The application of freeze point depressants on roadways has long been a method of combating the formation of ice. Traditionally, dedicated maintenance vehicles have applied anti-icing solid or liquid chemicals to areas that have a high risk for developing ice. It is important to apply these anti-icing chemicals to the roadway before freezing occurs, as this prevents a bond from forming between ice and the roadway. Freeze-point depressants do this by depressing the freezing point of the liquid on the roadway, much as the anti-freeze in a car radiator prevents it from freezing.
To do this well, a highway agency needs to know whether the current road conditions warrant the application of chemicals. If the road surface has an adequate concentration of chemicals for the current conditions, the application of additional freeze-point depressant is unnecessary, costly, and has an impact on the environment. Road Weather Information Systems (RWIS) and their associated pavement sensors are one cost-effective way for highway agencies to monitor current road conditions, without sending personnel into the field. Many RWIS systems can send information on the current road conditions to a centralized traffic management center, where decisions on the application of additional freeze-point depressant can be made.
There are also some highway sites, such as bridges and overpasses, which typically freeze long before the rest of the roadway. Since the expense of sending a truck with anti-icing chemicals to such a site is high, many highway agencies are installing fixed anti-icing systems. These systems automatically determine the most opportune time to spray, based on the current local conditions as reported by pavement and other RWIS sensors. One of the most important parts of the RWIS system is the pavement sensor, as it allows the determination of the current conditions of the roadway.
In its simplest form, the pavement sensor can consist of a thermometer that measures the temperature of the road surface. Measuring the temperature alone does not give enough information to determine if ice will form, however. This is because the exact concentration of the liquid present on the roadway is not known. For instance, the road temperature may be near 0° C., the freezing point of water. This may mean that the formation of ice is probable; however, previous applications of anti-icing chemicals may have depressed the freezing point of the liquid on the roadway. Precipitation and its runoff may also have diluted the anti-icing chemicals previously applied to the road. To most accurately gauge the current freeze point of the roadway, a sample of the actual liquid on the roadway needs to be analyzed. One method of doing this is to freeze a small sample of solution on the roadway and determine its freezing point. Such a sensor is known as an active sensor, because it actively changes the state of the liquid that is on the road surface.
The following sections describe a new active pavement sensor that includes unique features that increase the sensor's ability to accurately predict the current state of the road.
By way of general introduction, the illustrated pavement sensors include one or more of the following features, that can be used alone or in combination:
This section has been provided only by way of general introduction, and it is not intended to narrow the scope of the following claims.
Turning now to the drawings,
The exterior of the module 10 is formed by a lower housing 12 and a cover 14. The lower housing 12 is connected via a cable 18 with a remote station (not shown in
In this non-limiting example, the cover 14 is formed of a thermally insulative material having thermal properties and a color which are similar to that of the adjacent road surface (e.g. thermal conductivity of about 0.24 W/m·K). The use of such an insulative material for the cover 14 helps insure that the cover tracks the temperature of the road, as well as isolating a liquid collected in the cover during freezing point detection runs. In this non-limiting example, the lower housing 12 is made of a thermally conductive material to facilitate the removal of heat generated by the sensor module 10. Preferably, a ring of the same insulative material as that used for the cover 14 is secured to the top of the lower housing 12. This prevents the top cover 14 from becoming bonded to the grout material that is used to fix the module 10 in the roadway.
As shown in
Also shown in
Using the digital two-conductor temperature sensors described below, the temperature probe 300 can be reconfigured to include several temperature sensors 302. These sensors would communicate and receive power over the same two-conductor bus. In this configuration, the temperature probe 300 can be lengthened so that it measures the temperature at a number of different locations in the roadway. Likewise, the temperature sensor 300 can be located vertically, so that its internal sensors measure the temperature profile of the road. In this way, the temperature probe 300 can be configured so that the three dimensional temperature profile of the roadway is gathered, with all of the data and power for this network being transferred over the same two-conductor bus.
As also shown in
In this example, the thermistor housing 26 is formed of aluminum having a thermal conductivity of about 200 W/m·K. The use of aluminum reduces the thermal mass of the housing 26 and decreases the response time of the thermistor.
Though not shown in
Also not shown in
Many materials can be adapted for use in the module 10. By way of example, the materials of Table 1 have been found suitable.
