Removing substrate pretreatment compositions in nanoimprint lithography

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to removing an uncured substrate pretreatment composition after imprinting in a nanoimprint lithography process.

BACKGROUND

As the semiconductor processing industry strives for larger production yields while increasing the number of circuits per unit area, attention has been focused on the continued development of reliable high-resolution patterning techniques. One such technique in use today is commonly referred to as imprint lithography. Imprint lithography processes are described in detail in numerous publications, such as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0065252, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,936,194 and 8,349,241, all of which are incorporated by reference herein. Other areas of development in which imprint lithography has been employed include biotechnology, optical technology, and mechanical systems.

An imprint lithography technique disclosed in each of the aforementioned patent documents includes formation of a relief pattern in an imprint resist and transferring a pattern corresponding to the relief pattern into an underlying substrate. The patterning process uses a template spaced apart from the substrate and a polymerizable composition (an “imprint resist”) disposed between the template and the substrate. In some cases, the imprint resist is disposed on the substrate in the form of discrete, spaced-apart drops. The drops are allowed to spread before the imprint resist is contacted with the template. After the imprint resist is contacted with the template, the resist is allowed to uniformly fill the space between the substrate and the template, then the imprint resist is solidified to form a layer that has a pattern conforming to a shape of the surface of the template. After solidification, the template is separated from the patterned layer such that the template and the substrate are spaced apart.

Throughput in an imprint lithography process generally depends on a variety of factors. When the imprint resist is disposed on the substrate in the form of discrete, spaced-apart drops, throughput depends at least in part on the efficiency and uniformity of spreading of the drops on the substrate. Spreading of the imprint resist may be inhibited by factors such as gas voids between the drops and incomplete wetting of the substrate and/or the template by the drops.

Throughput in an imprint lithography process may be improved by pretreating the substrate with a pretreatment composition that facilitates spreading of the imprint resist. However, presence of uncured pretreatment composition after completing the imprint lithography process may cause defects in the resulting patterned layers if the uncured pretreatment composition is allowed to spread onto imprinted fields, and may result in contamination by evaporating from the substrate.

SUMMARY

In a first general aspect, a nanoimprint lithography method includes disposing a pretreatment composition on a nanoimprint lithography substrate to form a pretreatment coating on the nanoimprint lithography substrate and disposing discrete portions of imprint resist on the pretreatment coating, each discrete portion of the imprint resist covering a target area of the nanoimprint lithography substrate. The pretreatment composition includes a polymerizable component, and the imprint resist is a polymerizable composition. A composite polymerizable coating is formed on the nanoimprint lithography substrate as each discrete portion of the imprint resist spreads beyond its target area. The composite polymerizable coating comprises a mixture of the pretreatment composition and the imprint resist. The composite polymerizable coating is contacted with a nanoimprint lithography template, and polymerized to yield a composite polymeric layer and an uncured portion of the pretreatment coating on the nanoimprint lithography substrate. The uncured portion of the pretreatment coating is removed from the nanoimprint lithography substrate.

Implementations of the first general aspect may include one or more of the following features.

Removing the uncured portion of the pretreatment coating from the nanoimprint lithography substrate may include heating the nanoimprint lithography substrate to evaporate the uncured portion of the pretreatment coating. In some cases, heating the nanoimprint lithography substrate includes heating the nanoimprint lithography substrate to a maximum temperature less than the glass transition temperature of the imprint resist.

Removing the uncured portion of the pretreatment coating may include reducing the pressure surrounding the nanoimprint lithography substrate to a pressure below atmospheric pressure. In some cases, the nanoimprint lithography template is heated while under reduced pressure.

Removing the uncured portion of the pretreatment coating may include irradiating the uncured portion of the pretreatment coating with electromagnetic radiation. The electromagnetic radiation may include at least one of deep ultraviolet light, infrared light, and microwaves. In some cases, irradiating includes irradiating with at least one of a CO₂laser, a Nd:YAG laser, and a diode laser. In certain cases, irradiating includes blanket exposure.

A second general aspect includes a nanoimprint lithography stack formed by the first general aspect.

In a third general aspect, a nanoimprint lithography method includes:

a) disposing a pretreatment composition on a first nanoimprint lithography substrate to form a pretreatment coating on the nanoimprint lithography substrate, wherein the pretreatment composition comprises a polymerizable component;

b) disposing discrete portions of imprint resist on the pretreatment coating, each discrete portion of the imprint resist covering a target area of the nanoimprint lithography substrate, wherein the imprint resist is a polymerizable composition;

c) forming a composite polymerizable coating on the nanoimprint lithography substrate as each discrete portion of the imprint resist spreads beyond its target area, wherein the composite polymerizable coating comprises a mixture of the pretreatment composition and the imprint resist;

d) contacting the composite polymerizable coating with a nanoimprint lithography template;

e) polymerizing the composite polymerizable coating to yield a composite polymeric layer;

f) repeating b) through e) to yield an imprinted nanoimprint lithography substrate;

g) repeating a) through f) to yield a multiplicity of imprinted nanoimprint lithography substrates, wherein each imprinted nanoimprint lithography substrate comprises an uncured portion of the pretreatment coating; and

h) removing the uncured portions of the pretreatment coating from the multiplicity of imprinted nanoimprint lithography substrates in a batch process.

Implementations of the third general aspect may include one or more of the following implementations.

Removing the uncured portion of the pretreatment coating from the multiplicity of imprinted nanoimprint lithography substrates in a batch process may include heating the multiplicity of imprinted nanoimprint lithography substrates.

Removing the uncured portion of the pretreatment coating from the multiplicity of imprinted nanoimprint lithography substrates in a batch process may include reducing a pressure surrounding the multiplicity of nanoimprint lithography substrates to a pressure below atmospheric pressure. In some cases, the multiplicity of imprinted nanoimprint lithography substrates is heated while under reduced pressure.

Removing the uncured portion of the pretreatment coating from the multiplicity of imprinted nanoimprint lithography substrates in a batch process may include irradiating the multiplicity of nanoimprint lithography substrates with electromagnetic radiation.

In some cases, the electromagnetic radiation includes microwave radiation.

The details of one or more implementations of the subject matter described in this specification are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts a simplified side view of a lithographic system.

FIG. 2 depicts a simplified side view of the substrate shown in FIG. 1, with a patterned layer formed on the substrate.

FIGS. 3A-3D depict spreading interactions between a drop of a second liquid on a layer of a first liquid.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart depicting a process for facilitating nanoimprint lithography throughput.

FIG. 5A depicts a nanoimprint lithography substrate. FIG. 5B depicts a pretreatment coating disposed on a nanoimprint lithography substrate.

FIGS. 6A-6D depict formation of a composite coating from drops of imprint resist disposed on a substrate having a pretreatment coating.

FIGS. 7A-7D depict cross-sectional views along lines w-w, x-x, y-y, and z-z of FIGS. 6A-6D, respectively.

FIGS. 8A and 8B depict cross-sectional views of a pretreatment coating displaced by drops on a nanoimprint lithography substrate.

FIGS. 9A-9C depict cross-sectional views of a template in contact with a homogeneous composite coating and the resulting nanoimprint lithography stack.

FIGS. 10A-10C depict cross-sectional views of a template in contact with an inhomogeneous composite coating and the resulting nanoimprint lithography stack.

FIG. 11 depicts a nanoimprint lithography substrate with a composite polymeric layer and uncured pretreatment coating.

FIGS. 12A-12C are flowcharts depicting processes for removing uncured pretreatment composition from a nanoimprint lithography substrate.

FIG. 13 is an image of drops of an imprint resist after spreading on an adhesion layer of a substrate without a pretreatment coating, corresponding to Comparative Example 1.

FIG. 14 is an image of drops of an imprint resist after spreading on a pretreatment coating as described in Example 1.

FIG. 15 is an image of drops of an imprint resist after spreading on a pretreatment coating as described in Example 2.

FIG. 16 is an image of drops of an imprint resist after spreading on a pretreatment coating as described in Example 3.

FIG. 17 shows defect density as a function of prespreading time for the imprint resist and pretreatment of Example 2.

FIG. 18 shows drop diameter versus time for spreading pretreatment compositions.

FIG. 19A shows viscosity as a function of fractional composition of one component in a two-component pretreatment composition. FIG. 19B shows drop diameter versus time for various ratios of components in a two-component pretreatment composition. FIG. 19C shows surface tension of a two-component pretreatment composition versus fraction of one component in the two-component pretreatment composition.

FIG. 20 shows film thickness of uncured pretreatment composition versus heat treatment duration at 60° C., 80° C., and 90° C.

FIG. 21 shows evaporation of uncured pretreatment compositions over time in air and under vacuum.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 depicts an imprint lithographic system 100 of the sort used to form a relief pattern on substrate 102. Substrate 102 may include a base and an adhesion layer adhered to the base. Substrate 102 may be coupled to substrate chuck 104. As illustrated, substrate chuck 104 is a vacuum chuck. Substrate chuck 104, however, may be any chuck including, but not limited to, vacuum, pin-type, groove-type, electromagnetic, and/or the like. Exemplary chucks are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,873,087, which is incorporated by reference herein. Substrate 102 and substrate chuck 104 may be further supported by stage 106. Stage 106 may provide motion about the x-, y-, and z-axes. Stage 106, substrate 102, and substrate chuck 104 may also be positioned on a base.

Spaced apart from substrate 102 is a template 108. Template 108 generally includes a rectangular or square mesa 110 some distance from the surface of the template towards substrate 102. A surface of mesa 110 may be patterned. In some cases, mesa 110 is referred to as mold 110 or mask 110. Template 108, mold 110, or both may be formed from such materials including, but not limited to, fused silica, quartz, silicon, silicon nitride, organic polymers, siloxane polymers, borosilicate glass, fluorocarbon polymers, metal (e.g., chrome, tantalum), hardened sapphire, or the like, or a combination thereof. As illustrated, patterning of surface 112 includes features defined by a plurality of spaced-apart recesses 114 and protrusions 116, though embodiments are not limited to such configurations. Patterning of surface 112 may define any original pattern that forms the basis of a pattern to be formed on substrate 102.

Template 108 is coupled to chuck 118. Chuck 118 is typically configured as, but not limited to, vacuum, pin-type, groove-type, electromagnetic, or other similar chuck types. Exemplary chucks are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,873,087, which is incorporated by reference herein. Further, chuck 118 may be coupled to imprint head 120 such that chuck 118 and/or imprint head 120 may be configured to facilitate movement of template 108.

