Robot system

Abstract
The invention relates to a robotic system with at least one robotic arm and a control unit, which is designed so that it can preset at least one predefined operation that can be carried out by the robotic system. In addition, the robotic system comprises at least one input device attached to the robotic arm which is designed so that the predefined operations of the robotic system can be parameterized by means of the input device. In this case, the input device is designed so that it can provide a user-directed feedback to a user of the robotic system when setting the execution of operations, the logical sequence of the operations and/or parameterizing the predefined operations for the robotic system.
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/EP2016/074251, filed Oct. 10, 2016, entitled “Robot System,” which claims priority to German application serial number 10 2015 012 962.7, filed Oct. 8, 2015. The entire contents of these applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.


The invention relates to a robotic system with at least one robotic arm, at the end of which, for the operation of the robotic system, an effector may be mounted, which e.g. can consist of a tool.


Robots have now become established in many areas of industry and are e.g. used in the automotive industry for mounting, gluing, screwing, cutting, welding, painting or lifting heavy objects.


In order to teach a robotic system the desired operations, the robotic system must be programmed. This can be done with an on-line or off-line method, whereby in the off-line method the robot program is created without using the robot.


In on-line programming, the robot is needed for programming, which e.g. is the case with direct teach-in programming. Here, the individual points of the desired trajectories are approached by directly guiding the effector by an operator and the respective position of the effector, e.g. of a gripping tool, is determined via the internal encoders and stored. After the geometry of the trajectory has been programmed in this way, the trajectory program can be supplemented with additional instructions entered via an external handheld programming user device.


The previous methods of the described on-line programming are time consuming and uncomfortable for the operator.


It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a robotic system in which the programming of the robotic system can be performed faster and easier as compared to previous systems.


This object is achieved by a robotic system as indicated in claim 1.


Advantageous embodiments of the invention are specified in the dependent claims.





Embodiments of the invention will be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which



FIG. 1 shows a robot according to an embodiment of the robotic system according to the invention;



FIG. 2 shows a distal robotic arm member of the robotic arm of the robot system according to the invention, called as pilot head, which is used in connection with an embodiment of the robotic system according to the invention; and



FIG. 3 shows a part of an input device which is used in connection with a preferred embodiment of the robotic system according to the invention.






FIG. 1 shows a robotic system according to the invention comprising a robot 1 which stands on a robot basis 2 which carries a robotic arm (or manipulator) which consists of seven robotic arm members 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 which are linked by means of motion axes (joints). The last (distal) robotic arm member 9, which is also referred to hereinafter as a pilot head, is designed so that in the lower part of the pilot head (not shown in FIG. 1) an effector can be attached thereto, which effector can cause any interaction of the robot with the environment.


Effectors used in connection with the robotic system according to the invention may e.g. be tools for workpiece machining, e.g. a drill, gripper systems for handling and manipulating objects, measuring equipment for carrying out test jobs or cameras, with which the robot can perform observations.


The robot 1 is connected to a computer 10, which takes over the control of the robot 1 and is connected to a display device 11, on which a graphical user interface for programming the robot can be displayed and which, e.g. can consist of a computer screen or the screen of a laptop. The computer 10 is hereinafter also referred to as a control unit.


The pilot head 9 of the robotic system, which is shown in FIG. 2 in a larger dimension, comprises in the upper part a key panel 12, which is also shown in a larger dimension in FIG. 3. The key panel as shown in FIG. 3 has four operating keys 13, 14, 15 and 16 in the form of short-stroke keys, which can be defined or occupied with various functions which must often be called up by the operator in the course of programming and/or parameterizing the robotic system, e.g. delete, save or set, and which are marked with appropriate symbols.


The four operating keys 13, 14, 15 and 16 encircle a D-pad short-stroke key 17, which can be tilted up, down, left and right, e.g. to control a cursor or a selection in a menu displayed on the graphical user interface of the display device in the directions up, down, left and right. In summary, the keys of the key panel 12 attached to the robotic arm and the key 20 constitute an input device.


Instead of a D-pad short-stroke key, other direction keys can also be used for cursor control, e.g. four mutually isolated keys for each of the directions up, down, left and right.


In the center of the D-pad short-stroke key 17, a transparent luminous surface 18 is arranged, which can be illuminated by lighting elements, e.g. one or more LEDs that can be activated by the control unit, in one color or different colors.


