Riveting system and process for forming a riveted joint

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6502008
  • Patent Number
    6,502,008
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 3, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 31, 2002
    21 years ago
Abstract
A computer program operably controls a riveting system to join two or more workpieces with a rivet. In another aspect of the present invention, a self-piercing rivet is employed with computer software to sense, measure and/or determine riveting and/or joint characteristics. Still another aspect of the present invention employs an electronic control unit and one or more sensors to determine a riveting characteristic and/or an actuator characteristic.
Description




BACKGROUND




This invention relates generally to riveting and more particularly to a riveting system and a process for forming a riveted joint.




It is well known to join two or more sheets of metal with a rivet. It is also known to use self-piercing rivets that do not require a pre-punched hole. Such self-piercing or punch rivet connections can be made using a solid rivet or a hollow rivet.




A punch rivet connection is conventionally formed with a solid rivet by placing the parts to be joined on a die. The parts to be joined are clamped between a hollow clamp and the die. A plunger punches the rivet through the workpieces such that the rivet punches a hole in the parts thereby rendering pre-punching unnecessary. Once the rivet has penetrated the parts to be joined, the clamp presses the parts against the die, which includes a ferrule. The force of the clamp and the geometry of the die result in plastic deformation of the die-side part to be joined thereby causing the deformed part to partially flow into an annular groove in the punch rivet. This solid rivet is not deformed.




Traditionally, hydraulically operated joining devices are used to form such punch rivet connections. More specifically, the punching plunger is actuated by a hydraulic cylinder unit. The cost of producing such joining devices is relatively high and process controls for achieving high quality punch rivet connections has been found to be problematic. In particular, hydraulically operated joining devices are subject to variations in the force exerted by the plunger owing to changes in viscosity. Such viscosity changes of the hydraulic medium are substantially dependent on temperature. A further drawback of hydraulically operated joining devices is that the hydraulic medium, often oil, has a hydroscopic affect thereby requiring exchange of the hydraulic fluid at predetermined time intervals. Moreover, many hydraulic systems are prone to hydraulic fluid leakage thereby creating a messy work environment in the manufacturing plant.




When forming a punch connection or joint with a hollow rivet, as well as a semi-hollow rivet, the plunger and punch cause the hollow rivet to penetrate the plunger-side part to be joined and partially penetrate into the die-side part to be joined. The die is designed to cause the die-side part and rivet to be deformed into a closing head. An example of such a joined device for forming a punch rivet connection with a hollow rivet is disclosed in DE 44 19 065 A1. Hydraulically operating joining devices are also used for producing a punch rivet connection with a hollow rivet.




Furthermore, rivet feeder units having rotary drums and escapement mechanisms have been traditionally used. Additionally, it is known to use linear slides to couple riveting tools to robots.




It is also known to employ a computer system for monitoring various characteristics of a blind rivet setting system. For example, reference should be made to U.S. Pat. No. 5,661,887 entitled “Blind Rivet Set Verification System and Method” which issued to Byrne et al. on Sep. 2, 1997, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,666,710 entitled “Blind Rivet Setting System and Method for Setting a Blind Rivet Then Verifying the Correctness of the Set” which issued to Weber et al. on Sep. 16, 1997. Both of these U.S. patents are incorporated by reference herein.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with the present invention, a riveting system is operable to join two or more workpieces with a rivet. In another aspect of the present invention, a self-piercing rivet is employed. A further aspect of the present invention uses a self-piercing rivet which does not fully penetrate the die-side workpiece in an acceptable joint. Still another aspect of the present invention employs an electronic control unit and one or more sensors to determine a riveting characteristic and/or an actuator characteristic. In still another aspect of the present invention, an electric motor is used to drive a nut and spindle drive transmission which converts rotary actuator motion to linear rivet setting motion. In yet another aspect of the present invention, multiple rivet feeders can selectively provide differing types of rivets to a single riveting tool. Unique software employed to control the riveting machine is also used in another aspect of the present invention. A method of operating a riveting system is also provided.




The riveting system of the present invention is advantageous over conventional devices in that the present invention employs a very compact and mechanically efficient rotational-to-linear motion drive transmission. Furthermore, the present invention advantageously employs an electric motor to actuate the riveting punch thereby providing higher accuracy, less spilled fluid mess, lower maintenance, less energy, lower noise and less temperature induced variations as compared to traditional hydraulic drive machines. Moreover, the electronic control system and software employed with the present invention riveting system ensure essentially real time quality control and monitoring of the rivet, riveted joint, workpiece characteristics, actuator power consumption and/or actuator power output characteristics, as well as collecting and comparing historical processing trends using the sensed data.




The riveting system and self-piercing hollow rivet employed therewith, advantageously provide a high quality and repeatable riveted joint that is essentially flush with the punch-side workpiece outer surface without completely piercing through the die-side workpiece. The real-time characteristics of the rivet, joint and workpieces are used in an advantageous manner to ensure the desired quality of the final product. Furthermore, the performance characteristics may be easily varied or altered by reprogramming software set points, depending upon the specific joint or workpiece to be worked upon, without requiring mechanical alterations in the machinery. Additional advantages and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a diagrammatic view showing the preferred embodiment of the riveting system of the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a partially diagrammatic, partially elevational view showing the preferred embodiment riveting system;





FIG. 3

is a perspective view showing a riveting tool of the preferred embodiment riveting system;





FIG. 4

is an exploded perspective view showing the nut and spindle mechanism, punch assembly, and clamp of the preferred embodiment riveting system;





FIG. 5

is an exploded perspective view showing the gear reduction unit employed in the preferred embodiment riveting system;





FIG. 6

is a cross sectional view, taken along line


6





6


of

FIG. 3

, showing the riveting tool of the preferred embodiment riveting system;





FIG. 7

is an exploded perspective view showing a receiving head of the preferred embodiment riveting system;





FIG. 8

is a cross sectional view showing the receiving head of the preferred embodiment riveting system;





FIG. 9

is a cross sectional view, similar to

FIG. 6

, showing a first alternate embodiment of the riveting system;





FIG. 10

is a partially fragmented perspective view showing a rivet feed tube of the preferred embodiment riveting system;





FIG. 11

is an exploded perspective view showing a feeder of the preferred embodiment riveting system;





FIGS. 12



a


-


12




f


are a series of cross sectional views, similar to that of

FIG. 6

, showing the self-piercing riveting sequence of the preferred embodiment riveting system;





FIGS. 13



a


-


13




e


are a series of diagrammatic and enlarged views, similar to those of

FIG. 12

, showing the self-piercing riveting sequence of the preferred embodiment riveting system;





