In the typical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction via suspensory fixation, a graft tendon is pulled into a passage formed in the femur with sutures and the sutures are anchored in place within the bone using a suspensory button anchoring device. In this process, the anchoring device is also passed through the passage and, once positioned in the desired position, deployed to lock the device in place within the bone.
While the above-described anchoring devices are viable, they have several drawbacks. First, the devices are relatively expensive, which increases the overall cost of the procedure. Second, the devices can be difficult to pass through the femur and deploy in the desired location. Third, the devices can loosen over time, which results in loosening of the graft. Fourth, the devices are permanent in that they cannot be repositioned after they have been deployed.
From the above discussion, it can be appreciated that it would be desirable to have an anchoring device that avoids one or more of the above-described drawbacks.
The present disclosure may be better understood with reference to the following figures. Matching reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the figures, which are not necessarily drawn to scale.
As described above, it would be desirable to have an anchoring device that avoids one or more drawbacks of suspensory button anchoring devices. Disclosed herein are reversible anchoring devices that, for example, can be used to secure a graft tendon in an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction procedure. In some embodiments, the anchoring device includes a base and a cap that are adapted to be threaded together. In use, the base is positioned on the surface of the femur at the opening of a passage that has been formed through the femur. The ends of a suture that is attached to a graft tendon are pulled through the passage from bottom to top and are passed through an opening in the base. The suture is then passed through one or more openings formed in the cap and the cap is securely threaded onto the base to form an anchoring device that compresses the suture and prevents it from moving relative to the device.
In the following disclosure, various specific embodiments are described. It is to be understood that those embodiments are example implementations of the disclosed inventions and that alternative embodiments are possible. All such embodiments are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure.
As illustrated in
Unlike a conventional bolt, the base 10 includes an internal passage 18 that extends through the head 12 and the shaft 14 along a longitudinal direction of the base. As shown most clearly in the cross-sectional view of
As is illustrated
Once the graft tendon 52 has been pulled through the passage 50 in the femur to a desired extent, the ends of the suture 54 can be passed through the internal passage 18 of the base 10 and the base can be positioned on top of the opening of the femur passage 50, for example, using a cannula or other hollow tubular instrument. As shown best in
Each end of the suture 54 can also be passed through the threaded circular opening 36 of the cap 30 and through one of the sutures passages 40 that extend from that opening to the top surface 34 of the cap. The cap 30 can then be delivered to the base 10 also using a cannula or other hollow tubular instrument. The cap 30 can then be threaded onto the base 10 so that the threaded shaft 14 of the base threads into the threaded circular opening 36 of the cap. In some embodiments, this can be performed using a wrench or driver having a star-shaped tip that matches the central opening 42 formed in the top of the cap 30. Once the cap 30 is tightly threaded onto the base 10, the lengths of suture 54 will be securely clamped between the frustoconical member 38 of the cap and the frustoconical portion 22 of the internal passage 18 of the base.
At this point, the opposite end(s) of the graft tendon 52 can be pulled through the tibia with a desired degree of tension and then anchored within or outside of the tibia.
The above-described anchoring device exhibits several advantages over conventional suspensory button anchoring devices. First, because of its simplicity, the disclosed anchoring device is both relatively inexpensive to produce and relatively simple to use. In regard to use, the anchoring device need not be passed through the femur and deployed while within the bone like conventional anchoring devices. Second, unlike current devices, the disclosed anchoring device is less likely to loosen after fixation. Third, the disclosed anchoring device is reversible. Specifically, if it is desired to change the position of the graft tendon after fixation, the cap 30 can be loosened, the graft tendon can be repositioned, and the cap can be retightened.
Referring next to
The cap 70 further includes suture passages 80 that, like the passages 40 of the cap 30, extend through the top surface 74 of the cap to the threaded circular opening 76. In addition, the cap 70 includes a star-shaped central opening 82 that can receive a tool, such as a star-shaped wrench or driver, to enable secure threading of the cap onto the base 60.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/024,668, filed Jul. 15, 2014, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/031974 | 5/21/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/010628 | 1/21/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4537185 | Stednitz | Aug 1985 | A |
4950270 | Bowman | Aug 1990 | A |
5156616 | Meadows | Oct 1992 | A |
5702397 | Goble | Dec 1997 | A |
6994725 | Goble | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7147652 | Bonutti | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7491217 | Hendren | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7833244 | Cerundolo | Nov 2010 | B2 |
9084596 | Stanley | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9402622 | Taylor | Aug 2016 | B2 |
20070073291 | Cordaro | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090292321 | Collette | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20120041496 | Walker | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120065648 | Roorda | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130035720 | Perriello | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130331896 | Holt | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140081323 | Hawkins | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140194907 | Bonutti et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Kamelger, et al., “Suspensory fixation of grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of 3 implants”, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery 25.7 (2009): 767-76. |
European Search Report for Application No. 15821573.1-1122 dated Mar. 26, 2018, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170202659 A1 | Jul 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62024668 | Jul 2014 | US |