In addition, in the lower part of the pilot head 9, a handle 19 is attached, with which the pilot head can be easily guided by an operator of the robotic system.


Further, located in the lower part of the pilot head 9, another button or key 20 is provided, which is mounted on the pilot head such that it can be operated by the operator of the robotic system with the same hand, which hand guides the pilot head 9 or the handle 19 of the pilot head 9 and thus the robotic arm.


The control unit 10, which comprises hardware and software, is designed such that it can specify at least one predefined operation which can be carried out by the robotic system, wherein this operation includes the corresponding control commands with which the axes and the drive of the robot are regulated and the sensors (not shown in FIG. 1) of the robot are controlled.


Preferably, a plurality of predefined operations and the associated commands are stored in the control unit. These predefined operations could include, e.g. picking up objects, placing objects, inserting objects, screwing in objects, drilling, surface finishing or button/key actuating.


In the control unit the predefined operations are assigned to icons that can be presented on a graphical user interface, which can be displayed on the display device by means of the control unit.


In a preferred embodiment of the robotic system according to the invention, the operator can use the keys 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 of the input device to select the desired operations, that the robotic system should perform to accomplish a given task, from a menu displayed on the graphical user interface, in that the operator moves e.g. by means of the D-pad short-stroke key, in the menu to the corresponding operation icon and then, after having selected this icon, confirming this icon by pressing one of the four operating keys 13, 14, 15 and 16, which keys have been previously set with a corresponding function.


In an alternative embodiment, key 20 may also be used to confirm an operation previously selected by means of the D-pad stroke key.


In a further embodiment, the robotic system according to the invention can also be designed in such a way that the control unit is designed to, for each operation, display in the graphical user interface during the parameterization of an operation a predetermined parameterization submenu (context menu) stored in the control unit, in which submenu the various predetermined parameterization options are shown, which can then be selected with the input device on the pilot head 9 via the keys 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and/or 20 by means of a control of the graphical user interface of the parameterization submenu in order to perform a parameterization.


With such a parameterization, e.g. parameters such as the coordinates of points to be approached by the effector, torques, forces, accelerations, time durations, number of repetitions or subsequent operations of an operation can be entered by means of the input device.


In a further embodiment, the control unit stores all possible operations of the robotic system and all possible parameterization submenus aimed for these operations, which are structured such that the operator can conduct all programming of the robotic system at the input device with a very limited number of input elements, e.g. keys, so that the programming can be done without the aid of external input devices such as computer keyboards. Ideally, with the pilot head as shown in FIG. 1, this can even be done with only one hand, so that the operator's second hand is free to be used for other functions, e.g. the actuation of an EMERGENCY STOP switch.


The setting of the parameters can also be done by a dialog menu stored in the control unit, wherein the individual parameters are queried individually and one input must be made on the input device via the keys, respectively. Corresponding feedback on the input device can then be provided, which confirms the respective input of the operator (for example by a green light field 18) or can be displayed as faulty (for example by a red light field 18).


The input device attached to the pilot head does not necessarily have to consist of keys, but may e.g. also include a touchpad, a trackball, a joystick or similar device.


In the robotic system according to the invention, the input device is further adapted to provide a user-directed feedback to an operator of the robotic system while setting the sequence of operations of the robotic system and/or parameterizing the predefined operations for the robotic system.


Such feedback may be provided e.g. optically, in that static or varying light signals are emitted through the light field 18, which are triggered by the control unit.


In another embodiment, the feedback may be designed such that it can be detected haptically by the operator of the robot system. This can be performed e.g. by vibrating the input device, i.e. the pilot head 9, which is triggered by the control unit, in that a drive belonging to the pilot head is activated, accordingly.


According to a further embodiment, the keypad can also have a plurality of light fields by means of which the optical feedback occurs.


The feedback signals are preferably designed so that they confirm an input of the operator as being positive or negative. For example, in the event of a faulty input by the operator, the illuminated field 18 lights up red, while it lights up green when the input is correct.


In another embodiment, the feedback may also be arranged to represent a request to select a predefined operation of the robotic system from a group of predefined operations or to input a parameter with respect to an operation.


According to a further embodiment, the control unit may be configured such that a certain selection of operations and/or parameters is performed by actuating certain keys and/or specific key combinations on the input device.


