Reflow chamber and process

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6299689
  • Patent Number
    6,299,689
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 13, 2000
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 9, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A method and apparatus for reflowing a material layer is provided. The inventive method introduces into a reflow chamber a material which is at least as reactive or more reactive than a material to be reflowed (i.e., a gettering material). Preferably the gettering material is sputter deposited within the reflow chamber while a shield prevents the gettering material from reaching the material layer to be reflowed. The shield may be coupled to, or integral with a clamp for clamping a wafer (containing the material layer to be reflowed) to a wafer support provided sufficient venting exists so that contaminants degassed from the wafer may flow to the region between the sputtering target and the shield where the contaminants can react with gettering material. The shield may have a roughened top surface (the surface that faces the sputtering target) which deters gettering material from flaking off the shield and/or the shield may have a reflective bottom surface (the surface that faces the wafer) that reflects heat to the wafer.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Thin film deposition is essential to the manufacture of solid state electronic devices. By layering various materials (i.e., films) on a wafer in a prescribed pattern, a solid state electronic device is formed.




Within the semiconductor device industry there is an ever present trend for more complex multi-layer structures and smaller device dimensions. In order to reduce the lateral device area of storage capacitors, for example, high aspect ratio (i.e., high depth to width ratio) features (e.g., steps, trenches and vias) have become prevalent. Such features possess large side wall surface areas which allow lateral device dimensions to shrink while maintaining constant capacitor area (and thus a constant capacitance).




When depositing a film over a high aspect ratio feature, material tends to deposit near the top surface (i.e. the surface nearest the deposition material source or target) of the feature and to prevent subsequently deposited material from reaching the feature's lower surfaces, causing variations in deposition layer thickness including voids (areas containing no deposition material). Accordingly, much attention has been directed to formation of continuous conformal films within high aspect ratio features, and/or to continuous filling of high aspect ratio features (e.g., aluminum planarization).




As described in “Aluminum Planarization for Advanced Via Applications,”


European Semiconductor


, February 1996, a preferred technique for achieving aluminum planarization is known as the high temperature flow process (i.e., reflow). Aluminum reflow typically begins with deposition of a thick film of aluminum that is deposited on a wafer at relatively low wafer temperatures (e.g., less than 150° C.). The wafer is then transferred to a reflow chamber and heated to a temperature at which the aluminum film flows (i.e., a reflow temperature). A temperature of 570° C. is conventionally required to supply aluminum with sufficient energy to cause the aluminum to flow. At this temperature solid phase diffusion and surface tension transport aluminum across the wafer's surface, and transport aluminum from the top region of surface features to the bottom of surface features (i.e., top down filling).




Although conventional reflow methods can produce adequate filling of many types of surface features, reflow is unfeasible for small feature applications. Thus, for small feature applications a more costly and time consuming process known as cold/hot sequential deposition (having wafer temperatures in the range of 430-475° C.) must be employed.




Moreover, both conventional reflow and cold/hot sequential deposition processes experience degraded film properties caused by contaminants (water vapor, O


2


, etc.) which desorb from chamber surfaces, from process kit parts, or from the wafer itself during the planarization process. These contaminants enter the chamber atmosphere and are pumped therefrom. Over time fewer contaminants desorb, however, water is often the last contaminant to desorb, and can break into hydrogen and oxygen. Free oxygen is highly reactive and tends to bond with the film (e.g., aluminum) causing the film to surface passivate (e.g., tying up dangling bonds and reducing the surface energy of the film). Surface passivation degrades the film's ability to flow (i.e., degrades surface mobility), thus encouraging void formation. In addition to degrading surface mobility of the film, oxygen and hydrogen, because they have very low atomic weights, are extremely difficult to pump from the chamber. These contaminants remain in the chamber, producing an increase in chamber base pressure which causes the film to have poor crystal orientation and film purity. The poor crystal orientation and film purity result in resistivity and reflectivity deterioration. Thus contaminants which desorb from processed wafers can increase chamber base pressure, and consequently, cause incomplete feature filling due to decreased surface mobility.




