The present invention relates to improvements in form-fill-seal machines, and more particularly to apparatus which are capable of being retrofit onto such machines to improve the machine's productivity through replacement of old-technology heat-sealing elements using a kit comprising an advanced ultrasonic welding stack and anvil.
The packaging of food and other products with a sheet of flexible plastic film through an automated process using a machine is typically achieved by butting and sealing the plastic film to form a pouch. There are numerous examples of such machines, which are referred to within the industry as form-fill-seal machines, and which may be further subdivided into categories as being either horizontal, vertical, or rotary form-fill-seal machines. An example of a horizontal form-fill-seal machine is shown by U.S. Pat. No. 5,826,403 to Haley; an example of a vertical form-fill-seal machine is shown by U.S. Pat. No. 4,117,647 to Rossi; while an example of a rotary form-fill-seal machine is shown by U.S. Pat. No. 6,212,859 to Bielik.
For a substantial period of time, these form-fill-seal machines utilized heat elements, such as the “heated fin wheels” of the Haley device, to seal the package bottom and its side seam to create a pouch, and after filling that pouch with product, a final heat element would seal the top open end of the pouch to form the package. An early marriage of ultrasonic welding principles for sealing of plastic films with a packaging machine is shown by the 1981 U.S. Pat. No. 4,288,965 to James, for a “Form-Fill-Seal Packaging Method and Apparatus.” Ultrasonic welding has since become the preferred method of sealing, because, among other reasons, ultrasonic weld times are less than one second in duration, the process lacks the potential for damage to the packaging material or product from an excessive application of heat, for which traditional heating elements are susceptible, and because the ultrasonic welding process is much better suited to seal through contaminants and product, which the heat sealing process accomplishes poorly, if at all.
Our above-noted co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/925,652 for “Sonotrode and Anvil Energy Director Grids for Narrow/Complex Ultrasonic Welds of Improved Durability,” furthers this divide. The technology disclosed therein makes even more advantageous the use of ultrasonic welding over heating elements, as it reduces the necessary material, by allowing for a narrower weld, while also simultaneously producing welds of improved durability, which is highly desirable particularly for the packaging of liquid, semi-liquid, and even for the packaging of solids or semi solid products. Of course, the process could still be used to produce wider welds, where they may be desired, for example for aesthetic purposes, rather than for being needed to produce a stronger, more durable seal.
However, while that patent-pending technology may easily be incorporated into newly designed form-fill-seal packaging machines, consumers who either recently or long ago purchased machines that seal through the direct application of heat have been at an impasse. The owner's of those machines do not wish or simply cannot afford the expense of a new array of packaging machines, nor can they afford to not produce packaging with the durability that their competitors will soon be utilizing through the use of machines incorporating this new apparatus. The problem has one added dimension of complexity.
The different types of packaging machines may dictate forming the pouch in different stages and at different locations within the machine. In addition, it is common to have at least one or even multiple heat seal stations just for the final top end sealing of multiple product-filled pouches. Therefore, it is highly desirable to incorporate our patent-pending ultrasonic welding technology onto existing machines, but attempts to accomplish such a retro-fit by package machine operators has been unsuccessful, because of the space-constrained volume allocated to the replacement unit. The current invention discloses an adaptable retrofit kit and method for successfully accomplishing retrofitting of the heat station for different kinds of form-fill-seal machines.
It is an object of the invention to provide a means of retrofitting the heat station of a form-fill-seal machine with advanced ultrasonic welding equipment.
It is another object of the invention to provide a means of retrofitting a space-constrained volume of a form-fill-seal or pre-made pouch type machine with a kit comprising advanced ultrasonic welding equipment.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a versatile retrofit kit for replacing a heat station with a kit comprising advanced ultrasonic welding, for either a horizontal or a rotary type of form-fill-seal or pre-made pouch type machine.
It is another object of the invention to provide a retrofit kit for advanced ultrasonic weld sealing of two or more product pouches simultaneously.
Further objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description and claims, and from the accompanying drawings.