System 100 may further include a fluid dispense system 122. Fluid dispense system 122 may be used to deposit imprint resist 124 on substrate 102. Imprint resist 124 may be dispensed upon substrate 102 using techniques such as drop dispense, spin-coating, dip coating, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), physical vapor deposition (PVD), thin film deposition, thick film deposition, or the like. In a drop dispense method, imprint resist 124 is disposed on substrate 102 in the form of discrete, spaced-apart drops, as depicted in FIG. 1.

System 100 may further include an energy source 126 coupled to direct energy along path 128. Imprint head 120 and stage 106 may be configured to position template 108 and substrate 102 in superimposition with path 128. System 100 may be regulated by a processor 130 in communication with stage 106, imprint head 120, fluid dispense system 122, and/or source 126, and may operate on a computer readable program stored in memory 132.

Imprint head 120 may apply a force to template 108 such that mold 110 contacts imprint resist 124. After the desired volume is filled with imprint resist 124, source 126 produces energy (e.g., electromagnetic radiation or thermal energy), causing imprint resist 124 to solidify (e.g., polymerize and/or crosslink), conforming to the shape of surface 134 of substrate 102 and patterning surface 112. After solidification of imprint resist 124 to yield a polymeric layer on substrate 102, mold 110 is separated from the polymeric layer.

FIG. 2 depicts nanoimprint lithography stack 200 formed by solidifying imprint resist 124 to yield patterned polymeric layer 202 on substrate 102. Patterned layer 202 may include a residual layer 204 and a plurality of features shown as protrusions 206 and recesses 208, with protrusions 206 having a thickness t₁and residual layer 204 having a thickness t₂. In nanoimprint lithography, a length of one or more protrusions 206, recessions 208, or both parallel to substrate 102 is less than 100 nm, less than 50 nm, or less than 25 nm. In some cases, a length of one or more protrusions 206, recessions 208, or both is between 1 nm and 25 nm or between 1 nm and 10 nm.

The above-described system and process may be further implemented in imprint lithography processes and systems such as those referred to in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,932,934; 7,077,992; 7,197,396; and 7,396,475, all of which are incorporated by reference herein.

For a drop-on-demand or drop dispense nanoimprint lithography process, in which imprint resist 124 is disposed on substrate 102 as discrete portions (“drops”), as depicted in FIG. 1, the drops of the imprint resist typically spread on the substrate 102 before and after mold 110 contacts the imprint resist. If the spreading of the drops of imprint resist 124 is insufficient to cover substrate 102 or fill recesses 114 of mold 110, polymeric layer 202 may be formed with defects in the form of voids. Thus, a drop-on-demand nanoimprint lithography process typically includes a delay between initiation of dispensation of the drops of imprint resist 124 and initiation of movement of the mold 110 toward the imprint resist on the substrate 102 and subsequent filling of the space between the substrate and the template. Thus, throughput of an automated nanoimprint lithography process is generally limited by the rate of spreading of the imprint resist on the substrate and filling of the template. Accordingly, throughput of a drop-on-demand or drop dispense nanoimprint lithography process may be improved by reducing “fill time” (i.e., the time required to completely fill the space between the template and substrate without voids). One way to decrease fill time is to increase the rate of spreading of the drops of the imprint resist and coverage of the substrate with the imprint resist before movement of the mold toward the substrate is initiated. As described herein, the rate of spreading of an imprint resist and the uniformity of coverage of the substrate may be improved by pretreating the substrate with a liquid that promotes rapid and even spreading of the discrete portions of the imprint resist and polymerizes with the imprint resist during formation of the patterned layer.

Spreading of discrete portions of a second liquid on a first liquid may be understood with reference to FIGS. 3A-3D. FIGS. 3A-3D depict first liquid 300 and second liquid 302 on substrate 304 and in contact with gas 306 (e.g., air, an inert gas such as helium or nitrogen, or a combination of inert gases). First liquid 300 is present on substrate 304 in the form of coating or layer, used here interchangeably. In some cases, first liquid 300 is present as a layer having a thickness of a few nanometers (e.g., between 1 nm and 15 nm, or between 5 nm and 10 nm). Second liquid 302 is present in the form of a discrete portion (“drop”). The properties of first liquid 300 and second liquid 302 may vary with respect to each other. For instance, in some cases, first liquid 300 may be more viscous and dense than second liquid 302.

The interfacial surface energy, or surface tension, between second liquid 302 and first liquid 300 is denoted as γ_LIL2. The interfacial surface energy between first liquid 300 and gas 306 is denoted as γ_L1G. The interfacial surface energy between second liquid 302 and gas 306 is denoted as γ_L2G. The interfacial surface energy between first liquid 300 and substrate 304 is denoted as γ_SL1. The interfacial surface energy between second liquid 302 and substrate 304 is denoted as γ_SL2.

FIG. 3A depicts second liquid 302 as a drop disposed on first liquid 300. Second liquid 302 does not deform first liquid 300 and does not touch substrate 304. As depicted, first liquid 300 and second liquid 302 do not intermix, and the interface between the first liquid and the second liquid is depicted as flat. At equilibrium, the contact angle of second liquid 302 on first liquid 300 is θ, which is related to the interfacial surface energies γ_L1G, γ_L2G, and γ_L1L2by Young's equation:

γ_L1G=γ_L1L2+γ_L2G·cos(θ) (1)
If
γ_L1G≥γ_L1L2+γ_L2G (2)

then θ=0°, and second liquid 302 spreads completely on first liquid 300. If the liquids are intermixable, then after some elapsed time,

γ_L1L2=0 (3)

In this case, the condition for complete spreading of second liquid 302 on first liquid 300 is

γ_L1G≥γ_L2G (4)

For thin films of first liquid 300 and small drops of second liquid 302, intermixing may be limited by diffusion processes. Thus, for second liquid 302 to spread on first liquid 300, the inequality (2) is more applicable in the initial stages of spreading, when second liquid 302 is disposed on first liquid 300 in the form of a drop.

FIG. 3B depicts contact angle formation for a drop of second liquid 302 when the underlying layer of first liquid 300 is thick. In this case, the drop does not touch the substrate 304. Drop of second liquid 302 and layer of first liquid 300 intersect at angles α, β, and θ, with

α+β+θ=2π (5)

There are three conditions for the force balance along each interface:

γ_L2G+γ_L1L2·cos(θ)+γ_L1G·cos(α)=0 (6)
γ_L2G·cos(θ)+γ_L1L2+γ_L1G·cos(β)=0 (7)
γ_L2G·cos(α)+γ_L1L2·cos(β)+γ_L1G=0 (8)

If first liquid 300 and second liquid 302 are intermixable, then

γ_L1L2=0 (9)

and equations (6)-(8) become:

γ_L2G+γ_L1G·cos(α)=0 (10)
γ_L2G·cos(θ)+γ_L1G·cos(β)=0 (11)
γ_L2G·cos(α)+γ_L1G=0 (12)

Equations (10) and (12) give

cos²(α)=1 (13)

and

α=0,π (14)

When second liquid 302 wets first liquid 300,

α=π (15)
γ_L2G=γ_L1G (16)

and equation (11) gives

cos(θ)+cos(β)=0 (17)

Combining this result with equations (5) and (15) gives:

θ=0 (18)
β=π (19)

Thus, equations (15), (18), and (19) give solutions for angles α, β, and θ.

When

γ_L1G≥γ_L2G (20)

there is no equilibrium between the interfaces. Equation (12) becomes an inequality even for α=π, and second liquid 302 spreads continuously on first liquid 300.

FIG. 3C depicts a more complex geometry for a drop of second liquid 302 touching substrate 304 while also having an interface with first liquid 300. Interfacial regions between first liquid 300, second liquid 302, and gas 306 (defined by angles α, β, and θ₁) and first liquid 300, second liquid 302, and substrate 304 (defined by angle θ₂) must be considered to determine spreading behavior of the second liquid on the first liquid.

The interfacial region between first liquid 300, second liquid 302, and gas 306 is governed by equations (6)-(8). Since first liquid 300 and second liquid 302 are intermixable,

γ_L1L2=0 (21)

The solutions for angle α are given by equation (14). In this case, let

α=0 (22)

and

θ¹=π (23)
β=π (24)

When

γ_L1G≥γ_L2G (25)

there is no equilibrium between the drop of second liquid 302 and first liquid 300, and the drop spreads continuously along the interface between the second liquid and the gas until limited by other physical limitations (e.g., conservation of volume and intermixing).

For the interfacial region between first liquid 300, second liquid 302, and substrate 304, an equation similar to equation (1) should be considered:

γ_SL1=γ_SL2+γ_L1L2·cos(θ₂) (26)

If

γ_SL1≥γ_SL2+γ_L1L2 (27)

the drop spreads completely, and θ₂=0.

Again, as for the intermixable liquids, the second term γ_L1L2=0, and the inequality (27) simplifies to

γ_SL1≥γ_SL2 (28)

The combined condition for the drop spreading is expressed as

γ_L1G+γ_SL1≥γ_L2G+γ_SL2 (29)

when energies before and after the spreading are considered. There should be an energetically favorable transition (i.e., the transition that minimizes the energy of the system).

Different relationships between the four terms in the inequality (29) will determine the drop spreading character. The drop of second liquid 302 can initially spread along the surface of the first liquid 300 if the inequality (25) is valid but the inequality (28) is not. Or the drop can start spreading along liquid-solid interface provided the inequality (28) holds up and the inequality (25) does not. Eventually first liquid 300 and second liquid 302 will intermix, thus introducing more complexity.

FIG. 3D depicts a geometry for a drop of second liquid 302 touching substrate 304 while having an interface with first liquid 300. As indicated in FIG. 3D, there are two interfacial regions of interest on each side of the drop of second liquid 302. The first interfacial region is where first liquid 300, second liquid 302, and gas 306 meet, indicated by angles α, β, and θ₁. The second interfacial region of interest is where first liquid 300, second liquid 302, and substrate 304 meet, indicated by angle θ₂. Here, θ₁approaches 0° and θ₂approaches 180° as the drop spreads when the surface tension of the interface between second liquid 302 and substrate 304 exceeds the surface tension of the interface between first liquid 300 and the substrate (γ_SL2≥γ_SL1). That is, drop of second liquid 302 spreads along the interface between first liquid 300 and the second liquid and does not spread along the interface between the second liquid and substrate 304.

For the interface between first liquid 300, second liquid 302, and gas 306, equations (6)-(8) are applicable. First liquid 300 and second liquid 302 are intermixable, so

γ_L1L2=0 (30)

The solutions for angle α are given by equation (14). For

α=π (31)

Equation (11) gives

cos(θ₁)+cos(β)=0 (32)

and

θ₁=0 (33)
β=π (34)

When

γ_L1G≥γ_L2G (35)

there is no equilibrium between the drop of second liquid 302 and liquid 300, and the drop spreads continuously along the interface between the second liquid and the gas until limited by other physical limitations (e.g., conservation of volume and intermixing).