The sample well 20 captures a small amount of the liquid that is in the sample cup 16. This well 20 enhances heat flow into the water directly above the thermistor 24, by lessening the distance between the cold thermal link 32 and this sample of water.
The use of a thermistor well 20 has other benefits, in addition to better thermal conduction. The cold thermal link 32 cools much more rapidly than the water directly over the thermistor 24. This promotes freezing of the water over the link 32, which then provides seed crystals, allowing the water over the thermistor 24 to freeze with less supercooling. This pre-freezing of the water over the link 32 provides another advantage in that it protects the sample in the thermistor well 20 from splashes created by passing vehicles.
In this non limiting example, the sensor module 10 includes the following major components.
Controller
A programmable controller provides the control and analysis capability to the system. It includes an 8-bit microprocessor running at 18.432 MHz, 256K of flash memory, and 128K of RAM. The controller may be implemented as a Z-World Rabbit Core, Model RCM 2020, programmed via Dynamic C (
The controller can execute the program of attached Appendix 1. Appendix 1 is made up of ASCII records of the following format: :NNAAAATTDD1DD2DD3 . . . DDNCC
The colon starts every record. Each letter represents a hexadecimal nibble with the following meanings.
NN—Number of data bytes in record. For Dynamic C generated hex files, this is always either 02 for extended address records, 20 for data records, or 00 for EOF records.
AAAA—16 bit address. This is the offset portion off the destination address using the Intel real-mode addressing. The segment portion of the real-mode address is determined from the extended address record in the file previous to the data record. The physical offset into the memory device is computed by shifting the segment left 4 bits and adding the offset.
TT—Type of record. For Dynamic C generated hex files, this is always either 02 for extended address records, 00 for data records, or 01 for EOF records.
DDi—Data byte
CC—8 bit checksum of all previous bytes in the record. The two's complement of the checksum is used.
Appendix 1 includes copyrighted material, and the copyright holder hereby reserves all rights in Appendix 1, other than the right to reproduce Appendix 1 as part of this specification.
Daughter Board Electronics
The daughter board electronics include an A/D converter, current drivers for the sensor thermistor and conductivity probes (
Sensor Cup Temperature Measurement
The daughter board measures the sample cup thermistor 24 via a precision current driver and a 16-bit A/D converter (
External Two Conductor Temperature Measurement
In this non-limiting example, external temperatures are measured using Dallas Semiconductor Corporation's digital two conductor temperature sensors (known as “1-wire sensors”). These sensors are an example of two-conductor sensors because they only require two conductors to transmit both data and power. These sensors derive their power from the data line, whenever it is held in its high state. Additionally, each of these sensors has its own globally unique address. This means that many sensors can be placed on the same two-conductor bus. Also, since the sensors are digital, they can be located remotely (up to and even more than three hundred meters) from the host sensor.
These three features (a simple two-conductor bus, globally unique addresses, and digital communication) give these sensors an economic advantage over more traditional sensing techniques, such as individually connected sensors. For instance, a series of five of these sensors can be used to measure the temperature of the road at five different depths. Another application is the measurement of the road surface temperature at a number of locations. More traditional sensors each require their own wires and their distance from the host sensor is limited if they produce analog signals. Digital sensors exist that communicate over a bus, but a method is required (i.e., an address) to differentiate the sensors. These sensors also typically require separate power circuits. The amount of wire and the number of conductors required are a significant part of the design as the cost of wire for long runs can exceed that of the sensors that are at the end of the wire.
Electrical Conductivity Measurement
The resistance between the two conductivity probes 22 is measured via a precision current driver and the second channel in the 16-bit A/D converter (
Peltier Power Circuit
The Peltier power circuit turns on the Peltier cooler 30, as directed by the controller (
The following four parameters are measured by the sensor module 10:
road surface temperature,
road surface moisture conductivity,
temperature of a sample of liquid in the sample well 20,
subsurface temperature (optional).
These parameters are used by the controller to determine the freeze point of liquid in the sample well, as well as to provide dew and frost warnings.