Advanced ultrasonic welding components of our co-pending application Ser. No. 12/925,652 are readily incorporated into the design of new form-fill-seal machines, but the owners of older machines, which utilize heat-seal stations, were unsuccessful at devising suitable apparatus and methods for retrofit of the sealing equipment. A retrofit that adeptly replaces the older heat sealing station of either horizontal or rotary form-fill-seal machines, with an advanced ultrasonic sonotrode and anvil of our co-pending application, may comprise the following kit: a housing; a linear rail fixed to the housing; at least first and second bearing carriages being slidable upon the rail; and first and second fluidic muscles. Each of the fluidic muscles may be mounted with a first end being fixed to a respective housing wall, and a second end being fixed to a respective bearing carriage. Attachment to the respective bearing carriage may be through attachment of each muscle to a respective mounting member that may be fixed to respective mounting blocks, which are then fixed to the bearing carriages. The advanced anvil and sonotrode may be secured to respective carriages.
Actuation of each carriage may be through the pressurization of the fluidic muscles, which in turn causes cyclic expansion of the chamber of each muscle, which is accompanied by linear contraction along its length. The contraction of each fluidic muscle causes simultaneous converging translation of the first and second mounting members relative to the linear rail, to cause engagement of a surface of the anvil with a surface of the sonotrode. Synchronizing the electrical power to the stack to correspond to this period of engagement, permits sealing of pouches that are moved along a conveyor or Rotary dial and positioned between the anvil and sonotrode. Depressurization of the fluidic muscles causes reverse translation and disengagement of the anvil from the sonotrode, after which the conveyor or rotary dial may advance to cause exiting of the sealed pouch, and positioning of another unsealed pouch between the anvil/sonotrode combination.
Specially configured in-line arrangements of the anvil/sonotrode, the bearing carriages, the first fluidic muscle, and the second fluidic muscle, serve to provide a very narrow profile, which permits side-by-side kit installations for a retrofit that accomplishes duplex, triplex, or more sealing of pouches on a horizontal machine.
Initial attempts by package machine operators to retrofit existing form-fill-seal machines with the ultrasonic welding technology of our co-pending application Ser. No. 12/925,652, was unsuccessful. The volume that could be occupied by the retrofit apparatus was extremely constrained. This constraint was exacerbated by the scenario where a duplex or triplex sealing operation was required at the heat station. A single large horn and anvil being moved to engage each other using conventional actuators were too slow to achieve satisfactory results or outside the realm of single width ultrasonic horn technology. Using two different pairs of horn/anvil combinations was unsatisfactory because of the difficulty in calibrating synchronous engagement of the pairs while the forces generated were too small, and resort to a servo-motor was considered for synchronization, but found to be overly expensive for the application, as it would diminish its marketability.
The device utilizes a pair of fluidic mechanical muscles in a specially created dual linear mechanism for simultaneous actuation of both the anvil and the horn/booster/converter stack. Today's “Fluidic Muscle,” as it is commonly termed (along with pneumatic artificial muscle), is in part the progeny of an invention by Richard Gaylord. Gaylord, in 1955, received U.S. Pat. No. 2,844,126 for a “Fluid Actuated Motor System and Stroking Device,” In general, a fluidic muscle may be constructed by wrapping a synthetic or natural rubber tube with a woven sheath. This forms an expansible chamber. When a pressurized fluid is applied to the chamber of the fluidic muscle, the chamber expands radially and is accompanied by a corresponding contraction in its length, resulting in linear motion. Metallic or plastic fittings may be secured at both ends to transmit the resultant motion.
The retraction strength of the muscle may be determined by the total strength of the individual fibers forming the woven sheath, while its exertion distance may be determined according to the tightness of the weave, where a looser weave may allow greater bulging, resulting in further twisting of the individual fibers in the weave. Fluidic muscles for use with the current invention may be obtained from the Festo Corporation, located in Mt. Prospect, Ill. (see www.festo.com).
Fluidic muscles are commonly utilized in pairs—one agonist and one antagonist, where the antagonist acts in opposition to the motion of the agonist, thereby mimicking the functioning of muscles within the human body (e.g., an extensor muscle that opens a joint and a flexor muscle to act in opposition to close the joint). However, in this invention, the fluidic muscles operate in a different mode.