For the interfacial region between second liquid 302 and substrate 304,

γ_SL1=γ_SL2+γ_L1L2·cos(θ₂) (36)

$\begin{matrix} \cos (θ_{2}) = \frac{γ_{{SL}_{1}} - γ_{{SL}_{2}}}{γ_{L_{1} L_{2}}} & (37) \end{matrix}$

If

γ_SL1≤γ_SL2 (38)

and the liquids are intermixable, i.e.,

γ_L1L2→0 (39)
−∞≤cos(θ₂)≤−1 (40)

the angle θ₂approaches 180° and then becomes undefined. That is, second liquid 302 has a tendency to contract along the substrate interface and spread along the interface between first liquid 300 and gas 306.

Spreading of second liquid 302 on first liquid 300 can be summarized for three different cases, along with the surface energy relationship for complete spreading. In the first case, drop of second liquid 302 is disposed on layer of first liquid 300, and the drop of the second liquid does not contact substrate 304. Layer of first liquid 300 can be thick or thin, and the first liquid 300 and second liquid 302 are intermixable. Under ideal conditions, when the surface energy of first liquid 300 in the gas 306 is greater than or equal to the surface energy of the second liquid 302 in the gas (γ_L1G≥γ_L2G), complete spreading of the drop of second liquid 302 occurs on layer of first liquid 300. In the second case, drop of second liquid 302 is disposed on layer of first liquid 300 while touching and spreading at the same time on substrate 304. The first liquid and second liquid 302 are intermixable. Under ideal conditions, complete spreading occurs when: (i) the surface energy of first liquid 300 in the gas is greater than or equal to the surface energy of second liquid 302 in the gas (γ_L1G≥γ_L2G); and (ii) the surface energy of the interface between the first liquid and substrate 304 exceeds the surface energy of the interface between the second liquid and the substrate (γ_SL1≥γ_SL2). In the third case, drop of second liquid 302 is disposed on layer of the first liquid 300 while touching substrate 304. Spreading may occur along the interface between second liquid 302 and first liquid 300 or the interface between the second liquid and substrate 304. The first liquid and second liquid 302 are intermixable. Under ideal conditions, complete spreading occurs when the sum of the surface energy of first liquid 300 in the gas and the surface energy of the interface between the first liquid and substrate 304 is greater than or equal to the sum of the surface energy of second liquid 302 in the gas and the surface energy of the interface between the second liquid and the substrate (γ_L1G+γ_SL1≥γ_L2G+γ_SL2) while the surface energy of first liquid 300 in the gas is greater than or equal to the surface energy of second liquid 302 in the gas (γ_L1G≥γ_L2G) or (ii) the surface energy of the interface between the first liquid and substrate 304 exceeds the surface energy of the interface between the second liquid and the substrate (γ_SL1≥γ_SL2).

By pretreating a nanoimprint lithography substrate with a liquid selected to have a surface energy greater than that of the imprint resist in the ambient atmosphere (e.g., air or an inert gas), the rate at which an imprint resist spreads on the substrate in a drop-on-demand nanoimprint lithography process may be increased and a more uniform thickness of the imprint resist on the substrate may be established before the imprint resist is contacted with the template, thereby facilitating throughput in the nanoimprint lithography process. If the pretreatment composition includes polymerizable components capable of intermixing with the imprint resist, then this can advantageously contribute to formation of the resulting polymeric layer without the addition of undesired components, and may result in more uniform curing, thereby providing more uniform mechanical and etch properties.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a process 400 for facilitating throughput in drop-on-demand nanoimprint lithography. Process 400 includes operations 402-410. In operation 402, a pretreatment composition is disposed on a nanoimprint lithography substrate to form a pretreatment coating on the substrate. In operation 404, discrete portions (“drops”) of an imprint resist are disposed on the pretreatment coating, with each drop covering a target area of the substrate. The pretreatment composition and the imprint resist are selected such that the interfacial surface energy between the pretreatment composition and the air exceeds the interfacial surface energy between the imprint resist and the air.

In operation 406, a composite polymerizable coating (“composite coating”) is formed on the substrate as each drop of the imprint resist spreads beyond its target area. The composite coating includes a homogeneous or inhomogeneous mixture of the pretreatment composition and the imprint resist. In operation 408, the composite coating is contacted with a nanoimprint lithography template (“template”), and allowed to spread and fill all the volume between the template and substrate, and in operation 410, the composite coating is polymerized to yield a polymeric layer on the substrate. After polymerization of the composite coating, the template is separated from the polymeric layer, leaving a nanoimprint lithography stack. As used herein, “nanoimprint lithography stack” generally refers to the substrate and the polymeric layer adhered to the substrate, each or both of which may include one or more additional (e.g., intervening) layers. In one example, the substrate includes a base and an adhesion layer adhered to the base.

In process 400, the pretreatment composition and the imprint resist may include a mixture of components as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,157,036 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,076,386, as well as Chou et al. 1995, Imprint of sub-25 nm vias and trenches in polymers. Applied Physics Letters 67(21):3114-3116; Chou et al. 1996, Nanoimprint lithography. Journal of Vacuum Science Technology B 14(6): 4129-4133; and Long et al. 2007, Materials for step and flash imprint lithography (S-FIL®. Journal of Materials Chemistry 17:3575-3580, all of which are incorporated by reference herein. Suitable compositions include polymerizable monomers (“monomers”), crosslinkers, resins, photoinitiators, surfactants, or any combination thereof. Classes of monomers include acrylates, methacrylates, vinyl ethers, and epoxides, as well as polyfunctional derivatives thereof. In some cases, the pretreatment composition, the imprint resist, or both are substantially free of silicon. In other cases, the pretreatment composition, the imprint resist, or both are silicon-containing. Silicon-containing monomers include, for example, siloxanes and disiloxanes. Resins can be silicon-containing (e.g., silsesquioxanes) and non-silicon-containing (e.g., novolak resins). The pretreatment composition, the imprint resist, or both may also include one or more polymerization initiators or free radical generators. Classes of polymerization initiators include, for example, photoinitiators (e.g., acyloins, xanthones, and phenones), photoacid generators (e.g., sulfonates and onium salts), and photobase generators (e.g., ortho-nitrobenzyl carbamates, oxime urethanes, and O-acyl oximes).

Suitable monomers include monofunctional, difunctional, or multifunctional acrylates, methacrylates, vinyl ethers, and epoxides, in which mono-, di-, and multi-refer to one, two, and three or more of the indicated functional groups, respectively. Some or all of the monomers may be fluorinated (e.g., perfluorinated). In the case of acrylates, for example, the pretreatment, the imprint resist, or both may include one or more monofunctional acrylates, one or more difunctional acrylates, one or more multifunctional acrylates, or a combination thereof.

Examples of suitable monofunctional acrylates include isobornyl acrylate, 3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexyl acrylate, dicyclopentenyl acrylate, benzyl acrylate, 1-naphthyl acrylate, 4-cyanobenzyl acrylate, pentafluorobenzyl acrylate, 2-phenylethyl acrylate, phenyl acrylate, (2-ethyl-2-methyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)methyl acrylate, n-hexyl acrylate, 4-tert-butylcyclohexyl acrylate, methoxy polyethylene glycol (350) monoacrylate, and methoxy polyethylene glycol (550) monoacrylate.

Examples of suitable diacrylates include ethylene glycol diacrylate, diethylene glycol diacrylate, triethylene glycol diacrylate, tetraethylene glycol diacrylate, polyethylene glycol diacrylate (e.g., Mn, avg=575), 1,2-propanediol diacrylate, dipropylene glycol diacrylate, tripropylene glycol diacrylate, polypropylene glycol diacrylate, 1,3-propanediol diacrylate, 1,4-butanediol diacrylate, 2-butene-1,4-diacrylate, 1,3-butylene glycol diacrylate, 3-methyl-1,3-butanediol diacrylate, 1,5-pentanediol diacrylate, 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate, 1H,1H,6H,6H-perfluoro-1,6-hexanediol diacrylate, 1,9-nonanediol diacrylate, 1,10-decanediol diacrylate, 1,12-dodecanediol diacrylate, neopentyl glycol diacrylate, cyclohexane dimethanol diacrylate, tricyclodecane dimethanol diacrylate, bisphenol A diacrylate, ethoxylated bisphenol A diacrylate, m-xylylene diacrylate, ethoxylated (3) bisphenol A diacrylate, ethoxylated (4) bisphenol A diacrylate, ethoxylated (10) bisphenol A diacrylate, tricyclodecane dimethanol diacrylate, 1,2-adamantanediol diacrylate, 2,4-diethylpentane-1,5-diol diacrylate, poly(ethylene glycol) (400) diacrylate, poly(ethylene glycol) (300) diacrylate, 1,6-hexanediol (EO)₂diacrylate, 1,6-hexanediol (EO)₅diacrylate, and alkoxylated aliphatic diacrylate ester.

Examples of suitable multifunctional acrylates include trimethylolpropane triacrylate, propoxylated trimethylolpropane triacrylate (e.g., propoxylated (3) trimethylolpropane triacrylate, propoxylated (6) trimethylolpropane triacrylate), trimethylolpropane ethoxylate triacrylate (e.g., n˜1.3, 3, 5), di(trimethylolpropane) tetraacrylate, propoxylated glyceryl triacrylate (e.g., propoxylated (3) glyceryl triacrylate), tris (2-hydroxy ethyl) isocyanurate triacrylate, pentaerythritol triacrylate, pentaerythritol tetracrylate, ethoxylated pentaerythritol tetracrylate, dipentaerythritol pentaacrylate, tripentaerythritol octaacrylate.

Examples of suitable crosslinkers include difunctional acrylates and multifunctional acrylates, such as those described herein.

Examples of suitable photoinitiators include IRGACURE 907, IRGACURE 4265, 651, 1173, 819, TPO, and TPO-L.

A surfactant can be applied to a patterned surface of an imprint lithography template, added to an imprint lithography resist, or both, to reduce the separation force between the solidified resist and the template, thereby reducing separation defects in imprinted patterns formed in an imprint lithography process and to increase the number of successive imprints that can be made with an imprint lithography template. Factors in selecting a surfactant for an imprint resist include, for example, affinity with the surface and desired surface properties of the treated surface.

Examples of suitable surfactants include fluorinated and non-fluorinated surfactants. The fluorinated and non-fluorinated surfactants may be ionic or non-ionic surfactants. Suitable non-ionic fluorinated surfactants include fluoro-aliphatic polymeric esters, perfluoroether surfactants, fluorosurfactants of polyoxyethylene, fluorosurfactants of polyalkyl ethers, fluoroalkyl polyethers, and the like. Suitable non-ionic non-fluorinated surfactants include ethoxylated alcohols, ethoxylated alkylphenols, and polyethyleneoxide-polypropyleneoxide block copolymers.

