Refrigerant compositions containing a compatibilizer

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6991744
  • Patent Number
    6,991,744
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 6, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 31, 2006
    18 years ago
Abstract
The present invention provides compositions that are useful for compatibilizing a conventional, non-polar, compression refrigeration lubricant and a hydrofluorocarbon and/or hydrochlorofluorocarbon refrigerant in a compression refrigeration apparatus. Additionally, these compositions promote efficient return of lubricant from the non-compressor zones to the compressor zones of the aforesaid refrigeration apparatus.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to refrigerant compositions comprising relatively polar, halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant; relatively non-polar, conventional, compression refrigeration lubricant; and a compound that compatibilizes said polar halogenated hydrocarbon and non-polar lubricant. The compatibilizer decreases the viscosity of the lubricant in the coldest portions of a compression refrigeration apparatus by solubilizing halogenated hydrocarbon and lubricant, which results in efficient return of the lubricant from non-compressor zones to a compressor zone in a compression refrigeration system. The present invention further relates to a compression refrigeration apparatus containing such a compatibilizer, as well as a method for improving the energy efficiency of a compression refrigeration apparatus comprising the step of using such a compatibilizer in the apparatus.


BACKGROUND

Over the course of the last twenty (20) years it has been debated whether the release of chlofluorocarbons into the atmosphere has effected the stratospheric ozone layer. As a result of this debate and international treaties, the refrigeration and air-conditioning industries have been weaning themselves from the use and production of certain chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs). Presently, the industries are transitioning towards the use of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) having zero ozone depletion potential. Notably, this transition to HFCs necessitated the advent of a new class of lubricants because of the immiscibility of conventional lubricants, such as mineral oil, poly α-olefin and alkylbenzene with HFC refrigerants.


The new class of lubricants includes polyalkylene glycols (PAGs) and polyol esters (POEs) lubricants. While the PAG and POE lubricants have suitable lubricant properties, they are extremely hygroscopic and can absorb several thousand ppm (parts per million) of water on exposure to moist air. This absorbed water leads to undesirable formation of acids that cause corrosion of the refrigeration system and formation of intractable sludges. In comparison, conventional refrigeration lubricants are considerably less hygroscopic and have low solubility, less than 100 ppm for water. Further, PAGs and POEs are considerably more expensive than conventional refrigeration lubricants—typically on the order of three to six times more. PAGs and POEs have also been found to have unfavorable electrical insulating properties.


Accordingly, there existed a need and an opportunity to resolve this solubility problem so that the refrigeration industry could utilize the conventional non-polar mineral oil and alkylbenzene lubricants with polar HFC-based refrigerants. Another need and opportunity also existed when the industry began transitioning towards the use of HCFC-based refrigerants as a replacement for pure CFC refrigerants. This need became apparent due to the diminished solubility of HCFCs in mineral oil, which forced the industry to incurr an additional expense of changing the lubricant to an alkylbenzene to achieve adequate lubricating and cooling performance.


For the last ten years the refrigeration and air-conditioning industries have been struggling with these long-felt but unsolved needs, finally, the present invention satisfies the pressing needs of these industries. While numerous attempts have been made to use conventional non-polar lubricants with polar hydrofluorocarbon refrigerants, the lack of solubility of the polar refrigerant in the non-polar conventional lubricant generally results in a highly viscous lubricant in the non-compressor zones, which unfortunately results in insufficient lubricant return to the compressor. When the non-polar conventional lubricant and the polar refrigerant naturally escape the compressor and enter the non-compressor zones, phase separation/insolubilty of the lubricant and the refrigerant occurs. This phase separation contributes to the highly viscous lubricant remaining in the non-compressor zone, whilst the refrigerant continues its path throughout the refrigeration system. The insolubility and highly viscous nature of the lubricant leaves the lubricant stranded in the non-compressor zones, which leads to an undesirable accumulation of lubricant in the non-compressor zones. This accumulation of lubricant and the lack of return of the lubricant to the compressor zone eventually starves the compressor of lubricant and results in the compressor overheating and seizing. Such stranded lubricant may also decrease the efficiency of the refrigeration system by interfering with heat transfer, due to thick lubricant films deposited on interior surfaces of the heat exchangers (e.g. condenser and evaporator). Further, during cold compressor starts, insoluble refrigerant and lubricant may cause compressor seizure due to poor lubrication and foaming of the lubricant.


For the foregoing reasons, there is a well-recognized need in the refrigeration and air-conditioning industries for a compatabilizer that compatibilizes a polar halogenated hydrocarbon and a non-polar conventional lubricant in a compression refrigeration system, and promotes efficient return of lubricant to the compressor.


SUMMARY

The present invention is directed to lubricant and refrigerant compositions containing a compatibilizer that satisfies the refrigeration and air-conditioning industries's problem of insolubility between conventional non-polar compression refrigeration lubricants and polar hydrofluorocarbon and/or hydrochlorofluorocarbon refrigerants. The compatibilizers decrease the viscosity of the non-polar lubricant in the coldest portions of a compression refrigeration apparatus by solubilizing the polar halogenated hydrocarbon and lubricant in the non-compressor zones, which results in efficient return of lubricant from non-compressor zones to a compressor zone. The present invention is also directed to processes for returning lubricant from a non-compressor zone to a compressor zone in a compression refrigeration system, methods of solubilizing a halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant in a lubricant, as well as methods of lubricating a compressor in a compression refrigeration apparatus containing a halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant.


The present invention comprises lubricant compositions for use in compression refrigeration and air conditioning apparatus comprising: (a) at least one lubricant selected from the group consisting of paraffins, napthenes, aromatics and poly-α-olefins, and (b) at least one compatibilizer. The present invention further comprises refrigerant compositions for use in compression refrigeration and air conditioning comprising: (a) at least one halogenated hydrocarbon selected from the group consisting of hydrofluorocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons; (b) at least one lubricant selected from the group consisting of paraffins, napthenes, aromatics and poly-α-olefins; and (c) at least one compatibilizer. The present invention further comprises compositions for use in compression refrigeration and air conditioning apparatus containing paraffinic, napthenic, aromatic and/or poly-α-olefinic lubricant comprising: (a) at least one halogenated hydrocarbon selected from the group consisting of hydrofluorocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons; and (b) at least one compatibilizer.


The present invention also provides processes for returning lubricant from a non-compressor zone to a compressor zone in a compression refrigeration system comprising: (a) contacting a lubricant selected from the group consisting of paraffins, naphthenes, aromatics, and polyalphaolefins, in said non-compressor zone with a halogenated hydrocarbon selected from the group consisting of hydrofluorocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons, in the presence of a compatibilizer to form a solution comprising said lubricant, said halogenated hydrocarbon, and said compatibilizer; and (b) transferring said solution from said non-compressor zone to said compressor zone of said refrigeration system.


The present invention further provides methods of solubilizing a halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant selected from the group consisting of hydrofluorocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons, in a lubricant selected from the group consisting of paraffins, naphthenes, aromatics, and polyalphaolefins, which comprise the steps of contacting said lubricant with said halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant in the presence of an effective amount of a compatibilizer and forming a solution of said lubricant and said halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant.


The present invention further pertains to methods of lubricating a compressor in a compression refrigeration apparatus containing a halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant selected from the group consisting of hydrofluorocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons, comprising the step of adding to said compressor a composition comprising: (a) at least one lubricant selected from the group consisting of paraffins, naphthenes, aromatics, and polyalphaolefins; and (b) at least one compatibilizer. The present invention also pertains to a method for delivering a compatibilizer to a compression refrigeration apparatus.


The present invention is also directed to a refrigeration apparatus comprising a.) a compression refrigeration circuit comprising a compressor, an evaporator and a condensor, and b.) an insulating plenum containing a refrigeration chamber, said refrigeration chamber being in contact with said evaporator, and said refrigeration circuit containing a composition comprising a compatibilizer.


The present invention is also directed to a method for improving the energy efficiency of a compression refrigeration apparatus containing closed cell polymer foam containing gaseous hydrofluorocarbon in said cells, comprising the step of using a composition comprising a compatibilizer in the compression refrigeration apparatus.


The lubricants and/or refrigerant compositions, as well as the above described methods and/or processes can optionally include a fragrance.


Compatibilizers of the present invention include:


(i) polyoxyalkylene glycol ethers represented by the formula R1[(OR2)xOR3]y, wherein: x is selected from integers from 1 to 3; y is selected from integers from 1 to 4; R1 is selected from hydrogen and aliphatic hydrocarbon radicals having 1 to 6 carbon atoms and y bonding sites; R2 is selected from aliphatic hydrocarbylene radicals having from 2 to 4 carbon atoms; R3 is selected from hydrogen, and aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals having from 1 to 6 carbon atoms; at least one of R1 and R3 is selected from said hydrocarbon radicals; and wherein said polyoxyalkylene glycol ethers have a molecular weight of from about 100 to about 300 atomic mass units and a carbon to oxygen ratio of from about 2.3 to about 5.0;


(ii) amides represented by the formulae R1CONR2R3 and cyclo-[R4CON(R5)-], wherein R1, R2, R3 and R5 are independently selected from aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals having from 1 to 12 carbon atoms, and at most one aromatic radical having from 6 to 12 carbon atoms; R4 is selected from aliphatic hydrocarbylene radicals having from 3 to 12 carbon atoms; and wherein said amides have a molecular weight of from about 120 to about 300 atomic mass units and a carbon to oxygen ratio of from about 7 to about 20,


(iii) ketones represented by the formula R1COR2, wherein R1 and R2 are independently selected from aliphatic, alicyclic and aryl hydrocarbon radicals having from 1 to 12 carbon atoms, and wherein said ketones have a molecular weight of from about 70 to about 300 atomic mass units and a carbon to oxygen ratio of from about 4 to about 13,


(iv) nitriles represented by the formula R1CN, wherein R1 is selected from aliphatic, alicyclic or aryl hydrocarbon radicals having from 5 to 12 carbon atoms, and wherein said nitriles have a molecular weight of from about 90 to about 200 atomic mass units and a carbon to nitrogen ratio of from about 6 to about 12,


(v) chlorocarbons represented by the formula RClx, wherein; x is selected from the integers 1 or 2; R is selected from aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals having from 1 to 12 carbon atoms; and wherein said chlorocarbons have a molecular weight of from about 100 to about 200 atomic mass units and carbon to chlorine ratio from about 2 to about 10,


(vi) aryl ethers represented by the formula R1OR2, wherein: R1 is selected from aryl hydrocarbon radicals having from 6 to 12 carbon atoms; R2 is selected from aliphatic hydrocarbon radicals having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms; and wherein said aryl ethers have a molecular weight of from about 100 to about 150 atomic mass units and a carbon to oxygen ratio of from about 4 to about 20,


(vii) 1,1,1-trifluoroalkanes represented by the formula CF3R1, wherein R1 is selected from aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals having from about 5 to about 15 carbon atoms; and


(viii) fluoroethers represented by the formula R1OCF2CF2H, wherein R1 is selected from aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals having from about 5 to about 15 carbon atoms.


In the compositions of the present invention, the weight ratio of said lubricant to said compatibilizer is from about 99:1 to about 1:1.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The present invention is better understood with reference to the following figures, where:



FIG. 1 is a graph of phase separation temperature (“PST”)(° C.) versus carbon to oxygen ratio for various polyoxyalkylene glycol ether compatibilizers (25 wt %), HFC-134a refrigerant (50 wt %) and Zerol® 150 (alkyl benzene lubricant from Shrieve Chemicals) (25 wt %).



FIG. 2 is a graph of phase separation temperature (° C.) versus carbon to oxygen ratio for various polyoxyalkylene glycol ether compatibilizers (10 wt %), R401A refrigerant (50 wt %) and Suniso® 3GS (mineral oil lubricant from Crompton Co.) (40 wt %).



FIG. 3 is a graph of phase separation temperature (° C.) versus carbon to oxygen ratio for various ketone compatibilizers (25 wt %), HFC-134a refrigerant (50 wt %) and Zerol® 150 (25 wt %).



FIG. 4 is a graph of phase separation temperature (° C.) versus carbon to nitrogen ratio for various nitrile compatibilizers (25 wt %), HFC-134a refrigerant (50 wt %) and Zerol® 150 (25 wt %).



FIG. 5 is a graph of phase separation temperature (° C.) versus carbon to chlorine ratio for various chlorocarbon compatibilizers (25 wt %), HFC-134a refrigerant (50 wt %) and Zerol® 150 (25 wt %).



FIG. 6 is a graph of phase separation temperature (° C.) versus carbon to chlorine ratio for various chlorocarbon compatibilizers (10 wt %), R401A refrigerant (50 wt %) and Suniso® 3GS (40 wt %).



FIG. 7 is a graph of phase separation temperature (° C.) versus carbon to oxygen ratio for various amide compatibilizers (25 wt %), HFC-134a refrigerant (50 wt %) and Zerol® 150 (25 wt %).



FIG. 8 is a graph of phase separation temperature (° C.) versus carbon to oxygen ratio for various amide compatibilizers (10 wt %), R401A refrigerant (50 wt %) and Suniso® 3GS (40 wt %).



FIG. 9 shows graphs of phase separation temperature (° C.) versus carbon to oxygen ratio for various polyoxyalkylene glycol ether compatibilizers (25 wt %), Zerol® 150 (25 wt %) and refrigerant HFC-32, HFC-125 or R410A (50 wt %).



FIG. 10 is a graph of dynamic viscosity versus temperature for POE22 (Mobil Oil product Arctic EAL22, a polyol ester lubricant having a kinematic viscosity of 22 cs at 40° C.), Zerol® 150 and the composition: 10 wt % Propylene glycol n-butyl ether (PnB), 5 wt % Dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether (DPnB) and 85 wt % Zerol® 150.





These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description and the appended claims.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present inventors discovered that using an effective amount of the present compatibilizers in conventional compression refrigeration lubricants results in efficient return of lubricant from non-compressor zones to a compressor zone in a compression refrigeration system. The compatibilizers travel throughout a compression refrigeration system mixed with refrigerant and with lubricant that escapes the compressor. Use of compatibilizers results in the decrease of the viscosity of lubricant in the coldest portions of compression refrigeration systems, such as an evaporator, thereby enabling return of the lubricant from the evaporator to the compressor. The inventors discovered that the viscosity of lubricant in the coldest sections of compression refrigeration systems is reduced upon use of the present compatibilizers. This reduction in lubricant viscosity is due to an increase in solubility of halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerants in lubricant containing the compatibilizers. Through control of the ratio of carbon to polar groups (e.g. ether, carbonyl, nitrile, halogen) in the compatibilizer, the inventors discovered that the polar group-containing compatibilizer could surprisingly be caused to remain miscible with the essentially non-polar lubricants in the coldest sections of compression refrigeration apparatus and simultaneously increase the solubility of halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant in the lubricant. Without wishing to be bound by theory, the polar functional groups in the present compatibilizers are attracted to the relatively polar halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant while the hydrocarbon portion of the compatibilizer is miscible with the relatively low polarity lubricant. The result upon use of the present compatibilizers in the present conventional lubricants is an increase in the solubility of halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerants in lubricant containing an effective amount of compatibilizer. This increased solubility of the relatively nonviscous halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant in conventional lubricants leads to lowering of the viscosity of the lubricant, and results in efficient return of lubricant from non-compressor zones to a compressor zone in a compression refrigeration system. Reducing the amount of lubricant in the evaporator zone also improves heat transfer of the refrigerant and thus improves refrigerating capacity and efficiency of a system. Thus, the present compatibilizers allow for the use of relatively polar halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerants, such as hydrofluorocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons, with relatively non-polar conventional lubricants; mixtures which are normally immiscible and previously thought to be not useful together as refrigerant compositions in compression refrigeration systems.


The result of increased solubility of halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerants in conventional lubricants further allows liquid refrigerant to dissolve and carry stranded lubricant out of the condenser, improving both lubricant return and heat transfer in the condenser and resulting in improved capacity and efficiency of the refrigeration system.


The present compatibilizers improve the energy efficiency and capacity of a compression refrigeration system by increasing the enthalpy change upon desorption of halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant from lubricant and compatibilizer composition in the evaporator, as well as absorption of refrigerant into the lubricant and compatibilizer composition in the condenser. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that forming and breaking attractions between the refrigerant and the polar functional group-containing compatibilizer results in the increase in enthalpy change.


