Request routing management based on network components

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9160703
  • Patent Number
    9,160,703
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 10, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 13, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
Systems and methods for managing requesting routing functionality associated with resource requests for one or more resources associated with a content provider are provided. A content delivery network (“CDN”) service provider, on behalf of a content provider, can process domain name service (“DNS”) requests for resources by computing devices and resolve the DNS requests by the identification of a network address of a computing device that will provide the requested resources. Based on the processing of DNS queries initiated by a client computing device, the CDN service provider can measure CDN service provider latencies associated with the generation of DNS requests by network components associated with the client computing devices. Examples of the network components can include DNS resolvers associated with the client computing device.
Description
BACKGROUND

Generally described, computing devices and communication networks can be utilized to exchange information. In a common application, a computing device can request content from another computing device via the communication network. For example, a user at a personal computing device can utilize a software browser application to request a Web page from a server computing device via the Internet. In such embodiments, the user computing device can be referred to as a client computing device and the server computing device can be referred to as a content provider.


Content providers are generally motivated to provide requested content to client computing devices often with consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the transmission of the content. For larger scale implementations, a content provider may receive content requests from a high volume of client computing devices which can place a strain on the content provider's computing resources. Additionally, the content requested by the client computing devices may have a number of components, which can further place additional strain on the content provider's computing resources.


With reference to an illustrative example, a requested Web page, or original content, may be associated with a number of additional resources, such as images or videos, which are to be displayed with the Web page. In one specific embodiment, the additional resources of the Web page are identified by a number of embedded resource identifiers, such as uniform resource locators (“URLs”). In turn, software on the client computing devices typically processes embedded resource identifiers to generate requests for the content. Often, the resource identifiers associated with the embedded resources reference a computing device associated with the content provider such that the client computing device would transmit the request for the additional resources to the referenced content provider computing device. Accordingly, in order to satisfy a content request, the content provider would provide client computing devices data associated with the Web page as well as the data associated with the embedded resources.


Some content providers attempt to facilitate the delivery of requested content, such as Web pages and/or resources identified in Web pages, through the utilization of a content delivery network (“CDN”) service provider. A CDN service provider typically maintains a number of computing devices in a communication network that can maintain content from various content providers. In turn, content providers can instruct, or otherwise suggest to, client computing devices to request some, or all, of the content provider's content from the CDN service provider's computing devices.


As with content providers, CDN service providers are also generally motivated to provide requested content to client computing devices often with consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the transmission of the content. Accordingly, CDN service providers often consider factors such as latency of delivery of requested content in order to meet service level agreements or to generally improve the quality of delivery service. Additionally, in embodiments in which computing devices utilize an Internet service provider (“ISP”) to provide connectivity, the CDN service provider can consider additional factors associated with the interaction between the CDN service provider, client computing and ISP devices, such as a DNS resolver component.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrative of content delivery environment including a number of client computing devices, a content provider, and a content delivery network service provider;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the registration of a content provider with a CDN service provider;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the generation of resource requests by a client computing device;



FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the generation of DNS queries by a client computing device corresponding to embedded resources by a client computing device;



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the generation of DNS queries by a client computing device corresponding to alternative identifiers by a client computing device;



FIG. 6 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the transmission of DNS queries by a client computing device in accordance with a network routing scheme by a client computing device;



FIG. 7 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the transmission of DNS queries by a client computing device in accordance with an alternative network routing scheme by a client computing device;



FIG. 8 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the transmission of DNS queries by a client computing device in accordance with an alternative network routing scheme by a client computing device; and



FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrative of a request routing processing routine implemented by a service provider.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Generally described, the present disclosure is directed to managing request routing functionality associated with resource requests for one or more resources associated with a content provider. Specifically, aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to the management and processing request of routing functionality by a service provider, such as a content delivery network (“CDN”) service provider, on behalf of a content provider. Illustratively, the request routing functionality can correspond to the processing of domain name service (“DNS”) requests for resources by computing devices and the resolution of the DNS requests by the identification of a network address of a computing device that will provide the requested resources. Based on the processing of DNS queries initiated by a client computing device, the CDN service provider can measure CDN service provider performance measurement information associated with the generation and processing of DNS requests by network components associated with the client computing devices. Examples of the network components can include DNS resolvers associated with the client computing device. Additionally, examples of performance measurement information can include the measurement of latencies associated with transmitting and processing the DNS queries, data packet loss associated with the transmittal of the DNS queries, data throughput associated with the transmittal of the DNS queries, available bandwidth associated with a communication channel and the like.


Although various aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to illustrative examples and embodiments, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the disclosed embodiments and examples should not be construed as limiting. For example, the present disclosure may be described with regard to request routing services provided by a service provider, such as a CDN service provider, that may provide additional services and functionality including network-based storage services, caching services, application hosting, or other services. However, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that a service provider need not provide all, or any, of the additional services or functionality that may be associated with some service providers, such as a CDN service provider.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrative of content delivery environment 100 for the managing registration of a content provider with a service provider, such as a CDN service provider, and subsequent processing of at least a portion of content requests on behalf of the content provider. As illustrated in FIG. 1, the content delivery environment 100 includes a number of client computing devices 102 (generally referred to as clients) for requesting content from a content provider 104, a network storage provider, and/or a CDN service provider 106. In an illustrative embodiment, the client computing devices 102 can correspond to a wide variety of computing devices including personal computing devices, laptop computing devices, hand-held computing devices, terminal computing devices, mobile devices, wireless devices, various electronic devices and appliances and the like. In an illustrative embodiment, the client computing devices 102 include necessary hardware and software components for establishing communications over a communication network 112, such as a wide area network or local area network. For example, the client computing devices 102 may be equipped with networking equipment and browser software applications that facilitate communications via the Internet or an intranet.


Illustratively, at least some of the client computing devices 102 utilize a DNS resolver component 108, such as a DNS name server, that receives DNS queries from a client computing device 102 and then generates the DNS queries attributed to the client computing device, or on behalf of the client computing device. In one embodiment, the DNS resolver component 108 may be a local DNS component provided by an enterprise network to which the client computing device 102 belongs. In another embodiment, the local DNS resolver component 108 may be provided by an Internet Service Provider (“ISP”) that provides the communication network connection to the client computing device 102. In embodiments in which the client computing devices 102 utilize a DNS resolver component 108, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the DNS queries generated on behalf of the client computing devices would be associated with the IP address of the DNS resolver component 108 in accordance with traditional networking protocols. In further embodiments, a client computing device 102 may be associated with multiple DNS resolver components 108, such as a multi-tiered hierarchy of DNS resolver components. For example, a client computing device 102 may be associated with a first DNS resolver component 108 provided by an enterprise network, which in turn is in communication with one or more DNS resolver components provided by an ISP. In other examples, a single network provider may make multiple DNS resolver components 108 available or responsive to the client computing device 102 DNS queries.


The content delivery environment 100 can also include a content provider 104 in communication with the one or more client computing devices 102 via the communication network 110. The content provider 104 illustrated in FIG. 1 corresponds to a logical association of one or more computing devices associated with a content provider. Specifically, the content provider 104 can include a web server component 112 corresponding to one or more server computing devices for obtaining and processing requests for content (such as Web pages) from the client computing devices 102. The content provider 104 can further include an origin server component 114 and associated storage component 116 corresponding to one or more computing devices for obtaining and processing requests for network resources. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the content provider 104 can be associated with various additional computing resources, such additional computing devices for administration of content and resources and the like. Additionally, although the origin server component 114 and associated storage component 116 are logically associated with the content provider 104, the origin server component 114 and associated storage components 116 may be geographically distributed throughout the communication network 112 in a manner to best serve various demographics of client computing devices 102.


Although not illustrated in FIG. 1, the content provider 104 can be associated with a number of additional or supplement components to facilitate interaction with client computing devices 102 or service providers. For example, a content provider 104 may maintain one or more DNS name server components that are operative to receive DNS queries related to registered domain names associated with the content provider 104. The one or more DNS name servers can be authoritative to resolve client computing device DNS queries corresponding to the registered domain names of the content provider 104. The content provider 104 can also maintain additional storage components, such as proxy servers, or utilize network storage service providers to maintain at least a portion of the content/resources provided to the client computing devices 102.


With continued reference to FIG. 1, the content delivery environment 100 can further include a service provider, generally referred to as the CDN service provider 106, in communication with the one or more client computing devices 102 and the content provider 104 via the communication network 110. The CDN service provider 106 illustrated in FIG. 1 corresponds to a logical association of one or more computing devices associated with a service provider. Specifically, the CDN service provider 106 can include a number of Point of Presence (“POP”) locations 118, 124 that correspond to nodes on the communication network 110. Each POP 118, 124 includes a DNS component 120, 126 made up of a number of DNS server computing devices for resolving DNS queries from the client computers 102. Each POP 118, 124 also optionally includes a resource cache component 122, 128 made up of a number of cache server computing devices for storing resources from content providers or network storage providers and transmitting various requested resources to various client computers 102. The DNS components 120, 126 and the resource cache components 122, 128 may further include additional software and/or hardware components that facilitate communications, including, but not limited to, load balancing or load sharing software/hardware components.


Still further, the CDN service provider 106 can include additional data stores for managing request routing information. Specifically, in an illustrative embodiment, the CDN service provider 106 can include a DNS resolver log data store 130 for maintaining information regarding DNS queries provided by the DNS resolvers 108 on behalf of client computing devices 102. As previously described, examples of performance measurement information can include latency information, data packet loss information, data throughput information, available bandwidth associated with a communication channel, and the like. Additionally, the DNS resolver log data can further include performance measurement information or other information associated with the transmittal or processing of DNS queries. Although the DNS resolver log data store 130 is illustrated as a single, centrally located data store, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the DNS resolver log data store 130 may be distributed among several data stores or be maintained, at least in part, among the POPs 118, 124.


In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS component 120, 126 and resource cache component 122, 128 are considered to be logically grouped, regardless of whether the components, or portions of the components, are physically separate. Additionally, although the POPs 118, 124 are illustrated in FIG. 1 as logically associated with the CDN service provider 106, the POPs will be geographically distributed throughout the communication network 110 in a manner to best serve various demographics of client computing devices 102. Additionally, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the CDN service provider 106 can be associated with various additional computing resources, such as additional computing devices for administration of content and resources, and the like. Even further, the components of the CDN service provider 106 can be managed by the same or different entities. One skilled in the relevant art will also appreciate that the components and configurations provided in FIG. 1 are illustrative in nature. Accordingly, additional or alternative components and/or configurations, especially regarding the additional components, systems and subsystems for facilitating communications may be utilized.