Exemplary commercially available surfactant components include, but are not limited to, ZONYL® FSO and ZONYL® FS-300, manufactured by E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company having an office located in Wilmington, Del.; FC-4432 and FC-4430, manufactured by 3M having an office located in Maplewood, Minn.; MASURF® FS-1700, FS-2000, and FS-2800 manufactured by Pilot Chemical Company having an office located in Cincinnati, Ohio; S-107B, manufactured by Chemguard having an office located in Mansfield, Tex.; FTERGENT 222F, FTERGENT 250, FTERGENT 251, manufactured by NEOS Chemical Chuo-ku, Kobe-shi, Japan; PolyFox PF-656, manufactured by OMNOVA Solutions Inc. having an office located in Akron, Ohio; Pluronic L35, L42, L43, L44, L63, L64, etc. manufactured by BASF having an office located in Florham Park, N.J.; Brij 35, 58, 78, etc. manufactured by Croda Inc. having an office located in Edison, N.J.

In some examples, an imprint resist includes 0 wt % to 80 wt % (e.g., 20 wt % to 80 wt % or 40 wt % to 80 wt %) of one or more monofunctional acrylates; 90 wt % to 98 wt % of one or more difunctional or multifunctional acrylates (e.g., the imprint resist may be substantially free of monofunctional acrylates) or 20 wt % to 75 wt % of one or more difunctional or multifunctional acrylates (e.g., when one or more monofunctional acrylates is present); 1 wt % to 10 wt % of one or more photoinitiators; and 1 wt % to 10 wt % of one or more surfactants. In one example, an imprint resist includes about 40 wt % to about 50 wt % of one or more monofunctional acrylates, about 45 wt % to about 55 wt % of one or more difunctional acrylates, about 4 w % to about 6 wt % of one or more photoinitiators, and about 3 wt % surfactant. In another example, an imprint resist includes about 44 wt % of one or more monofunctional acrylates, about 48 wt % of one or more difunctional acrylates, about 5 wt % of one or more photoinitiators, and about 3 wt % surfactant. In yet another example, an imprint resist includes about 10 wt % of a first monofunctional acrylate (e.g., isobornyl acrylate), about 34 wt % of a second monofunctional acrylate (e.g., benzyl acrylate) about 48 wt % of a difunctional acrylate (e.g., neopentyl glycol diacrylate), about 2 wt % of a first photoinitiator (e.g., IRGACURE TPO), about 3 wt % of a second photoinitiator (e.g., DAROCUR 4265), and about 3 wt % surfactant. Examples of suitable surfactants include X—R—(OCH₂CH₂)_nOH, where R=alkyl, aryl, or poly(propylene glycol), X═H or —(OCH₂CH₂)_nOH, and n is an integer (e.g., 2 to 20, 5 to 15, or 10 to 12) (e.g., X═—(OCH₂CH₂)_nOH, R=poly(propylene glycol), and n=10 to 12); Y—R—(OCH₂CH₂)_nOH, where R=alkyl, aryl, or poly(propylene glycol), Y=a fluorinated chain (perfluorinated alkyl or perfluorinated ether) or poly(ethylene glycol) capped with a fluorinated chain, and n is an integer (e.g., 2 to 20, 5 to 15, or 10 to 12) (e.g., Y=poly(ethylene glycol) capped with a perfluorinated alkyl group, R=poly(propylene glycol), and n is an integer of 10 to 12); and a combination thereof. The viscosity of the imprint resist is typically between 0.1 cP and 25 cP, or between 5 cP and 15 cP at 23° C. The interfacial surface energy between the imprint resist and air is typically between 20 mN/m and 36 mN/m.

In one example, a pretreatment composition includes 0 wt % to 80 wt % (e.g., 20 wt % to 80 wt % or 40 wt % to 80 wt %) of one or more monofunctional acrylates; 90 wt % to 100 wt % of one or more difunctional or multifunctional acrylates (e.g., the pretreatment composition is substantially free of monofunctional acrylates) or 20 wt % to 75 wt % of one or more difunctional or multifunctional acrylates (e.g., when one or more monofunctional acrylates is present); 0 wt % to 10 wt % of one or more photoinitiators; and 0 wt % to 10 wt % of one or more surfactants.

The pretreatment composition is typically miscible with the imprint resist. The pretreatment composition typically has a low vapor pressure, such that it remains present as a thin film on the substrate until the composite coating is polymerized. In one example, the vapor pressure of a pretreatment composition is less than 1×10⁻⁴mmHg at 25° C. The pretreatment composition also typically has a low viscosity to facilitate rapid spreading of the pretreatment composition on the substrate. In one example, the viscosity of a pretreatment composition is less than 90 cP at 25° C. The interfacial surface energy between the pretreatment composition and air is typically between 30 mN/m and 45 mN/m. The pretreatment composition is typically selected to be chemically stable, such that decomposition does not occur during use.

A pretreatment composition may be a single polymerizable component (e.g., a monomer such as a monofunctional acrylate, a difunctional acrylate, or a multifunctional acrylate), a mixture of two or more polymerizable components (e.g., a mixture of two or more monomers), or a mixture of one or more polymerizable components and one or more other components (e.g., a mixture of monomers; a mixture of two or more monomers and a surfactant, a photoinitiator, or both; and the like). In some examples, a pretreatment composition includes trimethylolpropane triacrylate, trimethylolpropane ethoxylate triacrylate, 1,12-dodecanediol diacrylate, poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate, tetraethylene glycol diacrylate, 1,3-adamantanediol diacrylate, nonanediol diacrylate, m-xylylene diacrylate, tricyclodecane dimethanol diacrylate, or any combination thereof.

Mixtures of polymerizable components may result in synergistic effects, yielding pretreatment compositions having a more advantageous combination of properties (e.g., low viscosity, good etch resistance and film stability) than a pretreatment composition with a single polymerizable component. In one example, the pretreatment composition is a mixture of 1,12-dodecanediol diacrylate and tricyclodecane dimethanol diacrylate. In another example, the pretreatment composition is a mixture of tricyclodecane dimethanol diacrylate and tetraethylene glycol diacrylate. The pretreatment composition is generally selected such that one or more components of the pretreatment composition polymerizes (e.g., covalently bonds) with one or more components of the imprint resist during polymerization of the composite polymerizable coating. In some cases, the pretreatment composition includes a polymerizable component that is also in the imprint resist, or a polymerizable component that has a functional group in common with one or more polymerizable components in the imprint resist (e.g., an acrylate group). Suitable examples of pretreatment compositions include multifunctional acrylates such as those described herein, including propoxylated (3) trimethylolpropane triacrylate, trimethylolpropane triacrylate, and dipentaerythritol pentaacrylate.

A pretreatment composition may be selected such that the etch resistance is generally comparable to the etch resistance of the imprint resist, thereby promoting etch uniformity. In certain cases, a pretreatment composition is selected such that the interfacial surface energy at an interface between the pretreatment and air exceeds that of the imprint resist used in conjunction with the pretreatment composition, thereby promoting rapid spreading of the liquid imprint resist on the liquid pretreatment composition to form a uniform composite coating on the substrate before the composite coating is contacted with the template. The interfacial surface energy between the pretreatment composition and air typically exceeds that between the imprint resist and air or between at least a component of the imprint resist and air by 1 mN/m to 25 mN/m, 1 mN/m to 15 mN/m, or 1 mN/m to 7 mN/m, although these ranges may vary based on chemical and physical properties of the pretreatment composition and the imprint resist and the resulting interaction between these two liquids. When the difference between surface energies is too low, limited spreading of the imprint resist results, and the drops maintain a spherical cap-like shape and remain separated by the pretreatment composition. When the difference between surface energies is too high, excessive spreading of the imprint resist results, with most of the imprint resist moving toward the adjacent drops, emptying the drop centers, such that the composite coating has convex regions above the drop centers. Thus, when the difference between surface energies is too low or too high, the resulting composite coating is nonuniform, with significant concave or convex regions. When the difference in surface energies is appropriately selected, the imprint resist spreads quickly to yield a substantially uniform composite coating. Advantageous selection of the pretreatment composition and the imprint resist allows fill time to be reduced by 50-90%, such that filling can be achieved in as little as 1 sec, or in some cases even as little as 0.1 sec.

Referring to operation 402 of process 400, FIG. 5A depicts substrate 102 including base 500 and adhesion layer 502. Base 500 is typically a silicon wafer. Other suitable materials for base 500 include fused silica, quartz, silicon germanium, gallium arsenide, and indium phosphide. Adhesion layer 502 serves to increase adhesion of the polymeric layer to base 500, thereby reducing formation of defects in the polymeric layer during separation of the template from the polymeric layer after polymerization of the composite coating. A thickness of adhesion layer 502 is typically between 1 nm and 10 nm. Examples of suitable materials for adhesion layer 502 include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,759,407; 8,361,546; 8,557,351; 8,808,808; and 8,846,195, all of which are incorporated by reference herein. In one example, an adhesion layer is formed from a composition including ISORAD 501, CYMEL 303ULF, CYCAT 4040 or TAG 2678 (a quaternary ammonium blocked trifluoromethanesulfonic acid), and PM Acetate (a solvent consisting of 2-(1-methoxy)propyl acetate available from Eastman Chemical Company of Kingsport. Tenn.). In some cases, substrate 102 includes one or more additional layers between base 500 and adhesion layer 502. In certain cases, substrate 102 includes one or more additional layers on adhesion layer 502. For simplicity, substrate 102 is depicted as including only base 500 and adhesion layer 502.

FIG. 5B depicts pretreatment composition 504 after the pretreatment composition has been disposed on substrate 102 to form pretreatment coating 506. As depicted in FIG. 5B, pretreatment coating 506 is formed directly on adhesion layer 502 of substrate 102. In some cases, pretreatment coating 506 is formed on another surface of substrate 102 (e.g., directly on base 500). Pretreatment coating 506 is formed on substrate 102 using techniques such as spin-coating, dip coating, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), physical vapor deposition (PVD). In the case of, for example, spin-coating or dip coating and the like, the pretreatment composition can be dissolved in one or more solvents (e.g., propylene glycol methyl ether acetate (PGMEA), propylene glycol monomethyl ether (PGME), and the like) for application to the substrate, with the solvent then evaporated away to leave the pretreatment coating. A thickness t_pof pretreatment coating 506 is typically between 1 nm and 100 nm (e.g., between 1 nm and 50 nm, between 1 nm and 25 nm, or between 1 nm and 10 nm).