Further, according to another embodiment, the control unit of the robotic system may be configured to display a graphical user interface on a display device on which the predefined operation can be displayed, wherein the control unit is further configured to provide feedback to the operator depending on the operation represented on the graphical user interface.


In a further embodiment of the robotic system according to the invention, the feedback can also be effected by an acoustic signal. For this, e.g., a speaker can be mounted directly on the input device, which is controlled by the control unit.


The display device of the robotic system may also consist of a 3D display device, e.g. electronic 3D glasses.

Claims
  • 1. Robotic system having at least one robotic arm comprising a plurality of arm members, a control unit configured to specify at least one predefined operation to be performed by the robotic system, and at least one input device attached to the robotic arm configured to parameterize the predefined operations with respect to the robotic system by means of the input device, wherein the input device is attached to an arm member to which an effector can be mounted and is adapted to provide a user-directed feedback to an operator of the robotic system when setting the execution of operations, setting the logical sequence of operations, and/or parameterizing the predefined operations for the robotic system.
  • 2. Robotic system according to claim 1, in which the feedback occurs optically.
  • 3. Robotic system according to claim 2, in which the feedback is effected by static or varying light signals.
  • 4. Robotic system according to claim 1, in which the feedback is designed so that it can be detected haptically by the operator of the robotic system.
  • 5. Robotic system according to claim 4, in which the feedback is provided by a vibration of the input device.
  • 6. Robotic system according to claim 1, in which the input device consists of a multi-key keypad.
  • 7. Robotic system according to claim 6, in which in addition the keypad comprises luminous fields, by means of which the optical feedback takes place.
  • 8. Robotic system according to claim 6, in which the keys of the keypad are adapted to emit light signals.
  • 9. Robotic system according to claim 6, in which the keys comprise color coding associated with a parameterization procedure.
  • 10. Robotic system according to claim 6, in which the keys also include direction keys for two-dimensional control on a graphical user interface.
  • 11. Robotic system according to claim 1, in which the input device consists of a touchpad, a trackball, a touch display, a proximity sensor or a joystick.
  • 12. Robotic system according to claim 1, in which the feedback is configured to positively or negatively acknowledge an operator input, or to provide neutral feedback.
  • 13. Robotic system according to claim 1, in which the feedback is configured to represent a request to select a predefined operation with respect to the robotic system from a group of predefined operations.
  • 14. Robotic system according to claim 1, in which the feedback is configured to represent a request to input a parameter of an operation.
  • 15. Robotic system according to claim 1, in which the parameters acquired in the course of the parameterization comprise parameters derived from the group of parameters, which include coordinates of points to be approached by the effector, torques, forces, accelerations, time durations, number of repetitions or subsequent operations of an operation.
  • 16. Robotic system according to claim 1, in which the feedback is designed so that it represents a fault signal.
  • 17. Robotic system according to claim 1, in which the operations comprise one or more of the operations of the group of operations, which include picking objects, placing objects, inserting objects, screwing objects, drilling, machining surfaces or actuating keys.
  • 18. Robotic system according to claim 1, in which the control unit is configured to select particular operations and/or parameters by actuating certain keys and/or specific key combinations on the input device.
  • 19. Robotic system according to claim 1, in which the input device is configured so that the operator, while guiding the arm member to which the effector can be attached, with his hand, can operate the input device simultaneously with the same hand.
  • 20. Robotic system according to claim 1, in which the input device is axially opposed to the effector.