FIGS. 14 and 15

are diagrammatic views showing the control system of the preferred embodiment riveting system;





FIGS. 16 and 17

are graphs showing force versus distance riveting characteristics of the preferred embodiment riveting system;





FIGS. 18



a


-


18




d


are software flow charts of the preferred embodiment riveting system; and





FIG. 19

is a partially diagrammatic, partially side elevational view showing a second alternate embodiment riveting system.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Referring to

FIGS. 1 and 2

, a joining device for punch rivets, hereinafter known as a riveting system


21


, includes a riveting machine or tool


23


, a main electronic control unit


25


, a rivet feeder


27


, and the associated robotic tool movement mechanism and controls, if employed. Riveting tool


23


further has an electric motor actuator


29


, a transmission unit, a plunger


31


, a clamp


33


and a die or anvil


35


. Die


35


is preferably attached to a C-shaped frame


37


or the like. Frame


37


also couples the advancing portion of riveting tool


23


to a set of linear slides


39


which are, in turn, coupled to an articulated robot mounted to a factory floor. A linear slide control unit


41


and an electronic robot control unit


43


are electrically connected to linear slides


39


and main electronic control unit


25


, respectively. The slides


39


are actuated by a pneumatic or hydraulic pressure source


45


.




The transmission unit of riveting tool


23


includes a reduction gear unit


51


and a spindle drive mechanism


53


. Plunger


31


, also known as a punch assembly, includes a punch holder and punch, as will be described in further detail hereinafter. A data monitoring unit


61


may be part of the main controller


25


, as shown in

FIG. 2

, or can be a separate microprocessing unit, as shown in

FIG. 1

, to assist in monitoring signals from the various sensors.




Reference is now made to

FIGS. 3

,


5


and


6


. A main electrical connector


71


is electrically connected to main electronic control unit


25


, which contains a microprocessor, a display screen, indicator lights, and input buttons. Connector


71


is also electrically connected to the other proximity switch sensors located in riveting tool


23


. Electric motor


29


is of a brushless, three phase alternating current type. Energization of electric motor


29


serves to rotate an armature shaft, which in turn, rotates an output gear


73


. Electric motor


29


and gear


73


are disposed within one or more cylindrical outer casings.




Reduction gear unit


51


includes gear housings


75


and


77


within which are disposed two different diameter spur gears


79


and


81


. Various other ball bearings


83


and washers are located within housings


75


and


77


. Additionally, removable plates


85


are bolted onto housing


75


to allow for lubrication. Spur gear


79


is coaxially aligned and driven by output gear


73


, thus causing rotation of spur gear


81


. Adapters


87


and


89


are also stationarily mounted to housing


77


.





FIGS. 4 and 6

show a nut housing


101


directly connected to a central shaft of spur gear


81


. Therefore, rotation of spur gear


81


causes a concurrent rotation of nut housing


101


. Nut housing


101


is configured with a hollow and generally cylindrical proximal segment and a generally enlarged, cylindrical distal segment. A load cell


103


is concentrically positioned around proximal segment of nut housing


101


. Load cell


103


is electrically connected to a load cell interface


105


(see

FIG. 3

) which, in turn, is electrically connected to monitoring unit


61


(see FIG.


1


). Sensor interface


105


is an interactive current amplifier. Load cell


103


is preferably a DMS load cell having a direct current bridge wherein the mechanical input force causes a change in resistance which generates a signal. Alternately, the load cell may be of a piezo-electric type.




A rotatable nut


111


, also known as a ball, is directly received and coupled with a distal segment of nut housing


101


such that rotation of nut housing


101


causes a simultaneously corresponding rotation of nut


111


. Ball bearings


113


are disposed around nut housing


101


. A spindle


115


has a set of external threads which are enmeshed with a set of internal threads of nut


111


. Hence, rotation of nut


111


causes linear advancing and retracting movement of spindle


115


along a longitudinal axis. A proximal end of a rod-like punch holder


121


is bolted to an end of spindle


115


for corresponding linear translation along the longitudinal axis. A rod-like punch


123


is longitudinally and coaxially fastened to a distal end of punch holder


121


for simultaneous movement therewith.




An outwardly flanged section


125


of punch holder


121


abuts against a spring cup


127


. This causes compression of a relatively soft compression spring


128


(approximately 100-300 newtons of biasing force), which serves to drive a rivet out of the receiver and into an initial loaded position for engagement by a distal end of punch


123


. A stronger compression spring


141


(approximately 8,000-15,000 newtons of biasing force) is subsequently compressed by the advancing movement of punch holder


121


. The biasing action of strong compression spring


141


serves to later return and retract a clamp assembly, including a clamp


143


and nose piece, back toward gear reduction unit


51


and away from the workpieces.




A main housing


145


has a proximal hollow and cylindrical segment for receiving the nut and spindle assembly. Main housing


145


further has a pair of longitudinally elongated slots


147


. A sleeve


149


is firmly secured to punch holder


121


and has transversely extending sets of rollers


151


or other such structures bolted thereto. Rollers


151


ride within slots


147


of main housing


145


. Longitudinally elongated slots


153


of clamp


143


engage bushings


155


also bolted to sleeve


149


. Thus, rollers


151


and slots


147


of main housing


145


serves to maintain the desired linear alignment of both punch holder


121


and clamp


143


, as well as predominantly prevent rotation of these members. Additional external covers


157


are also provided. All of the moving parts are preferably made from steel.




Referring to

FIGS. 6 and 15

, a spindle position proximity switch sensor


201


is mounted within riveting tool


23


. A spring biased upper die and self-locking nut assembly


203


serves to actuate spindle position proximity switch


201


upon the spindle assembly reaching the fully retracted, home position. A plate thickness proximity switch sensor


205


is also mounted within riveting tool


23


. An upper die type thickness measurement actuator and self-locking nut assembly


207


indicate the positioning of clamp


143


and thereby serve to actuate proximity sensor


205


. Additional proximity switch sensors


281


and


283


are located in a feed tube for indicating the presence of a rivet therein in a position acceptable for subsequent insertion into the receiver of riveting tool


23


. These proximity switches


201


,


205


,


281


and


283


are all electrically connected to main electronic control unit


25


via module


601


. Furthermore, a resolver-type sensor


211


is connected to electric motor


29


or a member rotated therewith. Resolver


211


serves to sense actuator torque, actuator speed and/or transmission torque. The signal is then sent by the resolver to main electronic control unit


25


. An additional sensor (not shown) connected to electric motor


29


is operable to sense and indicate power consumption or other electrical characteristics of the motor which indicate the performance characteristics of the motor; such a sensed reading is then sent to main electronic control unit


25


.