With reference now to FIGS. 2-8, the interaction between various components of the content delivery environment 100 of FIG. 1 will be illustrated. For purposes of the example, however, the illustration has been simplified such that many of the components utilized to facilitate communications are not shown. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that such components can be utilized and that additional interactions would accordingly occur without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.


With reference to FIG. 2, an illustrative interaction for the optional registration of a content provider 104 with the CDN service provider 106 for hosting content on behalf of the content provider 104 will be described. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the CDN service provider content registration process begins with registration of the content provider 104 with the CDN service provider 106. In an illustrative embodiment, the content provider 104 utilizes a registration application program interface (“API”) to register with the CDN service provider 106 such that the CDN service provider 106 can provide content on behalf of the content provider 104, or at least perform the processes described herein. Illustratively, the registration API can include the identification of the origin server 114 of the content provider 104 that may provide requested resources to the CDN service provider 106. In addition or alternatively, the registration API can include the content to be stored by the CDN service provider 106 on behalf of the content provider 104. Additionally, the content provider 104 can specify one or more network storage providers (not illustrated) that may act as an origin server for the content provider 104.


The CDN service provider 106 returns the embedded resource identifiers to the content provider 104 along with any additional information. In turn, the content provider 104 can then store the embedded resource identifiers for embedding in requested content or otherwise embed (or associate) the embedded resource identifiers with requested content (such as Web page markup language), which are described in greater detail below. In an illustrative embodiment, the embedded resource identifiers can be applicable to multiple content providers 104. Alternatively, the embedded resource identifiers can be unique to each particular content provider 104. Still further, the CDN service provider 106 may provide additional logic to the content providers 104 that controls the circumstances and/or methodologies for embedding the embedded resource identifiers into content. For example, the embedded resource identifiers can include instructions (or executable code) that defines the type of content (e.g., specific Web pages) for which the embedded resource identifiers will apply.


With reference now to FIG. 3, after completion of the registration and embedding processes illustrated in FIG. 2, a client computing device 102 generates a content request that is received and processed by the content provider 104, such as through the Web server 112. In accordance with an illustrative embodiment, the request for content can be in accordance with common network protocols, such as the hypertext transfer protocol (“HTTP”). Upon receipt of the content request, the content provider identifies the appropriate responsive content. In an illustrative embodiment, the requested content can correspond to a Web page that is displayed on the client computing device 102 via the processing of information, such as hypertext markup language (“HTML”), extensible markup language (“XML”), and the like. The requested content can also include a number of embedded resource identifiers that correspond to resource objects that should be obtained by the client computing device 102 as part of the processing of the requested content. The embedded resources can correspond to multi-media content, such as images, videos, text, etc. that will be processed by the client computing devices 102 and rendered on an output device. Although not illustrated in FIG. 3, the client computing device 102 would first issue a DNS query for the content provided by the content provider 104, which if properly resolved, would include the identification of the above mentioned IP address associated with the content provider. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the resolution of the DNS query may involve multiple DNS queries to either the content provider 104 or other service provider.


Generally, the identification of the embedded resources provided by the content provider 104 will be in the form of resource identifiers that can be processed by the client computing device 102, such as through a browser software application. In an illustrative embodiment, the resource identifiers can be in the form of a uniform resource locator (“URL”). For purposes of an illustrative example, the URL can identify a domain of the CDN service provider 106 (e.g., CDNserviceprovider.com), a name of a resource to be requested (e.g., “resource.xxx”) and a path where the resource will be found (e.g., “path”). Additionally, in an illustrative embodiment, the URL can also include one or more labels that include additional information utilized by the CDN service provider 106 in the request routing process (e.g., “additional_information”). Examples of the additional information can include client computing device identifiers, user account identifiers, geographic identification information, POP identifiers, DNS resolver performance measurement identification information, and the like. In this illustrative example, the URLs of the embedded resource have the form of:


http://additional_information.CDNserviceprovider.com/path/resource.xxx


With reference now to FIG. 4, upon receipt of the requested content, including the embedded resource identifiers provided by the CDN service provider 106, the client computing device 102 would first transmit a DNS query through its DNS resolver 108 to request an IP address of a computing device corresponding to the unique identifier provided by the CDN service provider 106. In accordance with traditional request routing principles, the DNS query would be received by the DNS resolver 108 and then transmitted on behalf of the requesting client computing device 102.


By way of example, in accordance with traditional DNS request routing principles, a DNS query for the URL http://additional_information.CDNserviceprovider.com/path/resource.xxx would first include the identification of a DNS server authoritative to the “.” and the “com” portions of the URL to the DNS resolver 108. The issuance of DNS queries corresponding to the “.” and the “com” portions of a URL are well known and have not been illustrated. After partially resolving the modified URL according to the “.” and “com” portions of the URL, the DNS resolver 108 then issues another DNS query for the resource URL that results in the identification of the DNS server corresponding to the “.CDNserviceprovider” portion of the URL, as illustrated in FIG. 4, illustrated as the DNS server component 120 of POP 118.


The receiving DNS server component 120 obtains the DNS query from the DNS resolver component 108 and processes the DNS query. In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server component 120 determines that the processing of the DNS query should be, at least in part, used to measure performance of the DNS resolver 108 or other network component. In one embodiment, the DNS query may not correspond to an actual resource that will be delivered to the client computing device 102. In this embodiment, the resolution of the DNS query may result in no response from a DNS server. In another embodiment, the resolution of the DNS query may result in the generation of additional actions/responses from the DNS server for purposes of performance measurement.


Alternatively, the DNS query may correspond to an actual resource provided by the CDN service provider 106 on behalf of the content provider 104. Illustratively, the “additional_information” portion of the URL may include information that will be utilized to determine whether the CDN service provider 106 should utilize the DNS query for performance measurement or will be utilized in the determination of the performance measurement. For example, a client computing device may execute a script prior to the generation of the DNS query that modifies the URL to include various identifiers or timing information to the URL.


To facilitate the performance measurement, the receiving POP, POP 118 can obtain information from the DNS query or collect additional information. The collected information can be maintained in the DNS resolver log data store 130. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate, that typically, a receiving DNS server can resolve DNS queries by identifying an IP address of a cache server component, such resource cache component 122, that will process the request for the requested resource. The selected resource cache component can process the request by either providing the requested resource if it is available or attempting to obtain the requested resource from another source, such as a peer cache server computing device or the origin server 114 of the content provider 104. However, in this illustrative embodiment, as an alternative to selecting a cache server component, the CDN service provider 106 can maintain sets of various alternative resource identifiers that can be utilized for more refined request routing purposes. Additionally, in this embodiment, the alternative resource identifiers can be utilized to measure the performance of the DNS resolver component 108 (or other network components). Specifically, the alternative resource identifiers can be provided by the CDN service provider 106 to the client computing device 102 such that a subsequent DNS query on the alternative resource identifier will resolve to a different DNS server component within the CDN service provider's network.


In an illustrative embodiment, the alternative resource identifiers are in the form of one or more canonical name (“CNAME”) records. In one embodiment, each CNAME record identifies a domain of the CDN service provider 106 (e.g., “cdnprovider.com” or “cdnprovider-1.com”). As will be explained in greater detail below, the domain in the CNAME does not need to be the same domain found in original URL or in a previous CNAME record. Additionally, each CNAME record includes additional information (e.g., “additional information”), such as request routing information, performance measurement information, and the like. An illustrative CNAME record can have the form of:


CNAME additional_information.cdnprovider.com


In an illustrative embodiment, the CNAME records are generated and provided by the DNS servers to direct DNS queries to a different DNS server of the CDN service provider 106. In one embodiment, the subsequent DNS queries (corresponding to the CNAME) will be directed, or otherwise be received by, a different DNS server of the CDN service provider 106. As will be explained in greater detail below, the CNAME can include additional request routing information that causes the DNS query to be received by a different POP or otherwise cause the subsequent DNS query to be forwarded to a DNS server at a different POP. In other embodiments, the subsequent DNS queries will be directed toward the same DNS server that received the previous DNS query.


In some embodiments, the selection of different DNS servers to receive one or more subsequent DNS queries may be based on a determined appropriateness of other DNS servers to process DNS queries from a particular client computing device 102 or set of client computing devices. As used in accordance with the present disclosure, appropriateness can be defined in any manner by the CDN service provider 106 for a variety of purposes. In one example, the CDN service provider 106 can attempt to direct DNS queries to DNS servers, such as in the returned CNAME, according to geographic criteria. The geographic criteria can correspond to geographic-based regional service plans contracted between the CDN service-provider 106 and the content provider 104 in which various CDN service provider 106 POPs are grouped into geographic regions. Accordingly, a client computing device 102 DNS query received in a region not corresponding to the content provider's regional plan may be better processed by a DNS server in a region corresponding to the content provider's regional plan. In this example, the DNS server component 118 may also obtain geographic information from the client directly (such as information provided by the client computing device or ISP) or indirectly (such as inferred through a client computing device's IP address).


In another example, the CDN service provider 106 can attempt to direct DNS queries to DNS servers according to service level criteria. The service level criteria can correspond to service or performance metrics contracted between the CDN service provider 106 and the content provider 104. Examples of performance metrics can include latencies of data transmission between the CDN service provider POPs and the client computing devices 102, total data provided on behalf of the content provider 104 by the CDN service provider POPs, error rates for data transmissions, and the like.


In still a further example, the CDN service provider 106 can attempt to direct DNS queries to DNS servers according to network performance criteria. The network performance criteria can correspond to measurements of network performance for transmitting data from the CDN service provider POPs to the client computing device 102. Examples of network performance metrics can include network data transfer latencies (measured by the client computing device or the CDN service provider 106, network data error rates, and the like).


In accordance with an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server maintains a data store that defines CNAME records for various original URLs. If a DNS query corresponding to a particular original URL matches an entry in the data store, the receiving DNS server component 120 returns a CNAME record as defined in the data store. In an illustrative embodiment, the data store can include multiple CNAME records corresponding to a particular original URL. The multiple CNAME records would define a set of potential candidates that can be returned to the client computing device 102. In such an embodiment, the DNS server component 120, either directly or via a network-based service, can implement additional logic in selecting an appropriate CNAME from a set of possible of CNAMEs. For example, the DNS servers can have logic to determine which CNAME to return for purposes of testing different components or aspects of the CDN service provider 106. Examples of such different aspects can include testing different software application platforms, testing different supported languages, testing different ISPs, and the like. In an illustrative embodiment, each DNS server component 120, 126 maintains the same data stores that define CNAME records, which can be managed centrally by the CDN service provider 106. Alternatively, each DNS server component 120, 126 can have POP specific data stores that define CNAME records, which can be managed centrally by the CDN service provider 106 or locally at the POP 118, 124.