In the simplest possible embodiment, a single fluidic muscle may be used to replicate the linear motion provided by the press 190 in a typical prior art ultrasonic welding machine 100, represented in
A first embodiment of the present invention is shown by the retrofit kit 10 in
The base 20 may have a first opening 20A and a second opening 20B, both of which may be slotted openings. A first mounting member 30 may have a portion being disposed part-way through the first opening 20A in base 20. In one embodiment, first mounting member 30 may preferably be “L”-shaped, and may have one leg 31 of the “L” protruding up through the opening 20A in base 20, and the other leg 32 may be disposed so as to generally parallel the base 20 of the housing. The first mounting member 30 may therefore be slidable within the slotted opening 20A of the base 20 of the housing. A second mounting member 40 may be similarly constructed with first and second legs 41 and 42, and be correspondingly disposed so as to be slidable within the second opening 20B in the base. The ends of the second legs 32 and 42 of the “L”-shaped mounting members may face each other within the kit assembly.
The second legs 32 and 42 of the “L”-shaped mounting members 30 and 40 may each be attached to at least one respective bearing carriage, which may be slidable upon a linear rail. In a preferred embodiment, a linear rail with four bearing carriages being slidable thereon may be used. Linear rails and bearing carriages are commercially available, and may be obtained from PBC Linear, in Roscoe, Ill. (see www.pbclinear.com/Pages/Linear-Components, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference). A linear rail 50 may be secured to the bottom of base 20, and may have bearing carriages 51, 52, 53, and 54 being slidable thereon, as seen in
Alternatively, and as may be seen in
An advanced anvil 12, which incorporates the features disclosed in co-pending application Ser. No. 12/925,652, may be secured to the mounting block 61. In a preferred embodiment, an angled gusset assembly 64 may first be secured to the mounting block 61, and then the anvil 12 may be secured to the gusset assembly 64. To accommodate the build-up of tolerances and to generally permit adjustments to the precise static positioning of the anvil, the importance of which is discussed hereinafter, a base plate 65 may be located between the gusset assembly 64 and the anvil 12, and leveling feet may be positioned between the base plate 65 and the anvil 12.
An advanced sonotrode 13, which incorporates features disclosed in co-pending application Ser. No. 12/925,652, may form part of a stack that also includes a booster 14 and a converter 15. The stack may be secured to the mounting block 62 using upper and lower clamp blocks 65U/65L that secure the booster, and upper and lower clamp blocks 66U/66L that secure the converter. The upper clamp blocks 65U and 66U may each be fixedly secured to the mounting block 62, and the lower clamp blocks 65L and 66L may each be releasably secured to the corresponding upper clamp blocks using set screws 67, to releasably secure the stack to the mounting block 62.
One embodiment of the leveling feet, base, and anvil is shown in an exploded view in
With this arrangement of
With the retrofit kit 10 being assembled as described above, and with pneumatic/hydraulic tubes being appropriately installed to port pressure to the fluidic muscles 16 and 17, pressurizing of the first and second fluidic muscles may cause translation of the first muscle mounting member 30 and translation of the second muscle mounting member 40, with the translation being generally simultaneous and being relative to the linear rail, and with it causing convergence of the two mounting member so as to cause engagement of a surface of the anvil 12 with a surface of the sonotrode 13. A controller may be used to sequence porting of pneumatic/hydraulic pressure to the fluidic muscles and corresponding depressurizing, with the pulsing of electric power to the stack to cause the mechanical vibrations that creates friction between the “work piece” materials (the sides of the open end of the pouch) to generate heat to melt the contact area therebetween. Depressurizing of the first and second fluidic muscles 16 and 17 may cause reverse-translation of the first and second muscle mounting members 30 and 40 relative to the linear rail pair 50A/50B to cause disengagement of (or separation between) the engaging surface of the anvil 12 and the engaging surface of said sonotrode 13, after an appropriate weld time has elapsed.