FIGS. 7 and 8

best illustrate a receiver


241


attached to a distal end or head of riveting tool


23


adjacent punch


123


. An upper housing


243


is affixed to a lower housing


245


by way of a pair of quick disconnect fasteners


247


. A nose piece portion


249


of the clamp assembly is screwed into lower housing


245


and serves to retain a slotted feed channel


251


, compressibly held by elastomeric O-ring


253


. A pair of flexible fingers


255


pivot relative to housings


243


and


245


, and act to temporarily locate a rivet


261


in a desired position aligned with punch


123


prior to insertion into the workpieces. Compression springs


262


serve to inwardly bias flexible fingers


255


toward the advancing axis of punch


123


. Furthermore, a catch stop


263


is mounted to upper housing


243


by a pivot pin. Catch stop


263


is downwardly biased from upper housing


243


by way of a compression spring


265


. A suitable receiver is disclosed in EPO patent publication No. 09 22 538 A2 (which corresponds to German Application No. 297 19 744.4).





FIG. 10

illustrates a feed tube


271


having end connectors


273


and


275


. End connector


273


is secured to receiver


241


(see

FIG. 8

) and connector end


275


is secured to feeder


27


(see FIG.


2


). Feed tube


271


further includes a cylindrical outer protective tube


277


and an inner rivet carrying tube


279


. Inner tube


279


has a T-shaped inside profile corresponding to an outside shape of the rivet fed therethrough. Feed tube


271


is semi-flexible. Entry and exit proximity switch sensors


281


and


283


, respectively, monitor the passage of each rivet through feed tube


271


and send the appropriate indicating signal to main electronic control unit


25


(see FIGS.


2


and


15


). The rivets are pneumatically supplied from feeder


27


to receiver


241


through feed tube


271


.





FIG. 11

shows the internal construction of SRF feeder


27


. The feeder has a stamped metal casing


301


, upper cover


303


and face plate


305


. Feeder


27


is intended to be stationarily mounted to the factory floor. A storage bunker


307


is attached to an internal surface of face plate


305


and serves to retain the rivets prior to feeding. A rotary bowl or drum


309


is externally mounted to face plate


305


. It is rotated by way of a rotary drive unit


311


and the associated shafts. A pneumatic cylinder


313


actuates drive unit


311


and is controlled by a set of pneumatic valves


315


internally disposed within casing


301


. An electrical connector


317


and the associated wire electrically connects feeder


27


to main electronic control unit


25


by way of module


601


(see FIGS.


2


,


14


and


15


).




A pneumatically driven, sliding escapement mechanism


319


is mounted to face plate


305


and is accessible to drum


309


. A proximity switch sensor


321


is mounted to escapement mechanism


319


for indicating passage of each rivet from escapement mechanism


319


. Proximity switch


321


sends the appropriate signal to the main electronic control unit through module


601


. Rotation of drum


309


causes rivets to pass through a slotted raceway


323


for feeding into escapement


319


which aligns the rivets and sends them into feed tube


271


(see FIG.


10


).





FIG. 9

shows a first alternate embodiment riveting system. The joining device or riveting tool has an electric motor operated drive unit


401


. Drive unit


401


is connected to a transmission unit


402


which is arranged in an upper end region of a housing


425


. Housing


425


is connected to a framework


424


.




A drive shaft


411


of drive unit


401


is connected to a belt wheel


412


of transmission unit


402


. Belt wheel


412


drives a belt wheel


414


via an endless belt


413


which may be a flexible toothed belt. The diameter of belt wheel


412


is substantially smaller than the diameter of belt wheel


414


, allowing a reduction in the speed of drive shaft


411


. Belt wheel


414


is rotatably connected to a drive bush


415


. A gear with gear wheels can also be used instead of a transmission unit


402


with belt drive. Other alternatives are also possible.




A rod


417




a


is transversely displaceable within the drive bush


415


which is appropriately mounted. The translation movement of rod


417




a


is achieved via a spindle drive


403


having a spindle nut


416


which cooperates with rod


417




a


. At the end region of rod


417




a


, remote from transmission unit


402


, there is formed a guide member


418


into which rod


417




a


can be introduced. A rod


417




b


adjoins rod


417




a


. An insert


423


is provided in the transition region between rod


417




a


and rod


417




b


. Insert


423


has pins


420


which project substantially perpendicularly to the axial direction of rod


417




a


or


417




b


and engage in slots


419


in guide member


418


. This ensures that rod


417




a


and


417




b


does not rotate. Rod


417




b


is connected to a plunger


404


. Plunger


404


is releasably arranged on rod


417




b


so that it can be formed according to the rivets used. A stop member


422


is provided at the front end region of rod


417




b


. Spring elements


421


are arranged between stop member


422


and insert


423


. Spring elements


421


are spring washers arranged in a tubular portion of guide member


418


. Guide member


418


is arranged so as to slide in a housing


425


. The joining device is shown in a position in which plunger


404


and clamp


405


rest on the parts to be joined


407


and


408


, which also rest on a die


406


.




In a punch rivet connection formed by a grooved solid rivet, the rivet is pressed through the parts to be joined


407


and


408


by plunger


404


once the workpieces have been fixed between die


406


and hold down device/clamp


405


. Clamp


405


and plunger


404


effect clinching. The rivet then punches a hole in the parts to be joined, after which, clamp


405


presses against these parts to be joined. The clamp presses against the die such that the die-side part to be joined


408


flows into the groove of the rivet owing to a corresponding design of die


406


. The variation of the force as a function of the displacement can be determined by the process according to the invention from the power consumption of the electric motor drive


401


. For example, during the cutting process, plunger


404


and, therefore also the rivet, covers a relatively great displacement wherein the force exerted by plunger


404


on the rivet is relatively constant. Once the rivet has cut through the plunger side part to be joined


407


, the rivet is spread into die


406


as the force of plunger


404


increases. The die side part to be joined


408


is deformed by die


406


during this procedure. If the force exerted on the rivet by plunger


404


is sustained, the rivet is compressed. If the head of the punch rivet lies in a plane of the plunger-side part to be joined


407


, the punch rivet connection is produced. The force/displacement curve can be determined from the process data. With a known force/displacement curve which serves as a reference, the quality of a punch connection can be determined by means of the measured level of the force as a function of the displacement.