The returned CNAME can also include request routing information that is different from or in addition to the information provided in URL/CNAME of the current DNS query. For example, if the CNAME selection is based on regional plan, a specific regional plan can be identified in the “request_routing_information” portion of the specific CNAME record. A similar approach could be taken to identify service level plans and file management by including a specific identifier in the “request_routing_information” portion of the CNAME record. In another embodiment, request routing information can be found in the identification of a CDN service provider 106 domain different from the domain found in the current URL/CNAME. For example, if the CNAME is based on regional plan, a specific regional plan domain (e.g., “cdnprovider-region1.com”) could be used in the domain name portion of the specific CNAME record. Any additional request routing information can be prepended to the existing request routing information in the current URL/CNAME such that the previous request routing information would not be lost (e.g., serviceplan.regionalplan.cdnprovider.com). One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that additional or alternative techniques and/or combination of techniques may be used to include the additional request routing information in the CNAME record that is selected by the DNS server component 120.


With reference now to FIG. 5, in an illustrative embodiment, the DNS resolver 108 obtains the CNAME, or other alternative identifier, provided by the receiving DNS server and processes the CNAME. In one aspect, the DNS resolver 108 can process the return information to log or determine performance measurement information, such as a total time from the transmittal of the original DNS query. Additionally, in accordance with network principles, the DNS resolver 108 then transmits a DNS query corresponding to the returned CNAME. As previously discussed with regard to FIG. 4, the DNS query process could first start with DNS queries for the “.” and “com” portions, followed by a query for the “cdnserviceprovider” portion of the CNAME. To the extent, however, that the results of a previous DNS queries can be cached (and remain valid), the DNS resolver 108 can utilize the cached information and does not need to repeat the entire process. However, at some point, depending on whether the CNAME provided by DNS server component 120 (FIG. 4) and the previous URL/CNAME share common CDN service provider domains, resolves to a different POP provided by the CDN service provider 106.


As illustrated in FIG. 5, the DNS server component 126 of POP 124 is now authoritative based on the different information in the current CNAME previously provided by the DNS server component 120. As previously described, the DNS server component 126 can then determine whether to resolve the DNS query on the CNAME with an IP address of a cache component that will process the content request or whether to provide another alternative resource identifier selected in the manner described above. In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server components can utilize a variety of information in selecting a resource cache component. In one example, the DNS server component can default to a selection of a resource cache component of the same POP. In another example, the DNS server components can select a resource cache component based on various load balancing or load sharing algorithms. Still further, the DNS server components can utilize network performance metrics or measurements to assign specific resource cache components. The IP address selected by a DNS server component may correspond to a specific caching server in the resource cache. Alternatively, the IP address can correspond to a hardware/software selection component (such as a load balancer).


Based on the processes illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5, the CDN service provider 106, DNS resolver 108 or other component can utilize performance measurement information for a variety of purposes. For example, the collected performance measurement information can be utilized to determine an ordered priority of POPs for a particular DNS resolver component 108 or sets of DNS resolver components. In another example, the performance measurement information can be utilized to verify an existing prioritization of POPs for a particular DNS resolver component 108 or sets of DNS resolver components. Still further, the performance measurement information can be combined with other information mapping client computing devices 102 with DNS resolver components 108 to determine prioritized or optimized POPs for client computing devices 102 or groups of client computing devices associated with one or more DNS resolvers 108.


With reference now to FIG. 6, in another embodiment to measure performance measurement after the receipt of content including one or more embedded identifiers (FIG. 3), the client computing device 102 would first transmit a DNS query through its DNS resolver 108 to request an IP address of a computing device corresponding to the unique identifier provided by the CDN service provider 106. The DNS query would be received by the DNS resolver 108 and then transmitted on behalf of the requesting client computing device 102.


As previously described with regard to FIG. 4, by way of example, in accordance with traditional DNS request routing principles, a DNS query for the URL would first include the identification of a DNS server authoritative to the “.” and the “com” portions of the URL to the DNS resolver 108. The issuance of DNS queries corresponding to the “.” and the “com” portions of a URL are well known and have not been illustrated. After partially resolving the modified URL according to the “.” and “com” portions of the URL, the DNS resolver 108 then issues another DNS query for the resource URL that results in the identification of the DNS server corresponding to the “.cdnserviceprovider” portion of the URL. Specifically, the successful resolution of the “.cdnserviceprovider” portion of the original URL identifies a network address, such as an IP address, of a DNS server associated with the CDN service provider 106. In this embodiment, the IP address can be shared by one or more POPs. Accordingly, the further DNS query to the shared IP address utilizes a one-to-many network routing schema, such as anycast, such that a specific POP will receive the request as a function of network topology. For example, in an anycast implementation, a DNS query issued by a client computing device 102 to a shared IP address will arrive at a DNS server component logically having the shortest network topology distance, often referred to as network hops, from the client computing device. The network topology distance does not necessarily correspond to geographic distance. However, in some embodiments, the network topology distance can be inferred to be the shortest network distance between a client computing device 102 and a POP.


As previously discussed with regard to FIG. 4, the receiving DNS server component 120 obtains the DNS query from the DNS resolver component 108 and processes the DNS query. In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server component 120 determines that the processing of the DNS query should be, at least in part, used to measure performance of the DNS resolver 108 or other network component. In one embodiment, the DNS query may not correspond to an actual resource that will be delivered to the client computing device 102. Alternatively, the DNS query may correspond to an actual resource provided by the CDN service provider 106 on behalf of the content provider 104. Illustratively, the “additional_information” portion of the URL may include information that will be utilized to determine whether the CDN service provider 106 should utilize the DNS query for performance measurement or whether it will be utilized in the determination of the performance measurement. For example, a client computing device may execute a script prior to the generation of the DNS query that modifies the URL to include various identifiers or timing information in the URL.


To facilitate the performance measurement, the receiving POP, POP 118 can obtain information from the DNS query or collect additional information. The collected information can be maintained in the DNS resolver log data store 130. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that, typically, a receiving DNS server can resolve DNS queries by identifying an IP address of a cache server component, such resource cache component 122, that will process the request for the requested resource. The selected resource cache component can process the request by either providing the requested resource if it is available or attempting to obtain the requested resource from another source, such as a peer cache server computing device or the origin server 114 of the content provider 104. However, in this illustrative embodiment, as an alternative to selecting a cache server component, the CDN service provider 106 can maintain sets of various alternative resource identifiers that can be utilized for more refined request routing purposes. Additionally, in this embodiment, the alternative resource identifiers can be utilized to measure the performance of the DNS resolver component 108 (or other network components). Specifically, the alternative resource identifiers can be provided by the CDN service provider 106 to the client computing device 102 such that a subsequent DNS query on the alternative resource identifier will resolve to a different DNS server component within the CDN service provider's network. As previously discussed, the alternative resource identifier can correspond to a CNAME.


With reference now to FIG. 7, in an illustrative embodiment, the DNS resolver 108 obtains the CNAME, or other alternative identifier, provided by the receiving DNS server and processes the CNAME. In one aspect, the DNS resolver 108 can process the return information to log or determine performance measurement information, such as a total time from the transmittal and processing of the original DNS query, available bandwidth, packet loss, data throughput, etc. Additionally, in accordance with network principles, the DNS resolver 108 then transmits a DNS query corresponding to the returned CNAME. As previously discussed with regard to FIG. 4, the DNS query process could first start with DNS queries for the “.” and “com” portions, followed by a query for the “.cdnserviceprovider” portion of the CNAME. To the extent, however, that the results of a previous DNS queries can be cached (and remain valid), the DNS resolver 108 can utilize the cached information and does not need to repeat the entire process. However, in this embodiment, at some point, the DNS resolver 108 transmits a DNS query for the “cdnserviceprovider” utilizing a different network routing schema. Specifically, in an illustrative embodiment, the further DNS query to a shared IP address or unique IP address utilizes a one-to-one network routing schema, such as unicast, such that a specific POP will receive the DNS query.


In this embodiment, the CNAME is selected such that the subsequent DNS query will be received by the same POP utilizing the different network routing schema. Examples of different routing schemas can include the utilization of different communication protocols, such as anycast and unicast. In other examples, the routing schema can include the specification of different communication network paths or the utilization of different ISPs. For example, the IP address of the DNS servers of the CDN service provider may be selected such that the first and second DNS queries (and possibly additional DNS queries) may be transmitted via different communication network ISPs. In another example, a communication protocol, such as the Border Gateway Protocol, can be manipulated to facilitate the transmission of DNS queries along different communication network paths. As illustrated in FIG. 7, the DNS server component 120 of POP 118 is again authoritative based on the information in the current CNAME previously provided by the DNS server component 118. As previously described, the DNS server component 120 can then determine whether to resolve the DNS query on the CNAME with an IP address of a cache component that will process the content request or whether to provide another alternative resource identifier selected in the manner described above. In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server components can utilize a variety of information in selecting a resource cache component. In one example, the DNS server component can default to a selection of a resource cache component of the same POP. In another example, the DNS server components can select a resource cache component based on various load balancing or load sharing algorithms. Still further, the DNS server components can utilize network performance metrics or measurements to assign specific resource cache components. The IP address selected by a DNS server component may correspond to a specific caching server in the resource cache. Alternatively, the IP address can correspond to a hardware/software selection component (such as a load balancer).


With reference now to FIG. 8, in an alternative to the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 7, the CNAME is selected such that the subsequent DNS query will be received by a different POP utilizing the different network routing schema. Accordingly, as illustrated in FIG. 8, the DNS server component 126 of POP 124 is now authoritative based on the different information in the current CNAME previously provided by the DNS server component 120. As previously described, the DNS server component 126 can then determine whether to resolve the DNS query on the CNAME with an IP address of a cache component that will process the content request or whether to provide another alternative resource identifier selected in the manner described above. In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server components can utilize a variety of information in selecting a resource cache component. In one example, the DNS server components can default to a selection of a resource cache component of the same POP. In another example, the DNS server components can select a resource cache component based on various load balancing or load sharing algorithms. Still further, the DNS server components can utilize network performance metrics or measurements to assign specific resource cache components. The IP address selected by a DNS server component may correspond to a specific caching server in the resource cache. Alternatively, the IP address can correspond to a hardware/software selection component (such as a load balancer).


Based on the processes illustrated in FIGS. 6, 7 and 8, the CDN service provider, DNS resolver 108 or other component can utilize performance measurement information for a variety of purposes. For example, the collected performance measurement information can be utilized to determine an ordered priority of routing schemas utilized to access particular POPs. In another example, the performance measurement information can be utilized to verify an existing prioritization of POPs for a particular DNS resolver component 108 or sets of DNS resolver components. Still further, the performance measurement information can be combined with other information mapping client computing devices 102 with DNS resolver components 108 to determine prioritized or optimized POPs for client computing devices 102 or groups of client computing devices associated with one or more DNS resolvers 108.