Accordingly, a need exists for an expeditious and cost effective method and apparatus for planarizing films at relatively low temperatures, and for a method which resists the adverse affects of desorbed contaminants.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides an improved reflow method and apparatus that significantly improves film quality, and reduces chamber downtime. Specifically, the inventive reflow process comprises introducing, into a reflow chamber, a material which is at least as reactive as the material of the film to be reflowed (i.e., the reflow material). For convenience a material that is at least as reactive as the reflow material is referred to herein as a gettering material.




Preferably the gettering material is sputter deposited while an object (e.g., a wafer) having a reflow material film thereon is shielded from gettering material deposition. The reflow material film is heated and reflows at a lower temperature (as compared to conventional reflow temperatures) because the surface mobility of the film is not degraded since desorbed contaminants react with the gettering material (which deposits on chamber surfaces, on process kit parts, and/or is present in the chamber's atmosphere), rather than reacting with the reflow material film. Preferably sputtering of the gettering material occurs during film heating and before contaminant desorption. However, gettering material may be deposited at anytime during the reflow process as long as it does not interfere with the deposited film being reflowed and/or, alternatively may be deposited on the chamber surfaces and on the process kit parts prior to introducing the wafer to the chamber.




Contaminants which desorb from the wafer, the film, the process kit parts and/or from chamber surfaces tend to react with the gettering material rather than with the reflow material for the following reasons:




1) because the surface area of gettering material within the chamber (e.g., chamber and process kit part surfaces coated with gettering material) is much greater than the surface area of the reflow material film;




2) because the gettering material present in the chamber's atmosphere is in a more energetic state (e.g., a plasma state) and is therefore more likely to react than the solid phase reflow material;




and/or




3) because the gettering material (e.g., titanium) whether in a solid, liquid or gas phase is preferably more reactive than the reflow material (e.g., aluminum).




Thus with use of the present invention the film absorbs fewer, if any, contaminants. Film reflow is more effective and superior surface feature filling is achieved. Because contaminants react with the gettering material rather than remaining in the chamber's atmosphere, the inventive reflow chamber experiences a lower rate of rise in pressure during reflow than do conventional reflow chambers. A lower chamber pressure is therefore maintained during the inventive reflow process and causes the reflowed film to exhibit improved characteristics as compared to conventionally reflowed films (e.g., smoother surface, greater wafer to wafer sheet resistance/surface resistivity uniformity, etc.).




Finally, following an idle period, a chamber that employs the inventive reflow process can be pumped down from sputtering pressure to its base pressure faster (e.g., in as little as two minutes, depending on the pump rate) than chamber's that employ conventional reflow processes. Faster pump down is possible because the gettering material deposited on the process kit parts and on the chamber's surfaces absorbs airborne contaminants, reducing the number of airborne contaminants that need to be pumped from the chamber's atmosphere in order to return the chamber to its base pressure. Additionally, gettering material in the chamber's atmosphere reacts with airborne contaminants to produce larger molecules which are more easily pumped from the chamber. In fact, following an idle period the inventive reflow process reduces downtime by more than an order of magnitude, allowing significant throughput increases as compared to conventional reflow methods. Additional throughput increases are achieved as fewer chamber cleanings and fewer cryopump regenerations are required because contaminants are absorbed by the gettering material rather than filling the cryopump.




An inventive reflow chamber for performing the above described method comprises a source of gettering material (e.g., a target of aluminum, titanium, etc., assuming an aluminum reflow material), and a shield that blocks the gettering material from depositing on a wafer positioned within the reflow chamber. Preferably the shield is coupled or is integral to a reflector that reflects heat to the wafer. The shield may also be coupled or integral to a wafer clamping mechanism (e.g., a clamp ring or clamping fingers, etc.) provided sufficient venting exists so that degassed contaminants can flow from the wafer into the chamber's atmosphere where they can react with gettering material. Preferably the shield has a roughened top surface to deter flaking of the gettering material.




Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, the appended claims and the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic side elevational view of an inventive reflow chamber;





FIGS. 2A and 2B

are a side elevational view and a bottom plan view, respectively, of a shield which is integral to a ring shaped clamp; and





FIG. 3

is a flow diagram outlining a preferred method of operation for the inventive reflow chamber of FIG.