Referring again to FIG. 4, operation 404 of process 400 includes disposing drops of imprint resist on the pretreatment coating, such that each drop of the imprint resist covers a target area of the substrate. A volume of the imprint resist drops is typically between 0.6 pL and 30 pL, and a distance between drop centers is typically between 35 μm and 350 μm. In some cases, the volume ratio of the imprint resist to the pretreatment is between 1:1 and 15:1. In operation 406, a composite coating is formed on the substrate as each drop of the imprint resist spreads beyond its target area, forming a composite coating. As used herein, “prespreading” refers to the spontaneous spreading of the drops of imprint resist that occurs between the time when the drops initially contact the pretreatment coating and spread beyond the target areas, and the time when the template contacts the composite coating.

FIGS. 6A-6D depict top-down views of drops of imprint resist on pretreatment coating at the time of disposal of the drops on target areas, and of the composite coating before, during, and at the end of drop spreading. Although the drops are depicted in a square grid, the drop pattern is not limited to square or geometric patterns.

FIG. 6A depicts a top-down view of drops 600 on pretreatment coating 506 at the time when the drops are initially disposed on the pretreatment coating, such that the drops cover but do not extend beyond target areas 602. After drops 600 are disposed on pretreatment coating 506, the drops spread spontaneously to cover a surface area of the substrate larger than that of the target areas, thereby forming a composite coating on the substrate. FIG. 6B depicts a top-down view of composite coating 604 during prespreading (after some spreading of drops 600 beyond the target areas 602), and typically after some intermixing of the imprint resist and the pretreatment. As depicted, composite coating 604 is a mixture of the liquid pretreatment composition and the liquid imprint resist, with regions 606 containing a majority of imprint resist (“enriched” with imprint resist), and regions 608 containing a majority of pretreatment (“enriched” with pretreatment). As prespreading progresses, composite coating 604 may form a more homogeneous mixture of the pretreatment composition and the imprint resist.

Spreading may progress until one or more of regions 606 contacts one or more adjacent regions 606. FIGS. 6C and 6D depict composite coating 604 at the end of spreading. As depicted in FIG. 6C, each of regions 606 has spread to contact each adjacent region 606 at boundaries 610, with regions 608 reduced to discrete (non-continuous) portions between regions 606. In other cases, as depicted in FIG. 6D, regions 606 spread to form a continuous layer, such that regions 608 are not distinguishable. In FIG. 6D, composite coating 604 may be a homogenous mixture of the pretreatment composition and the imprint resist.

FIGS. 7A-7D are cross-sectional views along lines w-w, x-x, y-y, and z-z of FIGS. 6A-D, respectively. FIG. 7A is a cross-sectional view along line w-w of FIG. 6A, depicting drops of imprint resist 600 covering a surface area of substrate 102 corresponding to target areas 602. Each target area (and each drop as initially disposed) has a center as indicated by line c-c, and line b-b indicates a location equidistant between the centers of two target areas 602. For simplicity, drops 600 are depicted as contacting adhesion layer 502 of substrate 102, and no intermixing of the imprint resist and the pretreatment composition is depicted. FIG. 7B is a cross-sectional view along line x-x of FIG. 6B, depicting composite coating 604 with regions 608 exposed between regions 606, after regions 606 have spread beyond target areas 602. FIG. 7C is a cross-sectional view along line y-y of FIG. 6C at the end of prespreading, depicting composite coating 604 as a homogeneous mixture of the pretreatment composition and imprint resist. As depicted, regions 606 have spread to cover a greater surface of the substrate than in FIG. 7B, and regions 608 are correspondingly reduced. Regions 606 originating from drops 600 are depicted as convex, however, composite coating 604 may be substantially planar or include concave regions. In certain cases, prespreading may continue beyond that depicted in FIG. 7C, with the imprint resist forming a continuous layer over the pretreatment (with no intermixing or with full or partial intermixing). FIG. 7D is a cross-sectional view along line z-z of FIG. 6D, depicting composite coating 604 as a homogenous mixture of the pretreatment composition and the imprint resist at the end of spreading, with concave regions of the composite coating about drop centers cc meeting at boundaries 610, such that the thickness of the polymerizable coating at the drop boundaries exceeds the thickness of the composite coating of the drop centers. As depicted in FIGS. 7C and 7D, a thickness of composite coating 604 at a location equidistant between the centers of two target areas may differ from a thickness of the composite coating at the center of one of the two target areas when the composite coating is contacted with the nanoimprint lithography template.

Referring again to FIG. 4, operations 408 and 410 of process 400 include contacting the composite coating with a template, and polymerizing the composite coating to yield a nanoimprint lithography stack having a composite polymeric layer on the nanoimprint lithography substrate, respectively.

In some cases, as depicted in FIGS. 7C and 7D, composite coating 604 is a homogeneous mixture or substantially homogenous mixture (e.g., at the air-composite coating interface) at the end of prespreading (i.e., just before the composite coating is contacted with the template). As such, the template contacts a homogenous mixture, with a majority of the mixture typically derived from the imprint resist. Thus, the release properties of the imprint resist would generally govern the interaction of the composite coating with the template, as well as the separation of the polymeric layer from the template, including defect formation (or absence thereof) due to separation forces between the template and the polymeric layer.

As depicted in FIGS. 8A and 8B, however, composite coating 604 may include regions 608 and 606 that are enriched with the pretreatment composition and enriched with the imprint resist, respectively, such that template 110 contacts regions of composite coating 604 having different physical and chemical properties. For simplicity, the imprint resist in regions 606 is depicted as having displaced the pretreatment coating, such that regions 606 are in direct contact with the substrate, and no intermixing is shown. Thus, the pretreatment composition in regions 608 is non-uniform in thickness. In FIG. 8A, the maximum height p of regions 606 exceeds the maximum height i of the pretreatment composition, such that template 110 primarily contacts regions 606. In FIG. 8B maximum height i of regions 608 exceeds the maximum height p of the imprint resist, such that template 110 primarily contacts regions 608. Thus, separation of template 110 from the resulting composite polymeric layer and the defect density associated therewith is nonuniform and based on the different interactions between the template and the imprint resist and between the template and the pretreatment composition. Thus, for certain pretreatment compositions (e.g., pretreatment compositions that include a single monomer or a mixture of two or more monomers, but no surfactant), it may be advantageous for the composite coating to form a homogenous mixture, or at least a substantially homogenous mixture at the gas-liquid interface at which the template contacts the composite coating.

FIGS. 9A-9C and 10A-10C are cross-sectional views depicting template 110 and composite coating 604 on substrate 102 having base 500 and adhesion layer 502 before and during contact of the composite coating with the template, and after separation of the template from the composite polymeric layer to yield a nanoimprint lithography stack. In FIGS. 9A-9C, composite coating 604 is depicted as a homogeneous mixture of the pretreatment composition and the imprint resist. In FIGS. 10A-10C, composite coating 604 is depicted as an inhomogeneous mixture of the pretreatment composition and the imprint resist.

FIG. 9A depicts a cross-sectional view of initial contact of template 110 with homogeneous composite coating 900 on substrate 102. In FIG. 9B, template 110 has been advanced toward substrate 102 such that composite coating 900 fills recesses of template 110. After polymerization of composite coating 900 to yield a homogeneous polymeric layer on substrate 102, template 110 is separated from the polymeric layer. FIG. 9C depicts a cross-sectional view of nanoimprint lithography stack 902 having homogeneous composite polymeric layer 904.

FIG. 10A depicts a cross-sectional view of initial contact of template 110 with composite coating 604 on substrate 102. Inhomogeneous composite coating 1000 includes regions 606 and 608. As depicted, little or no intermixing has occurred between the imprint resist in region 606 and the pretreatment composition in region 608. In FIG. 10B, template 110 has been advanced toward substrate 102 such that composite coating 1000 fills recesses of template 110. After polymerization of composite coating 1000 to yield an inhomogeneous polymeric layer on substrate 102, template 110 is separated from the polymeric layer. FIG. 10C depicts a cross-sectional view of nanoimprint lithography stack 1002 having inhomogeneous polymeric layer 1004 with regions 1006 and 1008 corresponding to regions 606 and 608 of inhomogeneous composite coating 1000. Thus, the chemical composition of composite polymeric layer 1002 is inhomogeneous or non-uniform, and includes regions 1006 having a composition derived from a mixture enriched with the imprint resist and regions 1008 having a composition derived from a mixture enriched with the pretreatment composition. The relative size (e.g., exposed surface area, surface area of template covered, or volume) of regions 1006 and 1008 may vary based at least in part on the extent of prespreading before contact of the composite coating with the template or spreading due to contact with the template. In some cases, regions 1006 may be separated or bounded by regions 1008, such that composite polymeric layer 1002 includes a plurality of center regions separated by boundaries, with the chemical composition of the composite polymeric layer 1004 at the boundaries differing from the chemical composition of the composite polymeric layer at the interior of the center regions.

In some cases, after polymerization of a composite coating in an imprint lithography process, a portion of the pretreatment composition may remain uncured (e.g., pretreatment composition beyond the boundaries of an imprinted field). The presence of the uncured pretreatment composition may be disadvantageous for a variety of reasons. In one example, the presence of uncured pretreatment composition may cause defects in an imprint lithography process if the pretreatment composition is allowed to spread onto a composited polymeric layer (an imprinted field). In another example, evaporation of uncured pretreatment composition may contaminate portions of the nanoimprint lithography substrate or portions of the equipment in which the imprinting is performed. By removing uncured pretreatment composition remaining on a nanoimprint lithography substrate after polymerization of the composite polymerizable coating, disadvantages associated with the presence of uncured pretreatment composition may be avoided.

As described herein, application of a pretreatment composition to a substrate typically includes covering a surface of the substrate that is to be imprinted via a spin-coating process to yield an uncured pretreatment coating on the substrate. As such, any area of the substrate that is not subsequently covered with imprint resist may remain covered with uncured pretreatment coating after polymerization of the composite polymerizable coating. As depicted in FIG. 11 with respect to nanoimprint lithography substrate 1100, uncured pretreatment coating 1102 may be found in the relatively small gaps (the “street”) between adjacent imprints 1104 or in the relatively larger unimprinted areas 1106 at the edge of the substrate (e.g., partial fields with an area below some minimum value). Uncured pretreatment coating may be problematic, for example, if it spreads or evaporates at a later time. In one example, uncured pretreatment coating may spread onto imprinted areas 1104 of substrate 1100, causing defects such as line collapse. In another example, uncured pretreatment coating may evaporate during storage or during subsequent process steps. Evaporation during storage may result in contamination of storage containers, other substrates, or both. During subsequent process steps, any pretreatment coating that evaporates or spreads may contaminate substrate handling equipment or process environments. The presence of evaporated pretreatment coating in a process chamber may negatively impact a subsequent process step, such as an etch step or a deposition process, by altering etch rate, layer uniformity, or both.