With reference now to FIG. 9, a request routing processing routine 900 implemented by the CDN service provider 106 will be described. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that actions/steps outlined for routine 900 may be implemented by one or many computing devices/components that are associated with the CDN service provider 106. Accordingly, routine 900 has been logically associated as being performed by the CDN service provider 106.


At block 902, one of the DNS server components 120, 126 obtains a DNS query corresponding to resource identifier (the “receiving DNS server”). As previously discussed, the resource identifier can be a URL that has been embedded in content requested by the client computing device 102 and previously provided by the content provider 104. Alternatively, the resource identifier can also correspond to a CNAME provided by a content provider DNS server in response to a DNS query previously received from the client computing device 102. At block 904, the receiving DNS server obtains DNS resolver 108 identification information from the DNS query, such as an IP address or other identifier.


At decision block 906, a test is conducted to determine whether the current DNS server is authoritative to resolve the DNS query. In one illustrative embodiment, the DNS server can determine whether it is authoritative to resolve the DNS query if there are no CNAME records corresponding to the received resource identifier (e.g., no additional performance measurement will take place).


If the current DNS server is authoritative (including a determination that the same DNS server will be authoritative for subsequent DNS queries), the current DNS server resolves the DNS query by returning the IP address of a cache server component at block 908. In a non-limiting manner, a number of methodologies for selecting an appropriate resource cache component have been previously discussed. Additionally, as described above, the IP address may correspond to a specific cache server of a resource cache component or generally to group of cache servers.


Alternatively, if at decision block 906, the DNS server is not authoritative, at block 910, the DNS server component selects and transmits an alternative resource identifier. As described above, the DNS server component can utilize a data store to identify an appropriate CNAME as a function of the current DNS query. Additionally, the DNS server component can also implement additional logical processing to select from a set of potential CNAMES. As previously described, in one embodiment, the CNAME may be selected to direct the DNS resolver 108 to a different POP. In another embodiment, the CNAME may be selected to direct the DNS resolver 108 to utilize a different request routing schema, regardless of whether the subsequent CNAME DNS query is directed to the same or different DNS server. At block 912, different DNS server components receive a DNS query corresponding to the CNAME. The routine 900 then returns to decision block 906 and continues to repeat as appropriate.


It will be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art that there are a number of ways to modify the routing information associated with requests from a class of client computing devices. It will further be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art that the timing at which performance is monitored and updates to routing information are made can vary.


It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that all of the functions described in this disclosure may be embodied in software executed by one or more processors of the disclosed components and mobile communication devices. The software may be persistently stored in any type of non-volatile storage.


Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.


Any process descriptions, elements, or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those skilled in the art. It will further be appreciated that the data and/or components described above may be stored on a computer-readable medium and loaded into memory of the computing device using a drive mechanism associated with a computer-readable medium storing the computer executable components such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, or network interface; further, the component and/or data can be included in a single device or distributed in any manner. Accordingly, general purpose computing devices may be configured to implement the processes, algorithms and methodology of the present disclosure with the processing and/or execution of the various data and/or components described above.