In most instances, the volume resistivity (ohm×cm) of polyol ester and polyalkylene glycol lubricants presently used with hydrofluorocarbon-based refrigerants is unacceptably low. The present compositions comprising compatibilizer and conventional lubricant have increased volume resistivity versus polyol ester and polyalkylene glycol lubricants.


The present compatibilizers may benefically increase the viscosity index of conventional lubricants. This gives the desirable result of lower viscosity at low temperature without significantly lowering viscosity at high temperature, a viscosity profile similar to that of many polyol esters. Such a viscosity index ensures lubricant return from the evaporator while maintaining acceptable viscosity for compressor operation.


The present compatibilizers are useful in retrofit applications where converting a refrigeration or air conditioning system from a hydrofluorocarbon/POE lubricant composition to a hydrofluorocarbon/conventional lubricant composition. Normally in a system containing a POE-type lubricant, the lubricant must be essentially completely removed and then the system flushed several times before introducing conventional lubricant (e.g., mineral oil, alkylbenzenes). However, compatibilizer may be introduced with the conventional lubricant and flushing of essentially all POE-type lubricant is not necessary. Use of compatbilizer in retrofit to a hydrofluorocarbon/conventional lubricant composition eliminates the need for flushing to remove essentially all POE. Trace or residual POE lubricant is miscible with the inventive hydrofluorocarbon/convention oil/compatibilizer composition.


In the present compositions comprising lubricant and compatibilizer, from about 1 to about 50 weight percent, preferably from about 6 to about 45 weight percent, and most preferably from about 10 to about 40 weight percent of the combined lubricant and compatibilizer composition is compatibilizer. In terms of weight ratios, in the present compositions comprising lubricant and compatibilizer, the weight ratio of lubricant to compatibilizer is from about 99:1 to about 1:1, preferably from about 15.7:1 to about 1.2:1, and most preferably from about 9:1 to about 1.5:1. Compatibilizer may be charged to a compression refrigeration system as a composition of compatibilizer and halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant. When charging a compression refrigeration system with the present compatibilizer and halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant compositions, to deliver an amount of compatibilizer such that the aforementioned relative amounts of compatibilizer and lubricant are satisfied, the compatibilizer and halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant composition will typically contain from about 0.1 to about 40 weight percent, preferably from about 0.2 to about 20 weight percent, and most preferably from about 0.3 to about 10 weight percent compatibilizer in the combined compatibilizer and halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant composition. In compression refrigeration systems containing the present compositions comprising halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant, lubricant and compatibilizer, from about 1 to about 70 weight percent, preferably from about 10 to about 60 weight percent of the halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant, lubricant and compatibilizer composition is lubricant and compatibilizer. Compatibilizer concentrations greater than about 50 weight percent of the combined lubricant and compatibilizer composition are typically not needed to obtain acceptable lubricant return from non-compressor zones to a compressor zone. Compatibilizer concentrations greater than about 50 weight percent of the combined lubricant and compatibilizer composition can negatively influence the viscosity of the lubricant, which can lead to inadequate lubrication and stress on, or mechanical failure of, the compressor. Further, compatibilizer concentrations higher than about 50 weight percent of the combined lubricant and compatibilizer composition can negatively influence the refrigeration capacity and performance of a refrigerant composition in a compression refrigeration system. An effective amount of compatibilizer in the present compositions leads to halogenated hydrocarbon and lubricant becoming solubilized to the extent that adequate return of lubricant in a compression refrigeration system from non-compressor zones (e.g. evaporator or condenser) to the compressor zone is obtained.


Halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerants of the present invention contain at least one carbon atom and one fluorine atom. Of particular utility are halogenated hydrocarbons having 1-6 carbon atoms containing at least one fluorine atom, optionally containing chlorine and oxygen atoms, and having a normal boiling point of from −90° C. to 80° C. These halogenated hydrocarbons may be represented by the general formula CwF2w+2−x−yHxClyOz, wherein w is 1-6, x is 1-9, y is 0-3, and z is 0-2. Preferred of the halogenated hydrocarbons are those in which w is 1-6, x is 1-5, y is 0-1, and z is 0-1. The present invention is particularly useful with hydrofluorocarbon and hydrochlorofluorocarbon-based refrigerants. Halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerants are commercial products available from a number of sources such as E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Fluoroproducts, Wilmington, Del., 19898, USA, or are available from custom chemical synthesis companies such as PCR Inc., P.O. Box 1466, Gainesville, Fla., 32602, USA, and additionally by synthetic processes disclosed in art such as The Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, or Chemistry of Organic Fluorine Compounds, edited by Milos Hudlicky, published by The MacMillan Company, New York, N.Y., 1962. Representative halogenated hydrocarbons include: CHClF2 (HCFC-22), CHF3 (HFC-23), CH2F2 (HFC-32), CH3F (HFC-41), CF3CF3 (FC-116), CHClFCF3 (HCFC-124), CHF2CF3 (HFC-125), CH2ClCF3 (HCFC-133a), CHF2CHF2 (HFC-134), CH2FCF3 (HFC-134a), CClF2CH3 (HCFC-142b), CHF2CH2F (HFC-143), CF3CH3 (HFC-143a), CHF2CH3 (HFC-152a), CHF2CF2CF3 (HFC-227ca), CF3CFHCF3 (HFC-227ea), (HFC-236ca), CH2FCF2CF3 (HFC-236cb), CHF2CHFCF3 (HFC-236ea), CF3CH2CF3 (HFC-236fa), CH2FCF2CHF2 (HFC-245ca), CH3CF2CF3 (HFC-245cb), CHF2CHFCHF2 (HFC-245ea), CH2FCHFCF3 (HFC-245eb), CHF2CH2CF3 (HFC-245fa), CH2FCF2CH2F (HFC-254ca), CH2CF2CHF2 (HFC-254cb), CH2FCHFCHF2 (HFC-254ea), CH3CHFCF3 (HFC-254eb), CHF2CH2CHF2 (HFC-254fa), CH2FCH2CF3 (HFC-254fb), CH3CF2CH3 (HFC-272ca), CH3CHFCH2F (HFC-272ea), CH2FCH2CH2F (HFC-272fa), CH3CH2CF2H(HFC-272fb), CH3CHFCH3 (HFC-281ea), CH3CH2CH2F (HFC-281fa), CHF2CF2CF2CF2H(HFC-338 pcc), CF3CHFCHFCF2CF3 (HFC-43-10mee), C4F9OCH3, and C4F9OC2H5.


The present invention is particularly useful with the hydrofluorocarbon and hydrochlorofluorocarbon-based refrigerants, such as, CHClF2 (HCFC-22), CHF3 (HFC-23), CH2F2 (HFC-32), CHClFCF3 (HCFC-124), CHF2CF3 (HFC-125), CHF2CHF2 (HFC-134), CH2FCF3 (HFC-134a), CF3CH3 (HFC-143a), CHF2CH3 (HFC-152a), CHF2CF2CF3 (HFC-227ca), CF3CFHCF3 (HFC-227ea), CF3CH2CF3 (HFC-236fa), CHF2CH2CF3 (HFC-245fa), CHF2CF2CF2CF2H(HFC-338 pcc), CF3CHFCHFCF2CF3 (HFC-43-10mee); and the azeotropic and azeotrope-like halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant compositions, such as, HCFC-22/HFC-152a/HCFC-124 (known by the ASHRAE designations, R-401A, R-401B, and R-401C), HFC-125/HFC-143a/HFC-134a (known by the ASHRAE designation, R-404A), HFC-32/HFC-125/HFC-134a (known by ASHRAE designations, R-407A, R-407B, and R-407C), HCFC-22/HFC-143a/HFC-125 (known by the ASHRAE designation, R-408A), HCFC-22/HCFC-124/HCFC-142b (known by the ASHRAE designation: R-409A), HFC-32/HFC-125 (R-410A), and HFC-125/HFC-143a (known by the ASHRAE designation: R-507).


The halogenated hydrocarbons of the present invention may optionally further comprise up to 10 weight percent of dimethyl ether, or at least one C3 to C5 hydrocarbon, e.g., propane, propylene, cyclopropane, n-butane, i-butane, and n-pentane. Examples of halogenated hydrocarbons containing such C3 to C5 hydrocarbons are azeotrope-like compositions of HCFC-22/HFC-125/propane (known by the ASHRAE designation, R-402A and R-402B) and HCFC-22/octafluoropropane/propane (known by the ASHRAE designation, R-403A and R-403B).


Lubricants of the present invention are those conventionally used in compression refrigeration apparatus utilizing chlorofluorocarbon refrigerants. Such lubricants and their properties are discussed in the 1990 ASHRAE Handbook, Refrigeration Systems and Applications, chapter 8, titled “Lubricants in Refrigeration Systems”, pages 8.1 through 8.21, herein incorporated by reference. Lubricants of the present invention are selected by considering a given compressor's requirements and the environment to which the lubricant will be exposed. Lubricants of the present invention preferrably have a kinematic viscosity of at least about 15 cs (centistokes) at 40° C. Lubricants of the present invention comprise those commonly known as “mineral oils” in the field of compression refrigeration lubrication. Mineral oils comprise paraffins (i.e. straight-chain and branched-carbon-chain, saturated hydrocarbons), naphthenes (i.e. cyclic paraffins) and aromatics (i.e. unsaturated, cyclic hydrocarbons containing one or more rings characterized by alternating double bonds). Lubricants of the present invention further comprise those commonly known as “synthetic oils” in the field of compression refrigeration lubrication. Synthetic oils comprise alkylaryls (i.e. linear and branched alkyl alkylbenzenes), synthetic paraffins and napthenes, and poly(alphaolefins). Representative conventional lubricants of the present invention are the commercially available BVM 100 N (paraffinic mineral oil sold by BVA Oils), Suniso® 3GS (napthenic mineral oil sold by Crompton Co.), Sontex® 372LT (napthenic mineral oil sold by Pennzoil), Calumet® RO-30 (napthenic mineral oil sold by Calument Lubricants), Zerol® 75 and Zerol® 150 (linear alkylbenzenes sold by Shrieve Chemicals) and HAB 22 (branched alkylbenzene sold by Nippon Oil).


Compatibilizers of the present invention comprise polyoxyalkylene glycol ethers represented by the formula R1 [(OR2)xOR3]y, wherein: x is selected from integers from 1-3; y is selected from integers from 1-4; R1 is selected from hydrogen and aliphatic hydrocarbon radicals having 1 to 6 carbon atoms and y bonding sites; R2 is selected from aliphatic hydrocarbylene radicals having from 2 to 4 carbon atoms; R3 is selected from hydrogen and aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals having from 1 to 6 carbon atoms; at least one of R1 and R3 is said hydrocarbon radical; and wherein said polyoxyalkylene glycol ethers have a molecular weight of from about 100 to about 300 atomic mass units and a carbon to oxygen ratio of from about 2.3 to about 5.0. In the present polyoxyalkylene glycol ether compatibilizers represented by R1[(OR2)xOR3]y: x is preferably 1-2; y is preferably 1; R1 and R3 are preferably independently selected from hydrogen and aliphatic hydrocarbon radicals having 1 to 4 carbon atoms; R2 is preferably selected from aliphatic hydrocarbylene radicals having from 2 or 3 carbon atoms, most preferably 3 carbon atoms; the polyoxyalkylene glycol ether molecular weight is preferably from about 100 to about 250 atomic mass units, most preferably from about 125 to about 250 atomic mass units; and the polyoxyalkylene glycol ether carbon to oxygen ratio is preferably from about 2.5 to 4.0 when hydrofluorocarbons are used as halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant, most preferably from about 2.7 to about 3.5 when hydrofluorocarbons are used as halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant, and preferably from about 3.5 to 5.0 when hydrochlorofluorocarbon-containing refrigerants are used as halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant, most preferably from about 4.0 to about 4.5 when hydrochlorofluorocarbon-containing refrigerants are used as halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant. The R1 and R3 hydrocarbon radicals having 1 to 6 carbon atoms may be linear, branched or cyclic. Representative R1 and R3 hydrocarbon radicals include methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, butyl, isobutyl, sec-butyl, tert-butyl, pentyl, isopentyl, neopentyl, tert-pentyl, cyclopentyl, and cyclohexyl. Where free hydroxyl radicals on the present polyoxyalkylene glycol ether compatibilizers may be incompatible with certain compression refrigeration apparatus materials of construction (e.g. Mylar®), R1 and R3 are preferably aliphatic hydrocarbon radicals having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, most preferably 1 carbon atom. The R2 aliphatic hydrocarbylene radicals having from 2 to 4 carbon atoms form repeating oxyalkylene radicals —(OR2)x— that include oxyethylene radicals, oxypropylene radicals, and oxybutylene radicals. The oxyalkylene radical comprising R2 in one polyoxyalkylene glycol ether compatibilizer molecule may be the same, or one molecule may contain different R2 oxyalkylene groups. The present polyoxyalkylene glycol ether compatibilizers preferably comprise at least one oxypropylene radical. Where R1 is an aliphatic or alicyclic hydrocarbon radical having 1 to 6 carbon atoms and y bonding sites, the radical may be linear, branched or cyclic. Representative R1 aliphatic hydrocarbon radicals having two bonding sites include, for example, an ethylene radical, a propylene radical, a butylene radical, a pentylene radical, a hexylene radical, a cyclopentylene radical and a cyclohexylene radical. Representative R1 aliphatic hydrocarbon radicals having three or four bonding sites include residues derived from polyalcohols, such as trimethylolpropane, glycerin, pentaerythritol, 1,2,3-trihydroxycyclohexane and 1,3,5-trihydroxycyclohexane, by removing their hydroxyl radicals. Representative polyoxyalkylene glycol ether compatibilizers include: CH3OCH2CH(CH3)O(H or CH3) (propylene glycol methyl (or dimethyl) ether), CH3O[CH2CH(CH3)O]2(H or CH3) (dipropylene glycol methyl (or dimethyl) ether), CH3O[CH2CH(CH3)O]3(H or CH3) (tripropylene glycol methyl (or dimethyl) ether), C2H5OCH2CH(CH3)O(H or C2H5) (propylene glycol ethyl (or diethyl) ether), C2H5O[CH2CH(CH3)O]2(H or C2H5) (dipropylene glycol ethyl (or diethyl) ether), C2H5O[CH2CH(CH3)O]3(H or C2H5) (tripropylene glycol ethyl (or diethyl) ether), C3H7OCH2CH(CH3)O(H or C3H7) (propylene glycol n-propyl (or di-n-propyl) ether), C3H7O[CH2CH(CH3)O]2(H or C3H7) (dipropylene glycol n-propyl (or di-n-propyl) ether), C3H7O[CH2CH(CH3)O]3(H or C3H7) (tripropylene glycol n-propyl (or di-n-propyl) ether), C4H9OCH2CH(CH3)OH (propylene glycol n-butyl ether), C4H9O[CH2CH(CH3)O]2(H or C4H9) (dipropylene glycol n-butyl (or di-n-butyl) ether), C4H9O[CH2CH(CH3)O]3(H or C4H9) (tripropylene glycol n-butyl (or di-n-butyl) ether), (CH3)3COCH2CH(CH3)OH (propylene glycol t-butyl ether), (CH3)3CO[CH2CH(CH3)O]2(H or (CH3)3) (dipropylene glycol t-butyl (or di-t-butyl) ether), (CH3)3CO[CH2CH(CH3)O]3(H or (CH3)3) (tripropylene glycol t-butyl (or di-t-butyl) ether), C5H11 OCH2CH(CH3)OH (propylene glycol n-pentyl ether), C4H9OCH2CH(C2H5)OH (butylene glycol n-butyl ether), C4H9O[CH2CH(C2H5)O]2H (dibutylene glycol n-butyl ether), trimethylolpropane tri-n-butyl ether (C2H5C(CH2O(CH2)3CH3)3) and trimethylolpropane di-n-butyl ether (C2H5C(CH2OC(CH2)3CH3)2CH2OH).