Freeze Point Algorithm
During the determination of the freeze point, the onboard controller stores the temperature of the liquid in the sample cup versus time. This data is then analyzed to determine the freezing temperature of the liquid, as described below. The algorithms described below assess the shape of the resulting freezing curve, and surface conductivity is used as a verification of the freezing of the sample.
Dew Warning Algorithm
If the ambient temperature is near freezing and the road is dry, the Peltier cooler can cool the sample by several degrees. If moisture is then detected, the sensor will give a dew warning, indicating the impending formation of dew, and possibly black ice.
Frost Warning Algorithm
If the ambient temperature is below freezing and the road is dry, the Peltier cooler can cool the sample cup by several degrees. It can then be heated back to the ambient temperature. If moisture is then detected, the sensor will give a frost warning, indicating the impending formation of frost.
The following section describes the method used by the sensor module 10 to detect the freeze point of a liquid. This method searches for a constant temperature condition that exists during freezing. It does this by continuously fitting a series of lines to the temperature versus time data. It also continuously monitors the electrical conductivity of the water to determine if freezing has occurred.
Discussion of the Data Gathered
As described above, this method makes use of the fact that the cooling curve of a freezing liquid is nearly level.
It should be noted that there are variations to the shape of the cooling curve, as described above and shown in
It should be noted that the shapes of the curves, including the slopes, the amount of supercooling, and the temperatures obtained during freezing, are highly dependant upon the design of the sensor itself. For example, changing the heat capacity, conductivity, or geometry of any of the components, or changing the Peltier cooler 30 or the characteristics of the Peltier cooler power source, will change the shape of the curves observed. There are numerous other changes that can be made to the design of the sensor that will change the shape of the cooling curves.
Presently Preferred Algorithm
The freeze-point detection algorithm analyzes the temperature versus time data acquired from the thermistor 24 by fitting a series of lines to the preceding six data points.
The three upper lines in
The conductivity measurement is used as a verification that freezing has occurred. Use of the conductivity alone as an indicator of freezing would result in an unreliable measurement. This is because the conductivity probes are not necessarily the same temperature as the water in the thermistor well. The measured conductance can be used as verification.
The slope b can be taken as an example of a first time derivative of the temperature measurements, and the slope of the slope b′ can be taken as an example of a second time derivative of the temperature measurements.
Description of the Algorithm
The following paragraphs describe the actions that are taken by the sensor algorithm to determine the freeze point of a liquid in the thermistor well.
1. Take a current sample cup temperature reading.
2. Fit a line to the last 6 sample cup temperature data points using linear regression. The line has the equation
T=a+b·t,
where a and b are constants, T represents temperature, and t represents time. The fitting equations for the constants a and b are as follows:
and
a={overscore (T)}−b·{overscore (t)},
where {overscore (t)} and {overscore (T)} are the average values of t and T for the six data points being used.
The goodness of fit, s2, is computed by the equation
where m is the number of data points used in the fit. This line fit statistic is reduced to the “s*10” statistic for convenience in the algorithm by the relation,
s·10=10√{square root over (s2)}.
3. Compute the “slope of the slope” by fitting a line to the last 6 line slopes obtained, using the following formula:
where b′ is the “slope of the slope” and the values of b are the slopes from the last 6 fitted lines.
4. Determine from the fitting constants whether the freezing temperature has been reached. For the sensor module 10, the following rules were applied to the fitted line constants to determine when the freezing temperature had been reached. These rules were based on the characteristics of this particular device. Other devices would most likely have different values for these criteria. Two methods are currently used simultaneously, one that looks for a transition in the curve due to a supercooled fluid and one that assumes no appreciable supercooling.
4.1. For the supercooling routine, no data is considered for the first seconds, so that only reliable fits are considered. After this, the current slope is constantly monitored. When the slope rises above 0.5, a logical variable “Freeze_Start” is set to TRUE, indicating that freezing has begun. This indicates that subsequent line fits should be considered as possible plateaus in the freeze curve. It also sets the Peltier cooler 30 at a reduced power setting, where the Peltier cooler 30 is switched on and off. In the current design, the Peltier cooler 30 is set at a duty cycle of 50 percent once freezing has begun.