It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: obtaining, by a service provider, a first domain name service (DNS) query for content from a network component;transmitting, by the service provider, an alternative identifier responsive to the first DNS query from the network component, the alternative identifier to cause the network component to transmit a second DNS query to a component associated with the service provider;obtaining, by the service provider, the second DNS query for content from the network component responsive to the alternative identifier provided by the service provider; anddetermining, by the service provider, performance measurement information corresponding to obtaining the first and second DNS queries.
  • 2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the alternative identifier corresponds to a canonical name record.
  • 3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the first DNS query is associated with at least one embedded resource identifier.
  • 4. The method as recited in claim 3, wherein the alternative identifier references a domain different from a domain associated with the at least one embedded resource identifier.
  • 5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the alternative identifier includes a label representative of request routing information identifying the component associated with the service provider.
  • 6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the alternative identifier further includes a label representative of additional information associated with the client computing device.
  • 7. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the network component corresponds to a DNS resolver component.
  • 8. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the first and second DNS queries are obtained at a same identifiable component of the service provider.
  • 9. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the first and second DNS queries are obtained at separately identifiable components of the service provider.
  • 10. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the performance measurement information corresponds to latency information associated with at least one of the transmittal or processing of the first and second DNS queries.
  • 11. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the performance measurement information corresponds to at least one of a bandwidth associated with at least one of the transmittal and processing of the first and second DNS queries, packet loss information associated with the first and second DNS queries, or throughput information associated with the first and second DNS queries.
  • 12. A computer-implemented system comprising: a data store for storing performance monitoring information associated with network components associated with client computing device requests for content; anda computing system in communication with said data store and associated with a service provider, the computing system including at least one hardware processor operative to: obtain a first domain name service (DNS) query for content from a network component;transmit an alternative identifier responsive to the first DNS query from the network component, the alternative identifier to cause the network component to transmit a second DNS query to the service provider;obtain the second DNS query for content from the network component responsive to the alternative identifier provided by the service provider; anddetermine performance information corresponding to obtaining the first and second DNS queries.
  • 13. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the alternative identifier corresponds to a canonical name record.
  • 14. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the first DNS query is associated with at least one embedded resource identifier.
  • 15. The system as recited in claim 14, wherein the alternative identifier references a domain corresponding to a domain associated with the at least one embedded resource identifier.
  • 16. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the alternative identifier further includes timestamp information.
  • 17. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the first and second DNS queries are obtained at a same identifiable component of the service provider.
  • 18. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the first and second DNS queries are obtained at separately identifiable components of the service provider.
  • 19. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the performance measurement information corresponds to latency information associated with at least one of the transmittal or processing of the first and second DNS queries.
  • 20. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing computer executable instructions that when executed by a processor perform operations comprising: obtaining, by a service provider, a first domain name service (DNS) query for content from a network component;transmitting, by the service provider, an alternative identifier responsive to the first DNS query from the network component, the alternative identifier to cause the network component to transmit a second DNS query to a component associated with the service provide;obtaining, by the service provider, the second DNS query for content from the network component responsive to the alternative identifier provided by the service provider; and
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/892,889, entitled “REQUEST ROUTING MANAGEMENT BASED ON NETWORK COMPONENTS” and filed Sep. 28, 2010, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (813)
Number Name Date Kind
5341477 Pitkin et al. Aug 1994 A
5611049 Pitts Mar 1997 A
5701467 Freeston Dec 1997 A
5774660 Brendel et al. Jun 1998 A
5852717 Bhide et al. Dec 1998 A
5892914 Pitts Apr 1999 A
5893116 Simmonds et al. Apr 1999 A
5933811 Angles et al. Aug 1999 A
5974454 Apfel et al. Oct 1999 A
6016512 Huitema Jan 2000 A
6026452 Pitts Feb 2000 A
6052718 Gifford Apr 2000 A
6078960 Ballard Jun 2000 A
6085234 Pitts et al. Jul 2000 A
6098096 Tsirigotis et al. Aug 2000 A
6108703 Leighton et al. Aug 2000 A
6157942 Chu et al. Dec 2000 A
6167438 Yates et al. Dec 2000 A
6167446 Lister et al. Dec 2000 A
6182111 Inohara et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182125 Borella et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185598 Farber et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192051 Lipman et al. Feb 2001 B1
6205475 Pitts Mar 2001 B1
6223288 Byrne Apr 2001 B1
6243761 Mogul et al. Jun 2001 B1
6275496 Burns et al. Aug 2001 B1
6286043 Cuomo et al. Sep 2001 B1
6286084 Wexler et al. Sep 2001 B1
6304913 Rune Oct 2001 B1
6345308 Abe Feb 2002 B1
6351743 DeArdo et al. Feb 2002 B1
6351775 Yu Feb 2002 B1
6363411 Dugan et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366952 Pitts Apr 2002 B2
6374290 Scharber et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377257 Borrel et al. Apr 2002 B1
6386043 Mullins May 2002 B1
6405252 Gupta et al. Jun 2002 B1
6411967 Van Renesse Jun 2002 B1
6415280 Farber et al. Jul 2002 B1
6430607 Kavner Aug 2002 B1
6438592 Killian Aug 2002 B1
6452925 Sistanizadeh et al. Sep 2002 B1
6457047 Chandra et al. Sep 2002 B1
6459909 Bilcliff et al. Oct 2002 B1
6473804 Kaiser et al. Oct 2002 B1
6484143 Swildens et al. Nov 2002 B1
6505241 Pitts Jan 2003 B2
6523036 Hickman et al. Feb 2003 B1
6529910 Fleskes Mar 2003 B1
6529953 Van Renesse Mar 2003 B1
6553413 Lewin et al. Apr 2003 B1
6560610 Eatherton et al. May 2003 B1
6611873 Kanehara Aug 2003 B1
6643357 Lumsden Nov 2003 B2
6654807 Farber et al. Nov 2003 B2
6658462 Dutta Dec 2003 B1
6665706 Kenner et al. Dec 2003 B2
6678791 Jacobs et al. Jan 2004 B1
6681282 Golden et al. Jan 2004 B1
6694358 Swildens et al. Feb 2004 B1
6697805 Choquier et al. Feb 2004 B1
6724770 Van Renesse Apr 2004 B1
6732237 Jacobs et al. May 2004 B1
6754699 Swildens et al. Jun 2004 B2
6754706 Swildens et al. Jun 2004 B1
6760721 Chasen et al. Jul 2004 B1
6769031 Bero Jul 2004 B1
6782398 Bahl Aug 2004 B1
6785704 McCanne Aug 2004 B1
6795434 Kumar et al. Sep 2004 B1
6799214 Li Sep 2004 B1
6804706 Pitts Oct 2004 B2
6810291 Card et al. Oct 2004 B2
6810411 Coughlin et al. Oct 2004 B1
6829654 Jungck Dec 2004 B1
6862607 Vermeulen Mar 2005 B1
6874017 Inoue et al. Mar 2005 B1
6917951 Orbits et al. Jul 2005 B2
6928467 Peng Aug 2005 B2
6928485 Krishnamurthy et al. Aug 2005 B1
6941562 Gao et al. Sep 2005 B2
6963850 Bezos et al. Nov 2005 B1
6976090 Ben-Shaul et al. Dec 2005 B2
6981017 Kasriel et al. Dec 2005 B1
6985945 Farhat et al. Jan 2006 B2
6986018 O'Rourke et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990526 Zhu Jan 2006 B1
6996616 Leighton et al. Feb 2006 B1
7003555 Jungck Feb 2006 B1
7006099 Gut et al. Feb 2006 B2
7007089 Freedman Feb 2006 B2
7010578 Lewin et al. Mar 2006 B1
7010598 Sitaraman et al. Mar 2006 B2
7024466 Outten et al. Apr 2006 B2
7031445 Lumsden Apr 2006 B2
7032010 Swildens et al. Apr 2006 B1
7058706 Iyer et al. Jun 2006 B1
7058953 Willard et al. Jun 2006 B2
7065587 Huitema et al. Jun 2006 B2
7072982 Teodosiu et al. Jul 2006 B2
7076633 Tormasov et al. Jul 2006 B2
7082476 Cohen et al. Jul 2006 B1
7086061 Joshi et al. Aug 2006 B1
7092505 Allison et al. Aug 2006 B2
7092997 Kasriel et al. Aug 2006 B1
7096266 Lewin et al. Aug 2006 B2
7099936 Chase et al. Aug 2006 B2
7103645 Leighton et al. Sep 2006 B2
7114160 Suryanarayana et al. Sep 2006 B2
7117262 Bai et al. Oct 2006 B2
7133905 Dilley et al. Nov 2006 B2
7136922 Sundaram et al. Nov 2006 B2
7139821 Shah et al. Nov 2006 B1
7143169 Champagne et al. Nov 2006 B1
7143170 Swildens et al. Nov 2006 B2
7146560 Dang et al. Dec 2006 B2
7149809 Barde et al. Dec 2006 B2
7152118 Anderson, IV et al. Dec 2006 B2
7162539 Garcie-Luna-Aceves Jan 2007 B2
7174382 Ramanathan et al. Feb 2007 B2
7185063 Kasriel et al. Feb 2007 B1
7185084 Sirivara et al. Feb 2007 B2
7188214 Kasriel et al. Mar 2007 B1
7194522 Swildens et al. Mar 2007 B1
7200667 Teodosiu et al. Apr 2007 B2
7216170 Ludvig et al. May 2007 B2
7225254 Swildens et al. May 2007 B1
7228350 Hong et al. Jun 2007 B2
7228359 Monteiro Jun 2007 B1
7233978 Overton et al. Jun 2007 B2
7240100 Wein et al. Jul 2007 B1
7251675 Kamakura et al. Jul 2007 B1
7254626 Kommula et al. Aug 2007 B1
7254636 O'Toole, Jr. et al. Aug 2007 B1
7257581 Steele et al. Aug 2007 B1
7260598 Liskov et al. Aug 2007 B1
7260639 Afergan et al. Aug 2007 B2
7269784 Kasriel et al. Sep 2007 B1
7274658 Bornstein et al. Sep 2007 B2
7289519 Liskov Oct 2007 B1
7293093 Leighton et al. Nov 2007 B2
7308499 Chavez Dec 2007 B2
7310686 Uysal Dec 2007 B2
7316648 Kelly et al. Jan 2008 B2
7320131 O'Toole, Jr. Jan 2008 B1
7321918 Burd et al. Jan 2008 B2
7339937 Mitra et al. Mar 2008 B2
7363291 Page Apr 2008 B1
7363626 Koutharapu et al. Apr 2008 B2
7370089 Boyd et al. May 2008 B2
7373416 Kagan et al. May 2008 B2
7376736 Sundaram et al. May 2008 B2
7380078 Ikegaya et al. May 2008 B2
7392236 Rusch et al. Jun 2008 B2
7398301 Hennessey et al. Jul 2008 B2
7406512 Swildens et al. Jul 2008 B2
7406522 Riddle Jul 2008 B2
7430610 Pace et al. Sep 2008 B2
7441045 Skene et al. Oct 2008 B2
7454457 Lowery et al. Nov 2008 B1
7454500 Hsu et al. Nov 2008 B1
7461170 Taylor et al. Dec 2008 B1
7464142 Flurry et al. Dec 2008 B2
7478148 Neerdaels Jan 2009 B2
7492720 Pruthi et al. Feb 2009 B2
7496651 Joshi Feb 2009 B1
7499998 Toebes et al. Mar 2009 B2
7502836 Menditto et al. Mar 2009 B1
7519720 Fishman et al. Apr 2009 B2
7519726 Palliyil et al. Apr 2009 B2
7523181 Swildens et al. Apr 2009 B2
7543024 Holstege Jun 2009 B2
7548947 Kasriel et al. Jun 2009 B2
7552235 Chase et al. Jun 2009 B2
7555542 Ayers et al. Jun 2009 B1
7561571 Lovett et al. Jul 2009 B1
7565407 Hayball Jul 2009 B1
7568032 Feng et al. Jul 2009 B2
7573916 Bechtolsheim et al. Aug 2009 B1
7574499 Swildens et al. Aug 2009 B1
7581009 Hsu et al. Aug 2009 B1
7594189 Walker et al. Sep 2009 B1
7596619 Leighton et al. Sep 2009 B2
7617222 Coulthard et al. Nov 2009 B2
7623460 Miyazaki Nov 2009 B2
7624169 Lisiecki et al. Nov 2009 B2
7631101 Sullivan et al. Dec 2009 B2
7640296 Fuchs et al. Dec 2009 B2
7650376 Blumenau Jan 2010 B1
7653700 Bahl et al. Jan 2010 B1
7653725 Yahiro et al. Jan 2010 B2
7657613 Hanson et al. Feb 2010 B1
7657622 Douglis et al. Feb 2010 B1
7661027 Langen et al. Feb 2010 B2
7664879 Chan et al. Feb 2010 B2
7676570 Levy et al. Mar 2010 B2
7680897 Carter et al. Mar 2010 B1
7685251 Houlihan et al. Mar 2010 B2
7693813 Cao et al. Apr 2010 B1
7702724 Brydon et al. Apr 2010 B1
7706740 Collins et al. Apr 2010 B2
7707314 McCarthy et al. Apr 2010 B2
7711647 Gunaseelan et al. May 2010 B2
7711788 Lev Ran et al. May 2010 B2
7716367 Leighton et al. May 2010 B1
7725602 Liu et al. May 2010 B2
7730187 Raciborski et al. Jun 2010 B2
7739400 Lindbo et al. Jun 2010 B2
7747720 Toebes et al. Jun 2010 B2
7756913 Day Jul 2010 B1
7756965 Joshi Jul 2010 B2
7757202 Dahlstedt et al. Jul 2010 B2
7761572 Auerbach Jul 2010 B1
7765304 Davis et al. Jul 2010 B2
7769823 Jenny et al. Aug 2010 B2
7773596 Marques Aug 2010 B1
7774342 Virdy Aug 2010 B1
7787380 Aggarwal et al. Aug 2010 B1
7792989 Toebes et al. Sep 2010 B2
7809597 Das et al. Oct 2010 B2
7813308 Reddy et al. Oct 2010 B2
7814229 Cabrera et al. Oct 2010 B1
7818454 Kim et al. Oct 2010 B2
7827256 Phillips et al. Nov 2010 B2
7836177 Kasriel et al. Nov 2010 B2
7873065 Mukerji et al. Jan 2011 B1
7890612 Todd et al. Feb 2011 B2
7899899 Joshi Mar 2011 B2
7904875 Hegyi Mar 2011 B2
7912921 O'Rourke et al. Mar 2011 B2
7925782 Sivasubramanian et al. Apr 2011 B2
7930393 Baumback et al. Apr 2011 B1
7930402 Swildens et al. Apr 2011 B2
7930427 Josefsberg et al. Apr 2011 B2
7933988 Nasuto et al. Apr 2011 B2
7937477 Day et al. May 2011 B1
7945693 Farber et al. May 2011 B2
7949779 Farber et al. May 2011 B2
7958222 Pruitt et al. Jun 2011 B1
7958258 Yeung et al. Jun 2011 B2
7962597 Richardson et al. Jun 2011 B2
7966404 Hedin et al. Jun 2011 B2
7970816 Chess et al. Jun 2011 B2
7970940 van De Ven et al. Jun 2011 B1
7979509 Malmskog et al. Jul 2011 B1
7991910 Richardson et al. Aug 2011 B2
7996533 Leighton et al. Aug 2011 B2
7996535 Auerbach Aug 2011 B2
8000724 Rayburn et al. Aug 2011 B1
8010707 Elzur et al. Aug 2011 B2
8024441 Kommula et al. Sep 2011 B2
8028090 Richardson et al. Sep 2011 B2
8041773 Abu-Ghazaleh et al. Oct 2011 B2
8041809 Sundaram et al. Oct 2011 B2
8041818 Gupta et al. Oct 2011 B2
8065275 Eriksen et al. Nov 2011 B2
8069231 Schran et al. Nov 2011 B2
8073940 Richardson et al. Dec 2011 B1
8082348 Averbuj et al. Dec 2011 B1
8108623 Krishnaprasad et al. Jan 2012 B2
8117306 Baumback et al. Feb 2012 B1
8122098 Richardson et al. Feb 2012 B1
8122124 Baumback et al. Feb 2012 B1
8135820 Richardson et al. Mar 2012 B2
8156243 Richardson et al. Apr 2012 B2
8190682 Paterson-Jones et al. May 2012 B2
8195837 McCarthy et al. Jun 2012 B2
8224986 Liskov et al. Jul 2012 B1
8234403 Richardson et al. Jul 2012 B2
8239530 Sundaram et al. Aug 2012 B2
8250211 Swildens et al. Aug 2012 B2
8250219 Raciborski et al. Aug 2012 B2
8266288 Banerjee et al. Sep 2012 B2
8266327 Kumar et al. Sep 2012 B2
8280998 Joshi Oct 2012 B2
8281035 Farber et al. Oct 2012 B2
8291046 Farber et al. Oct 2012 B2
8291117 Eggleston et al. Oct 2012 B1
8301645 Crook Oct 2012 B1
8321568 Sivasubramanian et al. Nov 2012 B2
8402137 Sivasubramanian et al. Mar 2013 B2
8433749 Wee et al. Apr 2013 B2
8447876 Verma et al. May 2013 B2
8452874 MacCarthaigh et al. May 2013 B2
8463877 Richardson et al. Jun 2013 B1
8468222 Sakata et al. Jun 2013 B2
8468245 Farber et al. Jun 2013 B2
8473613 Farber et al. Jun 2013 B2
8478903 Farber et al. Jul 2013 B2
8504721 Hsu et al. Aug 2013 B2
8510428 Joshi Aug 2013 B2
8510807 Elazary et al. Aug 2013 B1
8521851 Richardson et al. Aug 2013 B1
8521908 Holmes et al. Aug 2013 B2
8526405 Curtis et al. Sep 2013 B2
8527658 Holmes et al. Sep 2013 B2