Compatibilizers of the present invention further comprise amides represented by the formulae R1CONR2R3 and cyclo-[R4CON(R5)-], wherein R1, R2, R3 and R5 are independently selected from aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals having from 1 to 12 carbon atoms, and at most one aromatic radical having from 6 to 12 carbon atoms; R4 is selected from aliphatic hydrocarbylene radicals having from 3 to 12 carbon atoms; and wherein said amides have a molecular weight of from about 120 to about 300 atomic mass units and a carbon to oxygen ratio of from about 7 to about 20. The molecular weight of said amides is preferably from about 160 to about 250 atomic mass units. The carbon to oxygen ratio in said amides is preferably from about 7 to about 16, and most preferably from about 10 to about 14. R1, R2, R3 and R5 may optionally include substituted radicals, that is, radicals containing non-hydrocarbon substituents selected from halogens (e.g., fluorine, chlorine) and alkoxides (e.g. methoxy). R1, R2, R3 and R5 may optionally include heteroatom-substituted radicals, that is, radicals which contain the atoms nitrogen (aza-), oxygen (oxa-) or sulfur (thia-) in a radical chain otherwise composed of carbon atoms. In general, no more than three non-hydrocarbon substituents and heteroatoms, and preferably no more than one, will be present for each 10 carbon atoms in R1-3 and R5, and the presence of any such non-hydrocarbon substituents and heteroatoms must be considered in applying the aforementioned ratio of carbon to oxygen and molecular weight limitations. Preferred amide compatibilizers consist of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and oxygen. Representative R1, R2, R3 and R5 aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals include methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, butyl, isobutyl, sec-butyl, tert-butyl, pentyl, isopentyl, neopentyl, tert-pentyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, heptyl, octyl, nonyl, decyl, undecyl, dodecyl and their configurational isomers. Representative R1, R2, R3 and R5 aromatic radicals include phenyl, cumenyl, mesityl, tolyl, xylyl, benzyl, phenethyl, thienyl, furyl, pyrrolyl and pyridyl. A preferred embodiment of amide compatibilizers are those wherein R4 in the aforementioned formula cyclo-[R4CON(R5)-] may be represented by the hydrocarbylene radical (CR6R7)n, in other words, the formula: cyclo-[(CR6R7)nCON(R5)-] wherein: the previously-stated values for (a) ratio of carbon to oxygen and (b) molecular weight apply; n is an integer from 3 to 5; R5 is a saturated hydrocarbon radical containing 1 to 12 carbon atoms; R6 and R7 are indepedently selected (for each n) by the rules previously offered defining R1-3. In the lactams represented by the formula: cyclo-[(CR6R7), CON(R5)-], all R6 and R7 are preferably hydrogen, or contain a single saturated hydrocarbon radical among the n methylene units, and R5 is a saturated hydrocarbon radical containing 3 to 12 carbon atoms. For example, 1-(saturated hydrocarbon radical)-5-methylpyrrolidin-2-ones. Representative amide compatibilizers include: 1-octylpyrrolidin-2-one, 1-decylpyrrolidin-2-one, 1-octyl-5-methylpyrrolidin-2-one, 1-butylcaprolactam, 1-isobutylcaprolactam, 1-cyclohexylpyrrolidin-2-one, 1-cyclohexyl-5-methylpyrrolidin-2-one, 1-butyl-5-methylpiperid-2-one, 1-pentyl-5-methylpiperid-2-one, 1-hexylcaprolactam, 1-hexyl-5-methylpyrrolidin-2-one, 1-heptyl-5-methylpyrrolidin-2-one, 1-nonyl-5-methylpyrrolidin-2-one, 1-undecyl-5-methylpyrrolidin-2-one, 1-dodecyl-5-methylpyrrolidin-2-one, 5-methyl-1-pentylpiperid-2-one, 1,3-dimethylpiperid-2-one, 1-methylcaprolactam, 1-butyl-pyrrolidin-2-one, 1,5-dimethylpiperid-2-one, 1-decyl-5-methylpyrrolidin-2-one, 1-dodecylpyrrolid-2-one, N,N-dibutylformamide and N,N-diisopropylacetamide.


Compatibilizers of the present invention further comprise ketones represented by the formula R1COR2, wherein R1 and R2 are independently selected from aliphatic, alicyclic and aryl hydrocarbon radicals having from 1 to 12 carbon atoms, and wherein said ketones have a molecular weight of from about 70 to about 300 atomic mass units and a carbon to oxygen ratio of from about 4 to about 13. R1 and R2 in said ketones are preferably independently selected from aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals having 1 to 9 carbon atoms. The molecular weight of said ketones is preferably from about 100 to 200 atomic mass units. The carbon to oxygen ratio in said ketones is preferably from about 7 to about 10. R1 and R2 may together form a hydrocarbylene radical connected and forming a five, six, or seven-membered ring cyclic ketone, for example, cyclopentanone, cyclohexanone, and cycloheptanone. R1 and R2 may optionally include substituted hydrocarbon radicals, that is, radicals containing non-hydrocarbon substituents selected from halogens (e.g., fluorine, chlorine) and alkoxides (e.g. methoxy). R1 and R2 may optionally include heteroatom-substituted hydrocarbon radicals, that is, radicals which contain the atoms nitrogen (aza-), oxygen (keto-, oxa-) or sulfur (thia-) in a radical chain otherwise composed of carbon atoms. In general, no more than three non-hydrocarbon substituents and heteroatoms, and preferably no more than one, will be present for each 10 carbon atoms in R1 and R2, and the presence of any such non-hydrocarbon substituents and heteroatoms must be considered in applying the aforementioned ratio of carbon to oxygen and molecular weight limitations. Representative R1 and R2 aliphatic, alicyclic and aryl hydrocarbon radicals in the general formula R1COR2 include methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, butyl, isobutyl, sec-butyl, tert-butyl, pentyl, isopentyl, neopentyl, tert-pentyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, heptyl, octyl, nonyl, decyl, undecyl, dodecyl and their configurational isomers, as well as phenyl, benzyl, cumenyl, mesityl, tolyl, xylyl and phenethyl. Representative ketone compatibilizers include: 2-butanone, 2-pentanone, acetophenone, butyrophenone, hexanophenone, cyclohexanone, cycloheptanone, 2-heptanone, 3-heptanone, 5-methyl-2-hexanone, 2-octanone, 3-octanone, diisobutyl ketone, 4-ethylcyclohexanone, 2-nonanone, 5-nonanone, 2-decanone, 4-decanone, 2-decalone, 2-tridecanone, dihexyl ketone and dicyclohexyl ketone.


Compatibilizers of the present invention further comprise nitrites represented by the formula R1CN, wherein R1 is selected from aliphatic, alicyclic or aryl hydrocarbon radicals having from 5 to 12 carbon atoms, and wherein said nitrites have a molecular weight of from about 90 to about 200 atomic mass units and a carbon to nitrogen ratio of from about 6 to about 12. R1 in said nitrile compatibilizers is preferably selected from aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals having 8 to 10 carbon atoms. The molecular weight of said nitrile compatibilizers is preferably from about 120 to about 140 atomic mass units. The carbon to nitrogen ratio in said nitrile compatibilizers is preferably from about 8 to about 9. R1 may optionally include substituted hydrocarbon radicals, that is, radicals containing non-hydrocarbon substituents selected from halogens (e.g., fluorine, chlorine) and alkoxides (e.g. methoxy). R1 may optionally include heteroatom-substituted hydrocarbon radicals, that is, radicals which contain the atoms nitrogen (aza-), oxygen (keto-, oxa-) or sulfur (thia-) in a radical chain otherwise composed of carbon atoms. In general, no more than three non-hydrocarbon substituents and heteroatoms, and preferably no more than one, will be present for each 10 carbon atoms in R1, and the presence of any such non-hydrocarbon substituents and heteroatoms must be considered in applying the aforementioned ratio of carbon to nitrogen and molecular weight limitations. Representative R1 aliphatic, alicyclic and aryl hydrocarbon radicals in the general formula R1CN include include pentyl, isopentyl, neopentyl, tert-pentyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, heptyl, octyl, nonyl, decyl, undecyl, dodecyl and their configurational isomers, as well as phenyl, benzyl, cumenyl, mesityl, tolyl, xylyl and phenethyl. Representative nitrile compatibilizers include: 1-cyanopentane, 2,2-dimethyl-4-cyanopentane, 1-cyanohexane, 1-cyanoheptane, 1-cyanooctane, 2-cyanooctane, 1-cyanononane, 1-cyanodecane, 2-cyanodecane, 1-cyanoundecane and 1-cyanododecane. Nitrile compatibilizers are especially useful in compatibilizing HFC refrigerants with aromatic and alkylaryl lubricants.


Compatibilizers of the present invention further comprise chlorocarbons represented by the formula RClx, wherein; x is selected from the integers 1 or 2; R is selected from aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals having 1 to 12 carbon atoms; and wherein said chlorocarbons have a molecular weight of from about 100 to about 200 atomic mass units and carbon to chlorine ratio from about 2 to about 10. The molecular weight of said chlorocarbon compatibilizers is preferably from about 120 to 150 atomic mass units. The carbon to chlorine ratio in said chlorocarbon compatibilizers is preferably from about 6 to about 7. Representative R aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals in the general formula RClx include methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, butyl, isobutyl, sec-butyl, tert-butyl, pentyl, isopentyl, neopentyl, tert-pentyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, heptyl, octyl, nonyl, decyl, undecyl, dodecyl and their configurational isomers. Representative chlorocarbon compatibilizers include: 3-(chloromethyl)pentane, 3-chloro-3-methylpentane, 1-chlorohexane, 1,6-dichlorohexane, 1-chloroheptane, 1-chlorooctane, 1-chlorononane, 1-chlorodecane, and 1,1,1-trichlorodecane.


Compatibilizers of the present invention further comprise aryl ethers represented by the formula R1OR2, wherein: R1 is selected from aryl hydrocarbon radicals having from 6 to 12 carbon atoms; R2 is selected from aliphatic hydrocarbon radicals having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms; and wherein said aryl ethers have a molecular weight of from about 100 to about 150 atomic mass units and a carbon to oxygen ratio of from about 4 to about 20. The carbon to oxygen ratio in said aryl ether compatibilizers is preferably from about 7 to about 10. Representative R1 aryl radicals in the general formula R1OR2 include phenyl, biphenyl, cumenyl, mesityl, tolyl, xylyl, naphthyl and pyridyl. Representative R2 aliphatic hydrocarbon radicals in the general formula R1OR2 include methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, butyl, isobutyl, sec-butyl and tert-butyl. Representative aromatic ether compatibilizers include: methyl phenyl ether (anisole), 1,3-dimethyoxybenzene, ethyl phenyl ether and butyl phenyl ether.


Compatibilizers of the present invention further comprise 1,1,1-trifluoroalkanes represented by the general formula CF3R1, wherein R1 is selected from aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals having from about 5 to about 15 carbon atoms, preferably primary, linear, saturated, alkyl radicals. Representative 1,1,1-trifluoroalkane compatibilizers include: 1,1,1-trifluorohexane and 1,1,1-trifluorododecane.


Compatibilizers of the present invention further comprise fluoroethers represented by the general formula R1OCF2CF2H, wherein R1 is selected from aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals having from about 5 to about 15 carbon atoms, preferably primary, linear, saturated, alkyl radicals. Representative fluoroether compatibilizers include: C8H17OCF2CF2H and C6H13OCF2CF2H.


Compatibilizers of the present invention may comprise a single compatibilizer species or multiple compatibilizer species together in any proportion. For example, a compatibilizer may comprise a mixture of compounds from within a single compatibilizer species (e.g. a mixture of polyoxyalkylene glycol ethers) or a mixture of compounds chosen from different compatibilizer species (e.g. a mixture of a polyoxyalkylene glycol ether with a ketone).


Compatibilizer of the present invention may optionally further comprise from about 1 to about 50 weight percent, preferably from about 1 to about 10 weight percent based on total amount of compatibilizer, of an ester containing the functional group —CO2— and having a carbon to ester functional group carbonyl oxygen ratio of from about 2 to about 6. The optional esters may be represented by the general formula R1CO2R2, wherein R1 and R2 are independently selected from linear and cyclic, saturated and unsaturated, alkyl and aryl radicals. R1 and R2 are optionally connected forming a ring, such as a lactone. Preferred optional esters consist essentially of the elements C, H and O having a molecular weight of from about 80 to about 550 atomic mass units. Representative optional esters include: (CH3)2CHCH2OOC(CH2)2-4OCOCH2CH(CH3)2 (diisobutyl dibasic ester), ethyl hexanoate, ethyl heptanoate, n-butyl proprionate, n-propyl proprionate, ethyl benzoate, di-n-propyl phthalate, benzoic acid ethoxyethyl ester, dipropyl carbonate, “Exxate 700” (a commercial C7 alkyl acetate), “Exxate 800” (a commercial C8 alkyl acetate), dibutyl phthalate, and t-butyl acetate.


Compatibilizer of the present invention may optionally further comprise at least one polyvinyl ether polymer, including polyvinyl ether homopolymers, polyvinyl ether copolymers, and copolymers of vinyl ethers with hydrocarbon alkenes (e.g. ethylene and propylene), and/or functionalized hydrocarbon alkenes (e.g., vinyl acetate and styrene). A representative polyvinyl ether is PVE 32, sold by Idemitsu Kosan and having a kinematic viscosity of 32 cs at 40° C.


Compatibilizers of the present invention may optionally further comprise from about 0.5 to about 50 weight percent (based on total amount of compatibilizer) of a linear or cyclic aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbon containing from 5 to 15 carbon atoms. Representative hydrocarbons include pentane, hexane, octane, nonane, decane, Isopar® H (a high purity C11 to C12 iso-paraffinic), Aromatic 150 (a C9 to C11 aromatic), Aromatic 200 (a C9 to C15 aromatic) and Naptha 140. All of these hydrocarbons are sold by Exxon Chemical, USA.


Compatibilizers of the present invention may optionally further contain from about 0.01 to 30 weight percent (based on total amount of compatibilizer) of an additive which reduces the surface energy of metallic copper, aluminum, steel, or other metals found in heat exchangers in a way that reduces the adhesion of lubricants to the metal. Examples of metal surface energy reducing additives include those disclosed in WIPO PCT publication WO 96/7721, such as Zonyl® FSA, Zonyl® FSP and Zonyl® FSj, all products of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. In practice, by reducing the adhesive forces between the metal and the lubricant (i.e. substituting for a compound more tightly bound to the metal), the lubricant circulates more freely through the heat exchangers and connecting tubing in an air conditioning or refrigeration system, instead of remaining as a layer on the surface of the metal. This allows for the increase of heat transfer to the metal and allows efficient return of lubricant to the compressor.


Commonly used refrigeration system additives may optionally be added, as desired, to compositions of the present invention in order to enhance lubricity and system stability. These additives are generally known within the field of refrigeration compressor lubrication, and include anti wear agents, extreme pressure lubricants, corrosion and oxidation inhibitors, metal surface deactivators, free radical scavengers, foaming and antifoam control agents, leak detectants and the like. In general, these additives are present only in small amounts relative to the overall lubricant composition. They are typically used at concentrations of from less than about 0.1% to as much as about 3% of each additive. These additives are selected on the basis of the individual system requirements. Some typical examples of such additives may include, but are not limited to, lubrication enhancing additives, such as alkyl or aryl esters of phosphoric acid and of thiophosphates. These include members of the triaryl phosphate family of EP lubricity additives, such as butylated triphenyl phosphates (BTPP), or other alkylated triaryl phosphate esters, e.g. Syn-0-Ad 8478 from Akzo Chemicals, tricrecyl phosphates and related compounds. Additionally, the metal dialkyl dithiophosphates (e.g. zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate or ZDDP, Lubrizol 1375) and other members of this family of chemicals may be used in compositions of the present invention. Other antiwear additives include natural product oils and assymetrical polyhydroxyl lubrication additives such as Synergol TMS (International Lubricants). Similarly, stabilizers such as anti oxidants, free radical scavengers, and water scavengers may be employed. Compounds in this category can include, but are not limited to, butylated hydroxy toluene (BHT) and epoxides.


Compatiblizers such as ketones may have an objectionable odor which can be masked by addition of an odor masking agent or fragrance. Typical examples of odor masking agents or fragrances may include Evergreen, Fresh Lemon, Cherry, Cinnamon, Peppermint, Floral or Orange Peel or sold by Intercontinental Fragrance, as well as d-limonene and pinene. Such odor masking agents may be used at concentrations of from about 0.001% to as much as about 15% by weight based on the combined weight of odor masking agent and compatibilizer.