The drive unit, monitoring unit and the spindle drive can have corresponding sensors for picking up specific characteristics, the output signals of which are processed in the monitoring unit. The monitoring unit can be part of the control unit. The monitoring unit emits input signals as open and closed loop control variables to the control unit. The sensors can be displacement and force transducers which determine the displacement of the plunger as well as the force of the plunger on the parts to be joined. A sensor which measures the power consumption of the electric motor action drive unit can also be provided, as power consumption is substantially proportional to the force of the plunger and optionally of the clamp on the parts to be joined.




In this alternate embodiment, the speed of the drive unit can also be variable. Owing to this feature, the speed with which the plunger or the clamp acts on the parts to be joined or the rivet can be varied. The speed of the drive unit can be adjusted as a function of the properties of the rivet and/or the properties of the parts to be joined. The advantage of the adjustable speed of the drive unit also resides in the fact that, for example, the plunger and optionally the clamp is initially moved at high speed to rest on the parts to be joined and the plunger and optionally the clamp is then moved at a lower speed. This has the advantage of allowing relatively fast positioning of the plunger and the clamp. This also affects the cycle times of the joining device.




It is further proposed that the plunger and optionally the clamp be movable from a predeterminable rest position that can be easily changed through the computer software. The rest position of the plunger and optionally of the clamp is selected as a function of the design of the parts to be joined. If the parts to be joined are smooth metal plates, the distance between a riveting unit which comprises the plunger and the clamp and a die can be slightly greater than the thickness of the superimposed parts to be joined. If a part to be joined has a ridge, as viewed in the feed direction of the part to be joined, the rest position of the riveting unit is selected such that the ridge can be guided between the riveting unit and the die. Therefore, it is not necessary for the riveting unit always to be moved into its maximum possible end or home position.




A force or a characteristic corresponding to the force of the plunger, and optionally of the clamp, can be measured in this alternate embodiment during a joining procedure as a function of the displacement of the plunger or of the plunger and the clamp. This produces a measured level. This is compared with a desired level. If comparison shows that the measured level deviates from the desired level by a predetermined limit value in at least one predetermined range, a signal is triggered. This process control advantageously permits qualitative monitoring of the formation of a punch connection.




This embodiment of the process also compares the measured level with the desired level at least in a region in which clinching is substantially completed by the force of the plunger on a rivet. A statement as to whether a rivet has been supplied and the rivet has also been correctly supplied can be obtained by comparing the actual force/displacement trend with the desired level. The term ‘correctly supplied’ means a supply where the rivet rests in the correct position on the part to be joined. It can also be determined from the result of the comparison whether an automatic supply of rivets is being provided correctly.




The measured level is also compared with the desired level at least in a region in which the parts to be joined have been substantially punched by the force of the plunger on a rivet, in particular a solid rivet, and the clamp exerts a force on the plunger-side part to be joined. This has the advantage that it is possible to check whether the rivet actually penetrated the parts to be joined.




According to this embodiment of the process, the measured level is compared with the desired level, at least in a region in which a rivet, in particular a hollow rivet, substantially penetrated the plunger-side part to be joined owing to the force of the plunger and a closing head was formed on the rivet. It is thus also possible to check whether the parts to be joined also have a predetermined thickness. A comparison between the measured level and the desired level is performed, at least in a region in which a closing head is substantially formed on the rivet, in particular a hollow rivet, and clinching of the rivet takes place. It is thus possible to check whether the rivet ends flush with the surface of the plunger-side part to be joined.




Returning to the preferred embodiment,

FIGS. 12



a


-


12




f


and

FIGS. 13



a


-


13




e


show the riveting process steps employing the system of the present invention. The preferred rivet employed is of a self-piercing and hollow type which does not fully pierce through the die-side workpiece. First,

FIGS. 12



a


and


13




a


show the clamp/nose piece


249


and punch


123


in retracted positions relative to workpieces


501


and


503


. Workpieces


501


and


503


are preferably stamped sheet metal body panels of an automotive vehicle, such as will be found on a conventional pinch weld flange adjacent the door and window openings. The robot and linear slides will position the riveting tool adjacent the sheet metal flanges such that nose piece


249


and die


35


sandwich workpieces


501


and


503


therebetween at a target joint location. It is alternately envisioned that a manually (non-robotic) moved riveting tool or a stationary riveting tool can also be used with the present invention.





FIG. 12



b


shows clamp/nose piece


249


clamping and compressing workpieces


501


and


503


against die


35


. Punch


123


has not yet begun to advance rivet


261


toward workpieces


501


and


503


. At this point, the plate thickness proximity switch senses the thickness of the workpieces through actual location of the clamp assembly; the plate thickness switch sends the appropriate signal to the main controller. Next, punch


123


advances rivet


261


to a point approximately 1 millimeter above the punch-side workpiece


501


. This is shown in

FIGS. 12



c


and


13




b


. If the workpiece thickness dimension is determined to be within an acceptable range by the main electronic control unit then energization of the electric motor further advances punch


123


to insert rivet


261


into punch-side workpiece


501


, as shown in

FIG. 13



c


, and then continuously advances the rivet into die-side workpiece


503


, as shown in

FIGS. 12



d


and


13




d


. Die


35


serves to outwardly deform and diverge the distal end of rivet


261


opposite punch


123


.





FIG. 12



e


shows the punch subsequently retracted to an intermediate position less than the full home position while clamp/nose piece


249


continues to engage punch side workpiece


501


. Finally, punch


123


and clamp/nose piece


249


are fully retracted back to their home positions away from workpieces


501


and


503


. This allows workpieces


501


and


503


to be separated and removed from die


35


if an acceptable riveted joint is determined by the main electronic control unit based on sensed joint characteristics. As shown in

FIG. 13



e


, an acceptable riveted joint has an external head surface of rivet


261


positioned flush and co-planar with an exterior surface of punch-side workpiece


501


. Also, in an acceptable joint, the diverging distal end of rivet


261


has been sufficiently expanded to engage workpiece


503


without piercing completely through the exterior surface of die-side workpiece


503


.




A simplified electrical diagram of the preferred embodiment riveting system is shown in FIG.