8572208 Farber et al. Oct 2013 B2
8572210 Farber et al. Oct 2013 B2
8577992 Richardson et al. Nov 2013 B1
8589996 Ma et al. Nov 2013 B2
8606996 Richardson et al. Dec 2013 B2
8615549 Knowles et al. Dec 2013 B2
8626950 Richardson et al. Jan 2014 B1
8639817 Sivasubramanian et al. Jan 2014 B2
8645539 McCarthy et al. Feb 2014 B2
8676918 Richardson et al. Mar 2014 B2
8683076 Farber et al. Mar 2014 B2
8688837 Richardson et al. Apr 2014 B1
8732309 Richardson et al. May 2014 B1
8756325 Sivasubramanian et al. Jun 2014 B2
8756341 Richardson et al. Jun 2014 B1
8782236 Marshall et al. Jul 2014 B1
8782279 Eggleston et al. Jul 2014 B2
8819283 Richardson et al. Aug 2014 B2
8924528 Richardson et al. Dec 2014 B1
8930513 Richardson et al. Jan 2015 B1
8930544 Richardson et al. Jan 2015 B2
8938526 Richardson et al. Jan 2015 B1
9003035 Richardson et al. Apr 2015 B1
9009286 Sivasubramanian et al. Apr 2015 B2
9021127 Richardson et al. Apr 2015 B2
9021128 Sivasubramanian et al. Apr 2015 B2
9021129 Richardson et al. Apr 2015 B2
9026616 Sivasubramanian et al. May 2015 B2
20010000811 May et al. May 2001 A1
20010025305 Yoshiasa Sep 2001 A1
20010032133 Moran Oct 2001 A1
20010034704 Farhat et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010049741 Skene et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010052016 Skene et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010056416 Garcia-Luna-Aceves Dec 2001 A1
20010056500 Farber et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020002613 Freeman et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020004846 Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020007413 Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010798 Ben-Shaul et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020048269 Hong et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049608 Hartsell et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049857 Farber et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020052942 Swildens et al. May 2002 A1
20020062372 Hong et al. May 2002 A1
20020068554 Dusse Jun 2002 A1
20020069420 Russell et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020078233 Biliris et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082858 Heddaya et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020083118 Sim Jun 2002 A1
20020083148 Shaw et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020087374 Boubez et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020091786 Yamaguchi et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020092026 Janniello et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099616 Sweldens Jul 2002 A1
20020099850 Farber et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020101836 Dorenbosch Aug 2002 A1
20020107944 Bai et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020112049 Elnozahy et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116481 Lee Aug 2002 A1
20020116491 Boyd et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120782 Dillon et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020124047 Gartner et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020124098 Shaw Sep 2002 A1
20020129123 Johnson et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020135611 Deosaran et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138286 Engstrom Sep 2002 A1
20020138437 Lewin et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143989 Huitema et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020147770 Tang Oct 2002 A1
20020147774 Lisiecki et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020150094 Cheng et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156911 Croman et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161767 Shapiro et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020163882 Bornstein et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020165912 Wenocur et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020169890 Beaumont et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020188722 Banerjee et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198953 O'Rourke et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030002484 Freedman Jan 2003 A1
20030009591 Hayball et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030026410 Lumsden Feb 2003 A1
20030028642 Agarwal et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030033283 Evans et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037139 Shteyn Feb 2003 A1
20030065739 Shnier Apr 2003 A1
20030074401 Connell et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030079027 Slocombe et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030093523 Cranor et al. May 2003 A1
20030099202 Lear et al. May 2003 A1
20030099237 Mitra et al. May 2003 A1
20030101278 Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. May 2003 A1
20030120741 Wu et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030133554 Nykanen et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030135509 Davis et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140087 Lincoln et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145038 Tariq et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145066 Okada et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030149581 Chaudhri et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030154239 Davis et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030154284 Bernardin et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030163722 Anderson, IV Aug 2003 A1
20030172145 Nguyen Sep 2003 A1
20030172183 Anderson, IV et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030172291 Judge et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030174648 Wang et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030182305 Balva et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030182413 Allen et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030182447 Schilling Sep 2003 A1
20030187935 Agarwalla et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030187970 Chase et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030191822 Leighton et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030200394 Ashmore et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204602 Hudson et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030229682 Day Dec 2003 A1
20030233423 Dilley et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030233445 Levy et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030233455 Leber et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236700 Arning et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040010563 Forte et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010621 Afergan et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019518 Abraham et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024841 Becker et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040030620 Benjamin et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040034744 Karlsson et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040039798 Hotz et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040044731 Chen et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044791 Pouzzner Mar 2004 A1
20040059805 Dinker et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040064501 Jan et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073596 Kloninger et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073707 Dillon Apr 2004 A1
20040073867 Kausik et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078468 Hedin et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078487 Cernohous et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040083283 Sundaram et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040083307 Uysal Apr 2004 A1
20040117455 Kaminsky et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128344 Trossen Jul 2004 A1
20040128346 Melamed et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040167981 Douglas et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167982 Cohen et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172466 Douglas et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040194085 Beaubien et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040194102 Neerdaels Sep 2004 A1
20040203630 Wang Oct 2004 A1
20040205149 Dillon et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040205162 Parikh Oct 2004 A1
20040215823 Kleinfelter et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040221019 Swildens et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040221034 Kausik et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040249939 Amini et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040249971 Klinker Dec 2004 A1
20040249975 Tuck et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254921 Cohen et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267906 Truty Dec 2004 A1
20040267907 Gustafsson Dec 2004 A1
20050010653 McCanne Jan 2005 A1
20050021706 Maggi et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021862 Schroeder et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027882 Sullivan et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038967 Umbehocker et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044270 Grove et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050102683 Branson et al. May 2005 A1
20050108169 Balasubramanian et al. May 2005 A1
20050108529 Juneau May 2005 A1
20050114296 Farber et al. May 2005 A1
20050117717 Lumsden Jun 2005 A1
20050132083 Raciborski et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050157712 Rangarajan et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050163168 Sheth et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050168782 Kobashi et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050171959 Deforche et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050188073 Nakamichi et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050192008 Desai et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050198334 Farber et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050198571 Kramer et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216569 Coppola et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216674 Robbin et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050229119 Torvinen Oct 2005 A1
20050232165 Brawn et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050259672 Eduri Nov 2005 A1
20050262248 Jennings, III et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050267991 Huitema et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050267992 Huitema et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050267993 Huitema et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278259 Gunaseelan et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283759 Peteanu et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283784 Suzuki Dec 2005 A1
20060013158 Ahuja et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020596 Liu et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020684 Mukherjee et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020714 Girouard et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020715 Jungck Jan 2006 A1
20060026067 Nicholas et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060026154 Altinel et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036720 Faulk, Jr. Feb 2006 A1
20060036966 Yevdayev Feb 2006 A1
20060037037 Miranz Feb 2006 A1
20060039352 Karstens Feb 2006 A1
20060041614 Oe Feb 2006 A1
20060047787 Agarwal et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060047813 Aggarwal et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060059246 Grove Mar 2006 A1
20060063534 Kokkonen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060064476 Decasper et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060064500 Roth et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074750 Clark et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060075084 Lyon Apr 2006 A1
20060075139 Jungck Apr 2006 A1
20060083165 McLane et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060085536 Meyer et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060088026 Mazur et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060112066 Hamzy May 2006 A1
20060112176 Liu et al. May 2006 A1
20060120385 Atchison et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129665 Toebes et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060143293 Freedman Jun 2006 A1
20060149529 Nguyen et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060155823 Tran et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060155862 Kathi et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161541 Cencini Jul 2006 A1
20060168088 Leighton et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060179080 Meek et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060184936 Abels et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190605 Franz et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060193247 Naseh et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195866 Thukral Aug 2006 A1
20060206568 Verma et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060206586 Ling et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060218265 Farber et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060218304 Mukherjee et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060227740 McLaughlin et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060227758 Rana et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060230137 Gare et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060233155 Srivastava Oct 2006 A1
20060253546 Chang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060253609 Andreev et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259581 Piersol Nov 2006 A1
20060259690 Vittal et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259984 Juneau Nov 2006 A1
20060265497 Ohata et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060265508 Angel et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060265516 Schilling Nov 2006 A1
20060265720 Cai et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271641 Stavrakos et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282522 Lewin et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060288119 Kim et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070005689 Leighton et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070005801 Kumar et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070005892 Mullender et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070011267 Overton et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070014241 Banerjee et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021998 Laithwaite et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070028001 Phillips et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070038729 Sullivan et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070038994 Davis et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070041393 Westhead et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070043859 Ruul Feb 2007 A1
20070050522 Grove et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070050703 Lebel Mar 2007 A1
20070055764 Dilley et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061440 Sundaram et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070076872 Juneau Apr 2007 A1
20070086429 Lawrence et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070094361 Hoynowski et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070101377 Six et al. May 2007 A1
20070118667 McCarthy et al. May 2007 A1
20070118668 McCarthy et al. May 2007 A1
20070134641 Lieu Jun 2007 A1
20070156919 Potti et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070162331 Sullivan Jul 2007 A1
