BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of an RFID system in which the present invention can be embodied.
FIG. 2A is a pictorial illustration depicting amplitude shift keying modulation.
FIG. 2B is a pictorial illustration depicting phase shift keying modulation.
FIGS. 3A1 and 3A2 are pictorial illustrations of the data-0 and data-1 symbols, respectively, of an FM0 baseband waveform, which may be used for Tag-to-Interrogator signaling in the RFID system of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3B is a pictorial illustration of symbol sequences of an FM0 baseband waveform, which may be used for Tag-to-Interrogator signaling in the RFID system of FIG. 1.
FIG. 4A is a pictorial illustration of the data-0 and data-1 symbols of a Miller-modulated waveform, which may be used for Tag-to-Interrogator signaling in the RFID system of FIG. 1.
FIG. 4B is a pictorial illustration of symbol sequences of a Miller-modulated waveform, which may be used for Tag-to-Interrogator signaling in the RFID system of FIG. 1.
FIG. 5A is a pictorial illustration of a preamble waveform that precedes each Query command as part of Interrogator-to-Tag signaling in the RFID system of FIG. 1.
FIG. 5B is a pictorial illustration of a frame-synch waveform that precedes other commands (e.g., Select, ACK, Read, Write, Kill) as part of Interrogator-to-Tag signaling in the RFID system of FIG. 1.
FIGS. 6A and 6B are pictorial illustrations of two different preamble waveforms that precede one or more reply data fields as part of Tag-to-Interrogator signaling in the RFID system of FIG. 1 in those instances where FM0 Tag-to-Interrogator signaling is employed.
FIG. 6C is a pictorial illustration of an end-of-signaling waveform that terminates FM0 Tag-to-Interrogator signaling.
FIGS. 7A and 7B are pictorial illustrations of two different sets of preamble waveforms that precede one or more reply data fields as part of Tag-to-Interrogator signaling in the RFID system of FIG. 1 in those instances where Miller-modulated Tag-to-Interrogator signaling is employed.
FIG. 7C is a pictorial illustration of an end-of-signaling waveform that terminates Miller-modulated Tag-to-Interrogator signaling.
FIG. 8 is a functional block diagram of a digital implementation of the data recovery circuit of FIG. 1 in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 9A is a pictorial illustration of a composite S0 basis function, which is the composite of the S0—odd basis function of FIG. 9B and the S0—even basis function of FIG. 9C.
FIG. 9B is a pictorial illustration of an S0—odd basis function, which corresponds to the data=0 symbol of the FM0 signal format and which is used for decoding of odd symbols in the data recovery circuit of FIG. 8.
FIG. 9C is a pictorial illustration of an S0—even basis function, which corresponds to the data=0 symbol of the FM0 signal format and which is used for decoding of even symbols in the data recovery circuit of FIG. 8.
FIG. 10A is a pictorial illustration of a composite S1 basis function, which is the composite of the S1—odd basis function of FIGS. 10B and the S1—even basis function of FIG. 10C.
FIG. 10B is a pictorial illustration of an S1—odd basis function, which corresponds to the data=1 symbol of the FM0 signal format and which is used for decoding of odd symbols in the data recovery circuit of FIG. 8.
FIG. 10C is a pictorial illustration of an S1—even basis function, which corresponds to the data=1 symbol of the FM0 signal format and which is used for decoding of even symbols in the data recovery circuit of FIG. 8.
FIGS. 11A to 11E are signal waveforms that describe the signal processing operations carried out by the data recovery circuit of FIG. 8.
FIG. 12 illustrates an analog implementation of the data recovery circuit of FIG. 8 with like numerals designating analog-forms of the signal processing functionality shown therein.
FIG. 13 illustrates an alternate embodiment of the data recovery circuit of FIG. 1 in accordance with the present invention.