Uncured pretreatment coating as depicted in FIG. 11 or uncured pretreatment composition on other areas of a nanoimprint lithography substrate may be removed via a variety of post-imprint methods, including heating the nanoimprint lithography substrate at an elevated temperature to evaporate the uncured pretreatment composition (e.g., by heating on a hotplate, in an oven, or in a batch treatment process), removing the uncured pretreatment composition under vacuum, removing the uncured pretreatment via excitation with electromagnetic radiation (e.g., laser irradiation), and rinsing the nanoimprint lithography substrate with an organic rinsing liquid to wash away an uncured portion of the pretreatment coating. The post-imprint methods are selected to avoid damage to the composite polymeric layer (the “cured imprint”), for example, by heating to a temperature below the glass transition temperature of the imprint resist. Advantages associated with vacuum treatment include maintaining the nanoimprint lithography substrate at room temperature or at a temperature lower than a temperature required to evaporate the pretreatment composition at atmospheric pressure. Vacuum treatment can also be performed in a batch process.

Electromagnetic irradiation is advantageously performed in such a way as to avoid damaging the cured composite polymeric layer. A preferred embodiment is to use a laser in order to allow fine spatial control on what areas of the substrate are irradiated. The space between cured imprints where uncured pretreatment composition may remain can be as small as a few micrometers in width, so a small spot size is useful to avoid irradiating cured imprinted material. Various types of lasers may be used for removal of uncured pretreatment composition. The wavelength of the laser should be selected based on the optical properties of the pretreatment composition and the cured composite polymeric layer. Preferred types of electromagnetic radiation for this application include deep ultraviolet light, infrared light, and microwaves. In particular, CO₂lasers with a wavelength of about 10.6 μm are suitable because almost all radiation can be absorbed. Nd:YAG lasers at about 1.064 μm may also be used and typically have better beam quality than CO₂lasers. Diode lasers are also suitable, owing to their high efficiency, low costs, compact design, high robustness, and ability to be fiber coupled. Other irradiation sources, such as blanket exposure systems, are also suitable, given the difference in the volatility or stability of the uncured pretreatment composition and the cured composite polymeric layer. In some cases, microwave irradiation, for example, may be more difficult to confine spatially to the uncured areas of the substrate. Care must be taken, however, not to damage the patterned composite polymeric layer and any other structures in the nanoimprint lithography substrate (e.g., metal layers from previous process steps).

There is no particular limitation in the organic rinsing liquid, as long as it does not dissolve a resist pattern, and a solution including a general organic solvent may be used. As for the rinsing liquid, a rinsing liquid containing at least one of an organic solvent selected from the group consisting of a hydrocarbon-based solvent, a ketone-based solvent, an ester-based solvent, an alcohol-based solvent, an amide-based solvent, and an ether-based solvent may be preferably used.

Examples of suitable hydrocarbon-based solvents include aromatic hydrocarbon-based solvents such as toluene and xylene, and aliphatic hydrocarbon-based solvents such as pentane, hexane, octane, and decane.

Examples of suitable ketone-based solvents include 1-octanone, 2-octanone, 1-nonanone, 2-nonanone, acetone, 2-heptanone (methyl amyl ketone), 4-heptanone, 1-hexanone, 2-hexanone, diisobutyl ketone, cyclohexanone, methylcyclohexanone, phenylacetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, acetyl acetone, acetonyl acetone, ionone, diacetonyl alcohol, acetyl carbinol, acetophenone, methyl naphthyl ketone, isophorone, propylene carbonate, and the like.

Examples of suitable ester-based solvents include methyl acetate, butyl acetate, ethyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, pentyl acetate, isopentyl acetate, amyl acetate, propylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate, ethylene glycol monoethyl ether acetate, diethylene glycol monobutyl ether acetate, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether acetate, ethyl-3-ethoxypropionate, 3-methoxybutyl acetate, 3-methyl-3-methoxybutyl acetate, methyl formate, ethyl formate, butyl formate, propyl formate, ethyl lactate, butyl lactate, propyl lactate, and the like.

Examples of suitable alcohol-based solvents include alcohols such as methyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol, n-propyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, n-butyl alcohol, sec-butyl alcohol, t-butyl alcohol, isobutyl alcohol, n-hexyl alcohol, n-heptyl alcohol, n-octyl alcohol; and n-decanol; glycol-based solvents such as ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, and triethylene glycol; glycol ether-based solvents such as ethylene glycol monomethyl ether, propylene glycol monomethyl ether, ethylene glycol monoethyl ether, propylene glycol monoethyl ether, diethylene glycol monomethyl ether, triethylene glycol monoethyl ether, and methoxymethyl butanol, and the like.

As the amide-based solvent, it is possible to use, for example, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, N,N-dimethylacetamide, N,N-dimethylformamide, hexamethylphosphoric triamide, 1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone, and the like.

Examples of suitable ether-based solvents include, in addition to the glycol ether-based solvents, dioxane, tetrahydrofuran, and the like.

Among them, the organic rinsing liquid is preferably 4-methyl-2-pentanol or butyl acetate.

A water content in the organic rinsing liquid is preferably 10% by mass or less, more preferably 5% by mass or less, and particularly preferably 3% by mass or less. By setting the water content to 10%, by mass or less, good washing characteristics may be obtained.

The vapor pressure of the organic rinsing liquid ranges preferably from 0.05 kPa to 5 kPa, more preferably from 0.1 kPa to 5 kPa, and most preferably from 0.12 kPa to 3 kPa, at 20° C. By setting the vapor pressure of the rinsing liquid to range from 0.05 kPa to 5 kPa at 20° C., the temperature uniformity in the wafer plane is improved, and furthermore, swelling caused by permeation of the rinsing liquid is suppressed; consequently, the dimensional uniformity in the wafer plane is improved.

In the organic rinsing liquid, a surfactant described herein may be added and used in an appropriate amount.

The surfactant is not particularly limited but, for example, ionic or nonionic fluorine-based surfactant, silicon-based surfactant, and the like, or any combination thereof, may be used. Examples of the fluorine and silicon-based surfactants include surfactants described in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Nos. S62-36663, S61-226746, S61-226745, S62-170950, S63-34540, H7-230165, H8-62834, H9-54432 and H9-5988, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,405,720, 5,360,692, 5,529,881, 5,296,330, 5,436,098, 5,576,143, 5,294,511, and 5,824,451. In some cases, a nonionic surfactant is preferred. The nonionic surfactant is not particularly limited, but a fluorine-based surfactant or a silicon-based surfactant is more preferably used.

The amount of the surfactant in use ranges usually from 0.001% by mass to 5% by mass, preferably from 0.005% by mass to 2% by mass, and more preferably from 0.01% by mass to 0.5% by mass, based on the total amount of the organic rinsing liquid.

In the rinsing step, the uncured portion of the pretreatment coating on the nanoimprint lithography substrate is washed away by using the above-described rinsing liquid including an organic solvent. The method of washing treatment is not particularly limited, but it is possible to employ, for example, a method of continuously ejecting a rinsing liquid on a substrate spinning at a constant speed (spin coating method), a method of dipping a substrate in a bath filled with a rinsing liquid for a fixed time (dipping method), a method of spraying a rinsing liquid on a substrate surface (spraying method), and the like, and among them, it is preferred that the washing treatment is performed by the spin coating method and after the washing, the substrate is spun at a rotational speed from 2,000 rpm to 4,000 rpm to remove the rinsing liquid from the substrate. It is also preferred that a heating step (post baking) is included after the rinsing step. The rinsing liquid remaining between patterns and in the inside of the pattern is removed by the baking. The heating step after the rinsing step is performed at usually 40° C. to 160° C., and preferably 70° C. to 95° C., for usually 10 sec to 3 min, and preferably 30 sec to 90 sec.

FIG. 12A is a flowchart showing process 1200 to remove an uncured portion of a pretreatment coating by post-imprint heating of a nanoimprint lithography substrate. In 1202, a composite polymerizable coating is polymerized to yield a composite polymeric layer and an uncured portion of the pretreatment coating. In 1204, after some or all of the substrate has been imprinted, the uncured portion of the pretreatment coating is removed by heating the nanoimprint lithography substrate to a temperature sufficient to evaporate the uncured portion of the pretreatment coating. The nanoimprint lithography substrate is typically heated to a temperature less than the glass transition temperature of the imprint resist, to avoid heat damage to the composite polymeric layer.

FIG. 12B is a flowchart showing process 1210 to remove an uncured portion of a pretreatment coating by post-imprint vacuum treatment to evaporate the uncured pretreatment composition from the nanoimprint lithography substrate. In 1212, a composite polymerizable coating is polymerized to yield a composite polymeric layer and an uncured portion of the pretreatment coating. In 1214, after some or all of the substrate has been imprinted, the nanoimprint lithography substrate is vacuum-treated to remove the uncured portion of the pretreatment coating.

FIG. 12C is a flowchart showing process 1220 to remove an uncured portion of a pretreatment coating by irradiating the uncured portion of the pretreatment coating with electromagnetic radiation to remove the uncured pretreatment composition. In 1222, the composite polymerizable coating is polymerized to yield a composite polymeric layer and an uncured portion of the pretreatment coating. In 1224, after some or all of the substrate has been imprinted, the uncured portion of the pretreatment coating is irradiated with electromagnetic radiation to remove the uncured portion of the pretreatment coating.

Examples

In the Examples below, the reported interfacial surface energy at the interface between the imprint resist and air was measured by the maximum bubble pressure method. The measurements were made using a BP2 bubble pressure tensiometer manufactured by Krüss GmbH of Hamburg, Germany. In the maximum bubble pressure method, the maximum internal pressure of a gas bubble which is formed in a liquid by means of a capillary is measured. With a capillary of known diameter, the surface tension can be calculated from the Young-Laplace equation. For the some of the pretreatment compositions, the manufacturer's reported values for the interfacial surface energy at the interface between the pretreatment composition and air are provided.

The viscosities were measured using a Brookfield DV-II+ Pro with a small sample adapter using a temperature-controlled bath set at 23° C. Reported viscosity values are the average of five measurements.

Adhesion layers were prepared on substrates formed by curing an adhesive composition made by combining about 77 g ISORAD 501, about 22 g CYMEL 303ULF, and about 1 g TAG 2678, introducing this mixture into approximately 1900 grams of PM Acetate. The adhesive composition was spun onto a substrate (e.g., a silicon wafer) at a rotational velocity between 500 and 4,000 revolutions per minute so as to provide a substantially smooth, if not planar layer with uniform thickness. The spun-on composition was exposed to thermal actinic energy of 160° C. for approximately two minutes. The resulting adhesion layers were about 3 nm to about 4 nm thick.