1


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS





FIG. 1

is a schematic side elevational view of an inventive reflow chamber


11


. The inventive reflow chamber


11


comprises an enclosure wall


13


, which encloses a source of gettering material such as a target


15


mounted in the upper region of the reflow chamber


11


. A gas inlet


17


supplies gas to the reflow chamber


11


for sputtering the target


15


(as described below), and an exhaust outlet


19


, coupled to an exhaust pump such as a cryopump


21


, pumps gas from the reflow chamber


11


. Objects to be processed are placed on an object location (for example, on a wafer support


23


) positioned below the target


15


. The wafer support


23


contains a heater


25


for heating an object placed thereon.




As shown in

FIG. 1

a wafer


27


is positioned on the wafer support


23


and is clamped in place by a clamp


29


which is operatively coupled to the wafer support


23


. In the embodiment of

FIG. 1

, a shield


31


is coupled to the clamp


29


. The shield


31


has a first surface which is preferably reflective (i.e., a reflective surface


33




a


), and a second surface which is preferably rough (i.e., a rough surface


33




b


). The shield


31


is coupled to the clamp


29


such that the reflective surface


33




a


faces the wafer


27


and such that the rough surface


33




b


faces the target


15


. In this manner, radiative heat which emits from the wafer support


23


reflects off the reflective surface


33




a


back to the wafer


27


positioned on the wafer support


23


, heated gas molecules rising from the wafer


27


are pumped away from the region between the shield


31


and the wafer


27


and gettering material sputtered from the target


15


which deposits on the rough surface


33




b


adheres thereto. Due to the rough texture of the surface


33




b


,the surface area on which gettering material may deposit is increased and gettering material that deposits on the rough surface


33




b


is less likely to crumble therefrom.




The clamp


29


may comprise any conventional clamping mechanism, for example, a ring shaped clamp or a plurality of clamping fingers, provided sufficient venting allows gasses/contaminants which desorb from the wafer


27


to flow into the region between the target


15


and the shield


31


, where the gasses/contaminants may react with gettering material.





FIGS. 2A and 2B

show a side elevational view and a bottom plan view, respectively, of a shield


31


which is integral to a ring shaped clamp


29


.

FIG. 2A

shows the clamp


29


clamping a wafer


27


. A region


35


is enclosed by the shield


31


, the clamp


29


, and the wafer


27


.

FIG. 2B

shows six grooves


37




a-f


in the bottom surface of the clamp


29


which form channels for venting desorbed contaminants from the region


35


to a region between the shield


31


and the target


15


(FIG.


1


).





FIG. 3

is a flow diagram useful in describing an example of the inventive reflow process. The exemplary process of

FIG. 3

is described in conjunction with the apparatus of FIG.


1


. As indicated by block


1


, the wafer


27


is placed in the inventive reflow chamber


11


and the clamp


29


, which is coupled to the shield


31


, clamps the wafer


27


to the wafer support


23


.




Thereafter, as represented by block


2


, argon is flowed into the inventive reflow chamber


11


through the gas inlet


17


(i.e., process argon). Argon is also flowed to the region between the wafer


27


and the wafer support


23


for the purpose of conducting heat therebetween (i.e., heater argon). The heater argon flow rate is selected so that in conjunction with the heater


25


and the reflective surface


33




a


, the wafer


27


is heated to the reflow temperature.




A significant advantage of the inventive reflow process is the ability to reflow material at temperatures lower than the temperatures conventionally required for reflow. For example, for the same reflow time (e.g., 90 seconds), the present invention reflows aluminum at a heater temperature of 550° C., a significantly lower temperature than the 570° C. heater temperature required of conventional reflow methods. Reflow occurs at lower temperatures with use of the inventive reflow method because fewer contaminants react with and passivate the reflow material. Absent the inventive process, the passivating contaminants inhibit the mobility of the reflow material so that additional thermal energy must be imparted to the reflow material to achieve the required surface mobility for surface feature filling.




Assuming the material to be reflowed is aluminum, a heater temperature of 550° C., and a heater argon flow rate of 33 s.c.c. heats the wafer


27


to the 500° C. reflow temperature after 10 to 15 seconds. Prior to reaching the reflow temperature, the pressure in the reflow chamber


11


stabilizes. The temperature of the wafer and the chamber does not reach a temperature at which degassing begins until after ten seconds. Accordingly after approximately ten seconds (prior to degassing) the process proceeds to block


3


.