The present invention further comprises processes for producing refrigeration comprising evaporating the present halogenated hydrocarbon-containing refrigeration compositions in the vicinity of a body to be cooled, and processes for producing heat comprising condensing halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant in the presence of lubricant and compatibilizer in the presence of a body to be heated.


The present invention further comprises processes for solubilizing a halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant in a lubricant, comprising contacting the halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant with the lubricant in the presence of an effective amount of compatibilizer, which forms a solution of the halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant and the lubricant.


The present invention further relates to processes for returning lubricant from a non-compressor zone to a compressor zone in a compression refrigeration system comprising:


(a) contacting the lubricant in the non-compressor zone with at least one halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant in the presence of an effective amount of compatibilizer; and


(b) returning the lubricant from the noncompressor zone to the compressor zone of the refrigeration system.


The present invention further comprises processes for returning a lubricant from a low pressure zone to a compressor zone in a refrigeration system, comprising:


(a) contacting the lubricant in the low pressure zone of the refrigeration system with at least one halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant in the presence of an effective amount of compatibilizer; and


(b) returning the lubricant from the low pressure zone to the compressor zone of the refrigeration system.


The refrigerated zones of a compression refrigeration system are often surrounded by insulation that increases the system's energy efficiency. Such insulation typically comprises thermoplastic or thermoset polymer foam, primarily rigid, closed cell, polyisocyanurate and polyurethane foam. With the use of chlorofluorocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons as polymer foam blowing agents being phased out, non-ozone-depleting hydrofluorocarbons such as 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a) and 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC 245fa) are finding utility as alternate blowing agents. The low cell gas thermal conductivity of rigid polyurethane foams which is maintained over time is the key to the superior thermal insulating properties of these foams. While the hydrofluorocarbons satisfy the majority of blowing agent performance criteria (e.g., volatility, nonreactive, solubility, heat of evaporation), they have higher vapor thermal conductivity than the conventional chlorofluorocarbon and hydrochlorofluorocarbon blowing agents. Insulating foams produced with hydrofluorocarbon blowing agents are finding wide utility, however these foams have slightly poorer insulating properties than identical foams blown with conventional blowing agents which is a problem requiring a solution.


The present compatibilizers improve the energy efficiency and capacity of a compression refrigeration system as previously discussed, and so their use may more than compensate for any lowering of energy efficiency in a refrigeration system that results from use if insulating foam blown with hydrofluorocarbon. The present inventors have discovered a refrigeration system in which the refrigeration zone is surrounded by polymer insulation foamed with hydrofluorocarbon blowing agent, and in which the refrigeration system uses the aforementioned refrigerant compositions containing a compatibilizer. Thus, the present invention further includes a refrigeration apparatus comprising a compression refrigeration circuit comprising a compressor, an evaporator and a condenser, said circuit containing compatibilizer, and an insulating plenum containing a refrigeration chamber in contact with said evaporator. The refrigeration circuit contains a halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant selected from hydrofluorocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons, a lubricant selected from paraffins, napthenes, aromatics and poly-alpha-olefins, and an effective amount of a previously defined compatibilizer. The insulating plenum comprises a polymer foam blown with a hydrofluorocarbon blowing agent. The insulating plenum preferably comprises rigid, closed cell, thermoplastic (e.g., polystyrene) or thermoset (e.g., polyisocyanurate and polyurethane) polymer foam, blown with a hydrofluorocarbon blowing agent, the cells of said foam containing gaseous hydrofluorocarbon. The evaporator may be in direct or indirect (e.g., secondary loop configuration) contact with said refrigeration chamber. The present inventon further includes a method for improving the energy efficiency of a compression refrigeration system containing closed cell polymer insulating foam that contains gaseous hydrofluorocarbon in the cells of the foam, comprising using a previously defined compatibilizer in the compression refrigeration system.


EXAMPLES

The following examples are provided to illustrate certain aspects of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.


Herein, all percentages (%) are in weight percentages unless otherwise indicated.


Naptha 140 (paraffins and cycloparaffins with normal boiling point of 188-208° C.), Aromatic 150 (aromatics with normal boiling point 184-204° C.) and Isopar® H (isoparaffins with normal boiling point 161-203° C.) are all products of Exxon Chemicals. Exxate 700 is a C7 alkyl acetate produced by Exxon. “POE 22” is used herein as an abbreviation for Mobil Oil product Arctic EAL22, a polyol ester lubricant having a kinematic viscosity of 22 cs at 40° C. “POE 32” is used herein as an abbreviation for Uniqema product Emkarate RL32, a polyol ester lubricant having a kinematic viscosity of 32 cs at 40° C. Zerol 75 is an alkylbenzene lubricant having a kinematic viscosity of 15 cs at 40° C., Zerol 150 is an alkylbenzene lubricant having a kinematic viscosity of 32 cs at 40° C., Zerol 200 TD is an alkylbenzene lubricant having a kinematic viscosity of 40 cs at 40° C., and Zerol 300 is an alkylbenzene lubricant having a kinematic viscosity of 57 cs at 40° C. The Zerol) products are sold by the Shrieve Corporation. PVE 32 is a polyvinyl ether sold by Idemitsu Kosan having a kinematic viscosity of 32 cs at 40° C. Ucon LB-65 is a polyoxyproplyene glycol lubricant sold by Union Carbide with an average molecular weight of about 340. Ucon 50-HB-100 is a lubricant containing equal amounts of oxyethylene and oxpropylene groups sold by Union Carbide with an average molecular weight of about 520. Ucon 488 is a Union Carbide product having a kinematic viscosity of 130 cs at 40° C. Suniso® 3 GS (sometimes herein abbreviated as “3 GS”) is a napthenic mineral oil with a kinematic viscosity of 33 cs at 40° C., Suniso® 4GS (sometimes herein abbreviated as “4GS”) is a napthenic mineral oil with a kinematic viscosity of 62 cs at 40° C. The Suniso® products are sold by Crompton Corporation. HAB 22 has a kinematic viscosity of 22 cs at 40° C. and is a branched alkylbenzene oil sold by Nippon Oil.


HCFC-22 is chlorodifluoromethane. HFC-134a is 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane. R401A is a refrigerant blend containing 53 wt % HCFC-22, 13 wt % HFC-152a (1,1-difluoroethane) and 34 wt % HCFC-124 (2-chloro-1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane). R404A is a refrigerant blend containing 44 wt % HFC-125 (pentafluoroethane), 52 wt % HFC-143a (1,1,1-trifluoroethane) and 4 wt % HFC-134a. R407C is a refrigerant blend containing 23 wt % HFC-32 (difluoromethane), 25 wt % HFC-125 and 52 wt % HFC-134a. R410A is a refrigerant blend containing 50 wt % HFC-32 and 50 wt % HFC-125.


Abbreviations used herein for a number of materials are shown in the table below with the corresponding material name, and if relevant, formula and molecular weight:


















Molecular


Abbreviation
Material
Formula
Weight







BnB
Butylene glycol n-butyl ether
C4H9OCH2CHOHCH2CH3
146


PnB
Propylene glycol n-butyl ether
C4H9OCH2CHOHCH3
132


DPnB
Dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether
C4H9O[CH2CH(CH3)O]2H
190


TPnB
Tripropylene glycol n-butyl ether
C4H9O[CH2CH(CH3)O]3H
248


PnP
Propylene glycol n-propyl ether
C3H7OCH2CHOHCH3
118


DPnP
Dipropylene glycol n-propyl ether
C3H7O[CH2CH(CH3)O]2H
176


DPM
Dipropylene glycol methyl ether
CH3O[CH2CH(CH3)O]2H
148


DMM
Dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether
CH3O[CH2CH(CH3)O]2CH3
162


PGH
Propylene glycol hexyl ether
C6H13OCH2CHOHCH3
160


EGO
Ethylene glycol octyl ether
C8H17OCH2CH2OH
174


PTB
Propylene glycol t-butyl ether
C(CH3)3OCH(CH3)CH2OH
132


1,5-DMPD
1,5-dimethyl piperidone
C7H13NO
127


DMPD
Mixture of 70 wt % 1,3- and 30 wt %
C7H13NO
127



1,5-dimethyl piperid-2-one


OP
1-octyl pyrrolidin-2-one
C12H23NO
197


DBE-IB
Diisobutyl dibasic esters (e.g. diisobutyl
(CH3)2CHCH2OOC(CH2)24
242 avg.



esters of succinic, glutaric and adipic acids)
OCOCH2CH(CH3)2









Example 1

Polyoxyalkylene glycol ether compatibilizers of the present invention were placed in a suitable container with refrigerant and lubricant and the temperature was lowered until two phases were observed to the naked eye (i.e., the phase separation temperature, also herein referred to as “PST”). The composition in the container was 50 wt % HFC-134a, 25 wt % Zerol 150 and 25 wt % of compatibilizer. Results are shown below, and in FIG. 1.


Example 1
















Phase





Separation
Carbon/




Temperature
Oxygen


Compatibilizer
Formula
(° C.)
Ratio


















Ethylene glycol butyl ether
C6H14O2
4
3.0


Ethylene glycol diethyl ether
C6H14O2
5
3.0


Ethylene glycol hexyl ether
C10H22O2
26
4.0


Dipropylene glycol methyl ether
C7H16O3
27
2.33


Dipropylene glycol propyl ether
C9H20O3
5.5
3.0


Propylene glycol butyl ether
C7H16O2
6
3.5


Propylene glycol propyl ether
C6H14O2
11
3.0


Tripropylene glycol butyl ether
C13H28O4
11
3.25


Propylene glycol dimethyl ether
C5H12O2
12
2.5


Tripropylene glycol propyl ether
C12H26O4
12
3.0


Dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether
C8H18O3
13
2.67


Dipropylene glycol butyl ether
C10H22O3
13
3.33


Diethylene glycol butyl ether
C8H18O3
13
2.7


Butylene glycol n-butyl ether
C8H18O2
16
4


Dibutylene glycol n-butyl ether
C12H26O3
18
4


Propylene glycol t-butyl ether
C7H16O2
20
3.5







Comparative Data










Tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether
C10H22O5
32
2.0


Ucon LB-65
polyalkylene
28
3.0



glycol


Ucon 50-HB-100
polyalkylene
32
2.5



glycol


PVE 32
polyvinyl ether
62
5


Dipropylene glycol
C6H14O3
not miscible
2




with Zerol 150










The data show significantly lower phase separation temperatures versus 50 wt % HFC-134a/50 wt % Zerol 150 alkylbenzene lubricant which has a phase separation temperature of 137° C. The data show that a minimum phase separation temperature occurs at a specific carbon to oxygen ratio of the polyoxyalkylene glycol ether compatibilizer indicating maximum solubility improvement of hydrofluorocarbon refrigerant in alkylbenzene lubricant.


Example 2

Polyoxyalkylene glycol ether compatibilizers of the present invention were placed in a suitable container with refrigerant and lubricant and the temperature lowered until two phases were observed. The composition in the container was 50 wt % R401A refrigerant, 40 wt % Suniso 3GS and 10 wt % of a polyoxyalkylene glycol ether compatibilizer. Results are shown below, and in FIG. 2.


Example 2
















Phase





Separation
Carbon/




Temperature
Oxygen


Compatibilizer
Formula
(° C.)
Ratio


















Propylene glycol hexyl ether
C9H20O2
−26
4.5


Butylene glycol butyl ether
C8H18O2
−19
4.0


Ethylene glycol octyl ether
C10H22O2
−18
5.0


Propylene glycol butyl ether
C7H16O2
 −7
3.5


Dipropylene glycol
C10H22O3
−11
3.33


butyl ether


Tripropylene glycol butyl ether
C13H28O4
 −7
3.25







Comparative Data










Tetraglyme
C10H22O5
not miscible
2.0




with 3GS










The data show significantly lower phase separation temperature versus 50 wt % R401A refrigerant/50 wt % Suniso 3GS mineral oil, which has a phase separation temperature of 24° C. The data show that a minimum phase separation temperature occurs at a specific carbon to oxygen ratio of the polyoxyalkylene glycol ether compatibilizer, indicating maximum solubility improvement of hydrochlorofluorocarbon-containing refrigerant in mineral oil lubricant.


Butyl phenyl ether (C10H14O), an aryl ether compatibilizer, was also measured and showed a surprisingly low phase separation temperature of −32° C.


Example 3

Ketone compatibilizers of the present invention were placed in a suitable container with refrigerant and lubricant and the temperature lowered until two phases were observed. The composition in the container was 50 wt % HFC-134a, 25 wt % Zerol 150 and 25 wt % of a ketone compatibilizer. Results are shown below, and in FIG. 3.


Example 3



















Phase






Separation
Carbon/





Temperature
Oxygen



Compatibilizer
Formula
(° C.)
Ratio





















Cycloheptanone
C7H12O
−24
7



2-Nonanone
C9H18O
−22
9



3-Octanone
C8H16O
−17
8



Cyclohexanone
C6H10O
−16
6



2-Heptanone
C7H14O
−15
7



2-Decanone
C10H20O
−15
10



4-Decanone
C10H20O
−14
10



2-Octanone
C8H16O
−12
8



5-Nonanone
C9H18O
−12
9



4-Ethylcyclohexanone
C8H14O
−12
8



3-Heptanone
C7H14O
−8
7



Diisobutyl ketone
C9H18O
−4
9



2-Decalone
C10H16O
2
10



Methyl propyl ketone
C5H10O
3
5



Acetophenone
C8H8O
4
8



Butyrophenone
C10H12O
8
10



2-tridecanone
C13H26O
8
13



Methyl ethyl ketone
C4H8O
16
4



Dihexylketone
C13H26O
21
13



Hexanophenone
C13H18O
28
13



Dicyclohexyl ketone
C13H22O
53
13







Comparative Data












Acetone
C3H6O
56
3










The data show significantly lower phase separation temperatures versus 50 wt % HFC-134a/50 wt % Zerol 150 alkylbenzene lubricant which has a phase separation temperature of 137° C. The data show that a minimum phase separation temperature occurs at a specific carbon to oxygen ratio of the ketone compatibilizer indicating maximum solubility improvement of hydrofluorocarbon refrigerant in alkylbenzene lubricant.


Example 4

Nitrile compatibilizers of the present invention were placed in a suitable container with refrigerant and lubricant and the temperature lowered until two phases were observed. The composition in the container was 50 wt % HFC-134a, 25 wt % Zerol 150 and 25 wt % of a nitrile compound. Results are shown below, and in FIG. 4.


Example 4



















Phase






Separation
Carbon/





Temperature
Nitrogen



Compatibilizer
Formula
(° C.)
Ratio





















1-cyanooctane
C9H17N
−26
9



2-cyanooctane
C9H17N
−23
9



1-cyanoheptane
C8H15N
−18
8



1-cyanodecane
C11H21N
−13
11



2-cyanodecane
C11H21N
−12
11



1-cyanopentane
C6H11N
−3
6



1-cyanoundecane
C12H23N
3
12










The data show significantly lower phase separation temperatures versus 50 wt % HFC-134a/50 wt % Zerol 150 alkylbenzene lubricant which has a phase separation temperature of 137° C. The data show that a minimum phase separation temperature occurs at a specific carbon to nitrogen ratio of the nitrile compatibilizer indicating solubility improvement of hydrofluorocarbon refrigerant in alkylbenzene lubricant.


Example 5

Chlorocarbon compatibilizers of the present invention were placed in a suitable container with refrigerant and lubricant and the temperature lowered until two phases were observed. The composition in the container was 50 wt % HFC-134a, 25 wt % Zerol 150 and 25 wt % of a chlorocarbon compatibilizer. Results are shown below, and in FIG. 5.


Example 5
















Phase





Separation
Carbon/




Temperature
Chlorine


Compatibilizer
Formula
(° C.)
Ratio


















1-chlorobutane
C4H9Cl
16
4


3-(chloromethyl)pentane
C6H13Cl
34
6


1-chloroheptane
C7H15Cl
40
7


1,6-dichlorohexane
C6H12Cl2
47
3


1-chlorooctane
C8H17Cl
54
8


1-chlorohexane
C6H13Cl
38
6


3-chloro-3-methylpentane
C6H13Cl
23
6









The data show significantly lower phase separation versus 50 wt % HFC-134a/50 wt % Zerol 150 alkylbenzene lubricant which has a phase separation temperature of 137° C. The data show that a minimum phase separation temperature occurs at a specific carbon to chlorine ratio of the chlorocarbon compatibilizer indicating maximum solubility improvement of hydrofluorocarbon refrigerant in alkylbenzene lubricant.