In Comparative Example 1 and Examples 1-3, an imprint resist with a surface tension of 33 mN/m at an air/imprint resist interface was used to demonstrate spreading of the imprint resist on various surfaces. The imprint resist was a polymerizable composition including about 45 wt % monofunctional acrylate (e.g., isobornyl acrylate and benzyl acrylate), about 48 wt % difunctional acrylate (e.g., neopentyl glycol diacrylate), about 5 wt % photoinitiator (e.g., TPO and 4265), and about 3 wt % surfactant (e.g., a mixture of X—R—(OCH₂CH₂)_nOH, where R=alkyl, aryl, or poly(propylene glycol), X═H or —(OCH₂CH₂)_nOH, and n is an integer (e.g., 2 to 20, 5 to 15, or 10 to 12) (e.g., X═—(OCH₂CH₂)_nOH, R=poly(propylene glycol), and n=10 to 12) and Y—R—(OCH₂CH₂)_nOH, where R=alkyl, aryl, or poly(propylene glycol), Y=a fluorinated chain (perfluorinated alkyl or perfluorinated ether) or poly(ethylene glycol) capped with a fluorinated chain, and n is an integer (e.g., 2 to 20, 5 to 15, or 10 to 12) (e.g., Y=poly(ethylene glycol) capped with a perfluorinated alkyl group, R=poly(propylene glycol), and n=10 to 12).

In Comparative Example 1, the imprint resist was disposed directly on the adhesion layer of a nanoimprint lithography substrate. FIG. 13 is an image of drops 1300 of the imprint resist on the adhesion layer 1302 of a substrate 1.7 sec after dispensation of the drops in a lattice pattern was initiated. As seen in the image, drops 1300 have spread outward from the target areas on the substrate. However, spreading beyond the target area was limited, and the area of the exposed adhesion layer 1302 exceeded that of drops 1300. Rings visible in this and other images, such as ring 1304, are Newton interference rings, which indicate a difference in thickness in various regions of the drop. Resist drop size was approximately 2.5 pL. FIG. 13 has a 2×7 (pitch)²interleaved lattice of drops (e.g., 2 units in the horizontal direction, with 3.5 units between the lines). Each following line shifted 1 unit in the horizontal direction.

In Examples 1-3, pretreatment compositions A-C, respectively, were disposed on a nanoimprint lithography substrate to form a pretreatment coating. Drops of the imprint resist were disposed on the pretreatment coatings. FIGS. 14-16 show images of the composite coating after dispensation of drops of the imprint resist was initiated. Although intermixing occurs between the pretreatment composition and imprint resist in these examples, for simplicity, the drops of imprint resist and pretreatment coating are described below without reference to intermixing. The pretreatment composition was disposed on a wafer substrate via spin-on coating. More particularly, the pretreatment composition was dissolved in PGMEA (0.3 wt % pretreatment composition/99.7 wt % PGMEA) and spun onto the wafer substrate. Upon evaporation of the solvent, the typical thickness of the resultant pretreatment coating on the substrate was in the range from 5 nm to 10 nm (e.g., 8 nm). Resist drop size was approximately 2.5 pL in FIGS. 14-16FIGS. 14 and 16 have a 2×7 (pitch)²interleaved lattice of drops (e.g., 2 units in the horizontal direction, with 3.5 units between the lines). Each following line shifted 1 unit in the horizontal direction. FIG. 15 shows a 2×6 (pitch)²interleaved lattice of drops. The pitch value was 84.5 μm. The ratios of the volumes of resist to the pretreatment layer were in the range of 1 to 15 (e.g., 6-7).

Table 1 lists the surface tension (air/liquid interface) for the pretreatment compositions A-C and the imprint resist used in Examples 1-3.

TABLE 1

Surface Tension for Pretreatment Compositions

Pretreatment
Imprint resist
Difference in

Exam-
Pretreatment
surface tension
surface tension
surface tension

ple
composition
(mN/m)
(mN/m)
(mN/m)

1
A (Sartomer
34
33
1

492)

2
B (Sartomer
36.4
33
3.1

351HP)

3
C (Sartomer
39.9
33
6.9

399LV)

In Example 1, drops of the imprint resist were disposed on a substrate having a coating of pretreatment composition A (Sartomer 492 or “SR492”). SR492, available from Sartomer, Inc. (Pennsylvania, US), is propoxylated (3) trimethylolpropane triacrylate (a multifunctional acrylate). FIG. 14 shows an image of drops 1400 of the imprint resist on pretreatment coating 1402 and the resulting composite coating 1404 1.7 seconds after dispensation of the discrete portions in an interleaved lattice pattern was initiated. In this example, the drop retains its spherical cap-like shape and the spreading of the imprint resist is limited. As seen in FIG. 14, while spreading of the drops 1400 exceeds that of the imprint resist on the adhesion layer in Comparative Example 1, the drops remain separated by pretreatment coating 1402, which forms boundaries 1406 around the drops. Certain components of the imprint resist spread beyond the drop centers, forming regions 1408 surrounding drops 1400. Regions 1408 are separated by pretreatment coating 1402. The limited spreading is attributed at least in part to the small difference in surface tension (1 mN/m) between pretreatment composition A and the imprint resist, such that there is no significant energy advantage for spreading of the drops. Other factors, such as friction, are also understood to influence the extent of spreading.

In Example 2, drops of the imprint resist were disposed on a substrate having a coating of pretreatment composition B (Sartomer 351HP or “SR351HP”). SR351HP, available from Sartomer, Inc. (Pennsylvania, US), is trimethylolpropane triacrylate (a multifunctional acrylate). FIG. 15 shows images of drops 1500 of the imprint resist on pretreatment coating 1502 and the resulting composite coating 1504 1.7 sec after dispensation of the drops in a square lattice pattern was initiated. After 1.7 sec, drops 1500 cover the majority of the surface area of the substrate, and are separated by pretreatment coating 1502, which forms boundaries 1506 around the drops. Drops 1500 are more uniform than drops 1400 of Example 1, and thus significant improvement is observed over the spreading in Example 1. The greater extent of spreading is attributed at least in part to the greater difference in surface tension (3.1 mN/m) between pretreatment composition B and the imprint resist than pretreatment A and the imprint resist of Example 1.

In Example 3, drops of the imprint resist were disposed on a substrate having a coating of pretreatment composition C (Sartomer 399LV or “SR399LV”). SR399LV, available from Sartomer, Inc. (Pennsylvania, US), is dipentaerythritol pentaacrylate (a multifunctional acrylate). FIG. 16 shows an image of drops 1600 of the imprint resist on pretreatment coating 1602 and the resulting composite coating 1604 1.7 sec after dispensation of the drops in a triangular lattice pattern was initiated. As seen in FIG. 16, drops 1600 are separated at boundaries 1606 by pretreatment coating 1602. However, most of the imprint resist is accumulated at the drop boundaries, such that most of the polymerizable material is at the drop boundaries, and the drop centers are substantially empty. The extent of spreading is attributed at least in part to the large difference in surface tension (6.9 mN/m) between pretreatment composition C and the imprint resist.

Defect density was measured as a function of prespreading time for the imprint resist of Examples 1-3 and pretreatment composition B of Example 2. FIG. 17 shows defect density (voids) due to non-filling of the template. Plot 1700 shows defect density (number of defects per cm²) as a function of spread time (sec) for 28 nm line/space pattern regions, with the defect density approaching 0.1/cm²at 0.9 sec. Plot 1702 shows defect density (number of defects per cm²) as a function of spread time (sec) over the whole field having a range of feature sizes with the defect density approaching 0.1/cm²at 1 sec. By way of comparison, with no pretreatment, a defect density approaching 0.1/cm²is typically achieved for the whole field at a spread time between 2.5 sec and 3.0 sec.

Properties of pretreatment compositions PC1-PC9 are shown in Table 2. A key for PC1-PC9 is shown below. Viscosities were measured as described herein at a temperature of 23° C. To calculate the diameter ratio (Diam. Ratio) at 500 ms as shown in Table 2, drops of imprint resist (drop size ˜25 pL) were allowed to spread on a substrate coated with a pretreatment composition (thickness of about 8 nm to 10 nm) on top of an adhesion layer, and the drop diameter was recorded at an elapsed time of 500 ms. The drop diameter with each pretreatment composition was divided by the drop diameter of the imprint resist on an adhesion layer with no pretreatment composition at 500 ms. As shown in Table 2, the drop diameter of the imprint resist on PC1 at 500 ms was 60% more than the drop diameter of imprint resist on an adhesion layer with no pretreatment coating. FIG. 18 shows drop diameter (μm) as a function of time (ms) for pretreatment compositions PC1-PC9. Relative etch resistance is the Ohnishi parameter of each pretreatment composition divided by the Ohnishi parameter of the imprint resist. Relative etch resistance of PC1-PC9 (the ratio of etch resistance of the pretreatment composition to the etch resistance of the imprint resist) is shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2

Properties of Pretreatment Compositions PC1-PC9

Surface
Viscosity
Diam.

Pretreatment
Tension
(cP)
Ratio
Rel. Etch

Composition
(mN/m)
at 23° C.
at 500 ms
Resistance

PC1
36.4 ± 0.1
111 ± 1
1.59
1.3

PC2
37.7 ± 0.1
66.6 ± 0.3
1.86
1.5

PC3
33.9 ± 0.1
15.5 ± 0.1
2.46
1.1

PC4
41.8 ± 0.1
64.9 ± 0.3
1.92
1.9

PC5
38.5 ± 0.3
18.4 ± 0.1
2.73
1.7

PC6
NA
NA
1.75
0.9

PC7
35.5 ± 0.3
8.7 ± 0.1
2.36
1.1

PC8
39.3 ± 0.1
10.0 ± 0.1
2.69
0.9

PC9
38.6 ± 0.1
143 ± 1
1.95
0.9

Imprint
33

1.00
1.0

Resist

PC1: trimethylolpropane triacrylate (Sartomer)

PC2: trimethylolpropane ethoxylate triacrylate, n ~1.3 (Osaka Organic)

PC3: 1,12-dodecanediol diacrylate

PC4: poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate, Mn, avg = 575 (Sigma-Aldrich)

PC5: tetraethylene glycol diacrylate (Sartomer)

PC6: 1,3-adamantanediol diacrylate

PC7: nonanediol diacrylate

PC8: m-xylylene diacrylate

PC9: tricyclodecane dimethanol diacrylate (Sartomer)

Pretreatment compositions PC3 and PC9 were combined in various weight ratios to yield pretreatment compositions PC10-PC13 having the weight ratios shown in Table 3. Comparison of properties of PC3 and PC9 with mixtures formed therefrom revealed synergistic effects. For example, PC3 has relatively low viscosity and allows for relatively fast template filling, but has relatively poor etch resistance. In contrast, PC9 has relatively good etch resistance and film stability (low evaporative loss), but is relatively viscous and demonstrates relatively slow template filling. Combinations of PC3 and PC9, however, resulted in pretreatment compositions with a combination of advantageous properties, including relatively low viscosity, relatively fast template filling, and relatively good etch resistance. For example, a pretreatment composition having 30 wt % PC3 and 70 wt % PC9 was found to have a surface tension of 37.2 mN/m, a diameter ratio of 1.61, and an Ohnishi parameter of 3.5.