As represented by block


3


, a fresh layer of gettering material is deposited within the reflow chamber


11


by applying 1000 Watts of D.C. power to the target


15


(e.g., at a ramp rate of 500 Watts/sec). After approximately ten seconds a gettering material thickness sufficient to absorb any degassed contaminants (e.g., 60 angstroms) is deposited on the process kit parts and on chamber surfaces. Thereafter, to cease gettering material deposition the process argon and D.C. target power are turned off, as represented by block


4


.




During the deposition of the gettering material, the heater power and heater argon flow remain constant such that the wafer


27


continues to heat toward the 500° C. reflow temperature. After the wafer


27


reaches the reflow temperature, the heater power and heater argon flow continue to remain constant so that the wafer


27


is maintained at the 500° C. reflow temperature. Heat radiating from the wafer


27


strikes the reflective surface


33




a


and reflects back to the wafer


27


. In this manner a uniform temperature is maintained across the surface of the wafer


27


causing more uniform flow of the aluminum film across the wafer's surface and more uniform filling of surface features.




Contaminants degassed from the wafer


27


, from the process kit parts and from chamber surfaces, react with the gettering material rather than with the reflow material film. Accordingly the reflow material film flows more readily at lower temperatures because the film's surface mobility is not reduced by contaminants that cause the film to surface passivate. Preferably the gettering material (e.g., titanium) is more reactive than the reflow material (e.g., aluminum). The use of titanium as the gettering material is particularly advantageous because titanium is highly soluble to contaminants (e.g., O


2


) . A layer of titanium absorbs contaminants until the entire depth of the titanium layer is contaminated (e.g., passivated). Thus, a thin layer of titanium can absorb a relatively large amount of contaminants. Accordingly, in addition to providing improved filling of surface features, the inventive reflow method is cost effective as titanium is inexpensive and is required only in small quantities.




As indicated by block


4


, for an aluminum reflow material the 550° C. heater temperature is maintained for a time sufficient to allow the aluminum film to fill surface features on the wafer


27


. Assuming 0.5 μm sized surface features, an 5000 angstrom aluminum film sufficiently reflows after approximately 80 seconds at a wafer temperature of 500° C.




Due to the large surface area of gettering material on the process kit parts and on chamber surfaces, the amount of gettering material in the chamber's atmosphere and/or the gettering material's permeability, a 60 angstrom gettering material layer sufficiently absorbs desorbed contaminants and no additional gettering material need be deposited during the 80 second reflow.




A conventional deposition chamber can be quickly converted to the inventive reflow chamber by providing a source of gettering material and by replacing the conventional wafer clamp with the preferred shield/clamp/reflector assembly of the present invention. During reflow the inventive reflow chamber does not experience the rapid rise in chamber pressure which plagues conventional reflow chambers. The gettering material readily absorbs contaminants, and contaminants therefore do not increase chamber pressure by remaining in the chamber's atmosphere. Accordingly, chamber base pressure remains more uniform throughout reflow processing of a given batch of wafers, and wafer properties are more uniform between the first and last wafers processed. Further, because contaminants are absorbed by the gettering material a greater number of wafers can be processed before the cryopump needs to be regenerated. Higher throughput, and reduced cost per wafer processed result.




The foregoing description discloses only the preferred embodiments of the invention, modifications of the above disclosed apparatus and method which fall within the scope of the invention will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. For example, although the inventive process preferably employs titanium as a gettering material for use in reflow of aluminum films, other materials (including aluminum) may be employed as a gettering material. Similarly, the inventive method and apparatus are useful for the reflow of materials other than aluminum (e.g., copper, etc.). Furthermore, a fresh layer of gettering material may be deposited before the wafer is placed in the chamber.




While sputtering is the preferred method of introducing gettering material to the inventive reflow chamber, other conventional methods such as thermal evaporation or chemical vapor deposition may be employed.