14


. Main electronic control unit


25


, such as a high speed industrial microprocessor computer, having a cycle time of about 0.02 milliseconds purchased from Siemons Co., has been found to be satisfactory. A separate microprocessor controller


61


is connected to main electronic control unit


25


by way of an analogic input/output line and an Encoder


2


input which measures the position of the spindle through a digital signal. Controller


61


receives an electric motor signal and a resolver signal. The load cell force signal is sent directly from the tool connection


105


to the main electronic control unit


25


while the proximity switch signals (from the feeder, feed tube and spindle home position sensors) are sent from the tool connection


71


through an input/output delivery microprocessor module


601


and then to main electronic control unit


25


. Input/output delivery microprocessor module


601


actuates error message indication lamps


603


, receives a riveting start signal from an operator activatable switch


605


and relays control signals to feeder


27


from main electronic control unit


25


. An IBS/CAN gateway transmits data from main electronic control unit


25


to a host system which displays and records trends in data such as joint quality, workpiece thickness and the like. Controller


61


is also connected to a main power supply via fuse


607


.





FIG. 16

is a force/distance (displacement) graph showing a sequence of a single riveting operation or cycle. The first spiral spring distance range is indicative of the force and displacement of punch


123


due to light spring


128


. The next displacement range entitled hold down spring, is indicative of the force and displacement generated by heavy spring


141


, clamp


143


and the associated clamping nose piece


249


. Measurement of the sheet metal/workpiece thickness occurs at a predetermined point within this range, such as 24 millimeters from the home position, by way of load cell


103


interacting with main electronic control unit


25


. In the next rivet length range, the rivet length is sensed and determined through load cell


103


and main electronic control unit


25


. The middle line shown is the actual rivet signature sensed while the upper line shown is the maximum tolerance band and the lower line shown is the minimum tolerance band of an acceptable rivet length for use in the joining operation. If an out of tolerance rivet is received and indicated then the software will discontinue or “break off” the riveting process and send the appropriate error message.





FIG. 17

shows a force versus distance/displacement graph for the rivet setting point. The sensed workpiece thickness, the middle line, is compared to a prestored maximum and minimum thickness acceptability lines within the main electronic control unit


25


. This occurs at a predetermined distance of movement by the clamp assembly from the home position or other initialized position. The rivet length (or other size or material type) signature is also indicated and measured. Load cell


103


senses force of the clamp assembly and punch assembly. The workpiece thickness is determined by comparison of a first sensed force value at a preset displacement versus a preprogrammed force value at that location. Subsequently sensed force values are also compared to preset acceptable values; these subsequent sensed force values are indicative of rivet size and joint quality characteristics. The computer is always on-line with the tool and process in a closed-loop manner. This achieves a millisecond, real time control of the process through sensed values.





FIGS. 18



a


-


18




d


show a flow chart of the computer software used in the main electronic control unit


25


for the preferred embodiment riveting system of the present invention. The beginning of the riveting cycle is started through an operator actuated switch, whereafter the system waits for the spindle to return to a home position. From a prestored memory location, a rivet joint number is read in order to determine the prestored characteristics for that specific joint in the automotive vehicle or other workpiece (e.g., joint number 16 out of 25 total). Thus, the workpiece thickness, rivet length, rivet quality and force versus distance curves are recalled for comparison purposes for the joint to be riveted.




Next, the software determines if a rivet is present in the head based upon a proximity switch signal. If not, the feeder is energized to cause a rivet to be fed into the head. The spindle is then moved and the workpiece is clamped. The plate or workpiece thickness is then determined based on the load cell signals and compared against the recalled memory information setting forth the acceptable range. If the plate thickness is determined to be out of tolerance, then the riveting process is broken off or stopped. If the plate thickness is acceptable for that specific joint, then the rivet length is determined based on input signals from the load cell. If the punch force is too large, too soon in the stroke, then the rivet length is larger than an acceptable size, and vice versa for a small rivet. The riveting process is discontinued if the rivet length is out of tolerance.




The spindle is then retracted after the joint is completed. After the spindle is opened or retracted to the programmed home position, which may be different than the true and final home position, indicator signals are activated to indicate if the riveted joint setting is acceptable (OK), if the riveting cycle is complete (RC), and is ready for the next rivet setting cycle (reset OK). It should also be appreciated that various resolver signals and motor power consumption signals can also be used by second microprocessor


61


to indicate other quality characteristics of the joint although they are not shown in these flow diagrams. However such sensor readings would be compared against prestored memory values to determine whether to continue the riveting process, or discontinue the riveting process and send an error signal. Motor sensor readings can also be used to store and display cycle-to-cycle trends in data to an output device such as a CRT screen or printout.





FIG. 18



d


shows a separate software subroutine of error messages if the riveting process is broken off or discontinued. For example, if the plate thickness is unacceptable, then an error message will be sent stating that the setting is not okay (NOK) with a specific error code. Similarly, if the rivet length was not acceptable then a not okay setting signal will be sent with a specific error code. If another type of riveting fault has been determined then another rivet setting not okay signal will be sent and a unique error code will be displayed.




Another alternate embodiment riveting system is illustrated in

FIG. 19. A

robotically controlled riveting tool


801


is essentially the same as that disclosed with the preferred embodiment. However, two separate rivet feeders


803


and


805


are employed. Rivet feeders


803


and


805


are of the same general construction as that disclosed with the preferred embodiment, however, the rivet length employed in the second feeder


805


is longer (such as 5 millimeters in total length) than that in the first feeder


803


(such as a total rivet length of 3 millimeters). Each feeder


803


and


805


transmits the specific length rivets to a selector junction device


807


by way of separate input feed tubes


809


and


811


. Selector device


807


has a pneumatically actuated reciprocating slide mechanism which is electrically controlled by a main electronic control unit


813


. When main electronic control unit


813


recalls the specific joint to be worked on, it then sends a signal to selector device


807


as to which rivet length is needed. Selector device


807


subsequently mechanically feeds the correct rivet through a single exit feed tube


815


which is connected to a receiver


817


of riveting tool


801


.




Thus, a single riveting tool can be used to rivet multiple joints having rivets of differing selected sizes or material characteristics without the need for complicated mechanical variations or multiple riveting tool set ups. The software program within main electronic control unit


813


can easily cause differing rivets to be sent to the single riveting tool


801


, while changes can be easily made simply by reprogramming of the main electronic control unit. This saves space on the crowded assembly plant line, reduces mechanical complexity and reduces potential failure modes.




The accuracy of riveting, as well as measurements in the preferred embodiment, are insured by use of the highly accurate electric servo motor and rotary-to-linear drive mechanism employed. For example, the rivet can be inserted into the workpieces with one tenth of a millimeter of accuracy. The control system of the present invention also provides a real time quality indication of the joint characteristics, rather than the traditional random sampling conducted after many hundreds of parts were improperly processed. Thus, the present invention achieves higher quality, greater consistency and lower cost riveted joints as compared to conventional constructions.