20070168517 Weller et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174426 Swildens et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174442 Sherman et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174490 Choi et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070183342 Wong et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070198982 Bolan et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070204107 Greenfield et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208737 Li et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070219795 Park et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070220010 Ertugrul Sep 2007 A1
20070233705 Farber et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233706 Farber et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233846 Farber et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233884 Farber et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070244964 Challenger et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250467 Mesnik et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250560 Wein et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250601 Amlekar et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250611 Bhogal et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070253377 Janneteau et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070255843 Zubev Nov 2007 A1
20070263604 Tal Nov 2007 A1
20070266113 Koopmans et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070266311 Westphal Nov 2007 A1
20070266333 Cossey et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270165 Poosala Nov 2007 A1
20070271375 Hwang Nov 2007 A1
20070271385 Davis et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070280229 Kenney Dec 2007 A1
20070288588 Wein et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070291739 Sullivan et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080005057 Ozzie et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080008089 Bornstein et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080025304 Venkataswami et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080037536 Padmanabhan et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046550 Mazur et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046596 Afergan et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080065724 Seed et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065745 Leighton et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071859 Seed et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071987 Karn et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080072264 Crayford Mar 2008 A1
20080082551 Farber et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086574 Raciborski et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103805 Shear et al. May 2008 A1
20080104268 Farber et al. May 2008 A1
20080114829 Button et al. May 2008 A1
20080126706 Newport et al. May 2008 A1
20080134043 Georgis et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080140800 Farber et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147866 Stolorz et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147873 Matsumoto Jun 2008 A1
20080155061 Afergan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080155614 Cooper et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080162667 Verma et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080162821 Duran et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080162843 Davis et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080172488 Jawahar et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080189437 Halley Aug 2008 A1
20080201332 Souders et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215718 Stolorz et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080215730 Sundaram et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080215735 Farber et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080215747 Menon et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080215750 Farber et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080215755 Farber et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222281 Dilley et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222291 Weller et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222295 Robinson et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080228574 Stewart et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080228920 Souders et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080235400 Slocombe et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080256175 Lee et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080275772 Suryanarayana et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281946 Swildens et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281950 Wald et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080288722 Lecoq et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080301670 Gouge et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080319862 Golan et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080320123 Houlihan et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080320269 Houlihan et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090013063 Soman Jan 2009 A1
20090016236 Alcala et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090029644 Sue et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090031367 Sue Jan 2009 A1
20090031368 Ling Jan 2009 A1
20090031376 Riley et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090049098 Pickelsimer et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090063038 Shrivathsan et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090063704 Taylor et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090070533 Elazary et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090083228 Shatz et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090086741 Zhang et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090089869 Varghese Apr 2009 A1
20090103707 McGary et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106381 Kasriel et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090112703 Brown Apr 2009 A1
20090125393 Hwang et al. May 2009 A1
20090125934 Jones et al. May 2009 A1
20090132368 Cotter et al. May 2009 A1
20090132648 Swildens et al. May 2009 A1
20090144412 Ferguson et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090150926 Schlack Jun 2009 A1
20090157850 Gagliardi et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090158163 Stephens et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164331 Bishop et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090177667 Ramos et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090182815 Czechowski et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090182837 Rogers Jul 2009 A1
20090182945 Aviles et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187575 DaCosta Jul 2009 A1
20090204682 Jeyaseelan et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090210549 Hudson et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090233623 Johnson Sep 2009 A1
20090248786 Richardson et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090248787 Sivasubramanian et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090248852 Fuhrmann et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090248858 Sivasubramanian et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090248893 Richardson et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090249222 Schmidt et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090254661 Fullagar et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090259971 Rankine et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090271498 Cable Oct 2009 A1
20090271577 Campana et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090271730 Rose et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090279444 Ravindran et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090282038 Subotin et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090287750 Banavar et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090307307 Igarashi Dec 2009 A1
20090327489 Swildens et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327517 Sivasubramanian et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327914 Adar et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100005175 Swildens et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011061 Hudson et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011126 Hsu et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023601 Lewin et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100030662 Klein Feb 2010 A1
20100030914 Sparks et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100034470 Valencia-Campo et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100036944 Douglis et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100057894 Glasser Mar 2010 A1
20100070603 Moss et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082787 Kommula et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100088367 Brown et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100088405 Huang et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100100629 Raciborski et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100111059 Bappu et al. May 2010 A1
20100115133 Joshi May 2010 A1
20100115342 Shigeta et al. May 2010 A1
20100121953 Friedman et al. May 2010 A1
20100121981 Drako May 2010 A1
20100122069 Gonion May 2010 A1
20100125673 Richardson et al. May 2010 A1
20100125675 Richardson et al. May 2010 A1
20100131646 Drako May 2010 A1
20100138559 Sullivan et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100150155 Napierala Jun 2010 A1
20100161799 Maloo Jun 2010 A1
20100169392 Lev Ran et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100169452 Atluri et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100192225 Ma et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100217801 Leighton et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100223364 Wei Sep 2010 A1
20100226372 Watanabe Sep 2010 A1
20100228819 Wei Sep 2010 A1
20100257024 Holmes et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100257266 Holmes et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100257566 Matila Oct 2010 A1
20100268789 Yoo et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274765 Murphy et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100293296 Hsu et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100293479 Rousso et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100299427 Joshi Nov 2010 A1
20100299438 Zimmerman et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100299439 McCarthy et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100312861 Kolhi et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100318508 Brawer et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100322255 Hao et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100332595 Fullagar et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110029598 Arnold et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040893 Karaoguz et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110078000 Ma et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110078230 Sepulveda Mar 2011 A1
20110087769 Holmes et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110096987 Morales et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110113467 Agarwal et al. May 2011 A1
20110153938 Verzunov et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110153941 Spatscheck et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110191449 Swildens et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110191459 Joshi Aug 2011 A1
20110208876 Richardson et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110219120 Farber et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110219372 Agrawal et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238501 Almeida Sep 2011 A1
20110238793 Bedare et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110252142 Richardson et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110252143 Baumback et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110258049 Ramer et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110276623 Girbal Nov 2011 A1
20110296053 Medved et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110302304 Baumback et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110320559 Foti Dec 2011 A1
20120036238 Sundaram et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120066360 Ghosh Mar 2012 A1
20120089972 Scheidel et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120096065 Suit et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120124184 Sakata et al. May 2012 A1
20120131177 Brandt et al. May 2012 A1
20120136697 Peles et al. May 2012 A1
20120166516 Simmons et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120169646 Berkes et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120173760 Jog et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120179817 Bade et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120179839 Raciborski et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120198043 Hesketh et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120233522 Barton et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120233668 Leafe et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120303804 Sundaram et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120311648 Swildens et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120324089 Joshi Dec 2012 A1
20130003735 Chao et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130019311 Swildens et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130041872 Aizman et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130086001 Bhogal et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130130221 Kortemeyer et al. May 2013 A1
20130151646 Chidambaram et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130198341 Kim Aug 2013 A1
20130212300 Eggleston et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130227165 Liu Aug 2013 A1
20130246567 Green et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130268616 Sakata et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130311605 Richardson et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130318153 Sivasubramanian et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130339429 Richardson et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130346567 Richardson et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140040478 Hsu et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140075109 Richardson et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140143320 Sivasubramanian et al. May 2014 A1
20140257891 Richardson et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140297870 Eggleston et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140325155 Marshall et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140365666 Richardson et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150081842 Richardson et al. Mar 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (26)
Number Date Country
1422468 Jun 2003 CN
1605182 Apr 2005 CN
101189598 May 2008 CN
101460907 Jun 2009 CN
103731481 Apr 2014 CN
1603307 Dec 2005 EP
1351141 Oct 2007 EP
2008167 Dec 2008 EP
2001-0506093 May 2001 JP
2001-249907 Sep 2001 JP
2002-044137 Feb 2002 JP
2003-167810 Jun 2003 JP
2003-167813 Jun 2003 JP
2003-522358 Jul 2003 JP
2003188901 Jul 2003 JP
2004-533738 Nov 2004 JP
2005-537687 Dec 2005 JP
2007-133896 May 2007 JP
2009-071538 Apr 2009 JP
2012-209623 Oct 2012 JP
WO 02069608 Sep 2002 WO
WO 2005071560 Aug 2005 WO
WO 2007007960 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2007126837 Nov 2007 WO
WO 2010002603 Jan 2010 WO