  • 21. Robotic system according to claim 1, in which the control unit is adapted to display a graphical user interface on a display device on which the predefined operation can be presented, and the control unit is further adapted to provide feedback to the operator depending on the operation as represented on the graphical user interface.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10 2015 012 962 Oct 2015 DE national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2016/074251 10/10/2016 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2017/060539 4/13/2017 WO A
US Referenced Citations (63)
Number Name Date Kind
4025838 Watanabe May 1977 A
4398110 Flinchbaugh et al. Aug 1983 A
4591198 Monforte et al. May 1986 A
4659971 Suzuki et al. Apr 1987 A
4678952 Peterson et al. Jul 1987 A
4804304 Tellden et al. Feb 1989 A
5040338 Schwaer et al. Aug 1991 A
5125149 Inaba et al. Jun 1992 A
5360249 Monforte et al. Nov 1994 A
6246479 Jung Jun 2001 B1
6422441 Settelmayer et al. Jul 2002 B1
6463360 Terada et al. Oct 2002 B1
8059088 Eid Nov 2011 B2
8226140 Dietrich et al. Jul 2012 B1
8423189 Nakanishi et al. Apr 2013 B2
8918215 Bosscher Dec 2014 B2
8997599 Maisonnier et al. Apr 2015 B2
10279478 Akan May 2019 B2
20010038453 Jung Nov 2001 A1
20010045808 Hietmann et al. Nov 2001 A1
20050093821 Massie May 2005 A1
20050285854 Morita Dec 2005 A1
20060091842 Nishiyama et al. May 2006 A1
20060259195 Eliuk Nov 2006 A1
20070057913 Eid Mar 2007 A1
20080016979 Yasumura et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080252311 Koh Oct 2008 A1
20090314120 Larsson et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100045808 Matsusaka et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100073150 Olson Mar 2010 A1
20100198394 Trygg Aug 2010 A1
20100212133 Montesanti Aug 2010 A1
20100262288 Svensson Oct 2010 A1
20100314895 Rizk et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110190932 Tsusaka et al. Aug 2011 A1
20120185099 Bosscher Jul 2012 A1
20120217129 Tsutsumi et al. Aug 2012 A1
20130151010 Kubota et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130255426 Kassow Oct 2013 A1
20130273818 Guan et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140047940 Yamamoto Feb 2014 A1
20140183979 Pelrine Jul 2014 A1
20140252668 Austin Sep 2014 A1
20150053040 Ueda et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150122070 Yamaguchi May 2015 A1
20150364353 Sugizaki et al. Dec 2015 A1
20170252920 Motomura et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170320211 Akan Nov 2017 A1
20180186017 Xiong et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180207795 Haddadin et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180345505 Haddadin Dec 2018 A1
20180354141 Haddadin Dec 2018 A1
20180361594 Haddadin Dec 2018 A1
20190054634 Haddadin Feb 2019 A1
20190099879 Haddadin Apr 2019 A1
20190099881 Niu Apr 2019 A1
20190099903 Goto Apr 2019 A1
20190126465 Haddadin May 2019 A1
20190126468 Haddadin May 2019 A1
20190134811 Haddadin May 2019 A1
20190168383 Haddadin Jun 2019 A1
20190315002 Haddadin Oct 2019 A1
20190275681 Bohme et al. Nov 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (43)
Number Date Country
509927 Dec 2011 AT
2940490 Sep 2015 CA
201437046 Apr 2010 CN
102302858 Jan 2012 CN
102410342 Apr 2012 CN
104802156 Jul 2015 CN
296 09 018 Aug 1996 DE
197 31 656 Jan 1999 DE
199 56 176 Oct 2001 DE
699 21 721 Nov 2005 DE
10 2005 054575 Apr 2007 DE
10 2008 062622 Jun 2010 DE
10 2009 039104 Mar 2011 DE
10 2010 063 222 Jun 2012 DE
10 2013 013679 Feb 2014 DE
10 2013 109753 Mar 2014 DE
10 2014 216514 Sep 2015 DE
10 2016 004788 Oct 2017 DE
441397 Aug 1991 EP
1435737 Jul 2004 EP
1880809 Jan 2008 EP
2129498 Dec 2009 EP
2131257 Dec 2009 EP
2548706 Jan 2013 EP
2784612 Oct 2014 EP
2851162 Mar 2015 EP
2864085 Apr 2015 EP
2868439 May 2015 EP
S60 123288 Jul 1985 JP
S61 252084 Oct 1986 JP
S62 87153 Apr 1987 JP
H08281580 Oct 1996 JP
2000-218584 Aug 2000 JP
2008-23642 Feb 2008 JP
2014-0011973 Jan 2014 KR
WO 2007082954 Jul 2007 WO
WO 2007099511 Sep 2007 WO
WO 2009124904 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2010088959 Aug 2010 WO
WO 2011107143 Sep 2011 WO
WO 2014162161 Oct 2014 WO
WO 2014170355 Oct 2014 WO
WO 2015113757 Aug 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (50)
Entry
PCT/EP2016/069339, Oct. 17, 2016, International Search Report and Written Opinion.
PCT/EP2016/069339, Feb. 20, 2018, International Preliminary Report on Patentability.
PCT/EP2016/074250, Jan. 30, 2017, International Search Report and Written Opinion.
PCT/EP2016/074251, Feb. 2, 2017, International Search Report and Written Opinion.