While various embodiments have been disclosed, it will be appreciated that other configurations may be employed within the spirit of the present invention. For example, the spindle and punch holder may be integrated into a single part. Similarly, the nose piece and clamp can be incorporated into a single or additional parts. Belleville springs may be readily substituted for compression springs. Additional numbers of reduction gears or planetary gear types can also be used if a gear reduction ratio is other than that disclosed herein; however, the gear types disclosed with the preferred embodiment of the present invention are considered to be most efficiently packaged relative to many other possible gear combinations. A variety of other sensors and sensor locations may be employed beyond those specifically disclosed as long as the disclosed functions are achieved. Additionally, analog or other digital types of electronic control systems, beyond microprocessors, can also be used with the riveting tool of the present invention. The electronic control units of the monitor and delivery module can be part of or separate from the main electronic control unit. It is also envisioned that more than two workpiece sheets can be joined by the present invention, and that the workpieces may be part of a microwave oven, refrigerator, industrial container or the like. While various materials and dimensions have been disclosed, it will be appreciated that other materials and dimensions may be readily employed. It is intended by the following claims to cover these and any other departures from the disclosed embodiments which fall within the true spirit of this invention.



Claims
  • 1. A computer program recorded on a medium for use in a workpiece riveting process, the program being operated according to the steps comprising:(a) recalling data about a joint to be riveted; (b) determining if a rivet is located in a riveting tool; (c) sending a signal to feed a rivet to the riveting tool if step (b) is negative; (d) energizing an actuator of the riveting tool to advance the rivet; (e) measuring workpiece thickness; (f) determining if the workpiece thickness is acceptable, and if not, stopping the riveting process; (g) determining a rivet size characteristic, and if unacceptable, stopping the riveting process; and (h) determining the force used to join the workpieces by the rivet, and if unacceptable, stopping the riveting process.
  • 2. The program of claim 1 further comprising sending an error signal if an unacceptable condition is determined.
  • 3. The program of claim 1 further comprising storing determined values and displaying historical trends between riveting process cycles.
  • 4. The program of claim 1 further comprising determining which rivet should be fed to the riveting tool from multiple different rivet options.
  • 5. The program of claim 1 wherein the actuator is an electric motor, further comprising causing rotation of a portion of the electric motor which linearly drives a rivet punch.
  • 6. Computer software stored on a medium for use in a workpiece riveting process having a rivet and a riveting tool with an electric motor, the software being operated according to the steps comprising:(a) energizing the electric motor of the riveting tool and advancing the rivet; (b) determining thickness of a workpiece; (c) determining if the workpiece thickness is acceptable, and if not, altering the riveting process; (d) determining a rivet characteristic, and if unacceptable, stopping the riveting process; and (e) determining the force needed to join workpieces by the rivet, and if unacceptable, stopping the riveting process.
  • 7. The software of claim 6 further comprising sending an error signal if an unacceptable condition is determined.
  • 8. The software of claim 6 further comprising storing determined values and displaying historical trends between riveting process cycles.
  • 9. The software of claim 6 further comprising determining which rivet should be fed to the riveting tool from multiple different rivet options.
  • 10. The software of claim 6 wherein the rivet characteristic is rivet size.
  • 11. The software of claim 6 further comprising causing rotation of a portion of the electric motor which linearly drives a rivet punch.
  • 12. Computer software stored on a medium for use in a workpiece riveting process having workpieces, a rivet, a riveting tool, a rivet feeder and an electronic control unit, the software being operated according to the steps comprising:(a) determining if the rivet is located in the riveting tool; (b) sending a signal to feed the rivet to the riveting tool if step (a) is negative; (c) energizing an actuator of the riveting tool to advance the rivet; (d) measuring the thickness of at least one of the workpieces; (e) determining if the thickness is acceptable; (f) determining a size characteristic of the rivet; and (g) determining the force used to join the workpieces by the rivet.
  • 13. The software of claim 12 wherein the actuator is an electric motor, further comprising deenergizing the electric motor if an unacceptable condition is determined.
  • 14. The software of claim 12 further comprising sending an error signal if an unacceptable condition is determined.
  • 15. The software of claim 12 further comprising storing determined values and displaying historical trends between riveting process cycles.
  • 16. The software of claim 12 further comprising determining which rivet should be fed to the riveting tool from multiple different rivet options.
  • 17. The software of claim 12 further comprising causing rotation of the actuator which linearly drives the rivet into the workpieces in a self-piercing manner.
  • 18. A computer program stored on a medium for use in a riveting process employing a self-piercing rivet, a joint, and a riveting tool having an electric motor, a transmission, a punch and a die, the program being operated according to the steps comprising:(a) recalling data about the joint to be riveted; (b) energizing the electric motor and converting rotary motion of the motor to linear motion in the transmission operably driven by the motor; (c) linearly advancing the self-piercing rivet in response to step (b); (d) determining a riveted characteristic of at least one of: (i) the self-piercing rivet and (ii) the joint; (e) comparing the determined riveted characteristic of step (d) with the data of step (a); and (f) deenergizing the electric motor to prevent the self-piercing rivet from directly contacting against the die when the rivet is in a substantially optimum workpiece-engaging position between the punch and the die.
  • 19. The program of claim 18 further comprising receiving a signal from a sensor located in the riveting tool indicating the riveted characteristic.
  • 20. The program of claim 19 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates the thickness of at least two workpieces riveted together by the self-piercing rivet.
  • 21. The program of claim 18 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates the length of the rivet.
  • 22. The program of claim 18 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates the quality of the riveted joint.
  • 23. The program of claim 18 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates the quantity of force applied by the punch.
  • 24. The program of claim 18 further comprising deenergizing the electric motor and sending an error signal if an undesirable riveted characteristic is determined.
  • 25. The program of claim 18 further comprising allowing the riveting tool to operate in a subsequent riveting cycle if an acceptable riveted characteristic is determined.
  • 26. The program of claim 18 further comprising causing a robot to move the riveting tool.
  • 27. The program of claim 18 further comprising determining the actual speed of the electric motor and comparing the actual speed to a desired speed.