4.2. For the non-supercooling routine, no data is considered for the first 10 seconds. This allows for reliable fits and also eliminates the initial level portion of the freeze curve. After this, the current slope is constantly monitored. When the slope is greater than −0.1, a logical variable “Slope_Start” is set to TRUE. This indicates that freezing may have begun, however the Peltier cooler 30 continues at full power. Next the b′ parameter, or slope of the slope, is checked. When this parameter is greater than 0.05, freezing is determined to have begun and the “Freeze_Start” variable is set to TRUE. Subsequent line fits are then considered as possible plateaus in the freeze curve and the Peltier cooler 30 is set a reduced power setting, as is described at 4.1.
4.3. Once one of the above conditions has been met (and “Freeze_Start” has been set to TRUE), the parameters of the current line fit are checked to see if they fall within preset bounds that are indicative of freezing. Currently a value of s*10 that is less than 0.5 and a value of b greater than −0.12 and less than or equal to 0.0 are used to indicate that the plateau has been reached. Testing for values of bin this range are to be understood as one way of testing whether the cooling curve T(t) has leveled off. Thus the term “leveled off” is intended to include slopes of T(t) that are somewhat negative, such as the slopes characteristic of freezing of a salt solution. However, large negative slopes, such as those associated with active cooling after a splash of water has entered the sample well, are excluded.
4.4. If the parameters of step 4.3 are met, the sensor module 10 uses the first data point in the line fit as the determined freeze point. This ensures that the highest temperature is used for concentrated solutions that have a steep freezing curve.
Referring again to
Though not required, the method of
As mentioned above, when the freezing point detection algorithm indicates that freezing has commenced, the earliest temperature measurement (which is typically the highest temperature) within the samples used to determine the slope b is selected as the freezing point temperature.
One method for measuring a liquid freezing point on a roadway includes a sensor module that is embedded in a roadway. The sensor module includes a measurement zone on an upper surface thereof a temperature sensor in good thermal contact with the measurement zone, and an active cooler thermally coupled to the measurement zone. The method progressively cools the measurement zone with the active cooler. The method records temperature measurements of the measurement zone with the temperature sensor repeatedly while the method progressively cools the measurement zone. The method determines a first time derivative of the temperature measurements that were recorded. The method determines when the first time derivative rises above a first, positive threshold value; and then determines when the first time derivative falls to within a range of values bounded above by zero and below by a second, negative threshold value. The method measures a liquid freezing point by associating an earliest temperature measurement included in a line associated with the first time derivative as the liquid freezing point.
The two-conductor devices described above can be constructed as shown schematically in
In this example, the read-only memory 206, the random access memory 208, and the memory controller logic 210 operate as a means for transmitting temperature and address information from the device 200 to the network server 220. These components can be implemented in any desired fashion, and the present invention is not limited to any particular type of controller logic or memory. Similarly, the network server 220 operates as a means for transmitting temperature information from the base station that houses the network server 220 to the remote computer that houses the web-based browser 224. With this arrangement, the user can access via the Internet temperature information measured by any of the devices 200 of
Many alternatives are possible. For example, other networks can be used in substitution for the Internet network described above. The Internet provides important advantages, in that it reduces the cost and inconvenience of remotely accessing information provided by the devices 200. The devices 200 are not limited to temperature measuring devices, and they can include other types of sensors, e.g., conductivity sensors and other sensors based on A/D converters, as well as counters of various types.
Of course, it should be understood that many changes and modifications can be made to the preferred embodiments described above. For example, many changes can be made to the shape of the sample well and adjacent elements.
Also, the two-conductor device 200 and the Internet accessible system of
As used herein, the term “time” is intended broadly to encompass absolute or relative measures of time. The term “time derivative” is intended broadly to encompass time differences, slopes, slope of slopes and other measures of the rate of change of a variable such as temperature, whether averaged or not, whether discrete or continuous, and whether numerically or analytically determined.
The term “conductivity” is intended broadly to encompass any measure that varies as a function of the resistance between two probes, whether the measured parameter is current, voltage or some combination thereof, and whether it varies directly or inversely with resistance, and whether measured with DC or AC voltages.
The term “temperature information” is intended broadly to encompass freezing point temperature as determined with an active cooler, ambient temperature, or other temperature parameters. Further, the term “freezing point temperature” refers to a chosen point in the temperature versus time curve, once solidification has begun, or is about to begin. It is not limited to points at the beginning of solidification of the sample, but can be any appropriate point in the curve.
