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060179334 | Brittain et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060203546 | Lasser | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218359 | Sanders et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221705 | Hemink et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239077 | Park et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060256620 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256626 | Werner et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256891 | Yuan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271748 | Jain et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285392 | Incarnati et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060285396 | Ha | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070006013 | Moshayedi et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019481 | Park | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070033581 | Tomlin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047314 | Goda et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070047326 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050536 | Kolokowsky | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058446 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061502 | Lasser et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067667 | Ikeuchi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074093 | Lasser | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070086239 | Litsyn et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086260 | Sinclair | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070089034 | Litsyn et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091677 | Lasser et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091694 | Lee et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103978 | Conley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070103986 | Chen | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109845 | Chen | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109849 | Chen | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118713 | Guterman et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070143378 | Gorobetz | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143531 | Atri | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159889 | Kang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070159892 | Kang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070159907 | Kwak | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168837 | Murin | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171714 | Wu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183210 | Choi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189073 | Aritome | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206426 | Mokhlesi | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070208904 | Hsieh et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226599 | Motwani | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070236990 | Aritome | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253249 | Kang et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070256620 | Viggiano et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266232 | Rodgers et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271424 | Lee et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280000 | Fujiu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080010395 | Mylly et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025121 | Tanzawa | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080043535 | Roohparvar | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049504 | Kasahara et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049506 | Guterman | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055993 | Lee | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080243 | Edahiro et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082730 | Kim et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104309 | Cheon et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109590 | Jung et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080115017 | Jacobson | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123420 | Brandman et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126686 | Sokolov et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130341 | Shalvi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148115 | Sokolov et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158958 | Sokolov et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181001 | Shalvi | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198650 | Shalvi et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209304 | Winarski et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215798 | Sharon et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219050 | Shalvi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080239812 | Abiko et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263262 | Sokolov et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080282106 | Shalvi et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090024905 | Shalvi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043831 | Antonopoulos et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043951 | Shalvi et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049234 | Oh et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090089484 | Chu | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090091979 | Shalvi | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106485 | Anholt | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090144600 | Perlmutter et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090172257 | Prins et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090172261 | Prins et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204824 | Lin et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225595 | Kim | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0783754 | Jul 1997 | EP |
1434236 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1605509 | Dec 2005 | EP |
9610256 | Apr 1996 | WO |
9828745 | Jul 1998 | WO |
2007046084 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007132452 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007132453 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007132456 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007132457 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007132458 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007146010 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008026203 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008053472 | May 2008 | WO |
2008053473 | May 2008 | WO |
2008068747 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008077284 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008083131 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008099958 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008111058 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008124760 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008139441 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2009037691 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009050703 | Apr 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090103358 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60747106 | May 2006 | US | |
60821764 | Aug 2006 | US | |
60863810 | Nov 2006 | US |