  • 28. The program of claim 18 further comprising determining the actual electrical power characteristic of the electric motor and comparing the actual electrical power characteristic to a desired electrical power characteristic.
  • 29. The program of claim 18 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates a rivet punch assembly location.
  • 30. The program of claim 18 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates the thickness of workpieces to be joined.
  • 31. The program of claim 18 further comprising storing determined values and displaying historical trends between riveting process cycles.
  • 32. The program of claim 18 further comprising determining which rivet should be fed to the riveting tool from multiple different rivet options.
  • 33. A computer program stored on a medium for use in a riveting process employing a self-piercing rivet, a joint, and a riveting tool having an electric motor, a transmission, a punch and a die, the program being operated according to the steps comprising:(a) recalling data about the joint to be riveted; (b) energizing the electric motor and converting rotary motion of the motor to linear motion in the transmission operably driven by the motor; (c) linearly advancing the self-piercing rivet in response to step (b); (d) determining a riveted characteristic of at least one of: (i) the self-piercing rivet and (ii) the joint; (e) comparing the determined riveted characteristic of step (d) with the data of step (a); and (f) receiving a signal responsive to a force applied by a clamp, linearly advancing at least partially with the punch, to a workpiece being riveted.
  • 34. The program of claim 33 further comprising deenergizing the electric motor to prevent the self-piercing rivet from directly contacting against the die when the rivet is in a substantially optimum workpiece-engaging position between the punch and the die.
  • 35. The program of claim 33 further comprising receiving a signal from a sensor located in the riveting tool indicating the riveted characteristic.
  • 36. The program of claim 33 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates the thickness of at least two workpieces riveted together by the self-piercing rivet.
  • 37. The program of claim 33 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates the length of the rivet.
  • 38. The program of claim 33 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates the quality of the riveted joint.
  • 39. The program of claim 33 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates the quantity of force applied by the punch.
  • 40. The program of claim 33 further comprising deenergizing the electric motor and sending an error signal if an undesirable riveted characteristic is determined.
  • 41. The program of claim 33 further comprising allowing the riveting tool to operate in a subsequent riveting cycle if an acceptable riveted characteristic is determined.
  • 42. The program of claim 33 further comprising causing a robot to move the riveting tool.
  • 43. The program of claim 33 further comprising determining the actual torque of the electric motor and comparing the actual torque to a desired torque.
  • 44. The program of claim 33 further comprising determining the actual speed of the electric motor and comparing the actual speed to a desired speed.
  • 45. The program of claim 33 further comprising determining the actual electrical power characteristic of the electric motor and comparing the actual electrical power characteristic to a desired electrical power characteristic.
  • 46. The program of claim 33 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates a rivet punch assembly location.
  • 47. The program of claim 33 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates the thickness of workpieces to be joined.
  • 48. The program of claim 33 further comprising storing determined values and displaying historical trends between riveting process cycles.
  • 49. The program of claim 33 further comprising determining which rivet should be fed to the riveting tool from multiple different rivet options.
  • 50. A computer program stored on a medium for use in a riveting process employing a self-piercing rivet, a joint, and a riveting tool having an electric motor, a transmission, a punch and a die, the program being operated according to the steps comprising:(a) recalling data about the joint to be riveted; (b) energizing the electric motor and converting rotary motion of the motor to linear motion in the transmission operably driven by the motor; (c) linearly advancing the self-piercing rivet in response to step (b); (d) determining a riveted characteristic of at least one of: (i) the self-piercing rivet and (ii) the joint; (e) comparing the determined riveted characteristic of step (d) with the data of step (a); and (f) determining the actual torque of the electric motor and comparing the actual torque to a desired torque.
  • 51. The program of claim 50 further comprising receiving a signal from a sensor located in the riveting tool indicating the riveted characteristic.
  • 52. The program of claim 50 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates the thickness of at least two workpieces riveted together by the self-piercing rivet.
  • 53. The program of claim 50 further comprising deenergizing the electric motor to prevent the self-piercing rivet from directly contacting against the die when the rivet is in a substantially optimum workpiece-engaging position between the punch and the die.
  • 54. The program of claim 50 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates the length of the rivet.
  • 55. The program of claim 50 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates the quality of the riveted joint.
  • 56. The program of claim 50 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates the quantity of force applied by the punch.
  • 57. The program of claim 50 further comprising receiving a signal responsive to a force applied by a clamp linearly advancing at least partially with the punch, to a workpiece being riveted.
  • 58. The program of claim 50 further comprising deenergizing the electric motor and sending an error signal if an undesirable riveted characteristic is determined.
  • 59. The program of claim 50 further comprising allowing the riveting tool to operate in a subsequent riveting cycle if an acceptable riveted characteristic is determined.
  • 60. The program of claim 50 further comprising causing a robot to move the riveting tool.
  • 61. The program of claim 50 further comprising determining the actual speed of the electric motor and comparing the actual speed to a desired speed.
  • 62. The program of claim 50 further comprising determining the actual electrical power characteristic of the electric motor and comparing the actual electrical power characteristic to a desired electrical power characteristic.
  • 63. The program of claim 50 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates a rivet punch assembly location.
  • 64. The program of claim 50 wherein the riveted characteristic indicates the thickness of workpieces to be joined.
  • 65. The program of claim 50 further comprising storing determined values and displaying historical trends between riveting process cycles.
  • 66. The program of claim 50 further comprising determining which rivet should be fed to the riveting tool from multiple different rivet options.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
197 31 222 Jul 1997 DE
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/358,751, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,276,050 filed on Jul. 21, 1999, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/119,255, filed on Jul. 20, 1998, which claims priority to German Patent Application No. DE 197 31 222.5, filed on Jul. 21, 1997.