The term “good thermal contact” is intended broadly to signify that the thermal conductivity between two elements is at least 1 W/m·K.
The foregoing detailed description has discussed only a few of the many forms that this invention can take. This detailed description is therefore intended by way of illustration, and not by way of limitation. It is only the following claims, including all equivalents, that are intended to define the scope of this invention.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/989,790 filed Nov. 19, 2001, which is now U.S. Pat. No. 6,695,469, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2849701 | Clark | Aug 1958 | A |
3203226 | Fiske, Jr. | Aug 1965 | A |
3243793 | Goldman | Mar 1966 | A |
3255412 | Liu | Jun 1966 | A |
3320946 | Dethloff et al. | May 1967 | A |
3478311 | Czingula | Nov 1969 | A |
3582728 | Thoma | Jun 1971 | A |
3613063 | Ciemochowski | Oct 1971 | A |
3634841 | Irvine | Jan 1972 | A |
3636444 | Strawn et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3667280 | Simpson | Jun 1972 | A |
3677064 | Simpson | Jul 1972 | A |
3807699 | France | Apr 1974 | A |
3855861 | Zimmerman et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3873927 | Overall | Mar 1975 | A |
3882381 | Gregory | May 1975 | A |
3891979 | Braun et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3946594 | Surinx | Mar 1976 | A |
3974993 | Hammecke | Aug 1976 | A |
3986110 | Overall et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4119909 | DeBerry | Oct 1978 | A |
4135151 | Rogers et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4164868 | Suntola | Aug 1979 | A |
4210021 | Vykhodtsev et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4222044 | Boschung | Sep 1980 | A |
4227411 | Abramovich | Oct 1980 | A |
4281286 | Briggs | Jul 1981 | A |
4333004 | Forgue et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4335613 | Luukkala | Jun 1982 | A |
4378168 | Kuisma et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4383770 | Boschung et al. | May 1983 | A |
4500940 | Kuisma et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4523142 | Murata et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4557420 | Boschung et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4579462 | Rall et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4601587 | Mathiprakasam | Jul 1986 | A |
4639883 | Michaelis | Jan 1987 | A |
4657409 | Wiggin et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4679160 | Whitener | Jul 1987 | A |
4745803 | Haavasoja | May 1988 | A |
4765187 | Weinstein | Aug 1988 | A |
4766369 | Weinstein | Aug 1988 | A |
4801865 | Miller et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4808009 | Sittler et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4897597 | Whitener | Jan 1990 | A |
4942364 | Nishijima et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4996493 | Monat et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5064294 | Cerf et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5090817 | Ker et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5141329 | Orlando et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5143451 | Millgard | Sep 1992 | A |
5282682 | Orlando et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5345223 | Rutkiewicz | Sep 1994 | A |
5418522 | Freundlieb et al. | May 1995 | A |
5523959 | Seegmiller | Jun 1996 | A |
5619144 | Stormbom | Apr 1997 | A |
5644080 | Stormbom et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5686841 | Stolarczyk et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5801647 | Survo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5833366 | Ma | Nov 1998 | A |
5852243 | Chang et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5874667 | Kasman | Feb 1999 | A |
6239601 | Weinstein | May 2001 | B1 |
6301631 | Chambers et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6511220 | Boschung, Jr. et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6692144 | Kober et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
20020177942 | Knaian et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 163 461 | Mar 1984 | CA |
31 18 997 | Jan 1983 | DE |
3924634 | Jan 1991 | DE |
45106 | Feb 1982 | EP |
0 241 676 | Oct 1987 | EP |
248691 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0 376 721 | Jul 1990 | EP |
60079 | Jul 1981 | FI |
61249 | Feb 1982 | FI |
92440 | Jul 1994 | FI |
2078982 | Oct 1971 | FR |
2180350 | Sep 1986 | GB |
56148024 | Nov 1981 | JP |
01054222 | Mar 1989 | JP |
09143948 | Jun 1997 | JP |
2001059205 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001228265 | Aug 2001 | JP |
WO 9913295 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9931492 | Mar 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050058177 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09989790 | Nov 2001 | US |
Child | 10701906 | US |