The translation of the two mounting members 30 and 40 need not be simultaneous, but it is important that the engaging surface of the anvil 12 and the engaging surface of the sonotrode 13 meet at a prescribed “mid-plane,” where the pouch is positioned. As seen in
A second embodiment 10A of the retrofit kit of the current invention is shown mounted to a horizontal form-fill-seal machine in
Inline positioning of the same fluidic muscles 18/19 may be accomplished, as seen in
Retrofit of the advanced technology ultrasonic anvil and sonotrode onto existing form-fill-seal machines may require the removal of one or more heat sealing stations and any associated support brackets originally used to secure the heat station to a frame of the machine. The retrofit kit 10 or kit 10A may be supplied for installation thereon. Because of differences in the frame and other features of certain machines produced by various manufacturers, a horizontal machine spacer assembly 80 (
Each of the kits, as well as the horizontal machine spacer assembly 80 or the rotary machine column assembly 90, may require drilling of mounting holes into the frame of the machine that is to be retrofitted. As seen in
The examples and descriptions provided merely illustrate a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Those skilled in the art and having the benefit of the present disclosure will appreciate that further embodiments may be implemented with various changes within the scope of the present invention. Other modifications, substitutions, omissions and changes may be made in the design, size, materials used or proportions, operating conditions, assembly sequence, or arrangement or positioning of elements and members of the preferred embodiment without departing from the spirit of this invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 13/713,237, filed on Dec. 13, 2012, which claims priority on U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/569,916, filed on Dec. 13, 2011, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/925,652, filed Nov. 26, 2010, titled “Sonotrode and Anvil Energy Director Grids for Narrow/Complex Ultrasonic Welds of Improved Durability,” with the disclosures of each being incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2844126 | Gaylord | Jul 1958 | A |
2899875 | Leasure | Aug 1959 | A |
2946119 | Jones et al. | Jul 1960 | A |
3224915 | Balamuth et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
3948705 | Ausnit | Apr 1976 | A |
4029538 | Vance, Jr. | Jun 1977 | A |
4117647 | Rossi | Oct 1978 | A |
4161420 | Clarke et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4288965 | James | Sep 1981 | A |
4373982 | Kreager et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4517790 | Kreager | May 1985 | A |
4532753 | Kovacs | Aug 1985 | A |
4534818 | Kreager et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4537016 | Shanklin et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4666536 | Van Erden et al. | May 1987 | A |
4807420 | Barker | Feb 1989 | A |
4819411 | Konzal et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5244532 | Wadium et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5547284 | Imer | Aug 1996 | A |
5605026 | Schott et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5678390 | Pruett et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5826403 | Haley | Oct 1998 | A |
5843540 | Heydarpour et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6029428 | Terminella et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6066216 | Ruppel, Jr. | May 2000 | A |
6135339 | Parrini | Oct 2000 | A |
6178722 | McMahon | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199848 | Bellandi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212859 | Bielik | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6379483 | Eriksson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6554931 | Blanchard et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554957 | Urlaub | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6562166 | Molander et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6574944 | Capodieci | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6691491 | Terminella et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6748723 | Wadium et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6780263 | Delisle | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790312 | Cosaro et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6835257 | Perrine | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6928794 | Hamer et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6986232 | Kume et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7018493 | Altmeyer et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7082737 | Van Rens et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7234285 | Kinigakis | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7275354 | Frievalt et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7322169 | Kettner et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7571810 | Tilton | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7584670 | Myers | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7681378 | Brormann et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7722254 | Murray | May 2010 | B2 |
7734276 | Harrington | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7793815 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8376016 | Hull | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8591679 | Hull | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8689850 | Hull | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20080000202 | Kettner et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20150107781 | Hull | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 967 161 | Dec 1999 | EP |
2 447 042 | May 2012 | EP |
1 216 743 | Dec 1970 | GB |
H08-24314 | Jan 1996 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150107781 A1 | Apr 2015 | US | |
20170008222 A9 | Jan 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61569916 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13713237 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 14056050 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12925652 | Oct 2010 | US |
Child | 13713237 | US |