PCT/EP2016/074252, Feb. 2, 2017, International Search Report and Written Opinion.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/752,574, filed Feb. 13, 2018, Haddadin et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/766,080, filed Apr. 5, 2018, Haddadin.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/766,094, filed Apr. 5, 2018, Haddadin.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/077,705, filed Aug. 13, 2018, Haddadin.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/083,192, filed Sep. 7, 2018, Haddadin.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/095,326, filed Oct. 19, 2018, Haddadin.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/095,332, filed Oct. 19, 2018, Haddadin et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/095,336, filed Oct. 19, 2018, Haddadin.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/095,622, filed Oct. 22, 2018, Haddadin.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/095,624, filed Oct. 22, 2018, Haddadin et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/340,916, filed Apr. 10, 2019, Bohme et al.
PCT/EP2017/059448, Aug. 1, 2017, International Search Report and Written Opinion.
PCT/EP2017/059448, Oct. 23, 2018, International Preliminary Report on Patentability.
PCT/EP2017/059446, Jul. 19, 2017, International Search Report and Written Opinion.
PCT/EP2017/059446, Oct. 23, 2018, International Preliminary Report on Patentability.
PCT/EP2017/059572, Jul. 27, 2017, International Search Report and Written Opinion.
PCT/EP2017/059572, Oct. 30, 2018, International Preliminary Report on Patentability.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/EP2017/059448 dated Aug. 1, 2017.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/EP2017/059448 dated Oct. 23, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/EP2017/059446 dated Jul. 19, 2017.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/EP2017/059446 dated Oct. 23, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/EP2017/059572 dated Jul. 27, 2017.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/EP2017/059572 dated Oct. 30, 2018.
[No Author Listed], “Advanced Automation for Space Missions,” NASA Conference Publication 2255, Aug. 29, 1980, pp. 1-335. Retrieved from https://ntrs/nasa/gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19830007077.pdf on Jul. 7, 2017.
[No Author Listed], “FANUC,” YouTube, Dec. 22, 2007. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SREct28IJM on Jul. 11, 2017. Supplemented by five .PNGimages taken from video.
[No Author Listed], CNC Products and Services. Brochure. FANUC America Corporation. 2017. Retrieved Jan. 24, 2019 from https://www.fanucamerica.com/docs/default-source/cnc-files/brochures/cnc-products-and-services.pdf?sfvrsn=865fc162_4.
Sakakibara, A two-armed intelligent robot assembles mini robots automatically. Industrial Electronics, Control, and Instrumentation. Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE IECON 22nd International Conference on Taipaei, Taiwan. 1996;3(5):1879-1883.
Schafer et al., Light-Weight Mechatronics and Sensorics for Robotic Exploration: a DLR Perspective. Feb. 25, 2008. Retrived from http://elib.dlr.de/55362/1/i-sairas2008_Schafer.pdf on Mar. 24, 2017.
CN 102302858 is understood by its English-language machine translation and figures.
CN 102410342 is understood by its English-language machine translation and figures.
CN 104802156 is understood by its English-language machine translation and figures.
DE 199 56 176 is understood by its English-language machine translation and figures.
DE 699 21 721 is understood by its English-language abstract and figures.
DE 10 2005 054575 is understood by its English-language abstract and figures.
DE 10 2008 062622 is understood by its English-language abstract and figures.
DE 10 2010 063222 is understood by its English-language abstract and figures.
DE 10 2013 013679 is understood by its English-language abstract and figures.
DE 10 2013 109753 is understood by its English-language abstract and figures.
DE 10 2014 216514 is understood by its English-language machine translation and figures.
EP 2131257 is understood by its English-language abstract and figures.
EP 2851162 is understood by its English-language abstract and figures.
JP H08281580 is understood by its English-language abstract and figures.
JP 2008-23642 is understood by its English-language machine translation and figures.
WO 2009/124904 is understood by its English-language abstract and figures.
WO 2015/113757 is understood by its English-language abstract and figures.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180345505 A1 Dec 2018 US