TABLE 3

Composition of Pretreatment Compositions PC10-PC13

Pretreatment
PC3
PC9

Composition
(wt %)
(wt %)

PC10
25
75

PC11
35
65

PC12
50
50

PC13
75
25

FIG. 19A shows a plot of viscosity for pretreatment compositions including various ratios of PC3 and PC9 (i.e., from 100 wt % PC3 to 100 wt % PC9). FIG. 19B shows drop diameter (measured as described with respect to Table 2) for PC3, PC13, PC12, PC11, PC10, and PC9. FIG. 19C shows surface tension (mN/m) versus fraction of PC3 and PC9.

Evaporation of uncured pretreatment composition was demonstrated by heating uncured pretreatment coatings on nanoimprint lithography substrates at temperatures less than 100° C. These temperatures were selected to be lower than typical imprint resist glass transition temperatures of, for example, 100-120° C. Coated substrates were contact baked on a CEE 10 bake plate from Brewer Science. FIG. 20 shows coating thickness of PC10 on an imprint lithography substrate versus heat treatment duration. Plots 2000, 2002, and 2004 show film thickness versus heat treatment duration for heating at 60° C., 80° C., and 90° C., respectively. A reduction in film thickness from about 30-35 nm to about 5 nm or less was observed for heating at 80° C. and 90° C. for 10 min. A reduction in film thickness from about 35 nm to about 25 nm was observed for heating at 60° C. for 10 min.

Post-imprint removal of uncured pretreatment composition was also demonstrated by evaporating uncured pretreatment coatings on nanoimprint lithography substrates in air and under vacuum. In FIG. 21, plots 2100 and 2102 show coating thickness of PC1 in air and under ˜0.01 mTorr vacuum, respectively. Coating thickness of PC1 decreased from about 6 nm to about 4 nm in less than 5 min under vacuum. Plots 2104 and 2106 show film thickness of coatings of PS3 in air and under ˜0.01 mTorr vacuum, respectively, with coating thickness decreasing from about 7 nm to about 1 nm in about 5 min under vacuum. Coating thickness of PC3 in air was essentially unchanged over 20 minutes. Plots 2108 and 2110 show coating thickness of a mixture of 75 wt % PC5 and 25 wt % PC9 in air and under ˜20 mTorr over time. The coating thickness of this mixture decreased slightly in air and from about 7 nm to about 4 nm in 5 min under vacuum. If the thickness trend for this mixture remains linear under vacuum, the coating would be expected to evaporate almost completely in about 10 min.

A number of embodiments have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.

Number	Name	Date	Kind
4720578	Liu	Jan 1988	A
5294511	Aoai	Mar 1994	A
5296330	Schulz	Mar 1994	A
5360692	Kawabe	Nov 1994	A
5391587	Wu	Feb 1995	A
5405720	Hosaka	Apr 1995	A
5436098	Schulz	Jul 1995	A
5529881	Kawabe	Jun 1996	A
5576143	Aoai	Nov 1996	A
5824451	Aoai	Oct 1998	A
6334960	Willson	Jan 2002	B1
6873087	Choi	Mar 2005	B1
6932934	Choi	Aug 2005	B2
6936194	Watts	Aug 2005	B2
7077992	Sreenivasan	Jul 2006	B2
7157036	Choi	Jan 2007	B2
7197396	Stopczynski	Mar 2007	B2
7365103	Willson et al.	Apr 2008	B2
7396475	Sreenivasan	Jul 2008	B2
7704643	Cole et al.	Apr 2010	B2
7759407	Xu	Jul 2010	B2
7837921	Xu	Nov 2010	B2
7939131	Xu et al.	May 2011	B2
8025833	Kodama	Sep 2011	B2
8076386	Xu	Dec 2011	B2
8202468	Zhu et al.	Jun 2012	B2
8288079	Ogino	Oct 2012	B2
8349241	Sreenivasan	Jan 2013	B2
8361546	Fletcher	Jan 2013	B2
8530540	Kodama	Sep 2013	B2
8557351	Xu	Oct 2013	B2
8637587	Xu	Jan 2014	B2
8808808	Xu	Aug 2014	B2
8846195	Xu	Sep 2014	B2
9263289	Hattori	Feb 2016	B2
20040065252	Sreenivasan	Apr 2004	A1
20040211754	Sreenivasan	Oct 2004	A1
20040256764	Choi et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20050112503	Kanda et al.	May 2005	A1
20070212494	Xu et al.	Sep 2007	A1
20080000373	Petrucci	Jan 2008	A1
20080000871	Suh et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080055581	Rogers	Mar 2008	A1
20080199816	Choi et al.	Aug 2008	A1
20080308971	Liu	Dec 2008	A1
20090053535	Xu et al.	Feb 2009	A1
20090085255	Tada	Apr 2009	A1
20090148619	LaBrake et al.	Jun 2009	A1
20090171127	Murata et al.	Jul 2009	A1
20100098940	Liu	Apr 2010	A1
20100099837	Murphy et al.	Apr 2010	A1
20100104852	Fletcher	Apr 2010	A1
20100155988	Keil et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100230385	Colburn et al.	Sep 2010	A1
20100276059	Tian et al.	Nov 2010	A1
20110031651	Xu et al.	Feb 2011	A1
20110129424	Berkland et al.	Jun 2011	A1
20120021180	Miyake et al.	Jan 2012	A1
20120225263	Kodama	Sep 2012	A1
20130172476	Sasamoto et al.	Jul 2013	A1
20130213930	Wakamatsu et al.	Aug 2013	A1
20140034229	Xu	Feb 2014	A1
20140050900	Kodama et al.	Feb 2014	A1
20140349425	Lee et al.	Nov 2014	A1
20150140227	Iida	May 2015	A1
20150218394	Kim et al.	Aug 2015	A1
20150228498	Hattori et al.	Aug 2015	A1
20160215074	Honma et al.	Jul 2016	A1
20160291463	Miyazawa	Oct 2016	A1
20160306276	Konno	Oct 2016	A1
20160363858	Shimatani	Dec 2016	A1
20170066208	Khusnatdinov et al.	Mar 2017	A1
20170068159	Khusnatdinov et al.	Mar 2017	A1
20170068161	Stachowiak et al.	Mar 2017	A1
20170282440	Stachowiak et al.	Oct 2017	A1
20170283620	Otani et al.	Oct 2017	A1
20170283632	Chiba et al.	Oct 2017	A1
20170285462	Ito	Oct 2017	A1
20170285463	Ito et al.	Oct 2017	A1
20170285464	Ito et al.	Oct 2017	A1
20170285465	Iimura et al.	Oct 2017	A1
20170285466	Chiba et al.	Oct 2017	A1
20170285479	Stachowiak et al.	Oct 2017	A1
20170287708	Liu et al.	Oct 2017	A1
20170371240	Liu et al.	Dec 2017	A1

Number	Date	Country
1212195	Jun 2002	EP
1808447	Sep 2010	EP
2007055235	Mar 2007	JP
2009503139	Jan 2009	JP
2009051017	Mar 2009	JP
2009208409	Sep 2009	JP
2010214859	Sep 2010	JP
2010530641	Sep 2010	JP
2011508680	Mar 2011	JP
2011096766	May 2011	JP
04929722	May 2012	JP
05463170	Jan 2014	JP
05483083	Feb 2014	JP
05498729	Mar 2014	JP
05511415	Apr 2014	JP
2014093385	May 2014	JP
05596367	Aug 2014	JP
05599648	Aug 2014	JP
2015070145	Apr 2015	JP
WO2008156750	Dec 2008	WO
WO2010021291	Feb 2010	WO
WO2011126131	Oct 2011	WO
WO2011155602	Dec 2011	WO
WO2012133955	Oct 2012	WO
WO2013191228	Dec 2013	WO
WO2015016851	Feb 2015	WO
WO2017044421	Mar 2017	WO
WO2017130853	Aug 2017	WO
WO2017175668	Oct 2017	WO

Removing substrate pretreatment compositions in nanoimprint lithography

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

CPC

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

US Referenced Citations (85)

Foreign Referenced Citations (29)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (16)

Related Publications (1)

Provisional Applications (1)

Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US17/39231, dated Sep. 29, 2017, 10 pages.
European Search Report for Application No. 16185680.2, dated Jan. 31, 2017, 10 pages.
Notice of the Reason for Refusal for JP Patent Application No. 2016-154767, dated Sep. 27, 2016, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US16/50400, dated Dec. 8, 2016, 10 pages.
Chou et al., Imprint of sub-25 nm vias and trenches in polymers. Applied Physics Letters 67(21):3114-3116, Nov. 20, 1995.
Chou et al., Nanoimprint lithography. Journal of Vacuum Science Technology B 14(6): 4129-4133, Nov./Dec. 1996.
Long et al., Materials for step and flash imprint lithography (S-FIL®). Journal of Materials Chemistry 17(34):3575-3580, Sep. 2007.
Sungjune Jung et al., The impact and spreading of a small liquid drop on a nonporous substrate over an extended time scale. Soft Matter 8(9):2686-2696, Feb. 2012.
Abia B. Afsar-Siddiqui et al., The spreading of surfactant solutions on thin liquid films. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 106:183-236, Dec. 2003.
M. Lenz et al., Surfactant Driven Flow of Thin Liquid Films, Universitat Bonn, 2002.
D. P. Gayer, III et al., The dynamics of a localized surfactant on a thin film. J. Fluid Mech. 213:127-148, Apr. 1990.
Dussaud, et al. Spreading characteristics of an insoluble surfactant film on a thin liquid layer: comparison between theory and experiment. J. Fluid Mech. 544:23-51, 2005.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/024570, dated Jun. 19, 2017, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/022917, dated Jun. 9, 2017, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/017829, dated Mar. 9, 2018, 15 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/024493, dated Jun. 27, 2017, 9 pages.