Example 6

Chlorocarbon compatibilizers of the present invention were placed in a suitable container with refrigerant and lubricant and the temperature lowered until two phases were observed. The composition in the container was 50 wt % R401A refrigerant, 40 wt % Suniso 3GS and 10 wt % chlorocarbon compatibilizer. Results are shown below and in FIG. 6.


Example 6
















Phase





Separation
Carbon/




Temperature
Chlorine


Compatibilizer
Formula
(° C.)
Ratio


















3-(chloromethyl)pentane
C6H13Cl
−25
6


1-chloroheptane
C7H15Cl
−24
7


C6&C8 monochlorides,

−17
6-8


1:2 weight ratio


1,6-dichlorohexane
C6H12Cl2
−14
3


1-chlorooctane
C8H17Cl
−13
8


1-chlorohexane
C6H13Cl
−10
6


3-chloro-3-methylpentane
C6H13Cl
−10
6


1-chlorononane
C9H19Cl
−7
9







Comparative Data










Chlorowax 5760
C13H22-
79
2.2



Cl6









The data show significantly lower phase separation versus 50 wt % R401A refrigerant/50 wt % Suniso 3GS mineral oil which has a phase separation temperature of 24° C. The data show that a minimum phase separation temperature occurs at a specific carbon to chlorine ratio of the chlorocarbon compatibilizer indicating maximum solubility of hydrochlorofluorocarbon-containing refrigerant in mineral oil lubricant. Also, Chlorowax 5760 has an unacceptably high PST at 79° C.


Example 7

Amide compatibilizers of the present invention were placed in a suitable container with refrigerant and lubricant and the temperature lowered until two phases were observed. The composition in the container was either HFC-134a or R401A refrigerants, Zerol 150 or Suniso 3GS lubricants, and an amide compatibilizer. Results are shown below and in FIGS. 7 and 8.


Example 7

















PST (° C.)
PST (° C.)





25% Zerol 150
40% 3GS
Carbon




25%
10%
to




Compatibilizer
Compatibilizer
Oxygen


Compatibilizer
Formula
50% HFC-134a
50% R401A
Ratio



















1-octyl pyrrolidin-2-one
C12H23NO
−25
−34
12


1-heptyl-5-methylpyrrolidin-2-one
C12H23NO
−18

12


1-octyl-5-methyl pyrrolidin-2-one
C13H25NO
−17

13


1-butylcaprolactam
C10H19NO
−17

10


1-cyclohexylpyrrolidin-2-one
C10H17NO
−15
−27
10


1-butyl-5-methylpiperidone
C10H19NO
−13
−20
10


isobutylcaprolactam
C10H19NO
−11

10


1-cyclohexyl-5-methylpyrrolidin-
C11H19NO
−10

11


2-one


1-pentyl-5-methyl piperidone
C11H21NO
−10
−25
11


1-hexyl caprolactam
C12H23NO
−10

12


1-hexyl-5-methylpyrrolidin-2-one
C11H21NO
−10

11


1-nonyl-5-methylpyrrolidin-2-one
C14H27NO
−6

14


1,3-dimethyl piperidone
C7H13NO
−9

7


DMPD
C7H13NO
−6

7


1-decyl-2-pyrrolidin-2-one
C14H27NO
−4

14


1,1-dibutylformamide
C9H19NO
−2
−16
9


1-methyl caprolactam
C7H13NO
−1
−31
7


1-butyl pyrrolidin-2-one
C8H15NO
−1
 −4
8


1-decyl-5-methylpyrrolidin-2-one
C15H29NO
2

15


1,5-dimethyl piperidone
C7H13NO
2
−15
7


1-dodecyl pyrrolidin-2-one
C16H31NO
8
−38
16


1,1-diisopropyl acetamide
C8H17NO
13
 4
8


1-undecyl-5-methylpyrrolidin-2-
C16H31NO
13

16


one


1-dodecyl-5-methylpyrrolidin-2-
C17H33NO
16

17


one


N-phenylethylcaprolactam
C14H19NO
20

14


N-phenylpropylcaprolactam
C15H21NO
20

15









The data show significantly lower phase separation temperatures for both hydrofluorocarbon and hydrochlorofluorocarbon-containing refrigerant/lubricant systems versus 50 wt % HFC-134a/50 wt % Zerol 150 which has a phase separation temperature of 137° C., and 50 wt % R401A refrigerant/50 wt % Suniso 3GS which has a phase separation temperature of 24° C. The minimum phase separation temperature for amide compatibilizers with HFC-134a and Zerol 150 occurs at a specific carbon to amide oxygen ratio indicating a maximum solubility improvement for hydrofluorocarbon refrigerants and alkylbenzene lubricant. The phase separation temperature for amide compatibilizers with R401A refrigerant and Suniso 3GS mineral oil lubricant decreases with increasing carbon to amide oxygen ratio.


Example 8

Polyoxyalkylene glycol ether compatibilizers of the present invention were placed in a suitable container with refrigerant and lubricant and the temperature was lowered until two phases were observed. The composition in the container was 25 wt % Zerol 150, 25 wt % of compatibilizer and 50% of either HFC-32, HFC-125 or R410A refrigerants. Results are shown below, and in FIG. 9.


Example 8



















PST with
PST with
Carbon/




PST with
HFC-125
R410A
Oxygen


Compatibilizer
Formula
HFC-32 (° C.)
(° C.)
(° C.)
Ratio




















Ethylene glycol dimethyl ether
C4H10O2
29
27 
12
2.0


Propylene glycol dimethyl ether
C5H12O2
23
7
 6
2.5


Ethylene glycol diethyl ether
C6H14O2
16
3
−1
3.0


Propylene glycol butyl ether
C7H16O2
25
2
 9
3.5


Butylene glycol n-butyl ether
C8H18O2

6

4










The data show an unexpected and generally lower phase separation temperature when HFC-32 and HFC-125 refrigerants are combined to form R410A refrigerant versus neat HFC-32 or HFC-125.


Example 9

Aryl ether, 1,1,1-trifluoroalkane and fluoroether compatibilizers of the present invention were placed in a suitable container with refrigerant and lubricant and the temperature lowered until two phases were observed. The composition in the container was 50 wt % HFC-134a refrigerant, 25 wt % Zerol 150 alkylbenzene lubricant and 25 wt % of compatibilizer. Results are shown below.


Example 9
















PST (° C.)
PST (° C.)




25% Zerol 150
40% 3GS




25%
10%




Compatibilizer
Compatibilizer


Compatibilizer
Formula
50% HFC-134a
50% R401A







methoxybenzene
C7H8O
13



1,3-dimethoxybenzene
C8H10O2
15



ethoxybenzene
C8H10O
20



1,1,1-trifluorododecane
C12H23F3
27
−28


1,1,1-trifluorohexane
C6H11F3
32



C8H17OCF2CF2H
C10H18F4O
21
−12


C6H13OCF2CF2H
C8H14F4O
27
−11










The data show significantly lower phase separation temperatures for these compatibilizers with both hydrofluorocarbon and hydrochlorofluorocarbon-containing refrigerants versus 50 wt % HFC-134a/50 wt % Zerol 150, which has a phase separation temperature of 137° C., and 50 wt % R401A refrigerant/50 wt % Suniso 3GS, which has a phase separation temperature of 24° C.


Examples 10-28

A test tube was filled with 7.5 grams of HFC-43-10 mee (CF3CF2CHFCHFCF3), herein referred to as “4310”, and 2.5 grams of selected lubricant. Compatibilizers of the present invention were added in 1 gram increments to the 4310/lubricant mixture and the contents of the tube were agitated at 25° C. Changes in phase levels were recorded and compositions of layers analyzed by gas chromatography. One gram increments of compatibilizer were added until the contents of the tube reached one homogeneous phase. Results are shown below.


Example 10
















Grams of
Total

Bottom




DPM added
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
wt %







0
75.0% 4310
20
35
  —
  —



25.0% Zerol 150


1
 9.1% DPM
21
41
 5% DPM
11% DPM



68.2% 4310


 7% 4310
85% 4310



22.7% Zerol 150


88% Zerol 150
 4% Zerol 150


2
16.7% DPM
20
49
 9% DPM
21% DPM



62.5% 4310


 9% 4310
73% 4310



20.8% Zerol 150


82% Zerol 150
 6% Zerol 150


3
23.1% DPM
18
59
10% DPM
29% DPM



57.7% 4310


 7% 4310
63% 4310



19.2% Zerol 150


83% Zerol 150
 8% Zerol 150


4
28.6% DPM
14
71
18% DPM
35% DPM



53.6% 4310


11% 4310
53% 4310



17.8% Zerol 150


71% Zerol 150
12% Zerol 150


5
33.3% DPM
 5
87
24% DPM
37% DPM



50.0% 4310


14% 4310
45% 4310



16.7% Zerol 150


62% Zerol 150
18% Zerol 150


6
37.5% DPM


one layer
one layer



46.9% 4310



15.6% Zerol 150









Example 11
















Grams of
Total

Bottom




PnB added
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %







0
75.0% 4310
21
34
  —
  —



25.0% Zerol 150


1
 9.1% D PnB
23
40
19% PnB
 8% PnB



68.2% 4310


15% 4310
89% 4310



22.7% Zerol 150


66% Zerol 150
 3% Zerol 150


2
16.7% PnB
25
47
31% PnB
17% PnB



62.5% 4310


25% 4310
79% 4310



20.8% Zerol 150


44% Zerol 150
 4% Zerol 150


3
23.1% PnB
23
57
35% PnB
25% PnB



57.7% 4310


35% 4310
69% 4310



19.2% Zerol 150


30% Zerol 150
 6% Zerol 150


4
28.6% PnB


one layer
one layer



53.6% 4310



17.8% Zerol 150









Example 12
















Grams of
Total

Bottom




DPnB added
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %







0
75.0% 4310
21
34
  —
  —



25.0% Zerol 150


1
 9.1% DPnB
23
40
14% DPnB
 7% DPnB



68.2% 4310


13% 4310
88% 4310



22.7% Zerol 150


72% Zerol 150
 5% Zerol 150


2
16.7% DPnB
26
45
25% DPnB
15% DPnB



62.5% 4310


18% 4310
79% 4310



20.8% Zerol 150


57% Zerol 150
 6% Zerol 150


3
23.1% DPnB
27
51
35% DPnB
24% DPnB



57.7% 4310


29% 4310
68% 4310



19.2% Zerol 150


36% Zerol 150
 8% Zerol 150


4
28.6% DPnB


one layer
one layer



53.6% 4310



17.8% Zerol 150









Example 13
















Grams of
Total

Bottom




TPnB added
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %







0
75.0% 4310
21
34
  —
  —



25.0% Zerol 150


1
 9.1% TPnB
24
40
29% TPnB
 6% TPnB



68.2% 4310


23% 4310
93% 4310



22.7% Zerol 150


48% Zerol 150
 1% Zerol 150


2
16.7% TPnB
27
44
33% TPnB
14% TPnB



62.5% 4310


25% 4310
84% 4310



20.8% Zerol 150


42% Zerol 150
 2% Zerol 150


3
23.1% TPnB
30
48
32% TPnB
19% TPnB



57.7% 4310


33% 4310
77% 4310



19.2% Zerol 150


35% Zerol 150
 4% Zerol 150


4
28.6% TPnB


one layer
one layer



53.6% 4310



17.8% Zerol 150









Example 14
















Grams of
Total

Bottom




PnP added
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %







0
75.0% 4310
21
34
  —
  —



25.0% Zerol 150


1
 9.1% PnP
21
41
17% PnP
 9% PnP



68.2% 4310


15% 4310
89% 4310



22.7% Zerol 150


68% Zerol 150
 2% Zerol 150


2
16.7% PnP
23
48
27% PnP
18% PnP



62.5% 4310


22% 4310
74% 4310



20.8% Zerol 150


51% Zerol 150
 8% Zerol 150


3
23.1% PnP
20
59
29% PnP
26% PnP



57.7% 4310


25% 4310
68% 4310



19.2% Zerol 150


46% Zerol 150
 6% Zerol 150


4
28.6% PnP


one layer
one layer



53.6% 4310



17.8% Zerol 150









Example 15
















Grams of
Total

Bottom




DPnP added
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %







0
75.0% 4310
21
34
  —
  —



25.0% Zerol 150


1
 9.1% DPnP
22
41
 8% DPnP
 8% DPnP



68.2% 4310


 7% 4310
87% 4310



22.7% Zerol 150


85% Zerol 150
 5% Zerol 150


2
16.7% DPnP
23
47
16% DPnP
17% DPnP



62.5% 4310


12% 4310
76% 4310



20.8% Zerol 150


72% Zerol 150
 7% Zerol 150


3
23.1% DPnP
22
56
27% DPnP
24% DPnP



57.7% 4310


19% 4310
67% 4310



19.2% Zerol 150


54% Zerol 150
 9% Zerol 150


4
28.6% DPnP


one layer
one layer



53.6% 4310



17.8% Zerol 150









Example 16
















Grams of
Total

Bottom




DMM added
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %




















0
75.0% 4310
21
34
  —
  —



25.0% Zerol 150


1
 9.1% DMM
22
40
 8% DMM
 9% DMM



68.2% 4310


11% 4310
90% 4310



22.7% Zerol 150


81% Zerol 150
 1% Zerol 150


2
16.7% DMM
23
47
16% DMM
16% DMM



62.5% 4310


14% 4310
82% 4310



20.8% Zerol 150


70% Zerol 150
 2% Zerol 150


3
23.1% DMM
22
55
24% DMM
21% DMM



57.7% 4310


21% 4310
72% 4310



19.2% Zerol 150


55% Zerol 150
 7% Zerol 150


4
28.6% DMM
 4
81
33% DMM
29% DMM



53.6% 4310


37% 4310
55% 4310



17.8% Zerol 150


30% Zerol 150
16% Zerol 150


5
33.3% DMM


one layer
one layer



50.0% 4310



16.7% Zerol 150









Example 17











In this example, DIP = equal parts by weight of PnB, DPnB and Isopar H.













Total

Bottom




Grams of DIP
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


added to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %





0
75.0% 4310
21
34
  —
  —



25.0% Zerol 150


1
 3.0% PnB
26
37
 6% PnB
 3% PnB



 3.0% Isopar(R)H


16% Isopar(R)H
 1% Isopar(R)H



 3.0% DPnB


 6% DPnB
 3% DPnB



68.2% 4310


17% 4310
91% 4310



22.7% Zerol 150


55% Zerol 150
 2% Zerol 150


2
 5.6% PnB
30
41
11% PnB
 5% PnB



 5.6% Isopar(R)H


24% Isopar(R)H
 2% Isopar(R)H



 5.6% DPnB


11% DPnB
 5% DPnB



62.5% 4310


29% 4310
86% 4310



20.8% Zerol 150


25% Zerol 150
 2% Zerol 150


3
 7.7% PnB
36
43
11% PnB
 7% PnB



 7.7% Isopar(R)H


19% Isopar(R)H
 4% Isopar(R)H



 7.7% DPnB


11% DPnB
 8% DPnB



57.7% 4310


29% 4310
77% 4310



19.2% Zerol 150


30% Zerol 150
 4% Zerol 150


4
 9.5% PnB
44
44
10% PnB
 9% PnB



 9.5% Isopar(R)H


14% Isopar(R)H
 7% Isopar(R)H



 9.5% DPnB


11% DPnB
10% DPnB



53.6% 4310


30% 4310
64% 4310



17.8% Zerol 150


35% Zerol 150
10% Zerol 150


5
11.1% PnB


one layer
one layer



11.1% Isopar(R)H



11.1% DPnB



50.0% 4310



16.7% Zerol 150









Example 18











In this example, 2-heptanone is referred to as “A”.