Accordingly, while the present invention has been disclosed in connection with the preferred embodiments thereof, it should be understood that other embodiments may fall within the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined by the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A device comprising:a ring shaped clamp having a first surface adapted to contact a wafer to be clamped and a second surface opposite the first surface; a shield having a first surface and a second surface opposite the first surface wherein the first surface of the shield is coupled to the second surface of the clamp and sized so as to shield a surface of a wafer clamped along the first surface of the clamp, wherein the wafer, the clamp and the first surface of the shield enclose an interior region; and a plurality of vents adapted to allow contaminants desorbed from a wafer clamped along the first surface of the clamp to flow from the interior region through the vents to an exterior region; wherein the first surface of the shield comprises a reflector.
  • 2. The device of claim 1 wherein the first surface of the clamp comprises a plurality of fingers.
  • 3. The device of claim 1 wherein the second surface of the shield comprises a surface sufficiently rough so as to reduce flaking of a material deposited thereon.
Parent Case Info

This application is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/024,530, filed Feb. 17, 1998 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,077,404.

US Referenced Citations (30)
Number Name Date Kind
3625019 Osterstrom Dec 1971
3892650 Cuomo et al. Jul 1975
3924967 Harra Dec 1975
4062319 Roth et al. Dec 1977
4137012 della Porta et al. Jan 1979
4255465 Bernard et al. Mar 1981
4379832 Dalal et al. Apr 1983
4599970 Peterson Jul 1986
4631002 Pierini Dec 1986
4733631 Boyarsky et al. Mar 1988
4843029 Joyce et al. Jun 1989
4873833 Pfeiffer et al. Oct 1989
4910965 Lepofsky et al. Mar 1990
5019233 Blake et al. May 1991
5039657 Goldman et al. Aug 1991
5135634 Clarke Aug 1992
5154582 Danielson Oct 1992
5161955 Danielson et al. Nov 1992
5171412 Talieh et al. Dec 1992
5320496 Manini et al. Jun 1994
5357760 Higham Oct 1994
5370739 Foster et al. Dec 1994
5520784 Ward May 1996
5622565 Ye et al. Apr 1997
5632873 Stevens et al. May 1997
5656093 Burkhart et al. Aug 1997
5716869 Hibino et al. Feb 1998
5778682 Ouellet Jul 1998
6039854 Liu Mar 2000
6077404 Wang et al. Jun 2000
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
0 595 307 A2 May 1994 EP
0 600 423 A1 Jun 1994 EP
0 693 626 Jan 1996 EP
0 866 498 A2 Sep 1998 EP
2 511 709 Feb 1983 FR
2 120 278 A Nov 1983 GB
58-117371 Dec 1981 JP
58117372 Jul 1983 JP
60222572 Jul 1985 JP
62113876 May 1987 JP
63-107121 May 1988 JP
07161661 Jun 1995 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
Solid State Technology, Jul. 1983, USA, vol. 26, No. 7, ISSN 0038-11X, pp. 39-40, ‘System Gros Complex Single Crystal Materials’.
Proceedings of 32nd Nat'l Symposium of the American Vacuum Society, Houston, TX, USA, 19-22 Nov. 85, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A (Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films), May-Jun. 1986, USA, Ueda S Et Al. ‘A High Performance Molecular Beam Epitaxy System Equipped with the Automatic Substrate Transport Mechanism’, pp. 602-605.
F. Sciuccati et al., “In situ pumping with NEG (non-evaporable getters) during vacuum processing”, Vacuum, vol. 38, No. 8-10, pp. 765-769 (1988).
Technical Paper TP 202, “Gettering” an Integral Part of Vacuum Technology, Dr. Paolo della Porta—SAES Getters S.p.A., Presented at American Vacuum Society, Nov. 9-13, 1992, SAES getters.
Briesacher et al., Ultra Clean Technology, vol. 1, No. 1 pp. 49-57, 1990 “Non-Evaporable Getter Pumps For Semiconductor Processing Equipment”.
Briesacher et al., “Applications for Non-Evaporble Getter Pumps For Semiconductor Processing Equipment”, Presented at 10th Symposium on ULSI Ultra Clean Technology, Kyoiku Kaikan, Nov. 1989.
SAES getters, SORB-AC Getter Wafer Modules and Panels.
M.N. Webster et al., “Al reflow studies for deep-submicron structures: properties and microstructure”, Microelectronic Engineering 37/38, pp. 313-318 (1997).