WO 2012044587 Apr 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (117)
Entry
“Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2012,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/652,541; Jan. 3, 2012; 35 pages.
“Final Office Action dated Sep. 5, 2012,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/652,541; Sep. 5, 2012; 40 pages.
“Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 4, 2013,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/652,541; Jan. 4, 2013; 11 pages.
“Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2014,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,970; 20 pages.
“Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2014,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,970; 13 pages.
“Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 5, 2014,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,970; 6 pages.
Hartung et al.; Digital rights management and watermarking of multimedia content for m-commerce applications; Published in: Communications Magazine, IEEE (vol. 38, Issue: 11 ); Date of Publication: Nov. 2000; pp. 78-84; IEEE Xplore.
Mulligan et al.; How DRM-based content delivery systems disrupt expectations of “personal use”; Published in: Proceeding DRM '03 Proceedings of the 3rd ACM workshop on Digital rights management; 2003; pp. 77-89; ACM Digital Library.
Search Report for European Application No. 09839809.2 dated May 11, 2015.
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201180053405.6 dated May 3, 2015.
Canonical Name (CNAME) DNS Records, domainavenue.com, Feb. 1, 2001, XP055153783, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.domainavenue.com/cname.htm [retrieved on Nov. 18, 2014].
“Content delivery network”, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Contentdelivery network&oldid=6010099 70, XP055153445, Mar. 24, 2008.
“Global Server Load Balancing with Serverlron,” Foundry Networks, retrieved Aug. 30, 2007, from http://www.foundrynet.com/pdf/an-global-server-load-bal.pdf, 7 pages.
“Grid Computing Solutions,” Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.sun.com/software/grid, 3 pages.
“Grid Offerings,” Java.net, retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://wiki.java.net/bin/view/Sungrid/OtherGridOfferings, 8 pages.
“Recent Advances Boost System Virtualization,” eWeek.com, retrieved from May 3, 2006, http://www.eWeek.com/article2/0,1895,1772626,00.asp, 5 pages.
“Scaleable Trust of Next Generation Management (STRONGMAN),” retrieved May 17, 2006, from http://www.cis.upenn.edu/˜dsl/Strongman/, 4 pages.
“Sun EDA Compute Ranch,” Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://sun.com/processors/ranch/brochure.pdf, 2 pages.
“Sun Microsystems Accelerates UltraSP ARC Processor Design Program With New Burlington, Mass. Compute Ranch,” Nov. 6, 2002, Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/2002-11/sunflash.20021106.3 .xml, 2 pages.
“Sun N1 Grid Engine 6,” Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.sun.com/software/gridware/index.xml, 3 pages.
“Sun Opens New Processor Design Compute Ranch,” Nov. 30, 2001, Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/2001-11/sunflash.20011130.1.xml, 3 pages.
“The Softricity Desktop,” Softricity, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.softricity.com/products/, 3 pages.
“Xen—The Xen virtual Machine Monitor,” University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory, retrieved Nov. 8, 2005, from http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xeril, 2 pages.
“XenFaq,” retrieved Nov. 8, 2005, from http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenFaq?action=print, 9 pages.
Abi, Issam, et al., “A Business Driven Management Framework for Utility Computing Environments,” Oct. 12, 2004, HP Laboratories Bristol, HPL-2004-171, retrieved Aug. 30, 2007, from http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-171.pdf, 14 pages.
American Bar Association; Digital Signature Guidelines Tutorial [online]; Feb. 10, 2002 [retrieved on Mar. 2, 2010]; American Bar Association Section of Science and Technology Information Security Committee; Retrieved from the internet: (URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20020210124615/www.abanet.org/scitech/ec/isc/dsg-tutorial.html; pp. 1-8.
Baglioni et al., “Preprocessing and Mining Web Log Data for Web Personalization”, LNAI 2829, 2003, pp. 237-249.
Barbir, A., et al., “Known Content Network (CN) Request-Routing Mechanisms”, Request for Comments 3568, [online], IETF, Jul. 2003, [retrieved on Feb. 26, 2013], Retrieved from the Internet: (URL: http://tools.iettorg/rfc/rfc3568.txt).
Bellovin, S., “Distributed Firewalls,” ;login;:37-39, Nov. 1999, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/-smb/papers/distfw. html, 10 pages, retrieved Nov. 11, 2005.
Blaze, M., “Using the KeyNote Trust Management System,” Mar. 1, 2001, from http://www.crypto.com/trustmgt/kn.html, 4 pages, retrieved May 17, 2006.
Brenton, C., “What is Egress Filtering and How Can I Implement It?—Egress Filtering v 0.2,” Feb. 29, 2000, SANS Institute, http://www.sans.org/infosecFAQ/firewall/egress.htm, 6 pages.
Byun et al., “A Dynamic Grid Services Deployment Mechanism for On-Demand Resource Provisioning”, IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid:863-870, 2005.
Chipara et al, “Realtime Power-Aware Routing in Sensor Network”, IEEE, 2006, 10 pages.
Clark, C., “Live Migration of Virtual Machines,” May 2005, NSDI '05: 2nd Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, Boston, MA, May 2-4, 2005, retrieved from http://www.usenix.org/events/nsdi05/tech/full—papers/clark/clark.pdf, 14 pages.
Coulson, D., “Network Security Iptables,” Apr. 2003, Linuxpro, Part 2, retrieved from http://davidcoulson.net/writing/lxf/38/iptables.pdf, 4 pages.
Coulson, D., “Network Security Iptables,” Mar. 2003, Linuxpro, Part 1, retrieved from http://davidcoulson.net/writing/lxf/39/iptables.pdf, 4 pages.
Deleuze, C., et al., A DNS Based Mapping Peering System for Peering CDNs, draft-deleuze-cdnp-dnsmap-peer-00.txt, Nov. 20, 2000, 20 pages.
Demers, A., “Epidemic Algorithms for Replicated Database Maintenance,” 1987, Proceedings of the sixth annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Aug. 10-12, 1987, 12 pages.
Gruener, J., “A Vision of Togetherness,” May 24, 2004, NetworkWorld, retrieved May 3, 2006, from, http://www.networkworld.com/supp/2004/ndc3/0524virt.html, 9 pages.
Gunther et al, “Measuring Round Trip Times to determine the Distance between WLAN Nodes”, Dec. 18, 2004, Technical University Berlin, all pages.
Ioannidis, S., et al., “Implementing a Distributed Firewall,” Nov. 2000, (ACM) Proceedings of the ACM Computer and Communications Security (CCS) 2000, Athens, Greece, pp. 190-199, retrieved from http://www.cis.upenn.edu/˜dls/STRONGMAN/Papers/dt.pdf, 10 pages.
Joseph, Joshy, et al., “Introduction to Grid Computing,” Apr. 16, 2004, retrieved Aug. 30, 2007, from http://www.informit.com/articles/printerfriendly.aspx?p=169508, 19 pages.
Kenshi, P., “Help File Library: Iptables Basics,” Justlinux, retrieved Dec. 1, 2005, from http://www.justlinux.com/nhf/Security/Iptables—Basics.html, 4 pages.
Liu et al., “Combined mining of Web server logs and web contents for classifying user navigation patterns and predicting users' future requests,” Data & Knowledge Engineering 61 (2007) pp. 304-330.
Maesono, et al., “A Local Scheduling Method considering Data Transfer in Data Grid,” Technical Report of IEICE, vol. 104, No. 692, pp. 435-440, The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Japan, Feb. 2005.
Shankland, S., “Sun to buy start-up to bolster N1 ,” Jul. 30, 2003, CNet News.com, retrieved May 3, 2006, http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513—22-5057752.html, 8 pages.
Strand, L., “Adaptive distributed firewall using intrusion detection,” Nov. 1, 2004, University of Oslo Department of Informatics, retrieved Mar. 8, 2006, from http://gnist.org/˜lars/studies/master/StrandLars-master.pdf, 158 pages.
Takizawa, et al., “Scalable MultiReplication Framework on The Grid,” Report of Study of Information Processing Society of Japan, Information Processing Society, vol. 2004, No. 81, pp. 247-252, Japan, Aug. 1, 2004.
Tan et al., “Classification: Basic Concepts, Decision Tree, and Model Evaluation”, Introduction in Data Mining; http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/˜kumar/dmbook/ch4.pdf, 2005, pp. 245-205.
Van Renesse, R., “Astrolabe: A Robust and Scalable Technology for Distributed System Monitoring, Management, and Data Mining,” May 2003, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS), 21 (2): 164-206, 43 pages.
Vijayan, J., “Terraspring Gives Sun's N1 a Boost,” Nov. 25, 2002, Computerworld, retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2002/0,4814, 76159,00.html, 3 pages.
Virtual Iron Software Home, Virtual Iron, retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.virtualiron.com/, 1 page.
Waldspurger, CA., “Spawn: A Distributed Computational Economy,” Feb. 1992, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18(2): 103-117, 15 pages.
Watanabe, et al., “Remote Program Shipping System for GridRPC Systems,” Report of Study of Information Processing Society of Japan, Information Processing Society, vol. 2003, No. 102, pp. 7378, Japan, Oct. 16, 2003.
Xu et al., “Decision tree regression for soft classification of remote sensing data”, Remote Sensing of Environment 97 (2005) pp. 322-336.
Yamagata, et al., “A virtual-machine based fast deployment tool for Grid execution environment, ” Report of Study of Information Processing Society of Japan, Information Processing Society, vol. 2006, No. 20, pp. 127-132, Japan, Feb. 28, 2006.
Zhu, Xiaoyun, et al., “Utility-Driven Workload Management Using Nested Control Design,” Mar. 29, 2006, HP Laboratories Palo Alto, HPL-2005-193(R.1), retrieved Aug. 30, 2007, from http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2005/HPL-2005-193R1.pdf, 9 pages.
First Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006836-9, dated Oct. 12, 2011 in 12 pages.
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006836-9, dated Apr. 30, 2012 in 10 pages.
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111422.3 dated Apr. 13, 2012.
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-502138 dated Feb. 1, 2013.
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006837-7, mailed Oct. 12, 2011 in 11 pages.
Supplementary European Search Report in Application No. 09727694.3 mailed Jan. 30, 2012 in 6 pages.
Singapore Examination Report in Application No. 201006837-7 mailed Mar. 16, 2012.
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111426.1 mailed Feb. 16, 2013.
Second Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111426.1 mailed Dec. 25, 2013.
Third Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111426.1 mailed Jul. 7, 2014.
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-502139 dated Nov. 5, 2013.
Decision of Rejection in Application No. 2011-502139 dated Jun. 30, 2014.
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006874-0, mailed Oct. 12, 2011 in 10 pages.
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-502140 mailed Dec. 7, 2012.
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119995.0 dated Jul. 6, 2012.
Second Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119995.0 dated Apr. 15, 2013.
Examination Report in Singapore Application No. 201006874-0 dated May 16, 2012.
Supplementary European Search Report in Application No. 09728756.9 mailed Jan. 8, 2013.
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119993.1 dated Jul. 4, 2012.
Second Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119993.1 dated Mar. 12, 2013.
Third Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119993.1 dated Oct. 21, 2013.
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-503091 dated Nov. 18, 2013.
Search Report and Written Opinion issued in Singapore Application No. 201006873-2 mailed on Oct. 12, 2011.
First Office Action is Chinese Application No. 200980125551.8 mailed Jul. 4, 2012.
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-516466 mailed Mar. 6, 2013.
Second Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-516466 mailed Mar. 17, 2014.
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2726915 dated May 13, 2013.
First Office Action in Korean Application No. 10-2011-7002461 mailed May 29, 2013.
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980145872.4 dated Nov. 29, 2012.
Preliminary Examination in Chinese Application No. 201310717573.1 dated Feb. 25, 2014. English Translation Not Yet Received.
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2741895 dated Feb. 25, 2013.
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2741895 dated Oct. 21, 2013.
Search Report and Written Opinion in Singapore Application No. 201103333-9 mailed Nov. 19, 2012.
Examination Report in Singapore Application No. 201103333-9 dated Aug. 13, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2011/053302 mailed Nov. 28, 2011 in 11 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2011/053302 mailed Apr. 2, 2013.
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-529454 mailed Feb. 3, 2014 in 6 pages.
First Office Action issued in Australian Application No. 2011307319 mailed Mar. 6, 2014 in 5 pages.
Search Report and Written Opinion in Singapore Application No. 201301573-0 mailed Jul. 1, 2014.
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201180046104.0 mailed Nov. 3, 2014.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2011/061486 mailed May 22, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2011/061486 mailed Mar. 30, 2012 in 11 pages.
Preliminary Examination in Chinese Application No. 201180053405.6 dated May 28, 2013. English Translation Not Yet Received.
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-540982 dated Jun. 2, 2014 English Translation Not Yet Received.
Written Opinion in Singapore Application No. 201303521-7 dated May 20, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US07/07601 mailed Jul. 18, 2008 in 11 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2007/007601 mailed Sep. 30, 2008 in 8 pages.
Supplementary European Search Report in Application No. 07754164.7 mailed Dec. 20, 2010 in 7 pages.
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200780020255.2 dated Mar. 4, 2013.
Office Action in Indian Application No. 3742/KOLNP/2008 dated Nov. 22, 2013.
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2012-052264 mailed Dec. 11, 2012 in 26 pages.
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-123086 mailed Apr. 15, 2014 in 3 pages.
Kalafut et al., Understanding Implications of DNS Zone Provisioning., Proceeding IMC '08 Proceedings of the 8th AMC SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement., pp. 211-216., ACM New York, NY, USA., 2008.
Kato, Yoshinobu , Server load balancer—Difference in distribution technique and supported protocol—Focus on function to meet the needs, Nikkei Communications, Japan, Nikkei Business Publications, Inc., Mar. 20, 2000, vol. 314, pp. 114 to 123 (No English Translation).
Supplementary European Search Report in Application No. 09729072.0 2266064 dated Dec. 10, 2014.
Fourth Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111426.1 mailed Jan. 15, 2015.
Decision of Refusal in Japanese Application No. 2011-516466 mailed Jan. 16, 2015.
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-529454 mailed Mar. 9, 2015 in 8 pages.
Examination Report in Singapore Application No. 201301573-0 mailed Dec. 22, 2014.
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-123086 mailed Dec. 2, 2014 in 2 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150195244 A1 Jul 2015 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12892889 Sep 2010 US
Child 14566615 US