Total

Bottom




Grams of A
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


added to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %





0
75.0% 4310
19
34





25.0% 3GS


1
 9.1% A
20
42
 3.2% A
 9.8% A



68.2% 4310


 3.2% 4310
86.4% 4310



22.7% 3GS


92.9% 3GS
 3.8% 3GS


2
16.7% A
19
52
 7.6% A
16.9% A



62.5% 4310


 6.7% 4310
77.7% 4310



20.8% 3GS


85.7% 3GS
 5.4% 3GS


3
23.1% A
15
64
10.8% A
23.2% A



57.7% 4310


10.6% 4310
63.7% 4310



19.2% 3GS


78.6% 3GS
13.1% 3GS


4
28.6% A


one layer
one layer



53.6% 4310



17.8% 3GS









Example 19











In this example, 5-methyl-2-hexanone is referred to as “A”.











Grams of A







Total Composition
Heights of both
Composition -
Composition -


added to Tube
in Tube
layer
top layer
bottom layer















0
  75% 4310
Top -
19 mm
  —
  —



  25% 3GS
Bottom -
34 mm


1
 9.1% A
Top -
21 mm, clear
 3.0% A
10.3% A



68.2% 4310
Bottom -
42 mm, clear
 3.4% 4310
87.9% 4310



22.7% 3GS


93.6% 3GS
 1.8% 3GS


2
16.7% A
Top -
19 mm, clear
 8.9% A
18.2% A



62.5% 4310
Bottom -
51 mm, clear
 6.9% 4310
78.6% 4310



20.8% 3GS


84.2% 3GS
 3.2% 3GS


3
23.1% A
Top -
16 mm, clear
10.8% A
23.7% A



57.7% 4310
Bottom -
62 mm, clear
 7.9% 4310
62.9% 4310



19.2% 3GS


81.3% 3GS
13.4% 3GS


4
28.6% A
Top -
10 mm, clear
13.6% A
25.8% A



53.6% 4310
Bottom -
78 mm, clear
 9.9% 4310
59.2% 4310



17.8% 3GS


76.5% 3GS
15.0% 3GS


4.5
31.0% A
Top -
 3 mm, clear
27.0% A
29.8% A



51.7% 4310
Bottom -
90 mm, clear
14.1% 4310
50.0% 4310



17.3% 3GS


58.9% 3GS
20.2% 3GS











5
33.3% A
Clear one layer -
  —
  —



50.0% 4310
97 mm



16.7% 3GS









Example 20
















Grams of
Total

Bottom




Isopar H added
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %







0
75.0% 4310
19
34
  —
  —



25.0% 3GS


1
 9.1% Isopar(R)H
29
34
31.4% Isopar(R)H
 5.4% Isopar(R)H



68.2% 4310


 0.4% 4310
93.9% 4310



22.7% 3GS


68.2% 3GS
 0.7% 3GS


2
16.7% Isopar(R)H
37
34
45.7% Isopar(R)H
 8.2% Isopar(R)H



62.5% 4310


 1.0% 4310
90.7% 4310



20.8% 3GS


53.3% 3GS
 1.0% 3GS


3
23.1% Isopar(R)H
46
34
56.8% Isopar(R)H
 9.5% Isopar(R)H



57.7% 4310


 1.9% 4310
89.6% 4310



19.2% 3GS


41.3% 3GS
 0.9% 3GS


4
28.6% Isopar(R)H
57
33
62.9% Isopar(R)H
10.5% Isopar(R)H



53.6% 4310


 2.9% 4310
88.6% 4310



17.8% 3GS


34.2% 3GS
 0.9% 3GS


5
33.3% Isopar(R)H
66
33
69.0% Isopar(R)H
11.6% Isopar(R)H



50.0% 4310


 3.3% 4310
87.7% 4310



16.7% 3GS


27.7% 3GS
 0.7% 3GS


10 
Never Reached


  —
  —



one phase









Example 21











In this example, PDD = equal parts by weight of PnB, DMM and DPnB.













Total

Bottom




Grams of PDD
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


added to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %





0
75.0% 4310
21
34
  —
  —



25.0% Zerol 150


1
 3.0% PnB
23
39
 5% PnB
 3% PnB



 3.0% DMM


 4% DMM
 3% DMM



 3.0% DPnB


 5% DPnB
 3% DPnB



68.2% 4310


14% 4310
87% 4310



22.7% Zerol 150


72% Zerol 150
 4% Zerol 150


2
 5.6% PnB
24
46
 6% PnB
 6% PnB



 5.6% DMM


 5% DMM
 6% DMM



 5.6% DPnB


 6% DPnB
 6% DPnB



62.5% 4310


15% 4310
76% 4310



20.8% Zerol 150


68% Zerol 150
 6% Zerol 150


3
 7.7% PnB
23
55
11% PnB
 8% PnB



 7.7% DMM


10% DMM
 9% DMM



 7.7% DPnB


11% DPnB
 8% DPnB



57.7% 4310


24% 4310
63% 4310



19.2% Zerol 150


44% Zerol 150
12% Zerol 150


4
11.1% PnB


one layer
one layer



11.1% DMM



11.1% DPnB



50.0% 4310



16.7% Zerol 150









Example 22











In this example, DDN = equal parts by weight of DPnB, DMM and


Naptha 140 (“N140”).













Total

Bottom




Grams of DDN
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


added to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %





0
75.0% 4310
21
34
  —
  —



25.0% Zerol 150


1
 3.0% DPnB
25
38
 3% DPnB
 3% DPnB



 3.0% DMM


 3% DMM
 3% DMM



 3.0% N140


 9% N140
<1% N140



68.2% 4310


 8% 4310
93% 4310



22.7% Zerol 150


77% Zerol 150
 1% Zerol 150


2
 5.6% DPnB
29
42
 7% DPnB
 5% DPnB



 5.6% DMM


 6% DMM
 5% DMM



 5.6% N140


16% N140
 1% N140



62.5% 4310


12% 4310
87% 4310



20.8% Zerol 150


59% Zerol 150
 2% Zerol 150


3
 7.7% DPnB
34
45
 9% DPnB
 7% DPnB



 7.7% DMM


 8% DMM
 8% DMM



 7.7% N140


19% N140
 3% N140



57.7% 4310


17% 4310
80% 4310



19.2% Zerol 150


47% Zerol 150
 2% Zerol 150


4
9.5% DPnB
39
48
10% DPnB
 9% DPnB



 9.5% DMM


 9% DMM
10% DMM



 9.5% N140


18% N140
 5% N140



53.6% 4310


23% 4310
70% 4310



17.8% Zerol 150


40% Zerol 150
 6% Zerol 150


5
11.1% DPnB
43
52
11% DPnB
11% DPnB



11.1% DMM


11% DMM
11% DMM



11.1% N140


15% N140
9% N140



50.0% 4310


39% 4310
58% 4310



16.7% Zerol 150


24% Zerol 150
11% Zerol 150


6
12.5% DPnB


One Layer
One Layer



12.5% DMM



12.5% N140



46.9% 4310



15.6% Zerol 150









Example 23











In this example, DDA = equal parts by weight of DPnB, DMM and


Aromatic 150 (“A150”).













Total

Bottom




Grams of DDA
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


added to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %





0
75.0% 4310
21
34
  —
  —



25.0% Zerol 150


1
 3.0% DPnB
24
38
 5% DPnB
 2% DPnB



 3.0% DMM


 4% DMM
 5% DMM



 3.0% A150


13% A150
 1% A150



68.2% 4310


18% 4310
93% 4310



22.7% Zerol 150


60% Zerol 150
 2% Zerol 150


2
 5.6% DPnB
28
42
 6% DPnB
 5% DPnB



 5.6% DMM


 5% DMM
 5% DMM



 5.6% A150


12% A150
 2% A150



62.5% 4310


17% 4310
86% 4310



20.8% Zerol 150


60% Zerol 150
 2% Zerol 150


3
 7.7% DPnB
32
46
11% DPnB
 7% DPnB



 7.7% DMM


10% DMM
 8% DMM



 7.7% A150


20% A150
 4% A150



57.7% 4310


36% 4310
77% 4310



19.2% Zerol 150


23% Zerol 150
 4% Zerol 150


4
 9.5% DPnB
35
51
12% DPnB
 9% DPnB



 9.5% DMM


12% DMM
 9% DMM



 9.5% A150


18% A150
 7% A150



53.6% 4310


40% 4310
68% 4310



17.8% Zerol 150


18% Zerol 150
 7% Zerol 150


5
11.1% DPnB


One Layer
One Layer



11.1% DMM



11.1% A150



50.0% 4310



16.7% Zerol 150









Example 24











In this example, PD = 2 parts by wt PnB, 1 part DPnB.













Total

Bottom




Grams of PD
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


added to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %





0
75.0% 4310
21
34
  —
  —



25.0% Zerol 150


1
 9.1% PD
23
39
 8% PnB
 5% PnB



68.2% 4310


 4% DPnB
 2% DPnB



22.7% Zerol 150


12% 4310
91% 4310






76% Zerol 150
 2% Zerol 150


2
16.7% PD
25
44
14% PnB
10% PnB



62.5% 4310


 7% DPnB
 5% DPnB



20.8% Zerol 150


20% 4310
82% 4310






59% Zerol 150
 3% Zerol 150


3
23.1% PD
26
52
24% PnB
15% PnB



57.7% 4310


11% DPnB
 7% DPnB



19.2% Zerol 150


43% 4310
70% 4310






22% Zerol 150
 8% Zerol 150


4
28.6% PD


one layer
one layer



50.0% 4310



16.7% Zerol 150









Example 25











In this example, PD = 2 parts by wt PnB, 1 part DPnB.













Total

Bottom




Grams of PD
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


added to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %





0
75.0% 4310
21
34
  —
  —



25.0% 3GS


1
 9.1% PD
21
41
 7% PnB
 5% PnB



68.2% 4310


 4% DPnB
 2% DPnB



22.7% 3GS


10% 4310
91% 4310






79% 3GS
 2% 3GS


2
16.7% PD
21
48
16% PnB
11% PnB



62.5% 4310


 8% DPnB
 5% DPnB



20.8% 3GS


18% 4310
81% 4310






58% 3GS
 3% 3GS


3
23.1% PD
20
57
17% PnB
15% PnB



57.7% 4310


 9% DPnB
 8% DPnB



19.2% 3GS


18% 4310
71% 4310






56% 3GS
 6% 3GS


4
28.6% PD
16
69
18% PnB
17% PnB



50.0% 4310


 9% DPnB
 9% DPnB



16.7% 3GS


19% 4310
65% 4310






54% 3GS
 9% 3GS


5
33.3% PD


one layer
one layer



50.0% 4310



16.7% 3GS









Example 26











In this example, PD = 2 parts by wt PnB, 1 part DPnB.













Total

Bottom




Grams of PD
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


added to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %





0
75.0% 4310
21
34
  —
  —



25.0% HAB22


1
 9.1% PD
23
39
 7% PnB
 5% PnB



68.2% 4310


 4% DPnB
 2% DPnB



22.7% HAB22


14% 4310
91% 4310






75% HAB22
 2% HAB22


2
16.7% PD
25
45
15% PnB
11% PnB



62.5% 4310


 7% DPnB
 5% DPnB



20.8% HAB22


28% 4310
78% 4310






50% HAB22
 6% HAB22


3
23.1% PD


One Layer
One Layer



57.7% 4310



19.2% HAB22









Example 27
















Grams of
Total

Bottom




DMPD added
Composition in
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


to Tube
Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %







0
75.0% 4310
21
35
  —
  —



25.0% Zerol 150


1
 9.1% 1,5-DMPD
20
42
 3% 1,5-DMPD
 9% 1,5-DMPD



68.2% 4310


13% 4310
89% 4310



22.7% Zerol 150


84% Zerol 150
 2% Zerol 150


2
16.7% 1,5-DMPD
18
52
 9% 1,5-DMPD
18% 1,5-DMPD



62.5% 4310


18% 4310
77% 4310



20.8% Zerol 150


73% Zerol 150
 5% Zerol 150


3
23.1% 1,5-DMPD
 8
68
14% 1,5-DMPD
24% 1,5-DMPD



57.7% 4310


25% 4310
63% 4310



19.2% Zerol 150


61% Zerol 150
13% Zerol 150


4
28.6% 1,5-DMPD


One Layer
One Layer



50.0% 4310



16.7% Zerol 150









Example 28

















Total

Bottom




Grams of OP
Composition
Top Layer
Layer
Top Layer
Bottom Layer


added to Tube
in Tube
Height, mm
Height, mm
wt %
Wt %







0
75.0% 4310
21
34
  —
  —



25.0% Zerol 150


1
 9.1% OP
22
40
 7.8% OP
 6.4% OP



68.2% 4310


16.3% 4310
91.5% 4310



22.7% Zerol 150


75.9% Zerol 150
 2.1% Zerol 150


2
16.7% OP
19
51
14.7% OP
13.4% OP



62.5% 4310


32.6% 4310
79.3% 4310



20.8% Zerol 150


52.7% Zerol 150
 7.3% Zerol 150


3
23.1% OP


One Layer
One Layer



57.7% 4310



19.2% Zerol 150










Results show compatibilizers of the present invention improve the solubility between hydrofluorocarbons and conventional lubricants by drawing significant amounts of refrigerant (4310) into the lubricant phase (top layer), and lubricant (3GS or Zerol 150) into the refrigerant phase (bottom layer). The compatibilizers improve solubility significantly better than Isopar® H alone, which never reached one phase. The combination of PnB, DPnB and Isopar H surprisingly draws more 4310 into the lubricant phase (17%) than either PnB, DPnB or Isopar H alone (15%, 13% and 0.4%) respectively after one gram is added. A most preferred compatibilizer by this method is 1-octyl pyrrolidin-2-one, which required only 3 grams to reach one layer with Zerol 150 alkylbenzene lubricant.


Hexylene glycol was also tested as comparative data with HFC-4310mee and Zerol 150 but the solution remained two layers even after 10 grams of hexylene glycol was added.


Example 29

Lubricant return was tested in an lubricant-return apparatus as follows. Liquid refrigerant was fed from a pressurized cylinder through copper tubing to a heater where it was vaporized. The refrigerant vapor then passed through a pressure regulator and metering valve to control flow at a constant rate of 1,100 cc per minute and 101 kPa (1 atmosphere) pressure. The refrigerant vapor was fed to another copper tube 180 cm in length and 0.635 cm outer diameter formed into a U-shape and placed in a constant temperature bath. The U-shaped tube (U-tube) began with a straight vertical section 37 cm long then bent to a horizontal section 27 cm long at the bottom of the bath. The tube then rose vertically in a zigzag pattern with four 23 cm lengths, followed by another vertical straight section 23 cm long. The U-tube was filled with 10 grams of lubricant, optionally containing compatibilizer, which was added to the U-tube through the 37 cm vertical tube. Vapor refrigerant passed slowly through the lubricant in the U-tube. Refrigerant and lubricant exiting the U-tube was collected in a receiver and then the refrigerant allowed to evaporate from the lubricant. Lubricant was then weighed to determine how much lubricant was carried out of the U-tube by the refrigerant.


Refrigerant R407C was placed in the refrigerant cylinder. Suniso 3GS mineral oil, or Suniso 3GS oil and compatibilizers of the present invention were placed in the copper U-tube, wherein the combined lubricant and compatibilizer equaled 10 grams. The constant temperature bath was held at a temperature of −20° C. Refrigerant R407C vapor was fed through the U-tube at a flow rate of 1,100 cubic centimeters per minute and weight of lubricant in the receiver measured at 6, 10, and 20 minute time intervals. Data are shown below.


Example 29














Wt % Lubricant Returned










Lubricant Composition in U-tube
6 Min
10 Min
20 Min













6% 5-methyl-2-hexanone in 3GS
11.3
18.1
26.2


6% 2-Heptanone in 3GS
12.7
20.0
28.1







Comparative Data










POE 22
9.3
20.0
29.6


3GS
0
0
0


6% Isopar(R)H in 3GS
0
7.9
17.0









Results show the addition of 2-heptanone and 5-methyl-2-hexanone ketone compatibilizers to 3GS mineral oil shows significant improvement in lubricant return versus neat 3GS or Isopar H in 3GS.