US Referenced Citations (87)
Number Name Date Kind
1611876 Berger Dec 1926 A
2342089 Rossmann Feb 1944 A
2465534 Havener Mar 1949 A
2493868 Griffin Jan 1950 A
3811313 Schut May 1974 A
3961408 Goodsmith et al. Jun 1976 A
4044462 Anselmo Aug 1977 A
4096727 Gargaillo Jun 1978 A
4128000 Hogenhout et al. Dec 1978 A
4132108 Hogenhout Jan 1979 A
4151735 McDermott May 1979 A
4192058 Falcioni Mar 1980 A
4365401 Ogren Dec 1982 A
4384667 Smallegan et al. May 1983 A
4459073 Muller Jul 1984 A
4511074 Kille et al. Apr 1985 A
4543701 Muller Oct 1985 A
4553074 Jacquemet Nov 1985 A
4555838 Muller Dec 1985 A
4574453 Sawdon Mar 1986 A
4615475 Fuhrmeister Oct 1986 A
4620656 McClay et al. Nov 1986 A
4625903 Becht Dec 1986 A
4633560 Muller Jan 1987 A
4662556 Gidlund May 1987 A
4765057 Muller Aug 1988 A
4858481 Abraham Aug 1989 A
4901431 Gast Feb 1990 A
4911592 Muller Mar 1990 A
4915558 Muller Apr 1990 A
4955119 Bonomi et al. Sep 1990 A
4964314 Wilkes Oct 1990 A
4999896 Mangus et al. Mar 1991 A
5042137 Speller, Sr. Aug 1991 A
5056207 Ladouceur Oct 1991 A
5060362 Birke et al. Oct 1991 A
5131130 Eshghy Jul 1992 A
5131255 Fushiya et al. Jul 1992 A
5140735 Ladouceur Aug 1992 A
5169047 Endres et al. Dec 1992 A
5196773 Yoshikawa et al. Mar 1993 A
5201892 Salter Apr 1993 A
5207085 Hopkins et al. May 1993 A
5212862 Eshghy May 1993 A
5216819 Givler Jun 1993 A
5222289 Michalewski et al. Jun 1993 A
5231747 Clark et al. Aug 1993 A
5259104 Givler Nov 1993 A
5277049 Endo Jan 1994 A
5329694 Sickels et al. Jul 1994 A
5331831 Schneider Jul 1994 A
5398537 Michalewski et al. Mar 1995 A
5471729 Zoltaszek Dec 1995 A
5471865 Michalewski et al. Dec 1995 A
5472087 Rink et al. Dec 1995 A
5473805 Wille Dec 1995 A
5487215 Ladouceur Jan 1996 A
5491372 Erhart Feb 1996 A
5502884 Ladouceur Apr 1996 A
5510940 Tacklind et al. Apr 1996 A
5531009 Givler Jul 1996 A
5533250 Ladouceur Jul 1996 A
5544401 Danino Aug 1996 A
5557154 Erhart Sep 1996 A
5575166 Michalewski et al. Nov 1996 A
5581587 Satoh et al. Dec 1996 A
5615474 Kellner et al. Apr 1997 A
5655289 Wille et al. Aug 1997 A
RE35619 Muller Oct 1997 E
5673839 Howard et al. Oct 1997 A
5752305 Cotterill et al. May 1998 A
5779127 Blacket et al. Jul 1998 A
5795114 Schweitzer et al. Aug 1998 A
5802691 Zoltaszek Sep 1998 A
5809833 Newport et al. Sep 1998 A
5829115 Speller, Jr. et al. Nov 1998 A
5893203 Buttrick, Jr. Apr 1999 A
5957362 Samulowitz et al. Sep 1999 A
6011482 Banks et al. Jan 2000 A
6014804 Lulay et al. Jan 2000 A
6058598 Dixon et al. May 2000 A
6148507 Swanson et al. Nov 2000 A
6199271 Hahn et al. Mar 2001 B1
6219898 Kubanek et al. Apr 2001 B1
6276050 Mauer et al. Aug 2001 B1
6347449 Calkins et al. Feb 2002 B1
6385843 Singh et al. May 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (38)
Number Date Country
94105734.8 May 1994 CN
1113837 Dec 1995 CN
1 292 112 Apr 1969 DE
40 19 467 Jan 1992 DE
42 37 621 Aug 1993 DE
44 19 065 Dec 1995 DE
0 129 358 Dec 1984 EP
0 130 076 Jan 1985 EP
0 344 906 Dec 1989 EP
0 685 662 Dec 1995 EP
0 768 128 Oct 1996 EP
0 922 538 Jun 1999 EP
2 350 901 May 1976 FR
2 290 970 Aug 1997 FR
1 476 227 Jun 1977 GB
1 487 098 Sep 1977 GB
2300183 Oct 1996 GB
49-16653 Feb 1974 JP
50-84976 Jul 1975 JP
51-135265 Nov 1976 JP
51-135319 Nov 1976 JP
52-133877 Oct 1977 JP
52-134180 Nov 1977 JP
52-135960 Nov 1977 JP
53-146866 Nov 1978 JP
56-077042 Jun 1981 JP
56-120807 Sep 1981 JP
60-94927 Jun 1985 JP
61-20910 Feb 1986 JP
63-90543 Jun 1988 JP
3-210931 Sep 1991 JP
4-169828 Jun 1992 JP
7-108497 Apr 1995 JP
1696081 Dec 1991 SU
WO 9115316 Mar 1991 WO
WO 9310925 Jun 1993 WO
WO 9324258 Dec 1993 WO
WO 0007751 Feb 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (17)
Entry
European Search Report, 3 pages for EP 01 30 1512 dated May 29, 2002.
“Weiterentwicklung der Stanzniettechnik”, Lothar Budde, Wilhelm Lappe, Fritz Lliebrecht, Dietmar Susse, 192, pp. 310-314.
Declaration of Kenneth Edwards (with exhibits) 12/98.
Affidavit of John R. Perkins (with exhibits) 12/98.
Affidavit of John Russell, 12/98.
aT Angewandte Technik Niettechnik+Alaternativen, 1991, pp. 34-38.
“Dubbel Taschenbuch fur den Maschinenbau”, W. Beitz, K.H. Kuttner, 1981, pp. 370-371.
Lothar Budde and Wilhelm Lappe, Bander Bleche Rohre 5—1991, pp. 94-100.
“Ein Angebot mit Lucken Blech '90 in Essen: Elemente und Gerate zum Fugen”, Bander Bleche Rohre 1—1991, pp. 52-56, with English translation.
“Qualitatssicherung in der Niettechnik” Lothar Budde, Uwe Klemens, Wilhelm Lappe, Oct. 1990.
1.6 Riveted Joints, K. Federn, Berlin, 1.6.1 Claims. Stresses in Rivets and Plates, prior to Jul. 20, 1998, pp. 1-3.
An Offer with Gaps, Blech '90 [Plate '90] in Essen: Element and Equipment for Joining, prior to Jul. 20, 1998, pp. 1-5.
Quality Assurance in Riveting Technology, Lothar Budde, Uwe Klemens, Wilhelm Lappe, Oct. 9, 1990, pp. 1-16.
Sheet Metal Industries, Advanced Car Bodies Trigger New Fastening Technology, Oct. 1992, pp. 14, 16.
Henrob Rivet Setter Drawing, believed to have been offered for sale, publicly used or known prior to Jul. 20, 1998.
Nissan Motor Co. Ltd., Patent Abstract of Japan 07108497, Processing Gun Using Piezoelectric Element and its Control Device, Dec. 10, 1993.
German Patent No. DE 44 19 065 Abstract (English Translation), Dec. 7, 1995.
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/119255 Jul 1998 US
Child 09/358751 US