Example 30

The apparatus and procedure of Example 29 was used to test refrigerant HFC-134a with Zerol 150 alkylbenzene lubricant, with and without compatibilizers. Results are shown below:


Example 30














Wt % Lubricant Returned










Lubricant Composition in U-tube
6 Min
10 Min
20 Min













10% PnB/5% DPnB in Zerol 150
15
24
34


10% PnB/5% DPnB/2% Syn-
17
25
36


0-Ad 8478*** in Zerol 150


10% PnB/5% DPnB/0.5%
16
25
36


BHT in Zerol 150


10% PnB/5%DPnB/1.5%
23
29
36


n-pentane in Zerol 150


10%PnB/5% DPnB/1.5%
21
30
39


n-octane in Zerol 150


10% PnB/5% DPnB/15%
15
27
38


PVE 32 in Zerol 150







Comparative Data










POE 22
16
27
36


Zerol 150
0
0
3


15% Ucon LB-65* in Zerol 150
0
4
19


15% Ucon 50-HB-100** in
0
0
7


Zerol 150





*Ucon LB-65 is a polyoxyproplyene glycol lubricant sold by Union Carbide with an average molecular weight of about 340.


**Ucon 50-HB-100 is a lubricant containing equal amounts of oxyethylene and oxpropylene groups sold by Union Carbide with an average molecular weight of about 520


***Syn-0-Ad 8478 is an alkylated triaryl phosphate ester produced by Akso Chemicals






Results show addition of polyoxyalkylene glycol ether compatibilizers, optionally with additional additives such as antiwear agents or hydrocarbons, significantly improve lubricant return of alkylbenzene lubricant and provide performance equivalent to POE 22 polyol ester lubricant. The comparative data shows higher molecular weight polyoxypropylene lubricants do not provide acceptable lubricant return.


Example 31

The apparatus and procedure of Example 29 was used to test refrigerant R404A with Zerol 150 alkyl benzene lubricant, with and without compatibilizers versus POE22 polyol ester lubricant. Results are shown below.


Example 31















Wt % Lubricant
Wt % Lubricant
Wt % Lubricant


Lubricant Composition in U-tube
Returned 6 Min
Returned 10 Min
Returned 20 Min


















35% 1-octyl pyrrolidin-2-one in Zerol 150
26
36
45


12% DMM in Zerol 150
18
26
35


 6% DMM/12% 1-octyl pyrrolidin-2-one/2%
13
23
34


Synergol in Zerol 150


20% 1,1-dibutyl formamide in Zerol 150
10
18
29


20% 1-methyl caprolactam in Zerol 150
12
24
36


17% 1,3-dimethyoxybenzene in Zerol 150
17
24
35







Comparative Data










POE 22
0
5
17


Zerol 150
0
0
<1









Results show addition of compatibilizers of the present invention to Zerol 150 provide significantly improved lubricant return versus polyol ester lubricant POE 22 polyol ester lubricant.


Example 32

The apparatus and procedure of Example 29 was used to test refrigerant HFC-134a with Zerol 150 alkyl benzene lubricant, with and without compatibilizers versus POE 22 polyol ester lubricant. Results are shown below.


Example 32















Wt % Lubricant
Wt % Lubricant
Wt % Lubricant


Lubricant Composition in U-tube
Returned 6 Min
Returned 10 Min
Returned 20 Min


















15% Cycloheptanone/1% Orange* in Zerol 150
27
35
42


15% 2-Nonanone/1% Orange* in Zerol 150
33
40
46


15% Diisobutyl ketone/1% Cinnamon* in
31
37
43


Zerol 150


20% DMPD in Zerol 150
32
38
44


20% Propylene glycol tert-butyl ether in
25
32
38


Zerol 150


15% cyanoheptane in Zerol 150
32
39
47







Comparative Data










POE 22
19
29
37


Zerol 150
0
0
7





*“Orange” and “Cinnamon” are fragrances sold by Intercontinental Fragrance






Results show addition of compatibilizers of the present invention to Zerol 150 provide lubricant return comparable to POE 22 polyol ester lubricant.


Example 33

The apparatus and procedure of Example 29 was used to test refrigerant R401A with Suniso 3GS mineral oil lubricant, with and without compatibilizers versus neat Zerol 150. Results are shown below.


Example 33
















Wt %
Wt %



Wt %
Lubricant
Lubricant


Lubricant Composition
Lubricant
Returned
Returned


in U-tube
Returned 6 Min
10 Min
20 Min


















10% Chlorooctane in 3GS
25
36
46


15% Chlorooctane in 3GS
35
43
50







Comparative Data










Zerol 150
0
12
38


3GS
0
0
5









Results show the addition of compatibilizers of the present invention to Suniso 3GS provide improved lubricant return versus Zerol 150.


Example 34

The apparatus and procedure of Example 29 was used to test refrigerant R410A with Zerol 150 alkyl benzene lubricant, with and without compatibilizers versus POE 22 polyol ester lubricant. Results are shown below.


Example 34















Wt % Lubricant
Wt % Lubricant
Wt % Lubricant


Lubricant Composition in U-tube
Returned 6 Min
Returned 10 Min
Returned 20 Min







15% PnB in Zerol 150
15 
26
33


15% DPnB in Zerol 150
9
17
26


15% TPnB in Zerol 150
0
10
19


15% PnP in Zerol 150
15 
22
32


 5% PnB/5% DPnB/5% Isopar H in Zerol 150
12 
19
29


 5% PnB/5% DPnB/5% Aromatic 150 in Zerol 150
15 
23
33







Comparative Data










POE 22
0
11
22


Zerol 150
0
 0
 1


15% Propylene Glycol in Zerol 150
*
*
*


15% Dipropylene glycol in Zerol 150
*
*
*


15% Ucon 50-HB100** in Zerol 150
0
 0
 6





*Not soluble in Zerol ® 150


**Polyalkylene glycol lubricant sold by Union Carbide with oxyethylene and oxypropylene groups with an average molecular weight of 520






Results show use of compatibilizers of the present invention in Zerol 150 provide comparable to improved lubricant return versus POE 22 polyol ester lubricant.


Examples 35-36

Tests were conducted to determine if refrigerant R410A could be used in an HCFC-22 Carrier heat pump (Model Tech 2000), using Zerol 150 alkylbenzene lubricant and compatibilizers of the present invention. The heat pump was outfitted with an R410A Copeland scroll compressor (ZP32K3E R-410) equipped with a sight glass and level tube in the lubricant sump. The fan-coil unit was installed in the indoor room of an environmental chamber and the outdoor unit was installed in the outdoor room. The two units were connected by 1.59 cm (⅝-inch) outer diameter copper tubing in the suction line and by 1.27 cm (½-inch) outer diameter copper tubing in the liquid line. The system was charged with 3,180 grams of refrigerant and 1,110 grams of lubricant containing compatibilizer. Refrigerant R410A with polyol ester lubricant was used as a baseline for comparison. Tests were conducted at ASHRAE cooling and low temperature heating conditions. For cooling the indoor room was controlled at 26.7° C. (80° F.) and 50% relative humidity, the outdoor room at 27.8° C. (82° F.) and 40% relative humidity. For low temperature heating, the indoor room was controlled at 21.1° C. (70° F.) and 57% relative humidity, the outdoor room at —8.3° C. (17° F.) and 60% relative humidity. The system was thoroughly flushed between runs to remove residual lubricant. Results from refrigerant side measurements are shown below.


Example 35
Cooling Test















Vol %





Lubricant
Capacity



Lost From
kB.t.u./hr


Lubricant Composition
Sump (cm)
(kW)
EER







15% PnB in Zerol 150
15%
2.91 (0.852)
11.29


20% PnB in Zerol 200TD
14%
2.90 (0.849)
11.30


20% DPnB in Zerol 150
20%
2.90 (0.849)
11.28


10% PnB/5% DPnB in Zerol 150
18%
2.93 (0.858)
11.61


10% PnB/5% DPnB in HAB22
18%
3.00 (0.878)
11.50


10% PnB/5% DPnB in 3GS
26%
2.92 (0.855)
11.08


18% PnB/10% DPnB in 4GS
23%
2.88 (0.843)
11.03


10% PnB/5% DPnB/15%
26%
2.92 (0.855)
11.14


HAB22 in 3GS


 5% PnB/5% DPnB/5% Isopar H
18%
2.94 (0.861)
11.48


in Zerol 150


 3% PnB/8% DPnB/4%
23%
2.95 (0.864)
11.25


Aromatic 150 in Zerol 150


 4% PnB/7% DPnB/4% DMM
20%
2.97 (0.870)
11.32


in Zerol 150


10% PnB/5% DPnB/1.5%
20%
3.10 (0.908)
11.70


Pentane in Zerol 150


10% PnB/5% DPnB/15% PVE
22%
3.00 (0.878)
11.67


32 in Zerol 150


10% PnB/5% DPnB/15% PVE
20%
2.95 (0.864)
11.40


32 in 3GS


 7% PnB/7% DPnB/7% TPnB
26%
2.92 (0.855)
11.18


in 3GS


15% BnB in 3GS
33%
2.91 (0.852)
11.17


20% PTB in 3GS
27%
2.92 (0.855)
11.28


10% PnB/5% DPnB/2.5%
15%
2.96 (0.867)
11.41


BTPP in Zerol 150







Comparative Data










POE 22
10%
2.98 (0.873)
11.70


POE 32
12%
2.97 (0.870)
11.48


Zerol 150
30%
2.86 (0.838)
10.97


Suniso 3GS
40%
2.86 (0.838)
10.82









Example 36
Low Temperature Heating Tests















Sump Lubricant
Capacity



Lubricant Composition
Level (cm)
kB.t.u/hr (kW)
EER


















10% PnB/5% DPnB in
4.6
20.2 (5.92)
8.38


Zerol 150


 3% PnB/8% DPnB/4%
4.4
20.4 (5.97)
8.45


Aromatic 150 in Zerol 150


10% PnB/5% DPnB in
4.9
20.4 (5.97)
8.42


HAB22


10% PnB/5% DPnB/2%
5.7
20.1 (5.89)
8.37


BTPP in Zerol 150


15% PVE32/10%
4.6
19.9 (5.83)
8.30


PnB/5% DPnB in 3GS


 5% PnB/5% DPnB/5%
4.7
20.2 (5.92)
8.35


Isopar H in Zerol 150







Comparative Data










POE 22
5.5
20.0 (5.86)
8.35


Zerol 150
4.3
19.3 (5.65)
8.00









Results show significant increases in lubricant return, energy efficiency and capacity when compatibilizers are added to Zerol 150, Suniso 3GS or 4GS and several cases with performance equivalent to or superior than polyol esters. There is also significant EER improvement during heating.


Example 37

The apparatus and procedure of Example 32 was used to test R410A refrigerant with compatibilizers of the present invention. Results for cooling are in the table below.


Example 37















Sump
Capacity




Lubricant
kB.t.u./hr


Lubricant Composition
Level (cm)
(kW)
EER







10% PnB/5% DPnB in Zerol 150
5.00
3.01 (0.882)
11.71


10% PnB/5% DPnB/1.5%
4.95
3.04 (0.890)
11.98


Pentane in Zerol 150







Comparative Data










POE 22
5.72
3.09 (0.905)
12.04


1.5% Pentane in Zerol 150
4.40
2.93 (0.858)
11.23









The data show that using only pentane provides inadequate lubricant return, capacity and energy efficiency. PnB/DPnB as compatibilizer provides increased performance and a combination PnB/DPnB/pentane as compatibilizer provides the best overall performance, including comparable EER with polyol ester lubricant POE22.


Example 38

The apparatus and procedure of Example 32 was used to test R410A refrigerant with compatibilizers of the present invention. In this test, however, the HCFC-22 evaporator was replaced with and R410A evaporator. Results for cooling are below.


Example 38















Sump





Lubricant
Capacity



Level
kB.t.u./hr


Lubricant Composition
(cm)
(kW)
EER







10% 2-heptanone/1% orange* in
5.33
3.17 (0.928)
11.87


Zerol 150


15% 2-nonanone/1% cinnamon* in
5.60
3.15 (0.923)
11.89


Zerol 150


20% DMPD in Zerol 150
5.70
3.15 (0.923)
11.92


10% PnB/10% DMPD in Zerol 150
5.50
3.16 (0.925)
11.94


20% 1,5-DMPD in Zerol 150
5.90
3.14 (0.920)
11.97







Comparative Data










POE 22
6.80
3.35 (0.981)
12.55


Zerol 150
4.27
3.07 (0.899)
11.30





*“Orange” and “Cinnamon” are fragrances sold by Intercontinental Fragrance






The data shows a significant improvement in capacity, energy efficiency and lubricant return using compatibilizers versus neat Zerol 150, even though the system had an HCFC-22 condenser and an R410A evaporator.


Example 39

Tests were conducted to determine if R410A refrigerant could be used in an R410A heat pump using Zerol 150 alkylbenzene lubricant and compatibilizers. The heat pump was outfitted a sight glass and level tube in the lubricant sump. The fan-coil unit was installed in the indoor room of an environmental chamber and the outdoor unit was installed in the outdoor room. The two units were connected by 1.59 cm (⅝-inch) outer diameter copper tubing in the suction line and by 1.27 cm (½-inch) outer diameter copper tubing in the liquid line. The system was charged with 3,860 grams of refrigerant and 1270 ml of lubricant containing compatibilizers of the present invention. Refrigerant R410A with POE 22 polyol ester lubricant was used as a baseline for comparison. Tests were conducted at ASHRAE cooling conditions. For cooling the indoor room was controlled at 26.7° C. (80° F.) and 50% relative humidity, the outdoor room at 27.8° C. (82° F.) and 40% relative humidity. The system was thoroughly flushed between runs to remove residual lubricant. Results from refrigerant side measurements are shown below.


Example 39
Cooling Test















Vol %





Lubricant
Capacity



Lost From
kB.t.u./hr


Lubricant Composition
Sump (cm)
(kW)
EER







10% PnB/5% DPnB in Zerol 150
16%
3.04 (0.890)
12.59


10% PnB/5% DPnB/ in Zerol
17%
3.05 (0.893)
12.67


150 with R410A + 0.5%


pentane


10% PnB/5% DPnB in Zerol
23%
3.03 (0.887)
13.06


150 with R410A + 0.5%


1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane


10% PnB/5% DPnB in Zerol
19%
3.04 ( )  
13.11


150 with R410A + 0.5% 1,1-


dichloro-1,1,1-trifluoroethane


12% DMM in Zerol 150
20%
3.04 (0.890)
12.88


11% Diisobutyl ketone/1%
21%
3.02 (0.884)
12.99


orange** in Zerol 150


11% 2-Nonanone/1%
20%
3.03 (0.887)
13.02


cinnamon** in Zerol 150


20% 1-octyl-pyrrolidin-2-one
18%
3.07 (0.899)
13.35


in Zerol 150


45% 1-octyl-pyrrolidin-2-one
13%
3.09 (0.905)
13.50


in Zerol 150


20% N-methylcaprolactam in
21%
3.11 (0.911)
13.56


Zerol 150







Comparative Data










POE 22
10%
3.09 (0.905)
13.54


Zerol 150*
38%
2.96 (0.867)
12.43





*Zerol 150 test was stopped before completion - compressor sump lubricant level became too low


**“Orange” and “Cinnamon” are fragrances sold by Intercontinental Fragrance







Results show improved lubricant return, capacity and efficiency when compatibilizers of the present invention are added to Zerol 150. Use of 1-octyl pyrrolidin-2-one amide compatibilizer shows performance equivalent to the POE 22 polyol ester lubricant baseline. A retrofit simulation was also conducted wherein the R410A heat pump was charged and operated with POE 22 then drained and charged with 45% 1-octyl-2-pyrrolidin-2-one in Zerol 150 without intermediate flushing. System efficiency and capacity were within 2% of the original POE 22 baseline.


Example 40

Tests were conducted to determine if HFC-134a refrigerant could be used in a domestic refrigerator (Whirlpool 21 cubic foot) using conventional lubricants Zerol 150 or Suniso 3GS and compatibilizers of the present invention. The refrigerator was outfitted with pressure and temperature measuring devices as well as power measurement to the hermetic reciprocating compressor and two fans. The compressor was also fitted with a sight glass to monitor lubricant level during operation. The refrigerator was tested in a room controlled at 27.8° C. and 40% relative humidity. The refrigerator was turned on and allowed to cool until the refrigerated compartment reached 3.3° C. The energy efficiency (COP) and capacity were then calculated using a thermodynamic model based on temperature, pressure and power inputs. The system was thoroughly flushed between runs to remove residual lubricant. In all tests, lubricant level was adequate indicating no lubricant return problems.


Example 40

















% Change in




Lubricant
Capacity
Capacity vs

% Change in


Composition
(Watts)
POE
COP
COP vs POE







10% PnB/5% DPnB
145
+1.4%
1.31
+8.3%


in Zerol 150


12% DMM in 3GS
143

1.33
+9.9%


12% DMM in Zerol 150
145
+1.4%
1.34
+10.7% 


 6% DMM in Zerol 100
148
+3.5%
1.30
+7.4%


20% OP in Zerol 100
145
+1.4%
1.30
+7.4%


45% OP in Zerol 300
146
+2.1%
1.32
+9.1%







Comparative Data











POE 22
143

1.21



Zerol 150
*
*
*
*


Zerol 75
146
+2.1%
1.25
+3.3%





*Evaporator was flooded and test could not be completed.







Results show a significant improvement in energy efficiency when compatibilizers of the present invention are used with conventional lubricants. Improvement is also shown when compared with using a low viscosity alkyl benzene lubricant (Zerol 75) alone. Capacities also showed improvement versus POE 22 polyol ester lubricant.


Example 41

Compatibilizers of the present invention were mixed with Zerol 150 and placed in shallow dishes in a 50% constant humidity chamber. Periodic samples of the compositions were taken and analyzed by Karl Fischer titration for water. Results are shown in ppm water versus polyol ester, polyvinyl ether and polyalkylene glycol lubricants.


Example 41





















Samples












Hours
0
2
3.5
5.5
21
26
45
50
69
74

























15% DIP in Zerol 150
77
108
124
154
318
351
402
392
401
375


10% PnB 5% DPnB in
112
137
209
242
506
533
538
661
756
708


Zerol 150







Comparative Data

















PVE32
185
398
505
785
1784
1917
2511
2451
2791
2630


Zerol 150
43
47
36
41
37
33
30
29
39
34


Ucon488
1175
1517
3123
4158
12114
12721
16741
18592
20133
19997


POE 22
153
165
173
181
693
733
1022
1096
1199
1165









Results show compatibilizer/lubricant compositions of the present invention absorb less water than polyol ester and significantly less water than polyvinyl ether and polyalkylene glycol lubricants. Since compatibilizer/lubricant compositions of the present invention do absorb some water, they also have lower risk of having free (immisicible) water available than Zerol 150. Free water can freeze in expansion devices and cause compressor failure.


Example 42

Compositions of the present invention were tested for thermal stability. Stainless steel, aluminum and copper coupons were placed in sealed glass tubes containing R410A refrigerant, Zerol 150 lubricant and compatibilizers of the present invention. In four cases, 1,000 ppm water was added. Tubes were held for 14 days at 175° C. Results are shown in the table below.


Example 42


















R410A/Zerol 150 + 5%
R407C/Zerol 100 + 20%
R410A/Zerol 150 + 10%
Comparative Data:


After 14 days
R410A/Zerol 150 +
DMM/5% DPnB/5% 140
1-octylpyrrolidin-2-one +
PnB/5% DPnB + 1000
R410A/POE 22 +


at 175° C.
15% PnB
Naptha + 1000 ppm H2O
1000 ppm H2O
ppm H2O
1000 ppm H2O







Copper Appearance
No observable changes
No observable changes
No observable changes
No observable changes
Corrosion and







discoloration observed


Aluminum Appearance
No observable changes
No observable changes
No observable changes
No observable changes
No observable changes


Steel Appearance
No observable changes
No observable changes
No observable changes
No observable changes
No observable changes


Acidity as HCl in ppm
<1  
<1  
<1
29  
577


R410A wt %
99.9
99.9
99.9
99.9
  99.8









Results show compositions of the present invention are thermally stable even in the presence of 1,000 ppm water, indicating no acid formation. Polyol ester lubricant in the presence of water caused corrosion of copper due to hydrolysis and acid formation.


Example 43

Volume resistivity was measured by ASTM D-1169 method using a Balsbaugh liquid test cell connected to a Keithley model 617 electrometer. A Keithley model 247 high voltage power supply was used as the excitation source. Capacitance used for calculating both resistivity and dielectric constant was measured with a GenRad model 1189 capacitance bridge. Results are shown below.


Example 43














Volume Resistivity



Composition
(Ohm × cm)
Dielectric Constant







Zerol 150/PnB/DPnB
9.12 × 1012
2.73


(85/10/5 wt %)


Zerol 150/PnB/DPnB/Isopar
1.73 × 1013
2.62


H (85/5/5/5 wt %)







Comparative Data









POE 22
5.50 × 1011
3.54










Results show compositions of the present invention have improved electrical properties versus POE 22 polyol ester lubricant. They show an increase in volume resistivity and a decrease in dielectric constant that improves electrical insulating properties and protects compressor electrical motor winding materials.


Example 44

Solubility and viscosity measurements were made for compositions of the present invention in Zerol 150 with R410A refrigerant. The data were used to determine the amount of refrigerant dissolved in lubricant under evaporator conditions at 10° C., 1 MPa and subsequent viscosity reduction. Data were compared with R410A/POE 22 and R410A/Zerol 150. The viscosity and percent refrigerant dissolved in lubricant at compression conditions was also determined, 80° C., 2.5 MPa. Results are shown below.


Example 44
















% Refrigerant

% Refrigerant




Dissolved in
Viscosity
Dissolved in
Viscosity



Lubricant at
(cPoise) at
Lubricant at
(cPoise) at



Evaporator
Evaporator at
Compression
Compressor at


Composition
Conditions
10° C.
Conditions
80° C.







R410A/10% PnB +
18
8
11
2.5


5% DPnB in Zerol


150







Comparative Data











R410A/POE22
45
3
17
3.1


R410A/Zerol 150
10
38 
 7
3.2









Results show a significant increase in refrigerant solubility and subsequent viscosity reduction in the evaporator by a compatibilizer of the present invention when added to a conventional alkyl benzene lubricant. This viscosity reduction can result in improved lubricant return to the compressor. Because less refrigerant is dissolved in the lubricant than POE 22 at compression conditions, viscosity remains high enough to effectively lubricate the compressor.


Example 45

Dynamic viscosity measurements were made using a ViscoPro2000 viscometer of POE 22, Zerol 150 and Zerol 150 containing 10 wt % PnB and 5 wt % DPnB. Results are shown in FIG. 10. Results show 10% PnB and 5% DPnB increase the viscosity index of Zerol 150. This gives the desirable result of lower viscosity at low temperature without lowering viscosity at high temperature, a profile similar to POE 22. This enhances lubricant return from the evaporator while maintaining good viscosity in the compressor.


Example 46

A four ball wear test using ASTM D4172B was conducted using steel balls was conducted to assess the lubricating properties for compositions of the present invention. The test was run for 60 minutes using different combinations of compatibilizer in alkyl benzene lubricant and compared to lubricant without compatibilizer. Wear scar and average coefficient of friction were measured. Results are shown below.

















Average Coefficient



Wear Scar (mm)
of Friction


















 6% DMM in Zerol 100
0.85
0.108


20% 1-octyl pyrrolidin-
0.61
0.093


2-one in Zerol 100


35% 1-octyl pyrrolidin-
0.64
0.091


2-one in Zerol 150


12% DMM/2% Synergol
0.52
0.113


in Zerol 150







Comparative Data









Zerol 150
0.88
0.110










Results show lubrication properties are similar or improved when compatibilizers of the present invention are added to conventional lubricants, as evidenced by reduced size of wear scar and similar lower coefficient of friction. Addition of antiwear additives such as Synergol further improves lubrication properties.


Example 47

Compressor durability tests were conducted with compositions of the present invention. A flooded start test was performed on scroll and rotary compressors. A flooded start test is a severe condition where the compressor sump is flooded with refrigerant on shutdown. During startup, presence of refrigerant can reduce lubricant viscosity resulting in inadequate compressor lubrication. This is particularly difficult with immiscible refrigerant/lubricant systems where two layers can form in the compressor sump with the refrigerant layer on the bottom, the point at which lubricant is normally drawn into the compressor bearings. The compressors were tested at −12.2° C. suction temperature and 37.8° C. discharge temperature. The compressors were cycled for three minutes on and fifteen mutes off for 1,000 cycles. After the tests the compressors were disassembled and inspected for wear. No significant wear was observed.


Example 47














Compressor Type
Refrigerant
Lubricant
Significant Wear







Rotary
R407C
10% PnB/5% DPnB
None




in Zerol 150


Scroll
R407C
10% PnB/5% DPnB
None




in Zerol 150







Comparative Data










Rotary
HCFC-22
Mineral Oil
None


Scroll
HCFC-22
Mineral Oil
None









Example 48

Compatibilizers of the present invention were tested for compatibility with polyester motor materials used in certain hermetic compressors. Strips of polyester film were placed in a sealed tube with HFC-134a refrigerant and different lubricant/compatibilizer combinations. The tubes were held at 150° C. for two weeks. The polyester strips were removed and bent ten times through an arc of 180° to evaluate for embrittlement. Strips in both the liquid and vapor phases were evaluated. Results are shown in the table below.


Example 48














# of Bends Before
# of Bends Before


Lubricant tested
Breaking Liquid
Breaking Vapor


with HFC-134a
Phase
Phase

















10% PnB/5% DPnB
1
1


in Zerol 150


12% DMM in Zerol 150
>10
>10


20% 1-octyl pyrrolidin-
>10
>10


2-one in Zerol 150







Comparative Data









Zerol 150
7
9


POE 22
10
1










The data show DMM (CH3O[CH2CH(CH3)O]2CH3) with no free hydroxyl groups has significantly improved polyester motor material compatibility versus PnB (C4H9OCH2CH(CH3)OH) and DPnB (C4H9O(CH2CH(CH3)O)2H), both with terminal hydroxyl groups. The data also show alkyl pyrrolidones such as 1-octyl-2-pyrrolidone are compatible with polyester motor materials and preferred for use in certain hermetic compressors.

Claims
  • 1. A lubricant composition for use in compression refrigeration and air conditioning, comprising: (a) at least one lubricant selected from the group consisting of paraffins, napthenes, aromatics and poly-α-olefins; and (b) at least one compatibilizer selected from amides represented by the formulae R1CONR2R3 and cyclo-[R4CON(R5)—], wherein R1, R2, and R3 are independently selected from aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals having from 1 to 12 carbon atoms and aromatic radicals having from 6 to 12 carbon atoms, and wherein one of R1, R2, and R3 is an aromatic radical having from 6 to 12 carbon atoms; R5 is selected from aromatic radicals having from 6 to 12 carbon atoms; R4 is selected from aliphatic hydrocarbylene radicals having from 3 to 12 carbon atoms; and wherein said amides have a molecular weight of from about 120 to about 300 atomic mass units and a carbon to oxygen ratio of from about 7 to about 20,
  • 2. A refrigerant composition for use in compression refrigeration and air conditioning, comprising: (a) at least one halogenated hydrocarbon selected from the group consisting of hydrofluorocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons; (b) at least one lubricant selected from the group consisting of paraffins, napthenes, aromatics and poly-α-olefins; and (c) at least one compatibilizer selected from amides represented by the formulae R1CONR2R3 and cyclo-[R4CON(R5)—], wherein R1, R2, R3 are independently selected from aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals having from 1 to 12 carbon atoms and aromatic radicals having from 6 to 12 carbon atoms, wherein one of R1, R2, and R3 is an aromatic radical having from 6 to 12 carbon atoms; and R5 is selected from aromatic radicals having from 6 to 12 carbon atoms; R4 is selected from aliphatic hydrocarbylene radicals having from 3 to 12 carbon atoms; and wherein said amides have a molecular weight of from about 120 to about 300 atomic mass units and a carbon to oxygen ratio of from about 7 to about 20,
  • 3. A refrigerant composition for use in compression refrigeration and air conditioning apparatus containing paraffinic, napthenic, aromatic and/or poly-α-olefinic lubricant, said refrigerant composition comprising: (a) at least one halogenated hydrocarbon selected from the group consisting of hydrofluorocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons; and (b) at least one compatibilizer selected from amides represented by the formulae R1CONR2R3 and cyclo-[R4CON(R5)—], wherein R1, R2, and R3 are independently selected from aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon radicals having from 1 to 12 carbon atoms aromatic radicals having from 6 to 12 carbon atoms, and wherein one of R1, R2, and R3 is an aromatic radical having from 6 to 12 carbon atoms; R5 is selected from aromatic radicals having from 6 to 12 carbon atoms; R4 is selected from aliphatic hydrocarbylene radicals having from 3 to 12 carbon atoms; and wherein said amides have a molecular weight of from about 120 to about 300 atomic mass units and a carbon to oxygen ratio of from about 7 to about 20.
  • 4. The composition of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein said amides have a molecular weight of from about 160 to about 250 atomic mass units and a carbon to oxygen ratio of from about 7 to about 16.
  • 5. The composition of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein said amides are represented by the formula cyclo-[(CR6R7)nCON(R5)—], wherein n is selected from integers from 3 to 5, R6 and R7 are hydrogen or contain a single saturated hydrocarbon radical among the n methylene units, and R5 is selected from aromatic radicals having from 6 to 12 carbon atoms, and where said amides have a molecular weight of from about 160 to about 250 atomic mass units and a carbon to oxygen ratio of from about 7 to about 16.
  • 6. The composition of claim 1, 2 or 3, optionally comprising an effective amount of a fragrance.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a continuation-in-part of prior application Ser. No. 10/010,187, filed Dec. 6, 2001, which claims the benefit of U.S Provisional Applications 60/304,552, filed Jul. 11, 2001, and 60/254,208, filed Dec. 8, 2000.

US Referenced Citations (37)
Number Name Date Kind
3085868 Champagnat Apr 1963 A
4010107 Rothert Mar 1977 A
4200543 Liston et al. Apr 1980 A
4355960 Gainer et al. Oct 1982 A
4359394 Gainer et al. Nov 1982 A
4428854 Enjo et al. Jan 1984 A
4431557 Shimizu et al. Feb 1984 A
4559154 Powell Dec 1985 A
4707996 Vobach Nov 1987 A
4755316 Magid et al. Jul 1988 A
4938887 Grava et al. Jul 1990 A
4963280 Wilkins et al. Oct 1990 A
4975212 Thomas et al. Dec 1990 A
4983313 Kaneko et al. Jan 1991 A
4992188 Jolley Feb 1991 A
5023007 Grava et al. Jun 1991 A
5104560 Huster et al. Apr 1992 A
5145594 Anton et al. Sep 1992 A
5154846 Thomas et al. Oct 1992 A
5194171 Jolley Mar 1993 A
5254280 Thomas et al. Oct 1993 A
5295357 Kaneko Mar 1994 A
5300245 Sawada et al. Apr 1994 A
5368765 Kaneko Nov 1994 A
5370812 Brown Dec 1994 A
5372737 Spauschus Dec 1994 A
5401433 Sawada et al. Mar 1995 A
5417872 Fukuda et al. May 1995 A
5431835 Katafuchi et al. Jul 1995 A
5514221 Bolmer May 1996 A
5549835 Uematsu et al. Aug 1996 A
5801132 Kaneko et al. Sep 1998 A
5826436 Scaringe et al. Oct 1998 A
5987902 Scaringe et al. Nov 1999 A
6074573 Kaneko Jun 2000 A
6183661 Makin et al. Feb 2001 B1
6251300 Takigawa et al. Jun 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (29)
Number Date Country
973700 Sep 1975 CA
1 169 969 May 1964 DE
DD 133967 Jan 1979 DE
196 38 526 Jun 1999 DE
0 083 933 Jul 1983 EP
0 521 650 Jan 1993 EP
571091 Nov 1993 EP
612839 Aug 1994 EP
645443 Mar 1995 EP
0 699 742 Mar 1996 EP
784090 Jul 1997 EP
406433 Dec 1997 EP
02930963 Jul 1990 JP
05025468 Feb 1993 JP
05060406 Mar 1993 JP
05202389 Aug 1993 JP
05295386 Nov 1993 JP
94330063 Nov 1994 JP
07097587 Apr 1995 JP
08319478 Dec 1996 JP
08337774 Dec 1996 JP
09067291 Mar 1997 JP
09227884 Sep 1997 JP
09 208980 Dec 1997 JP
1998-140175 May 1998 JP
11315295 Nov 1999 JP
2000-104087 Apr 2000 JP
WO 8401165 Mar 1984 WO
WO 0157164 Aug 2001 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20030209688 A1 Nov 2003 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60304552 Jul 2001 US
60254208 Dec 2000 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10010187 Dec 2001 US
Child 10164743 US